Brookfield Property Partners L.P.
Brookfield Property Partners L.P. BPYPP Peers
See (BPYPP) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Real Estate - Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BPYPP | $14.39 | -0.35% | 5.3B | 6.55 | $2.20 | +11.19% |
| CBRE | $144.59 | -0.03% | 43.1B | 44.20 | $3.27 | N/A |
| CSGP | $92.96 | +2.15% | 39.2B | 357.58 | $0.26 | N/A |
| JLL | $261.37 | +0.22% | 12.4B | 23.60 | $11.08 | N/A |
| FSV | $194.00 | +8.34% | 8.8B | 67.29 | $2.88 | +0.53% |
| BEKE | $19.75 | +0.87% | 7.5B | 37.31 | $0.53 | +1.81% |
| CIGI | $141.73 | +1.32% | 7B | 49.04 | $2.89 | +0.21% |
| BPYPO | $14.30 | +0.00% | 5.3B | 6.51 | $2.20 | +11.19% |
| BPYPN | $12.97 | +0.10% | 4.8B | 5.97 | $2.20 | +11.19% |
| TCN | $11.25 | +0.18% | 3.1B | 27.44 | $0.41 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
BPYPP vs CBRE Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, CBRE has a market cap of 43.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.39, while CBRE trades at $144.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas CBRE's P/E ratio is 44.20. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CBRE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to CBRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs CSGP Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, CSGP has a market cap of 39.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.39, while CSGP trades at $92.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas CSGP's P/E ratio is 357.58. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CSGP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to CSGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs JLL Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, JLL has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.39, while JLL trades at $261.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas JLL's P/E ratio is 23.60. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to JLL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to JLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs FSV Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, FSV has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.39, while FSV trades at $194.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas FSV's P/E ratio is 67.29. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to FSV's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to FSV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs BEKE Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, BEKE has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.39, while BEKE trades at $19.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas BEKE's P/E ratio is 37.31. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to BEKE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to BEKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs CIGI Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, CIGI has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.39, while CIGI trades at $141.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas CIGI's P/E ratio is 49.04. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CIGI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to CIGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs BPYPO Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, BPYPO has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.39, while BPYPO trades at $14.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas BPYPO's P/E ratio is 6.51. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to BPYPO's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to BPYPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs BPYPN Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, BPYPN has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.39, while BPYPN trades at $12.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas BPYPN's P/E ratio is 5.97. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to BPYPN's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is more volatile compared to BPYPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs TCN Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, TCN has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.39, while TCN trades at $11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas TCN's P/E ratio is 27.44. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to TCN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is more volatile compared to TCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs CWK Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, CWK has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.39, while CWK trades at $11.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas CWK's P/E ratio is 16.66. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CWK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to CWK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs NMRK Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, NMRK has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.39, while NMRK trades at $13.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas NMRK's P/E ratio is 35.45. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to NMRK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to NMRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs OPEN Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, OPEN has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.39, while OPEN trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas OPEN's P/E ratio is -4.65. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to OPEN's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to OPEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs EXPI Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, EXPI has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.39, while EXPI trades at $10.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas EXPI's P/E ratio is -121.56. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to EXPI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to EXPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs RDFN Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, RDFN has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.39, while RDFN trades at $11.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas RDFN's P/E ratio is -7.36. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to RDFN's ROE of +2.74%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is more volatile compared to RDFN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs RLGY Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, RLGY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.39, while RLGY trades at $12.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas RLGY's P/E ratio is 4.59. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to RLGY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to RLGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs MMI Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, MMI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.39, while MMI trades at $31.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas MMI's P/E ratio is -184.44. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MMI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to MMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs PGRU Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, PGRU has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.39, while PGRU trades at $6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas PGRU's P/E ratio is -67.00. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to PGRU's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is more volatile compared to PGRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs KW Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, KW has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.39, while KW trades at $7.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas KW's P/E ratio is -7.23. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to KW's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to KW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs REAX Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, REAX has a market cap of 865M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.39, while REAX trades at $4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas REAX's P/E ratio is -59.93. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to REAX's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to REAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs INDT Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, INDT has a market cap of 683.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.39, while INDT trades at $66.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas INDT's P/E ratio is -209.34. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to INDT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is more volatile compared to INDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs QK Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, QK has a market cap of 636.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.39, while QK trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas QK's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to QK's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to QK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs RMR Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, RMR has a market cap of 539M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.39, while RMR trades at $16.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas RMR's P/E ratio is 14.09. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to RMR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to RMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs FRPH Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, FRPH has a market cap of 520.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.39, while FRPH trades at $27.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas FRPH's P/E ratio is 75.81. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to FRPH's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to FRPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs HOUS Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, HOUS has a market cap of 517.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.39, while HOUS trades at $4.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas HOUS's P/E ratio is -4.92. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to HOUS's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to HOUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs TCI Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, TCI has a market cap of 359.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.39, while TCI trades at $41.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas TCI's P/E ratio is 45.71. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to TCI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to TCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs MLP Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, MLP has a market cap of 343.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.39, while MLP trades at $17.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas MLP's P/E ratio is -23.20. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MLP's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to MLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs RMAX Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, RMAX has a market cap of 331.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.39, while RMAX trades at $8.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas RMAX's P/E ratio is 18.48. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to RMAX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to RMAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs SEG Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, SEG has a market cap of 294.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.39, while SEG trades at $23.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas SEG's P/E ratio is -2.09. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SEG's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to SEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs NEN Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, NEN has a market cap of 258.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.39, while NEN trades at $73.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas NEN's P/E ratio is 16.32. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to NEN's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is more volatile compared to NEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs FLJ Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, FLJ has a market cap of 258M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.39, while FLJ trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas FLJ's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to FLJ's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to FLJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs DOUG Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, DOUG has a market cap of 241.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.39, while DOUG trades at $2.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas DOUG's P/E ratio is -5.68. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to DOUG's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to DOUG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs CIAN Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, CIAN has a market cap of 237.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.39, while CIAN trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas CIAN's P/E ratio is -4.86. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CIAN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to CIAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs OPAD-WT Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, OPAD-WT has a market cap of 234.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.39, while OPAD-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas OPAD-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to OPAD-WT's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to OPAD-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs ASPS Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, ASPS has a market cap of 133.