BHP Group Limited
BHP Group Limited (BHP.AX) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BHP.AX) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BHP.AX | A$41.51 | -0.53% | 210.7B | 12.10 | A$3.43 | +4.58% |
| RIO.AX | A$113.45 | -3.73% | 164.9B | 11.77 | A$9.64 | +5.11% |
| FMG.AX | A$19.59 | -1.71% | 60.2B | 10.10 | A$1.94 | +7.10% |
| S32.AX | A$2.90 | -5.23% | 13B | -36.25 | -A$0.08 | +3.45% |
| LYC.AX | A$13.77 | +1.03% | 12.9B | 275.40 | A$0.05 | N/A |
| MIN.AX | A$36.01 | +0.70% | 7B | -5.79 | -A$6.22 | N/A |
| PLS.AX | A$2.16 | +0.93% | 7B | -216.00 | -A$0.01 | N/A |
| ATM.AX | A$1.10 | -2.65% | 6.5B | 9.95 | A$0.11 | +5.24% |
| AKE.AX | A$9.83 | -5.57% | 6.3B | 9.54 | A$1.03 | N/A |
| IGO.AX | A$5.37 | +0.56% | 4.1B | -3.81 | -A$1.41 | +6.89% |
Stock Comparison
BHP.AX vs RIO.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, RIO.AX has a market cap of 164.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while RIO.AX trades at A$113.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas RIO.AX's P/E ratio is 11.77. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to RIO.AX's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is less volatile compared to RIO.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check RIO.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs FMG.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, FMG.AX has a market cap of 60.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while FMG.AX trades at A$19.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas FMG.AX's P/E ratio is 10.10. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to FMG.AX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is less volatile compared to FMG.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check FMG.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs S32.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, S32.AX has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while S32.AX trades at A$2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas S32.AX's P/E ratio is -36.25. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to S32.AX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is less volatile compared to S32.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check S32.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs LYC.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, LYC.AX has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while LYC.AX trades at A$13.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas LYC.AX's P/E ratio is 275.40. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to LYC.AX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX and LYC.AX have similar daily volatility (1.90).Check LYC.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs MIN.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, MIN.AX has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while MIN.AX trades at A$36.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas MIN.AX's P/E ratio is -5.79. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MIN.AX's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is less volatile compared to MIN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check MIN.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs PLS.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, PLS.AX has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while PLS.AX trades at A$2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas PLS.AX's P/E ratio is -216.00. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PLS.AX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is less volatile compared to PLS.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check PLS.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs ATM.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, ATM.AX has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while ATM.AX trades at A$1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas ATM.AX's P/E ratio is 9.95. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ATM.AX's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is more volatile compared to ATM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check ATM.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs AKE.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, AKE.AX has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while AKE.AX trades at A$9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas AKE.AX's P/E ratio is 9.54. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AKE.AX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is less volatile compared to AKE.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check AKE.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs IGO.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, IGO.AX has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while IGO.AX trades at A$5.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas IGO.AX's P/E ratio is -3.81. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to IGO.AX's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is less volatile compared to IGO.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check IGO.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs NIC.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, NIC.AX has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while NIC.AX trades at A$0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas NIC.AX's P/E ratio is -12.42. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NIC.AX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is less volatile compared to NIC.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check NIC.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs AVZ.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, AVZ.AX has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while AVZ.AX trades at A$0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas AVZ.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AVZ.AX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is less volatile compared to AVZ.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check AVZ.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs ILU.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, ILU.AX has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while ILU.AX trades at A$6.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas ILU.AX's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ILU.AX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is less volatile compared to ILU.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check ILU.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs DRR.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, DRR.AX has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while DRR.AX trades at A$4.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas DRR.AX's P/E ratio is 16.77. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to DRR.AX's ROE of +1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is less volatile compared to DRR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check DRR.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs LTR.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, LTR.AX has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while LTR.AX trades at A$0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas LTR.AX's P/E ratio is -40.00. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to LTR.AX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is less volatile compared to LTR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check LTR.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs ADT.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, ADT.AX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while ADT.AX trades at A$6.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas ADT.AX's P/E ratio is -12.96. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ADT.AX's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is more volatile compared to ADT.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check ADT.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs IPX.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, IPX.AX has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while IPX.AX trades at A$6.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas IPX.AX's P/E ratio is -14.68. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to IPX.AX's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is less volatile compared to IPX.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check IPX.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs PRN.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, PRN.AX has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while PRN.AX trades at A$1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas PRN.AX's P/E ratio is 21.72. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PRN.AX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is less volatile compared to PRN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check PRN.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs AZS.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, AZS.AX has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while AZS.AX trades at A$3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas AZS.AX's P/E ratio is -28.42. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AZS.AX's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is more volatile compared to AZS.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check AZS.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs AII.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, AII.AX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while AII.AX trades at A$7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas AII.AX's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AII.AX's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is more volatile compared to AII.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check AII.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs DVP.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, DVP.AX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while DVP.AX trades at A$4.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas DVP.AX's P/E ratio is -139.00. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to DVP.AX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is less volatile compared to DVP.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check DVP.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs A4N.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, A4N.AX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while A4N.AX trades at A$0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas A4N.AX's P/E ratio is -31.83. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to A4N.AX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is less volatile compared to A4N.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check A4N.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs BCI.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, BCI.AX has a market cap of 996.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while BCI.AX trades at A$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas BCI.AX's P/E ratio is -11.50. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BCI.AX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is less volatile compared to BCI.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check BCI.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs VUL.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, VUL.AX has a market cap of 855.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while VUL.AX trades at A$3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas VUL.AX's P/E ratio is -8.90. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to VUL.AX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is less volatile compared to VUL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check VUL.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs FFM.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, FFM.AX has a market cap of 787.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while FFM.AX trades at A$1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas FFM.AX's P/E ratio is -60.25. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to FFM.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is less volatile compared to FFM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check FFM.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs MAH.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, MAH.AX has a market cap of 770.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while MAH.AX trades at A$0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas MAH.AX's P/E ratio is 18.25. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MAH.AX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is less volatile compared to MAH.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check MAH.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs PMT.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, PMT.AX has a market cap of 762.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while PMT.AX trades at A$0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas PMT.AX's P/E ratio is -47.00. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PMT.AX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is less volatile compared to PMT.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check PMT.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs MCR.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, MCR.AX has a market cap of 751.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while MCR.AX trades at A$1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas MCR.AX's P/E ratio is -12.59. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MCR.AX's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is more volatile compared to MCR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check MCR.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs KLL.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, KLL.AX has a market cap of 727.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while KLL.AX trades at A$7.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas KLL.AX's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KLL.AX's ROE of -1320.48%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is less volatile compared to KLL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check KLL.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs BOE.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, BOE.AX has a market cap of 707.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while BOE.AX trades at A$1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas BOE.AX's P/E ratio is -24.36. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BOE.AX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is less volatile compared to BOE.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check BOE.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs CHN.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, CHN.AX has a market cap of 645.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while CHN.AX trades at A$1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas CHN.AX's P/E ratio is -27.67. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CHN.AX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is less volatile compared to CHN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check CHN.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs LLL.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, LLL.AX has a market cap of 608.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while LLL.AX trades at A$0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas LLL.AX's P/E ratio is -25.25. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to LLL.AX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is less volatile compared to LLL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check LLL.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs G6M.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, G6M.AX has a market cap of 548M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while G6M.AX trades at A$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas G6M.AX's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to G6M.AX's ROE of -19.70%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is more volatile compared to G6M.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check G6M.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs ARU.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, ARU.AX has a market cap of 529.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while ARU.AX trades at A$0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas ARU.AX's P/E ratio is -10.75. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ARU.AX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is less volatile compared to ARU.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check ARU.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs MLX.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, MLX.AX has a market cap of 518.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while MLX.AX trades at A$0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas MLX.AX's P/E ratio is 5.32. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MLX.AX's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is less volatile compared to MLX.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check MLX.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs LRS.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, LRS.AX has a market cap of 477.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while LRS.AX trades at A$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas LRS.AX's P/E ratio is -16.50. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to LRS.AX's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is less volatile compared to LRS.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check LRS.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs SVM.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, SVM.AX has a market cap of 475.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while SVM.AX trades at A$0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas SVM.AX's P/E ratio is -14.70. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SVM.AX's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is less volatile compared to SVM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check SVM.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs CAY.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, CAY.AX has a market cap of 473M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while CAY.AX trades at A$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas CAY.AX's P/E ratio is -26.50. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CAY.AX's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is less volatile compared to CAY.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check CAY.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs JMS.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, JMS.AX has a market cap of 451M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while JMS.AX trades at A$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas JMS.AX's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to JMS.AX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is less volatile compared to JMS.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check JMS.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs MMI.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, MMI.AX has a market cap of 439.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while MMI.AX trades at A$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas MMI.AX's P/E ratio is -7.20. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MMI.AX's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is less volatile compared to MMI.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check MMI.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs MAUCA.