Brookfield Property Partners L.P.
Brookfield Property Partners L.P. (BPYPN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BPYPN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Real Estate - Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BPYPN | $13.30 | +0.30% | 4.9B | 6.03 | $2.20 | +10.90% |
| CBRE | $158.54 | -0.70% | 47.1B | 44.51 | $3.56 | N/A |
| CSGP | $87.97 | +0.47% | 37.3B | 338.35 | $0.26 | N/A |
| JLL | $293.63 | -1.11% | 13.9B | 25.23 | $11.64 | N/A |
| FSV | $199.65 | -0.09% | 9.1B | 63.99 | $3.12 | +0.53% |
| CIGI | $162.13 | +0.35% | 8B | 72.70 | $2.23 | +0.19% |
| BEKE | $18.39 | +0.05% | 7B | 34.70 | $0.53 | +1.94% |
| BPYPP | $14.97 | +1.77% | 5.5B | 6.83 | $2.20 | +10.90% |
| BPYPO | $14.72 | +0.68% | 5.4B | 6.70 | $2.20 | +10.90% |
| CWK | $14.91 | -0.47% | 3.5B | 16.94 | $0.88 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
BPYPN vs CBRE Comparison August 2025
BPYPN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPN stands at 4.9B. In comparison, CBRE has a market cap of 47.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPN is priced at $13.30, while CBRE trades at $158.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.03, whereas CBRE's P/E ratio is 44.51. In terms of profitability, BPYPN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CBRE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPN is less volatile compared to CBRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPN.Check CBRE's competition here
BPYPN vs CSGP Comparison August 2025
BPYPN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPN stands at 4.9B. In comparison, CSGP has a market cap of 37.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPN is priced at $13.30, while CSGP trades at $87.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.03, whereas CSGP's P/E ratio is 338.35. In terms of profitability, BPYPN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CSGP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPN is less volatile compared to CSGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPN.Check CSGP's competition here
BPYPN vs JLL Comparison August 2025
BPYPN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPN stands at 4.9B. In comparison, JLL has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPN is priced at $13.30, while JLL trades at $293.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.03, whereas JLL's P/E ratio is 25.23. In terms of profitability, BPYPN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to JLL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPN is less volatile compared to JLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPN.Check JLL's competition here
BPYPN vs FSV Comparison August 2025
BPYPN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPN stands at 4.9B. In comparison, FSV has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPN is priced at $13.30, while FSV trades at $199.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.03, whereas FSV's P/E ratio is 63.99. In terms of profitability, BPYPN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to FSV's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPN is less volatile compared to FSV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPN.Check FSV's competition here
BPYPN vs CIGI Comparison August 2025
BPYPN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPN stands at 4.9B. In comparison, CIGI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPN is priced at $13.30, while CIGI trades at $162.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.03, whereas CIGI's P/E ratio is 72.70. In terms of profitability, BPYPN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CIGI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPN is less volatile compared to CIGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPN.Check CIGI's competition here
BPYPN vs BEKE Comparison August 2025
BPYPN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPN stands at 4.9B. In comparison, BEKE has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPN is priced at $13.30, while BEKE trades at $18.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.03, whereas BEKE's P/E ratio is 34.70. In terms of profitability, BPYPN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to BEKE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPN is less volatile compared to BEKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPN.Check BEKE's competition here
BPYPN vs BPYPP Comparison August 2025
BPYPN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPN stands at 4.9B. In comparison, BPYPP has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPN is priced at $13.30, while BPYPP trades at $14.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.03, whereas BPYPP's P/E ratio is 6.83. In terms of profitability, BPYPN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to BPYPP's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPN is less volatile compared to BPYPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPN.Check BPYPP's competition here
BPYPN vs BPYPO Comparison August 2025
BPYPN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPN stands at 4.9B. In comparison, BPYPO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPN is priced at $13.30, while BPYPO trades at $14.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.03, whereas BPYPO's P/E ratio is 6.70. In terms of profitability, BPYPN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to BPYPO's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPN is less volatile compared to BPYPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPN.Check BPYPO's competition here
BPYPN vs CWK Comparison August 2025
BPYPN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPN stands at 4.9B. In comparison, CWK has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPN is priced at $13.30, while CWK trades at $14.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.03, whereas CWK's P/E ratio is 16.94. In terms of profitability, BPYPN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CWK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPN is less volatile compared to CWK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPN.Check CWK's competition here
BPYPN vs NMRK Comparison August 2025
BPYPN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPN stands at 4.9B. In comparison, NMRK has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPN is priced at $13.30, while NMRK trades at $17.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.03, whereas NMRK's P/E ratio is 42.37. In terms of profitability, BPYPN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to NMRK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPN is less volatile compared to NMRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPN.Check NMRK's competition here
BPYPN vs TCN Comparison August 2025
BPYPN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPN stands at 4.9B. In comparison, TCN has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPN is priced at $13.30, while TCN trades at $11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.03, whereas TCN's P/E ratio is 27.44. In terms of profitability, BPYPN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to TCN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPN is more volatile compared to TCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPN.Check TCN's competition here
BPYPN vs OPEN Comparison August 2025
BPYPN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPN stands at 4.9B. In comparison, OPEN has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPN is priced at $13.30, while OPEN trades at $3.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.03, whereas OPEN's P/E ratio is -7.07. In terms of profitability, BPYPN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to OPEN's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPN is less volatile compared to OPEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPN.Check OPEN's competition here
BPYPN vs EXPI Comparison August 2025
BPYPN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPN stands at 4.9B. In comparison, EXPI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPN is priced at $13.30, while EXPI trades at $10.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.03, whereas EXPI's P/E ratio is -54.84. In terms of profitability, BPYPN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to EXPI's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPN is less volatile compared to EXPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPN.Check EXPI's competition here
BPYPN vs RDFN Comparison August 2025
BPYPN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPN stands at 4.9B. In comparison, RDFN has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPN is priced at $13.30, while RDFN trades at $11.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.03, whereas RDFN's P/E ratio is -7.36. In terms of profitability, BPYPN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to RDFN's ROE of +2.74%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPN is more volatile compared to RDFN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPN.Check RDFN's competition here
BPYPN vs RLGY Comparison August 2025
BPYPN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPN stands at 4.9B. In comparison, RLGY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPN is priced at $13.30, while RLGY trades at $12.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.03, whereas RLGY's P/E ratio is 4.59. In terms of profitability, BPYPN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to RLGY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPN is less volatile compared to RLGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPN.Check RLGY's competition here
BPYPN vs MMI Comparison August 2025
BPYPN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPN stands at 4.9B. In comparison, MMI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPN is priced at $13.30, while MMI trades at $30.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.03, whereas MMI's P/E ratio is -96.62. In terms of profitability, BPYPN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MMI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPN is less volatile compared to MMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPN.Check MMI's competition here
BPYPN vs KW Comparison August 2025
BPYPN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPN stands at 4.9B. In comparison, KW has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPN is priced at $13.30, while KW trades at $8.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.03, whereas KW's P/E ratio is -12.26. In terms of profitability, BPYPN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to KW's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPN is less volatile compared to KW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPN.Check KW's competition here
BPYPN vs PGRU Comparison August 2025
BPYPN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPN stands at 4.9B. In comparison, PGRU has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPN is priced at $13.30, while PGRU trades at $6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.03, whereas PGRU's P/E ratio is -67.00. In terms of profitability, BPYPN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to PGRU's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPN is more volatile compared to PGRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPN.Check PGRU's competition here
BPYPN vs REAX Comparison August 2025
BPYPN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPN stands at 4.9B. In comparison, REAX has a market cap of 921.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPN is priced at $13.30, while REAX trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.03, whereas REAX's P/E ratio is -63.86. In terms of profitability, BPYPN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to REAX's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPN is less volatile compared to REAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPN.Check REAX's competition here
BPYPN vs INDT Comparison August 2025
BPYPN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPN stands at 4.9B. In comparison, INDT has a market cap of 683.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPN is priced at $13.30, while INDT trades at $66.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.03, whereas INDT's P/E ratio is -209.34. In terms of profitability, BPYPN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to INDT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPN is more volatile compared to INDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPN.Check INDT's competition here
BPYPN vs QK Comparison August 2025
BPYPN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPN stands at 4.9B. In comparison, QK has a market cap of 636.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPN is priced at $13.30, while QK trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.03, whereas QK's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, BPYPN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to QK's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPN is less volatile compared to QK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPN.Check QK's competition here
BPYPN vs HOUS Comparison August 2025
BPYPN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPN stands at 4.9B. In comparison, HOUS has a market cap of 634.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPN is priced at $13.30, while HOUS trades at $5.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.03, whereas HOUS's P/E ratio is -5.84. In terms of profitability, BPYPN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to HOUS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPN is less volatile compared to HOUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPN.Check HOUS's competition here
BPYPN vs RMR Comparison August 2025
BPYPN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPN stands at 4.9B. In comparison, RMR has a market cap of 528.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPN is priced at $13.30, while RMR trades at $16.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.03, whereas RMR's P/E ratio is 14.54. In terms of profitability, BPYPN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to RMR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPN is less volatile compared to RMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPN.Check RMR's competition here
BPYPN vs FRPH Comparison August 2025
BPYPN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPN stands at 4.9B. In comparison, FRPH has a market cap of 497M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPN is priced at $13.30, while FRPH trades at $26.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.03, whereas FRPH's P/E ratio is 92.89. In terms of profitability, BPYPN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to FRPH's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPN is less volatile compared to FRPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPN.Check FRPH's competition here
BPYPN vs TCI Comparison August 2025
BPYPN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPN stands at 4.9B. In comparison, TCI has a market cap of 394.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPN is priced at $13.30, while TCI trades at $45.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.03, whereas TCI's P/E ratio is 60.14. In terms of profitability, BPYPN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to TCI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPN is more volatile compared to TCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPN.Check TCI's competition here
BPYPN vs MLP Comparison August 2025
BPYPN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPN stands at 4.9B. In comparison, MLP has a market cap of 345.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPN is priced at $13.30, while MLP trades at $17.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.03, whereas MLP's P/E ratio is -23.31. In terms of profitability, BPYPN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MLP's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPN is less volatile compared to MLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPN.Check MLP's competition here
BPYPN vs SEG Comparison August 2025
BPYPN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPN stands at 4.9B. In comparison, SEG has a market cap of 329.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPN is priced at $13.30, while SEG trades at $25.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.03, whereas SEG's P/E ratio is -2.72. In terms of profitability, BPYPN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SEG's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPN is less volatile compared to SEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPN.Check SEG's competition here
BPYPN vs FLJ Comparison August 2025
BPYPN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPN stands at 4.9B. In comparison, FLJ has a market cap of 258M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPN is priced at $13.30, while FLJ trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.03, whereas FLJ's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, BPYPN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to FLJ's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPN is less volatile compared to FLJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPN.Check FLJ's competition here
BPYPN vs NEN Comparison August 2025
BPYPN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPN stands at 4.9B. In comparison, NEN has a market cap of 248.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPN is priced at $13.30, while NEN trades at $71.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.03, whereas NEN's P/E ratio is 15.64. In terms of profitability, BPYPN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to NEN's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPN is more volatile compared to NEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPN.Check NEN's competition here
BPYPN vs CIAN Comparison August 2025
BPYPN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPN stands at 4.9B. In comparison, CIAN has a market cap of 237.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPN is priced at $13.30, while CIAN trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.03, whereas CIAN's P/E ratio is -4.86. In terms of profitability, BPYPN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CIAN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPN is less volatile compared to CIAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPN.Check CIAN's competition here
BPYPN vs OPAD-WT Comparison August 2025
BPYPN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPN stands at 4.9B. In comparison, OPAD-WT has a market cap of 234.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPN is priced at $13.30, while OPAD-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.03, whereas OPAD-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BPYPN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to OPAD-WT's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPN is less volatile compared to OPAD-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPN.Check OPAD-WT's competition here
BPYPN vs DOUG Comparison August 2025
BPYPN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPN stands at 4.9B. In comparison, DOUG has a market cap of 212M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPN is priced at $13.30, while DOUG trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.03, whereas DOUG's P/E ratio is -3.27. In terms of profitability, BPYPN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to DOUG's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPN is less volatile compared to DOUG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPN.Check DOUG's competition here
BPYPN vs RMAX Comparison August 2025
BPYPN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPN stands at 4.9B. In comparison, RMAX has a market cap of 175.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPN is priced at $13.30, while RMAX trades at $8.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.03, whereas RMAX's P/E ratio is 17.91. In terms of profitability, BPYPN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to RMAX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPN is less volatile compared to RMAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPN.Check RMAX's competition here
BPYPN vs STHO Comparison August 2025
BPYPN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPN stands at 4.9B. In comparison, STHO has a market cap of 107.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPN is priced at $13.30, while STHO trades at $8.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.03, whereas STHO's P/E ratio is -1.87. In terms of profitability, BPYPN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to STHO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPN is less volatile compared to STHO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPN.Check STHO's competition here
BPYPN vs ASPS Comparison August 2025
BPYPN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPN stands at 4.9B. In comparison, ASPS has a market cap of 105.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPN is priced at $13.30, while ASPS trades at $9.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.03, whereas ASPS's P/E ratio is -2.49. In terms of profitability, BPYPN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ASPS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPN is less volatile compared to ASPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPN.Check ASPS's competition here
BPYPN vs DOMA Comparison August 2025
BPYPN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPN stands at 4.9B. In comparison, DOMA has a market cap of 89.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPN is priced at $13.30, while DOMA trades at $6.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.03, whereas DOMA's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, BPYPN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to DOMA's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPN is less volatile compared to DOMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPN.Check DOMA's competition here
BPYPN vs LODE Comparison August 2025
BPYPN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPN stands at 4.9B. In comparison, LODE has a market cap of 81.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPN is priced at $13.30, while LODE trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.03, whereas LODE's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, BPYPN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LODE's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPN is less volatile compared to LODE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPN.Check LODE's competition here
BPYPN vs MAYS Comparison August 2025
BPYPN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPN stands at 4.9B. In comparison, MAYS has a market cap of 75.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPN is priced at $13.30, while MAYS trades at $37.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.03, whereas MAYS's P/E ratio is -1250.00. In terms of profitability, BPYPN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MAYS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPN is less volatile compared to MAYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPN.Check MAYS's competition here
BPYPN vs RFL Comparison August 2025
BPYPN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPN stands at 4.9B. In comparison, RFL has a market cap of 55.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPN is priced at $13.30, while RFL trades at $1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.03, whereas RFL's P/E ratio is -1.77. In terms of profitability, BPYPN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to RFL's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPN is less volatile compared to RFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPN.Check RFL's competition here
BPYPN vs OPAD Comparison August 2025
BPYPN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPN stands at 4.9B. In comparison, OPAD has a market cap of 46.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPN is priced at $13.30, while OPAD trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.03, whereas OPAD's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, BPYPN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to OPAD's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPN is less volatile compared to OPAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPN.Check OPAD's competition here
BPYPN vs WE Comparison August 2025
BPYPN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPN stands at 4.9B. In comparison, WE has a market cap of 44.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPN is priced at $13.30, while WE trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.03, whereas WE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BPYPN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to WE's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPN is less volatile compared to WE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPN.Check WE's competition here
BPYPN vs CHG Comparison August 2025
BPYPN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPN stands at 4.9B. In comparison, CHG has a market cap of 35.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPN is priced at $13.30, while CHG trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.03, whereas CHG's P/E ratio is 43.33. In terms of profitability, BPYPN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CHG's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPN is less volatile compared to CHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPN.Check CHG's competition here
BPYPN vs FTHM Comparison August 2025
BPYPN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPN stands at 4.9B. In comparison, FTHM has a market cap of 32.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPN is priced at $13.30, while FTHM trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.03, whereas FTHM's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, BPYPN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to FTHM's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPN is less volatile compared to FTHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPN.Check FTHM's competition here
BPYPN vs AIRE Comparison August 2025
BPYPN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPN stands at 4.9B. In comparison, AIRE has a market cap of 30.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPN is priced at $13.30, while AIRE trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.03, whereas AIRE's P/E ratio is -1.82. In terms of profitability, BPYPN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to AIRE's ROE of -2.42%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPN is less volatile compared to AIRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPN.Check AIRE's competition here
BPYPN vs OMH Comparison August 2025
BPYPN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPN stands at 4.9B. In comparison, OMH has a market cap of 26.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPN is priced at $13.30, while OMH trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.03, whereas OMH's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, BPYPN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to OMH's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPN is less volatile compared to OMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPN.Check OMH's competition here
BPYPN vs LGPS Comparison August 2025
BPYPN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPN stands at 4.9B. In comparison, LGPS has a market cap of 24.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPN is priced at $13.30, while LGPS trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.03, whereas LGPS's P/E ratio is 4.25. In terms of profitability, BPYPN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LGPS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPN is less volatile compared to LGPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPN.Check LGPS's competition here
BPYPN vs GYRO Comparison August 2025
BPYPN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPN stands at 4.9B. In comparison, GYRO has a market cap of 22.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPN is priced at $13.30, while GYRO trades at $10.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.03, whereas GYRO's P/E ratio is 47.11. In terms of profitability, BPYPN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to GYRO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPN is less volatile compared to GYRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPN.Check GYRO's competition here
BPYPN vs LEJU Comparison August 2025
BPYPN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPN stands at 4.9B. In comparison, LEJU has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPN is priced at $13.30, while LEJU trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.03, whereas LEJU's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, BPYPN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LEJU's ROE of -2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPN is less volatile compared to LEJU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPN.Check LEJU's competition here
BPYPN vs DUO Comparison August 2025
BPYPN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPN stands at 4.9B. In comparison, DUO has a market cap of 11.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPN is priced at $13.30, while DUO trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.03, whereas DUO's P/E ratio is 0.21. In terms of profitability, BPYPN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to DUO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPN is less volatile compared to DUO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPN.Check DUO's competition here
BPYPN vs WETH Comparison August 2025
BPYPN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPN stands at 4.9B. In comparison, WETH has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPN is priced at $13.30, while WETH trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.03, whereas WETH's P/E ratio is 3.23. In terms of profitability, BPYPN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to WETH's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPN is less volatile compared to WETH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPN.Check WETH's competition here
BPYPN vs ALBT Comparison August 2025
BPYPN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPN stands at 4.9B. In comparison, ALBT has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPN is priced at $13.30, while ALBT trades at $2.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.03, whereas ALBT's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, BPYPN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ALBT's ROE of -2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPN is less volatile compared to ALBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPN.Check ALBT's competition here
BPYPN vs LRHC Comparison August 2025
BPYPN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPN stands at 4.9B. In comparison, LRHC has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPN is priced at $13.30, while LRHC trades at $5.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.03, whereas LRHC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BPYPN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LRHC's ROE of +5.61%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPN is less volatile compared to LRHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPN.Check LRHC's competition here
BPYPN vs AVCO Comparison August 2025
BPYPN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPN stands at 4.9B. In comparison, AVCO has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPN is priced at $13.30, while AVCO trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.03, whereas AVCO's P/E ratio is -5.16. In terms of profitability, BPYPN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to AVCO's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPN is less volatile compared to AVCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPN.Check AVCO's competition here
BPYPN vs GBR Comparison August 2025
BPYPN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPN stands at 4.9B. In comparison, GBR has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPN is priced at $13.30, while GBR trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.03, whereas GBR's P/E ratio is -27.75. In terms of profitability, BPYPN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to GBR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPN is less volatile compared to GBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPN.Check GBR's competition here
BPYPN vs UOKA Comparison August 2025
BPYPN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPN stands at 4.9B. In comparison, UOKA has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPN is priced at $13.30, while UOKA trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.03, whereas UOKA's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, BPYPN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to UOKA's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPN is less volatile compared to UOKA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPN.Check UOKA's competition here
BPYPN vs MDJH Comparison August 2025
BPYPN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPN stands at 4.9B. In comparison, MDJH has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPN is priced at $13.30, while MDJH trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.03, whereas MDJH's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, BPYPN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MDJH's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPN is more volatile compared to MDJH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPN.Check MDJH's competition here
BPYPN vs UK Comparison August 2025
BPYPN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPN stands at 4.9B. In comparison, UK has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPN is priced at $13.30, while UK trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.03, whereas UK's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, BPYPN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to UK's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPN is less volatile compared to UK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPN.Check UK's competition here
BPYPN vs SFRWW Comparison August 2025
BPYPN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPN stands at 4.9B. In comparison, SFRWW has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPN is priced at $13.30, while SFRWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.03, whereas SFRWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BPYPN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SFRWW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPN is less volatile compared to SFRWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPN.Check SFRWW's competition here
BPYPN vs SFR Comparison August 2025
BPYPN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPN stands at 4.9B. In comparison, SFR has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPN is priced at $13.30, while SFR trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.03, whereas SFR's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, BPYPN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SFR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPN is less volatile compared to SFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPN.Check SFR's competition here
BPYPN vs UKOMW Comparison August 2025
BPYPN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPN stands at 4.9B. In comparison, UKOMW has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPN is priced at $13.30, while UKOMW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.03, whereas UKOMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BPYPN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to UKOMW's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPN is less volatile compared to UKOMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPN.Check UKOMW's competition here
BPYPN vs XHG Comparison August 2025
BPYPN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPN stands at 4.9B. In comparison, XHG has a market cap of 5.6K. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPN is priced at $13.30, while XHG trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.03, whereas XHG's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, BPYPN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to XHG's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPN is less volatile compared to XHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPN.Check XHG's competition here
BPYPN vs BPY Comparison August 2025
BPYPN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPN stands at 4.9B. In comparison, BPY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPN is priced at $13.30, while BPY trades at $18.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.03, whereas BPY's P/E ratio is -11.28. In terms of profitability, BPYPN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to BPY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPN is less volatile compared to BPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPN.Check BPY's competition here
BPYPN vs LMRKO Comparison August 2025
BPYPN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPN stands at 4.9B. In comparison, LMRKO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPN is priced at $13.30, while LMRKO trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.03, whereas LMRKO's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, BPYPN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LMRKO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPN is more volatile compared to LMRKO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPN.Check LMRKO's competition here
BPYPN vs OBAS Comparison August 2025
BPYPN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPN stands at 4.9B. In comparison, OBAS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPN is priced at $13.30, while OBAS trades at $12.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.03, whereas OBAS's P/E ratio is -31.48. In terms of profitability, BPYPN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to OBAS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPN is more volatile compared to OBAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPN.Check OBAS's competition here
BPYPN vs LMRKN Comparison August 2025
BPYPN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPN stands at 4.9B. In comparison, LMRKN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPN is priced at $13.30, while LMRKN trades at $25.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.03, whereas LMRKN's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, BPYPN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LMRKN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPN is more volatile compared to LMRKN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPN.Check LMRKN's competition here
BPYPN vs IRCP Comparison August 2025
BPYPN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPN stands at 4.9B. In comparison, IRCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPN is priced at $13.30, while IRCP trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.03, whereas IRCP's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, BPYPN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to IRCP's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPN is less volatile compared to IRCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPN.Check IRCP's competition here
BPYPN vs NTP Comparison August 2025
BPYPN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPN stands at 4.9B. In comparison, NTP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPN is priced at $13.30, while NTP trades at $4.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.03, whereas NTP's P/E ratio is 3.40. In terms of profitability, BPYPN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to NTP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPN is less volatile compared to NTP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPN.Check NTP's competition here
BPYPN vs LMRKP Comparison August 2025
BPYPN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPN stands at 4.9B. In comparison, LMRKP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPN is priced at $13.30, while LMRKP trades at $25.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.03, whereas LMRKP's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, BPYPN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LMRKP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPN is less volatile compared to LMRKP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPN.Check LMRKP's competition here
BPYPN vs LMRK Comparison August 2025
BPYPN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BPYPN stands at 4.9B. In comparison, LMRK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BPYPN is priced at $13.30, while LMRK trades at $16.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BPYPN currently has a P/E ratio of 6.03, whereas LMRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BPYPN's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LMRK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BPYPN is more volatile compared to LMRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BPYPN.Check LMRK's competition here