Ardagh Metal Packaging S.A.
Ardagh Metal Packaging S.A. (AMBP) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (AMBP) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaging & Containers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMBP | $4.19 | +1.82% | 2.4B | -204.75 | -$0.02 | +9.79% |
| BLL | $69.49 | -3.37% | 21.8B | 28.62 | $2.43 | +1.08% |
| SW | $39.45 | -0.67% | 20.8B | 29.89 | $1.33 | +4.36% |
| IP | $37.73 | +5.82% | 19.7B | -6.65 | -$5.61 | +4.97% |
| PKG | $215.90 | +0.87% | 19.3B | 25.02 | $8.57 | +2.33% |
| AMCR | $40.73 | +0.98% | 18.7B | 30.50 | $1.33 | +6.32% |
| BALL | $62.11 | +0.68% | 16.7B | 18.85 | $3.30 | +1.29% |
| WRK | $51.51 | +3.54% | 13.3B | 42.57 | $1.21 | +2.30% |
| CCK | $106.03 | +1.82% | 12.1B | 16.48 | $6.38 | +0.99% |
| BERY | $67.58 | -2.93% | 7.8B | 14.95 | $4.52 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
AMBP vs BLL Comparison March 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, BLL has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $4.19, while BLL trades at $69.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -204.75, whereas BLL's P/E ratio is 28.62. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BLL's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is less volatile compared to BLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check BLL's competition here
AMBP vs SW Comparison March 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SW has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $4.19, while SW trades at $39.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -204.75, whereas SW's P/E ratio is 29.89. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is more volatile compared to SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check SW's competition here
AMBP vs IP Comparison March 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, IP has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $4.19, while IP trades at $37.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -204.75, whereas IP's P/E ratio is -6.65. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to IP's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is more volatile compared to IP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check IP's competition here
AMBP vs PKG Comparison March 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, PKG has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $4.19, while PKG trades at $215.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -204.75, whereas PKG's P/E ratio is 25.02. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PKG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is more volatile compared to PKG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check PKG's competition here
AMBP vs AMCR Comparison March 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, AMCR has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $4.19, while AMCR trades at $40.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -204.75, whereas AMCR's P/E ratio is 30.50. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AMCR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is more volatile compared to AMCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check AMCR's competition here
AMBP vs BALL Comparison March 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, BALL has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $4.19, while BALL trades at $62.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -204.75, whereas BALL's P/E ratio is 18.85. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BALL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is more volatile compared to BALL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check BALL's competition here
AMBP vs WRK Comparison March 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, WRK has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $4.19, while WRK trades at $51.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -204.75, whereas WRK's P/E ratio is 42.57. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to WRK's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is less volatile compared to WRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check WRK's competition here
AMBP vs CCK Comparison March 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, CCK has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $4.19, while CCK trades at $106.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -204.75, whereas CCK's P/E ratio is 16.48. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CCK's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is more volatile compared to CCK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check CCK's competition here
AMBP vs BERY Comparison March 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, BERY has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $4.19, while BERY trades at $67.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -204.75, whereas BERY's P/E ratio is 14.95. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BERY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is less volatile compared to BERY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check BERY's competition here
AMBP vs SEE Comparison March 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SEE has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $4.19, while SEE trades at $41.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -204.75, whereas SEE's P/E ratio is 13.99. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SEE's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is more volatile compared to SEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check SEE's competition here
AMBP vs SON Comparison March 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SON has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $4.19, while SON trades at $53.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -204.75, whereas SON's P/E ratio is 8.99. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SON's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is more volatile compared to SON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check SON's competition here
AMBP vs REYN Comparison March 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, REYN has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $4.19, while REYN trades at $21.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -204.75, whereas REYN's P/E ratio is 15.01. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to REYN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is more volatile compared to REYN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check REYN's competition here
AMBP vs SLGN Comparison March 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SLGN has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $4.19, while SLGN trades at $42.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -204.75, whereas SLGN's P/E ratio is 15.42. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SLGN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is more volatile compared to SLGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check SLGN's competition here
AMBP vs GEF-B Comparison March 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, GEF-B has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $4.19, while GEF-B trades at $81.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -204.75, whereas GEF-B's P/E ratio is 22.47. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GEF-B's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is less volatile compared to GEF-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check GEF-B's competition here
