CMS Energy Corporation
CMS Energy Corporation (CMS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CMS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Regulated Electric Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CMS | $77.83 | +1.37% | 23.9B | 22.05 | $3.53 | +2.82% |
| NEE | $92.78 | +1.12% | 193.3B | 28.12 | $3.30 | +2.50% |
| SO | $98.01 | +0.18% | 109.7B | 25.01 | $3.92 | +3.00% |
| DUK | $133.15 | +1.01% | 103.6B | 21.10 | $6.31 | +3.18% |
| DUK-PA | $24.93 | -0.24% | 97.3B | 5.24 | $4.76 | +3.18% |
| NGG | $90.90 | +0.10% | 90.4B | 22.73 | $4.00 | +3.39% |
| AEP | $133.61 | +1.05% | 72.3B | 20.24 | $6.60 | +2.80% |
| SOMN | $52.81 | +0.93% | 57.7B | N/A | N/A | +2.42% |
| D | $63.21 | +0.59% | 55.6B | 18.22 | $3.47 | +4.22% |
| XEL | $81.91 | +1.35% | 51.1B | 23.95 | $3.42 | +2.81% |
Stock Comparison
CMS vs NEE Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, NEE has a market cap of 193.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while NEE trades at $92.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas NEE's P/E ratio is 28.12. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NEE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is less volatile compared to NEE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.Check NEE's competition here
CMS vs SO Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, SO has a market cap of 109.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while SO trades at $98.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas SO's P/E ratio is 25.01. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to SO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.Check SO's competition here
CMS vs DUK Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, DUK has a market cap of 103.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while DUK trades at $133.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas DUK's P/E ratio is 21.10. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DUK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to DUK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.Check DUK's competition here
CMS vs DUK-PA Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, DUK-PA has a market cap of 97.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while DUK-PA trades at $24.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas DUK-PA's P/E ratio is 5.24. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DUK-PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to DUK-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.Check DUK-PA's competition here
CMS vs NGG Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, NGG has a market cap of 90.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while NGG trades at $90.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas NGG's P/E ratio is 22.73. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NGG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is less volatile compared to NGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.Check NGG's competition here
CMS vs AEP Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, AEP has a market cap of 72.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while AEP trades at $133.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas AEP's P/E ratio is 20.24. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AEP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to AEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.Check AEP's competition here
CMS vs SOMN Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, SOMN has a market cap of 57.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while SOMN trades at $52.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas SOMN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SOMN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is less volatile compared to SOMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.Check SOMN's competition here
CMS vs D Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, D has a market cap of 55.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while D trades at $63.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas D's P/E ratio is 18.22. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to D's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to D. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.Check D's competition here
CMS vs XEL Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, XEL has a market cap of 51.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while XEL trades at $81.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas XEL's P/E ratio is 23.95. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to XEL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is less volatile compared to XEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.Check XEL's competition here
CMS vs EXC Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, EXC has a market cap of 51B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while EXC trades at $49.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas EXC's P/E ratio is 18.32. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EXC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is less volatile compared to EXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.Check EXC's competition here
CMS vs NEE-PN Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, NEE-PN has a market cap of 49.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while NEE-PN trades at $23.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas NEE-PN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NEE-PN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to NEE-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.Check NEE-PN's competition here
CMS vs ETR Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, ETR has a market cap of 47.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while ETR trades at $105.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas ETR's P/E ratio is 27.28. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ETR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is less volatile compared to ETR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.Check ETR's competition here
CMS vs PEG Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, PEG has a market cap of 41.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while PEG trades at $83.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas PEG's P/E ratio is 19.84. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PEG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is less volatile compared to PEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.Check PEG's competition here
CMS vs ED Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, ED has a market cap of 41.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while ED trades at $114.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas ED's P/E ratio is 20.33. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ED's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is less volatile compared to ED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.Check ED's competition here
CMS vs EXCVV Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, EXCVV has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while EXCVV trades at $41.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas EXCVV's P/E ratio is 15.66. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EXCVV's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is less volatile compared to EXCVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.Check EXCVV's competition here
CMS vs PCG Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, PCG has a market cap of 39.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while PCG trades at $18.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas PCG's P/E ratio is 15.37. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PCG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is less volatile compared to PCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.Check PCG's competition here
CMS vs ELC Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, ELC has a market cap of 38.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while ELC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas ELC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ELC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CMS has daily volatility of 1.29 and ELC has daily volatility of N/A.Check ELC's competition here
CMS vs WEC Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, WEC has a market cap of 38.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while WEC trades at $117.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas WEC's P/E ratio is 24.40. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WEC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is less volatile compared to WEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.Check WEC's competition here
CMS vs DTE Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, DTE has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while DTE trades at $149.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas DTE's P/E ratio is 21.28. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DTE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to DTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.Check DTE's competition here
CMS vs AEE Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, AEE has a market cap of 31B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while AEE trades at $112.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas AEE's P/E ratio is 20.94. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AEE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is less volatile compared to AEE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.Check AEE's competition here
CMS vs FE Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, FE has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while FE trades at $51.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas FE's P/E ratio is 29.07. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is less volatile compared to FE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.Check FE's competition here
