Arrival
Arrival ARVL Peers
See (ARVL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARVL | $0.49 | -33.69% | 9M | -0.07 | -$6.69 | N/A |
| TSLA | $315.06 | -0.82% | 967.2B | 172.82 | $1.74 | N/A |
| TM | $172.09 | -0.10% | 223.7B | 6.97 | $24.59 | +3.15% |
| RACE | $491.42 | +0.14% | 87.2B | 48.45 | $10.10 | +0.69% |
| GM | $52.58 | +6.85% | 50B | 7.26 | $7.16 | +0.99% |
| F | $11.74 | +8.16% | 44.3B | 9.08 | $1.25 | +6.61% |
| F-PB | $21.57 | +2.81% | 42.7B | N/A | N/A | +6.61% |
| F-PD | $22.96 | +2.50% | 42B | N/A | N/A | +6.61% |
| F-PC | $21.31 | +2.51% | 41.8B | N/A | N/A | +6.61% |
| STLA | $10.30 | +2.69% | 29.3B | 4.84 | $2.11 | +7.54% |
Stock Comparison
ARVL vs TSLA Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9M. In comparison, TSLA has a market cap of 967.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while TSLA trades at $315.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas TSLA's P/E ratio is 172.82. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to TSLA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to TSLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs TM Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9M. In comparison, TM has a market cap of 223.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while TM trades at $172.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas TM's P/E ratio is 6.97. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to TM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to TM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs RACE Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9M. In comparison, RACE has a market cap of 87.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while RACE trades at $491.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas RACE's P/E ratio is 48.45. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to RACE's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to RACE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs GM Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9M. In comparison, GM has a market cap of 50B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while GM trades at $52.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas GM's P/E ratio is 7.26. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to GM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to GM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs F Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9M. In comparison, F has a market cap of 44.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while F trades at $11.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas F's P/E ratio is 9.08. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to F's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs F-PB Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9M. In comparison, F-PB has a market cap of 42.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while F-PB trades at $21.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas F-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to F-PB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to F-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs F-PD Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9M. In comparison, F-PD has a market cap of 42B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while F-PD trades at $22.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas F-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to F-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to F-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs F-PC Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9M. In comparison, F-PC has a market cap of 41.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while F-PC trades at $21.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas F-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to F-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to F-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs STLA Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9M. In comparison, STLA has a market cap of 29.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while STLA trades at $10.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas STLA's P/E ratio is 4.84. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to STLA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to STLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs XPEV Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9M. In comparison, XPEV has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while XPEV trades at $18.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas XPEV's P/E ratio is -24.36. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to XPEV's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to XPEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs RIVN Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9M. In comparison, RIVN has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while RIVN trades at $13.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas RIVN's P/E ratio is -3.65. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to RIVN's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to RIVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs HMC Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9M. In comparison, HMC has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while HMC trades at $29.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas HMC's P/E ratio is 7.87. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to HMC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to HMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs LI Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9M. In comparison, LI has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while LI trades at $26.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas LI's P/E ratio is 25.31. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to LI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to LI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs VFS Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9M. In comparison, VFS has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while VFS trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas VFS's P/E ratio is -2.72. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to VFS's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to VFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs NIO Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9M. In comparison, NIO has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while NIO trades at $3.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas NIO's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to NIO's ROE of -2.94%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to NIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs ZK Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9M. In comparison, ZK has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while ZK trades at $25.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas ZK's P/E ratio is -9.06. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to ZK's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to ZK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs LCID Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9M. In comparison, LCID has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while LCID trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas LCID's P/E ratio is -1.71. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to LCID's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to LCID. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs PSNY Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9M. In comparison, PSNY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while PSNY trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas PSNY's P/E ratio is -1.18. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to PSNY's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to PSNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs LOT Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9M. In comparison, LOT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while LOT trades at $2.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas LOT's P/E ratio is -1.28. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to LOT's ROE of +3.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to LOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs BLBD Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9M. In comparison, BLBD has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while BLBD trades at $45.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas BLBD's P/E ratio is 13.73. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to BLBD's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to BLBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs LVWR Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9M. In comparison, LVWR has a market cap of 942.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while LVWR trades at $4.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas LVWR's P/E ratio is -10.77. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to LVWR's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to LVWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs NAKD Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9M. In comparison, NAKD has a market cap of 682M. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while NAKD trades at $2.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas NAKD's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to NAKD's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to NAKD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs VFSWW Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9M. In comparison, VFSWW has a market cap of 643.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while VFSWW trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas VFSWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to VFSWW's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to VFSWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs PSNYW Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9M. In comparison, PSNYW has a market cap of 301.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while PSNYW trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas PSNYW's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to PSNYW's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to PSNYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs NIU Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9M. In comparison, NIU has a market cap of 266.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while NIU trades at $3.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas NIU's P/E ratio is -11.03. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to NIU's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to NIU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs FFAI Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9M. In comparison, FFAI has a market cap of 166.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while FFAI trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas FFAI's P/E ratio is 0.26. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to FFAI's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to FFAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs FFIE Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9M. In comparison, FFIE has a market cap of 105.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while FFIE trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas FFIE's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to FFIE's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to FFIE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs FFIEW Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9M. In comparison, FFIEW has a market cap of 105.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while FFIEW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas FFIEW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to FFIEW's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to FFIEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs LOTWW Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9M. In comparison, LOTWW has a market cap of 70.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while LOTWW trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas LOTWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to LOTWW's ROE of +3.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to LOTWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs CJET Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9M. In comparison, CJET has a market cap of 63.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while CJET trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas CJET's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to CJET's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to CJET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs FSR Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9M. In comparison, FSR has a market cap of 52.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while FSR trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas FSR's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to FSR's ROE of -2.72%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to FSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs FLYE Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9M. In comparison, FLYE has a market cap of 52.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while FLYE trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas FLYE's P/E ratio is -16.35. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to FLYE's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to FLYE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs CENN Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9M. In comparison, CENN has a market cap of 32.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while CENN trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas CENN's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to CENN's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to CENN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs SOLO Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9M. In comparison, SOLO has a market cap of 25.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while SOLO trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas SOLO's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to SOLO's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to SOLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs RIDE Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9M. In comparison, RIDE has a market cap of 21.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while RIDE trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas RIDE's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to RIDE's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to RIDE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs ECDAW Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9M. In comparison, ECDAW has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while ECDAW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas ECDAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to ECDAW's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to ECDAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs WKHS Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9M. In comparison, WKHS has a market cap of 11.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while WKHS trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas WKHS's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to WKHS's ROE of -2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to WKHS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs GP Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9M. In comparison, GP has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while GP trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas GP's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to GP's ROE of -3.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to GP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs PEV Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9M. In comparison, PEV has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while PEV trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas PEV's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to PEV's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to PEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs ECDA Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9M. In comparison, ECDA has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while ECDA trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas ECDA's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to ECDA's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to ECDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs SVMH Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9M. In comparison, SVMH has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while SVMH trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas SVMH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to SVMH's ROE of +43.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is less volatile compared to SVMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs AIEV Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9M. In comparison, AIEV has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while AIEV trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas AIEV's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to AIEV's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to AIEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs GOEV Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9M. In comparison, GOEV has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while GOEV trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas GOEV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to GOEV's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to GOEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs HYZN Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9M. In comparison, HYZN has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while HYZN trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas HYZN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to HYZN's ROE of -2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to HYZN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs EVTV Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9M. In comparison, EVTV has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while EVTV trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas EVTV's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to EVTV's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to EVTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs AYRO Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9M. In comparison, AYRO has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while AYRO trades at $7.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas AYRO's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to AYRO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to AYRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs LOBO Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9M. In comparison, LOBO has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while LOBO trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas LOBO's P/E ratio is -4.44. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to LOBO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to LOBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs DMN Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9M. In comparison, DMN has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while DMN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas DMN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to DMN's ROE of -48.65%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to DMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs VLCN Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9M. In comparison, VLCN has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while VLCN trades at $6.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas VLCN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to VLCN's ROE of -2.95%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to VLCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs FFAIW Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9M. In comparison, FFAIW has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while FFAIW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas FFAIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to FFAIW's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to FFAIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs EGOX Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9M. In comparison, EGOX has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while EGOX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas EGOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to EGOX's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to EGOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs VEV Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9M. In comparison, VEV has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while VEV trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas VEV's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to VEV's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is less volatile compared to VEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs ZAPP Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9M. In comparison, ZAPP has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while ZAPP trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas ZAPP's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to ZAPP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is less volatile compared to ZAPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs MULN Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9M. In comparison, MULN has a market cap of 618.2K. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while MULN trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas MULN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to MULN's ROE of +10.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to MULN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs GOEVW Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9M. In comparison, GOEVW has a market cap of 365.7K. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while GOEVW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas GOEVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to GOEVW's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to GOEVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs TTM Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9M. In comparison, TTM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while TTM trades at $25.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas TTM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to TTM's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to TTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs PTRA Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9M. In comparison, PTRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while PTRA trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas PTRA's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to PTRA's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to PTRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs ADOM Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9M. In comparison, ADOM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while ADOM trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas ADOM's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to ADOM's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to ADOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs ELMS Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9M. In comparison, ELMS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while ELMS trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas ELMS's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to ELMS's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is less volatile compared to ELMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs SEV Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9M. In comparison, SEV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while SEV trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas SEV's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to SEV's ROE of -5.71%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to SEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.
ARVL vs SOLOW Comparison
ARVL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARVL stands at 9M. In comparison, SOLOW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ARVL is priced at $0.49, while SOLOW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARVL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas SOLOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARVL's ROE is -1.77%, compared to SOLOW's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, ARVL is more volatile compared to SOLOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARVL.