Aeries Technology, Inc
Aeries Technology, Inc AERTW Peers
See (AERTW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Consulting Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AERTW | $0.02 | +3.50% | 38.6M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| VRSK | $309.47 | -0.30% | 43.3B | 45.51 | $6.80 | +0.54% |
| EFX | $267.60 | +1.25% | 33.2B | 54.72 | $4.89 | +0.63% |
| TRU | $85.88 | +2.26% | 16.8B | 45.20 | $1.90 | +0.51% |
| BAH | $102.16 | -1.11% | 12.7B | 14.09 | $7.25 | +2.08% |
| FCN | $162.21 | +0.60% | 5.6B | 22.22 | $7.30 | N/A |
| EXPO | $75.74 | +0.85% | 3.8B | 37.13 | $2.04 | +1.54% |
| HURN | $135.41 | +0.53% | 2.3B | 20.36 | $6.65 | N/A |
| ICFI | $86.09 | -1.14% | 1.6B | 14.79 | $5.82 | +0.65% |
| CRAI | $182.39 | +0.94% | 1.2B | 24.58 | $7.42 | +1.04% |
Stock Comparison
AERTW vs VRSK Comparison
AERTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AERTW stands at 38.6M. In comparison, VRSK has a market cap of 43.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AERTW is priced at $0.02, while VRSK trades at $309.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AERTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VRSK's P/E ratio is 45.51. In terms of profitability, AERTW's ROE is -4.79%, compared to VRSK's ROE of +4.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AERTW is less volatile compared to VRSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AERTW.
AERTW vs EFX Comparison
AERTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AERTW stands at 38.6M. In comparison, EFX has a market cap of 33.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AERTW is priced at $0.02, while EFX trades at $267.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AERTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EFX's P/E ratio is 54.72. In terms of profitability, AERTW's ROE is -4.79%, compared to EFX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AERTW is less volatile compared to EFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AERTW.
AERTW vs TRU Comparison
AERTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AERTW stands at 38.6M. In comparison, TRU has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AERTW is priced at $0.02, while TRU trades at $85.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AERTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRU's P/E ratio is 45.20. In terms of profitability, AERTW's ROE is -4.79%, compared to TRU's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AERTW is less volatile compared to TRU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AERTW.
AERTW vs BAH Comparison
AERTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AERTW stands at 38.6M. In comparison, BAH has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AERTW is priced at $0.02, while BAH trades at $102.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AERTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BAH's P/E ratio is 14.09. In terms of profitability, AERTW's ROE is -4.79%, compared to BAH's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, AERTW is less volatile compared to BAH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AERTW.
AERTW vs FCN Comparison
AERTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AERTW stands at 38.6M. In comparison, FCN has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AERTW is priced at $0.02, while FCN trades at $162.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AERTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCN's P/E ratio is 22.22. In terms of profitability, AERTW's ROE is -4.79%, compared to FCN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AERTW is less volatile compared to FCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AERTW.
AERTW vs EXPO Comparison
AERTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AERTW stands at 38.6M. In comparison, EXPO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AERTW is priced at $0.02, while EXPO trades at $75.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AERTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXPO's P/E ratio is 37.13. In terms of profitability, AERTW's ROE is -4.79%, compared to EXPO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AERTW is less volatile compared to EXPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AERTW.
AERTW vs HURN Comparison
AERTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AERTW stands at 38.6M. In comparison, HURN has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AERTW is priced at $0.02, while HURN trades at $135.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AERTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HURN's P/E ratio is 20.36. In terms of profitability, AERTW's ROE is -4.79%, compared to HURN's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AERTW is less volatile compared to HURN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AERTW.
AERTW vs ICFI Comparison
AERTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AERTW stands at 38.6M. In comparison, ICFI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AERTW is priced at $0.02, while ICFI trades at $86.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AERTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ICFI's P/E ratio is 14.79. In terms of profitability, AERTW's ROE is -4.79%, compared to ICFI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AERTW is less volatile compared to ICFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AERTW.
AERTW vs CRAI Comparison
AERTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AERTW stands at 38.6M. In comparison, CRAI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AERTW is priced at $0.02, while CRAI trades at $182.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AERTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRAI's P/E ratio is 24.58. In terms of profitability, AERTW's ROE is -4.79%, compared to CRAI's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AERTW is less volatile compared to CRAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AERTW.
AERTW vs SBC Comparison
AERTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AERTW stands at 38.6M. In comparison, SBC has a market cap of 453.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AERTW is priced at $0.02, while SBC trades at $4.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AERTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SBC's P/E ratio is 9.11. In terms of profitability, AERTW's ROE is -4.79%, compared to SBC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AERTW is less volatile compared to SBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AERTW.
AERTW vs FC Comparison
AERTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AERTW stands at 38.6M. In comparison, FC has a market cap of 302.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AERTW is priced at $0.02, while FC trades at $23.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AERTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FC's P/E ratio is 17.49. In terms of profitability, AERTW's ROE is -4.79%, compared to FC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AERTW is less volatile compared to FC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AERTW.
AERTW vs FORR Comparison
AERTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AERTW stands at 38.6M. In comparison, FORR has a market cap of 188.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AERTW is priced at $0.02, while FORR trades at $9.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AERTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FORR's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, AERTW's ROE is -4.79%, compared to FORR's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, AERTW is less volatile compared to FORR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AERTW.
AERTW vs RGP Comparison
AERTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AERTW stands at 38.6M. In comparison, RGP has a market cap of 185.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AERTW is priced at $0.02, while RGP trades at $5.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AERTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RGP's P/E ratio is -1.72. In terms of profitability, AERTW's ROE is -4.79%, compared to RGP's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AERTW is less volatile compared to RGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AERTW.
AERTW vs SDH Comparison
AERTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AERTW stands at 38.6M. In comparison, SDH has a market cap of 53M. Regarding current trading prices, AERTW is priced at $0.02, while SDH trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AERTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDH's P/E ratio is -6.08. In terms of profitability, AERTW's ROE is -4.79%, compared to SDH's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AERTW is less volatile compared to SDH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AERTW.
AERTW vs AERT Comparison
AERTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AERTW stands at 38.6M. In comparison, AERT has a market cap of 44.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AERTW is priced at $0.02, while AERT trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AERTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AERT's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, AERTW's ROE is -4.79%, compared to AERT's ROE of -4.79%. Regarding short-term risk, AERTW is less volatile compared to AERT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AERTW.
AERTW vs ROMA Comparison
AERTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AERTW stands at 38.6M. In comparison, ROMA has a market cap of 34.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AERTW is priced at $0.02, while ROMA trades at $2.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AERTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ROMA's P/E ratio is -11.98. In terms of profitability, AERTW's ROE is -4.79%, compared to ROMA's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, AERTW is less volatile compared to ROMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AERTW.
AERTW vs SBCWW Comparison
AERTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AERTW stands at 38.6M. In comparison, SBCWW has a market cap of 26.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AERTW is priced at $0.02, while SBCWW trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AERTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SBCWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AERTW's ROE is -4.79%, compared to SBCWW's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AERTW is less volatile compared to SBCWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AERTW.
AERTW vs EPOW Comparison
AERTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AERTW stands at 38.6M. In comparison, EPOW has a market cap of 24.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AERTW is priced at $0.02, while EPOW trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AERTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EPOW's P/E ratio is -1.88. In terms of profitability, AERTW's ROE is -4.79%, compared to EPOW's ROE of +439.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AERTW is less volatile compared to EPOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AERTW.
AERTW vs GRNQ Comparison
AERTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AERTW stands at 38.6M. In comparison, GRNQ has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AERTW is priced at $0.02, while GRNQ trades at $1.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AERTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRNQ's P/E ratio is -14.08. In terms of profitability, AERTW's ROE is -4.79%, compared to GRNQ's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AERTW is less volatile compared to GRNQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AERTW.
AERTW vs VCIG Comparison
AERTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AERTW stands at 38.6M. In comparison, VCIG has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, AERTW is priced at $0.02, while VCIG trades at $2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AERTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VCIG's P/E ratio is 0.05. In terms of profitability, AERTW's ROE is -4.79%, compared to VCIG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AERTW is less volatile compared to VCIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AERTW.
AERTW vs INTJ Comparison
AERTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AERTW stands at 38.6M. In comparison, INTJ has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AERTW is priced at $0.02, while INTJ trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AERTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INTJ's P/E ratio is 26.05. In terms of profitability, AERTW's ROE is -4.79%, compared to INTJ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AERTW is less volatile compared to INTJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AERTW.
AERTW vs NLSN Comparison
AERTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AERTW stands at 38.6M. In comparison, NLSN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AERTW is priced at $0.02, while NLSN trades at $27.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AERTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NLSN's P/E ratio is 17.71. In terms of profitability, AERTW's ROE is -4.79%, compared to NLSN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AERTW is less volatile compared to NLSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AERTW.