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.39, while ASPS trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas ASPS's P/E ratio is -1.49. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ASPS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to ASPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs LODE Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, LODE has a market cap of 120.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.39, while LODE trades at $3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas LODE's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LODE's ROE of -138743.50%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to LODE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs STHO Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, STHO has a market cap of 103.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.39, while STHO trades at $7.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas STHO's P/E ratio is -2.29. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to STHO's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to STHO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs DOMA Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, DOMA has a market cap of 89.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.39, while DOMA trades at $6.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas DOMA's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to DOMA's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to DOMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs MAYS Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, MAYS has a market cap of 77.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.39, while MAYS trades at $38.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas MAYS's P/E ratio is -1283.33. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MAYS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is more volatile compared to MAYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs RFL Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, RFL has a market cap of 73M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.39, while RFL trades at $2.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas RFL's P/E ratio is -2.31. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to RFL's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to RFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs OPAD Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, OPAD has a market cap of 53.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.39, while OPAD trades at $1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas OPAD's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to OPAD's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to OPAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs WE Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, WE has a market cap of 44.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.39, while WE trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas WE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to WE's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to WE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs FTHM Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, FTHM has a market cap of 39.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.39, while FTHM trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas FTHM's P/E ratio is -1.41. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to FTHM's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to FTHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs CHG Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, CHG has a market cap of 35.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.39, while CHG trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas CHG's P/E ratio is 43.33. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CHG's ROE of +3.50%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to CHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs OMH Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, OMH has a market cap of 31.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.39, while OMH trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas OMH's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to OMH's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to OMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs AIRE Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, AIRE has a market cap of 31.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.39, while AIRE trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas AIRE's P/E ratio is -2.26. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to AIRE's ROE of -2.42%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to AIRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs LGPS Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, LGPS has a market cap of 25.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.39, while LGPS trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas LGPS's P/E ratio is 4.61. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LGPS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to LGPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs GYRO Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, GYRO has a market cap of 19M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.39, while GYRO trades at $8.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas GYRO's P/E ratio is 45.49. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to GYRO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to GYRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs DUO Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, DUO has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.39, while DUO trades at $2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas DUO's P/E ratio is 0.28. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to DUO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to DUO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs LEJU Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, LEJU has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.39, while LEJU trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas LEJU's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LEJU's ROE of -2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to LEJU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs WETH Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, WETH has a market cap of 10.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.39, while WETH trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas WETH's P/E ratio is 3.26. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to WETH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to WETH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs LRHC Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, LRHC has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.39, while LRHC trades at $7.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas LRHC's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LRHC's ROE of +5.61%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to LRHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs AVCO Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, AVCO has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.39, while AVCO trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas AVCO's P/E ratio is -5.16. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to AVCO's ROE of -2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to AVCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs GBR Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, GBR has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.39, while GBR trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas GBR's P/E ratio is -32.53. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to GBR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to GBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs ALBT Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, ALBT has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.39, while ALBT trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas ALBT's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ALBT's ROE of -2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to ALBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs UOKA Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, UOKA has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.39, while UOKA trades at $2.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas UOKA's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to UOKA's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to UOKA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs MDJH Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, MDJH has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.39, while MDJH trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas MDJH's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MDJH's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is more volatile compared to MDJH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs UKOMW Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, UKOMW has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.39, while UKOMW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas UKOMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to UKOMW's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is more volatile compared to UKOMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs UK Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, UK has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.39, while UK trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas UK's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to UK's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to UK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs SFRWW Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, SFRWW has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.39, while SFRWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas SFRWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SFRWW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to SFRWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs SFR Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, SFR has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.39, while SFR trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas SFR's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SFR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to SFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs XHG Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, XHG has a market cap of 6K. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.39, while XHG trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas XHG's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to XHG's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to XHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs LMRKO Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, LMRKO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.39, while LMRKO trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas LMRKO's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LMRKO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is more volatile compared to LMRKO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs LMRKN Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, LMRKN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.39, while LMRKN trades at $25.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas LMRKN's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LMRKN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is more volatile compared to LMRKN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs NTP Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, NTP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.39, while NTP trades at $4.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas NTP's P/E ratio is 3.40. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to NTP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to NTP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs LMRK Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, LMRK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.39, while LMRK trades at $16.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas LMRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LMRK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is more volatile compared to LMRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs BPY Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, BPY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.39, while BPY trades at $18.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas BPY's P/E ratio is -11.28. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to BPY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to BPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs OBAS Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, OBAS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.39, while OBAS trades at $12.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas OBAS's P/E ratio is -31.48. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to OBAS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is more volatile compared to OBAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs IRCP Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, IRCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.39, while IRCP trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas IRCP's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to IRCP's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is less volatile compared to IRCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.
BPYPP vs LMRKP Comparison
BPYPP plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPP stands at 5.3B. In comparison, LMRKP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPP is priced at $14.39, while LMRKP trades at $25.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.55, whereas LMRKP's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, BPYPP's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LMRKP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPP is more volatile compared to LMRKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPP.