Assured Guaranty Ltd.

AGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGO stands at 3.9B. In comparison, FNF has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AGO is priced at $85.31, while FNF trades at $50.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.46, whereas FNF's P/E ratio is 22.71. In terms of profitability, AGO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FNF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AGO is less volatile compared to FNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGO.Check FNF's competition here

AGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGO stands at 3.9B. In comparison, AIZ has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AGO is priced at $85.31, while AIZ trades at $222.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.46, whereas AIZ's P/E ratio is 13.18. In terms of profitability, AGO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AIZ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AGO is more volatile compared to AIZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGO.Check AIZ's competition here

AGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGO stands at 3.9B. In comparison, FAF has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AGO is priced at $85.31, while FAF trades at $67.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.46, whereas FAF's P/E ratio is 11.27. In terms of profitability, AGO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AGO is less volatile compared to FAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGO.Check FAF's competition here

AGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGO stands at 3.9B. In comparison, ACT has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, AGO is priced at $85.31, while ACT trades at $41.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.46, whereas ACT's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, AGO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ACT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AGO is less volatile compared to ACT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGO.Check ACT's competition here

AGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGO stands at 3.9B. In comparison, MTG has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AGO is priced at $85.31, while MTG trades at $26.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.46, whereas MTG's P/E ratio is 8.47. In terms of profitability, AGO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MTG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AGO is less volatile compared to MTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGO.Check MTG's competition here

AGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGO stands at 3.9B. In comparison, ESNT has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AGO is priced at $85.31, while ESNT trades at $59.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.46, whereas ESNT's P/E ratio is 8.57. In terms of profitability, AGO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ESNT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AGO is less volatile compared to ESNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGO.Check ESNT's competition here

AGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGO stands at 3.9B. In comparison, RYAN has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AGO is priced at $85.31, while RYAN trades at $39.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.46, whereas RYAN's P/E ratio is 84.55. In terms of profitability, AGO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RYAN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AGO is less volatile compared to RYAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGO.Check RYAN's competition here

AGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGO stands at 3.9B. In comparison, RDN has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AGO is priced at $85.31, while RDN trades at $33.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.46, whereas RDN's P/E ratio is 7.72. In terms of profitability, AGO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RDN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AGO is less volatile compared to RDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGO.Check RDN's competition here

AGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGO stands at 3.9B. In comparison, NMIH has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AGO is priced at $85.31, while NMIH trades at $38.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.46, whereas NMIH's P/E ratio is 7.78. In terms of profitability, AGO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NMIH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AGO is less volatile compared to NMIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGO.Check NMIH's competition here

AGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGO stands at 3.9B. In comparison, TRUP has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AGO is priced at $85.31, while TRUP trades at $27.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.46, whereas TRUP's P/E ratio is 59.65. In terms of profitability, AGO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TRUP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AGO is less volatile compared to TRUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGO.Check TRUP's competition here

AGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGO stands at 3.9B. In comparison, EIG has a market cap of 943.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AGO is priced at $85.31, while EIG trades at $40.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.46, whereas EIG's P/E ratio is 87.74. In terms of profitability, AGO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EIG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AGO is less volatile compared to EIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGO.Check EIG's competition here

AGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGO stands at 3.9B. In comparison, HIPO has a market cap of 668.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AGO is priced at $85.31, while HIPO trades at $26.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.46, whereas HIPO's P/E ratio is 6.99. In terms of profitability, AGO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HIPO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AGO is less volatile compared to HIPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGO.Check HIPO's competition here

AGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGO stands at 3.9B. In comparison, AMSF has a market cap of 652.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AGO is priced at $85.31, while AMSF trades at $34.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.46, whereas AMSF's P/E ratio is 13.22. In terms of profitability, AGO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AMSF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AGO is more volatile compared to AMSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGO.Check AMSF's competition here

AGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGO stands at 3.9B. In comparison, TIPT has a market cap of 643.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AGO is priced at $85.31, while TIPT trades at $17.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.46, whereas TIPT's P/E ratio is 14.79. In terms of profitability, AGO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TIPT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AGO is less volatile compared to TIPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGO.Check TIPT's competition here

AGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGO stands at 3.9B. In comparison, ITIC has a market cap of 428.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AGO is priced at $85.31, while ITIC trades at $227.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.46, whereas ITIC's P/E ratio is 12.23. In terms of profitability, AGO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ITIC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AGO is less volatile compared to ITIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGO.Check ITIC's competition here

AGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGO stands at 3.9B. In comparison, AMBC has a market cap of 397.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AGO is priced at $85.31, while AMBC trades at $8.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.46, whereas AMBC's P/E ratio is -8.46. In terms of profitability, AGO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AMBC's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, AGO is more volatile compared to AMBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGO.Check AMBC's competition here

AGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGO stands at 3.9B. In comparison, MBI has a market cap of 332.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AGO is priced at $85.31, while MBI trades at $6.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.46, whereas MBI's P/E ratio is -1.83. In terms of profitability, AGO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MBI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AGO is less volatile compared to MBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGO.Check MBI's competition here

AGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGO stands at 3.9B. In comparison, JRVR has a market cap of 297.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AGO is priced at $85.31, while JRVR trades at $6.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.46, whereas JRVR's P/E ratio is -3.02. In terms of profitability, AGO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JRVR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AGO is less volatile compared to JRVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGO.Check JRVR's competition here

AGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGO stands at 3.9B. In comparison, OSG has a market cap of 245.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AGO is priced at $85.31, while OSG trades at $5.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.46, whereas OSG's P/E ratio is -2.21. In terms of profitability, AGO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OSG's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AGO is less volatile compared to OSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGO.Check OSG's competition here

AGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGO stands at 3.9B. In comparison, AIFU has a market cap of 220.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AGO is priced at $85.31, while AIFU trades at $1.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.46, whereas AIFU's P/E ratio is 0.16. In terms of profitability, AGO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AIFU's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AGO is more volatile compared to AIFU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGO.Check AIFU's competition here

AGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGO stands at 3.9B. In comparison, ICCH has a market cap of 69.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AGO is priced at $85.31, while ICCH trades at $23.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.46, whereas ICCH's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, AGO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ICCH's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AGO is more volatile compared to ICCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGO.Check ICCH's competition here

AGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGO stands at 3.9B. In comparison, FBDC has a market cap of 38.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AGO is priced at $85.31, while FBDC trades at $17.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.46, whereas FBDC's P/E ratio is 9.26. In terms of profitability, AGO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FBDC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AGO is more volatile compared to FBDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGO.Check FBDC's competition here

AGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGO stands at 3.9B. In comparison, TIG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AGO is priced at $85.31, while TIG trades at $6.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.46, whereas TIG's P/E ratio is -4.78. In terms of profitability, AGO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TIG's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AGO is more volatile compared to TIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGO.Check TIG's competition here

AGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGO stands at 3.9B. In comparison, AMBC-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AGO is priced at $85.31, while AMBC-WT trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.46, whereas AMBC-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AGO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AMBC-WT's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AGO is less volatile compared to AMBC-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGO.Check AMBC-WT's competition here

AGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGO stands at 3.9B. In comparison, PROS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AGO is priced at $85.31, while PROS trades at $12.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.46, whereas PROS's P/E ratio is 2.03. In terms of profitability, AGO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PROS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AGO is more volatile compared to PROS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGO.Check PROS's competition here