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, MAUCA.AX has a market cap of 411M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while MAUCA.AX trades at A$1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas MAUCA.AX's P/E ratio is -19.33. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MAUCA.AX's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is more volatile compared to MAUCA.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check MAUCA.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs SYR.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, SYR.AX has a market cap of 405.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while SYR.AX trades at A$0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas SYR.AX's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SYR.AX's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is less volatile compared to SYR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check SYR.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs MEI.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, MEI.AX has a market cap of 382.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while MEI.AX trades at A$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas MEI.AX's P/E ratio is -7.25. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MEI.AX's ROE of -2.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is less volatile compared to MEI.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check MEI.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs RXM.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, RXM.AX has a market cap of 375.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while RXM.AX trades at A$0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas RXM.AX's P/E ratio is -23.50. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to RXM.AX's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is more volatile compared to RXM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check RXM.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs MAU.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, MAU.AX has a market cap of 369M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while MAU.AX trades at A$1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas MAU.AX's P/E ratio is -22.92. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MAU.AX's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is less volatile compared to MAU.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check MAU.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs LOT.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, LOT.AX has a market cap of 367.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while LOT.AX trades at A$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas LOT.AX's P/E ratio is -7.75. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to LOT.AX's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is less volatile compared to LOT.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check LOT.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs LPI.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, LPI.AX has a market cap of 365.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while LPI.AX trades at A$0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas LPI.AX's P/E ratio is -19.00. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to LPI.AX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is more volatile compared to LPI.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check LPI.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs SYA.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, SYA.AX has a market cap of 323.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while SYA.AX trades at A$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas SYA.AX's P/E ratio is -2.80. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SYA.AX's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is less volatile compared to SYA.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check SYA.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs INR.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, INR.AX has a market cap of 319.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while INR.AX trades at A$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas INR.AX's P/E ratio is -12.50. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to INR.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is less volatile compared to INR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check INR.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs AMI.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, AMI.AX has a market cap of 313.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while AMI.AX trades at A$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas AMI.AX's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AMI.AX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is less volatile compared to AMI.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check AMI.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs NTU.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, NTU.AX has a market cap of 309.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while NTU.AX trades at A$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas NTU.AX's P/E ratio is -3.70. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NTU.AX's ROE of +54.52%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is less volatile compared to NTU.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check NTU.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs PLL.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, PLL.AX has a market cap of 307.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while PLL.AX trades at A$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas PLL.AX's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PLL.AX's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is less volatile compared to PLL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check PLL.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs BSE.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, BSE.AX has a market cap of 298M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while BSE.AX trades at A$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas BSE.AX's P/E ratio is -4.25. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BSE.AX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is less volatile compared to BSE.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check BSE.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs BNZ.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, BNZ.AX has a market cap of 297.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while BNZ.AX trades at A$1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas BNZ.AX's P/E ratio is -28.75. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BNZ.AX's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is less volatile compared to BNZ.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check BNZ.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs KP2.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, KP2.AX has a market cap of 286.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while KP2.AX trades at A$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas KP2.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KP2.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is more volatile compared to KP2.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check KP2.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs LIN.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, LIN.AX has a market cap of 266.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while LIN.AX trades at A$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas LIN.AX's P/E ratio is -22.50. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to LIN.AX's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is less volatile compared to LIN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check LIN.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs CXO.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, CXO.AX has a market cap of 257.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while CXO.AX trades at A$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas CXO.AX's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CXO.AX's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is less volatile compared to CXO.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check CXO.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs RHK.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, RHK.AX has a market cap of 254M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while RHK.AX trades at A$1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas RHK.AX's P/E ratio is -24.00. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to RHK.AX's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is more volatile compared to RHK.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check RHK.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs SO4.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, SO4.AX has a market cap of 253.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while SO4.AX trades at A$0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas SO4.AX's P/E ratio is -31.00. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SO4.AX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is less volatile compared to SO4.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check SO4.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs MRL.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, MRL.AX has a market cap of 251.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while MRL.AX trades at A$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas MRL.AX's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MRL.AX's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is less volatile compared to MRL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check MRL.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs TLG.