AIFU Inc.
AIFU Inc. (AIFU) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (AIFU) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AIFU | $1.90 | +0.05% | 220.3M | 0.16 | $11.71 | N/A |
| FNF | $50.08 | -1.34% | 13.6B | 22.71 | $2.21 | +4.06% |
| AIZ | $222.91 | -1.88% | 11.2B | 13.18 | $16.92 | +1.51% |
| FAF | $67.60 | -2.07% | 6.9B | 11.27 | $6.00 | +3.23% |
| ACT | $41.44 | +0.07% | 6B | 9.17 | $4.52 | +2.02% |
| MTG | $26.52 | -0.97% | 5.7B | 8.47 | $3.13 | +2.18% |
| ESNT | $59.11 | -0.67% | 5.7B | 8.57 | $6.90 | +2.09% |
| RYAN | $39.72 | +0.97% | 5.2B | 84.55 | $0.47 | +1.24% |
| RDN | $33.90 | -0.94% | 4.6B | 7.72 | $4.39 | +3.01% |
| AGO | $85.31 | -1.60% | 3.9B | 10.46 | $8.16 | +1.63% |
Stock Comparison
AIFU vs FNF Comparison March 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 220.3M. In comparison, FNF has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $1.90, while FNF trades at $50.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.16, whereas FNF's P/E ratio is 22.71. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FNF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is less volatile compared to FNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check FNF's competition here
AIFU vs AIZ Comparison March 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 220.3M. In comparison, AIZ has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $1.90, while AIZ trades at $222.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.16, whereas AIZ's P/E ratio is 13.18. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AIZ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is less volatile compared to AIZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check AIZ's competition here
AIFU vs FAF Comparison March 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 220.3M. In comparison, FAF has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $1.90, while FAF trades at $67.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.16, whereas FAF's P/E ratio is 11.27. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is less volatile compared to FAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check FAF's competition here
AIFU vs ACT Comparison March 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 220.3M. In comparison, ACT has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $1.90, while ACT trades at $41.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.16, whereas ACT's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ACT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is less volatile compared to ACT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check ACT's competition here
AIFU vs MTG Comparison March 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 220.3M. In comparison, MTG has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $1.90, while MTG trades at $26.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.16, whereas MTG's P/E ratio is 8.47. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MTG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is less volatile compared to MTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check MTG's competition here
AIFU vs ESNT Comparison March 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 220.3M. In comparison, ESNT has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $1.90, while ESNT trades at $59.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.16, whereas ESNT's P/E ratio is 8.57. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ESNT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is less volatile compared to ESNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check ESNT's competition here
AIFU vs RYAN Comparison March 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 220.3M. In comparison, RYAN has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $1.90, while RYAN trades at $39.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.16, whereas RYAN's P/E ratio is 84.55. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RYAN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is less volatile compared to RYAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check RYAN's competition here
AIFU vs RDN Comparison March 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 220.3M. In comparison, RDN has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $1.90, while RDN trades at $33.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.16, whereas RDN's P/E ratio is 7.72. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RDN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is less volatile compared to RDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check RDN's competition here
AIFU vs AGO Comparison March 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 220.3M. In comparison, AGO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $1.90, while AGO trades at $85.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.16, whereas AGO's P/E ratio is 10.46. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AGO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is less volatile compared to AGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check AGO's competition here
AIFU vs NMIH Comparison March 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 220.3M. In comparison, NMIH has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $1.90, while NMIH trades at $38.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.16, whereas NMIH's P/E ratio is 7.78. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NMIH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is less volatile compared to NMIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check NMIH's competition here
AIFU vs TRUP Comparison March 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 220.3M. In comparison, TRUP has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $1.90, while TRUP trades at $27.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.16, whereas TRUP's P/E ratio is 59.65. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TRUP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is less volatile compared to TRUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check TRUP's competition here
AIFU vs EIG Comparison March 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 220.3M. In comparison, EIG has a market cap of 943.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $1.90, while EIG trades at $40.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.16, whereas EIG's P/E ratio is 87.74. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EIG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is less volatile compared to EIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check EIG's competition here
AIFU vs HIPO Comparison March 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 220.3M. In comparison, HIPO has a market cap of 668.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $1.90, while HIPO trades at $26.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.16, whereas HIPO's P/E ratio is 6.99. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HIPO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is less volatile compared to HIPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check HIPO's competition here
AIFU vs AMSF Comparison March 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 220.3M. In comparison, AMSF has a market cap of 652.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $1.90, while AMSF trades at $34.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.16, whereas AMSF's P/E ratio is 13.22. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AMSF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is less volatile compared to AMSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check AMSF's competition here
AIFU vs TIPT Comparison March 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 220.3M. In comparison, TIPT has a market cap of 643.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $1.90, while TIPT trades at $17.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.16, whereas TIPT's P/E ratio is 14.79. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TIPT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is less volatile compared to TIPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check TIPT's competition here
AIFU vs ITIC Comparison March 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 220.3M. In comparison, ITIC has a market cap of 428.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $1.90, while ITIC trades at $227.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.16, whereas ITIC's P/E ratio is 12.23. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ITIC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is less volatile compared to ITIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check ITIC's competition here
AIFU vs AMBC Comparison March 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 220.3M. In comparison, AMBC has a market cap of 397.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $1.90, while AMBC trades at $8.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.16, whereas AMBC's P/E ratio is -8.46. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AMBC's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is less volatile compared to AMBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check AMBC's competition here
AIFU vs MBI Comparison March 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 220.3M. In comparison, MBI has a market cap of 332.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $1.90, while MBI trades at $6.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.16, whereas MBI's P/E ratio is -1.83. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MBI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is less volatile compared to MBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check MBI's competition here
AIFU vs JRVR Comparison March 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 220.3M. In comparison, JRVR has a market cap of 297.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $1.90, while JRVR trades at $6.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.16, whereas JRVR's P/E ratio is -3.02. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is +0.20%, compared to JRVR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is less volatile compared to JRVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check JRVR's competition here
AIFU vs OSG Comparison March 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 220.3M. In comparison, OSG has a market cap of 245.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $1.90, while OSG trades at $5.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.16, whereas OSG's P/E ratio is -2.21. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OSG's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is less volatile compared to OSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check OSG's competition here
AIFU vs ICCH Comparison March 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 220.3M. In comparison, ICCH has a market cap of 69.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $1.90, while ICCH trades at $23.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.16, whereas ICCH's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ICCH's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to ICCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check ICCH's competition here
AIFU vs FBDC Comparison March 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 220.3M. In comparison, FBDC has a market cap of 38.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $1.90, while FBDC trades at $17.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.16, whereas FBDC's P/E ratio is 9.26. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FBDC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to FBDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check FBDC's competition here
AIFU vs TIG Comparison March 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 220.3M. In comparison, TIG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $1.90, while TIG trades at $6.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.16, whereas TIG's P/E ratio is -4.78. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TIG's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to TIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check TIG's competition here
AIFU vs AMBC-WT Comparison March 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 220.3M. In comparison, AMBC-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $1.90, while AMBC-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.16, whereas AMBC-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AMBC-WT's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is less volatile compared to AMBC-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check AMBC-WT's competition here
AIFU vs PROS Comparison March 2026
AIFU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIFU stands at 220.3M. In comparison, PROS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AIFU is priced at $1.90, while PROS trades at $12.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIFU currently has a P/E ratio of 0.16, whereas PROS's P/E ratio is 2.03. In terms of profitability, AIFU's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PROS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AIFU is more volatile compared to PROS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIFU.Check PROS's competition here