CMS vs FTS Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, FTS has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while FTS trades at $58.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas FTS's P/E ratio is 23.36. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FTS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to FTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.Check FTS's competition here
CMS vs PPL Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, PPL has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while PPL trades at $38.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas PPL's P/E ratio is 24.23. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PPL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is less volatile compared to PPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.Check PPL's competition here
CMS vs CNP Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, CNP has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while CNP trades at $44.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas CNP's P/E ratio is 27.50. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CNP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to CNP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.Check CNP's competition here
CMS vs EIX Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, EIX has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while EIX trades at $71.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas EIX's P/E ratio is 6.21. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EIX's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is less volatile compared to EIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.Check EIX's competition here
CMS vs ES Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, ES has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while ES trades at $73.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas ES's P/E ratio is 15.96. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ES's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is less volatile compared to ES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.Check ES's competition here
CMS vs EBR-B Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, EBR-B has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while EBR-B trades at $11.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas EBR-B's P/E ratio is 21.63. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EBR-B's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is less volatile compared to EBR-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.Check EBR-B's competition here
CMS vs SOJD Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, SOJD has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while SOJD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas SOJD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SOJD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CMS has daily volatility of 1.29 and SOJD has daily volatility of N/A.Check SOJD's competition here
CMS vs DTY Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, DTY has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while DTY trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas DTY's P/E ratio is 5.53. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DTY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to DTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.Check DTY's competition here
CMS vs SOJC Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, SOJC has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while SOJC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas SOJC's P/E ratio is 26.06. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SOJC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CMS has daily volatility of 1.29 and SOJC has daily volatility of N/A.Check SOJC's competition here
CMS vs KEP Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, KEP has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while KEP trades at $16.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas KEP's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KEP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is less volatile compared to KEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.Check KEP's competition here
CMS vs EBR Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, EBR has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while EBR trades at $9.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas EBR's P/E ratio is 17.04. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EBR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is less volatile compared to EBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.Check EBR's competition here
CMS vs SOJE Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, SOJE has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while SOJE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas SOJE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SOJE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CMS has daily volatility of 1.29 and SOJE has daily volatility of N/A.Check SOJE's competition here
CMS vs EVRG Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, EVRG has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while EVRG trades at $82.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas EVRG's P/E ratio is 22.58. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EVRG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to EVRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.Check EVRG's competition here
CMS vs DUKB Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, DUKB has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while DUKB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas DUKB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DUKB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CMS has daily volatility of 1.29 and DUKB has daily volatility of N/A.Check DUKB's competition here
CMS vs AQNB Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, AQNB has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while AQNB trades at $25.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas AQNB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AQNB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to AQNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.Check AQNB's competition here
CMS vs LNT Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, LNT has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while LNT trades at $72.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas LNT's P/E ratio is 23.18. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LNT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to LNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.Check LNT's competition here
CMS vs EMA Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, EMA has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while EMA trades at $53.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas EMA's P/E ratio is 21.46. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EMA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to EMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.Check EMA's competition here
CMS vs SREA Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, SREA has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while SREA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas SREA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SREA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CMS has daily volatility of 1.29 and SREA has daily volatility of N/A.Check SREA's competition here
CMS vs AGR Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, AGR has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while AGR trades at $36.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas AGR's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AGR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is less volatile compared to AGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.Check AGR's competition here
CMS vs NEE-PR Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, NEE-PR has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while NEE-PR trades at $6.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas NEE-PR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NEE-PR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is less volatile compared to NEE-PR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.Check NEE-PR's competition here
CMS vs PNW Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, PNW has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while PNW trades at $102.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas PNW's P/E ratio is 20.37. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PNW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is less volatile compared to PNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.Check PNW's competition here
CMS vs OGE Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, OGE has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while OGE trades at $48.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas OGE's P/E ratio is 20.84. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OGE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to OGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.Check OGE's competition here
CMS vs OKLO Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, OKLO has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while OKLO trades at $58.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas OKLO's P/E ratio is -104.21. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OKLO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is less volatile compared to OKLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.Check OKLO's competition here
CMS vs IDA Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, IDA has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while IDA trades at $142.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas IDA's P/E ratio is 24.14. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IDA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to IDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.Check IDA's competition here
