Atmos Energy Corporation
Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ATO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Regulated Gas Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATO | $157.71 | +0.39% | 25.1B | 22.03 | $7.16 | +2.16% |
NI | $41.90 | +0.50% | 19.7B | 22.65 | $1.85 | +2.60% |
NIMC | $99.69 | -1.60% | 10.8B | 64.69 | $1.54 | +2.60% |
NI-PB | $25.00 | +0.04% | 10.3B | 16.22 | $1.54 | +2.60% |
UGI | $35.84 | -1.86% | 7.7B | 14.75 | $2.43 | +4.16% |
SWX | $78.37 | -0.56% | 5.6B | 25.12 | $3.12 | +3.16% |
BIPC | $41.65 | -0.93% | 5B | -20.33 | -$2.05 | +4.00% |
UGIC | $57.78 | +0.76% | 4.9B | 8.22 | $7.03 | +4.16% |
NJR | $45.89 | -0.37% | 4.6B | 11.14 | $4.12 | +3.93% |
SR | $76.73 | +0.21% | 4.5B | 19.62 | $3.91 | +4.05% |
Stock Comparison
ATO vs NI Comparison July 2025
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 25.1B. In comparison, NI has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $157.71, while NI trades at $41.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.03, whereas NI's P/E ratio is 22.65. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is less volatile compared to NI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check NI's competition here
ATO vs NIMC Comparison July 2025
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 25.1B. In comparison, NIMC has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $157.71, while NIMC trades at $99.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.03, whereas NIMC's P/E ratio is 64.69. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NIMC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is less volatile compared to NIMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check NIMC's competition here
ATO vs NI-PB Comparison July 2025
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 25.1B. In comparison, NI-PB has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $157.71, while NI-PB trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.03, whereas NI-PB's P/E ratio is 16.22. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NI-PB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is more volatile compared to NI-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check NI-PB's competition here
ATO vs UGI Comparison July 2025
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 25.1B. In comparison, UGI has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $157.71, while UGI trades at $35.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.03, whereas UGI's P/E ratio is 14.75. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UGI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is less volatile compared to UGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check UGI's competition here
ATO vs SWX Comparison July 2025
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 25.1B. In comparison, SWX has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $157.71, while SWX trades at $78.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.03, whereas SWX's P/E ratio is 25.12. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SWX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is less volatile compared to SWX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check SWX's competition here
ATO vs BIPC Comparison July 2025
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 25.1B. In comparison, BIPC has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $157.71, while BIPC trades at $41.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.03, whereas BIPC's P/E ratio is -20.33. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BIPC's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is less volatile compared to BIPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check BIPC's competition here
ATO vs UGIC Comparison July 2025
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 25.1B. In comparison, UGIC has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $157.71, while UGIC trades at $57.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.03, whereas UGIC's P/E ratio is 8.22. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UGIC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is less volatile compared to UGIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check UGIC's competition here
ATO vs NJR Comparison July 2025
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 25.1B. In comparison, NJR has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $157.71, while NJR trades at $45.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.03, whereas NJR's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NJR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is more volatile compared to NJR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check NJR's competition here
ATO vs SR Comparison July 2025
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 25.1B. In comparison, SR has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $157.71, while SR trades at $76.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.03, whereas SR's P/E ratio is 19.62. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is less volatile compared to SR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check SR's competition here
ATO vs SR-PA Comparison July 2025
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 25.1B. In comparison, SR-PA has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $157.71, while SR-PA trades at $24.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.03, whereas SR-PA's P/E ratio is 5.95. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SR-PA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is more volatile compared to SR-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check SR-PA's competition here
ATO vs OGS Comparison July 2025
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 25.1B. In comparison, OGS has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $157.71, while OGS trades at $73.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.03, whereas OGS's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OGS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is less volatile compared to OGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check OGS's competition here
ATO vs PCG-PI Comparison July 2025
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 25.1B. In comparison, PCG-PI has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $157.71, while PCG-PI trades at $15.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.03, whereas PCG-PI's P/E ratio is 2.42. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PCG-PI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is more volatile compared to PCG-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check PCG-PI's competition here
ATO vs CPK Comparison July 2025
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 25.1B. In comparison, CPK has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $157.71, while CPK trades at $121.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.03, whereas CPK's P/E ratio is 22.50. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CPK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is less volatile compared to CPK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check CPK's competition here
ATO vs CTRI Comparison July 2025
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 25.1B. In comparison, CTRI has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $157.71, while CTRI trades at $20.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.03, whereas CTRI's P/E ratio is 2096.00. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CTRI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is less volatile compared to CTRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check CTRI's competition here
ATO vs NWN Comparison July 2025
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 25.1B. In comparison, NWN has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $157.71, while NWN trades at $40.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.03, whereas NWN's P/E ratio is 16.19. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NWN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is less volatile compared to NWN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check NWN's competition here
ATO vs SPH Comparison July 2025
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 25.1B. In comparison, SPH has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $157.71, while SPH trades at $18.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.03, whereas SPH's P/E ratio is 12.73. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SPH's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is less volatile compared to SPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check SPH's competition here
ATO vs NFE Comparison July 2025
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 25.1B. In comparison, NFE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $157.71, while NFE trades at $4.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.03, whereas NFE's P/E ratio is -1.85. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NFE's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is less volatile compared to NFE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check NFE's competition here
ATO vs OPALW Comparison July 2025
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 25.1B. In comparison, OPALW has a market cap of 634.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $157.71, while OPALW trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.03, whereas OPALW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OPALW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is less volatile compared to OPALW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check OPALW's competition here
ATO vs RGCO Comparison July 2025
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 25.1B. In comparison, RGCO has a market cap of 213.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $157.71, while RGCO trades at $20.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.03, whereas RGCO's P/E ratio is 16.15. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RGCO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is more volatile compared to RGCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check RGCO's competition here
ATO vs OPAL Comparison July 2025
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 25.1B. In comparison, OPAL has a market cap of 74.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $157.71, while OPAL trades at $2.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.03, whereas OPAL's P/E ratio is 128.50. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OPAL's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is less volatile compared to OPAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check OPAL's competition here
ATO vs MIC Comparison July 2025
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 25.1B. In comparison, MIC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $157.71, while MIC trades at $4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.03, whereas MIC's P/E ratio is 0.13. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MIC's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is more volatile compared to MIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check MIC's competition here