Brookfield Property Partners L.P.
Brookfield Property Partners L.P. BPYPP Peers
See (BPYPP) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Real Estate - Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BPYPP | $15.15 | +0.93% | 5.6B | 6.99 | $2.20 | +10.55% |
| DUO | $2.25 | +8.70% | 62.1B | 0.29 | $7.68 | N/A |
| CBRE | $142.51 | +0.63% | 42.5B | 43.57 | $3.27 | N/A |
| CSGP | $81.42 | -0.60% | 34.4B | 290.79 | $0.28 | N/A |
| JLL | $259.00 | +0.83% | 12.3B | 23.41 | $11.06 | N/A |
| FSV | $176.15 | +0.26% | 8B | 60.79 | $2.90 | +0.59% |
| BEKE | $17.65 | -0.65% | 6.7B | 33.30 | $0.53 | +2.04% |
| CIGI | $130.51 | -0.41% | 6.4B | 45.26 | $2.88 | +0.23% |
| BPYPO | $15.11 | -0.40% | 5.6B | 6.93 | $2.20 | +10.55% |
| BPYPN | $13.44 | +0.60% | 5B | 6.19 | $2.20 | +10.55% |
Stock Comparison
BPYPP vs DUO Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.6B. In comparison, DUO has a market cap of 62.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $15.15, while DUO trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas DUO's P/E ratio is 0.29. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to DUO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to DUO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs CBRE Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.6B. In comparison, CBRE has a market cap of 42.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $15.15, while CBRE trades at $142.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas CBRE's P/E ratio is 43.57. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CBRE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is more volatile compared to CBRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs CSGP Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.6B. In comparison, CSGP has a market cap of 34.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $15.15, while CSGP trades at $81.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas CSGP's P/E ratio is 290.79. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CSGP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is more volatile compared to CSGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs JLL Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.6B. In comparison, JLL has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $15.15, while JLL trades at $259.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas JLL's P/E ratio is 23.41. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to JLL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is more volatile compared to JLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs FSV Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.6B. In comparison, FSV has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $15.15, while FSV trades at $176.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas FSV's P/E ratio is 60.79. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to FSV's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to FSV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs BEKE Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.6B. In comparison, BEKE has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $15.15, while BEKE trades at $17.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas BEKE's P/E ratio is 33.30. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to BEKE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is more volatile compared to BEKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs CIGI Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.6B. In comparison, CIGI has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $15.15, while CIGI trades at $130.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas CIGI's P/E ratio is 45.26. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CIGI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is more volatile compared to CIGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs BPYPO Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.6B. In comparison, BPYPO has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $15.15, while BPYPO trades at $15.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas BPYPO's P/E ratio is 6.93. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to BPYPO's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is more volatile compared to BPYPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs BPYPN Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.6B. In comparison, BPYPN has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $15.15, while BPYPN trades at $13.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas BPYPN's P/E ratio is 6.19. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to BPYPN's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to BPYPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs TCN Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.6B. In comparison, TCN has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $15.15, while TCN trades at $11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas TCN's P/E ratio is 27.44. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to TCN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is more volatile compared to TCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs CWK Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.6B. In comparison, CWK has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $15.15, while CWK trades at $11.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas CWK's P/E ratio is 16.66. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CWK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to CWK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs NMRK Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.6B. In comparison, NMRK has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $15.15, while NMRK trades at $12.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas NMRK's P/E ratio is 32.86. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to NMRK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is more volatile compared to NMRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs EXPI Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.6B. In comparison, EXPI has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $15.15, while EXPI trades at $9.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas EXPI's P/E ratio is -105.83. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to EXPI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to EXPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs RDFN Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.6B. In comparison, RDFN has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $15.15, while RDFN trades at $11.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas RDFN's P/E ratio is -7.36. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to RDFN's ROE of +2.74%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to RDFN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs RLGY Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.6B. In comparison, RLGY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $15.15, while RLGY trades at $12.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas RLGY's P/E ratio is 4.59. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to RLGY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to RLGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs MMI Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.6B. In comparison, MMI has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $15.15, while MMI trades at $32.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas MMI's P/E ratio is -189.50. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MMI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is more volatile compared to MMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs PGRU Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.6B. In comparison, PGRU has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $15.15, while PGRU trades at $6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas PGRU's P/E ratio is -67.00. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to PGRU's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is more volatile compared to PGRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs KW Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.6B. In comparison, KW has a market cap of 999.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $15.15, while KW trades at $7.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas KW's P/E ratio is -6.88. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to KW's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to KW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs REAX Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.6B. In comparison, REAX has a market cap of 879.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $15.15, while REAX trades at $4.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas REAX's P/E ratio is -60.93. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to REAX's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to REAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs INDT Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.6B. In comparison, INDT has a market cap of 683.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $15.15, while INDT trades at $66.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas INDT's P/E ratio is -209.34. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to INDT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is more volatile compared to INDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs QK Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.6B. In comparison, QK has a market cap of 636.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $15.15, while QK trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas QK's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to QK's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to QK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs RMR Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.6B. In comparison, RMR has a market cap of 549.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $15.15, while RMR trades at $17.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas RMR's P/E ratio is 14.36. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to RMR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is more volatile compared to RMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs FRPH Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.6B. In comparison, FRPH has a market cap of 515.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $15.15, while FRPH trades at $26.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas FRPH's P/E ratio is 75.06. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to FRPH's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is more volatile compared to FRPH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs HOUS Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.6B. In comparison, HOUS has a market cap of 418.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $15.15, while HOUS trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas HOUS's P/E ratio is -3.98. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to HOUS's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is more volatile compared to HOUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs OPEN Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.6B. In comparison, OPEN has a market cap of 412.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $15.15, while OPEN trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas OPEN's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to OPEN's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to OPEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs TCI Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.6B. In comparison, TCI has a market cap of 391M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $15.15, while TCI trades at $44.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas TCI's P/E ratio is 49.73. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to TCI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to TCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs MLP Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.6B. In comparison, MLP has a market cap of 352.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $15.15, while MLP trades at $17.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas MLP's P/E ratio is -23.78. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MLP's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to MLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs RMAX Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.6B. In comparison, RMAX has a market cap of 326.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $15.15, while RMAX trades at $8.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas RMAX's P/E ratio is 18.20. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to RMAX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is more volatile compared to RMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs FLJ Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.6B. In comparison, FLJ has a market cap of 258M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $15.15, while FLJ trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas FLJ's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to FLJ's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to FLJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs NEN Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.6B. In comparison, NEN has a market cap of 256.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $15.15, while NEN trades at $73.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas NEN's P/E ratio is 16.24. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to NEN's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is more volatile compared to NEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs SEG Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.6B. In comparison, SEG has a market cap of 243.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $15.15, while SEG trades at $19.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas SEG's P/E ratio is -1.73. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SEG's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to SEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs CIAN Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.6B. In comparison, CIAN has a market cap of 237.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $15.15, while CIAN trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas CIAN's P/E ratio is -4.86. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CIAN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to CIAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs OPAD-WT Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.6B. In comparison, OPAD-WT has a market cap of 234.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $15.15, while OPAD-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas OPAD-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to OPAD-WT's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to OPAD-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs DOUG Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.6B. In comparison, DOUG has a market cap of 205.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $15.15, while DOUG trades at $2.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas DOUG's P/E ratio is -4.83. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to DOUG's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to DOUG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs LODE Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.6B. In comparison, LODE has a market cap of 122.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $15.15, while LODE trades at $3.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas LODE's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LODE's ROE of -138743.50%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to LODE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs ASPS Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.6B. In comparison, ASPS has a market cap of 107.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $15.15, while ASPS trades at $9.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas ASPS's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ASPS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to ASPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs STHO Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.6B. In comparison, STHO has a market cap of 104.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $15.15, while STHO trades at $7.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas STHO's P/E ratio is -2.31. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to STHO's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is more volatile compared to STHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs RFL Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.6B. In comparison, RFL has a market cap of 95.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $15.15, while RFL trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas RFL's P/E ratio is -2.07. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to RFL's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to RFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs DOMA Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.6B. In comparison, DOMA has a market cap of 89.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $15.15, while DOMA trades at $6.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas DOMA's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to DOMA's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to DOMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs MAYS Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.6B. In comparison, MAYS has a market cap of 80.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $15.15, while MAYS trades at $37.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas MAYS's P/E ratio is -1333.33. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MAYS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is more volatile compared to MAYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs WE Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.6B. In comparison, WE has a market cap of 44.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $15.15, while WE trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas WE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to WE's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to WE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs FTHM Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.6B. In comparison, FTHM has a market cap of 40.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $15.15, while FTHM trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas FTHM's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to FTHM's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to FTHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs CHG Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.6B. In comparison, CHG has a market cap of 35.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $15.15, while CHG trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas CHG's P/E ratio is 43.33. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CHG's ROE of +3.50%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to CHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs OPAD Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.6B. In comparison, OPAD has a market cap of 31.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $15.15, while OPAD trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas OPAD's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to OPAD's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to OPAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs OMH Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.6B. In comparison, OMH has a market cap of 31.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $15.15, while OMH trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas OMH's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to OMH's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to OMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs LGPS Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.6B. In comparison, LGPS has a market cap of 20.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $15.15, while LGPS trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas LGPS's P/E ratio is 4.47. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LGPS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to LGPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs GYRO Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.6B. In comparison, GYRO has a market cap of 18.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $15.15, while GYRO trades at $8.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas GYRO's P/E ratio is 47.33. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to GYRO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is more volatile compared to GYRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs AIRE Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.6B. In comparison, AIRE has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $15.15, while AIRE trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas AIRE's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to AIRE's ROE of -2.42%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to AIRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs LEJU Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.6B. In comparison, LEJU has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $15.15, while LEJU trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas LEJU's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LEJU's ROE of -2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is more volatile compared to LEJU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs WETH Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.6B. In comparison, WETH has a market cap of 11.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $15.15, while WETH trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas WETH's P/E ratio is 3.56. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to WETH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to WETH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs GBR Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.6B. In comparison, GBR has a market cap of 5.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $15.15, while GBR trades at $1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas GBR's P/E ratio is -38.41. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to GBR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to GBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs ALBT Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.6B. In comparison, ALBT has a market cap of 5.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $15.15, while ALBT trades at $2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas ALBT's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ALBT's ROE of -2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to ALBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs AVCO Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.6B. In comparison, AVCO has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $15.15, while AVCO trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas AVCO's P/E ratio is -5.16. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to AVCO's ROE of -2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to AVCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs LRHC Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.6B. In comparison, LRHC has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $15.15, while LRHC trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas LRHC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LRHC's ROE of -3.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to LRHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs UOKA Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.6B. In comparison, UOKA has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $15.15, while UOKA trades at $2.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas UOKA's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to UOKA's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is more volatile compared to UOKA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs MDJH Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.6B. In comparison, MDJH has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $15.15, while MDJH trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas MDJH's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MDJH's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is more volatile compared to MDJH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs UK Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.6B. In comparison, UK has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $15.15, while UK trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas UK's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to UK's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is more volatile compared to UK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs UKOMW Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.6B. In comparison, UKOMW has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $15.15, while UKOMW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas UKOMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to UKOMW's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to UKOMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs SFRWW Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.6B. In comparison, SFRWW has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $15.15, while SFRWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas SFRWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SFRWW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to SFRWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs SFR Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.6B. In comparison, SFR has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $15.15, while SFR trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas SFR's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SFR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to SFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs XHG Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.6B. In comparison, XHG has a market cap of 5.6K. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $15.15, while XHG trades at $1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas XHG's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to XHG's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to XHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs OBAS Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.6B. In comparison, OBAS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $15.15, while OBAS trades at $12.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas OBAS's P/E ratio is -31.48. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to OBAS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is more volatile compared to OBAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs LMRKO Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.6B. In comparison, LMRKO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $15.15, while LMRKO trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas LMRKO's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LMRKO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is more volatile compared to LMRKO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs BPY Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.6B. In comparison, BPY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $15.15, while BPY trades at $18.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas BPY's P/E ratio is -11.28. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to BPY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is more volatile compared to BPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs LMRK Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.6B. In comparison, LMRK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $15.15, while LMRK trades at $16.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas LMRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LMRK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is more volatile compared to LMRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs IRCP Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.6B. In comparison, IRCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $15.15, while IRCP trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas IRCP's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to IRCP's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to IRCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs LMRKN Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.6B. In comparison, LMRKN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $15.15, while LMRKN trades at $25.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas LMRKN's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LMRKN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is more volatile compared to LMRKN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs NTP Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.6B. In comparison, NTP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $15.15, while NTP trades at $4.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas NTP's P/E ratio is 3.40. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to NTP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to NTP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs LMRKP Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.6B. In comparison, LMRKP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $15.15, while LMRKP trades at $25.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.99, whereas LMRKP's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LMRKP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is more volatile compared to LMRKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.