Brookfield Property Partners L.P.
Brookfield Property Partners L.P. BPYPO Peers
See (BPYPO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Real Estate - Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BPYPO | $15.11 | -0.40% | 5.6B | 6.93 | $2.20 | +10.55% |
| DUO | $2.25 | +8.70% | 62.1B | 0.29 | $7.68 | N/A |
| CBRE | $142.51 | +0.63% | 42.5B | 43.57 | $3.27 | N/A |
| CSGP | $81.42 | -0.60% | 34.4B | 290.79 | $0.28 | N/A |
| JLL | $259.00 | +0.83% | 12.3B | 23.41 | $11.06 | N/A |
| FSV | $176.15 | +0.26% | 8B | 60.79 | $2.90 | +0.59% |
| BEKE | $17.65 | -0.65% | 6.7B | 33.30 | $0.53 | +2.04% |
| CIGI | $130.51 | -0.41% | 6.4B | 45.26 | $2.88 | +0.23% |
| BPYPP | $15.15 | +0.93% | 5.6B | 6.99 | $2.20 | +10.55% |
| BPYPN | $13.44 | +0.60% | 5B | 6.19 | $2.20 | +10.55% |
Stock Comparison
BPYPO vs DUO Comparison
BPYPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPO stands at 5.6B. In comparison, DUO has a market cap of 62.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPO is priced at $15.11, while DUO trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas DUO's P/E ratio is 0.29. In terms of profitability, BPYPO's ROE is -0.13%, compared to DUO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPO is less volatile compared to DUO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPO.
BPYPO vs CBRE Comparison
BPYPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPO stands at 5.6B. In comparison, CBRE has a market cap of 42.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPO is priced at $15.11, while CBRE trades at $142.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas CBRE's P/E ratio is 43.57. In terms of profitability, BPYPO's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CBRE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPO is less volatile compared to CBRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPO.
BPYPO vs CSGP Comparison
BPYPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPO stands at 5.6B. In comparison, CSGP has a market cap of 34.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPO is priced at $15.11, while CSGP trades at $81.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas CSGP's P/E ratio is 290.79. In terms of profitability, BPYPO's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CSGP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPO is less volatile compared to CSGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPO.
BPYPO vs JLL Comparison
BPYPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPO stands at 5.6B. In comparison, JLL has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPO is priced at $15.11, while JLL trades at $259.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas JLL's P/E ratio is 23.41. In terms of profitability, BPYPO's ROE is -0.13%, compared to JLL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPO is less volatile compared to JLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPO.
BPYPO vs FSV Comparison
BPYPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPO stands at 5.6B. In comparison, FSV has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPO is priced at $15.11, while FSV trades at $176.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas FSV's P/E ratio is 60.79. In terms of profitability, BPYPO's ROE is -0.13%, compared to FSV's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPO is less volatile compared to FSV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPO.
BPYPO vs BEKE Comparison
BPYPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPO stands at 5.6B. In comparison, BEKE has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPO is priced at $15.11, while BEKE trades at $17.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas BEKE's P/E ratio is 33.30. In terms of profitability, BPYPO's ROE is -0.13%, compared to BEKE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPO is less volatile compared to BEKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPO.
BPYPO vs CIGI Comparison
BPYPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPO stands at 5.6B. In comparison, CIGI has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPO is priced at $15.11, while CIGI trades at $130.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas CIGI's P/E ratio is 45.26. In terms of profitability, BPYPO's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CIGI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPO is less volatile compared to CIGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPO.
BPYPO vs BPYPP Comparison
BPYPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPO stands at 5.6B. In comparison, BPYPP has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPO is priced at $15.11, while BPYPP trades at $15.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas BPYPP's P/E ratio is 6.99. In terms of profitability, BPYPO's ROE is -0.13%, compared to BPYPP's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPO is less volatile compared to BPYPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPO.
BPYPO vs BPYPN Comparison
BPYPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPO stands at 5.6B. In comparison, BPYPN has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPO is priced at $15.11, while BPYPN trades at $13.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas BPYPN's P/E ratio is 6.19. In terms of profitability, BPYPO's ROE is -0.13%, compared to BPYPN's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPO is less volatile compared to BPYPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPO.
BPYPO vs TCN Comparison
BPYPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPO stands at 5.6B. In comparison, TCN has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPO is priced at $15.11, while TCN trades at $11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas TCN's P/E ratio is 27.44. In terms of profitability, BPYPO's ROE is -0.13%, compared to TCN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPO is more volatile compared to TCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPO.
