Ambac Financial Group, Inc.
Ambac Financial Group, Inc. (AMBC) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (AMBC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMBC | $8.54 | +3.02% | 322.6M | -11.21 | -$0.62 | N/A |
| FNF | $58.17 | +0.43% | 16B | 14.83 | $3.93 | +3.39% |
| RYAN | $57.37 | -3.66% | 15.4B | 139.30 | $0.42 | +0.78% |
| AIZ | $210.04 | +4.08% | 10.3B | 14.73 | $13.80 | +1.53% |
| FAF | $62.66 | +0.19% | 6.4B | 34.45 | $1.82 | +3.44% |
| MTG | $27.03 | +2.15% | 6.3B | 8.91 | $3.05 | +1.98% |
| ESNT | $57.85 | +1.46% | 6.1B | 8.81 | $6.84 | +1.96% |
| ACT | $36.20 | +0.81% | 5.5B | 8.42 | $4.41 | +2.06% |
| RDN | $33.47 | +0.54% | 4.6B | 8.63 | $3.94 | +2.94% |
| AGO | $86.17 | +2.05% | 4B | 9.74 | $8.42 | +1.58% |
Stock Comparison
AMBC vs FNF Comparison August 2025
AMBC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBC stands at 322.6M. In comparison, FNF has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBC is priced at $8.54, while FNF trades at $58.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBC currently has a P/E ratio of -11.21, whereas FNF's P/E ratio is 14.83. In terms of profitability, AMBC's ROE is -0.55%, compared to FNF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBC is more volatile compared to FNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBC.Check FNF's competition here
AMBC vs RYAN Comparison August 2025
AMBC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBC stands at 322.6M. In comparison, RYAN has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBC is priced at $8.54, while RYAN trades at $57.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBC currently has a P/E ratio of -11.21, whereas RYAN's P/E ratio is 139.30. In terms of profitability, AMBC's ROE is -0.55%, compared to RYAN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBC is more volatile compared to RYAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBC.Check RYAN's competition here
AMBC vs AIZ Comparison August 2025
AMBC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBC stands at 322.6M. In comparison, AIZ has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBC is priced at $8.54, while AIZ trades at $210.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBC currently has a P/E ratio of -11.21, whereas AIZ's P/E ratio is 14.73. In terms of profitability, AMBC's ROE is -0.55%, compared to AIZ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBC is less volatile compared to AIZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBC.Check AIZ's competition here
AMBC vs FAF Comparison August 2025
AMBC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBC stands at 322.6M. In comparison, FAF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBC is priced at $8.54, while FAF trades at $62.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBC currently has a P/E ratio of -11.21, whereas FAF's P/E ratio is 34.45. In terms of profitability, AMBC's ROE is -0.55%, compared to FAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBC is more volatile compared to FAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBC.Check FAF's competition here
AMBC vs MTG Comparison August 2025
AMBC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBC stands at 322.6M. In comparison, MTG has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBC is priced at $8.54, while MTG trades at $27.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBC currently has a P/E ratio of -11.21, whereas MTG's P/E ratio is 8.91. In terms of profitability, AMBC's ROE is -0.55%, compared to MTG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBC is more volatile compared to MTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBC.Check MTG's competition here
AMBC vs ESNT Comparison August 2025
AMBC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBC stands at 322.6M. In comparison, ESNT has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBC is priced at $8.54, while ESNT trades at $57.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBC currently has a P/E ratio of -11.21, whereas ESNT's P/E ratio is 8.81. In terms of profitability, AMBC's ROE is -0.55%, compared to ESNT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBC is more volatile compared to ESNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBC.Check ESNT's competition here
AMBC vs ACT Comparison August 2025
AMBC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBC stands at 322.6M. In comparison, ACT has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBC is priced at $8.54, while ACT trades at $36.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBC currently has a P/E ratio of -11.21, whereas ACT's P/E ratio is 8.42. In terms of profitability, AMBC's ROE is -0.55%, compared to ACT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBC is more volatile compared to ACT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBC.Check ACT's competition here
AMBC vs RDN Comparison August 2025
AMBC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBC stands at 322.6M. In comparison, RDN has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBC is priced at $8.54, while RDN trades at $33.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBC currently has a P/E ratio of -11.21, whereas RDN's P/E ratio is 8.63. In terms of profitability, AMBC's ROE is -0.55%, compared to RDN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBC is more volatile compared to RDN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBC.Check RDN's competition here
AMBC vs AGO Comparison August 2025
AMBC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBC stands at 322.6M. In comparison, AGO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBC is priced at $8.54, while AGO trades at $86.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBC currently has a P/E ratio of -11.21, whereas AGO's P/E ratio is 9.74. In terms of profitability, AMBC's ROE is -0.55%, compared to AGO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBC is more volatile compared to AGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBC.Check AGO's competition here
AMBC vs NMIH Comparison August 2025
AMBC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBC stands at 322.6M. In comparison, NMIH has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBC is priced at $8.54, while NMIH trades at $38.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBC currently has a P/E ratio of -11.21, whereas NMIH's P/E ratio is 8.28. In terms of profitability, AMBC's ROE is -0.55%, compared to NMIH's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBC is more volatile compared to NMIH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBC.Check NMIH's competition here
AMBC vs TRUP Comparison August 2025
AMBC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBC stands at 322.6M. In comparison, TRUP has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBC is priced at $8.54, while TRUP trades at $48.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBC currently has a P/E ratio of -11.21, whereas TRUP's P/E ratio is -488.10. In terms of profitability, AMBC's ROE is -0.55%, compared to TRUP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBC is less volatile compared to TRUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBC.Check TRUP's competition here
AMBC vs EIG Comparison August 2025
