Ball Corporation
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for BALL
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for BALL
Ball Corporation (BALL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BALL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaging & Containers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BALL | $59.97 | -0.66% | 16B | 18.17 | $3.30 | +1.33% |
| BLL | $69.49 | -3.37% | 21.8B | 28.62 | $2.43 | +1.08% |
| SW | $39.29 | -2.09% | 20.6B | 29.54 | $1.33 | +4.44% |
| AMCR | $39.93 | -1.89% | 18.4B | 30.02 | $1.33 | +6.45% |
| IP | $34.79 | -2.44% | 18.4B | -6.20 | -$5.61 | +5.32% |
| PKG | $204.46 | -3.22% | 18.2B | 23.86 | $8.57 | +2.45% |
| WRK | $51.51 | +3.54% | 13.3B | 42.57 | $1.21 | +2.30% |
| CCK | $102.76 | -1.02% | 11.6B | 16.11 | $6.38 | +1.10% |
| BERY | $67.58 | -2.93% | 7.8B | 14.95 | $4.52 | N/A |
| SEE | $42.08 | -0.05% | 6.2B | 14.07 | $2.99 | +1.90% |
Stock Comparison
BALL vs BLL Comparison April 2026
BALL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BALL stands at 16B. In comparison, BLL has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BALL is priced at $59.97, while BLL trades at $69.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BALL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas BLL's P/E ratio is 28.62. In terms of profitability, BALL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BLL's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BALL is less volatile compared to BLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BALL.Check BLL's competition here
BALL vs SW Comparison April 2026
BALL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BALL stands at 16B. In comparison, SW has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BALL is priced at $59.97, while SW trades at $39.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BALL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas SW's P/E ratio is 29.54. In terms of profitability, BALL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BALL is less volatile compared to SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BALL.Check SW's competition here
BALL vs AMCR Comparison April 2026
BALL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BALL stands at 16B. In comparison, AMCR has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BALL is priced at $59.97, while AMCR trades at $39.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BALL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas AMCR's P/E ratio is 30.02. In terms of profitability, BALL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AMCR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BALL is less volatile compared to AMCR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BALL.Check AMCR's competition here
BALL vs IP Comparison April 2026
BALL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BALL stands at 16B. In comparison, IP has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BALL is priced at $59.97, while IP trades at $34.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BALL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas IP's P/E ratio is -6.20. In terms of profitability, BALL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IP's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BALL is less volatile compared to IP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BALL.Check IP's competition here
BALL vs PKG Comparison April 2026
BALL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BALL stands at 16B. In comparison, PKG has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BALL is priced at $59.97, while PKG trades at $204.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BALL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas PKG's P/E ratio is 23.86. In terms of profitability, BALL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PKG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BALL is less volatile compared to PKG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BALL.Check PKG's competition here
BALL vs WRK Comparison April 2026
BALL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BALL stands at 16B. In comparison, WRK has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BALL is priced at $59.97, while WRK trades at $51.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BALL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas WRK's P/E ratio is 42.57. In terms of profitability, BALL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WRK's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BALL is less volatile compared to WRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BALL.Check WRK's competition here
BALL vs CCK Comparison April 2026
BALL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BALL stands at 16B. In comparison, CCK has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BALL is priced at $59.97, while CCK trades at $102.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BALL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas CCK's P/E ratio is 16.11. In terms of profitability, BALL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CCK's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BALL is less volatile compared to CCK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BALL.Check CCK's competition here
BALL vs BERY Comparison April 2026
BALL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BALL stands at 16B. In comparison, BERY has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BALL is priced at $59.97, while BERY trades at $67.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BALL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas BERY's P/E ratio is 14.95. In terms of profitability, BALL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BERY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BALL is less volatile compared to BERY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BALL.Check BERY's competition here
BALL vs SEE Comparison April 2026
BALL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BALL stands at 16B. In comparison, SEE has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BALL is priced at $59.97, while SEE trades at $42.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BALL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas SEE's P/E ratio is 14.07. In terms of profitability, BALL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SEE's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, BALL is more volatile compared to SEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BALL.Check SEE's competition here
BALL vs SON Comparison April 2026
BALL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BALL stands at 16B. In comparison, SON has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BALL is priced at $59.97, while SON trades at $54.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BALL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas SON's P/E ratio is 9.25. In terms of profitability, BALL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SON's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BALL is less volatile compared to SON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BALL.Check SON's competition here
BALL vs REYN Comparison April 2026
BALL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BALL stands at 16B. In comparison, REYN has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BALL is priced at $59.97, while REYN trades at $21.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BALL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas REYN's P/E ratio is 14.80. In terms of profitability, BALL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to REYN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BALL is more volatile compared to REYN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BALL.Check REYN's competition here
BALL vs SLGN Comparison April 2026
BALL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BALL stands at 16B. In comparison, SLGN has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BALL is priced at $59.97, while SLGN trades at $39.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BALL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas SLGN's P/E ratio is 14.62. In terms of profitability, BALL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SLGN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BALL is less volatile compared to SLGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BALL.Check SLGN's competition here
BALL vs GEF-B Comparison April 2026
BALL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BALL stands at 16B. In comparison, GEF-B has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BALL is priced at $59.97, while GEF-B trades at $88.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BALL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas GEF-B's P/E ratio is 24.32. In terms of profitability, BALL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GEF-B's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, BALL is less volatile compared to GEF-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BALL.Check GEF-B's competition here
BALL vs PTVE Comparison April 2026
BALL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BALL stands at 16B. In comparison, PTVE has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BALL is priced at $59.97, while PTVE trades at $18.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BALL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas PTVE's P/E ratio is -23.39. In terms of profitability, BALL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PTVE's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BALL is more volatile compared to PTVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BALL.Check PTVE's competition here
BALL vs GEF Comparison April 2026
BALL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BALL stands at 16B. In comparison, GEF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BALL is priced at $59.97, while GEF trades at $66.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BALL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas GEF's P/E ratio is 27.67. In terms of profitability, BALL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GEF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, BALL is more volatile compared to GEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BALL.Check GEF's competition here
BALL vs GPK Comparison April 2026
BALL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BALL stands at 16B. In comparison, GPK has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BALL is priced at $59.97, while GPK trades at $9.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BALL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas GPK's P/E ratio is 6.54. In terms of profitability, BALL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GPK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BALL is less volatile compared to GPK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BALL.Check GPK's competition here
BALL vs AMBP Comparison April 2026
BALL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BALL stands at 16B. In comparison, AMBP has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BALL is priced at $59.97, while AMBP trades at $4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BALL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas AMBP's P/E ratio is -204.50. In terms of profitability, BALL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AMBP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BALL is less volatile compared to AMBP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BALL.Check AMBP's competition here
BALL vs OI Comparison April 2026
BALL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BALL stands at 16B. In comparison, OI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BALL is priced at $59.97, while OI trades at $10.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BALL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas OI's P/E ratio is -12.32. In terms of profitability, BALL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OI's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BALL is less volatile compared to OI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BALL.Check OI's competition here
BALL vs TRS Comparison April 2026
BALL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BALL stands at 16B. In comparison, TRS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BALL is priced at $59.97, while TRS trades at $35.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BALL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas TRS's P/E ratio is 20.04. In terms of profitability, BALL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TRS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BALL is less volatile compared to TRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BALL.Check TRS's competition here
BALL vs MYE Comparison April 2026
BALL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BALL stands at 16B. In comparison, MYE has a market cap of 788.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BALL is priced at $59.97, while MYE trades at $21.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BALL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas MYE's P/E ratio is 22.68. In terms of profitability, BALL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MYE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BALL is less volatile compared to MYE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BALL.Check MYE's competition here
BALL vs FFHL Comparison April 2026
BALL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BALL stands at 16B. In comparison, FFHL has a market cap of 695.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BALL is priced at $59.97, while FFHL trades at $8.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BALL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas FFHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BALL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FFHL's ROE of -46.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BALL is less volatile compared to FFHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BALL.Check FFHL's competition here
BALL vs KRT Comparison April 2026
BALL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BALL stands at 16B. In comparison, KRT has a market cap of 559.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BALL is priced at $59.97, while KRT trades at $27.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BALL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas KRT's P/E ratio is 17.84. In terms of profitability, BALL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KRT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BALL is less volatile compared to KRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BALL.Check KRT's competition here
BALL vs PACK Comparison April 2026
BALL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BALL stands at 16B. In comparison, PACK has a market cap of 303.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BALL is priced at $59.97, while PACK trades at $3.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BALL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas PACK's P/E ratio is -7.96. In terms of profitability, BALL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PACK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BALL is less volatile compared to PACK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BALL.Check PACK's competition here
BALL vs OCTO Comparison April 2026
BALL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BALL stands at 16B. In comparison, OCTO has a market cap of 25.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BALL is priced at $59.97, while OCTO trades at $8.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BALL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas OCTO's P/E ratio is -1.48. In terms of profitability, BALL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OCTO's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, BALL is less volatile compared to OCTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BALL.Check OCTO's competition here
BALL vs TUP Comparison April 2026
BALL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BALL stands at 16B. In comparison, TUP has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BALL is priced at $59.97, while TUP trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BALL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas TUP's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, BALL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TUP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BALL is less volatile compared to TUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BALL.Check TUP's competition here
BALL vs MGIH Comparison April 2026
BALL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BALL stands at 16B. In comparison, MGIH has a market cap of 15.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BALL is priced at $59.97, while MGIH trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BALL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas MGIH's P/E ratio is -2.52. In terms of profitability, BALL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MGIH's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BALL is more volatile compared to MGIH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BALL.Check MGIH's competition here
BALL vs DSS Comparison April 2026
BALL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BALL stands at 16B. In comparison, DSS has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BALL is priced at $59.97, while DSS trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BALL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas DSS's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, BALL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DSS's ROE of -2.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BALL is less volatile compared to DSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BALL.Check DSS's competition here
BALL vs YHGJ Comparison April 2026
BALL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BALL stands at 16B. In comparison, YHGJ has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BALL is priced at $59.97, while YHGJ trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BALL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas YHGJ's P/E ratio is -2.81. In terms of profitability, BALL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to YHGJ's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BALL is more volatile compared to YHGJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BALL.Check YHGJ's competition here
BALL vs TYDE Comparison April 2026
BALL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BALL stands at 16B. In comparison, TYDE has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BALL is priced at $59.97, while TYDE trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BALL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas TYDE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, BALL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TYDE's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, BALL is less volatile compared to TYDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BALL.Check TYDE's competition here
BALL vs ARD Comparison April 2026
BALL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BALL stands at 16B. In comparison, ARD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BALL is priced at $59.97, while ARD trades at $24.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BALL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas ARD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BALL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ARD's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BALL is less volatile compared to ARD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BALL.Check ARD's competition here
BALL vs UNFL Comparison April 2026
BALL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BALL stands at 16B. In comparison, UNFL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BALL is priced at $59.97, while UNFL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BALL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas UNFL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BALL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to UNFL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. BALL has daily volatility of 2.17 and UNFL has daily volatility of N/A.Check UNFL's competition here