BPYPO vs CWK Comparison
BPYPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPO stands at 5.6B. In comparison, CWK has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPO is priced at $15.11, while CWK trades at $11.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas CWK's P/E ratio is 16.66. In terms of profitability, BPYPO's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CWK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPO is less volatile compared to CWK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPO.
BPYPO vs NMRK Comparison
BPYPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPO stands at 5.6B. In comparison, NMRK has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPO is priced at $15.11, while NMRK trades at $12.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas NMRK's P/E ratio is 32.86. In terms of profitability, BPYPO's ROE is -0.13%, compared to NMRK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPO is less volatile compared to NMRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPO.
BPYPO vs EXPI Comparison
BPYPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPO stands at 5.6B. In comparison, EXPI has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPO is priced at $15.11, while EXPI trades at $9.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas EXPI's P/E ratio is -105.83. In terms of profitability, BPYPO's ROE is -0.13%, compared to EXPI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPO is less volatile compared to EXPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPO.
BPYPO vs RDFN Comparison
BPYPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPO stands at 5.6B. In comparison, RDFN has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPO is priced at $15.11, while RDFN trades at $11.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas RDFN's P/E ratio is -7.36. In terms of profitability, BPYPO's ROE is -0.13%, compared to RDFN's ROE of +2.74%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPO is less volatile compared to RDFN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPO.
BPYPO vs RLGY Comparison
BPYPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPO stands at 5.6B. In comparison, RLGY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPO is priced at $15.11, while RLGY trades at $12.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas RLGY's P/E ratio is 4.59. In terms of profitability, BPYPO's ROE is -0.13%, compared to RLGY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPO is less volatile compared to RLGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPO.
BPYPO vs MMI Comparison
BPYPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPO stands at 5.6B. In comparison, MMI has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPO is priced at $15.11, while MMI trades at $32.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas MMI's P/E ratio is -189.50. In terms of profitability, BPYPO's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MMI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPO is less volatile compared to MMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPO.
BPYPO vs PGRU Comparison
BPYPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPO stands at 5.6B. In comparison, PGRU has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPO is priced at $15.11, while PGRU trades at $6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas PGRU's P/E ratio is -67.00. In terms of profitability, BPYPO's ROE is -0.13%, compared to PGRU's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPO is more volatile compared to PGRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPO.
BPYPO vs KW Comparison
BPYPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPO stands at 5.6B. In comparison, KW has a market cap of 999.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPO is priced at $15.11, while KW trades at $7.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas KW's P/E ratio is -6.88. In terms of profitability, BPYPO's ROE is -0.13%, compared to KW's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPO is less volatile compared to KW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPO.
BPYPO vs REAX Comparison
BPYPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPO stands at 5.6B. In comparison, REAX has a market cap of 879.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPO is priced at $15.11, while REAX trades at $4.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas REAX's P/E ratio is -60.93. In terms of profitability, BPYPO's ROE is -0.13%, compared to REAX's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPO is less volatile compared to REAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPO.
BPYPO vs INDT Comparison
BPYPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPO stands at 5.6B. In comparison, INDT has a market cap of 683.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPO is priced at $15.11, while INDT trades at $66.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas INDT's P/E ratio is -209.34. In terms of profitability, BPYPO's ROE is -0.13%, compared to INDT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPO is more volatile compared to INDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPO.
BPYPO vs QK Comparison
BPYPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPO stands at 5.6B. In comparison, QK has a market cap of 636.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPO is priced at $15.11, while QK trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas QK's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, BPYPO's ROE is -0.13%, compared to QK's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPO is less volatile compared to QK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPO.
BPYPO vs RMR Comparison
BPYPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPO stands at 5.6B. In comparison, RMR has a market cap of 549.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPO is priced at $15.11, while RMR trades at $17.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas RMR's P/E ratio is 14.36. In terms of profitability, BPYPO's ROE is -0.13%, compared to RMR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPO is less volatile compared to RMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPO.
BPYPO vs FRPH Comparison
BPYPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPO stands at 5.6B. In comparison, FRPH has a market cap of 515.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPO is priced at $15.11, while FRPH trades at $26.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas FRPH's P/E ratio is 75.06. In terms of profitability, BPYPO's ROE is -0.13%, compared to FRPH's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPO is less volatile compared to FRPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPO.
BPYPO vs HOUS Comparison
BPYPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPO stands at 5.6B. In comparison, HOUS has a market cap of 418.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPO is priced at $15.11, while HOUS trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas HOUS's P/E ratio is -3.98. In terms of profitability, BPYPO's ROE is -0.13%, compared to HOUS's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPO is less volatile compared to HOUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPO.
BPYPO vs OPEN Comparison
BPYPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPO stands at 5.6B. In comparison, OPEN has a market cap of 412.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPO is priced at $15.11, while OPEN trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas OPEN's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, BPYPO's ROE is -0.13%, compared to OPEN's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPO is less volatile compared to OPEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPO.
BPYPO vs TCI Comparison
BPYPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPO stands at 5.6B. In comparison, TCI has a market cap of 391M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPO is priced at $15.11, while TCI trades at $44.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas TCI's P/E ratio is 49.73. In terms of profitability, BPYPO's ROE is -0.13%, compared to TCI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPO is less volatile compared to TCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPO.
BPYPO vs MLP Comparison
BPYPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPO stands at 5.6B. In comparison, MLP has a market cap of 352.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPO is priced at $15.11, while MLP trades at $17.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas MLP's P/E ratio is -23.78. In terms of profitability, BPYPO's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MLP's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPO is less volatile compared to MLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPO.
BPYPO vs RMAX Comparison
BPYPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPO stands at 5.6B. In comparison, RMAX has a market cap of 326.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPO is priced at $15.11, while RMAX trades at $8.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas RMAX's P/E ratio is 18.20. In terms of profitability, BPYPO's ROE is -0.13%, compared to RMAX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPO is less volatile compared to RMAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPO.
BPYPO vs FLJ Comparison
BPYPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPO stands at 5.6B. In comparison, FLJ has a market cap of 258M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPO is priced at $15.11, while FLJ trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas FLJ's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, BPYPO's ROE is -0.13%, compared to FLJ's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPO is less volatile compared to FLJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPO.
BPYPO vs NEN Comparison
BPYPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPO stands at 5.6B. In comparison, NEN has a market cap of 256.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPO is priced at $15.11, while NEN trades at $73.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas NEN's P/E ratio is 16.24. In terms of profitability, BPYPO's ROE is -0.13%, compared to NEN's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPO is more volatile compared to NEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPO.
BPYPO vs SEG Comparison
BPYPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPO stands at 5.6B. In comparison, SEG has a market cap of 243.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPO is priced at $15.11, while SEG trades at $19.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas SEG's P/E ratio is -1.73. In terms of profitability, BPYPO's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SEG's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPO is less volatile compared to SEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPO.
BPYPO vs CIAN Comparison
BPYPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPO stands at 5.6B. In comparison, CIAN has a market cap of 237.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPO is priced at $15.11, while CIAN trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas CIAN's P/E ratio is -4.86. In terms of profitability, BPYPO's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CIAN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPO is less volatile compared to CIAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPO.
BPYPO vs OPAD-WT Comparison
BPYPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPO stands at 5.6B. In comparison, OPAD-WT has a market cap of 234.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPO is priced at $15.11, while OPAD-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas OPAD-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BPYPO's ROE is -0.13%, compared to OPAD-WT's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPO is less volatile compared to OPAD-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPO.
BPYPO vs DOUG Comparison
BPYPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPO stands at 5.6B. In comparison, DOUG has a market cap of 205.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPO is priced at $15.11, while DOUG trades at $2.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas DOUG's P/E ratio is -4.83. In terms of profitability, BPYPO's ROE is -0.13%, compared to DOUG's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPO is less volatile compared to DOUG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPO.
BPYPO vs LODE Comparison
BPYPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPO stands at 5.6B. In comparison, LODE has a market cap of 122.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPO is priced at $15.11, while LODE trades at $3.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas LODE's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, BPYPO's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LODE's ROE of -138743.50%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPO is less volatile compared to LODE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPO.
BPYPO vs ASPS Comparison
BPYPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPO stands at 5.6B. In comparison, ASPS has a market cap of 107.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPO is priced at $15.11, while ASPS trades at $9.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas ASPS's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, BPYPO's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ASPS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPO is less volatile compared to ASPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPO.
BPYPO vs STHO Comparison
BPYPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPO stands at 5.6B. In comparison, STHO has a market cap of 104.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPO is priced at $15.11, while STHO trades at $7.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas STHO's P/E ratio is -2.31. In terms of profitability, BPYPO's ROE is -0.13%, compared to STHO's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPO is less volatile compared to STHO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPO.
BPYPO vs RFL Comparison
BPYPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPO stands at 5.6B. In comparison, RFL has a market cap of 95.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPO is priced at $15.11, while RFL trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas RFL's P/E ratio is -2.07. In terms of profitability, BPYPO's ROE is -0.13%, compared to RFL's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPO is less volatile compared to RFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPO.
