Altisource Portfolio Solutions S.A.
Altisource Portfolio Solutions S.A. ASPS Peers
See (ASPS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Real Estate - Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASPS | $13.68 | +1.33% | 152.1M | -1.69 | -$8.08 | N/A |
| DUO | $2.42 | +2.11% | 66.6B | 0.31 | $7.70 | N/A |
| CBRE | $141.21 | +1.04% | 42.1B | 43.15 | $3.27 | N/A |
| CSGP | $86.05 | +1.83% | 36.3B | 307.32 | $0.28 | N/A |
| JLL | $259.69 | +1.72% | 12.3B | 23.44 | $11.08 | N/A |
| FSV | $178.72 | +0.57% | 8.1B | 61.57 | $2.90 | +0.59% |
| BEKE | $19.45 | +6.52% | 7.4B | 36.69 | $0.53 | +1.85% |
| CIGI | $134.73 | +1.88% | 6.6B | 46.73 | $2.88 | +0.22% |
| BPYPP | $14.90 | -0.86% | 5.5B | 6.79 | $2.20 | +13.44% |
| BPYPO | $14.85 | -0.00% | 5.5B | 6.76 | $2.20 | +13.44% |
Stock Comparison
ASPS vs DUO Comparison
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, DUO has a market cap of 66.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $13.68, while DUO trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas DUO's P/E ratio is 0.31. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DUO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is less volatile compared to DUO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.
ASPS vs CBRE Comparison
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, CBRE has a market cap of 42.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $13.68, while CBRE trades at $141.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas CBRE's P/E ratio is 43.15. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CBRE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to CBRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.
ASPS vs CSGP Comparison
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, CSGP has a market cap of 36.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $13.68, while CSGP trades at $86.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas CSGP's P/E ratio is 307.32. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CSGP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to CSGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.
ASPS vs JLL Comparison
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, JLL has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $13.68, while JLL trades at $259.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas JLL's P/E ratio is 23.44. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to JLL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to JLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.
ASPS vs FSV Comparison
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, FSV has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $13.68, while FSV trades at $178.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas FSV's P/E ratio is 61.57. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FSV's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to FSV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.
ASPS vs BEKE Comparison
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, BEKE has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $13.68, while BEKE trades at $19.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas BEKE's P/E ratio is 36.69. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BEKE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to BEKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.
ASPS vs CIGI Comparison
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, CIGI has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $13.68, while CIGI trades at $134.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas CIGI's P/E ratio is 46.73. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CIGI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to CIGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.
ASPS vs BPYPP Comparison
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, BPYPP has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $13.68, while BPYPP trades at $14.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas BPYPP's P/E ratio is 6.79. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BPYPP's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to BPYPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.
ASPS vs BPYPO Comparison
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, BPYPO has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $13.68, while BPYPO trades at $14.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas BPYPO's P/E ratio is 6.76. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BPYPO's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to BPYPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.
ASPS vs BPYPN Comparison
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, BPYPN has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $13.68, while BPYPN trades at $13.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas BPYPN's P/E ratio is 6.14. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BPYPN's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to BPYPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.
ASPS vs TCN Comparison
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, TCN has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $13.68, while TCN trades at $11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas TCN's P/E ratio is 27.44. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TCN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to TCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.
ASPS vs CWK Comparison
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, CWK has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $13.68, while CWK trades at $11.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas CWK's P/E ratio is 16.93. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CWK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to CWK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.
ASPS vs NMRK Comparison
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, NMRK has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $13.68, while NMRK trades at $12.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas NMRK's P/E ratio is 33.25. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NMRK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to NMRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.
ASPS vs EXPI Comparison
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, EXPI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $13.68, while EXPI trades at $10.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas EXPI's P/E ratio is -116.50. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to EXPI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to EXPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.
ASPS vs RDFN Comparison
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, RDFN has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $13.68, while RDFN trades at $11.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas RDFN's P/E ratio is -7.36. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RDFN's ROE of +2.74%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to RDFN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.
ASPS vs RLGY Comparison
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, RLGY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $13.68, while RLGY trades at $12.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas RLGY's P/E ratio is 4.59. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RLGY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to RLGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.
ASPS vs MMI Comparison
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, MMI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $13.68, while MMI trades at $31.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas MMI's P/E ratio is -188.47. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MMI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to MMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.
ASPS vs PGRU Comparison
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, PGRU has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $13.68, while PGRU trades at $6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas PGRU's P/E ratio is -67.00. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PGRU's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to PGRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.
