Atmos Energy Corporation
Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ATO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Regulated Gas Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATO | $188.94 | +1.86% | 31.3B | 24.67 | $7.66 | +1.98% |
| NI | $47.49 | +1.26% | 22.7B | 24.35 | $1.95 | +2.40% |
| SR-PA | $123.51 | +1.84% | 20.6B | 30.54 | $4.04 | +3.48% |
| NIMC | $99.69 | -1.60% | 10.8B | 64.69 | $1.54 | +7.77% |
| NI-PB | $25.00 | +0.04% | 10.3B | 16.22 | $1.54 | +2.40% |
| UGI | $36.77 | +1.94% | 7.9B | 13.67 | $2.69 | +4.08% |
| SWX | $89.24 | +1.98% | 6.4B | 27.46 | $3.25 | +2.78% |
| NJR | $55.96 | +1.76% | 5.6B | 17.33 | $3.23 | +3.35% |
| OGS | $88.90 | +2.70% | 5.6B | 20.34 | $4.37 | +3.03% |
| SR | $92.65 | +1.87% | 5.5B | 20.27 | $4.57 | +3.48% |
Stock Comparison
ATO vs NI Comparison April 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 31.3B. In comparison, NI has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $188.94, while NI trades at $47.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.67, whereas NI's P/E ratio is 24.35. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is more volatile compared to NI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check NI's competition here
ATO vs SR-PA Comparison April 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 31.3B. In comparison, SR-PA has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $188.94, while SR-PA trades at $123.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.67, whereas SR-PA's P/E ratio is 30.54. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SR-PA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is less volatile compared to SR-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check SR-PA's competition here
ATO vs NIMC Comparison April 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 31.3B. In comparison, NIMC has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $188.94, while NIMC trades at $99.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.67, whereas NIMC's P/E ratio is 64.69. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NIMC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is more volatile compared to NIMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check NIMC's competition here
ATO vs NI-PB Comparison April 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 31.3B. In comparison, NI-PB has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $188.94, while NI-PB trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.67, whereas NI-PB's P/E ratio is 16.22. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NI-PB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is more volatile compared to NI-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check NI-PB's competition here
ATO vs UGI Comparison April 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 31.3B. In comparison, UGI has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $188.94, while UGI trades at $36.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.67, whereas UGI's P/E ratio is 13.67. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UGI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is less volatile compared to UGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check UGI's competition here
ATO vs SWX Comparison April 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 31.3B. In comparison, SWX has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $188.94, while SWX trades at $89.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.67, whereas SWX's P/E ratio is 27.46. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SWX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO and SWX have similar daily volatility (2.03).Check SWX's competition here
ATO vs NJR Comparison April 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 31.3B. In comparison, NJR has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $188.94, while NJR trades at $55.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.67, whereas NJR's P/E ratio is 17.33. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NJR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is more volatile compared to NJR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check NJR's competition here
ATO vs OGS Comparison April 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 31.3B. In comparison, OGS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $188.94, while OGS trades at $88.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.67, whereas OGS's P/E ratio is 20.34. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OGS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is less volatile compared to OGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check OGS's competition here
ATO vs SR Comparison April 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 31.3B. In comparison, SR has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $188.94, while SR trades at $92.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.67, whereas SR's P/E ratio is 20.27. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is less volatile compared to SR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check SR's competition here
ATO vs UGIC Comparison April 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 31.3B. In comparison, UGIC has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $188.94, while UGIC trades at $57.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.67, whereas UGIC's P/E ratio is 8.22. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UGIC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is less volatile compared to UGIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check UGIC's competition here
ATO vs BIPC Comparison April 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 31.3B. In comparison, BIPC has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $188.94, while BIPC trades at $40.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.67, whereas BIPC's P/E ratio is -19.99. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BIPC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is less volatile compared to BIPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check BIPC's competition here
ATO vs PCG-PI Comparison April 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 31.3B. In comparison, PCG-PI has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $188.94, while PCG-PI trades at $16.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.67, whereas PCG-PI's P/E ratio is 2.67. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PCG-PI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is more volatile compared to PCG-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check PCG-PI's competition here
ATO vs CPK Comparison April 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 31.3B. In comparison, CPK has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $188.94, while CPK trades at $129.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.67, whereas CPK's P/E ratio is 21.72. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CPK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is more volatile compared to CPK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check CPK's competition here
ATO vs CTRI Comparison April 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 31.3B. In comparison, CTRI has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $188.94, while CTRI trades at $29.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.67, whereas CTRI's P/E ratio is 119.32. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CTRI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is less volatile compared to CTRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check CTRI's competition here
ATO vs NWN Comparison April 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 31.3B. In comparison, NWN has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $188.94, while NWN trades at $54.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.67, whereas NWN's P/E ratio is 19.73. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NWN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is more volatile compared to NWN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check NWN's competition here
ATO vs SPH Comparison April 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 31.3B. In comparison, SPH has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $188.94, while SPH trades at $19.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.67, whereas SPH's P/E ratio is 9.76. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SPH's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is less volatile compared to SPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check SPH's competition here
ATO vs OPALW Comparison April 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 31.3B. In comparison, OPALW has a market cap of 634.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $188.94, while OPALW trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.67, whereas OPALW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OPALW's ROE of +2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is less volatile compared to OPALW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check OPALW's competition here
ATO vs RGCO Comparison April 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 31.3B. In comparison, RGCO has a market cap of 225.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $188.94, while RGCO trades at $21.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.67, whereas RGCO's P/E ratio is 17.38. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RGCO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is more volatile compared to RGCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check RGCO's competition here
ATO vs SRJN Comparison April 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 31.3B. In comparison, SRJN has a market cap of 194.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $188.94, while SRJN trades at $24.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.67, whereas SRJN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SRJN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is more volatile compared to SRJN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check SRJN's competition here
ATO vs NFE Comparison April 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 31.3B. In comparison, NFE has a market cap of 162.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $188.94, while NFE trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.67, whereas NFE's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NFE's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is less volatile compared to NFE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check NFE's competition here
ATO vs OPAL Comparison April 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 31.3B. In comparison, OPAL has a market cap of 69.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $188.94, while OPAL trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.67, whereas OPAL's P/E ratio is 15.93. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OPAL's ROE of +2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is less volatile compared to OPAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check OPAL's competition here
ATO vs MIC Comparison April 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 31.3B. In comparison, MIC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $188.94, while MIC trades at $4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.67, whereas MIC's P/E ratio is 0.13. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MIC's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is more volatile compared to MIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check MIC's competition here
ATO vs ADGE Comparison April 2026
ATO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATO stands at 31.3B. In comparison, ADGE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ATO is priced at $188.94, while ADGE trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.67, whereas ADGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ADGE's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ATO is less volatile compared to ADGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATO.Check ADGE's competition here