CMS Energy Corporation
CMS Energy Corporation CMS Peers
See (CMS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Regulated Electric Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CMS | $70.91 | +3.08% | 21.21B | 20.98 | $3.38 | +2.98% |
| NEE | $74.56 | +3.28% | 153.49B | 27.93 | $2.67 | +2.83% |
| NEE-PN | $22.66 | +0.43% | 151.93B | N/A | N/A | +2.83% |
| SO | $87.38 | +2.91% | 96.04B | 20.95 | $4.17 | +3.30% |
| SOJD | $20.05 | +0.75% | 94.80B | N/A | N/A | +3.30% |
| SOJC | $21.50 | +0.25% | 94.28B | 25.60 | $0.84 | +3.30% |
| SOJE | $17.58 | -0.11% | 93.94B | N/A | N/A | +3.30% |
| DUK | $115.98 | +3.13% | 90.14B | 19.23 | $6.03 | +3.59% |
| NEE-PR | $42.81 | +2.61% | 88.13B | N/A | N/A | +2.83% |
| DUKB | $24.66 | +0.45% | 87.77B | N/A | N/A | +3.59% |
Stock Comparison
CMS vs NEE Comparison
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 21.21B. In comparison, NEE has a market cap of 153.49B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $70.91, while NEE trades at $74.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas NEE's P/E ratio is 27.93. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NEE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is less volatile compared to NEE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.
CMS vs NEE-PN Comparison
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 21.21B. In comparison, NEE-PN has a market cap of 151.93B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $70.91, while NEE-PN trades at $22.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas NEE-PN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NEE-PN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to NEE-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.
CMS vs SO Comparison
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 21.21B. In comparison, SO has a market cap of 96.04B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $70.91, while SO trades at $87.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas SO's P/E ratio is 20.95. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to SO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.
CMS vs SOJD Comparison
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 21.21B. In comparison, SOJD has a market cap of 94.80B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $70.91, while SOJD trades at $20.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas SOJD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SOJD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to SOJD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.
CMS vs SOJC Comparison
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 21.21B. In comparison, SOJC has a market cap of 94.28B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $70.91, while SOJC trades at $21.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas SOJC's P/E ratio is 25.60. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SOJC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to SOJC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.
CMS vs SOJE Comparison
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 21.21B. In comparison, SOJE has a market cap of 93.94B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $70.91, while SOJE trades at $17.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas SOJE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SOJE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to SOJE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.
CMS vs DUK Comparison
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 21.21B. In comparison, DUK has a market cap of 90.14B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $70.91, while DUK trades at $115.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas DUK's P/E ratio is 19.23. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DUK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to DUK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.
CMS vs NEE-PR Comparison
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 21.21B. In comparison, NEE-PR has a market cap of 88.13B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $70.91, while NEE-PR trades at $42.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas NEE-PR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NEE-PR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is less volatile compared to NEE-PR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.
CMS vs DUKB Comparison
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 21.21B. In comparison, DUKB has a market cap of 87.77B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $70.91, while DUKB trades at $24.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas DUKB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DUKB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to DUKB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.
CMS vs DUK-PA Comparison
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 21.21B. In comparison, DUK-PA has a market cap of 87.45B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $70.91, while DUK-PA trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas DUK-PA's P/E ratio is 5.26. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DUK-PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to DUK-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.
CMS vs NGG Comparison
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 21.21B. In comparison, NGG has a market cap of 68.72B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $70.91, while NGG trades at $70.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas NGG's P/E ratio is 26.06. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NGG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to NGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.
CMS vs AEP Comparison
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 21.21B. In comparison, AEP has a market cap of 54.28B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $70.91, while AEP trades at $101.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas AEP's P/E ratio is 19.62. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AEP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to AEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.
CMS vs SREA Comparison
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 21.21B. In comparison, SREA has a market cap of 49.05B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $70.91, while SREA trades at $20.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas SREA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SREA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to SREA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.
CMS vs D Comparison
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 21.21B. In comparison, D has a market cap of 46.94B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $70.91, while D trades at $55.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas D's P/E ratio is 21.25. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to D's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to D. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.
CMS vs EXC Comparison
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 21.21B. In comparison, EXC has a market cap of 43.84B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $70.91, while EXC trades at $43.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas EXC's P/E ratio is 16.14. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EXC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to EXC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.