CMS vs CMSD Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, CMSD has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while CMSD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas CMSD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CMSD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CMS has daily volatility of 1.29 and CMSD has daily volatility of N/A.Check CMSD's competition here
CMS vs CMSC Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, CMSC has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while CMSC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas CMSC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CMSC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CMS has daily volatility of 1.29 and CMSC has daily volatility of N/A.Check CMSC's competition here
CMS vs CMS-PB Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, CMS-PB has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while CMS-PB trades at $78.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas CMS-PB's P/E ratio is 7.18. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CMS-PB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to CMS-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.Check CMS-PB's competition here
CMS vs TXNM Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, TXNM has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while TXNM trades at $58.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas TXNM's P/E ratio is 39.76. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TXNM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to TXNM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.Check TXNM's competition here
CMS vs POR Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, POR has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while POR trades at $53.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas POR's P/E ratio is 19.35. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to POR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is less volatile compared to POR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.Check POR's competition here
CMS vs CMSA Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, CMSA has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while CMSA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas CMSA's P/E ratio is 12.24. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CMSA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CMS has daily volatility of 1.29 and CMSA has daily volatility of N/A.Check CMSA's competition here
CMS vs PCG-PA Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, PCG-PA has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while PCG-PA trades at $22.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas PCG-PA's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PCG-PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is less volatile compared to PCG-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.Check PCG-PA's competition here
CMS vs ENIC Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, ENIC has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while ENIC trades at $3.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas ENIC's P/E ratio is 99.00. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ENIC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is less volatile compared to ENIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.Check ENIC's competition here
CMS vs PCG-PB Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, PCG-PB has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while PCG-PB trades at $20.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas PCG-PB's P/E ratio is 11.23. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PCG-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is less volatile compared to PCG-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.Check PCG-PB's competition here
CMS vs CMS-PC Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, CMS-PC has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while CMS-PC trades at $17.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas CMS-PC's P/E ratio is 3.68. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CMS-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is less volatile compared to CMS-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.Check CMS-PC's competition here
CMS vs PCG-PE Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, PCG-PE has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while PCG-PE trades at $19.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas PCG-PE's P/E ratio is 10.72. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PCG-PE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to PCG-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.Check PCG-PE's competition here
CMS vs PCG-PC Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, PCG-PC has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while PCG-PC trades at $19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas PCG-PC's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PCG-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is less volatile compared to PCG-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.Check PCG-PC's competition here
CMS vs PCG-PD Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, PCG-PD has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while PCG-PD trades at $18.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas PCG-PD's P/E ratio is 10.44. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PCG-PD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to PCG-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.Check PCG-PD's competition here
CMS vs FRMI Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, FRMI has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while FRMI trades at $7.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas FRMI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FRMI's ROE of -3.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is less volatile compared to FRMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.Check FRMI's competition here
CMS vs PCG-PG Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, PCG-PG has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while PCG-PG trades at $17.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas PCG-PG's P/E ratio is 9.88. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PCG-PG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to PCG-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.Check PCG-PG's competition here
CMS vs PCG-PH Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, PCG-PH has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while PCG-PH trades at $17.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas PCG-PH's P/E ratio is 9.59. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PCG-PH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is less volatile compared to PCG-PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.Check PCG-PH's competition here
CMS vs DTJ Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, DTJ has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while DTJ trades at $25.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas DTJ's P/E ratio is 4.12. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DTJ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to DTJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.Check DTJ's competition here
CMS vs DTW Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, DTW has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while DTW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas DTW's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DTW's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CMS has daily volatility of 1.29 and DTW has daily volatility of N/A.Check DTW's competition here
CMS vs PNM Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, PNM has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while PNM trades at $41.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas PNM's P/E ratio is 46.41. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PNM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is less volatile compared to PNM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.Check PNM's competition here
CMS vs DTB Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, DTB has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while DTB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas DTB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DTB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CMS has daily volatility of 1.29 and DTB has daily volatility of N/A.Check DTB's competition here
CMS vs DTG Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, DTG has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while DTG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas DTG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DTG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CMS has daily volatility of 1.29 and DTG has daily volatility of N/A.Check DTG's competition here
CMS vs CEPU Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, CEPU has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while CEPU trades at $15.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas CEPU's P/E ratio is 11.82. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CEPU's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is less volatile compared to CEPU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.Check CEPU's competition here
CMS vs EDN Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, EDN has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while EDN trades at $26.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas EDN's P/E ratio is 15.95. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EDN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is less volatile compared to EDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.Check EDN's competition here
