Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A.
Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. (CPAC) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CPAC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Construction Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPAC | $6.37 | +5.29% | 542.6M | 10.00 | $0.64 | +7.92% |
| CRH | $97.05 | -1.52% | 65.8B | 20.65 | $4.71 | +1.48% |
| VMC | $273.24 | +1.16% | 36.2B | 38.47 | $7.12 | +0.69% |
| MLM | $578.06 | +0.38% | 35B | 33.24 | $17.45 | +0.54% |
| JHX | $27.00 | +0.00% | 15.8B | 27.86 | $0.98 | N/A |
| CX | $8.55 | +1.54% | 12.5B | 14.16 | $0.61 | +0.97% |
| SUM | $52.49 | +0.08% | 9.2B | 61.75 | $0.85 | N/A |
| EXP | $229.86 | +4.05% | 7.4B | 16.57 | $13.76 | +0.44% |
| KNF | $82.55 | +0.67% | 4.6B | 25.73 | $3.18 | N/A |
| TGLS | $77.24 | +0.47% | 3.6B | 20.85 | $3.70 | +0.72% |
Stock Comparison
CPAC vs CRH Comparison July 2025
CPAC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPAC stands at 542.6M. In comparison, CRH has a market cap of 65.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CPAC is priced at $6.37, while CRH trades at $97.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas CRH's P/E ratio is 20.65. In terms of profitability, CPAC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CRH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CPAC is more volatile compared to CRH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPAC.Check CRH's competition here
CPAC vs VMC Comparison July 2025
CPAC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPAC stands at 542.6M. In comparison, VMC has a market cap of 36.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CPAC is priced at $6.37, while VMC trades at $273.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas VMC's P/E ratio is 38.47. In terms of profitability, CPAC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VMC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CPAC is more volatile compared to VMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPAC.Check VMC's competition here
CPAC vs MLM Comparison July 2025
CPAC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPAC stands at 542.6M. In comparison, MLM has a market cap of 35B. Regarding current trading prices, CPAC is priced at $6.37, while MLM trades at $578.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas MLM's P/E ratio is 33.24. In terms of profitability, CPAC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MLM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CPAC is more volatile compared to MLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPAC.Check MLM's competition here
CPAC vs JHX Comparison July 2025
CPAC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPAC stands at 542.6M. In comparison, JHX has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CPAC is priced at $6.37, while JHX trades at $27.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas JHX's P/E ratio is 27.86. In terms of profitability, CPAC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to JHX's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CPAC is more volatile compared to JHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPAC.Check JHX's competition here
CPAC vs CX Comparison July 2025
CPAC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPAC stands at 542.6M. In comparison, CX has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CPAC is priced at $6.37, while CX trades at $8.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas CX's P/E ratio is 14.16. In terms of profitability, CPAC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CPAC is more volatile compared to CX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPAC.Check CX's competition here
CPAC vs SUM Comparison July 2025
CPAC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPAC stands at 542.6M. In comparison, SUM has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CPAC is priced at $6.37, while SUM trades at $52.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas SUM's P/E ratio is 61.75. In terms of profitability, CPAC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SUM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CPAC is more volatile compared to SUM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPAC.Check SUM's competition here
CPAC vs EXP Comparison July 2025
CPAC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPAC stands at 542.6M. In comparison, EXP has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CPAC is priced at $6.37, while EXP trades at $229.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas EXP's P/E ratio is 16.57. In terms of profitability, CPAC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EXP's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CPAC is more volatile compared to EXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPAC.Check EXP's competition here
CPAC vs KNF Comparison July 2025
CPAC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPAC stands at 542.6M. In comparison, KNF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CPAC is priced at $6.37, while KNF trades at $82.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas KNF's P/E ratio is 25.73. In terms of profitability, CPAC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KNF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CPAC is more volatile compared to KNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPAC.Check KNF's competition here
CPAC vs TGLS Comparison July 2025
CPAC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPAC stands at 542.6M. In comparison, TGLS has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CPAC is priced at $6.37, while TGLS trades at $77.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas TGLS's P/E ratio is 20.85. In terms of profitability, CPAC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TGLS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CPAC is more volatile compared to TGLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPAC.Check TGLS's competition here
CPAC vs BCC Comparison July 2025
CPAC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPAC stands at 542.6M. In comparison, BCC has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CPAC is priced at $6.37, while BCC trades at $86.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas BCC's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, CPAC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BCC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CPAC is more volatile compared to BCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPAC.Check BCC's competition here
CPAC vs USLM Comparison July 2025
CPAC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPAC stands at 542.6M. In comparison, USLM has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CPAC is priced at $6.37, while USLM trades at $111.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas USLM's P/E ratio is 26.79. In terms of profitability, CPAC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to USLM's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CPAC is more volatile compared to USLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPAC.Check USLM's competition here
CPAC vs TTAM Comparison July 2025
CPAC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPAC stands at 542.6M. In comparison, TTAM has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CPAC is priced at $6.37, while TTAM trades at $14.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas TTAM's P/E ratio is 14.84. In terms of profitability, CPAC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TTAM's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CPAC is less volatile compared to TTAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPAC.Check TTAM's competition here
CPAC vs LOMA Comparison July 2025
CPAC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPAC stands at 542.6M. In comparison, LOMA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CPAC is priced at $6.37, while LOMA trades at $11.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas LOMA's P/E ratio is 18.60. In terms of profitability, CPAC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LOMA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CPAC is less volatile compared to LOMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPAC.Check LOMA's competition here
CPAC vs SMID Comparison July 2025
CPAC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPAC stands at 542.6M. In comparison, SMID has a market cap of 197.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CPAC is priced at $6.37, while SMID trades at $36.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas SMID's P/E ratio is 20.05. In terms of profitability, CPAC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SMID's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CPAC is more volatile compared to SMID. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPAC.Check SMID's competition here
CPAC vs FEAM Comparison July 2025
CPAC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPAC stands at 542.6M. In comparison, FEAM has a market cap of 80.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CPAC is priced at $6.37, while FEAM trades at $3.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas FEAM's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, CPAC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FEAM's ROE of -2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CPAC is less volatile compared to FEAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPAC.Check FEAM's competition here
CPAC vs CAPT Comparison July 2025
CPAC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPAC stands at 542.6M. In comparison, CAPT has a market cap of 48.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CPAC is priced at $6.37, while CAPT trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas CAPT's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, CPAC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CAPT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CPAC is less volatile compared to CAPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPAC.Check CAPT's competition here
CPAC vs STAI Comparison July 2025
CPAC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPAC stands at 542.6M. In comparison, STAI has a market cap of 30.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CPAC is priced at $6.37, while STAI trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas STAI's P/E ratio is -4.10. In terms of profitability, CPAC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to STAI's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CPAC is less volatile compared to STAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPAC.Check STAI's competition here
CPAC vs RETO Comparison July 2025
CPAC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPAC stands at 542.6M. In comparison, RETO has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CPAC is priced at $6.37, while RETO trades at $2.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas RETO's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CPAC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RETO's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CPAC is less volatile compared to RETO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPAC.Check RETO's competition here
CPAC vs USCR Comparison July 2025
CPAC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPAC stands at 542.6M. In comparison, USCR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CPAC is priced at $6.37, while USCR trades at $73.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 10.00, whereas USCR's P/E ratio is -393.56. In terms of profitability, CPAC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to USCR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CPAC is more volatile compared to USCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPAC.Check USCR's competition here