CMS vs XEL Comparison
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 21.21B. In comparison, XEL has a market cap of 41.10B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $70.91, while XEL trades at $71.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas XEL's P/E ratio is 20.96. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to XEL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is less volatile compared to XEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.
CMS vs EXCVV Comparison
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 21.21B. In comparison, EXCVV has a market cap of 41.06B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $70.91, while EXCVV trades at $41.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas EXCVV's P/E ratio is 15.66. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EXCVV's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to EXCVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.
CMS vs PEG Comparison
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 21.21B. In comparison, PEG has a market cap of 39.15B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $70.91, while PEG trades at $78.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas PEG's P/E ratio is 21.43. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PEG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to PEG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.
CMS vs PCG Comparison
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 21.21B. In comparison, PCG has a market cap of 38.15B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $70.91, while PCG trades at $17.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas PCG's P/E ratio is 15.93. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PCG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to PCG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.
CMS vs ED Comparison
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 21.21B. In comparison, ED has a market cap of 36.76B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $70.91, while ED trades at $102.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas ED's P/E ratio is 18.86. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ED's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to ED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.
CMS vs ETR Comparison
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 21.21B. In comparison, ETR has a market cap of 35.23B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $70.91, while ETR trades at $81.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas ETR's P/E ratio is 26.47. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ETR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to ETR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.
CMS vs ELC Comparison
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 21.21B. In comparison, ELC has a market cap of 34.77B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $70.91, while ELC trades at $20.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas ELC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ELC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to ELC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.
CMS vs WEC Comparison
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 21.21B. In comparison, WEC has a market cap of 33.48B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $70.91, while WEC trades at $104.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas WEC's P/E ratio is 20.45. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WEC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to WEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.
CMS vs DTE Comparison
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 21.21B. In comparison, DTE has a market cap of 28.26B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $70.91, while DTE trades at $136.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas DTE's P/E ratio is 18.40. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DTE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to DTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.
CMS vs DTW Comparison
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 21.21B. In comparison, DTW has a market cap of 27.66B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $70.91, while DTW trades at $21.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas DTW's P/E ratio is 3.53. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DTW's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to DTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.
CMS vs DTG Comparison
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 21.21B. In comparison, DTG has a market cap of 27.50B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $70.91, while DTG trades at $17.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas DTG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DTG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to DTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.
CMS vs DTB Comparison
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 21.21B. In comparison, DTB has a market cap of 27.38B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $70.91, while DTB trades at $17.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas DTB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DTB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to DTB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.
CMS vs AEE Comparison
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 21.21B. In comparison, AEE has a market cap of 26.17B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $70.91, while AEE trades at $96.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas AEE's P/E ratio is 21.47. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AEE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to AEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.
CMS vs PPL Comparison
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 21.21B. In comparison, PPL has a market cap of 25.45B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $70.91, while PPL trades at $34.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas PPL's P/E ratio is 25.69. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PPL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to PPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.
CMS vs FE Comparison
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 21.21B. In comparison, FE has a market cap of 24.49B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $70.91, while FE trades at $42.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas FE's P/E ratio is 22.57. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to FE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.
CMS vs FTS Comparison
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 21.21B. In comparison, FTS has a market cap of 23.73B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $70.91, while FTS trades at $47.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas FTS's P/E ratio is 19.96. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FTS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to FTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.
CMS vs ES Comparison
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 21.21B. In comparison, ES has a market cap of 22.91B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $70.91, while ES trades at $62.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas ES's P/E ratio is 27.36. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ES's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to ES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.
CMS vs DTY Comparison
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 21.21B. In comparison, DTY has a market cap of 22.65B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $70.91, while DTY trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas DTY's P/E ratio is 5.53. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DTY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to DTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.
CMS vs EIX Comparison
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 21.21B. In comparison, EIX has a market cap of 22.17B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $70.91, while EIX trades at $57.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas EIX's P/E ratio is 8.15. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EIX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to EIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.
CMS vs CMSC Comparison
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 21.21B. In comparison, CMSC has a market cap of 20.82B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $70.91, while CMSC trades at $22.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas CMSC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CMSC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to CMSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.
CMS vs CMSD Comparison
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 21.21B. In comparison, CMSD has a market cap of 20.82B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $70.91, while CMSD trades at $22.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas CMSD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CMSD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to CMSD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.
CMS vs CMSA Comparison
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 21.21B. In comparison, CMSA has a market cap of 20.82B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $70.91, while CMSA trades at $21.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas CMSA's P/E ratio is 11.89. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CMSA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to CMSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.