ASPS vs KW Comparison
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, KW has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $13.68, while KW trades at $7.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas KW's P/E ratio is -7.40. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KW's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to KW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.
ASPS vs REAX Comparison
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, REAX has a market cap of 878.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $13.68, while REAX trades at $4.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas REAX's P/E ratio is -60.86. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to REAX's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to REAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.
ASPS vs INDT Comparison
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, INDT has a market cap of 683.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $13.68, while INDT trades at $66.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas INDT's P/E ratio is -209.34. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to INDT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to INDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.
ASPS vs OPEN Comparison
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, OPEN has a market cap of 640.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $13.68, while OPEN trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas OPEN's P/E ratio is -1.69. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to OPEN's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is less volatile compared to OPEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.
ASPS vs QK Comparison
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, QK has a market cap of 636.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $13.68, while QK trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas QK's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to QK's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is less volatile compared to QK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.
ASPS vs RMR Comparison
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, RMR has a market cap of 560.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $13.68, while RMR trades at $17.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas RMR's P/E ratio is 14.65. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RMR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to RMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.
ASPS vs FRPH Comparison
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, FRPH has a market cap of 516.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $13.68, while FRPH trades at $27.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas FRPH's P/E ratio is 75.17. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FRPH's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to FRPH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.
ASPS vs HOUS Comparison
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, HOUS has a market cap of 456.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $13.68, while HOUS trades at $4.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas HOUS's P/E ratio is -4.35. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HOUS's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to HOUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.
ASPS vs LRHC Comparison
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, LRHC has a market cap of 452.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $13.68, while LRHC trades at $7.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas LRHC's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LRHC's ROE of +5.61%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to LRHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.
ASPS vs TCI Comparison
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, TCI has a market cap of 378.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $13.68, while TCI trades at $43.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas TCI's P/E ratio is 48.13. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TCI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to TCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.
ASPS vs MLP Comparison
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, MLP has a market cap of 359.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $13.68, while MLP trades at $18.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas MLP's P/E ratio is -24.31. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MLP's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to MLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.
ASPS vs RMAX Comparison
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, RMAX has a market cap of 336.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $13.68, while RMAX trades at $8.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas RMAX's P/E ratio is 18.78. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RMAX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to RMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.
ASPS vs SEG Comparison
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, SEG has a market cap of 278.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $13.68, while SEG trades at $21.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas SEG's P/E ratio is -1.98. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SEG's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to SEG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.
ASPS vs NEN Comparison
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, NEN has a market cap of 259M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $13.68, while NEN trades at $74.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas NEN's P/E ratio is 16.37. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NEN's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to NEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.
ASPS vs FLJ Comparison
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, FLJ has a market cap of 258M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $13.68, while FLJ trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas FLJ's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FLJ's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is less volatile compared to FLJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.
ASPS vs CIAN Comparison
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, CIAN has a market cap of 237.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $13.68, while CIAN trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas CIAN's P/E ratio is -4.86. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CIAN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is less volatile compared to CIAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.
ASPS vs OPAD-WT Comparison
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, OPAD-WT has a market cap of 234.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $13.68, while OPAD-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas OPAD-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to OPAD-WT's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is less volatile compared to OPAD-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.
ASPS vs DOUG Comparison
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, DOUG has a market cap of 223.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $13.68, while DOUG trades at $2.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas DOUG's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DOUG's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to DOUG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.
ASPS vs LODE Comparison
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, LODE has a market cap of 116.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $13.68, while LODE trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas LODE's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LODE's ROE of -138743.50%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to LODE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.
ASPS vs STHO Comparison
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, STHO has a market cap of 109.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $13.68, while STHO trades at $8.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas STHO's P/E ratio is -2.41. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to STHO's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to STHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.
ASPS vs RFL Comparison
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, RFL has a market cap of 107.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $13.68, while RFL trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas RFL's P/E ratio is -2.34. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RFL's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is less volatile compared to RFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.
ASPS vs DOMA Comparison
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, DOMA has a market cap of 89.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $13.68, while DOMA trades at $6.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas DOMA's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DOMA's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to DOMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.
ASPS vs MAYS Comparison
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, MAYS has a market cap of 80.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $13.68, while MAYS trades at $40.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas MAYS's P/E ratio is -1333.33. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MAYS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to MAYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.
ASPS vs WE Comparison
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, WE has a market cap of 44.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $13.68, while WE trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas WE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to WE's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is less volatile compared to WE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.
