Crown Holdings, Inc.
Crown Holdings, Inc. CCK Peers
See (CCK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaging & Containers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCK | $106.91 | +1.50% | 12.5B | 23.05 | $4.64 | +0.96% |
| IP | $50.39 | +1.90% | 26.6B | 43.07 | $1.17 | +3.67% |
| SW | $47.18 | +2.90% | 24.6B | 57.55 | $0.82 | +2.47% |
| AMCR | $9.69 | +2.32% | 22.3B | 17.29 | $0.56 | +5.24% |
| BLL | $69.49 | -3.37% | 21.8B | 28.62 | $2.43 | +1.36% |
| PKG | $201.94 | -0.40% | 18.2B | 21.10 | $9.57 | +2.47% |
| BALL | $58.74 | +1.49% | 16.3B | 33.38 | $1.76 | +1.36% |
| WRK | $51.51 | +3.54% | 13.3B | 42.57 | $1.21 | N/A |
| BERY | $67.58 | -2.93% | 7.8B | 14.95 | $4.52 | +1.70% |
| GPK | $22.03 | +0.82% | 6.6B | 10.79 | $2.04 | +1.91% |
Stock Comparison
CCK vs IP Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 12.5B. In comparison, IP has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $106.91, while IP trades at $50.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.05, whereas IP's P/E ratio is 43.07. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to IP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to IP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs SW Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 12.5B. In comparison, SW has a market cap of 24.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $106.91, while SW trades at $47.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.05, whereas SW's P/E ratio is 57.55. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs AMCR Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 12.5B. In comparison, AMCR has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $106.91, while AMCR trades at $9.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.05, whereas AMCR's P/E ratio is 17.29. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AMCR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to AMCR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs BLL Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 12.5B. In comparison, BLL has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $106.91, while BLL trades at $69.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.05, whereas BLL's P/E ratio is 28.62. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BLL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to BLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs PKG Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 12.5B. In comparison, PKG has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $106.91, while PKG trades at $201.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.05, whereas PKG's P/E ratio is 21.10. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PKG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is more volatile compared to PKG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs BALL Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 12.5B. In comparison, BALL has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $106.91, while BALL trades at $58.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.05, whereas BALL's P/E ratio is 33.38. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BALL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to BALL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs WRK Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 12.5B. In comparison, WRK has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $106.91, while WRK trades at $51.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.05, whereas WRK's P/E ratio is 42.57. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WRK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to WRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs BERY Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 12.5B. In comparison, BERY has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $106.91, while BERY trades at $67.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.05, whereas BERY's P/E ratio is 14.95. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BERY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to BERY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs GPK Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 12.5B. In comparison, GPK has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $106.91, while GPK trades at $22.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.05, whereas GPK's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GPK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to GPK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs SLGN Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 12.5B. In comparison, SLGN has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $106.91, while SLGN trades at $56.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.05, whereas SLGN's P/E ratio is 21.12. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SLGN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to SLGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs SEE Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 12.5B. In comparison, SEE has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $106.91, while SEE trades at $32.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.05, whereas SEE's P/E ratio is 15.94. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SEE's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to SEE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs SON Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 12.5B. In comparison, SON has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $106.91, while SON trades at $46.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.05, whereas SON's P/E ratio is 56.87. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SON's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to SON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs REYN Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 12.5B. In comparison, REYN has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $106.91, while REYN trades at $21.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.05, whereas REYN's P/E ratio is 13.73. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to REYN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to REYN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs GEF Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 12.5B. In comparison, GEF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $106.91, while GEF trades at $69.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.05, whereas GEF's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GEF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is more volatile compared to GEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs GEF-B Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 12.5B. In comparison, GEF-B has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $106.91, while GEF-B trades at $72.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.05, whereas GEF-B's P/E ratio is 13.19. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GEF-B's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is more volatile compared to GEF-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs PTVE Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 12.5B. In comparison, PTVE has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $106.91, while PTVE trades at $18.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.05, whereas PTVE's P/E ratio is -23.39. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PTVE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is more volatile compared to PTVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs AMBP Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 12.5B. In comparison, AMBP has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $106.91, while AMBP trades at $4.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.05, whereas AMBP's P/E ratio is -110.87. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AMBP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to AMBP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs OI Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 12.5B. In comparison, OI has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $106.91, while OI trades at $15.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.05, whereas OI's P/E ratio is -12.45. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OI's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to OI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs TRS Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 12.5B. In comparison, TRS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $106.91, while TRS trades at $29.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.05, whereas TRS's P/E ratio is 38.64. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TRS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to TRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs FFHL Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 12.5B. In comparison, FFHL has a market cap of 695.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $106.91, while FFHL trades at $8.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.05, whereas FFHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FFHL's ROE of -79.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to FFHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs MYE Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 12.5B. In comparison, MYE has a market cap of 584.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $106.91, while MYE trades at $15.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.05, whereas MYE's P/E ratio is 55.80. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MYE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to MYE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs KRT Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 12.5B. In comparison, KRT has a market cap of 581.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $106.91, while KRT trades at $28.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.05, whereas KRT's P/E ratio is 19.31. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KRT's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to KRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs PACK Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 12.5B. In comparison, PACK has a market cap of 312.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $106.91, while PACK trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.05, whereas PACK's P/E ratio is -12.79. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PACK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to PACK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs TUP Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 12.5B. In comparison, TUP has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $106.91, while TUP trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.05, whereas TUP's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TUP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to TUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs YHGJ Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 12.5B. In comparison, YHGJ has a market cap of 20.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $106.91, while YHGJ trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.05, whereas YHGJ's P/E ratio is -13.30. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to YHGJ's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to YHGJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs MGIH Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 12.5B. In comparison, MGIH has a market cap of 17.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $106.91, while MGIH trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.05, whereas MGIH's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MGIH's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to MGIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs DSS Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 12.5B. In comparison, DSS has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $106.91, while DSS trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.05, whereas DSS's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DSS's ROE of -1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to DSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs TYDE Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 12.5B. In comparison, TYDE has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $106.91, while TYDE trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.05, whereas TYDE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TYDE's ROE of +9.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to TYDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs OCTO Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 12.5B. In comparison, OCTO has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $106.91, while OCTO trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.05, whereas OCTO's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OCTO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to OCTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.
CCK vs ARD Comparison
CCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCK stands at 12.5B. In comparison, ARD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CCK is priced at $106.91, while ARD trades at $24.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCK currently has a P/E ratio of 23.05, whereas ARD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCK's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ARD's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CCK is less volatile compared to ARD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCK.