Altisource Portfolio Solutions S.A.
Altisource Portfolio Solutions S.A. (ASPS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ASPS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Real Estate - Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASPS | $11.32 | +1.80% | 128.3M | -3.02 | -$3.87 | N/A |
| CBRE | $153.94 | -1.16% | 45.8B | 43.21 | $3.56 | N/A |
| CSGP | $94.60 | -0.62% | 40.1B | 363.85 | $0.26 | N/A |
| JLL | $265.35 | -1.85% | 12.6B | 24.00 | $11.06 | N/A |
| FSV | $195.80 | -0.72% | 8.9B | 62.96 | $3.11 | +0.54% |
| CIGI | $150.83 | +0.08% | 7.4B | 67.64 | $2.23 | +0.20% |
| BEKE | $18.20 | -1.22% | 6.9B | 34.34 | $0.53 | +1.98% |
| BPYPP | $14.56 | +0.76% | 5.4B | 6.63 | $2.20 | +11.18% |
| BPYPO | $14.38 | +1.05% | 5.2B | 6.49 | $2.20 | +11.18% |
| BPYPN | $13.02 | +0.31% | 4.8B | 5.93 | $2.20 | +11.18% |
Stock Comparison
ASPS vs CBRE Comparison August 2025
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 128.3M. In comparison, CBRE has a market cap of 45.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $11.32, while CBRE trades at $153.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.02, whereas CBRE's P/E ratio is 43.21. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CBRE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to CBRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.Check CBRE's competition here
ASPS vs CSGP Comparison August 2025
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 128.3M. In comparison, CSGP has a market cap of 40.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $11.32, while CSGP trades at $94.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.02, whereas CSGP's P/E ratio is 363.85. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CSGP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to CSGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.Check CSGP's competition here
ASPS vs JLL Comparison August 2025
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 128.3M. In comparison, JLL has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $11.32, while JLL trades at $265.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.02, whereas JLL's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JLL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to JLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.Check JLL's competition here
ASPS vs FSV Comparison August 2025
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 128.3M. In comparison, FSV has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $11.32, while FSV trades at $195.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.02, whereas FSV's P/E ratio is 62.96. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FSV's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to FSV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.Check FSV's competition here
ASPS vs CIGI Comparison August 2025
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 128.3M. In comparison, CIGI has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $11.32, while CIGI trades at $150.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.02, whereas CIGI's P/E ratio is 67.64. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CIGI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to CIGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.Check CIGI's competition here
ASPS vs BEKE Comparison August 2025
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 128.3M. In comparison, BEKE has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $11.32, while BEKE trades at $18.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.02, whereas BEKE's P/E ratio is 34.34. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BEKE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to BEKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.Check BEKE's competition here
ASPS vs BPYPP Comparison August 2025
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 128.3M. In comparison, BPYPP has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $11.32, while BPYPP trades at $14.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.02, whereas BPYPP's P/E ratio is 6.63. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BPYPP's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to BPYPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.Check BPYPP's competition here
ASPS vs BPYPO Comparison August 2025
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 128.3M. In comparison, BPYPO has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $11.32, while BPYPO trades at $14.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.02, whereas BPYPO's P/E ratio is 6.49. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BPYPO's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to BPYPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.Check BPYPO's competition here
ASPS vs BPYPN Comparison August 2025
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 128.3M. In comparison, BPYPN has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $11.32, while BPYPN trades at $13.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.02, whereas BPYPN's P/E ratio is 5.93. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BPYPN's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to BPYPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.Check BPYPN's competition here
ASPS vs TCN Comparison August 2025
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 128.3M. In comparison, TCN has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $11.32, while TCN trades at $11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.02, whereas TCN's P/E ratio is 27.44. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TCN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to TCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.Check TCN's competition here
ASPS vs NMRK Comparison August 2025
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 128.3M. In comparison, NMRK has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $11.32, while NMRK trades at $15.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.02, whereas NMRK's P/E ratio is 36.88. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NMRK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to NMRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.Check NMRK's competition here
ASPS vs CWK Comparison August 2025
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 128.3M. In comparison, CWK has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $11.32, while CWK trades at $11.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.02, whereas CWK's P/E ratio is 17.04. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CWK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to CWK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.Check CWK's competition here
ASPS vs OPEN Comparison August 2025
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 128.3M. In comparison, OPEN has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $11.32, while OPEN trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.02, whereas OPEN's P/E ratio is -4.04. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OPEN's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is less volatile compared to OPEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.Check OPEN's competition here
ASPS vs EXPI Comparison August 2025
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 128.3M. In comparison, EXPI has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $11.32, while EXPI trades at $9.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.02, whereas EXPI's P/E ratio is -49.58. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EXPI's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is less volatile compared to EXPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.Check EXPI's competition here
ASPS vs RDFN Comparison August 2025
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 128.3M. In comparison, RDFN has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $11.32, while RDFN trades at $11.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.02, whereas RDFN's P/E ratio is -7.36. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RDFN's ROE of +2.74%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to RDFN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.Check RDFN's competition here
ASPS vs RLGY Comparison August 2025
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 128.3M. In comparison, RLGY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $11.32, while RLGY trades at $12.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.02, whereas RLGY's P/E ratio is 4.59. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RLGY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to RLGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.Check RLGY's competition here
ASPS vs MMI Comparison August 2025
