Crown Holdings, Inc.
Crown Holdings, Inc. CCK Peers
See (CCK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaging & Containers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCK | $99.96 | +2.34% | 11.6B | 21.54 | $4.64 | +1.28% |
| IP | $47.35 | +0.53% | 25B | 40.47 | $1.17 | +3.91% |
| SW | $43.32 | +0.58% | 22.6B | 52.83 | $0.82 | +3.38% |
| BLL | $69.49 | -3.37% | 21.8B | 28.62 | $2.43 | +1.49% |
| AMCR | $9.12 | +0.87% | 21B | 16.28 | $0.56 | +5.57% |
| PKG | $196.41 | +0.88% | 17.7B | 20.54 | $9.56 | +2.54% |
| BALL | $53.74 | +0.47% | 14.9B | 30.53 | $1.76 | +1.49% |
| WRK | $51.51 | +3.54% | 13.3B | 42.57 | $1.21 | N/A |
| BERY | $67.58 | -2.93% | 7.8B | 14.95 | $4.52 | +1.32% |
| GPK | $22.24 | +0.59% | 6.7B | 10.90 | $2.04 | +1.84% |
Stock Comparison
CCK vs IP Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 11.6B. In comparison, IP has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $99.96, while IP trades at $47.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas IP's P/E ratio is 40.47. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to IP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is more volatile compared to IP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs SW Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 11.6B. In comparison, SW has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $99.96, while SW trades at $43.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas SW's P/E ratio is 52.83. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is more volatile compared to SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs BLL Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 11.6B. In comparison, BLL has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $99.96, while BLL trades at $69.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas BLL's P/E ratio is 28.62. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BLL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to BLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs AMCR Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 11.6B. In comparison, AMCR has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $99.96, while AMCR trades at $9.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas AMCR's P/E ratio is 16.28. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AMCR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is more volatile compared to AMCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs PKG Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 11.6B. In comparison, PKG has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $99.96, while PKG trades at $196.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas PKG's P/E ratio is 20.54. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PKG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is more volatile compared to PKG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs BALL Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 11.6B. In comparison, BALL has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $99.96, while BALL trades at $53.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas BALL's P/E ratio is 30.53. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BALL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is more volatile compared to BALL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs WRK Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 11.6B. In comparison, WRK has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $99.96, while WRK trades at $51.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas WRK's P/E ratio is 42.57. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WRK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to WRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs BERY Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 11.6B. In comparison, BERY has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $99.96, while BERY trades at $67.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas BERY's P/E ratio is 14.95. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BERY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to BERY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs GPK Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 11.6B. In comparison, GPK has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $99.96, while GPK trades at $22.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas GPK's P/E ratio is 10.90. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GPK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to GPK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs SLGN Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 11.6B. In comparison, SLGN has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $99.96, while SLGN trades at $54.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas SLGN's P/E ratio is 20.14. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SLGN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is more volatile compared to SLGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs SEE Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 11.6B. In comparison, SEE has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $99.96, while SEE trades at $32.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas SEE's P/E ratio is 15.66. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SEE's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is more volatile compared to SEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs REYN Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 11.6B. In comparison, REYN has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $99.96, while REYN trades at $21.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas REYN's P/E ratio is 13.67. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to REYN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is more volatile compared to REYN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs SON Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 11.6B. In comparison, SON has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $99.96, while SON trades at $45.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas SON's P/E ratio is 55.00. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SON's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is more volatile compared to SON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs PTVE Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 11.6B. In comparison, PTVE has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $99.96, while PTVE trades at $18.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas PTVE's P/E ratio is -23.39. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PTVE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is more volatile compared to PTVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs GEF Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 11.6B. In comparison, GEF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $99.96, while GEF trades at $66.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas GEF's P/E ratio is 18.35. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GEF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to GEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs GEF-B Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 11.6B. In comparison, GEF-B has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $99.96, while GEF-B trades at $68.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas GEF-B's P/E ratio is 12.63. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GEF-B's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to GEF-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs AMBP Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 11.6B. In comparison, AMBP has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $99.96, while AMBP trades at $3.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas AMBP's P/E ratio is -98.37. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AMBP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is more volatile compared to AMBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs OI Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 11.6B. In comparison, OI has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $99.96, while OI trades at $13.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas OI's P/E ratio is -10.90. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OI's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is more volatile compared to OI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs TRS Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 11.6B. In comparison, TRS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $99.96, while TRS trades at $25.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas TRS's P/E ratio is 33.69. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TRS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is more volatile compared to TRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs FFHL Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 11.6B. In comparison, FFHL has a market cap of 695.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $99.96, while FFHL trades at $8.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas FFHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FFHL's ROE of -79.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to FFHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs KRT Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 11.6B. In comparison, KRT has a market cap of 627.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $99.96, while KRT trades at $31.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas KRT's P/E ratio is 20.85. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KRT's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to KRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs MYE Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 11.6B. In comparison, MYE has a market cap of 526.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $99.96, while MYE trades at $14.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas MYE's P/E ratio is 50.29. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MYE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to MYE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs PACK Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 11.6B. In comparison, PACK has a market cap of 306.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $99.96, while PACK trades at $3.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas PACK's P/E ratio is -12.55. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PACK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to PACK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs TUP Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 11.6B. In comparison, TUP has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $99.96, while TUP trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas TUP's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TUP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to TUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs YHGJ Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 11.6B. In comparison, YHGJ has a market cap of 21.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $99.96, while YHGJ trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas YHGJ's P/E ratio is -13.89. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to YHGJ's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to YHGJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs MGIH Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 11.6B. In comparison, MGIH has a market cap of 17.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $99.96, while MGIH trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas MGIH's P/E ratio is -1.97. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MGIH's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to MGIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs DSS Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 11.6B. In comparison, DSS has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $99.96, while DSS trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas DSS's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DSS's ROE of -1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to DSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs OCTO Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 11.6B. In comparison, OCTO has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $99.96, while OCTO trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas OCTO's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OCTO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to OCTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs TYDE Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 11.6B. In comparison, TYDE has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $99.96, while TYDE trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas TYDE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TYDE's ROE of +9.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to TYDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs ARD Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 11.6B. In comparison, ARD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $99.96, while ARD trades at $24.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 21.54, whereas ARD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ARD's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to ARD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.