BPYPO vs DOMA Comparison
BPYPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPO stands at 5.6B. In comparison, DOMA has a market cap of 89.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPO is priced at $15.11, while DOMA trades at $6.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas DOMA's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, BPYPO's ROE is -0.13%, compared to DOMA's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPO is less volatile compared to DOMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPO.
BPYPO vs MAYS Comparison
BPYPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPO stands at 5.6B. In comparison, MAYS has a market cap of 80.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPO is priced at $15.11, while MAYS trades at $37.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas MAYS's P/E ratio is -1333.33. In terms of profitability, BPYPO's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MAYS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPO is more volatile compared to MAYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPO.
BPYPO vs WE Comparison
BPYPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPO stands at 5.6B. In comparison, WE has a market cap of 44.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPO is priced at $15.11, while WE trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas WE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BPYPO's ROE is -0.13%, compared to WE's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPO is less volatile compared to WE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPO.
BPYPO vs FTHM Comparison
BPYPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPO stands at 5.6B. In comparison, FTHM has a market cap of 40.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPO is priced at $15.11, while FTHM trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas FTHM's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, BPYPO's ROE is -0.13%, compared to FTHM's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPO is less volatile compared to FTHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPO.
BPYPO vs CHG Comparison
BPYPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPO stands at 5.6B. In comparison, CHG has a market cap of 35.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPO is priced at $15.11, while CHG trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas CHG's P/E ratio is 43.33. In terms of profitability, BPYPO's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CHG's ROE of +3.50%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPO is less volatile compared to CHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPO.
BPYPO vs OPAD Comparison
BPYPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPO stands at 5.6B. In comparison, OPAD has a market cap of 31.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPO is priced at $15.11, while OPAD trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas OPAD's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, BPYPO's ROE is -0.13%, compared to OPAD's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPO is less volatile compared to OPAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPO.
BPYPO vs OMH Comparison
BPYPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPO stands at 5.6B. In comparison, OMH has a market cap of 31.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPO is priced at $15.11, while OMH trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas OMH's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, BPYPO's ROE is -0.13%, compared to OMH's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPO is less volatile compared to OMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPO.
BPYPO vs LGPS Comparison
BPYPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPO stands at 5.6B. In comparison, LGPS has a market cap of 20.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPO is priced at $15.11, while LGPS trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas LGPS's P/E ratio is 4.47. In terms of profitability, BPYPO's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LGPS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPO is less volatile compared to LGPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPO.
BPYPO vs GYRO Comparison
BPYPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPO stands at 5.6B. In comparison, GYRO has a market cap of 18.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPO is priced at $15.11, while GYRO trades at $8.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas GYRO's P/E ratio is 47.33. In terms of profitability, BPYPO's ROE is -0.13%, compared to GYRO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPO is more volatile compared to GYRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPO.
BPYPO vs AIRE Comparison
BPYPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPO stands at 5.6B. In comparison, AIRE has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPO is priced at $15.11, while AIRE trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas AIRE's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, BPYPO's ROE is -0.13%, compared to AIRE's ROE of -2.42%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPO is less volatile compared to AIRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPO.
BPYPO vs LEJU Comparison
BPYPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPO stands at 5.6B. In comparison, LEJU has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPO is priced at $15.11, while LEJU trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas LEJU's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, BPYPO's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LEJU's ROE of -2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPO is less volatile compared to LEJU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPO.
BPYPO vs WETH Comparison
BPYPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPO stands at 5.6B. In comparison, WETH has a market cap of 11.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPO is priced at $15.11, while WETH trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas WETH's P/E ratio is 3.56. In terms of profitability, BPYPO's ROE is -0.13%, compared to WETH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPO is less volatile compared to WETH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPO.
BPYPO vs GBR Comparison
BPYPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPO stands at 5.6B. In comparison, GBR has a market cap of 5.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPO is priced at $15.11, while GBR trades at $1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas GBR's P/E ratio is -38.41. In terms of profitability, BPYPO's ROE is -0.13%, compared to GBR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPO is less volatile compared to GBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPO.
BPYPO vs ALBT Comparison
BPYPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPO stands at 5.6B. In comparison, ALBT has a market cap of 5.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPO is priced at $15.11, while ALBT trades at $2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas ALBT's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, BPYPO's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ALBT's ROE of -2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPO is less volatile compared to ALBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPO.
BPYPO vs AVCO Comparison
BPYPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPO stands at 5.6B. In comparison, AVCO has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPO is priced at $15.11, while AVCO trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas AVCO's P/E ratio is -5.16. In terms of profitability, BPYPO's ROE is -0.13%, compared to AVCO's ROE of -2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPO is less volatile compared to AVCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPO.
