Ceigall India Ltd.
Ceigall India Ltd. (CEIGALL.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CEIGALL.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Engineering & Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CEIGALL.NS | ₹286.20 | -0.38% | 50B | 19.21 | ₹14.93 | N/A |
| LT.NS | ₹4,280.50 | -2.29% | 6.1T | 34.54 | ₹127.91 | +0.77% |
| LT.BO | ₹4,278.80 | -2.32% | 6.1T | 34.53 | ₹127.91 | +0.77% |
| RVNL.BO | ₹306.75 | -1.73% | 665.7B | 57.74 | ₹5.53 | +0.85% |
| RVNL.NS | ₹306.85 | -1.68% | 665.5B | 57.83 | ₹5.52 | +0.85% |
| NBCC.NS | ₹95.48 | +0.60% | 257.4B | 39.40 | ₹2.42 | +0.59% |
| NBCC.BO | ₹95.52 | +0.65% | 257.4B | 39.39 | ₹2.42 | +0.59% |
| KPIL.BO | ₹1,106.10 | -2.61% | 202.9B | 24.63 | ₹48.23 | +0.76% |
| KPIL.NS | ₹1,106.40 | -2.57% | 202.7B | 24.61 | ₹48.24 | +0.76% |
| KEC.BO | ₹586.75 | +0.46% | 155.3B | 22.49 | ₹25.93 | +0.94% |
Stock Comparison
CEIGALL.NS vs LT.NS Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, LT.NS has a market cap of 6.1T. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while LT.NS trades at ₹4,280.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas LT.NS's P/E ratio is 34.54. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LT.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is more volatile compared to LT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check LT.NS's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs LT.BO Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, LT.BO has a market cap of 6.1T. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while LT.BO trades at ₹4,278.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas LT.BO's P/E ratio is 34.53. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LT.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is more volatile compared to LT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check LT.BO's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs RVNL.BO Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, RVNL.BO has a market cap of 665.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while RVNL.BO trades at ₹306.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas RVNL.BO's P/E ratio is 57.74. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RVNL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is more volatile compared to RVNL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check RVNL.BO's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs RVNL.NS Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, RVNL.NS has a market cap of 665.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while RVNL.NS trades at ₹306.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas RVNL.NS's P/E ratio is 57.83. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RVNL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is more volatile compared to RVNL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check RVNL.NS's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs NBCC.NS Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, NBCC.NS has a market cap of 257.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while NBCC.NS trades at ₹95.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas NBCC.NS's P/E ratio is 39.40. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NBCC.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is less volatile compared to NBCC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check NBCC.NS's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs NBCC.BO Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, NBCC.BO has a market cap of 257.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while NBCC.BO trades at ₹95.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas NBCC.BO's P/E ratio is 39.39. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NBCC.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is more volatile compared to NBCC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check NBCC.BO's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs KPIL.BO Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, KPIL.BO has a market cap of 202.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while KPIL.BO trades at ₹1,106.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas KPIL.BO's P/E ratio is 24.63. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KPIL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is more volatile compared to KPIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check KPIL.BO's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs KPIL.NS Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, KPIL.NS has a market cap of 202.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while KPIL.NS trades at ₹1,106.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas KPIL.NS's P/E ratio is 24.61. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KPIL.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is more volatile compared to KPIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check KPIL.NS's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs KEC.BO Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, KEC.BO has a market cap of 155.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while KEC.BO trades at ₹586.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas KEC.BO's P/E ratio is 22.49. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KEC.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is less volatile compared to KEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check KEC.BO's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs KEC.NS Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, KEC.NS has a market cap of 155.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while KEC.NS trades at ₹586.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas KEC.NS's P/E ratio is 22.44. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KEC.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is less volatile compared to KEC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check KEC.NS's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs IRCON.BO Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, IRCON.BO has a market cap of 140.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while IRCON.BO trades at ₹149.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas IRCON.BO's P/E ratio is 22.91. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IRCON.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is more volatile compared to IRCON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check IRCON.BO's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs IRCON.NS Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, IRCON.NS has a market cap of 140.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while IRCON.NS trades at ₹149.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas IRCON.NS's P/E ratio is 22.91. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IRCON.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is more volatile compared to IRCON.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check IRCON.NS's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs TECHNOE.NS Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, TECHNOE.NS has a market cap of 134.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while TECHNOE.NS trades at ₹1,136.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas TECHNOE.NS's P/E ratio is 29.08. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TECHNOE.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is less volatile compared to TECHNOE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check TECHNOE.NS's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs TECHNOE.BO Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, TECHNOE.BO has a market cap of 134.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while TECHNOE.BO trades at ₹1,136.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas TECHNOE.BO's P/E ratio is 29.08. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TECHNOE.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is less volatile compared to TECHNOE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check TECHNOE.BO's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs ENGINERSIN.NS Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, ENGINERSIN.NS has a market cap of 122B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while ENGINERSIN.NS trades at ₹217.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas ENGINERSIN.NS's P/E ratio is 22.70. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ENGINERSIN.NS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is less volatile compared to ENGINERSIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check ENGINERSIN.NS's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs ENGINERSIN.BO Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, ENGINERSIN.BO has a market cap of 121.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while ENGINERSIN.BO trades at ₹217.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas ENGINERSIN.BO's P/E ratio is 22.65. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ENGINERSIN.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is less volatile compared to ENGINERSIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check ENGINERSIN.BO's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs AFCONS.NS Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, AFCONS.NS has a market cap of 115.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while AFCONS.NS trades at ₹320.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas AFCONS.NS's P/E ratio is 25.86. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AFCONS.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is more volatile compared to AFCONS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check AFCONS.NS's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs RITES.NS Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, RITES.NS has a market cap of 105.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while RITES.NS trades at ₹219.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas RITES.NS's P/E ratio is 25.54. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RITES.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is more volatile compared to RITES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check RITES.NS's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs RITES.BO Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, RITES.BO has a market cap of 105.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while RITES.BO trades at ₹219.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas RITES.BO's P/E ratio is 25.52. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RITES.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is more volatile compared to RITES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check RITES.BO's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs ITDCEM.NS Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, ITDCEM.NS has a market cap of 103.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while ITDCEM.NS trades at ₹589.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas ITDCEM.NS's P/E ratio is 25.39. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ITDCEM.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is less volatile compared to ITDCEM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check ITDCEM.NS's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs CEMPRO.NS Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, CEMPRO.NS has a market cap of 103.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while CEMPRO.NS trades at ₹589.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas CEMPRO.NS's P/E ratio is 22.14. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CEMPRO.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is less volatile compared to CEMPRO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check CEMPRO.NS's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs CEMPRO.BO Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, CEMPRO.BO has a market cap of 103.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while CEMPRO.BO trades at ₹589.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas CEMPRO.BO's P/E ratio is 22.12. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CEMPRO.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is less volatile compared to CEMPRO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check CEMPRO.BO's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs ITDCEM.BO Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, ITDCEM.BO has a market cap of 103.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while ITDCEM.BO trades at ₹589.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas ITDCEM.BO's P/E ratio is 25.31. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ITDCEM.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is less volatile compared to ITDCEM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check ITDCEM.BO's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs GRINFRA.NS Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, GRINFRA.NS has a market cap of 94.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while GRINFRA.NS trades at ₹982.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas GRINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 8.59. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GRINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is more volatile compared to GRINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check GRINFRA.NS's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs GRINFRA.BO Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, GRINFRA.BO has a market cap of 94.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while GRINFRA.BO trades at ₹981.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas GRINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 8.58. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GRINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is more volatile compared to GRINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check GRINFRA.BO's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs NCC.NS Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, NCC.NS has a market cap of 94.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while NCC.NS trades at ₹150.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas NCC.NS's P/E ratio is 13.02. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NCC.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is less volatile compared to NCC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check NCC.NS's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs NCC.BO Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, NCC.BO has a market cap of 94.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while NCC.BO trades at ₹150.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas NCC.BO's P/E ratio is 11.85. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NCC.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is less volatile compared to NCC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check NCC.BO's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs KALPATPOWR.NS Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, KALPATPOWR.NS has a market cap of 84.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while KALPATPOWR.NS trades at ₹522.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas KALPATPOWR.NS's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KALPATPOWR.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is less volatile compared to KALPATPOWR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check KALPATPOWR.NS's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs TRANSRAILL.NS Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, TRANSRAILL.NS has a market cap of 75.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while TRANSRAILL.NS trades at ₹568.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas TRANSRAILL.NS's P/E ratio is 17.43. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TRANSRAILL.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is less volatile compared to TRANSRAILL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check TRANSRAILL.NS's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs TRANSRAILL.BO Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, TRANSRAILL.BO has a market cap of 75.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while TRANSRAILL.BO trades at ₹568.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas TRANSRAILL.BO's P/E ratio is 17.42. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TRANSRAILL.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is less volatile compared to TRANSRAILL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check TRANSRAILL.BO's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs DBL.BO Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, DBL.BO has a market cap of 72.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while DBL.BO trades at ₹438.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas DBL.BO's P/E ratio is 4.66. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DBL.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is less volatile compared to DBL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check DBL.BO's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs DBL.NS Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, DBL.NS has a market cap of 72.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while DBL.NS trades at ₹438.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas DBL.NS's P/E ratio is 4.65. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DBL.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is less volatile compared to DBL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check DBL.NS's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs LOTUSDEV.NS Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, LOTUSDEV.NS has a market cap of 71.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while LOTUSDEV.NS trades at ₹144.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas LOTUSDEV.NS's P/E ratio is 31.43. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LOTUSDEV.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is more volatile compared to LOTUSDEV.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check LOTUSDEV.NS's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs LOTUSDEV.BO Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, LOTUSDEV.BO has a market cap of 71.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while LOTUSDEV.BO trades at ₹144.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas LOTUSDEV.BO's P/E ratio is 31.26. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LOTUSDEV.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is more volatile compared to LOTUSDEV.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check LOTUSDEV.BO's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs POWERMECH.NS Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, POWERMECH.NS has a market cap of 68.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while POWERMECH.NS trades at ₹2,171.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas POWERMECH.NS's P/E ratio is 20.38. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to POWERMECH.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is more volatile compared to POWERMECH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check POWERMECH.NS's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs POWERMECH.BO Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, POWERMECH.BO has a market cap of 68.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while POWERMECH.BO trades at ₹2,175.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas POWERMECH.BO's P/E ratio is 20.33. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to POWERMECH.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is less volatile compared to POWERMECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check POWERMECH.BO's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs WELENT.BO Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, WELENT.BO has a market cap of 67.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while WELENT.BO trades at ₹498.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas WELENT.BO's P/E ratio is 21.55. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WELENT.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is more volatile compared to WELENT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check WELENT.BO's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs WELENT.NS Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, WELENT.NS has a market cap of 67.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while WELENT.NS trades at ₹497.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas WELENT.NS's P/E ratio is 21.34. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WELENT.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is more volatile compared to WELENT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check WELENT.NS's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs AXISCADES.BO Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, AXISCADES.BO has a market cap of 59.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while AXISCADES.BO trades at ₹1,455.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas AXISCADES.BO's P/E ratio is 59.14. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AXISCADES.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is less volatile compared to AXISCADES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check AXISCADES.BO's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs AXISCADES.NS Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, AXISCADES.NS has a market cap of 59.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while AXISCADES.NS trades at ₹1,451.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas AXISCADES.NS's P/E ratio is 58.84. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AXISCADES.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is less volatile compared to AXISCADES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check AXISCADES.NS's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs PRAJIND.NS Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, PRAJIND.NS has a market cap of 56.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while PRAJIND.NS trades at ₹317.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas PRAJIND.NS's P/E ratio is 109.31. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PRAJIND.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is more volatile compared to PRAJIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check PRAJIND.NS's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs PRAJIND.BO Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, PRAJIND.BO has a market cap of 56.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while PRAJIND.BO trades at ₹317.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas PRAJIND.BO's P/E ratio is 53.96. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PRAJIND.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is more volatile compared to PRAJIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check PRAJIND.BO's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs PNCINFRA.BO Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, PNCINFRA.BO has a market cap of 55.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while PNCINFRA.BO trades at ₹215.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas PNCINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 6.98. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PNCINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is less volatile compared to PNCINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check PNCINFRA.BO's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs PNCINFRA.NS Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, PNCINFRA.NS has a market cap of 55.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while PNCINFRA.NS trades at ₹215.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas PNCINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 6.98. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PNCINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is less volatile compared to PNCINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check PNCINFRA.NS's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs AHLUCONT.NS Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, AHLUCONT.NS has a market cap of 54B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while AHLUCONT.NS trades at ₹809.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas AHLUCONT.NS's P/E ratio is 20.20. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AHLUCONT.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is more volatile compared to AHLUCONT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check AHLUCONT.NS's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs AHLUCONT.BO Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, AHLUCONT.BO has a market cap of 53.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while AHLUCONT.BO trades at ₹810.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas AHLUCONT.BO's P/E ratio is 20.16. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AHLUCONT.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is more volatile compared to AHLUCONT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check AHLUCONT.BO's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs MANINFRA.BO Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, MANINFRA.BO has a market cap of 45B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while MANINFRA.BO trades at ₹110.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas MANINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 15.59. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MANINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is more volatile compared to MANINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check MANINFRA.BO's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs MANINFRA.NS Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, MANINFRA.NS has a market cap of 44.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while MANINFRA.NS trades at ₹110.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas MANINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 18.29. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MANINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is more volatile compared to MANINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check MANINFRA.NS's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs SKIPPER.BO Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, SKIPPER.BO has a market cap of 42.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while SKIPPER.BO trades at ₹375.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas SKIPPER.BO's P/E ratio is 23.27. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SKIPPER.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is more volatile compared to SKIPPER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check SKIPPER.BO's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs SKIPPER.NS Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, SKIPPER.NS has a market cap of 42.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while SKIPPER.NS trades at ₹376.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas SKIPPER.NS's P/E ratio is 23.25. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SKIPPER.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is more volatile compared to SKIPPER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check SKIPPER.NS's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs JKIL.BO Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, JKIL.BO has a market cap of 42B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while JKIL.BO trades at ₹550.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas JKIL.BO's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JKIL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is more volatile compared to JKIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check JKIL.BO's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs JKIL.NS Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, JKIL.NS has a market cap of 41.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while JKIL.NS trades at ₹549.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas JKIL.NS's P/E ratio is 10.73. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JKIL.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is more volatile compared to JKIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check JKIL.NS's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs ASHOKA.NS Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, ASHOKA.NS has a market cap of 40.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while ASHOKA.NS trades at ₹146.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas ASHOKA.NS's P/E ratio is 1.42. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ASHOKA.NS's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is more volatile compared to ASHOKA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check ASHOKA.NS's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs ASHOKA.BO Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, ASHOKA.BO has a market cap of 40.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while ASHOKA.BO trades at ₹146.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas ASHOKA.BO's P/E ratio is 1.42. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ASHOKA.BO's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is more volatile compared to ASHOKA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check ASHOKA.BO's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs KNRCON.BO Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, KNRCON.BO has a market cap of 39B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while KNRCON.BO trades at ₹142.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas KNRCON.BO's P/E ratio is 8.29. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KNRCON.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is more volatile compared to KNRCON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check KNRCON.BO's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs KNRCON.NS Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, KNRCON.NS has a market cap of 38.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while KNRCON.NS trades at ₹142.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas KNRCON.NS's P/E ratio is 8.27. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KNRCON.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is more volatile compared to KNRCON.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check KNRCON.NS's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs HGINFRA.NS Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, HGINFRA.NS has a market cap of 38B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while HGINFRA.NS trades at ₹606.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas HGINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 9.94. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HGINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is less volatile compared to HGINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check HGINFRA.NS's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs HGINFRA.BO Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, HGINFRA.BO has a market cap of 37.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while HGINFRA.BO trades at ₹606.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas HGINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 9.92. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HGINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is more volatile compared to HGINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check HGINFRA.BO's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs BONDADA.BO Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, BONDADA.BO has a market cap of 36.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while BONDADA.BO trades at ₹333.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas BONDADA.BO's P/E ratio is 18.89. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BONDADA.BO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is more volatile compared to BONDADA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check BONDADA.BO's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs HCC.NS Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, HCC.NS has a market cap of 34.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while HCC.NS trades at ₹18.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas HCC.NS's P/E ratio is 19.47. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HCC.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is more volatile compared to HCC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check HCC.NS's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs HCC.BO Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, HCC.BO has a market cap of 34B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while HCC.BO trades at ₹18.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas HCC.BO's P/E ratio is 26.46. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HCC.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is more volatile compared to HCC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check HCC.BO's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs GVPIL.BO Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, GVPIL.BO has a market cap of 33.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while GVPIL.BO trades at ₹454.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas GVPIL.BO's P/E ratio is 26.07. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GVPIL.BO's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is less volatile compared to GVPIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check GVPIL.BO's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs GVPIL.NS Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, GVPIL.NS has a market cap of 33.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while GVPIL.NS trades at ₹459.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas GVPIL.NS's P/E ratio is 26.01. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GVPIL.NS's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is less volatile compared to GVPIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check GVPIL.NS's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs RAMKY.BO Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, RAMKY.BO has a market cap of 32.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while RAMKY.BO trades at ₹481.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas RAMKY.BO's P/E ratio is 14.56. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RAMKY.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is more volatile compared to RAMKY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check RAMKY.BO's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs RAMKY.NS Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, RAMKY.NS has a market cap of 32.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while RAMKY.NS trades at ₹482.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas RAMKY.NS's P/E ratio is 14.55. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RAMKY.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is less volatile compared to RAMKY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check RAMKY.NS's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs INTERARCH.NS Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, INTERARCH.NS has a market cap of 32.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while INTERARCH.NS trades at ₹1,941.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas INTERARCH.NS's P/E ratio is 23.60. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to INTERARCH.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is less volatile compared to INTERARCH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check INTERARCH.NS's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs PSPPROJECT.NS Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, PSPPROJECT.NS has a market cap of 30.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while PSPPROJECT.NS trades at ₹780.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas PSPPROJECT.NS's P/E ratio is 73.78. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PSPPROJECT.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is more volatile compared to PSPPROJECT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check PSPPROJECT.NS's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs PSPPROJECT.BO Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, PSPPROJECT.BO has a market cap of 30.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while PSPPROJECT.BO trades at ₹780.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas PSPPROJECT.BO's P/E ratio is 73.17. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PSPPROJECT.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is more volatile compared to PSPPROJECT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check PSPPROJECT.BO's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs EIEL.NS Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, EIEL.NS has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while EIEL.NS trades at ₹162.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas EIEL.NS's P/E ratio is 13.68. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EIEL.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is more volatile compared to EIEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check EIEL.NS's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs PATELENG.NS Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, PATELENG.NS has a market cap of 26.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while PATELENG.NS trades at ₹27.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas PATELENG.NS's P/E ratio is 9.80. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PATELENG.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is more volatile compared to PATELENG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check PATELENG.NS's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs PATELENG.BO Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, PATELENG.BO has a market cap of 26.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while PATELENG.BO trades at ₹27.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas PATELENG.BO's P/E ratio is 9.80. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PATELENG.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is more volatile compared to PATELENG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check PATELENG.BO's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs DREDGECORP.BO Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, DREDGECORP.BO has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while DREDGECORP.BO trades at ₹970.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas DREDGECORP.BO's P/E ratio is -39.04. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DREDGECORP.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is less volatile compared to DREDGECORP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check DREDGECORP.BO's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs DREDGECORP.NS Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, DREDGECORP.NS has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while DREDGECORP.NS trades at ₹965.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas DREDGECORP.NS's P/E ratio is -39.00. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DREDGECORP.NS's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is less volatile compared to DREDGECORP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check DREDGECORP.NS's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs GEPIL.BO Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, GEPIL.BO has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while GEPIL.BO trades at ₹360.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas GEPIL.BO's P/E ratio is 75.97. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GEPIL.BO's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is less volatile compared to GEPIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check GEPIL.BO's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs GEPIL.NS Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, GEPIL.NS has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while GEPIL.NS trades at ₹359.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas GEPIL.NS's P/E ratio is 76.32. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GEPIL.NS's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is less volatile compared to GEPIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check GEPIL.NS's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs BGRENERGY.BO Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, BGRENERGY.BO has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while BGRENERGY.BO trades at ₹334.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas BGRENERGY.BO's P/E ratio is -2.81. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BGRENERGY.BO's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is less volatile compared to BGRENERGY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check BGRENERGY.BO's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs BGRENERGY.NS Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, BGRENERGY.NS has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while BGRENERGY.NS trades at ₹335.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas BGRENERGY.NS's P/E ratio is -2.81. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BGRENERGY.NS's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is less volatile compared to BGRENERGY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check BGRENERGY.NS's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs CAPACITE.NS Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, CAPACITE.NS has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while CAPACITE.NS trades at ₹251.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas CAPACITE.NS's P/E ratio is 10.23. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CAPACITE.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is less volatile compared to CAPACITE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check CAPACITE.NS's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs CAPACITE.BO Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, CAPACITE.BO has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while CAPACITE.BO trades at ₹251.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas CAPACITE.BO's P/E ratio is 10.23. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CAPACITE.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is less volatile compared to CAPACITE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check CAPACITE.BO's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs JMCPROJECT.NS Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, JMCPROJECT.NS has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while JMCPROJECT.NS trades at ₹119.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas JMCPROJECT.NS's P/E ratio is 18.62. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JMCPROJECT.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is less volatile compared to JMCPROJECT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check JMCPROJECT.NS's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs KPEL.NS Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, KPEL.NS has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while KPEL.NS trades at ₹299.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas KPEL.NS's P/E ratio is 13.42. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KPEL.NS's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is less volatile compared to KPEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check KPEL.NS's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs INDIANHUME.NS Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, INDIANHUME.NS has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while INDIANHUME.NS trades at ₹361.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas INDIANHUME.NS's P/E ratio is 3.31. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to INDIANHUME.NS's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is more volatile compared to INDIANHUME.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check INDIANHUME.NS's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs INDIANHUME.BO Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, INDIANHUME.BO has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while INDIANHUME.BO trades at ₹360.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas INDIANHUME.BO's P/E ratio is 3.30. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to INDIANHUME.BO's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is more volatile compared to INDIANHUME.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check INDIANHUME.BO's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs MBEL.NS Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, MBEL.NS has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while MBEL.NS trades at ₹356.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas MBEL.NS's P/E ratio is 19.73. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MBEL.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is more volatile compared to MBEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check MBEL.NS's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs CEINSYSTECH.BO Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, CEINSYSTECH.BO has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while CEINSYSTECH.BO trades at ₹1,010.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas CEINSYSTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 17.04. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CEINSYSTECH.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is more volatile compared to CEINSYSTECH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check CEINSYSTECH.BO's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs EMSLIMITED.NS Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, EMSLIMITED.NS has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while EMSLIMITED.NS trades at ₹311.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas EMSLIMITED.NS's P/E ratio is 13.14. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EMSLIMITED.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is less volatile compared to EMSLIMITED.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check EMSLIMITED.NS's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs EMSLIMITED.BO Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, EMSLIMITED.BO has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while EMSLIMITED.BO trades at ₹312.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas EMSLIMITED.BO's P/E ratio is 13.13. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EMSLIMITED.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is less volatile compared to EMSLIMITED.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check EMSLIMITED.BO's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs GARUDA.BO Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, GARUDA.BO has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while GARUDA.BO trades at ₹190.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas GARUDA.BO's P/E ratio is 19.95. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GARUDA.BO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is less volatile compared to GARUDA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check GARUDA.BO's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs GARUDA.NS Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, GARUDA.NS has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while GARUDA.NS trades at ₹190.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas GARUDA.NS's P/E ratio is 19.92. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GARUDA.NS's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is less volatile compared to GARUDA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check GARUDA.NS's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs SIMPLEXINF.NS Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, SIMPLEXINF.NS has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while SIMPLEXINF.NS trades at ₹208.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas SIMPLEXINF.NS's P/E ratio is 19.55. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SIMPLEXINF.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is less volatile compared to SIMPLEXINF.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check SIMPLEXINF.NS's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs GPTINFRA.NS Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, GPTINFRA.NS has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while GPTINFRA.NS trades at ₹123.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas GPTINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 17.43. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GPTINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is less volatile compared to GPTINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check GPTINFRA.NS's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs GPTINFRA.BO Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, GPTINFRA.BO has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while GPTINFRA.BO trades at ₹123.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas GPTINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 17.43. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GPTINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is more volatile compared to GPTINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check GPTINFRA.BO's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs SIMPLEXINF.BO Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, SIMPLEXINF.BO has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while SIMPLEXINF.BO trades at ₹206.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas SIMPLEXINF.BO's P/E ratio is 27.58. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SIMPLEXINF.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is less volatile compared to SIMPLEXINF.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check SIMPLEXINF.BO's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs ABINFRA.NS Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, ABINFRA.NS has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while ABINFRA.NS trades at ₹20.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas ABINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 56.27. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ABINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is less volatile compared to ABINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check ABINFRA.NS's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs SEPC.NS Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, SEPC.NS has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while SEPC.NS trades at ₹8.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas SEPC.NS's P/E ratio is 30.89. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SEPC.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is less volatile compared to SEPC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check SEPC.NS's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs SEPC.BO Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, SEPC.BO has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while SEPC.BO trades at ₹8.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas SEPC.BO's P/E ratio is 30.89. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SEPC.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is less volatile compared to SEPC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check SEPC.BO's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs SPMLINFRA.BO Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, SPMLINFRA.BO has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while SPMLINFRA.BO trades at ₹180.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas SPMLINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 31.51. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SPMLINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is less volatile compared to SPMLINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check SPMLINFRA.BO's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs SPMLINFRA.NS Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, SPMLINFRA.NS has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while SPMLINFRA.NS trades at ₹181.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas SPMLINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 23.71. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is less volatile compared to SPMLINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check SPMLINFRA.NS's competition here
CEIGALL.NS vs VINDHYATEL.BO Comparison February 2026
CEIGALL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEIGALL.NS stands at 50B. In comparison, VINDHYATEL.BO has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CEIGALL.NS is priced at ₹286.20, while VINDHYATEL.BO trades at ₹1,083.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEIGALL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.21, whereas VINDHYATEL.BO's P/E ratio is 4.72. In terms of profitability, CEIGALL.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VINDHYATEL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CEIGALL.NS is more volatile compared to VINDHYATEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEIGALL.NS.Check VINDHYATEL.BO's competition here