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 128.3M. In comparison, MMI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $11.32, while MMI trades at $30.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.02, whereas MMI's P/E ratio is -180.38. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MMI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to MMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.Check MMI's competition here
ASPS vs PGRU Comparison August 2025
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 128.3M. In comparison, PGRU has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $11.32, while PGRU trades at $6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.02, whereas PGRU's P/E ratio is -67.00. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PGRU's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to PGRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.Check PGRU's competition here
ASPS vs KW Comparison August 2025
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 128.3M. In comparison, KW has a market cap of 999.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $11.32, while KW trades at $7.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.02, whereas KW's P/E ratio is -6.88. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KW's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to KW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.Check KW's competition here
ASPS vs REAX Comparison August 2025
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 128.3M. In comparison, REAX has a market cap of 800.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $11.32, while REAX trades at $3.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.02, whereas REAX's P/E ratio is -55.43. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to REAX's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to REAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.Check REAX's competition here
ASPS vs INDT Comparison August 2025
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 128.3M. In comparison, INDT has a market cap of 683.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $11.32, while INDT trades at $66.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.02, whereas INDT's P/E ratio is -209.34. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to INDT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to INDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.Check INDT's competition here
ASPS vs QK Comparison August 2025
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 128.3M. In comparison, QK has a market cap of 636.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $11.32, while QK trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.02, whereas QK's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to QK's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is less volatile compared to QK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.Check QK's competition here
ASPS vs RMR Comparison August 2025
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 128.3M. In comparison, RMR has a market cap of 502.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $11.32, while RMR trades at $15.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.02, whereas RMR's P/E ratio is 13.13. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RMR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to RMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.Check RMR's competition here
ASPS vs HOUS Comparison August 2025
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 128.3M. In comparison, HOUS has a market cap of 501.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $11.32, while HOUS trades at $4.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.02, whereas HOUS's P/E ratio is -4.62. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HOUS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to HOUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.Check HOUS's competition here
ASPS vs FRPH Comparison August 2025
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 128.3M. In comparison, FRPH has a market cap of 495.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $11.32, while FRPH trades at $25.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.02, whereas FRPH's P/E ratio is 72.08. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FRPH's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to FRPH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.Check FRPH's competition here
ASPS vs TCI Comparison August 2025
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 128.3M. In comparison, TCI has a market cap of 345.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $11.32, while TCI trades at $39.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.02, whereas TCI's P/E ratio is 43.90. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TCI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to TCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.Check TCI's competition here
ASPS vs MLP Comparison August 2025
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 128.3M. In comparison, MLP has a market cap of 324M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $11.32, while MLP trades at $16.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.02, whereas MLP's P/E ratio is -21.88. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MLP's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to MLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.Check MLP's competition here
ASPS vs SEG Comparison August 2025
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 128.3M. In comparison, SEG has a market cap of 286.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $11.32, while SEG trades at $22.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.02, whereas SEG's P/E ratio is -2.03. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SEG's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to SEG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.Check SEG's competition here
ASPS vs FLJ Comparison August 2025
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 128.3M. In comparison, FLJ has a market cap of 258M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $11.32, while FLJ trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.02, whereas FLJ's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FLJ's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is less volatile compared to FLJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.Check FLJ's competition here
ASPS vs NEN Comparison August 2025
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 128.3M. In comparison, NEN has a market cap of 253.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $11.32, while NEN trades at $72.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.02, whereas NEN's P/E ratio is 16.04. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NEN's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to NEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.Check NEN's competition here
ASPS vs CIAN Comparison August 2025
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 128.3M. In comparison, CIAN has a market cap of 237.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $11.32, while CIAN trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.02, whereas CIAN's P/E ratio is -4.86. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CIAN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is less volatile compared to CIAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.Check CIAN's competition here
ASPS vs OPAD-WT Comparison August 2025
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 128.3M. In comparison, OPAD-WT has a market cap of 234.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $11.32, while OPAD-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.02, whereas OPAD-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OPAD-WT's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is less volatile compared to OPAD-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.Check OPAD-WT's competition here
ASPS vs DOUG Comparison August 2025
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 128.3M. In comparison, DOUG has a market cap of 189.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $11.32, while DOUG trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.02, whereas DOUG's P/E ratio is -4.45. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DOUG's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is less volatile compared to DOUG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.Check DOUG's competition here
ASPS vs RMAX Comparison August 2025
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 128.3M. In comparison, RMAX has a market cap of 151M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $11.32, while RMAX trades at $7.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.02, whereas RMAX's P/E ratio is 15.39. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RMAX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to RMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.Check RMAX's competition here
ASPS vs LODE Comparison August 2025
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 128.3M. In comparison, LODE has a market cap of 102.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $11.32, while LODE trades at $3.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.02, whereas LODE's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LODE's ROE of -138743.50%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to LODE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.Check LODE's competition here
ASPS vs STHO Comparison August 2025
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 128.3M. In comparison, STHO has a market cap of 97.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $11.32, while STHO trades at $7.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.02, whereas STHO's P/E ratio is -2.14. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STHO's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to STHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.Check STHO's competition here
ASPS vs DOMA Comparison August 2025
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 128.3M. In comparison, DOMA has a market cap of 89.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $11.32, while DOMA trades at $6.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.02, whereas DOMA's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DOMA's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to DOMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.Check DOMA's competition here
ASPS vs MAYS Comparison August 2025
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 128.3M. In comparison, MAYS has a market cap of 80.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $11.32, while MAYS trades at $40.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.02, whereas MAYS's P/E ratio is -1333.33. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MAYS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to MAYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.Check MAYS's competition here
ASPS vs RFL Comparison August 2025
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 128.3M. In comparison, RFL has a market cap of 60.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $11.32, while RFL trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.02, whereas RFL's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RFL's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is less volatile compared to RFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.Check RFL's competition here
ASPS vs WE Comparison August 2025
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 128.3M. In comparison, WE has a market cap of 44.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $11.32, while WE trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.02, whereas WE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WE's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is less volatile compared to WE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.Check WE's competition here
ASPS vs OPAD Comparison August 2025
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 128.3M. In comparison, OPAD has a market cap of 37.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $11.32, while OPAD trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.02, whereas OPAD's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OPAD's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is less volatile compared to OPAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.Check OPAD's competition here
ASPS vs CHG Comparison August 2025
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 128.3M. In comparison, CHG has a market cap of 35.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $11.32, while CHG trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.02, whereas CHG's P/E ratio is 43.33. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CHG's ROE of +3.50%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to CHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.Check CHG's competition here
ASPS vs FTHM Comparison August 2025
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 128.3M. In comparison, FTHM has a market cap of 32.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $11.32, while FTHM trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.02, whereas FTHM's P/E ratio is -1.14. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FTHM's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is less volatile compared to FTHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.Check FTHM's competition here
ASPS vs AIRE Comparison August 2025
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 128.3M. In comparison, AIRE has a market cap of 30.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $11.32, while AIRE trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.02, whereas AIRE's P/E ratio is -1.85. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AIRE's ROE of -2.42%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is less volatile compared to AIRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.Check AIRE's competition here
ASPS vs OMH Comparison August 2025
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 128.3M. In comparison, OMH has a market cap of 23.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $11.32, while OMH trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.02, whereas OMH's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OMH's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to OMH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.Check OMH's competition here
ASPS vs LGPS Comparison August 2025
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 128.3M. In comparison, LGPS has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $11.32, while LGPS trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.02, whereas LGPS's P/E ratio is 3.74. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LGPS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is less volatile compared to LGPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.Check LGPS's competition here
ASPS vs GYRO Comparison August 2025
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 128.3M. In comparison, GYRO has a market cap of 20.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $11.32, while GYRO trades at $9.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.02, whereas GYRO's P/E ratio is 48.42. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GYRO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to GYRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.Check GYRO's competition here
ASPS vs LEJU Comparison August 2025
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 128.3M. In comparison, LEJU has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $11.32, while LEJU trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.02, whereas LEJU's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LEJU's ROE of -2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to LEJU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.Check LEJU's competition here
ASPS vs DUO Comparison August 2025
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 128.3M. In comparison, DUO has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $11.32, while DUO trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.02, whereas DUO's P/E ratio is 0.23. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DUO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is less volatile compared to DUO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.Check DUO's competition here
ASPS vs WETH Comparison August 2025
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 128.3M. In comparison, WETH has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $11.32, while WETH trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.02, whereas WETH's P/E ratio is 3.11. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WETH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to WETH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.Check WETH's competition here
ASPS vs ALBT Comparison August 2025
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 128.3M. In comparison, ALBT has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $11.32, while ALBT trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.02, whereas ALBT's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ALBT's ROE of -2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is less volatile compared to ALBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.Check ALBT's competition here
ASPS vs AVCO Comparison August 2025
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 128.3M. In comparison, AVCO has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $11.32, while AVCO trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.02, whereas AVCO's P/E ratio is -5.16. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AVCO's ROE of -2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is less volatile compared to AVCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.Check AVCO's competition here
ASPS vs GBR Comparison August 2025
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 128.3M. In comparison, GBR has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $11.32, while GBR trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.02, whereas GBR's P/E ratio is -28.00. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GBR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is less volatile compared to GBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.Check GBR's competition here
ASPS vs LRHC Comparison August 2025
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 128.3M. In comparison, LRHC has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $11.32, while LRHC trades at $4.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.02, whereas LRHC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LRHC's ROE of +5.61%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to LRHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.Check LRHC's competition here
ASPS vs UOKA Comparison August 2025
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 128.3M. In comparison, UOKA has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $11.32, while UOKA trades at $2.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.02, whereas UOKA's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UOKA's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to UOKA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.Check UOKA's competition here
ASPS vs MDJH Comparison August 2025
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 128.3M. In comparison, MDJH has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $11.32, while MDJH trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.02, whereas MDJH's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MDJH's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to MDJH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.Check MDJH's competition here
ASPS vs UK Comparison August 2025
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 128.3M. In comparison, UK has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $11.32, while UK trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.02, whereas UK's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UK's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to UK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.Check UK's competition here
ASPS vs SFR Comparison August 2025
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 128.3M. In comparison, SFR has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $11.32, while SFR trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.02, whereas SFR's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SFR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is less volatile compared to SFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.Check SFR's competition here
ASPS vs SFRWW Comparison August 2025
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 128.3M. In comparison, SFRWW has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $11.32, while SFRWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.02, whereas SFRWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SFRWW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is less volatile compared to SFRWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.Check SFRWW's competition here
ASPS vs UKOMW Comparison August 2025
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 128.3M. In comparison, UKOMW has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $11.32, while UKOMW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.02, whereas UKOMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UKOMW's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to UKOMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.Check UKOMW's competition here
ASPS vs XHG Comparison August 2025
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 128.3M. In comparison, XHG has a market cap of 5.5K. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $11.32, while XHG trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.02, whereas XHG's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to XHG's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is less volatile compared to XHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.Check XHG's competition here
ASPS vs BPY Comparison August 2025
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 128.3M. In comparison, BPY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $11.32, while BPY trades at $18.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.02, whereas BPY's P/E ratio is -11.28. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BPY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to BPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.Check BPY's competition here
ASPS vs NTP Comparison August 2025
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 128.3M. In comparison, NTP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $11.32, while NTP trades at $4.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.02, whereas NTP's P/E ratio is 3.40. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NTP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to NTP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.Check NTP's competition here
ASPS vs OBAS Comparison August 2025
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 128.3M. In comparison, OBAS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $11.32, while OBAS trades at $12.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.02, whereas OBAS's P/E ratio is -31.48. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OBAS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to OBAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.Check OBAS's competition here
ASPS vs LMRK Comparison August 2025
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 128.3M. In comparison, LMRK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $11.32, while LMRK trades at $16.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.02, whereas LMRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LMRK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to LMRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.Check LMRK's competition here
ASPS vs LMRKO Comparison August 2025
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 128.3M. In comparison, LMRKO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $11.32, while LMRKO trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.02, whereas LMRKO's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LMRKO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to LMRKO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.Check LMRKO's competition here
ASPS vs IRCP Comparison August 2025
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 128.3M. In comparison, IRCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $11.32, while IRCP trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.02, whereas IRCP's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IRCP's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to IRCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.Check IRCP's competition here
ASPS vs LMRKP Comparison August 2025
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 128.3M. In comparison, LMRKP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $11.32, while LMRKP trades at $25.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.02, whereas LMRKP's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LMRKP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to LMRKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.Check LMRKP's competition here
ASPS vs LMRKN Comparison August 2025
ASPS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASPS stands at 128.3M. In comparison, LMRKN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ASPS is priced at $11.32, while LMRKN trades at $25.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASPS currently has a P/E ratio of -3.02, whereas LMRKN's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, ASPS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LMRKN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ASPS is more volatile compared to LMRKN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASPS.Check LMRKN's competition here