CMS vs AQNB Comparison
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 21.21B. In comparison, AQNB has a market cap of 18.67B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $70.91, while AQNB trades at $25.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas AQNB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AQNB's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to AQNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.
CMS vs EBR-B Comparison
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 21.21B. In comparison, EBR-B has a market cap of 17.65B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $70.91, while EBR-B trades at $8.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas EBR-B's P/E ratio is 10.27. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EBR-B's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to EBR-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.
CMS vs EBR Comparison
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 21.21B. In comparison, EBR has a market cap of 16.82B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $70.91, while EBR trades at $7.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas EBR's P/E ratio is 9.32. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EBR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to EBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.
CMS vs LNT Comparison
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 21.21B. In comparison, LNT has a market cap of 15.85B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $70.91, while LNT trades at $61.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas LNT's P/E ratio is 21.28. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LNT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to LNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.
CMS vs EVRG Comparison
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 21.21B. In comparison, EVRG has a market cap of 15.12B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $70.91, while EVRG trades at $65.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas EVRG's P/E ratio is 17.29. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EVRG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to EVRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.
CMS vs AGR Comparison
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 21.21B. In comparison, AGR has a market cap of 13.94B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $70.91, while AGR trades at $36.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas AGR's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AGR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to AGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.
CMS vs KEP Comparison
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 21.21B. In comparison, KEP has a market cap of 12.79B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $70.91, while KEP trades at $9.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas KEP's P/E ratio is 3.45. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KEP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is less volatile compared to KEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.
CMS vs PNW Comparison
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 21.21B. In comparison, PNW has a market cap of 10.81B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $70.91, while PNW trades at $90.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas PNW's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PNW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to PNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.
CMS vs OGE Comparison
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 21.21B. In comparison, OGE has a market cap of 8.84B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $70.91, while OGE trades at $43.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas OGE's P/E ratio is 18.22. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OGE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to OGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.
CMS vs CMS-PB Comparison
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 21.21B. In comparison, CMS-PB has a market cap of 6.39B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $70.91, while CMS-PB trades at $75.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas CMS-PB's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CMS-PB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to CMS-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.
CMS vs IDA Comparison
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 21.21B. In comparison, IDA has a market cap of 6.17B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $70.91, while IDA trades at $114.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas IDA's P/E ratio is 20.23. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IDA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to IDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.
CMS vs PCG-PA Comparison
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 21.21B. In comparison, PCG-PA has a market cap of 5.99B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $70.91, while PCG-PA trades at $22.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas PCG-PA's P/E ratio is 12.56. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PCG-PA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to PCG-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.
CMS vs ENIC Comparison
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 21.21B. In comparison, ENIC has a market cap of 5.45B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $70.91, while ENIC trades at $3.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas ENIC's P/E ratio is 35.82. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ENIC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to ENIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.
CMS vs OKLO Comparison
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 21.21B. In comparison, OKLO has a market cap of 5.22B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $70.91, while OKLO trades at $37.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas OKLO's P/E ratio is -50.64. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OKLO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is less volatile compared to OKLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.
CMS vs PCG-PB Comparison
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 21.21B. In comparison, PCG-PB has a market cap of 5.15B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $70.91, while PCG-PB trades at $19.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas PCG-PB's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PCG-PB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to PCG-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.
CMS vs CMS-PC Comparison
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 21.21B. In comparison, CMS-PC has a market cap of 5.07B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $70.91, while CMS-PC trades at $16.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas CMS-PC's P/E ratio is 3.63. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CMS-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to CMS-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.
CMS vs TXNM Comparison
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 21.21B. In comparison, TXNM has a market cap of 4.94B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $70.91, while TXNM trades at $53.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas TXNM's P/E ratio is 23.68. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TXNM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to TXNM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.
CMS vs PCG-PC Comparison
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 21.21B. In comparison, PCG-PC has a market cap of 4.89B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $70.91, while PCG-PC trades at $18.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas PCG-PC's P/E ratio is 2.91. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PCG-PC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to PCG-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.
CMS vs PCG-PE Comparison
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 21.21B. In comparison, PCG-PE has a market cap of 4.76B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $70.91, while PCG-PE trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas PCG-PE's P/E ratio is 9.98. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PCG-PE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to PCG-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.
CMS vs PCG-PD Comparison
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 21.21B. In comparison, PCG-PD has a market cap of 4.68B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $70.91, while PCG-PD trades at $17.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas PCG-PD's P/E ratio is 9.81. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PCG-PD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to PCG-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.
CMS vs POR Comparison
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 21.21B. In comparison, POR has a market cap of 4.62B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $70.91, while POR trades at $42.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas POR's P/E ratio is 14.86. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to POR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to POR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.
CMS vs PCG-PG Comparison
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 21.21B. In comparison, PCG-PG has a market cap of 4.52B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $70.91, while PCG-PG trades at $17.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas PCG-PG's P/E ratio is 9.48. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PCG-PG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to PCG-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.
CMS vs DTJ Comparison
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 21.21B. In comparison, DTJ has a market cap of 4.50B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $70.91, while DTJ trades at $25.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas DTJ's P/E ratio is 4.12. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DTJ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to DTJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.
CMS vs PNM Comparison
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 21.21B. In comparison, PNM has a market cap of 3.77B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $70.91, while PNM trades at $41.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas PNM's P/E ratio is 46.41. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PNM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to PNM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.
CMS vs CEPU Comparison
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 21.21B. In comparison, CEPU has a market cap of 1.98B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $70.91, while CEPU trades at $13.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas CEPU's P/E ratio is 45.45. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CEPU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is less volatile compared to CEPU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.
CMS vs EDN Comparison
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 21.21B. In comparison, EDN has a market cap of 1.52B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $70.91, while EDN trades at $35.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas EDN's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EDN's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is less volatile compared to EDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.
CMS vs ETI-P Comparison
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 21.21B. In comparison, ETI-P has a market cap of 1.07B. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $70.91, while ETI-P trades at $22.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas ETI-P's P/E ratio is 5.87. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ETI-P's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to ETI-P. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.
CMS vs EAI Comparison
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 21.21B. In comparison, EAI has a market cap of 976.72M. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $70.91, while EAI trades at $20.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas EAI's P/E ratio is 6.09. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EAI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to EAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.
CMS vs GNE Comparison
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 21.21B. In comparison, GNE has a market cap of 479.69M. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $70.91, while GNE trades at $17.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas GNE's P/E ratio is 26.91. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GNE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to GNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.
CMS vs SPKE Comparison
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 21.21B. In comparison, SPKE has a market cap of 431.58M. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $70.91, while SPKE trades at $11.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas SPKE's P/E ratio is 19.47. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SPKE's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is less volatile compared to SPKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.
CMS vs SPKEP Comparison
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 21.21B. In comparison, SPKEP has a market cap of 409.91M. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $70.91, while SPKEP trades at $25.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas SPKEP's P/E ratio is 44.46. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SPKEP's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to SPKEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.
CMS vs GNE-PA Comparison
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 21.21B. In comparison, GNE-PA has a market cap of 291.55M. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $70.91, while GNE-PA trades at $8.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas GNE-PA's P/E ratio is 4.68. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GNE-PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to GNE-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.
CMS vs GPJA Comparison
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 21.21B. In comparison, GPJA has a market cap of 206.44M. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $70.91, while GPJA trades at $22.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas GPJA's P/E ratio is 0.14. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GPJA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to GPJA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.
CMS vs ENO Comparison
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 21.21B. In comparison, ENO has a market cap of 186.77M. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $70.91, while ENO trades at $22.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas ENO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ENO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to ENO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.
CMS vs EMP Comparison
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 21.21B. In comparison, EMP has a market cap of 179.13M. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $70.91, while EMP trades at $20.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas EMP's P/E ratio is 1.56. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EMP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to EMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.
CMS vs ENJ Comparison
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 21.21B. In comparison, ENJ has a market cap of 176.43M. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $70.91, while ENJ trades at $20.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas ENJ's P/E ratio is 3.48. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ENJ's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to ENJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.
CMS vs VIASP Comparison
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 21.21B. In comparison, VIASP has a market cap of 94.36M. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $70.91, while VIASP trades at $24.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas VIASP's P/E ratio is 21.26. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VIASP's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to VIASP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.
CMS vs VIA Comparison
CMS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CMS stands at 21.21B. In comparison, VIA has a market cap of 79.52M. Regarding current trading prices, CMS is priced at $70.91, while VIA trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CMS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.98, whereas VIA's P/E ratio is 2.73. In terms of profitability, CMS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VIA's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CMS is more volatile compared to VIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CMS.