Arrival
Arrival ARVL Peers
See (ARVL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARVL | $0.49 | -33.69% | 9.00M | -0.07 | -$6.69 | N/A |
| TSLA | $349.98 | +2.09% | 1.13T | 199.99 | $1.75 | N/A |
| TM | $183.23 | -0.12% | 239.10B | 7.52 | $24.36 | +1.27% |
| RACE | $498.75 | +0.80% | 88.88B | 50.63 | $9.85 | +0.61% |
| GM | $50.38 | +0.51% | 48.43B | 7.07 | $7.13 | +0.95% |
| F-PD | $21.48 | -0.37% | 42.26B | N/A | N/A | +6.96% |
| F-PC | $20.24 | -1.20% | 42.24B | N/A | N/A | +6.96% |
| F | $10.80 | +0.47% | 42.18B | 8.64 | $1.25 | +6.96% |
| F-PB | $20.31 | -0.98% | 41.98B | N/A | N/A | +6.96% |
| STLA | $10.75 | +0.47% | 30.80B | 5.35 | $2.01 | +8.01% |
Stock Comparison
ARVL vs TSLA Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9.00M. In comparison, TSLA has a market cap of 1.13T. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while TSLA trades at $349.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas TSLA's P/E ratio is 199.99. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to TSLA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to TSLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs TM Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9.00M. In comparison, TM has a market cap of 239.10B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while TM trades at $183.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas TM's P/E ratio is 7.52. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to TM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to TM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs RACE Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9.00M. In comparison, RACE has a market cap of 88.88B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while RACE trades at $498.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas RACE's P/E ratio is 50.63. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to RACE's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to RACE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs GM Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9.00M. In comparison, GM has a market cap of 48.43B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while GM trades at $50.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas GM's P/E ratio is 7.07. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to GM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to GM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs F-PD Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9.00M. In comparison, F-PD has a market cap of 42.26B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while F-PD trades at $21.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas F-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to F-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to F-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs F-PC Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9.00M. In comparison, F-PC has a market cap of 42.24B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while F-PC trades at $20.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas F-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to F-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to F-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs F Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9.00M. In comparison, F has a market cap of 42.18B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while F trades at $10.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas F's P/E ratio is 8.64. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to F's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs F-PB Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9.00M. In comparison, F-PB has a market cap of 41.98B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while F-PB trades at $20.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas F-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to F-PB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to F-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs STLA Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9.00M. In comparison, STLA has a market cap of 30.80B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while STLA trades at $10.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas STLA's P/E ratio is 5.35. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to STLA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to STLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs XPEV Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9.00M. In comparison, XPEV has a market cap of 19.74B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while XPEV trades at $20.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas XPEV's P/E ratio is -24.29. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to XPEV's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to XPEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs RIVN Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9.00M. In comparison, RIVN has a market cap of 18.00B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while RIVN trades at $15.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas RIVN's P/E ratio is -4.28. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to RIVN's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to RIVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs LI Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9.00M. In comparison, LI has a market cap of 14.58B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while LI trades at $28.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas LI's P/E ratio is 27.45. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to LI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to LI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs HMC Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9.00M. In comparison, HMC has a market cap of 14.10B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while HMC trades at $29.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas HMC's P/E ratio is 8.06. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to HMC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to HMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs LCID Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9.00M. In comparison, LCID has a market cap of 8.66B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while LCID trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas LCID's P/E ratio is -2.39. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to LCID's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to LCID. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs NIO Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9.00M. In comparison, NIO has a market cap of 8.60B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while NIO trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas NIO's P/E ratio is -2.68. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to NIO's ROE of -1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to NIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs VFS Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9.00M. In comparison, VFS has a market cap of 8.42B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while VFS trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas VFS's P/E ratio is -2.83. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to VFS's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to VFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs ZK Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9.00M. In comparison, ZK has a market cap of 7.43B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while ZK trades at $29.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas ZK's P/E ratio is -7.75. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to ZK's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to ZK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs PSNY Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9.00M. In comparison, PSNY has a market cap of 2.47B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while PSNY trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas PSNY's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to PSNY's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to PSNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs LOT Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9.00M. In comparison, LOT has a market cap of 1.51B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while LOT trades at $2.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas LOT's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to LOT's ROE of +3.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to LOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs BLBD Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9.00M. In comparison, BLBD has a market cap of 1.29B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while BLBD trades at $40.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas BLBD's P/E ratio is 12.72. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to BLBD's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to BLBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs VFSWW Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9.00M. In comparison, VFSWW has a market cap of 736.73M. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while VFSWW trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas VFSWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to VFSWW's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to VFSWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs NAKD Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9.00M. In comparison, NAKD has a market cap of 682.01M. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while NAKD trades at $2.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas NAKD's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to NAKD's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to NAKD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs LVWR Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9.00M. In comparison, LVWR has a market cap of 235.12M. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while LVWR trades at $1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas LVWR's P/E ratio is -2.69. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to LVWR's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to LVWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs NIU Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9.00M. In comparison, NIU has a market cap of 149.30M. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while NIU trades at $3.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas NIU's P/E ratio is -11.26. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to NIU's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to NIU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs FFAI Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9.00M. In comparison, FFAI has a market cap of 112.26M. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while FFAI trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas FFAI's P/E ratio is 0.18. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to FFAI's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to FFAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs FFIE Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9.00M. In comparison, FFIE has a market cap of 105.76M. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while FFIE trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas FFIE's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to FFIE's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to FFIE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs FFIEW Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9.00M. In comparison, FFIEW has a market cap of 105.76M. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while FFIEW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas FFIEW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to FFIEW's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to FFIEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs LOTWW Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9.00M. In comparison, LOTWW has a market cap of 91.37M. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while LOTWW trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas LOTWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to LOTWW's ROE of +3.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to LOTWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs CJET Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9.00M. In comparison, CJET has a market cap of 64.70M. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while CJET trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas CJET's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to CJET's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to CJET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs FSR Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9.00M. In comparison, FSR has a market cap of 52.82M. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while FSR trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas FSR's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to FSR's ROE of -2.89%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to FSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs CENN Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9.00M. In comparison, CENN has a market cap of 30.87M. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while CENN trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas CENN's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to CENN's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to CENN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs SOLO Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9.00M. In comparison, SOLO has a market cap of 25.36M. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while SOLO trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas SOLO's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to SOLO's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to SOLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs RIDE Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9.00M. In comparison, RIDE has a market cap of 21.57M. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while RIDE trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas RIDE's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to RIDE's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to RIDE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs DMN Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9.00M. In comparison, DMN has a market cap of 18.38M. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while DMN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas DMN's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to DMN's ROE of -48.65%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to DMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs GP Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9.00M. In comparison, GP has a market cap of 13.56M. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while GP trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas GP's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to GP's ROE of -3.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to GP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs FLYE Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9.00M. In comparison, FLYE has a market cap of 11.98M. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while FLYE trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas FLYE's P/E ratio is -8.12. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to FLYE's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to FLYE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs ECDA Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9.00M. In comparison, ECDA has a market cap of 11.96M. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while ECDA trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas ECDA's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to ECDA's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to ECDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs PEV Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9.00M. In comparison, PEV has a market cap of 10.58M. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while PEV trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas PEV's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to PEV's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to PEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs LOBO Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9.00M. In comparison, LOBO has a market cap of 9.23M. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while LOBO trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas LOBO's P/E ratio is -9.73. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to LOBO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to LOBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs SVMH Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9.00M. In comparison, SVMH has a market cap of 8.01M. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while SVMH trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas SVMH's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to SVMH's ROE of +43.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to SVMH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs EVTV Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9.00M. In comparison, EVTV has a market cap of 5.82M. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while EVTV trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas EVTV's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to EVTV's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to EVTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs GOEV Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9.00M. In comparison, GOEV has a market cap of 5.36M. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while GOEV trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas GOEV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to GOEV's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to GOEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs HYZN Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9.00M. In comparison, HYZN has a market cap of 4.97M. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while HYZN trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas HYZN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to HYZN's ROE of -2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to HYZN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs MULN Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9.00M. In comparison, MULN has a market cap of 4.84M. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while MULN trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas MULN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to MULN's ROE of +1271.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to MULN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs WKHS Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9.00M. In comparison, WKHS has a market cap of 4.59M. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while WKHS trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas WKHS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to WKHS's ROE of -2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to WKHS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs AYRO Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9.00M. In comparison, AYRO has a market cap of 3.44M. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while AYRO trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas AYRO's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to AYRO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is less volatile compared to AYRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs PSNYW Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9.00M. In comparison, PSNYW has a market cap of 3.36M. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while PSNYW trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas PSNYW's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to PSNYW's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to PSNYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs FFAIW Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9.00M. In comparison, FFAIW has a market cap of 3.01M. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while FFAIW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas FFAIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to FFAIW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to FFAIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs EGOX Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9.00M. In comparison, EGOX has a market cap of 2.89M. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while EGOX trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas EGOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to EGOX's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to EGOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs VLCN Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9.00M. In comparison, VLCN has a market cap of 2.78M. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while VLCN trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas VLCN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to VLCN's ROE of -2.95%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to VLCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs VEV Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9.00M. In comparison, VEV has a market cap of 2.53M. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while VEV trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas VEV's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to VEV's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is less volatile compared to VEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs ZAPP Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9.00M. In comparison, ZAPP has a market cap of 2.29M. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while ZAPP trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas ZAPP's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to ZAPP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to ZAPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs AIEV Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9.00M. In comparison, AIEV has a market cap of 608696.00. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while AIEV trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas AIEV's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to AIEV's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to AIEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs ECDAW Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9.00M. In comparison, ECDAW has a market cap of 552016.00. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while ECDAW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas ECDAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to ECDAW's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to ECDAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs GOEVW Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9.00M. In comparison, GOEVW has a market cap of 365712.00. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while GOEVW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas GOEVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to GOEVW's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to GOEVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.