American Rebel Holdings, Inc.
American Rebel Holdings, Inc. (AREBW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (AREBW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Footwear & Accessories Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AREBW | $0.01 | +7.50% | 3.2M | N/A | -$5.74 | N/A |
| NKE | $53.98 | -0.28% | 79.8B | 31.57 | $1.71 | +3.00% |
| DECK | $100.78 | +0.09% | 14.7B | 14.32 | $7.04 | N/A |
| SKX | $63.13 | -0.11% | 9.5B | 14.41 | $4.38 | N/A |
| BIRK | $37.43 | +3.60% | 6.9B | 16.00 | $2.34 | N/A |
| CROX | $77.95 | -2.11% | 4B | -53.39 | -$1.46 | N/A |
| SHOO | $31.37 | -3.80% | 2.3B | 49.79 | $0.63 | +2.66% |
| WINA | $449.51 | -1.47% | 1.6B | 39.74 | $11.31 | +3.10% |
| WWW | $15.98 | -0.87% | 1.3B | 14.94 | $1.07 | +2.52% |
| RCKY | $42.62 | -2.98% | 319.9M | 14.40 | $2.96 | +1.48% |
Stock Comparison
AREBW vs NKE Comparison March 2026
AREBW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AREBW stands at 3.2M. In comparison, NKE has a market cap of 79.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AREBW is priced at $0.01, while NKE trades at $53.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AREBW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NKE's P/E ratio is 31.57. In terms of profitability, AREBW's ROE is +9.44%, compared to NKE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AREBW is more volatile compared to NKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AREBW.Check NKE's competition here
AREBW vs DECK Comparison March 2026
AREBW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AREBW stands at 3.2M. In comparison, DECK has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AREBW is priced at $0.01, while DECK trades at $100.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AREBW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DECK's P/E ratio is 14.32. In terms of profitability, AREBW's ROE is +9.44%, compared to DECK's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, AREBW is more volatile compared to DECK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AREBW.Check DECK's competition here
AREBW vs SKX Comparison March 2026
AREBW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AREBW stands at 3.2M. In comparison, SKX has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AREBW is priced at $0.01, while SKX trades at $63.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AREBW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SKX's P/E ratio is 14.41. In terms of profitability, AREBW's ROE is +9.44%, compared to SKX's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AREBW is more volatile compared to SKX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AREBW.Check SKX's competition here
AREBW vs BIRK Comparison March 2026
AREBW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AREBW stands at 3.2M. In comparison, BIRK has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AREBW is priced at $0.01, while BIRK trades at $37.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AREBW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIRK's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, AREBW's ROE is +9.44%, compared to BIRK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AREBW is more volatile compared to BIRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AREBW.Check BIRK's competition here
AREBW vs CROX Comparison March 2026
AREBW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AREBW stands at 3.2M. In comparison, CROX has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, AREBW is priced at $0.01, while CROX trades at $77.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AREBW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CROX's P/E ratio is -53.39. In terms of profitability, AREBW's ROE is +9.44%, compared to CROX's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AREBW is more volatile compared to CROX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AREBW.Check CROX's competition here
AREBW vs SHOO Comparison March 2026
AREBW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AREBW stands at 3.2M. In comparison, SHOO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AREBW is priced at $0.01, while SHOO trades at $31.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AREBW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHOO's P/E ratio is 49.79. In terms of profitability, AREBW's ROE is +9.44%, compared to SHOO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AREBW is more volatile compared to SHOO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AREBW.Check SHOO's competition here
AREBW vs WINA Comparison March 2026
AREBW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AREBW stands at 3.2M. In comparison, WINA has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AREBW is priced at $0.01, while WINA trades at $449.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AREBW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WINA's P/E ratio is 39.74. In terms of profitability, AREBW's ROE is +9.44%, compared to WINA's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AREBW is less volatile compared to WINA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AREBW.Check WINA's competition here
AREBW vs WWW Comparison March 2026
AREBW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AREBW stands at 3.2M. In comparison, WWW has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AREBW is priced at $0.01, while WWW trades at $15.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AREBW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WWW's P/E ratio is 14.94. In terms of profitability, AREBW's ROE is +9.44%, compared to WWW's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AREBW is more volatile compared to WWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AREBW.Check WWW's competition here
AREBW vs RCKY Comparison March 2026
AREBW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AREBW stands at 3.2M. In comparison, RCKY has a market cap of 319.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AREBW is priced at $0.01, while RCKY trades at $42.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AREBW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RCKY's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, AREBW's ROE is +9.44%, compared to RCKY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AREBW is more volatile compared to RCKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AREBW.Check RCKY's competition here
AREBW vs WEYS Comparison March 2026
AREBW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AREBW stands at 3.2M. In comparison, WEYS has a market cap of 315.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AREBW is priced at $0.01, while WEYS trades at $33.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AREBW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WEYS's P/E ratio is 12.89. In terms of profitability, AREBW's ROE is +9.44%, compared to WEYS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AREBW is more volatile compared to WEYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AREBW.Check WEYS's competition here
AREBW vs CAL Comparison March 2026
AREBW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AREBW stands at 3.2M. In comparison, CAL has a market cap of 313.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AREBW is priced at $0.01, while CAL trades at $9.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AREBW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAL's P/E ratio is 14.47. In terms of profitability, AREBW's ROE is +9.44%, compared to CAL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AREBW is more volatile compared to CAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AREBW.Check CAL's competition here
AREBW vs MAMK Comparison March 2026
AREBW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AREBW stands at 3.2M. In comparison, MAMK has a market cap of 201.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AREBW is priced at $0.01, while MAMK trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AREBW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAMK's P/E ratio is 216.67. In terms of profitability, AREBW's ROE is +9.44%, compared to MAMK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AREBW is more volatile compared to MAMK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AREBW.Check MAMK's competition here
AREBW vs VRA Comparison March 2026
AREBW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AREBW stands at 3.2M. In comparison, VRA has a market cap of 97.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AREBW is priced at $0.01, while VRA trades at $3.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AREBW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VRA's P/E ratio is -1.18. In terms of profitability, AREBW's ROE is +9.44%, compared to VRA's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, AREBW is less volatile compared to VRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AREBW.Check VRA's competition here
AREBW vs SORA Comparison March 2026
AREBW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AREBW stands at 3.2M. In comparison, SORA has a market cap of 47.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AREBW is priced at $0.01, while SORA trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AREBW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SORA's P/E ratio is -189.97. In terms of profitability, AREBW's ROE is +9.44%, compared to SORA's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AREBW is more volatile compared to SORA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AREBW.Check SORA's competition here
AREBW vs FORD Comparison March 2026
AREBW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AREBW stands at 3.2M. In comparison, FORD has a market cap of 15.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AREBW is priced at $0.01, while FORD trades at $9.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AREBW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FORD's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, AREBW's ROE is +9.44%, compared to FORD's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AREBW is less volatile compared to FORD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AREBW.Check FORD's competition here
AREBW vs FWDI Comparison March 2026
AREBW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AREBW stands at 3.2M. In comparison, FWDI has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AREBW is priced at $0.01, while FWDI trades at $4.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AREBW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FWDI's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, AREBW's ROE is +9.44%, compared to FWDI's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AREBW is less volatile compared to FWDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AREBW.Check FWDI's competition here
AREBW vs AREB Comparison March 2026
AREBW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AREBW stands at 3.2M. In comparison, AREB has a market cap of 61K. Regarding current trading prices, AREBW is priced at $0.01, while AREB trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AREBW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AREB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AREBW's ROE is +9.44%, compared to AREB's ROE of +9.44%. Regarding short-term risk, AREBW is more volatile compared to AREB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AREBW.Check AREB's competition here