Crown Holdings, Inc.
Crown Holdings, Inc. CCK Peers
See (CCK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaging & Containers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCK | $99.53 | -0.18% | 11.58B | 21.45 | $4.64 | +1.02% |
| IP | $49.57 | -1.50% | 26.17B | 42.36 | $1.17 | +3.73% |
| SW | $46.63 | +0.04% | 24.34B | 56.87 | $0.82 | +2.22% |
| BLL | $69.49 | -3.37% | 21.85B | 28.62 | $2.43 | +1.50% |
| AMCR | $9.32 | +1.53% | 21.49B | 16.64 | $0.56 | +5.44% |
| PKG | $190.74 | -0.61% | 17.16B | 19.97 | $9.55 | +2.62% |
| BALL | $53.36 | +0.87% | 14.80B | 30.32 | $1.76 | +1.50% |
| WRK | $51.51 | +3.54% | 13.30B | 42.57 | $1.21 | N/A |
| BERY | $67.58 | -2.93% | 7.83B | 14.95 | $4.52 | +1.70% |
| GPK | $23.32 | +0.89% | 7.04B | 11.43 | $2.04 | +1.76% |
Stock Comparison
CCK vs IP Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 11.58B. In comparison, IP has a market cap of 26.17B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $99.53, while IP trades at $49.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.45, whereas IP's P/E ratio is 42.36. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to IP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to IP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs SW Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 11.58B. In comparison, SW has a market cap of 24.34B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $99.53, while SW trades at $46.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.45, whereas SW's P/E ratio is 56.87. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs BLL Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 11.58B. In comparison, BLL has a market cap of 21.85B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $99.53, while BLL trades at $69.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.45, whereas BLL's P/E ratio is 28.62. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BLL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to BLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs AMCR Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 11.58B. In comparison, AMCR has a market cap of 21.49B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $99.53, while AMCR trades at $9.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.45, whereas AMCR's P/E ratio is 16.64. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AMCR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to AMCR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs PKG Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 11.58B. In comparison, PKG has a market cap of 17.16B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $99.53, while PKG trades at $190.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.45, whereas PKG's P/E ratio is 19.97. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PKG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is more volatile compared to PKG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs BALL Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 11.58B. In comparison, BALL has a market cap of 14.80B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $99.53, while BALL trades at $53.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.45, whereas BALL's P/E ratio is 30.32. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BALL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to BALL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs WRK Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 11.58B. In comparison, WRK has a market cap of 13.30B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $99.53, while WRK trades at $51.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.45, whereas WRK's P/E ratio is 42.57. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WRK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to WRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs BERY Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 11.58B. In comparison, BERY has a market cap of 7.83B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $99.53, while BERY trades at $67.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.45, whereas BERY's P/E ratio is 14.95. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BERY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to BERY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs GPK Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 11.58B. In comparison, GPK has a market cap of 7.04B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $99.53, while GPK trades at $23.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.45, whereas GPK's P/E ratio is 11.43. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GPK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to GPK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs SLGN Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 11.58B. In comparison, SLGN has a market cap of 5.24B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $99.53, while SLGN trades at $49.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.45, whereas SLGN's P/E ratio is 19.01. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SLGN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to SLGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs REYN Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 11.58B. In comparison, REYN has a market cap of 4.88B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $99.53, while REYN trades at $23.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.45, whereas REYN's P/E ratio is 14.87. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to REYN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to REYN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs SEE Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 11.58B. In comparison, SEE has a market cap of 4.67B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $99.53, while SEE trades at $31.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.45, whereas SEE's P/E ratio is 15.41. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SEE's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to SEE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs SON Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 11.58B. In comparison, SON has a market cap of 4.52B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $99.53, while SON trades at $45.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.45, whereas SON's P/E ratio is 55.90. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SON's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to SON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs PTVE Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 11.58B. In comparison, PTVE has a market cap of 3.27B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $99.53, while PTVE trades at $18.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.45, whereas PTVE's P/E ratio is -23.39. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PTVE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is more volatile compared to PTVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs GEF Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 11.58B. In comparison, GEF has a market cap of 2.75B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $99.53, while GEF trades at $56.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.45, whereas GEF's P/E ratio is 15.58. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GEF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is more volatile compared to GEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs GEF-B Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 11.58B. In comparison, GEF-B has a market cap of 2.74B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $99.53, while GEF-B trades at $59.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.45, whereas GEF-B's P/E ratio is 10.99. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GEF-B's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to GEF-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs AMBP Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 11.58B. In comparison, AMBP has a market cap of 2.25B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $99.53, while AMBP trades at $3.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.45, whereas AMBP's P/E ratio is -94.00. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AMBP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to AMBP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs OI Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 11.58B. In comparison, OI has a market cap of 2.11B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $99.53, while OI trades at $13.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.45, whereas OI's P/E ratio is -10.92. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OI's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to OI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs TRS Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 11.58B. In comparison, TRS has a market cap of 1.01B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $99.53, while TRS trades at $24.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.45, whereas TRS's P/E ratio is 32.12. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TRS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to TRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs FFHL Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 11.58B. In comparison, FFHL has a market cap of 695.42M. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $99.53, while FFHL trades at $8.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.45, whereas FFHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FFHL's ROE of -79.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to FFHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs KRT Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 11.58B. In comparison, KRT has a market cap of 612.22M. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $99.53, while KRT trades at $30.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.45, whereas KRT's P/E ratio is 20.35. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KRT's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to KRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs MYE Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 11.58B. In comparison, MYE has a market cap of 461.67M. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $99.53, while MYE trades at $12.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.45, whereas MYE's P/E ratio is 44.11. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MYE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to MYE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs PACK Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 11.58B. In comparison, PACK has a market cap of 308.71M. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $99.53, while PACK trades at $3.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.45, whereas PACK's P/E ratio is -13.09. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PACK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to PACK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs YHGJ Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 11.58B. In comparison, YHGJ has a market cap of 25.37M. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $99.53, while YHGJ trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.45, whereas YHGJ's P/E ratio is -14.00. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to YHGJ's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to YHGJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs TUP Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 11.58B. In comparison, TUP has a market cap of 23.73M. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $99.53, while TUP trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.45, whereas TUP's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TUP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to TUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs MGIH Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 11.58B. In comparison, MGIH has a market cap of 19.43M. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $99.53, while MGIH trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.45, whereas MGIH's P/E ratio is -2.21. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MGIH's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to MGIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs DSS Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 11.58B. In comparison, DSS has a market cap of 8.64M. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $99.53, while DSS trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.45, whereas DSS's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DSS's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to DSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs OCTO Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 11.58B. In comparison, OCTO has a market cap of 4.31M. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $99.53, while OCTO trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.45, whereas OCTO's P/E ratio is 9.43. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OCTO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to OCTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs TYDE Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 11.58B. In comparison, TYDE has a market cap of 3.80M. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $99.53, while TYDE trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.45, whereas TYDE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TYDE's ROE of +8.80%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to TYDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.