Atmos Energy Corporation
Atmos Energy Corporation ATO Peers
See (ATO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Regulated Gas Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATO | $151.51 | -1.39% | 24.1B | 21.17 | $7.16 | +2.21% |
| NI | $39.41 | -1.62% | 18.6B | 21.30 | $1.85 | +2.71% |
| NIMC | $99.69 | -1.60% | 10.8B | 64.69 | $1.54 | +2.71% |
| NI-PB | $25.00 | +0.04% | 10.3B | 16.22 | $1.54 | +2.71% |
| UGI | $35.20 | +0.34% | 7.6B | 14.49 | $2.43 | +4.26% |
| SWX | $73.75 | -1.95% | 5.3B | 23.63 | $3.12 | +3.29% |
| BIPC | $42.45 | +0.88% | 5.1B | -20.71 | -$2.05 | +3.96% |
| UGIC | $57.78 | +0.76% | 4.9B | 8.22 | $7.03 | +4.26% |
| NJR | $45.05 | -0.42% | 4.5B | 10.94 | $4.12 | +3.97% |
| SR-PA | $23.88 | +0.55% | 4.4B | 5.90 | $4.04 | +4.20% |
Stock Comparison
ATO vs NI Comparison
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 24.1B. In comparison, NI has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $151.51, while NI trades at $39.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.17, whereas NI's P/E ratio is 21.30. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is less volatile compared to NI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.
ATO vs NIMC Comparison
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 24.1B. In comparison, NIMC has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $151.51, while NIMC trades at $99.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.17, whereas NIMC's P/E ratio is 64.69. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NIMC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is more volatile compared to NIMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.
ATO vs NI-PB Comparison
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 24.1B. In comparison, NI-PB has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $151.51, while NI-PB trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.17, whereas NI-PB's P/E ratio is 16.22. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NI-PB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is more volatile compared to NI-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.
ATO vs UGI Comparison
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 24.1B. In comparison, UGI has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $151.51, while UGI trades at $35.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.17, whereas UGI's P/E ratio is 14.49. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UGI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is more volatile compared to UGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.
ATO vs SWX Comparison
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 24.1B. In comparison, SWX has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $151.51, while SWX trades at $73.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.17, whereas SWX's P/E ratio is 23.63. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SWX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is more volatile compared to SWX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.
ATO vs BIPC Comparison
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 24.1B. In comparison, BIPC has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $151.51, while BIPC trades at $42.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.17, whereas BIPC's P/E ratio is -20.71. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BIPC's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is more volatile compared to BIPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.
ATO vs UGIC Comparison
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 24.1B. In comparison, UGIC has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $151.51, while UGIC trades at $57.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.17, whereas UGIC's P/E ratio is 8.22. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UGIC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is more volatile compared to UGIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.
ATO vs NJR Comparison
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 24.1B. In comparison, NJR has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $151.51, while NJR trades at $45.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.17, whereas NJR's P/E ratio is 10.94. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NJR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is more volatile compared to NJR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.
ATO vs SR-PA Comparison
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 24.1B. In comparison, SR-PA has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $151.51, while SR-PA trades at $23.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.17, whereas SR-PA's P/E ratio is 5.90. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SR-PA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is more volatile compared to SR-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.
ATO vs OGS Comparison
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 24.1B. In comparison, OGS has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $151.51, while OGS trades at $72.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.17, whereas OGS's P/E ratio is 17.47. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OGS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is more volatile compared to OGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.
ATO vs SR Comparison
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 24.1B. In comparison, SR has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $151.51, while SR trades at $73.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.17, whereas SR's P/E ratio is 18.78. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is more volatile compared to SR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.
ATO vs PCG-PI Comparison
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 24.1B. In comparison, PCG-PI has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $151.51, while PCG-PI trades at $15.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.17, whereas PCG-PI's P/E ratio is 2.42. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PCG-PI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is more volatile compared to PCG-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.
ATO vs CPK Comparison
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 24.1B. In comparison, CPK has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $151.51, while CPK trades at $121.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.17, whereas CPK's P/E ratio is 22.61. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CPK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is less volatile compared to CPK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.
ATO vs CTRI Comparison
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 24.1B. In comparison, CTRI has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $151.51, while CTRI trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.17, whereas CTRI's P/E ratio is 2198.50. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CTRI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is more volatile compared to CTRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.
ATO vs NWN Comparison
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 24.1B. In comparison, NWN has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $151.51, while NWN trades at $40.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.17, whereas NWN's P/E ratio is 16.17. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NWN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is more volatile compared to NWN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.
ATO vs SPH Comparison
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 24.1B. In comparison, SPH has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $151.51, while SPH trades at $18.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.17, whereas SPH's P/E ratio is 12.62. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SPH's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is less volatile compared to SPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.
ATO vs NFE Comparison
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 24.1B. In comparison, NFE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $151.51, while NFE trades at $3.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.17, whereas NFE's P/E ratio is -1.74. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NFE's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is less volatile compared to NFE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.
ATO vs OPALW Comparison
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 24.1B. In comparison, OPALW has a market cap of 634.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $151.51, while OPALW trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.17, whereas OPALW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OPALW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is less volatile compared to OPALW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.
ATO vs RGCO Comparison
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 24.1B. In comparison, RGCO has a market cap of 235M. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $151.51, while RGCO trades at $22.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.17, whereas RGCO's P/E ratio is 17.80. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RGCO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is less volatile compared to RGCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.
ATO vs OPAL Comparison
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 24.1B. In comparison, OPAL has a market cap of 75.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $151.51, while OPAL trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.17, whereas OPAL's P/E ratio is 129.75. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OPAL's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is less volatile compared to OPAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.
ATO vs MIC Comparison
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 24.1B. In comparison, MIC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $151.51, while MIC trades at $4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.17, whereas MIC's P/E ratio is 0.13. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MIC's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is more volatile compared to MIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.