BPYPO vs LRHC Comparison
BPYPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPO stands at 5.6B. In comparison, LRHC has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPO is priced at $15.11, while LRHC trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas LRHC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BPYPO's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LRHC's ROE of -3.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPO is less volatile compared to LRHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPO.
BPYPO vs UOKA Comparison
BPYPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPO stands at 5.6B. In comparison, UOKA has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPO is priced at $15.11, while UOKA trades at $2.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas UOKA's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, BPYPO's ROE is -0.13%, compared to UOKA's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPO is less volatile compared to UOKA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPO.
BPYPO vs MDJH Comparison
BPYPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPO stands at 5.6B. In comparison, MDJH has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPO is priced at $15.11, while MDJH trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas MDJH's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, BPYPO's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MDJH's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPO is more volatile compared to MDJH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPO.
BPYPO vs UK Comparison
BPYPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPO stands at 5.6B. In comparison, UK has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPO is priced at $15.11, while UK trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas UK's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, BPYPO's ROE is -0.13%, compared to UK's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPO is less volatile compared to UK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPO.
BPYPO vs UKOMW Comparison
BPYPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPO stands at 5.6B. In comparison, UKOMW has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPO is priced at $15.11, while UKOMW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas UKOMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BPYPO's ROE is -0.13%, compared to UKOMW's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPO is less volatile compared to UKOMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPO.
BPYPO vs SFRWW Comparison
BPYPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPO stands at 5.6B. In comparison, SFRWW has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPO is priced at $15.11, while SFRWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas SFRWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BPYPO's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SFRWW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPO is less volatile compared to SFRWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPO.
BPYPO vs SFR Comparison
BPYPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPO stands at 5.6B. In comparison, SFR has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPO is priced at $15.11, while SFR trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas SFR's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, BPYPO's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SFR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPO is less volatile compared to SFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPO.
BPYPO vs XHG Comparison
BPYPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPO stands at 5.6B. In comparison, XHG has a market cap of 5.6K. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPO is priced at $15.11, while XHG trades at $1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas XHG's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, BPYPO's ROE is -0.13%, compared to XHG's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPO is less volatile compared to XHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPO.
BPYPO vs LMRKP Comparison
BPYPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPO stands at 5.6B. In comparison, LMRKP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPO is priced at $15.11, while LMRKP trades at $25.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas LMRKP's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, BPYPO's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LMRKP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPO is less volatile compared to LMRKP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPO.
BPYPO vs LMRKN Comparison
BPYPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPO stands at 5.6B. In comparison, LMRKN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPO is priced at $15.11, while LMRKN trades at $25.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas LMRKN's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, BPYPO's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LMRKN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPO is more volatile compared to LMRKN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPO.
BPYPO vs IRCP Comparison
BPYPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPO stands at 5.6B. In comparison, IRCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPO is priced at $15.11, while IRCP trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas IRCP's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, BPYPO's ROE is -0.13%, compared to IRCP's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPO is less volatile compared to IRCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPO.
BPYPO vs NTP Comparison
BPYPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPO stands at 5.6B. In comparison, NTP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPO is priced at $15.11, while NTP trades at $4.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas NTP's P/E ratio is 3.40. In terms of profitability, BPYPO's ROE is -0.13%, compared to NTP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPO is less volatile compared to NTP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPO.
BPYPO vs LMRKO Comparison
BPYPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPO stands at 5.6B. In comparison, LMRKO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPO is priced at $15.11, while LMRKO trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas LMRKO's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, BPYPO's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LMRKO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPO is more volatile compared to LMRKO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPO.
BPYPO vs OBAS Comparison
BPYPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPO stands at 5.6B. In comparison, OBAS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPO is priced at $15.11, while OBAS trades at $12.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas OBAS's P/E ratio is -31.48. In terms of profitability, BPYPO's ROE is -0.13%, compared to OBAS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPO is more volatile compared to OBAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPO.
BPYPO vs LMRK Comparison
BPYPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPO stands at 5.6B. In comparison, LMRK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPO is priced at $15.11, while LMRK trades at $16.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas LMRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BPYPO's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LMRK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPO is more volatile compared to LMRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPO.
BPYPO vs BPY Comparison
BPYPO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPO stands at 5.6B. In comparison, BPY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPO is priced at $15.11, while BPY trades at $18.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas BPY's P/E ratio is -11.28. In terms of profitability, BPYPO's ROE is -0.13%, compared to BPY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPO is less volatile compared to BPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPO.