Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A.
Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. (CPAC) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CPAC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Construction Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPAC | $6.50 | +1.04% | 542.7M | 9.17 | $0.69 | +7.72% |
| CRH | $112.59 | -0.65% | 75.8B | 23.61 | $4.77 | +1.29% |
| VMC | $290.30 | -0.72% | 38.4B | 40.21 | $7.22 | +0.66% |
| MLM | $604.50 | -0.56% | 36.4B | 33.47 | $18.05 | +0.52% |
| CX | $8.87 | -0.34% | 12.9B | 14.53 | $0.61 | +0.95% |
| JHX | $19.81 | -3.41% | 11.5B | 25.74 | $0.77 | N/A |
| SUM | $52.49 | +0.08% | 9.2B | 61.75 | $0.85 | N/A |
| EXP | $236.74 | -0.97% | 7.7B | 17.44 | $13.58 | +0.42% |
| KNF | $90.95 | -0.97% | 5.2B | 33.67 | $2.70 | N/A |
| USLM | $119.48 | -1.68% | 3.4B | 27.40 | $4.36 | +0.19% |
Stock Comparison
CPAC vs CRH Comparison August 2025
CPAC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPAC stands at 542.7M. In comparison, CRH has a market cap of 75.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CPAC is priced at $6.50, while CRH trades at $112.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas CRH's P/E ratio is 23.61. In terms of profitability, CPAC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CRH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CPAC is more volatile compared to CRH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPAC.Check CRH's competition here
CPAC vs VMC Comparison August 2025
CPAC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPAC stands at 542.7M. In comparison, VMC has a market cap of 38.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CPAC is priced at $6.50, while VMC trades at $290.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas VMC's P/E ratio is 40.21. In terms of profitability, CPAC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VMC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CPAC is more volatile compared to VMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPAC.Check VMC's competition here
CPAC vs MLM Comparison August 2025
CPAC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPAC stands at 542.7M. In comparison, MLM has a market cap of 36.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CPAC is priced at $6.50, while MLM trades at $604.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas MLM's P/E ratio is 33.47. In terms of profitability, CPAC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MLM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CPAC is more volatile compared to MLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPAC.Check MLM's competition here
CPAC vs CX Comparison August 2025
CPAC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPAC stands at 542.7M. In comparison, CX has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CPAC is priced at $6.50, while CX trades at $8.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas CX's P/E ratio is 14.53. In terms of profitability, CPAC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CPAC is more volatile compared to CX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPAC.Check CX's competition here
CPAC vs JHX Comparison August 2025
CPAC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPAC stands at 542.7M. In comparison, JHX has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CPAC is priced at $6.50, while JHX trades at $19.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas JHX's P/E ratio is 25.74. In terms of profitability, CPAC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to JHX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CPAC is less volatile compared to JHX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPAC.Check JHX's competition here
CPAC vs SUM Comparison August 2025
CPAC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPAC stands at 542.7M. In comparison, SUM has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CPAC is priced at $6.50, while SUM trades at $52.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas SUM's P/E ratio is 61.75. In terms of profitability, CPAC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SUM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CPAC is less volatile compared to SUM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPAC.Check SUM's competition here
CPAC vs EXP Comparison August 2025
CPAC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPAC stands at 542.7M. In comparison, EXP has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CPAC is priced at $6.50, while EXP trades at $236.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas EXP's P/E ratio is 17.44. In terms of profitability, CPAC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EXP's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CPAC is more volatile compared to EXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPAC.Check EXP's competition here
CPAC vs KNF Comparison August 2025
CPAC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPAC stands at 542.7M. In comparison, KNF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CPAC is priced at $6.50, while KNF trades at $90.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas KNF's P/E ratio is 33.67. In terms of profitability, CPAC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KNF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CPAC is more volatile compared to KNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPAC.Check KNF's competition here
CPAC vs USLM Comparison August 2025
CPAC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPAC stands at 542.7M. In comparison, USLM has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CPAC is priced at $6.50, while USLM trades at $119.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas USLM's P/E ratio is 27.40. In terms of profitability, CPAC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to USLM's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CPAC is less volatile compared to USLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPAC.Check USLM's competition here
CPAC vs TGLS Comparison August 2025
CPAC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPAC stands at 542.7M. In comparison, TGLS has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CPAC is priced at $6.50, while TGLS trades at $72.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas TGLS's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, CPAC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TGLS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CPAC is more volatile compared to TGLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPAC.Check TGLS's competition here
CPAC vs BCC Comparison August 2025
CPAC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPAC stands at 542.7M. In comparison, BCC has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CPAC is priced at $6.50, while BCC trades at $89.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas BCC's P/E ratio is 13.19. In terms of profitability, CPAC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BCC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CPAC is more volatile compared to BCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPAC.Check BCC's competition here
CPAC vs TTAM Comparison August 2025
CPAC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPAC stands at 542.7M. In comparison, TTAM has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CPAC is priced at $6.50, while TTAM trades at $15.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas TTAM's P/E ratio is 17.95. In terms of profitability, CPAC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TTAM's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CPAC is more volatile compared to TTAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPAC.Check TTAM's competition here
CPAC vs LOMA Comparison August 2025
CPAC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPAC stands at 542.7M. In comparison, LOMA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CPAC is priced at $6.50, while LOMA trades at $9.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas LOMA's P/E ratio is 29.16. In terms of profitability, CPAC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LOMA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CPAC is less volatile compared to LOMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPAC.Check LOMA's competition here
CPAC vs SMID Comparison August 2025
CPAC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPAC stands at 542.7M. In comparison, SMID has a market cap of 218.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CPAC is priced at $6.50, while SMID trades at $41.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas SMID's P/E ratio is 18.18. In terms of profitability, CPAC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SMID's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CPAC is less volatile compared to SMID. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPAC.Check SMID's competition here
CPAC vs FEAM Comparison August 2025
CPAC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPAC stands at 542.7M. In comparison, FEAM has a market cap of 65.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CPAC is priced at $6.50, while FEAM trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas FEAM's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, CPAC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FEAM's ROE of -2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CPAC is less volatile compared to FEAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPAC.Check FEAM's competition here
CPAC vs CAPT Comparison August 2025
CPAC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPAC stands at 542.7M. In comparison, CAPT has a market cap of 37.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CPAC is priced at $6.50, while CAPT trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas CAPT's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, CPAC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CAPT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CPAC is less volatile compared to CAPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPAC.Check CAPT's competition here
CPAC vs STAI Comparison August 2025
CPAC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPAC stands at 542.7M. In comparison, STAI has a market cap of 22.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CPAC is priced at $6.50, while STAI trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas STAI's P/E ratio is -1.59. In terms of profitability, CPAC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to STAI's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CPAC is less volatile compared to STAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPAC.Check STAI's competition here
CPAC vs RETO Comparison August 2025
CPAC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPAC stands at 542.7M. In comparison, RETO has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CPAC is priced at $6.50, while RETO trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas RETO's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CPAC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RETO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CPAC is more volatile compared to RETO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPAC.Check RETO's competition here
CPAC vs USCR Comparison August 2025
CPAC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPAC stands at 542.7M. In comparison, USCR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CPAC is priced at $6.50, while USCR trades at $73.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPAC currently has a P/E ratio of 9.17, whereas USCR's P/E ratio is -393.56. In terms of profitability, CPAC's ROE is +0.17%, compared to USCR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CPAC is more volatile compared to USCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPAC.Check USCR's competition here