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, TLG.AX has a market cap of 245.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while TLG.AX trades at A$0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas TLG.AX's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TLG.AX's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is less volatile compared to TLG.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check TLG.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs NWC.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, NWC.AX has a market cap of 243.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while NWC.AX trades at A$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas NWC.AX's P/E ratio is -6.70. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NWC.AX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is more volatile compared to NWC.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check NWC.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs GRR.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, GRR.AX has a market cap of 243M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while GRR.AX trades at A$0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas GRR.AX's P/E ratio is 4.20. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GRR.AX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is less volatile compared to GRR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check GRR.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs FEX.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, FEX.AX has a market cap of 229.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while FEX.AX trades at A$0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas FEX.AX's P/E ratio is 15.50. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to FEX.AX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is less volatile compared to FEX.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check FEX.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs OMH.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, OMH.AX has a market cap of 225.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while OMH.AX trades at A$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas OMH.AX's P/E ratio is 14.75. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to OMH.AX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is more volatile compared to OMH.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check OMH.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs TVN.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, TVN.AX has a market cap of 218.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while TVN.AX trades at A$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas TVN.AX's P/E ratio is -2.62. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TVN.AX's ROE of -3.57%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is less volatile compared to TVN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check TVN.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs RHI.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, RHI.AX has a market cap of 218M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while RHI.AX trades at A$3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas RHI.AX's P/E ratio is 1.38. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to RHI.AX's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is more volatile compared to RHI.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check RHI.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs ARR.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, ARR.AX has a market cap of 199.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while ARR.AX trades at A$0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas ARR.AX's P/E ratio is -35.50. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ARR.AX's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is less volatile compared to ARR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check ARR.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs AIS.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, AIS.AX has a market cap of 188.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while AIS.AX trades at A$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas AIS.AX's P/E ratio is 9.75. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AIS.AX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is less volatile compared to AIS.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check AIS.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs CTM.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, CTM.AX has a market cap of 186.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while CTM.AX trades at A$0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas CTM.AX's P/E ratio is -9.37. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CTM.AX's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is less volatile compared to CTM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check CTM.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs AUT.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, AUT.AX has a market cap of 180.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while AUT.AX trades at A$0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas AUT.AX's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AUT.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is less volatile compared to AUT.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check AUT.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs WA8.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, WA8.AX has a market cap of 178.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while WA8.AX trades at A$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas WA8.AX's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to WA8.AX's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is less volatile compared to WA8.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check WA8.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs AUE.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, AUE.AX has a market cap of 173.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while AUE.AX trades at A$0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas AUE.AX's P/E ratio is -17.33. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AUE.AX's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is more volatile compared to AUE.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check AUE.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs ENR.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, ENR.AX has a market cap of 172.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while ENR.AX trades at A$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas ENR.AX's P/E ratio is -34.50. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ENR.AX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is less volatile compared to ENR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check ENR.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs VIA.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, VIA.AX has a market cap of 166.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while VIA.AX trades at A$2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas VIA.AX's P/E ratio is 200.00. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to VIA.AX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is less volatile compared to VIA.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check VIA.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs QGL.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, QGL.AX has a market cap of 165.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while QGL.AX trades at A$0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas QGL.AX's P/E ratio is -24.00. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to QGL.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is less volatile compared to QGL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check QGL.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs RNU.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, RNU.AX has a market cap of 165.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while RNU.AX trades at A$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas RNU.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to RNU.AX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is less volatile compared to RNU.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check RNU.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs EGR.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, EGR.AX has a market cap of 154.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while EGR.AX trades at A$0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas EGR.AX's P/E ratio is -34.00. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to EGR.AX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is less volatile compared to EGR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check EGR.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs ZEO.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, ZEO.AX has a market cap of 152.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while ZEO.AX trades at A$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas ZEO.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ZEO.AX's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is less volatile compared to ZEO.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check ZEO.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs ETM.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, ETM.AX has a market cap of 152.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while ETM.AX trades at A$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas ETM.AX's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ETM.AX's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is less volatile compared to ETM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check ETM.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs CII.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, CII.AX has a market cap of 148.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while CII.AX trades at A$1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas CII.AX's P/E ratio is 5.84. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CII.AX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is more volatile compared to CII.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check CII.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs LNR.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, LNR.AX has a market cap of 147.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while LNR.AX trades at A$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas LNR.AX's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to LNR.AX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is less volatile compared to LNR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check LNR.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs A1G.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, A1G.AX has a market cap of 147.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while A1G.AX trades at A$0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas A1G.AX's P/E ratio is -9.33. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to A1G.AX's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is less volatile compared to A1G.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check A1G.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs NCZ.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, NCZ.AX has a market cap of 146.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while NCZ.AX trades at A$1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas NCZ.AX's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NCZ.AX's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is more volatile compared to NCZ.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check NCZ.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs ATR.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, ATR.AX has a market cap of 146.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while ATR.AX trades at A$0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas ATR.AX's P/E ratio is -4.37. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ATR.AX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is more volatile compared to ATR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check ATR.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs ASN.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, ASN.AX has a market cap of 145.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while ASN.AX trades at A$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas ASN.AX's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ASN.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is less volatile compared to ASN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check ASN.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs PEK.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, PEK.AX has a market cap of 144.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while PEK.AX trades at A$0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas PEK.AX's P/E ratio is -8.37. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PEK.AX's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is more volatile compared to PEK.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check PEK.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs STA.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, STA.AX has a market cap of 138.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while STA.AX trades at A$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas STA.AX's P/E ratio is -9.50. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to STA.AX's ROE of -2.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is less volatile compared to STA.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check STA.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs ESS.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, ESS.AX has a market cap of 135.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while ESS.AX trades at A$0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas ESS.AX's P/E ratio is -50.00. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ESS.AX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is less volatile compared to ESS.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check ESS.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs GLN.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, GLN.AX has a market cap of 135M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while GLN.AX trades at A$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas GLN.AX's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GLN.AX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is less volatile compared to GLN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check GLN.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs PSC.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, PSC.AX has a market cap of 134.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while PSC.AX trades at A$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas PSC.AX's P/E ratio is -9.60. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PSC.AX's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is less volatile compared to PSC.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check PSC.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs NMR.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, NMR.AX has a market cap of 132.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while NMR.AX trades at A$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas NMR.AX's P/E ratio is -6.75. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NMR.AX's ROE of +20.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is less volatile compared to NMR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check NMR.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs ASM.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, ASM.AX has a market cap of 126.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while ASM.AX trades at A$0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas ASM.AX's P/E ratio is -3.14. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ASM.AX's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is less volatile compared to ASM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check ASM.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs MLG.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, MLG.AX has a market cap of 125.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while MLG.AX trades at A$0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas MLG.AX's P/E ratio is 16.20. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MLG.AX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is less volatile compared to MLG.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check MLG.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs A11.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, A11.AX has a market cap of 124.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while A11.AX trades at A$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas A11.AX's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to A11.AX's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is less volatile compared to A11.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check A11.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs EUR.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, EUR.AX has a market cap of 120.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while EUR.AX trades at A$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas EUR.AX's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to EUR.AX's ROE of -3.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is less volatile compared to EUR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check EUR.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs NVA.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, NVA.AX has a market cap of 120.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while NVA.AX trades at A$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas NVA.AX's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NVA.AX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is less volatile compared to NVA.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check NVA.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs STM.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, STM.AX has a market cap of 117.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while STM.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas STM.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to STM.AX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is less volatile compared to STM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check STM.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs BSX.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, BSX.AX has a market cap of 117.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while BSX.AX trades at A$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas BSX.AX's P/E ratio is -3.45. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BSX.AX's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is less volatile compared to BSX.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check BSX.AX's competition here
BHP.AX vs FHE.AX Comparison August 2025
BHP.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP.AX stands at 210.7B. In comparison, FHE.AX has a market cap of 110.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP.AX is priced at A$41.51, while FHE.AX trades at A$0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 12.10, whereas FHE.AX's P/E ratio is -5.37. In terms of profitability, BHP.AX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to FHE.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP.AX is less volatile compared to FHE.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.AX.Check FHE.AX's competition here