Crown LNG Holdings Limited
Crown LNG Holdings Limited CGBS Peers
See (CGBS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Integrated Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGBS | $0.11 | +19.37% | 54M | -0.33 | -$0.33 | N/A |
| XOM | $111.70 | -2.62% | 481.4B | 14.83 | $7.53 | +3.50% |
| CVX | $146.84 | -1.81% | 256.4B | 16.78 | $8.75 | +4.55% |
| SHEL | $70.83 | -2.17% | 209.7B | 16.17 | $4.38 | +3.95% |
| TTE | $61.29 | -2.08% | 136.8B | 10.27 | $5.97 | +5.28% |
| BP | $30.33 | -2.94% | 78.9B | -73.98 | -$0.41 | +6.24% |
| PBR | $12.71 | -2.79% | 78.8B | 9.48 | $1.34 | +15.51% |
| PBR-A | $11.61 | -3.05% | 75.4B | 8.66 | $1.34 | +16.40% |
| EQNR | $26.49 | -4.61% | 72.4B | 8.38 | $3.16 | +8.90% |
| E | $32.32 | -1.85% | 49.2B | 18.16 | $1.78 | +7.04% |
Stock Comparison
CGBS vs XOM Comparison
CGBS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGBS stands at 54M. In comparison, XOM has a market cap of 481.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CGBS is priced at $0.11, while XOM trades at $111.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGBS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas XOM's P/E ratio is 14.83. In terms of profitability, CGBS's ROE is -0.61%, compared to XOM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CGBS is more volatile compared to XOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGBS.
CGBS vs CVX Comparison
CGBS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGBS stands at 54M. In comparison, CVX has a market cap of 256.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CGBS is priced at $0.11, while CVX trades at $146.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGBS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas CVX's P/E ratio is 16.78. In terms of profitability, CGBS's ROE is -0.61%, compared to CVX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CGBS is more volatile compared to CVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGBS.
CGBS vs SHEL Comparison
CGBS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGBS stands at 54M. In comparison, SHEL has a market cap of 209.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CGBS is priced at $0.11, while SHEL trades at $70.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGBS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas SHEL's P/E ratio is 16.17. In terms of profitability, CGBS's ROE is -0.61%, compared to SHEL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CGBS is more volatile compared to SHEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGBS.
CGBS vs TTE Comparison
CGBS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGBS stands at 54M. In comparison, TTE has a market cap of 136.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CGBS is priced at $0.11, while TTE trades at $61.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGBS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas TTE's P/E ratio is 10.27. In terms of profitability, CGBS's ROE is -0.61%, compared to TTE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CGBS is more volatile compared to TTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGBS.
CGBS vs BP Comparison
CGBS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGBS stands at 54M. In comparison, BP has a market cap of 78.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CGBS is priced at $0.11, while BP trades at $30.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGBS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas BP's P/E ratio is -73.98. In terms of profitability, CGBS's ROE is -0.61%, compared to BP's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CGBS is more volatile compared to BP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGBS.
CGBS vs PBR Comparison
CGBS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGBS stands at 54M. In comparison, PBR has a market cap of 78.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CGBS is priced at $0.11, while PBR trades at $12.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGBS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas PBR's P/E ratio is 9.48. In terms of profitability, CGBS's ROE is -0.61%, compared to PBR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CGBS is more volatile compared to PBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGBS.
CGBS vs PBR-A Comparison
CGBS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGBS stands at 54M. In comparison, PBR-A has a market cap of 75.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CGBS is priced at $0.11, while PBR-A trades at $11.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGBS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas PBR-A's P/E ratio is 8.66. In terms of profitability, CGBS's ROE is -0.61%, compared to PBR-A's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CGBS is more volatile compared to PBR-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGBS.
CGBS vs EQNR Comparison
CGBS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGBS stands at 54M. In comparison, EQNR has a market cap of 72.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CGBS is priced at $0.11, while EQNR trades at $26.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGBS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas EQNR's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, CGBS's ROE is -0.61%, compared to EQNR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CGBS is more volatile compared to EQNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGBS.
CGBS vs E Comparison
CGBS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGBS stands at 54M. In comparison, E has a market cap of 49.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CGBS is priced at $0.11, while E trades at $32.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGBS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas E's P/E ratio is 18.16. In terms of profitability, CGBS's ROE is -0.61%, compared to E's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CGBS is more volatile compared to E. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGBS.
CGBS vs SU Comparison
CGBS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGBS stands at 54M. In comparison, SU has a market cap of 47.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CGBS is priced at $0.11, while SU trades at $38.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGBS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas SU's P/E ratio is 11.04. In terms of profitability, CGBS's ROE is -0.61%, compared to SU's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CGBS is more volatile compared to SU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGBS.
