Arrow Greentech Limited
Arrow Greentech Limited (ARROWGREEN.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ARROWGREEN.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaging & Containers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARROWGREEN.BO | ₹417.95 | +0.00% | 6.2B | 12.23 | ₹33.75 | +0.97% |
| TIMETECHNO.NS | ₹188.87 | +0.00% | 93.3B | 19.37 | ₹9.76 | +0.66% |
| TIMETECHNO.BO | ₹189.00 | +0.00% | 93.2B | 19.36 | ₹9.75 | +0.66% |
| EPL.BO | ₹215.10 | +0.00% | 69.1B | 17.27 | ₹12.50 | +2.32% |
| EPL.NS | ₹215.07 | +0.00% | 69.1B | 17.27 | ₹12.50 | +2.32% |
| BORORENEW.BO | ₹465.25 | +0.00% | 66.4B | -105.29 | -₹4.50 | N/A |
| BORORENEW.NS | ₹464.55 | +0.00% | 66.4B | -105.01 | -₹4.51 | N/A |
| AGI.BO | ₹550.00 | +0.00% | 36B | 10.81 | ₹51.45 | N/A |
| AGI.NS | ₹549.95 | +0.00% | 36B | 10.80 | ₹51.45 | N/A |
| UFLEX.BO | ₹458.60 | +0.00% | 33.9B | 8.70 | ₹54.04 | +0.64% |
Stock Comparison
ARROWGREEN.BO vs TIMETECHNO.NS Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, TIMETECHNO.NS has a market cap of 93.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while TIMETECHNO.NS trades at ₹188.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas TIMETECHNO.NS's P/E ratio is 19.37. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TIMETECHNO.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is more volatile compared to TIMETECHNO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check TIMETECHNO.NS's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs TIMETECHNO.BO Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, TIMETECHNO.BO has a market cap of 93.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while TIMETECHNO.BO trades at ₹189.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas TIMETECHNO.BO's P/E ratio is 19.36. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TIMETECHNO.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is more volatile compared to TIMETECHNO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check TIMETECHNO.BO's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs EPL.BO Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, EPL.BO has a market cap of 69.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while EPL.BO trades at ₹215.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas EPL.BO's P/E ratio is 17.27. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to EPL.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is more volatile compared to EPL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check EPL.BO's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs EPL.NS Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, EPL.NS has a market cap of 69.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while EPL.NS trades at ₹215.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas EPL.NS's P/E ratio is 17.27. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to EPL.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is more volatile compared to EPL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check EPL.NS's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs BORORENEW.BO Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, BORORENEW.BO has a market cap of 66.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while BORORENEW.BO trades at ₹465.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas BORORENEW.BO's P/E ratio is -105.29. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BORORENEW.BO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is less volatile compared to BORORENEW.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check BORORENEW.BO's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs BORORENEW.NS Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, BORORENEW.NS has a market cap of 66.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while BORORENEW.NS trades at ₹464.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas BORORENEW.NS's P/E ratio is -105.01. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BORORENEW.NS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is less volatile compared to BORORENEW.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check BORORENEW.NS's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs AGI.BO Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, AGI.BO has a market cap of 36B. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while AGI.BO trades at ₹550.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas AGI.BO's P/E ratio is 10.81. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AGI.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is less volatile compared to AGI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check AGI.BO's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs AGI.NS Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, AGI.NS has a market cap of 36B. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while AGI.NS trades at ₹549.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas AGI.NS's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AGI.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is less volatile compared to AGI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check AGI.NS's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs UFLEX.BO Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, UFLEX.BO has a market cap of 33.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while UFLEX.BO trades at ₹458.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas UFLEX.BO's P/E ratio is 8.70. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to UFLEX.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is more volatile compared to UFLEX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check UFLEX.BO's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs UFLEX.NS Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, UFLEX.NS has a market cap of 33.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while UFLEX.NS trades at ₹457.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas UFLEX.NS's P/E ratio is 11.71. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to UFLEX.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is more volatile compared to UFLEX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check UFLEX.NS's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs MAXVIL.NS Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, MAXVIL.NS has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while MAXVIL.NS trades at ₹216.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas MAXVIL.NS's P/E ratio is 189.47. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to MAXVIL.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is less volatile compared to MAXVIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check MAXVIL.NS's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs TCPLPACK.NS Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, TCPLPACK.NS has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while TCPLPACK.NS trades at ₹2,718.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas TCPLPACK.NS's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TCPLPACK.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is less volatile compared to TCPLPACK.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check TCPLPACK.NS's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs TCPLPACK.BO Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, TCPLPACK.BO has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while TCPLPACK.BO trades at ₹2,719.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas TCPLPACK.BO's P/E ratio is 21.98. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TCPLPACK.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is more volatile compared to TCPLPACK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check TCPLPACK.BO's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs MOLDTKPAC.NS Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, MOLDTKPAC.NS has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while MOLDTKPAC.NS trades at ₹563.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas MOLDTKPAC.NS's P/E ratio is 27.33. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to MOLDTKPAC.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is less volatile compared to MOLDTKPAC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check MOLDTKPAC.NS's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs MOLDTKPAC.BO Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, MOLDTKPAC.BO has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while MOLDTKPAC.BO trades at ₹562.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas MOLDTKPAC.BO's P/E ratio is 27.25. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to MOLDTKPAC.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is more volatile compared to MOLDTKPAC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check MOLDTKPAC.BO's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs COSMOFIRST.NS Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, COSMOFIRST.NS has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while COSMOFIRST.NS trades at ₹653.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas COSMOFIRST.NS's P/E ratio is 12.51. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to COSMOFIRST.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is more volatile compared to COSMOFIRST.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check COSMOFIRST.NS's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs COSMOFIRST.BO Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, COSMOFIRST.BO has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while COSMOFIRST.BO trades at ₹653.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas COSMOFIRST.BO's P/E ratio is 12.51. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to COSMOFIRST.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is more volatile compared to COSMOFIRST.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check COSMOFIRST.BO's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs HUHTAMAKI.BO Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, HUHTAMAKI.BO has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while HUHTAMAKI.BO trades at ₹175.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas HUHTAMAKI.BO's P/E ratio is 11.05. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to HUHTAMAKI.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is more volatile compared to HUHTAMAKI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check HUHTAMAKI.BO's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs HUHTAMAKI.NS Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, HUHTAMAKI.NS has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while HUHTAMAKI.NS trades at ₹175.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas HUHTAMAKI.NS's P/E ratio is 11.03. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is more volatile compared to HUHTAMAKI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check HUHTAMAKI.NS's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs ORICONENT.BO Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, ORICONENT.BO has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while ORICONENT.BO trades at ₹63.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas ORICONENT.BO's P/E ratio is 33.76. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ORICONENT.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is less volatile compared to ORICONENT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check ORICONENT.BO's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs ORICONENT.NS Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, ORICONENT.NS has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while ORICONENT.NS trades at ₹64.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas ORICONENT.NS's P/E ratio is 33.68. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ORICONENT.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is less volatile compared to ORICONENT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check ORICONENT.NS's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs BOROSCI.NS Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, BOROSCI.NS has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while BOROSCI.NS trades at ₹105.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas BOROSCI.NS's P/E ratio is 57.85. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BOROSCI.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is less volatile compared to BOROSCI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check BOROSCI.NS's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs SHREERAMA.NS Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, SHREERAMA.NS has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while SHREERAMA.NS trades at ₹55.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas SHREERAMA.NS's P/E ratio is 13.53. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SHREERAMA.NS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is less volatile compared to SHREERAMA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check SHREERAMA.NS's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs SHREERAMA.BO Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, SHREERAMA.BO has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while SHREERAMA.BO trades at ₹55.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas SHREERAMA.BO's P/E ratio is 13.46. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SHREERAMA.BO's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is less volatile compared to SHREERAMA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check SHREERAMA.BO's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs COMSYN.BO Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, COMSYN.BO has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while COMSYN.BO trades at ₹190.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas COMSYN.BO's P/E ratio is 23.20. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to COMSYN.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is less volatile compared to COMSYN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check COMSYN.BO's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs ARROWGREEN.NS Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, ARROWGREEN.NS has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while ARROWGREEN.NS trades at ₹418.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas ARROWGREEN.NS's P/E ratio is 12.27. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ARROWGREEN.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is more volatile compared to ARROWGREEN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check ARROWGREEN.NS's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs NAHARPOLY.BO Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, NAHARPOLY.BO has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while NAHARPOLY.BO trades at ₹239.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas NAHARPOLY.BO's P/E ratio is 8.54. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to NAHARPOLY.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is less volatile compared to NAHARPOLY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check NAHARPOLY.BO's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs NAHARPOLY.NS Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, NAHARPOLY.NS has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while NAHARPOLY.NS trades at ₹236.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas NAHARPOLY.NS's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to NAHARPOLY.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is less volatile compared to NAHARPOLY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check NAHARPOLY.NS's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs COMSYN.NS Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, COMSYN.NS has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while COMSYN.NS trades at ₹190.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas COMSYN.NS's P/E ratio is 22.78. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to COMSYN.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is less volatile compared to COMSYN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check COMSYN.NS's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs PYRAMID.NS Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, PYRAMID.NS has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while PYRAMID.NS trades at ₹151.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas PYRAMID.NS's P/E ratio is 21.75. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to PYRAMID.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is more volatile compared to PYRAMID.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check PYRAMID.NS's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs PYRAMID.BO Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, PYRAMID.BO has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while PYRAMID.BO trades at ₹151.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas PYRAMID.BO's P/E ratio is 21.67. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to PYRAMID.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is more volatile compared to PYRAMID.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check PYRAMID.BO's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs TPLPLASTEH.NS Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, TPLPLASTEH.NS has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while TPLPLASTEH.NS trades at ₹69.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas TPLPLASTEH.NS's P/E ratio is 19.37. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TPLPLASTEH.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is more volatile compared to TPLPLASTEH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check TPLPLASTEH.NS's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs HALDYNGL.BO Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, HALDYNGL.BO has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while HALDYNGL.BO trades at ₹88.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas HALDYNGL.BO's P/E ratio is 23.32. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to HALDYNGL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is less volatile compared to HALDYNGL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check HALDYNGL.BO's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs KANPRPLA.NS Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, KANPRPLA.NS has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while KANPRPLA.NS trades at ₹187.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas KANPRPLA.NS's P/E ratio is 14.78. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to KANPRPLA.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is less volatile compared to KANPRPLA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check KANPRPLA.NS's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs KANPRPLA.BO Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, KANPRPLA.BO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while KANPRPLA.BO trades at ₹187.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas KANPRPLA.BO's P/E ratio is 14.70. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to KANPRPLA.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is less volatile compared to KANPRPLA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check KANPRPLA.BO's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs BBTCL.BO Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, BBTCL.BO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while BBTCL.BO trades at ₹176.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas BBTCL.BO's P/E ratio is 29.91. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BBTCL.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is more volatile compared to BBTCL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check BBTCL.BO's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs BBTCL.NS Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, BBTCL.NS has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while BBTCL.NS trades at ₹178.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas BBTCL.NS's P/E ratio is 28.28. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BBTCL.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is more volatile compared to BBTCL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check BBTCL.NS's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs KALYANI.BO Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, KALYANI.BO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while KALYANI.BO trades at ₹472.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas KALYANI.BO's P/E ratio is 21.20. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to KALYANI.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is more volatile compared to KALYANI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check KALYANI.BO's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs RDBRL.BO Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, RDBRL.BO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while RDBRL.BO trades at ₹161.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas RDBRL.BO's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to RDBRL.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is less volatile compared to RDBRL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check RDBRL.BO's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs SAH.BO Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, SAH.BO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while SAH.BO trades at ₹106.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas SAH.BO's P/E ratio is 368.79. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SAH.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is more volatile compared to SAH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check SAH.BO's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs SAH.NS Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, SAH.NS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while SAH.NS trades at ₹104.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas SAH.NS's P/E ratio is 361.21. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SAH.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is less volatile compared to SAH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check SAH.NS's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs HITECHCORP.NS Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, HITECHCORP.NS has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while HITECHCORP.NS trades at ₹147.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas HITECHCORP.NS's P/E ratio is 34.91. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to HITECHCORP.