Caleres, Inc.
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for CAL
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for CAL
Caleres, Inc. (CAL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CAL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Footwear & Accessories Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAL | $10.74 | -2.89% | 364M | -51.14 | -$0.21 | +2.61% |
| NKE | $44.19 | -0.99% | 65.3B | 29.07 | $1.52 | +3.67% |
| DECK | $98.31 | -2.58% | 14.3B | 13.96 | $7.04 | N/A |
| SKX | $63.13 | -0.11% | 9.5B | 14.41 | $4.38 | N/A |
| BIRK | $34.62 | -3.05% | 6.4B | 14.73 | $2.35 | N/A |
| CROX | $83.66 | +0.12% | 4.3B | -55.77 | -$1.50 | N/A |
| SHOO | $33.99 | -0.21% | 2.5B | 53.95 | $0.63 | +2.47% |
| WINA | $430.43 | -0.61% | 1.5B | 38.16 | $11.28 | +3.22% |
| WWW | $15.95 | -2.63% | 1.3B | 13.99 | $1.14 | +2.51% |
| WEYS | $32.37 | +0.56% | 308.5M | 13.43 | $2.41 | +9.51% |
Stock Comparison
CAL vs NKE Comparison April 2026
CAL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAL stands at 364M. In comparison, NKE has a market cap of 65.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAL is priced at $10.74, while NKE trades at $44.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAL currently has a P/E ratio of -51.14, whereas NKE's P/E ratio is 29.07. In terms of profitability, CAL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NKE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CAL is more volatile compared to NKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAL.Check NKE's competition here
CAL vs DECK Comparison April 2026
CAL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAL stands at 364M. In comparison, DECK has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAL is priced at $10.74, while DECK trades at $98.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAL currently has a P/E ratio of -51.14, whereas DECK's P/E ratio is 13.96. In terms of profitability, CAL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DECK's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CAL is more volatile compared to DECK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAL.Check DECK's competition here
CAL vs SKX Comparison April 2026
CAL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAL stands at 364M. In comparison, SKX has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAL is priced at $10.74, while SKX trades at $63.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAL currently has a P/E ratio of -51.14, whereas SKX's P/E ratio is 14.41. In terms of profitability, CAL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SKX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CAL is more volatile compared to SKX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAL.Check SKX's competition here
CAL vs BIRK Comparison April 2026
CAL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAL stands at 364M. In comparison, BIRK has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CAL is priced at $10.74, while BIRK trades at $34.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAL currently has a P/E ratio of -51.14, whereas BIRK's P/E ratio is 14.73. In terms of profitability, CAL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BIRK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CAL is less volatile compared to BIRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAL.Check BIRK's competition here
CAL vs CROX Comparison April 2026
CAL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAL stands at 364M. In comparison, CROX has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAL is priced at $10.74, while CROX trades at $83.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAL currently has a P/E ratio of -51.14, whereas CROX's P/E ratio is -55.77. In terms of profitability, CAL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CROX's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CAL is more volatile compared to CROX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAL.Check CROX's competition here
CAL vs SHOO Comparison April 2026
CAL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAL stands at 364M. In comparison, SHOO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAL is priced at $10.74, while SHOO trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAL currently has a P/E ratio of -51.14, whereas SHOO's P/E ratio is 53.95. In terms of profitability, CAL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SHOO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CAL is less volatile compared to SHOO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAL.Check SHOO's competition here
CAL vs WINA Comparison April 2026
CAL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAL stands at 364M. In comparison, WINA has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAL is priced at $10.74, while WINA trades at $430.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAL currently has a P/E ratio of -51.14, whereas WINA's P/E ratio is 38.16. In terms of profitability, CAL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to WINA's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CAL is more volatile compared to WINA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAL.Check WINA's competition here
CAL vs WWW Comparison April 2026
CAL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAL stands at 364M. In comparison, WWW has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAL is priced at $10.74, while WWW trades at $15.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAL currently has a P/E ratio of -51.14, whereas WWW's P/E ratio is 13.99. In terms of profitability, CAL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to WWW's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CAL is less volatile compared to WWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAL.Check WWW's competition here
CAL vs WEYS Comparison April 2026
CAL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAL stands at 364M. In comparison, WEYS has a market cap of 308.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CAL is priced at $10.74, while WEYS trades at $32.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAL currently has a P/E ratio of -51.14, whereas WEYS's P/E ratio is 13.43. In terms of profitability, CAL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to WEYS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CAL is more volatile compared to WEYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAL.Check WEYS's competition here
CAL vs RCKY Comparison April 2026
CAL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAL stands at 364M. In comparison, RCKY has a market cap of 291.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CAL is priced at $10.74, while RCKY trades at $38.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAL currently has a P/E ratio of -51.14, whereas RCKY's P/E ratio is 13.07. In terms of profitability, CAL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RCKY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CAL is more volatile compared to RCKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAL.Check RCKY's competition here
CAL vs MAMK Comparison April 2026
CAL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAL stands at 364M. In comparison, MAMK has a market cap of 201.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CAL is priced at $10.74, while MAMK trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAL currently has a P/E ratio of -51.14, whereas MAMK's P/E ratio is 216.67. In terms of profitability, CAL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MAMK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAL is more volatile compared to MAMK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAL.Check MAMK's competition here
CAL vs VRA Comparison April 2026
CAL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAL stands at 364M. In comparison, VRA has a market cap of 94.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CAL is priced at $10.74, while VRA trades at $3.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAL currently has a P/E ratio of -51.14, whereas VRA's P/E ratio is -2.90. In terms of profitability, CAL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to VRA's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CAL is less volatile compared to VRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAL.Check VRA's competition here
CAL vs SORA Comparison April 2026
CAL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAL stands at 364M. In comparison, SORA has a market cap of 51.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CAL is priced at $10.74, while SORA trades at $2.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAL currently has a P/E ratio of -51.14, whereas SORA's P/E ratio is -206.00. In terms of profitability, CAL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SORA's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CAL is more volatile compared to SORA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAL.Check SORA's competition here
CAL vs FORD Comparison April 2026
CAL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAL stands at 364M. In comparison, FORD has a market cap of 15.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CAL is priced at $10.74, while FORD trades at $9.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAL currently has a P/E ratio of -51.14, whereas FORD's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, CAL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FORD's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CAL is less volatile compared to FORD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAL.Check FORD's competition here
CAL vs FWDI Comparison April 2026
CAL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAL stands at 364M. In comparison, FWDI has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CAL is priced at $10.74, while FWDI trades at $4.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAL currently has a P/E ratio of -51.14, whereas FWDI's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, CAL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FWDI's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CAL is less volatile compared to FWDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAL.Check FWDI's competition here
CAL vs AREBW Comparison April 2026
CAL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAL stands at 364M. In comparison, AREBW has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CAL is priced at $10.74, while AREBW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAL currently has a P/E ratio of -51.14, whereas AREBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AREBW's ROE of +40.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CAL is less volatile compared to AREBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAL.Check AREBW's competition here
CAL vs AREB Comparison April 2026
CAL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAL stands at 364M. In comparison, AREB has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, CAL is priced at $10.74, while AREB trades at $6.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAL currently has a P/E ratio of -51.14, whereas AREB's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CAL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AREB's ROE of +40.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CAL is less volatile compared to AREB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAL.Check AREB's competition here