Atmos Energy Corporation
Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ATO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Regulated Gas Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATO | $188.58 | +0.96% | 31.2B | 24.58 | $7.67 | +1.98% |
| NI | $47.39 | +1.50% | 22.7B | 24.31 | $1.95 | +2.41% |
| SR-PA | $99.74 | -1.59% | 16.5B | 24.55 | $4.04 | +3.49% |
| NIMC | $99.69 | -1.60% | 10.8B | 64.69 | $1.54 | +7.77% |
| NI-PB | $25.00 | +0.04% | 10.3B | 16.22 | $1.54 | +2.41% |
| UGI | $37.13 | +0.81% | 8B | 13.81 | $2.69 | +4.04% |
| SWX | $88.01 | +0.79% | 6.4B | 27.09 | $3.25 | +2.82% |
| BIPC | $46.82 | -0.17% | 5.6B | -23.18 | -$2.02 | +3.71% |
| NJR | $55.06 | +1.36% | 5.6B | 17.05 | $3.23 | +3.41% |
| OGS | $87.49 | +0.69% | 5.5B | 20.02 | $4.37 | +3.08% |
Stock Comparison
ATO vs NI Comparison March 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 31.2B. In comparison, NI has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $188.58, while NI trades at $47.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.58, whereas NI's P/E ratio is 24.31. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is more volatile compared to NI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check NI's competition here
ATO vs SR-PA Comparison March 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 31.2B. In comparison, SR-PA has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $188.58, while SR-PA trades at $99.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.58, whereas SR-PA's P/E ratio is 24.55. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SR-PA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is less volatile compared to SR-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check SR-PA's competition here
ATO vs NIMC Comparison March 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 31.2B. In comparison, NIMC has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $188.58, while NIMC trades at $99.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.58, whereas NIMC's P/E ratio is 64.69. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NIMC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is less volatile compared to NIMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check NIMC's competition here
ATO vs NI-PB Comparison March 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 31.2B. In comparison, NI-PB has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $188.58, while NI-PB trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.58, whereas NI-PB's P/E ratio is 16.22. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NI-PB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is more volatile compared to NI-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check NI-PB's competition here
ATO vs UGI Comparison March 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 31.2B. In comparison, UGI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $188.58, while UGI trades at $37.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.58, whereas UGI's P/E ratio is 13.81. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UGI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is more volatile compared to UGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check UGI's competition here
ATO vs SWX Comparison March 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 31.2B. In comparison, SWX has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $188.58, while SWX trades at $88.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.58, whereas SWX's P/E ratio is 27.09. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SWX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is less volatile compared to SWX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check SWX's competition here
ATO vs BIPC Comparison March 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 31.2B. In comparison, BIPC has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $188.58, while BIPC trades at $46.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.58, whereas BIPC's P/E ratio is -23.18. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BIPC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is less volatile compared to BIPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check BIPC's competition here
ATO vs NJR Comparison March 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 31.2B. In comparison, NJR has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $188.58, while NJR trades at $55.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.58, whereas NJR's P/E ratio is 17.05. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NJR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is less volatile compared to NJR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check NJR's competition here
ATO vs OGS Comparison March 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 31.2B. In comparison, OGS has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $188.58, while OGS trades at $87.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.58, whereas OGS's P/E ratio is 20.02. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OGS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is more volatile compared to OGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check OGS's competition here
ATO vs SR Comparison March 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 31.2B. In comparison, SR has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $188.58, while SR trades at $92.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.58, whereas SR's P/E ratio is 20.30. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is less volatile compared to SR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check SR's competition here
ATO vs UGIC Comparison March 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 31.2B. In comparison, UGIC has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $188.58, while UGIC trades at $57.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.58, whereas UGIC's P/E ratio is 8.22. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UGIC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is less volatile compared to UGIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check UGIC's competition here
ATO vs PCG-PI Comparison March 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 31.2B. In comparison, PCG-PI has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $188.58, while PCG-PI trades at $16.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.58, whereas PCG-PI's P/E ratio is 2.70. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PCG-PI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is more volatile compared to PCG-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check PCG-PI's competition here
ATO vs CPK Comparison March 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 31.2B. In comparison, CPK has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $188.58, while CPK trades at $130.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.58, whereas CPK's P/E ratio is 21.89. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CPK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is less volatile compared to CPK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check CPK's competition here
ATO vs CTRI Comparison March 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 31.2B. In comparison, CTRI has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $188.58, while CTRI trades at $29.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.58, whereas CTRI's P/E ratio is 117.16. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CTRI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is less volatile compared to CTRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check CTRI's competition here
ATO vs NWN Comparison March 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 31.2B. In comparison, NWN has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $188.58, while NWN trades at $52.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.58, whereas NWN's P/E ratio is 18.97. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NWN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is less volatile compared to NWN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check NWN's competition here
ATO vs SPH Comparison March 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 31.2B. In comparison, SPH has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $188.58, while SPH trades at $20.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.58, whereas SPH's P/E ratio is 10.14. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SPH's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is less volatile compared to SPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check SPH's competition here
ATO vs OPALW Comparison March 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 31.2B. In comparison, OPALW has a market cap of 634.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $188.58, while OPALW trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.58, whereas OPALW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OPALW's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is less volatile compared to OPALW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check OPALW's competition here
ATO vs NFE Comparison March 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 31.2B. In comparison, NFE has a market cap of 307.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $188.58, while NFE trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.58, whereas NFE's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NFE's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is less volatile compared to NFE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check NFE's competition here
ATO vs RGCO Comparison March 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 31.2B. In comparison, RGCO has a market cap of 225.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $188.58, while RGCO trades at $21.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.58, whereas RGCO's P/E ratio is 17.35. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RGCO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is less volatile compared to RGCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check RGCO's competition here
ATO vs SRJN Comparison March 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 31.2B. In comparison, SRJN has a market cap of 199M. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $188.58, while SRJN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.58, whereas SRJN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SRJN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ATO has daily volatility of 1.31 and SRJN has daily volatility of N/A.Check SRJN's competition here
ATO vs OPAL Comparison March 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 31.2B. In comparison, OPAL has a market cap of 61.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $188.58, while OPAL trades at $2.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.58, whereas OPAL's P/E ratio is 105.50. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OPAL's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is less volatile compared to OPAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check OPAL's competition here
ATO vs MIC Comparison March 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 31.2B. In comparison, MIC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $188.58, while MIC trades at $4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.58, whereas MIC's P/E ratio is 0.13. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MIC's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is more volatile compared to MIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check MIC's competition here