ASPS vs LGPS Comparison
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, LGPS has a market cap of 41.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $13.68, while LGPS trades at $1.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas LGPS's P/E ratio is 9.24. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LGPS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is less volatile compared to LGPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.
ASPS vs OPAD Comparison
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, OPAD has a market cap of 39.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $13.68, while OPAD trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas OPAD's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to OPAD's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to OPAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.
ASPS vs FTHM Comparison
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, FTHM has a market cap of 36.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $13.68, while FTHM trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas FTHM's P/E ratio is -1.31. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FTHM's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to FTHM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.
ASPS vs CHG Comparison
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, CHG has a market cap of 35.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $13.68, while CHG trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas CHG's P/E ratio is 43.33. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CHG's ROE of +3.50%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to CHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.
ASPS vs OMH Comparison
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, OMH has a market cap of 34.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $13.68, while OMH trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas OMH's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to OMH's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to OMH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.
ASPS vs GYRO Comparison
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, GYRO has a market cap of 18.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $13.68, while GYRO trades at $8.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas GYRO's P/E ratio is 47.81. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GYRO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to GYRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.
ASPS vs LEJU Comparison
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, LEJU has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $13.68, while LEJU trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas LEJU's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LEJU's ROE of -2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to LEJU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.
ASPS vs AIRE Comparison
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, AIRE has a market cap of 13.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $13.68, while AIRE trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas AIRE's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AIRE's ROE of -2.42%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to AIRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.
ASPS vs WETH Comparison
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, WETH has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $13.68, while WETH trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas WETH's P/E ratio is 3.67. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to WETH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to WETH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.
ASPS vs ALBT Comparison
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, ALBT has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $13.68, while ALBT trades at $2.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas ALBT's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ALBT's ROE of -2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to ALBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.
ASPS vs GBR Comparison
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, GBR has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $13.68, while GBR trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas GBR's P/E ratio is -36.00. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GBR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to GBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.
ASPS vs AVCO Comparison
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, AVCO has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $13.68, while AVCO trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas AVCO's P/E ratio is -5.16. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AVCO's ROE of -2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is less volatile compared to AVCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.
ASPS vs UOKA Comparison
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, UOKA has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $13.68, while UOKA trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas UOKA's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to UOKA's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to UOKA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.
ASPS vs MDJH Comparison
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, MDJH has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $13.68, while MDJH trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas MDJH's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MDJH's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to MDJH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.
ASPS vs UK Comparison
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, UK has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $13.68, while UK trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas UK's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to UK's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to UK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.
ASPS vs SFR Comparison
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, SFR has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $13.68, while SFR trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas SFR's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SFR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is less volatile compared to SFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.
ASPS vs SFRWW Comparison
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, SFRWW has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $13.68, while SFRWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas SFRWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SFRWW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is less volatile compared to SFRWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.
ASPS vs UKOMW Comparison
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, UKOMW has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $13.68, while UKOMW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas UKOMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to UKOMW's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to UKOMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.
ASPS vs XHG Comparison
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, XHG has a market cap of 5.6K. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $13.68, while XHG trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas XHG's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XHG's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to XHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.
ASPS vs NTP Comparison
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, NTP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $13.68, while NTP trades at $4.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas NTP's P/E ratio is 3.40. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NTP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to NTP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.
ASPS vs LMRKN Comparison
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, LMRKN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $13.68, while LMRKN trades at $25.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas LMRKN's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LMRKN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to LMRKN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.
ASPS vs IRCP Comparison
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, IRCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $13.68, while IRCP trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas IRCP's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to IRCP's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to IRCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.
ASPS vs OBAS Comparison
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, OBAS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $13.68, while OBAS trades at $12.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas OBAS's P/E ratio is -31.48. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to OBAS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to OBAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.
ASPS vs LMRKO Comparison
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, LMRKO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $13.68, while LMRKO trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas LMRKO's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LMRKO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to LMRKO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.
ASPS vs LMRK Comparison
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, LMRK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $13.68, while LMRK trades at $16.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas LMRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LMRK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to LMRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.
ASPS vs BPY Comparison
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, BPY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $13.68, while BPY trades at $18.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas BPY's P/E ratio is -11.28. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BPY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to BPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.
ASPS vs LMRKP Comparison
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, LMRKP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $13.68, while LMRKP trades at $25.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.69, whereas LMRKP's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LMRKP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to LMRKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.