AIX Inc.
AIX Inc. AIFU Peers
See (AIFU) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AIFU | $6.04 | +3.42% | 17.5M | 0.26 | $23.40 | N/A |
| FNF | $56.06 | -0.83% | 15.4B | 13.91 | $4.03 | +3.52% |
| AIZ | $197.49 | +0.33% | 10B | 15.40 | $12.82 | +1.58% |
| RYAN | $67.99 | +0.61% | 8.6B | 188.83 | $0.36 | +0.68% |
| MTG | $27.84 | +0.61% | 6.6B | 9.28 | $3.00 | +1.87% |
| FAF | $61.39 | +0.26% | 6.3B | 40.39 | $1.52 | +3.52% |
| ESNT | $60.73 | +0.15% | 6.2B | 8.88 | $6.84 | +1.94% |
| ACT | $37.15 | +1.01% | 5.6B | 8.37 | $4.44 | +2.06% |
| RDN | $36.02 | +0.19% | 4.8B | 9.19 | $3.92 | +2.77% |
| AGO | $87.10 | -0.51% | 4.3B | 10.34 | $8.42 | +1.49% |
Stock Comparison
AIFU vs FNF Comparison
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 17.5M. In comparison, FNF has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $6.04, while FNF trades at $56.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas FNF's P/E ratio is 13.91. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FNF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to FNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.
AIFU vs AIZ Comparison
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 17.5M. In comparison, AIZ has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $6.04, while AIZ trades at $197.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas AIZ's P/E ratio is 15.40. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AIZ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to AIZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.
AIFU vs RYAN Comparison
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 17.5M. In comparison, RYAN has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $6.04, while RYAN trades at $67.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas RYAN's P/E ratio is 188.83. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RYAN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to RYAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.
AIFU vs MTG Comparison
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 17.5M. In comparison, MTG has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $6.04, while MTG trades at $27.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas MTG's P/E ratio is 9.28. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MTG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to MTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.
AIFU vs FAF Comparison
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 17.5M. In comparison, FAF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $6.04, while FAF trades at $61.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas FAF's P/E ratio is 40.39. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FAF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to FAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.
AIFU vs ESNT Comparison
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 17.5M. In comparison, ESNT has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $6.04, while ESNT trades at $60.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas ESNT's P/E ratio is 8.88. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ESNT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to ESNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.
AIFU vs ACT Comparison
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 17.5M. In comparison, ACT has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $6.04, while ACT trades at $37.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas ACT's P/E ratio is 8.37. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ACT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to ACT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.
AIFU vs RDN Comparison
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 17.5M. In comparison, RDN has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $6.04, while RDN trades at $36.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas RDN's P/E ratio is 9.19. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RDN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to RDN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.
AIFU vs AGO Comparison
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 17.5M. In comparison, AGO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $6.04, while AGO trades at $87.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas AGO's P/E ratio is 10.34. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AGO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to AGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.
AIFU vs NMIH Comparison
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 17.5M. In comparison, NMIH has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $6.04, while NMIH trades at $42.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas NMIH's P/E ratio is 9.11. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NMIH's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to NMIH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.
AIFU vs TRUP Comparison
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 17.5M. In comparison, TRUP has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $6.04, while TRUP trades at $55.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas TRUP's P/E ratio is -553.50. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TRUP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to TRUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.
AIFU vs EIG Comparison
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 17.5M. In comparison, EIG has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $6.04, while EIG trades at $47.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas EIG's P/E ratio is 11.45. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EIG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to EIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.
AIFU vs TIPT Comparison
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 17.5M. In comparison, TIPT has a market cap of 884.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $6.04, while TIPT trades at $23.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas TIPT's P/E ratio is 19.49. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TIPT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to TIPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.
AIFU vs AMSF Comparison
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 17.5M. In comparison, AMSF has a market cap of 833.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $6.04, while AMSF trades at $43.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas AMSF's P/E ratio is 17.63. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AMSF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to AMSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.
AIFU vs HIPO Comparison
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 17.5M. In comparison, HIPO has a market cap of 701.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $6.04, while HIPO trades at $27.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas HIPO's P/E ratio is -13.41. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HIPO's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to HIPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.
AIFU vs ITIC Comparison
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 17.5M. In comparison, ITIC has a market cap of 398.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $6.04, while ITIC trades at $211.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas ITIC's P/E ratio is 13.47. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ITIC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to ITIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.
AIFU vs AMBC Comparison
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 17.5M. In comparison, AMBC has a market cap of 330.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $6.04, while AMBC trades at $7.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas AMBC's P/E ratio is -11.47. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AMBC's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to AMBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.
AIFU vs JRVR Comparison
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 17.5M. In comparison, JRVR has a market cap of 268.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $6.04, while JRVR trades at $5.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas JRVR's P/E ratio is -1.99. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is +0.20%, compared to JRVR's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to JRVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.
AIFU vs MBI Comparison
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 17.5M. In comparison, MBI has a market cap of 218.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $6.04, while MBI trades at $4.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas MBI's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MBI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to MBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.
AIFU vs ICCH Comparison
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 17.5M. In comparison, ICCH has a market cap of 69.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $6.04, while ICCH trades at $23.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas ICCH's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ICCH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to ICCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.
AIFU vs TIG Comparison
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 17.5M. In comparison, TIG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $6.04, while TIG trades at $6.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas TIG's P/E ratio is -4.78. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TIG's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to TIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.
AIFU vs AMBC-WT Comparison
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 17.5M. In comparison, AMBC-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $6.04, while AMBC-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas AMBC-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AMBC-WT's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is less volatile compared to AMBC-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.
AIFU vs PROS Comparison
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 17.5M. In comparison, PROS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $6.04, while PROS trades at $12.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.26, whereas PROS's P/E ratio is 2.03. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PROS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to PROS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.