AMBC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBC stands at 322.6M. In comparison, EIG has a market cap of 968.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBC is priced at $8.54, while EIG trades at $41.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBC currently has a P/E ratio of -11.21, whereas EIG's P/E ratio is 10.23. In terms of profitability, AMBC's ROE is -0.55%, compared to EIG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBC is less volatile compared to EIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBC.Check EIG's competition here
AMBC vs AMSF Comparison August 2025
AMBC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBC stands at 322.6M. In comparison, AMSF has a market cap of 850.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBC is priced at $8.54, while AMSF trades at $44.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBC currently has a P/E ratio of -11.21, whereas AMSF's P/E ratio is 17.03. In terms of profitability, AMBC's ROE is -0.55%, compared to AMSF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBC is more volatile compared to AMSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBC.Check AMSF's competition here
AMBC vs TIPT Comparison August 2025
AMBC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBC stands at 322.6M. In comparison, TIPT has a market cap of 813M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBC is priced at $8.54, while TIPT trades at $20.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBC currently has a P/E ratio of -11.21, whereas TIPT's P/E ratio is 16.94. In terms of profitability, AMBC's ROE is -0.55%, compared to TIPT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBC is less volatile compared to TIPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBC.Check TIPT's competition here
AMBC vs HIPO Comparison August 2025
AMBC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBC stands at 322.6M. In comparison, HIPO has a market cap of 721.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBC is priced at $8.54, while HIPO trades at $31.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBC currently has a P/E ratio of -11.21, whereas HIPO's P/E ratio is -75.89. In terms of profitability, AMBC's ROE is -0.55%, compared to HIPO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBC is less volatile compared to HIPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBC.Check HIPO's competition here
AMBC vs ITIC Comparison August 2025
AMBC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBC stands at 322.6M. In comparison, ITIC has a market cap of 417.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBC is priced at $8.54, while ITIC trades at $224.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBC currently has a P/E ratio of -11.21, whereas ITIC's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, AMBC's ROE is -0.55%, compared to ITIC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBC is less volatile compared to ITIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBC.Check ITIC's competition here
AMBC vs MBI Comparison August 2025
AMBC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBC stands at 322.6M. In comparison, MBI has a market cap of 294.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBC is priced at $8.54, while MBI trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBC currently has a P/E ratio of -11.21, whereas MBI's P/E ratio is -1.29. In terms of profitability, AMBC's ROE is -0.55%, compared to MBI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBC is less volatile compared to MBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBC.Check MBI's competition here
AMBC vs JRVR Comparison August 2025
AMBC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBC stands at 322.6M. In comparison, JRVR has a market cap of 257.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBC is priced at $8.54, while JRVR trades at $5.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBC currently has a P/E ratio of -11.21, whereas JRVR's P/E ratio is -1.77. In terms of profitability, AMBC's ROE is -0.55%, compared to JRVR's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBC is less volatile compared to JRVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBC.Check JRVR's competition here
AMBC vs ICCH Comparison August 2025
AMBC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBC stands at 322.6M. In comparison, ICCH has a market cap of 69.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBC is priced at $8.54, while ICCH trades at $23.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBC currently has a P/E ratio of -11.21, whereas ICCH's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, AMBC's ROE is -0.55%, compared to ICCH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBC is more volatile compared to ICCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBC.Check ICCH's competition here
AMBC vs AIFU Comparison August 2025
AMBC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBC stands at 322.6M. In comparison, AIFU has a market cap of 21.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBC is priced at $8.54, while AIFU trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBC currently has a P/E ratio of -11.21, whereas AIFU's P/E ratio is 0.32. In terms of profitability, AMBC's ROE is -0.55%, compared to AIFU's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBC is less volatile compared to AIFU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBC.Check AIFU's competition here
AMBC vs AMBC-WT Comparison August 2025
AMBC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBC stands at 322.6M. In comparison, AMBC-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AMBC is priced at $8.54, while AMBC-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBC currently has a P/E ratio of -11.21, whereas AMBC-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMBC's ROE is -0.55%, compared to AMBC-WT's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBC is less volatile compared to AMBC-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBC.Check AMBC-WT's competition here
AMBC vs TIG Comparison August 2025
AMBC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBC stands at 322.6M. In comparison, TIG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AMBC is priced at $8.54, while TIG trades at $6.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBC currently has a P/E ratio of -11.21, whereas TIG's P/E ratio is -4.78. In terms of profitability, AMBC's ROE is -0.55%, compared to TIG's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBC is more volatile compared to TIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBC.Check TIG's competition here
AMBC vs PROS Comparison August 2025
AMBC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBC stands at 322.6M. In comparison, PROS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AMBC is priced at $8.54, while PROS trades at $12.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBC currently has a P/E ratio of -11.21, whereas PROS's P/E ratio is 2.03. In terms of profitability, AMBC's ROE is -0.55%, compared to PROS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBC is more volatile compared to PROS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBC.Check PROS's competition here