CGBS vs IMO Comparison
CGBS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGBS stands at 54M. In comparison, IMO has a market cap of 40.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CGBS is priced at $0.11, while IMO trades at $79.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGBS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas IMO's P/E ratio is 11.60. In terms of profitability, CGBS's ROE is -0.61%, compared to IMO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CGBS is more volatile compared to IMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGBS.
CGBS vs CVE Comparison
CGBS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGBS stands at 54M. In comparison, CVE has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CGBS is priced at $0.11, while CVE trades at $13.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGBS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas CVE's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, CGBS's ROE is -0.61%, compared to CVE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CGBS is more volatile compared to CVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGBS.
CGBS vs EC Comparison
CGBS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGBS stands at 54M. In comparison, EC has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CGBS is priced at $0.11, while EC trades at $9.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGBS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas EC's P/E ratio is 6.33. In terms of profitability, CGBS's ROE is -0.61%, compared to EC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CGBS is more volatile compared to EC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGBS.
CGBS vs YPF Comparison
CGBS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGBS stands at 54M. In comparison, YPF has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CGBS is priced at $0.11, while YPF trades at $33.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGBS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas YPF's P/E ratio is 7.87. In terms of profitability, CGBS's ROE is -0.61%, compared to YPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CGBS is more volatile compared to YPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGBS.
CGBS vs NFG Comparison
CGBS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGBS stands at 54M. In comparison, NFG has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CGBS is priced at $0.11, while NFG trades at $86.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGBS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas NFG's P/E ratio is 187.09. In terms of profitability, CGBS's ROE is -0.61%, compared to NFG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CGBS is more volatile compared to NFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGBS.
CGBS vs TGS Comparison
CGBS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGBS stands at 54M. In comparison, TGS has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CGBS is priced at $0.11, while TGS trades at $26.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGBS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas TGS's P/E ratio is 12.25. In terms of profitability, CGBS's ROE is -0.61%, compared to TGS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CGBS is more volatile compared to TGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGBS.
CGBS vs TANNZ Comparison
CGBS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGBS stands at 54M. In comparison, TANNZ has a market cap of 999.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CGBS is priced at $0.11, while TANNZ trades at $25.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGBS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas TANNZ's P/E ratio is 35.23. In terms of profitability, CGBS's ROE is -0.61%, compared to TANNZ's ROE of +208.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CGBS is more volatile compared to TANNZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGBS.
CGBS vs SLNG Comparison
CGBS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGBS stands at 54M. In comparison, SLNG has a market cap of 94.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CGBS is priced at $0.11, while SLNG trades at $5.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGBS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas SLNG's P/E ratio is 63.25. In terms of profitability, CGBS's ROE is -0.61%, compared to SLNG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CGBS is more volatile compared to SLNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGBS.
CGBS vs SKYQ Comparison
CGBS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGBS stands at 54M. In comparison, SKYQ has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CGBS is priced at $0.11, while SKYQ trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGBS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas SKYQ's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, CGBS's ROE is -0.61%, compared to SKYQ's ROE of -1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CGBS is more volatile compared to SKYQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGBS.
CGBS vs ZEST Comparison
CGBS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGBS stands at 54M. In comparison, ZEST has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CGBS is priced at $0.11, while ZEST trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGBS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas ZEST's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, CGBS's ROE is -0.61%, compared to ZEST's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, CGBS is more volatile compared to ZEST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGBS.
CGBS vs RDS-A Comparison
CGBS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGBS stands at 54M. In comparison, RDS-A has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CGBS is priced at $0.11, while RDS-A trades at $51.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGBS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas RDS-A's P/E ratio is 42.96. In terms of profitability, CGBS's ROE is -0.61%, compared to RDS-A's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CGBS is more volatile compared to RDS-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGBS.
CGBS vs PTR Comparison
CGBS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGBS stands at 54M. In comparison, PTR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CGBS is priced at $0.11, while PTR trades at $46.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGBS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas PTR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGBS's ROE is -0.61%, compared to PTR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CGBS is more volatile compared to PTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGBS.
CGBS vs TELZ Comparison
CGBS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGBS stands at 54M. In comparison, TELZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CGBS is priced at $0.11, while TELZ trades at $25.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGBS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas TELZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGBS's ROE is -0.61%, compared to TELZ's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CGBS is more volatile compared to TELZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGBS.
CGBS vs SNP Comparison
CGBS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGBS stands at 54M. In comparison, SNP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CGBS is priced at $0.11, while SNP trades at $45.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGBS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas SNP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGBS's ROE is -0.61%, compared to SNP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CGBS is more volatile compared to SNP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGBS.
CGBS vs RDS-B Comparison
CGBS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGBS stands at 54M. In comparison, RDS-B has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CGBS is priced at $0.11, while RDS-B trades at $51.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGBS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.33, whereas RDS-B's P/E ratio is 42.98. In terms of profitability, CGBS's ROE is -0.61%, compared to RDS-B's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CGBS is more volatile compared to RDS-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGBS.