Crown Holdings, Inc.
Crown Holdings, Inc. (CCK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CCK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaging & Containers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCK | $102.98 | -1.17% | 12B | 21.67 | $4.75 | +0.99% |
| IP | $55.68 | +1.61% | 29.4B | 47.61 | $1.17 | +3.32% |
| SW | $48.85 | +1.71% | 25.5B | 59.56 | $0.82 | +3.01% |
| AMCR | $9.74 | -0.20% | 22.5B | 17.42 | $0.56 | +5.22% |
| BLL | $69.49 | -3.37% | 21.8B | 28.62 | $2.43 | +1.36% |
| PKG | $206.53 | +0.29% | 18.6B | 20.58 | $10.03 | +2.42% |
| BALL | $59.01 | +0.10% | 16.4B | 33.54 | $1.76 | +1.36% |
| WRK | $51.51 | +3.54% | 13.3B | 42.57 | $1.21 | N/A |
| BERY | $67.58 | -2.93% | 7.8B | 14.95 | $4.52 | +1.70% |
| GPK | $23.32 | +0.47% | 7B | 11.43 | $2.04 | +1.80% |
Stock Comparison
CCK vs IP Comparison July 2025
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 12B. In comparison, IP has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $102.98, while IP trades at $55.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.67, whereas IP's P/E ratio is 47.61. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to IP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.Check IP's competition here
CCK vs SW Comparison July 2025
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 12B. In comparison, SW has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $102.98, while SW trades at $48.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.67, whereas SW's P/E ratio is 59.56. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.Check SW's competition here
CCK vs AMCR Comparison July 2025
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 12B. In comparison, AMCR has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $102.98, while AMCR trades at $9.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.67, whereas AMCR's P/E ratio is 17.42. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AMCR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is more volatile compared to AMCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.Check AMCR's competition here
CCK vs BLL Comparison July 2025
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 12B. In comparison, BLL has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $102.98, while BLL trades at $69.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.67, whereas BLL's P/E ratio is 28.62. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BLL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to BLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.Check BLL's competition here
CCK vs PKG Comparison July 2025
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 12B. In comparison, PKG has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $102.98, while PKG trades at $206.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.67, whereas PKG's P/E ratio is 20.58. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PKG's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is more volatile compared to PKG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.Check PKG's competition here
CCK vs BALL Comparison July 2025
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 12B. In comparison, BALL has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $102.98, while BALL trades at $59.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.67, whereas BALL's P/E ratio is 33.54. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BALL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is more volatile compared to BALL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.Check BALL's competition here
CCK vs WRK Comparison July 2025
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 12B. In comparison, WRK has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $102.98, while WRK trades at $51.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.67, whereas WRK's P/E ratio is 42.57. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WRK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to WRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.Check WRK's competition here
CCK vs BERY Comparison July 2025
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 12B. In comparison, BERY has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $102.98, while BERY trades at $67.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.67, whereas BERY's P/E ratio is 14.95. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BERY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to BERY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.Check BERY's competition here
CCK vs GPK Comparison July 2025
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 12B. In comparison, GPK has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $102.98, while GPK trades at $23.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.67, whereas GPK's P/E ratio is 11.43. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GPK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is more volatile compared to GPK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.Check GPK's competition here
CCK vs SLGN Comparison July 2025
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 12B. In comparison, SLGN has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $102.98, while SLGN trades at $55.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.67, whereas SLGN's P/E ratio is 20.72. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SLGN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is more volatile compared to SLGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.Check SLGN's competition here
CCK vs SON Comparison July 2025
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 12B. In comparison, SON has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $102.98, while SON trades at $48.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.67, whereas SON's P/E ratio is 161.03. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SON's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to SON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.Check SON's competition here
CCK vs REYN Comparison July 2025
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 12B. In comparison, REYN has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $102.98, while REYN trades at $22.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.67, whereas REYN's P/E ratio is 13.94. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.20%, compared to REYN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is more volatile compared to REYN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.Check REYN's competition here
CCK vs SEE Comparison July 2025
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 12B. In comparison, SEE has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $102.98, while SEE trades at $31.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.67, whereas SEE's P/E ratio is 15.06. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SEE's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is more volatile compared to SEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.Check SEE's competition here
CCK vs PTVE Comparison July 2025
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 12B. In comparison, PTVE has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $102.98, while PTVE trades at $18.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.67, whereas PTVE's P/E ratio is -23.39. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PTVE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is more volatile compared to PTVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.Check PTVE's competition here
CCK vs GEF-B Comparison July 2025
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 12B. In comparison, GEF-B has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $102.98, while GEF-B trades at $69.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.67, whereas GEF-B's P/E ratio is 12.59. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GEF-B's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is more volatile compared to GEF-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.Check GEF-B's competition here
CCK vs GEF Comparison July 2025
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 12B. In comparison, GEF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $102.98, while GEF trades at $66.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.67, whereas GEF's P/E ratio is 18.10. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GEF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is more volatile compared to GEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.Check GEF's competition here
CCK vs OI Comparison July 2025
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 12B. In comparison, OI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $102.98, while OI trades at $14.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.67, whereas OI's P/E ratio is -11.66. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OI's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is more volatile compared to OI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.Check OI's competition here
CCK vs AMBP Comparison July 2025
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 12B. In comparison, AMBP has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $102.98, while AMBP trades at $3.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.67, whereas AMBP's P/E ratio is -125.33. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AMBP's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to AMBP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.Check AMBP's competition here
CCK vs TRS Comparison July 2025
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 12B. In comparison, TRS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $102.98, while TRS trades at $31.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.67, whereas TRS's P/E ratio is 40.82. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TRS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is more volatile compared to TRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.Check TRS's competition here
CCK vs FFHL Comparison July 2025
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 12B. In comparison, FFHL has a market cap of 695.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $102.98, while FFHL trades at $8.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.67, whereas FFHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FFHL's ROE of -79.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to FFHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.Check FFHL's competition here
CCK vs MYE Comparison July 2025
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 12B. In comparison, MYE has a market cap of 568.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $102.98, while MYE trades at $15.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.67, whereas MYE's P/E ratio is 54.29. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MYE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to MYE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.Check MYE's competition here
CCK vs KRT Comparison July 2025
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 12B. In comparison, KRT has a market cap of 566.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $102.98, while KRT trades at $28.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.67, whereas KRT's P/E ratio is 18.80. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KRT's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is more volatile compared to KRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.Check KRT's competition here
CCK vs PACK Comparison July 2025
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 12B. In comparison, PACK has a market cap of 325.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $102.98, while PACK trades at $3.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.67, whereas PACK's P/E ratio is -13.31. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PACK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to PACK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.Check PACK's competition here
CCK vs TUP Comparison July 2025
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 12B. In comparison, TUP has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $102.98, while TUP trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.67, whereas TUP's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TUP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to TUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.Check TUP's competition here
CCK vs YHGJ Comparison July 2025
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 12B. In comparison, YHGJ has a market cap of 19.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $102.98, while YHGJ trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.67, whereas YHGJ's P/E ratio is -11.67. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.20%, compared to YHGJ's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to YHGJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.Check YHGJ's competition here
CCK vs MGIH Comparison July 2025
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 12B. In comparison, MGIH has a market cap of 18.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $102.98, while MGIH trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.67, whereas MGIH's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MGIH's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to MGIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.Check MGIH's competition here
CCK vs DSS Comparison July 2025
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 12B. In comparison, DSS has a market cap of 10.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $102.98, while DSS trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.67, whereas DSS's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DSS's ROE of -1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to DSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.Check DSS's competition here
CCK vs OCTO Comparison July 2025
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 12B. In comparison, OCTO has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $102.98, while OCTO trades at $2.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.67, whereas OCTO's P/E ratio is -0.99. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OCTO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to OCTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.Check OCTO's competition here
CCK vs TYDE Comparison July 2025
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 12B. In comparison, TYDE has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $102.98, while TYDE trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.67, whereas TYDE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TYDE's ROE of +9.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to TYDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.Check TYDE's competition here
CCK vs ARD Comparison July 2025
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 12B. In comparison, ARD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $102.98, while ARD trades at $24.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.67, whereas ARD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ARD's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to ARD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.Check ARD's competition here