Anuroop Packaging Limited

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, TIMETECHNO.NS has a market cap of 94.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while TIMETECHNO.NS trades at ₹191.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas TIMETECHNO.NS's P/E ratio is 19.67. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TIMETECHNO.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to TIMETECHNO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check TIMETECHNO.NS's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, TIMETECHNO.BO has a market cap of 94.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while TIMETECHNO.BO trades at ₹191.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas TIMETECHNO.BO's P/E ratio is 19.66. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TIMETECHNO.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to TIMETECHNO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check TIMETECHNO.BO's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, EPL.BO has a market cap of 69.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while EPL.BO trades at ₹216.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas EPL.BO's P/E ratio is 17.32. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EPL.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to EPL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check EPL.BO's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, EPL.NS has a market cap of 69.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while EPL.NS trades at ₹216.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas EPL.NS's P/E ratio is 17.32. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EPL.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to EPL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check EPL.NS's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, BORORENEW.BO has a market cap of 66.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while BORORENEW.BO trades at ₹472.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas BORORENEW.BO's P/E ratio is -105.01. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BORORENEW.BO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to BORORENEW.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check BORORENEW.BO's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, BORORENEW.NS has a market cap of 66.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while BORORENEW.NS trades at ₹472.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas BORORENEW.NS's P/E ratio is -104.66. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BORORENEW.NS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to BORORENEW.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check BORORENEW.NS's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, AGI.NS has a market cap of 36.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while AGI.NS trades at ₹568.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas AGI.NS's P/E ratio is 11.04. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AGI.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to AGI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check AGI.NS's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, AGI.BO has a market cap of 36.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while AGI.BO trades at ₹568.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas AGI.BO's P/E ratio is 11.05. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AGI.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to AGI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check AGI.BO's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, UFLEX.BO has a market cap of 33.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while UFLEX.BO trades at ₹460.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas UFLEX.BO's P/E ratio is 8.51. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to UFLEX.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to UFLEX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check UFLEX.BO's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, UFLEX.NS has a market cap of 33.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while UFLEX.NS trades at ₹458.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas UFLEX.NS's P/E ratio is 11.42. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to UFLEX.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to UFLEX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check UFLEX.NS's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, MAXVIL.NS has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while MAXVIL.NS trades at ₹216.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas MAXVIL.NS's P/E ratio is 189.47. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MAXVIL.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to MAXVIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check MAXVIL.NS's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, TCPLPACK.NS has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while TCPLPACK.NS trades at ₹2,763.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas TCPLPACK.NS's P/E ratio is 22.03. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TCPLPACK.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to TCPLPACK.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check TCPLPACK.NS's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, TCPLPACK.BO has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while TCPLPACK.BO trades at ₹2,763.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas TCPLPACK.BO's P/E ratio is 22.06. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TCPLPACK.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to TCPLPACK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check TCPLPACK.BO's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, MOLDTKPAC.NS has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while MOLDTKPAC.NS trades at ₹577.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas MOLDTKPAC.NS's P/E ratio is 28.01. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MOLDTKPAC.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to MOLDTKPAC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check MOLDTKPAC.NS's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, MOLDTKPAC.BO has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while MOLDTKPAC.BO trades at ₹576.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas MOLDTKPAC.BO's P/E ratio is 27.93. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MOLDTKPAC.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to MOLDTKPAC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check MOLDTKPAC.BO's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, COSMOFIRST.BO has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while COSMOFIRST.BO trades at ₹664.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas COSMOFIRST.BO's P/E ratio is 11.88. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to COSMOFIRST.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to COSMOFIRST.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check COSMOFIRST.BO's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, COSMOFIRST.NS has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while COSMOFIRST.NS trades at ₹664.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas COSMOFIRST.NS's P/E ratio is 11.88. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to COSMOFIRST.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to COSMOFIRST.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check COSMOFIRST.NS's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, HUHTAMAKI.BO has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while HUHTAMAKI.BO trades at ₹179.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas HUHTAMAKI.BO's P/E ratio is 11.47. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HUHTAMAKI.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to HUHTAMAKI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check HUHTAMAKI.BO's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, HUHTAMAKI.NS has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while HUHTAMAKI.NS trades at ₹179.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas HUHTAMAKI.NS's P/E ratio is 11.45. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to HUHTAMAKI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check HUHTAMAKI.NS's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, ORICONENT.BO has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while ORICONENT.BO trades at ₹65.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas ORICONENT.BO's P/E ratio is 32.56. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ORICONENT.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to ORICONENT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check ORICONENT.BO's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, ORICONENT.NS has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while ORICONENT.NS trades at ₹64.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas ORICONENT.NS's P/E ratio is 32.20. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ORICONENT.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to ORICONENT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check ORICONENT.NS's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, BOROSCI.NS has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while BOROSCI.NS trades at ₹110.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas BOROSCI.NS's P/E ratio is 61.21. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BOROSCI.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to BOROSCI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check BOROSCI.NS's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, COMSYN.NS has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while COMSYN.NS trades at ₹192.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas COMSYN.NS's P/E ratio is 28.41. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to COMSYN.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to COMSYN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check COMSYN.NS's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, COMSYN.BO has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while COMSYN.BO trades at ₹192.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas COMSYN.BO's P/E ratio is 28.39. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to COMSYN.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to COMSYN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check COMSYN.BO's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, SHREERAMA.BO has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while SHREERAMA.BO trades at ₹56.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas SHREERAMA.BO's P/E ratio is 13.89. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SHREERAMA.BO's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to SHREERAMA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check SHREERAMA.BO's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, SHREERAMA.NS has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while SHREERAMA.NS trades at ₹56.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas SHREERAMA.NS's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SHREERAMA.NS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to SHREERAMA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check SHREERAMA.NS's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, ARROWGREEN.NS has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while ARROWGREEN.NS trades at ₹425.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas ARROWGREEN.NS's P/E ratio is 12.59. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ARROWGREEN.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to ARROWGREEN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check ARROWGREEN.NS's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, ARROWGREEN.BO has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while ARROWGREEN.BO trades at ₹424.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas ARROWGREEN.BO's P/E ratio is 12.58. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to ARROWGREEN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check ARROWGREEN.BO's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, NAHARPOLY.NS has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while NAHARPOLY.NS trades at ₹243.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas NAHARPOLY.NS's P/E ratio is 8.25. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NAHARPOLY.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to NAHARPOLY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check NAHARPOLY.NS's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, NAHARPOLY.BO has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while NAHARPOLY.BO trades at ₹242.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas NAHARPOLY.BO's P/E ratio is 8.23. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NAHARPOLY.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to NAHARPOLY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check NAHARPOLY.BO's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, TPLPLASTEH.NS has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while TPLPLASTEH.NS trades at ₹71.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas TPLPLASTEH.NS's P/E ratio is 19.98. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TPLPLASTEH.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to TPLPLASTEH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check TPLPLASTEH.NS's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, PYRAMID.NS has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while PYRAMID.NS trades at ₹150.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas PYRAMID.NS's P/E ratio is 21.82. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PYRAMID.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to PYRAMID.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check PYRAMID.NS's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, PYRAMID.BO has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while PYRAMID.BO trades at ₹150.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas PYRAMID.BO's P/E ratio is 21.75. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PYRAMID.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to PYRAMID.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check PYRAMID.BO's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, HALDYNGL.BO has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while HALDYNGL.BO trades at ₹91.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas HALDYNGL.BO's P/E ratio is 23.86. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HALDYNGL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to HALDYNGL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check HALDYNGL.BO's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, KANPRPLA.NS has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while KANPRPLA.NS trades at ₹193.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas KANPRPLA.NS's P/E ratio is 15.52. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KANPRPLA.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to KANPRPLA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check KANPRPLA.NS's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, KANPRPLA.BO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while KANPRPLA.BO trades at ₹193.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas KANPRPLA.BO's P/E ratio is 15.50. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KANPRPLA.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to KANPRPLA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check KANPRPLA.BO's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, BBTCL.BO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while BBTCL.BO trades at ₹185.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas BBTCL.BO's P/E ratio is 29.46. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BBTCL.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to BBTCL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check BBTCL.BO's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, BBTCL.NS has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while BBTCL.NS trades at ₹180.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas BBTCL.NS's P/E ratio is 28.67. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BBTCL.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to BBTCL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check BBTCL.NS's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, KALYANI.BO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while KALYANI.BO trades at ₹470.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas KALYANI.BO's P/E ratio is 21.44. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KALYANI.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to KALYANI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check KALYANI.BO's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, RDBRL.BO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while RDBRL.BO trades at ₹162.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas RDBRL.BO's P/E ratio is 8.17. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RDBRL.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to RDBRL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check RDBRL.BO's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, SAH.BO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while SAH.BO trades at ₹106.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas SAH.BO's P/E ratio is 368.79. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SAH.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to SAH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check SAH.BO's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, SAH.NS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while SAH.NS trades at ₹104.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas SAH.NS's P/E ratio is 361.21. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SAH.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to SAH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check SAH.NS's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, BALAJEE.NS has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while BALAJEE.NS trades at ₹32.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas BALAJEE.NS's P/E ratio is 14.10. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BALAJEE.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to BALAJEE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check BALAJEE.NS's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, PGFOILQ.BO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while PGFOILQ.BO trades at ₹220.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas PGFOILQ.BO's P/E ratio is 36.99. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PGFOILQ.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to PGFOILQ.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check PGFOILQ.BO's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, HITECHCORP.BO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while HITECHCORP.BO trades at ₹149.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas HITECHCORP.BO's P/E ratio is 35.15. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HITECHCORP.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to HITECHCORP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check HITECHCORP.BO's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, HITECHCORP.NS has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while HITECHCORP.NS trades at ₹148.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas HITECHCORP.NS's P/E ratio is 34.87. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HITECHCORP.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to HITECHCORP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check HITECHCORP.NS's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, WORTH.NS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while WORTH.NS trades at ₹159.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas WORTH.NS's P/E ratio is 16.24. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WORTH.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to WORTH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check WORTH.NS's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, WORTHPERI.NS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while WORTHPERI.NS trades at ₹139.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas WORTHPERI.NS's P/E ratio is 13.61. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WORTHPERI.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to WORTHPERI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check WORTHPERI.NS's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, WORTHPERI.BO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while WORTHPERI.BO trades at ₹138.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas WORTHPERI.BO's P/E ratio is 13.44. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WORTHPERI.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to WORTHPERI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check WORTHPERI.BO's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, HPBL.BO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while HPBL.BO trades at ₹180.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas HPBL.BO's P/E ratio is 8.30. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HPBL.BO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to HPBL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check HPBL.BO's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, AERONEU.BO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while AERONEU.BO trades at ₹70.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas AERONEU.BO's P/E ratio is 92.30. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AERONEU.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is less volatile compared to AERONEU.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check AERONEU.BO's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, AERONEU.NS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while AERONEU.NS trades at ₹69.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas AERONEU.NS's P/E ratio is 91.11. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AERONEU.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to AERONEU.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check AERONEU.NS's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, EMMBI.BO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while EMMBI.BO trades at ₹91.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas EMMBI.BO's P/E ratio is 22.33. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EMMBI.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to EMMBI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check EMMBI.BO's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, EMMBI.NS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while EMMBI.NS trades at ₹90.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas EMMBI.NS's P/E ratio is 22.05. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EMMBI.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to EMMBI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check EMMBI.NS's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, EASTINDIA.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while EASTINDIA.BO trades at ₹112.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas EASTINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 35.30. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EASTINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to EASTINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check EASTINDIA.BO's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, ECOPLAST.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while ECOPLAST.BO trades at ₹447.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas ECOPLAST.BO's P/E ratio is 20.13. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ECOPLAST.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to ECOPLAST.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check ECOPLAST.BO's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, BI.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while BI.BO trades at ₹62.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas BI.BO's P/E ratio is -6.48. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BI.BO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to BI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check BI.BO's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, KAIRA.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while KAIRA.BO trades at ₹1,441.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas KAIRA.BO's P/E ratio is 41.82. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KAIRA.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to KAIRA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check KAIRA.BO's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, RPPL.NS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while RPPL.NS trades at ₹17.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas RPPL.NS's P/E ratio is 11.58. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RPPL.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to RPPL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check RPPL.NS's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, WORTH.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while WORTH.BO trades at ₹3.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas WORTH.BO's P/E ratio is 58.50. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WORTH.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to WORTH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check WORTH.BO's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, HINDTIN.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while HINDTIN.BO trades at ₹123.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas HINDTIN.BO's P/E ratio is 11.65. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HINDTIN.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to HINDTIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check HINDTIN.BO's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, CAPRIHANS.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while CAPRIHANS.BO trades at ₹81.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas CAPRIHANS.BO's P/E ratio is -2.41. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CAPRIHANS.BO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to CAPRIHANS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check CAPRIHANS.BO's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, BISIL.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while BISIL.BO trades at ₹2.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas BISIL.BO's P/E ratio is 5.92. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BISIL.BO's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to BISIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check BISIL.BO's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, SHETR.BO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while SHETR.BO trades at ₹111.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas SHETR.BO's P/E ratio is 30.52. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SHETR.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to SHETR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check SHETR.BO's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, CLARA.BO has a market cap of 975.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while CLARA.BO trades at ₹38.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas CLARA.BO's P/E ratio is 45.24. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CLARA.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to CLARA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check CLARA.BO's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, TOKYOPLAST.BO has a market cap of 931.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while TOKYOPLAST.BO trades at ₹98.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas TOKYOPLAST.BO's P/E ratio is 88.29. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TOKYOPLAST.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to TOKYOPLAST.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check TOKYOPLAST.BO's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, GUJCONT.BO has a market cap of 926.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while GUJCONT.BO trades at ₹163.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas GUJCONT.BO's P/E ratio is 13.85. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GUJCONT.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to GUJCONT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check GUJCONT.BO's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, TOKYOPLAST.NS has a market cap of 873.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while TOKYOPLAST.NS trades at ₹91.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas TOKYOPLAST.NS's P/E ratio is 82.86. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TOKYOPLAST.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to TOKYOPLAST.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check TOKYOPLAST.NS's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, SHALIWIR.BO has a market cap of 812.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while SHALIWIR.BO trades at ₹19.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas SHALIWIR.BO's P/E ratio is 21.59. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SHALIWIR.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to SHALIWIR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check SHALIWIR.BO's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, AMDIND.BO has a market cap of 807.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while AMDIND.BO trades at ₹42.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas AMDIND.BO's P/E ratio is -26.16. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AMDIND.BO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to AMDIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check AMDIND.BO's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, AMDIND.NS has a market cap of 803.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while AMDIND.NS trades at ₹41.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas AMDIND.NS's P/E ratio is -26.05. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AMDIND.NS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to AMDIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check AMDIND.NS's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, BAPACK.BO has a market cap of 801.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while BAPACK.BO trades at ₹161.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas BAPACK.BO's P/E ratio is 9.84. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BAPACK.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is less volatile compared to BAPACK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check BAPACK.BO's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, HINDNATGLS.NS has a market cap of 791.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while HINDNATGLS.NS trades at ₹8.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas HINDNATGLS.NS's P/E ratio is -4.31. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HINDNATGLS.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to HINDNATGLS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check HINDNATGLS.NS's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, ORIENTLTD.NS has a market cap of 630.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while ORIENTLTD.NS trades at ₹63.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas ORIENTLTD.NS's P/E ratio is -22.28. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ORIENTLTD.NS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to ORIENTLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check ORIENTLTD.NS's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, ORIENTLTD.BO has a market cap of 601.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while ORIENTLTD.BO trades at ₹60.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas ORIENTLTD.BO's P/E ratio is -21.24. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ORIENTLTD.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to ORIENTLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check ORIENTLTD.BO's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, BALKRISHNA.NS has a market cap of 538.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while BALKRISHNA.NS trades at ₹16.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas BALKRISHNA.NS's P/E ratio is -8.84. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BALKRISHNA.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to BALKRISHNA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check BALKRISHNA.NS's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, BALKRISHNA.BO has a market cap of 529.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while BALKRISHNA.BO trades at ₹16.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas BALKRISHNA.BO's P/E ratio is -8.69. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BALKRISHNA.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to BALKRISHNA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check BALKRISHNA.BO's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, PERFEPA.BO has a market cap of 524.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while PERFEPA.BO trades at ₹78.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas PERFEPA.BO's P/E ratio is 13.88. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PERFEPA.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is less volatile compared to PERFEPA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check PERFEPA.BO's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, GUJCRAFT.BO has a market cap of 522.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while GUJCRAFT.BO trades at ₹106.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas GUJCRAFT.BO's P/E ratio is 20.56. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GUJCRAFT.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to GUJCRAFT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check GUJCRAFT.BO's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, JUMBO.BO has a market cap of 507.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while JUMBO.BO trades at ₹60.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas JUMBO.BO's P/E ratio is 6.19. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JUMBO.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to JUMBO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check JUMBO.BO's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, SIEL.BO has a market cap of 507.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while SIEL.BO trades at ₹36.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas SIEL.BO's P/E ratio is 7.06. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SIEL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to SIEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check SIEL.BO's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, SPL.BO has a market cap of 478.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while SPL.BO trades at ₹24.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas SPL.BO's P/E ratio is 6.37. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SPL.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to SPL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check SPL.BO's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, INNOVTEC.BO has a market cap of 385.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while INNOVTEC.BO trades at ₹17.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas INNOVTEC.BO's P/E ratio is -13.50. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to INNOVTEC.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to INNOVTEC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check INNOVTEC.BO's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, PEARLPOLY.NS has a market cap of 316.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while PEARLPOLY.NS trades at ₹18.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas PEARLPOLY.NS's P/E ratio is -5.56. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PEARLPOLY.NS's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to PEARLPOLY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check PEARLPOLY.NS's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, PEARLPOLY.BO has a market cap of 315M. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while PEARLPOLY.BO trades at ₹18.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas PEARLPOLY.BO's P/E ratio is -5.54. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PEARLPOLY.BO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to PEARLPOLY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check PEARLPOLY.BO's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, RISHITECH.BO has a market cap of 301.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while RISHITECH.BO trades at ₹40.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas RISHITECH.BO's P/E ratio is 10.25. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RISHITECH.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to RISHITECH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check RISHITECH.BO's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, POLYSPIN.BO has a market cap of 299.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while POLYSPIN.BO trades at ₹29.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas POLYSPIN.BO's P/E ratio is 5.47. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to POLYSPIN.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to POLYSPIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check POLYSPIN.BO's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, RCAN.BO has a market cap of 257.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while RCAN.BO trades at ₹24.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas RCAN.BO's P/E ratio is 11.86. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RCAN.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to RCAN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check RCAN.BO's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, KSHITIJPOL.NS has a market cap of 246.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while KSHITIJPOL.NS trades at ₹2.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas KSHITIJPOL.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KSHITIJPOL.NS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to KSHITIJPOL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check KSHITIJPOL.NS's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, JAUSPOL.BO has a market cap of 161.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while JAUSPOL.BO trades at ₹34.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas JAUSPOL.BO's P/E ratio is 318.09. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JAUSPOL.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to JAUSPOL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check JAUSPOL.BO's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, TRANSFRE.BO has a market cap of 157.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while TRANSFRE.BO trades at ₹21.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas TRANSFRE.BO's P/E ratio is 9.19. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TRANSFRE.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to TRANSFRE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check TRANSFRE.BO's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, ANTGRAPHIC.NS has a market cap of 139.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while ANTGRAPHIC.NS trades at ₹0.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas ANTGRAPHIC.NS's P/E ratio is -30.00. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ANTGRAPHIC.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to ANTGRAPHIC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check ANTGRAPHIC.NS's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, RAJPACK.BO has a market cap of 138.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while RAJPACK.BO trades at ₹30.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas RAJPACK.BO's P/E ratio is -40.39. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RAJPACK.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to RAJPACK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check RAJPACK.BO's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, GKP.BO has a market cap of 135.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while GKP.BO trades at ₹6.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas GKP.BO's P/E ratio is 16.59. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GKP.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to GKP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check GKP.BO's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, ARROWHEAD.BO has a market cap of 131M. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while ARROWHEAD.BO trades at ₹70.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas ARROWHEAD.BO's P/E ratio is -32.26. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ARROWHEAD.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to ARROWHEAD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check ARROWHEAD.BO's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, TIRTPLS.BO has a market cap of 115.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while TIRTPLS.BO trades at ₹26.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas TIRTPLS.BO's P/E ratio is 50.00. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TIRTPLS.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to TIRTPLS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check TIRTPLS.BO's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, YASHRAJC.BO has a market cap of 91.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while YASHRAJC.BO trades at ₹5.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas YASHRAJC.BO's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to YASHRAJC.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to YASHRAJC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check YASHRAJC.BO's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, AADIIND.BO has a market cap of 86.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while AADIIND.BO trades at ₹8.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas AADIIND.BO's P/E ratio is -41.38. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AADIIND.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is more volatile compared to AADIIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check AADIIND.BO's competition here

ANUROOP.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ANUROOP.BO stands at 139.9M. In comparison, PROMACT.BO has a market cap of 74.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ANUROOP.BO is priced at ₹12.66, while PROMACT.BO trades at ₹11.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ANUROOP.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 3.53, whereas PROMACT.BO's P/E ratio is 142.50. In terms of profitability, ANUROOP.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PROMACT.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ANUROOP.BO is less volatile compared to PROMACT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANUROOP.BO.Check PROMACT.BO's competition here