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is more volatile compared to HITECHCORP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check HITECHCORP.NS's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs HITECHCORP.BO Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, HITECHCORP.BO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while HITECHCORP.BO trades at ₹148.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas HITECHCORP.BO's P/E ratio is 34.84. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to HITECHCORP.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is more volatile compared to HITECHCORP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check HITECHCORP.BO's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs PGFOILQ.BO Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, PGFOILQ.BO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while PGFOILQ.BO trades at ₹219.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas PGFOILQ.BO's P/E ratio is 35.86. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to PGFOILQ.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is less volatile compared to PGFOILQ.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check PGFOILQ.BO's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs WORTH.NS Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, WORTH.NS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while WORTH.NS trades at ₹159.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas WORTH.NS's P/E ratio is 16.24. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to WORTH.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is more volatile compared to WORTH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check WORTH.NS's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs BALAJEE.NS Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, BALAJEE.NS has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while BALAJEE.NS trades at ₹30.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas BALAJEE.NS's P/E ratio is 13.08. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BALAJEE.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is less volatile compared to BALAJEE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check BALAJEE.NS's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs WORTHPERI.NS Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, WORTHPERI.NS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while WORTHPERI.NS trades at ₹137.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas WORTHPERI.NS's P/E ratio is 13.36. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to WORTHPERI.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is less volatile compared to WORTHPERI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check WORTHPERI.NS's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs WORTHPERI.BO Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, WORTHPERI.BO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while WORTHPERI.BO trades at ₹138.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas WORTHPERI.BO's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to WORTHPERI.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is more volatile compared to WORTHPERI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check WORTHPERI.BO's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs HPBL.BO Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, HPBL.BO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while HPBL.BO trades at ₹177.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas HPBL.BO's P/E ratio is 8.13. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to HPBL.BO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is more volatile compared to HPBL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check HPBL.BO's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs AERONEU.BO Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, AERONEU.BO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while AERONEU.BO trades at ₹65.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas AERONEU.BO's P/E ratio is 91.09. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AERONEU.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is more volatile compared to AERONEU.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check AERONEU.BO's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs EMMBI.NS Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, EMMBI.NS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while EMMBI.NS trades at ₹90.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas EMMBI.NS's P/E ratio is 22.48. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to EMMBI.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is more volatile compared to EMMBI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check EMMBI.NS's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs AERONEU.NS Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, AERONEU.NS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while AERONEU.NS trades at ₹69.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas AERONEU.NS's P/E ratio is 89.82. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AERONEU.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is more volatile compared to AERONEU.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check AERONEU.NS's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs EMMBI.BO Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, EMMBI.BO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while EMMBI.BO trades at ₹91.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas EMMBI.BO's P/E ratio is 22.32. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to EMMBI.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is more volatile compared to EMMBI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check EMMBI.BO's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs EASTINDIA.BO Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, EASTINDIA.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while EASTINDIA.BO trades at ₹117.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas EASTINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 37.12. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to EASTINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is less volatile compared to EASTINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check EASTINDIA.BO's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs ECOPLAST.BO Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, ECOPLAST.BO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while ECOPLAST.BO trades at ₹473.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas ECOPLAST.BO's P/E ratio is 20.32. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ECOPLAST.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is less volatile compared to ECOPLAST.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check ECOPLAST.BO's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs BI.BO Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, BI.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while BI.BO trades at ₹62.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas BI.BO's P/E ratio is -6.65. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BI.BO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is more volatile compared to BI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check BI.BO's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs KAIRA.BO Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, KAIRA.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while KAIRA.BO trades at ₹1,380.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas KAIRA.BO's P/E ratio is 40.06. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to KAIRA.