AMBP vs PTVE Comparison March 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, PTVE has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $4.19, while PTVE trades at $18.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -204.75, whereas PTVE's P/E ratio is -23.39. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PTVE's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is more volatile compared to PTVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check PTVE's competition here
AMBP vs GEF Comparison March 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, GEF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $4.19, while GEF trades at $66.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -204.75, whereas GEF's P/E ratio is 27.86. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GEF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is more volatile compared to GEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check GEF's competition here
AMBP vs GPK Comparison March 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, GPK has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $4.19, while GPK trades at $9.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -204.75, whereas GPK's P/E ratio is 6.56. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GPK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is more volatile compared to GPK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check GPK's competition here
AMBP vs OI Comparison March 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, OI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $4.19, while OI trades at $10.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -204.75, whereas OI's P/E ratio is -12.65. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to OI's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is less volatile compared to OI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check OI's competition here
AMBP vs TRS Comparison March 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, TRS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $4.19, while TRS trades at $35.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -204.75, whereas TRS's P/E ratio is 19.69. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TRS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is more volatile compared to TRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check TRS's competition here
AMBP vs MYE Comparison March 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, MYE has a market cap of 774.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $4.19, while MYE trades at $20.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -204.75, whereas MYE's P/E ratio is 22.26. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MYE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is more volatile compared to MYE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check MYE's competition here
AMBP vs FFHL Comparison March 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, FFHL has a market cap of 695.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $4.19, while FFHL trades at $8.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -204.75, whereas FFHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FFHL's ROE of -46.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is more volatile compared to FFHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check FFHL's competition here
AMBP vs KRT Comparison March 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, KRT has a market cap of 541.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $4.19, while KRT trades at $27.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -204.75, whereas KRT's P/E ratio is 17.95. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to KRT's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is less volatile compared to KRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check KRT's competition here
AMBP vs PACK Comparison March 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, PACK has a market cap of 290.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $4.19, while PACK trades at $3.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -204.75, whereas PACK's P/E ratio is -7.78. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PACK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is less volatile compared to PACK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check PACK's competition here
AMBP vs OCTO Comparison March 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, OCTO has a market cap of 25.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $4.19, while OCTO trades at $8.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -204.75, whereas OCTO's P/E ratio is -1.48. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to OCTO's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is less volatile compared to OCTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check OCTO's competition here
AMBP vs TUP Comparison March 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, TUP has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $4.19, while TUP trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -204.75, whereas TUP's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TUP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is less volatile compared to TUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check TUP's competition here
AMBP vs MGIH Comparison March 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, MGIH has a market cap of 16.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $4.19, while MGIH trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -204.75, whereas MGIH's P/E ratio is -2.59. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MGIH's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is more volatile compared to MGIH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check MGIH's competition here
AMBP vs YHGJ Comparison March 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, YHGJ has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $4.19, while YHGJ trades at $3.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -204.75, whereas YHGJ's P/E ratio is -11.44. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to YHGJ's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is less volatile compared to YHGJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check YHGJ's competition here
AMBP vs DSS Comparison March 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, DSS has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $4.19, while DSS trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -204.75, whereas DSS's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to DSS's ROE of -2.48%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is less volatile compared to DSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check DSS's competition here
AMBP vs TYDE Comparison March 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, TYDE has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $4.19, while TYDE trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -204.75, whereas TYDE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TYDE's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is less volatile compared to TYDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check TYDE's competition here
AMBP vs ARD Comparison March 2026
AMBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBP stands at 2.4B. In comparison, ARD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AMBP is priced at $4.19, while ARD trades at $24.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBP currently has a P/E ratio of -204.75, whereas ARD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMBP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ARD's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBP is less volatile compared to ARD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBP.Check ARD's competition here