CMS vs ETI-P Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, ETI-P has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while ETI-P trades at $23.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas ETI-P's P/E ratio is 6.06. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ETI-P's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to ETI-P. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.Check ETI-P's competition here
CMS vs EAI Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, EAI has a market cap of 961M. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while EAI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas EAI's P/E ratio is 5.99. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EAI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CMS has daily volatility of 1.29 and EAI has daily volatility of N/A.Check EAI's competition here
CMS vs SPKE Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, SPKE has a market cap of 431.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while SPKE trades at $11.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas SPKE's P/E ratio is 19.47. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SPKE's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is less volatile compared to SPKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.Check SPKE's competition here
CMS vs SPKEP Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, SPKEP has a market cap of 409.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while SPKEP trades at $25.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas SPKEP's P/E ratio is 44.46. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SPKEP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to SPKEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.Check SPKEP's competition here
CMS vs GNE Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, GNE has a market cap of 383.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while GNE trades at $14.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas GNE's P/E ratio is 51.23. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GNE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is less volatile compared to GNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.Check GNE's competition here
CMS vs GNE-PA Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, GNE-PA has a market cap of 291.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while GNE-PA trades at $8.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas GNE-PA's P/E ratio is 4.68. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GNE-PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is less volatile compared to GNE-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.Check GNE-PA's competition here
CMS vs GPJA Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, GPJA has a market cap of 208.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while GPJA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas GPJA's P/E ratio is 0.14. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GPJA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CMS has daily volatility of 1.29 and GPJA has daily volatility of N/A.Check GPJA's competition here
CMS vs ENO Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, ENO has a market cap of 186.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while ENO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas ENO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ENO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CMS has daily volatility of 1.29 and ENO has daily volatility of N/A.Check ENO's competition here
CMS vs EMP Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, EMP has a market cap of 178.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while EMP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas EMP's P/E ratio is 1.55. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EMP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CMS has daily volatility of 1.29 and EMP has daily volatility of N/A.Check EMP's competition here
CMS vs ENJ Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, ENJ has a market cap of 175.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while ENJ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas ENJ's P/E ratio is 3.46. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ENJ's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CMS has daily volatility of 1.29 and ENJ has daily volatility of N/A.Check ENJ's competition here
CMS vs VIASP Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, VIASP has a market cap of 97.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while VIASP trades at $25.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas VIASP's P/E ratio is 21.88. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VIASP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to VIASP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.Check VIASP's competition here
CMS vs ETI Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, ETI has a market cap of 57.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while ETI trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas ETI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ETI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to ETI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.Check ETI's competition here
CMS vs ALP-PQ Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, ALP-PQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while ALP-PQ trades at $25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas ALP-PQ's P/E ratio is 0.62. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALP-PQ's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to ALP-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.Check ALP-PQ's competition here
CMS vs DCUE Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, DCUE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while DCUE trades at $101.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas DCUE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DCUE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is less volatile compared to DCUE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.Check DCUE's competition here
CMS vs NEE-PQ Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, NEE-PQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while NEE-PQ trades at $45.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas NEE-PQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NEE-PQ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is less volatile compared to NEE-PQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.Check NEE-PQ's competition here
CMS vs ENIA Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, ENIA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while ENIA trades at $4.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas ENIA's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ENIA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is less volatile compared to ENIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.Check ENIA's competition here
CMS vs NMK Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, NMK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while NMK trades at $18.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas NMK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NMK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is less volatile compared to NMK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.Check NMK's competition here
CMS vs NEE-PP Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, NEE-PP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while NEE-PP trades at $47.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas NEE-PP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NEE-PP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is less volatile compared to NEE-PP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.Check NEE-PP's competition here
CMS vs DTP Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, DTP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while DTP trades at $51.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas DTP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DTP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is less volatile compared to DTP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.Check DTP's competition here
CMS vs PCGU Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, PCGU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while PCGU trades at $145.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas PCGU's P/E ratio is 1188.52. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PCGU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to PCGU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.Check PCGU's competition here
CMS vs CNP-PB Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, CNP-PB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while CNP-PB trades at $46.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas CNP-PB's P/E ratio is 42.64. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CNP-PB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to CNP-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.Check CNP-PB's competition here
CMS vs AEPPZ Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, AEPPZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while AEPPZ trades at $47.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas AEPPZ's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AEPPZ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is less volatile compared to AEPPZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.Check AEPPZ's competition here
CMS vs IPLDP Comparison March 2026
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 23.9B. In comparison, IPLDP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $77.83, while IPLDP trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.05, whereas IPLDP's P/E ratio is 0.94. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IPLDP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to IPLDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.Check IPLDP's competition here