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is more volatile compared to KAIRA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check KAIRA.BO's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs RPPL.NS Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, RPPL.NS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while RPPL.NS trades at ₹17.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas RPPL.NS's P/E ratio is 11.24. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to RPPL.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is less volatile compared to RPPL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check RPPL.NS's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs HINDTIN.BO Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, HINDTIN.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while HINDTIN.BO trades at ₹122.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas HINDTIN.BO's P/E ratio is 12.29. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to HINDTIN.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is more volatile compared to HINDTIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check HINDTIN.BO's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs WORTH.BO Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, WORTH.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while WORTH.BO trades at ₹3.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas WORTH.BO's P/E ratio is 56.67. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to WORTH.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is less volatile compared to WORTH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check WORTH.BO's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs BISIL.BO Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, BISIL.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while BISIL.BO trades at ₹2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas BISIL.BO's P/E ratio is 5.92. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BISIL.BO's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is more volatile compared to BISIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check BISIL.BO's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs CAPRIHANS.BO Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, CAPRIHANS.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while CAPRIHANS.BO trades at ₹81.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas CAPRIHANS.BO's P/E ratio is -2.26. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CAPRIHANS.BO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is less volatile compared to CAPRIHANS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check CAPRIHANS.BO's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs SHETR.BO Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, SHETR.BO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while SHETR.BO trades at ₹109.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas SHETR.BO's P/E ratio is 30.96. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SHETR.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is more volatile compared to SHETR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check SHETR.BO's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs CLARA.BO Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, CLARA.BO has a market cap of 975.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while CLARA.BO trades at ₹38.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas CLARA.BO's P/E ratio is 45.24. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CLARA.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is more volatile compared to CLARA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check CLARA.BO's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs GUJCONT.BO Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, GUJCONT.BO has a market cap of 926.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while GUJCONT.BO trades at ₹163.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas GUJCONT.BO's P/E ratio is 13.85. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to GUJCONT.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is more volatile compared to GUJCONT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check GUJCONT.BO's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs BAPACK.BO Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, BAPACK.BO has a market cap of 847.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while BAPACK.BO trades at ₹163.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas BAPACK.BO's P/E ratio is 10.23. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BAPACK.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is less volatile compared to BAPACK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check BAPACK.BO's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs AMDIND.NS Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, AMDIND.NS has a market cap of 811.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while AMDIND.NS trades at ₹42.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas AMDIND.NS's P/E ratio is -26.30. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AMDIND.NS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is less volatile compared to AMDIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check AMDIND.NS's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs TOKYOPLAST.BO Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, TOKYOPLAST.BO has a market cap of 806.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while TOKYOPLAST.BO trades at ₹93.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas TOKYOPLAST.BO's P/E ratio is 76.44. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TOKYOPLAST.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is less volatile compared to TOKYOPLAST.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check TOKYOPLAST.BO's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs AMDIND.BO Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, AMDIND.BO has a market cap of 804.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while AMDIND.BO trades at ₹41.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas AMDIND.BO's P/E ratio is -26.08. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AMDIND.BO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is less volatile compared to AMDIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check AMDIND.BO's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs SHALIWIR.BO Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, SHALIWIR.BO has a market cap of 801.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while SHALIWIR.BO trades at ₹18.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas SHALIWIR.BO's P/E ratio is 21.31. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SHALIWIR.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is less volatile compared to SHALIWIR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check SHALIWIR.BO's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs TOKYOPLAST.NS Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, TOKYOPLAST.NS has a market cap of 797.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while TOKYOPLAST.NS trades at ₹87.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas TOKYOPLAST.NS's P/E ratio is 75.59. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TOKYOPLAST.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is less volatile compared to TOKYOPLAST.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check TOKYOPLAST.NS's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs HINDNATGLS.NS Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, HINDNATGLS.NS has a market cap of 791.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while HINDNATGLS.NS trades at ₹8.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas HINDNATGLS.NS's P/E ratio is -4.31. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to HINDNATGLS.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is more volatile compared to HINDNATGLS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check HINDNATGLS.NS's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs ORIENTLTD.NS Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, ORIENTLTD.NS has a market cap of 619.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while ORIENTLTD.NS trades at ₹62.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas ORIENTLTD.NS's P/E ratio is -21.90. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ORIENTLTD.NS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is less volatile compared to ORIENTLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check ORIENTLTD.NS's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs ORIENTLTD.BO Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, ORIENTLTD.BO has a market cap of 612.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while ORIENTLTD.BO trades at ₹60.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas ORIENTLTD.BO's P/E ratio is -21.64. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ORIENTLTD.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is more volatile compared to ORIENTLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check ORIENTLTD.BO's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs PERFEPA.BO Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, PERFEPA.BO has a market cap of 566.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while PERFEPA.BO trades at ₹81.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas PERFEPA.BO's P/E ratio is 14.99. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to PERFEPA.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is less volatile compared to PERFEPA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check PERFEPA.BO's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs BALKRISHNA.BO Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, BALKRISHNA.BO has a market cap of 511.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while BALKRISHNA.BO trades at ₹15.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas BALKRISHNA.BO's P/E ratio is -8.40. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BALKRISHNA.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is less volatile compared to BALKRISHNA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check BALKRISHNA.BO's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs GUJCRAFT.BO Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, GUJCRAFT.BO has a market cap of 508.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while GUJCRAFT.BO trades at ₹104.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas GUJCRAFT.BO's P/E ratio is 20.01. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to GUJCRAFT.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is less volatile compared to GUJCRAFT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check GUJCRAFT.BO's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs BALKRISHNA.NS Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, BALKRISHNA.NS has a market cap of 508.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while BALKRISHNA.NS trades at ₹16.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas BALKRISHNA.NS's P/E ratio is -8.34. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BALKRISHNA.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is less volatile compared to BALKRISHNA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check BALKRISHNA.NS's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs SIEL.BO Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, SIEL.BO has a market cap of 505.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while SIEL.BO trades at ₹36.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas SIEL.BO's P/E ratio is 7.18. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SIEL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is more volatile compared to SIEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check SIEL.BO's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs JUMBO.BO Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, JUMBO.BO has a market cap of 500.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while JUMBO.BO trades at ₹56.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas JUMBO.BO's P/E ratio is 6.10. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to JUMBO.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is less volatile compared to JUMBO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check JUMBO.BO's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs SPL.BO Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, SPL.BO has a market cap of 447.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while SPL.BO trades at ₹23.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas SPL.BO's P/E ratio is 5.96. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SPL.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is less volatile compared to SPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check SPL.BO's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs INNOVTEC.BO Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, INNOVTEC.BO has a market cap of 381.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while INNOVTEC.BO trades at ₹17.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas INNOVTEC.BO's P/E ratio is -13.39. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to INNOVTEC.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is less volatile compared to INNOVTEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check INNOVTEC.BO's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs PEARLPOLY.BO Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, PEARLPOLY.BO has a market cap of 331.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while PEARLPOLY.BO trades at ₹19.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas PEARLPOLY.BO's P/E ratio is -5.83. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to PEARLPOLY.BO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is less volatile compared to PEARLPOLY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check PEARLPOLY.BO's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs PEARLPOLY.NS Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, PEARLPOLY.NS has a market cap of 318.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while PEARLPOLY.NS trades at ₹19.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas PEARLPOLY.NS's P/E ratio is -5.60. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to PEARLPOLY.NS's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is less volatile compared to PEARLPOLY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check PEARLPOLY.NS's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs RISHITECH.BO Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, RISHITECH.BO has a market cap of 305.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while RISHITECH.BO trades at ₹40.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas RISHITECH.BO's P/E ratio is 10.38. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to RISHITECH.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is less volatile compared to RISHITECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check RISHITECH.BO's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs POLYSPIN.BO Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, POLYSPIN.BO has a market cap of 305M. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while POLYSPIN.BO trades at ₹29.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas POLYSPIN.BO's P/E ratio is 5.58. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to POLYSPIN.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is less volatile compared to POLYSPIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check POLYSPIN.BO's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs KSHITIJPOL.NS Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, KSHITIJPOL.NS has a market cap of 250.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while KSHITIJPOL.NS trades at ₹2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas KSHITIJPOL.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to KSHITIJPOL.NS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is less volatile compared to KSHITIJPOL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check KSHITIJPOL.NS's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs RCAN.BO Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, RCAN.BO has a market cap of 241.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while RCAN.BO trades at ₹23.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas RCAN.BO's P/E ratio is 11.12. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to RCAN.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is more volatile compared to RCAN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check RCAN.BO's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs JAUSPOL.BO Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, JAUSPOL.BO has a market cap of 168.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while JAUSPOL.BO trades at ₹35.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas JAUSPOL.BO's P/E ratio is 330.82. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to JAUSPOL.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is more volatile compared to JAUSPOL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check JAUSPOL.BO's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs TRANSFRE.BO Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, TRANSFRE.BO has a market cap of 156.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while TRANSFRE.BO trades at ₹22.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas TRANSFRE.BO's P/E ratio is 9.11. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TRANSFRE.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is less volatile compared to TRANSFRE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check TRANSFRE.BO's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs ANUROOP.BO Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, ANUROOP.BO has a market cap of 142M. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while ANUROOP.BO trades at ₹12.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas ANUROOP.BO's P/E ratio is 3.58. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ANUROOP.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is less volatile compared to ANUROOP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check ANUROOP.BO's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs RAJPACK.BO Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, RAJPACK.BO has a market cap of 135.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while RAJPACK.BO trades at ₹29.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas RAJPACK.BO's P/E ratio is -39.60. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to RAJPACK.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is less volatile compared to RAJPACK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check RAJPACK.BO's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs GKP.BO Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, GKP.BO has a market cap of 134.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while GKP.BO trades at ₹6.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas GKP.BO's P/E ratio is 16.54. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to GKP.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is more volatile compared to GKP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check GKP.BO's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs ANTGRAPHIC.NS Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, ANTGRAPHIC.NS has a market cap of 133.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while ANTGRAPHIC.NS trades at ₹0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas ANTGRAPHIC.NS's P/E ratio is -28.67. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ANTGRAPHIC.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is less volatile compared to ANTGRAPHIC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check ANTGRAPHIC.NS's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs ARROWHEAD.BO Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, ARROWHEAD.BO has a market cap of 131.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while ARROWHEAD.BO trades at ₹70.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas ARROWHEAD.BO's P/E ratio is -32.30. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ARROWHEAD.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is more volatile compared to ARROWHEAD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check ARROWHEAD.BO's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs TIRTPLS.BO Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, TIRTPLS.BO has a market cap of 111.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while TIRTPLS.BO trades at ₹25.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas TIRTPLS.BO's P/E ratio is 48.06. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TIRTPLS.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is more volatile compared to TIRTPLS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check TIRTPLS.BO's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs AADIIND.BO Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, AADIIND.BO has a market cap of 89.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while AADIIND.BO trades at ₹9.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas AADIIND.BO's P/E ratio is -42.48. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AADIIND.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is less volatile compared to AADIIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check AADIIND.BO's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs YASHRAJC.BO Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, YASHRAJC.BO has a market cap of 86.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while YASHRAJC.BO trades at ₹5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas YASHRAJC.BO's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to YASHRAJC.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is less volatile compared to YASHRAJC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check YASHRAJC.BO's competition here
ARROWGREEN.BO vs STANPACK.BO Comparison February 2026
ARROWGREEN.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARROWGREEN.BO stands at 6.2B. In comparison, STANPACK.BO has a market cap of 71.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ARROWGREEN.BO is priced at ₹417.95, while STANPACK.BO trades at ₹12.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARROWGREEN.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.23, whereas STANPACK.BO's P/E ratio is 73.63. In terms of profitability, ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE is +0.27%, compared to STANPACK.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARROWGREEN.BO is less volatile compared to STANPACK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARROWGREEN.BO.Check STANPACK.BO's competition here