Brookfield Property Partners L.P.
Brookfield Property Partners L.P. BPYPP Peers
See (BPYPP) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Real Estate - Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BPYPP | $14.30 | +0.29% | 5.3B | 6.51 | $2.20 | +11.17% |
| CBRE | $124.94 | +0.31% | 37.2B | 38.09 | $3.28 | N/A |
| CSGP | $75.71 | +3.33% | 31.9B | 270.39 | $0.28 | N/A |
| JLL | $225.00 | +1.78% | 10.7B | 20.33 | $11.07 | N/A |
| FSV | $174.57 | -0.35% | 7.9B | 60.40 | $2.89 | +0.59% |
| BEKE | $18.36 | +2.00% | 7B | 34.64 | $0.53 | +1.95% |
| CIGI | $121.77 | +0.08% | 6B | 42.28 | $2.88 | +0.25% |
| BPYPO | $14.24 | -0.77% | 5.2B | 6.48 | $2.20 | +11.17% |
| BPYPN | $12.79 | -0.55% | 4.7B | 5.82 | $2.20 | +11.17% |
| TCN | $11.25 | +0.18% | 3.1B | 27.44 | $0.41 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
BPYPP vs CBRE Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, CBRE has a market cap of 37.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.30, while CBRE trades at $124.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas CBRE's P/E ratio is 38.09. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CBRE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is more volatile compared to CBRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs CSGP Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, CSGP has a market cap of 31.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.30, while CSGP trades at $75.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas CSGP's P/E ratio is 270.39. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CSGP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to CSGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs JLL Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, JLL has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.30, while JLL trades at $225.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas JLL's P/E ratio is 20.33. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to JLL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to JLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs FSV Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, FSV has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.30, while FSV trades at $174.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas FSV's P/E ratio is 60.40. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to FSV's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to FSV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs BEKE Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, BEKE has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.30, while BEKE trades at $18.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas BEKE's P/E ratio is 34.64. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to BEKE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to BEKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs CIGI Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, CIGI has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.30, while CIGI trades at $121.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas CIGI's P/E ratio is 42.28. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CIGI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to CIGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs BPYPO Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, BPYPO has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.30, while BPYPO trades at $14.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas BPYPO's P/E ratio is 6.48. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to BPYPO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to BPYPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs BPYPN Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, BPYPN has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.30, while BPYPN trades at $12.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas BPYPN's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to BPYPN's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is more volatile compared to BPYPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs TCN Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, TCN has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.30, while TCN trades at $11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas TCN's P/E ratio is 27.44. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TCN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is more volatile compared to TCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs CWK Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, CWK has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.30, while CWK trades at $10.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas CWK's P/E ratio is 14.36. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CWK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to CWK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs NMRK Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, NMRK has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.30, while NMRK trades at $11.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas NMRK's P/E ratio is 29.05. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NMRK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is more volatile compared to NMRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs EXPI Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, EXPI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.30, while EXPI trades at $8.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas EXPI's P/E ratio is -97.44. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to EXPI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to EXPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs RLGY Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, RLGY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.30, while RLGY trades at $12.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas RLGY's P/E ratio is 4.59. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to RLGY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to RLGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs RDFN Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, RDFN has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.30, while RDFN trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas RDFN's P/E ratio is -6.61. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to RDFN's ROE of +2.74%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to RDFN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs MMI Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, MMI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.30, while MMI trades at $29.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas MMI's P/E ratio is -173.09. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MMI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to MMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs PGRU Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, PGRU has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.30, while PGRU trades at $6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas PGRU's P/E ratio is -67.00. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to PGRU's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is more volatile compared to PGRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs REAX Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, REAX has a market cap of 909.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.30, while REAX trades at $4.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas REAX's P/E ratio is -63.00. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to REAX's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to REAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs KW Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, KW has a market cap of 877.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.30, while KW trades at $6.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas KW's P/E ratio is -6.04. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to KW's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to KW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs INDT Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, INDT has a market cap of 683.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.30, while INDT trades at $66.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas INDT's P/E ratio is -209.34. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to INDT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is more volatile compared to INDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs QK Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, QK has a market cap of 636.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.30, while QK trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas QK's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to QK's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to QK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs FRPH Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, FRPH has a market cap of 519.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.30, while FRPH trades at $27.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas FRPH's P/E ratio is 75.61. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to FRPH's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to FRPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs RMR Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, RMR has a market cap of 495.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.30, while RMR trades at $15.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas RMR's P/E ratio is 12.96. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to RMR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to RMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs OPEN Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, OPEN has a market cap of 431.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.30, while OPEN trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas OPEN's P/E ratio is -1.14. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to OPEN's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to OPEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs HOUS Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, HOUS has a market cap of 394.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.30, while HOUS trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas HOUS's P/E ratio is -3.76. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to HOUS's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to HOUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs MLP Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, MLP has a market cap of 325.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.30, while MLP trades at $16.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas MLP's P/E ratio is -21.97. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MLP's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to MLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs TCI Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, TCI has a market cap of 310.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.30, while TCI trades at $35.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas TCI's P/E ratio is 39.54. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TCI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to TCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs RMAX Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, RMAX has a market cap of 303.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.30, while RMAX trades at $7.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas RMAX's P/E ratio is 16.91. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to RMAX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to RMAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs XHG Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, XHG has a market cap of 261.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.30, while XHG trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas XHG's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to XHG's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to XHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs NEN Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, NEN has a market cap of 260.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.30, while NEN trades at $74.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas NEN's P/E ratio is 16.47. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NEN's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is more volatile compared to NEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs FLJ Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, FLJ has a market cap of 258M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.30, while FLJ trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas FLJ's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to FLJ's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to FLJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs SEG Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, SEG has a market cap of 252.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.30, while SEG trades at $19.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas SEG's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SEG's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to SEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs CIAN Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, CIAN has a market cap of 237.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.30, while CIAN trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas CIAN's P/E ratio is -4.86. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CIAN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to CIAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs DOUG Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, DOUG has a market cap of 235.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.30, while DOUG trades at $2.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas DOUG's P/E ratio is -5.53. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to DOUG's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to DOUG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs OPAD-WT Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, OPAD-WT has a market cap of 234.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.30, while OPAD-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas OPAD-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to OPAD-WT's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to OPAD-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs STHO Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, STHO has a market cap of 96.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.30, while STHO trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas STHO's P/E ratio is -2.13. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to STHO's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to STHO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs LODE Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, LODE has a market cap of 90M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.30, while LODE trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas LODE's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to LODE's ROE of -138743.50%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to LODE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs DOMA Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, DOMA has a market cap of 89.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.30, while DOMA trades at $6.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas DOMA's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to DOMA's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to DOMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs MAYS Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, MAYS has a market cap of 80.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.30, while MAYS trades at $39.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas MAYS's P/E ratio is -307.54. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MAYS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to MAYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs RFL Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, RFL has a market cap of 73.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.30, while RFL trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas RFL's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to RFL's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to RFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs ASPS Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, ASPS has a market cap of 67.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.30, while ASPS trades at $6.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas ASPS's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ASPS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is more volatile compared to ASPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs WE Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, WE has a market cap of 44.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.30, while WE trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas WE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to WE's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to WE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs CHG Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, CHG has a market cap of 35.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.30, while CHG trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas CHG's P/E ratio is 43.33. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CHG's ROE of +3.50%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to CHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs FTHM Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, FTHM has a market cap of 35.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.30, while FTHM trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas FTHM's P/E ratio is -1.28. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to FTHM's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to FTHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs OPAD Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, OPAD has a market cap of 27.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.30, while OPAD trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas OPAD's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to OPAD's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to OPAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs AIRE Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, AIRE has a market cap of 25.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.30, while AIRE trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas AIRE's P/E ratio is -2.47. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to AIRE's ROE of -2.42%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to AIRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs GYRO Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, GYRO has a market cap of 18.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.30, while GYRO trades at $8.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas GYRO's P/E ratio is 45.89. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to GYRO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is more volatile compared to GYRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs LEJU Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, LEJU has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.30, while LEJU trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas LEJU's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to LEJU's ROE of -2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is more volatile compared to LEJU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs OMH Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, OMH has a market cap of 13M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.30, while OMH trades at $2.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas OMH's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to OMH's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to OMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs WETH Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, WETH has a market cap of 11.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.30, while WETH trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas WETH's P/E ratio is 3.63. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to WETH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to WETH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs DUO Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, DUO has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.30, while DUO trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas DUO's P/E ratio is 0.42. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to DUO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is more volatile compared to DUO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs ALBT Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, ALBT has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.30, while ALBT trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas ALBT's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ALBT's ROE of -2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to ALBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs AVCO Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, AVCO has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.30, while AVCO trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas AVCO's P/E ratio is -5.16. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to AVCO's ROE of -2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to AVCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs GBR Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, GBR has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.30, while GBR trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas GBR's P/E ratio is -31.00. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to GBR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is more volatile compared to GBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs LRHC Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, LRHC has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.30, while LRHC trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas LRHC's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to LRHC's ROE of -3.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to LRHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs UOKA Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, UOKA has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.30, while UOKA trades at $2.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas UOKA's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to UOKA's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to UOKA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs MDJH Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, MDJH has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.30, while MDJH trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas MDJH's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MDJH's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is more volatile compared to MDJH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs UK Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, UK has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.30, while UK trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas UK's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to UK's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to UK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs SFR Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, SFR has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.30, while SFR trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas SFR's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SFR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to SFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs SFRWW Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, SFRWW has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.30, while SFRWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas SFRWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SFRWW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to SFRWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs UKOMW Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, UKOMW has a market cap of 15.3K. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.30, while UKOMW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas UKOMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to UKOMW's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to UKOMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs LGPS Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, LGPS has a market cap of 237. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.30, while LGPS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas LGPS's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to LGPS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is more volatile compared to LGPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs LMRKP Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, LMRKP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.30, while LMRKP trades at $25.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas LMRKP's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to LMRKP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is more volatile compared to LMRKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs NTP Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, NTP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.30, while NTP trades at $4.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas NTP's P/E ratio is 3.40. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NTP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to NTP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs LMRKO Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, LMRKO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.30, while LMRKO trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas LMRKO's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to LMRKO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is more volatile compared to LMRKO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs OBAS Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, OBAS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.30, while OBAS trades at $12.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas OBAS's P/E ratio is -31.48. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to OBAS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is more volatile compared to OBAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs BPY Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, BPY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.30, while BPY trades at $18.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas BPY's P/E ratio is -11.28. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to BPY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is more volatile compared to BPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs IRCP Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, IRCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.30, while IRCP trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas IRCP's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to IRCP's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to IRCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs LMRK Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, LMRK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.30, while LMRK trades at $16.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas LMRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to LMRK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is more volatile compared to LMRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs LMRKN Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, LMRKN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.30, while LMRKN trades at $25.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.51, whereas LMRKN's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.12%, compared to LMRKN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is more volatile compared to LMRKN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.