American Electric Power Company, Inc.
American Electric Power Company, Inc. (AEPPZ) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (AEPPZ) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Regulated Electric Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AEPPZ | $47.12 | -1.09% | 0 | 9.03 | $5.22 | +2.90% |
| NEE | $91.64 | +0.00% | 192.1B | 27.93 | $3.30 | +2.46% |
| SO | $95.05 | +0.00% | 103.9B | 23.46 | $4.02 | +3.13% |
| DUK | $126.37 | +0.00% | 98.6B | 20.09 | $6.31 | +3.34% |
| DUK-PA | $25.06 | +0.00% | 98B | 5.28 | $4.76 | +3.34% |
| NGG | $90.27 | +0.00% | 89.8B | 22.19 | $4.07 | +3.42% |
| AEP | $128.42 | +0.00% | 70B | 19.43 | $6.66 | +2.90% |
| SOMN | $53.16 | +0.00% | 58.3B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| D | $65.46 | +0.00% | 56.3B | 21.85 | $3.02 | +4.05% |
| NEE-PN | $24.35 | +0.00% | 50.1B | N/A | N/A | +2.46% |
Stock Comparison
AEPPZ vs NEE Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, NEE has a market cap of 192.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while NEE trades at $91.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas NEE's P/E ratio is 27.93. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NEE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is more volatile compared to NEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check NEE's competition here
AEPPZ vs SO Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, SO has a market cap of 103.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while SO trades at $95.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas SO's P/E ratio is 23.46. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is more volatile compared to SO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check SO's competition here
AEPPZ vs DUK Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, DUK has a market cap of 98.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while DUK trades at $126.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas DUK's P/E ratio is 20.09. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DUK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is more volatile compared to DUK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check DUK's competition here
AEPPZ vs DUK-PA Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, DUK-PA has a market cap of 98B. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while DUK-PA trades at $25.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas DUK-PA's P/E ratio is 5.28. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DUK-PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is more volatile compared to DUK-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check DUK-PA's competition here
AEPPZ vs NGG Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, NGG has a market cap of 89.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while NGG trades at $90.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas NGG's P/E ratio is 22.19. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NGG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is more volatile compared to NGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check NGG's competition here
AEPPZ vs AEP Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, AEP has a market cap of 70B. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while AEP trades at $128.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas AEP's P/E ratio is 19.43. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AEP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is more volatile compared to AEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check AEP's competition here
AEPPZ vs SOMN Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, SOMN has a market cap of 58.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while SOMN trades at $53.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas SOMN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SOMN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is more volatile compared to SOMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check SOMN's competition here
AEPPZ vs D Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, D has a market cap of 56.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while D trades at $65.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas D's P/E ratio is 21.85. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to D's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is more volatile compared to D. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check D's competition here
AEPPZ vs NEE-PN Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, NEE-PN has a market cap of 50.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while NEE-PN trades at $24.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas NEE-PN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NEE-PN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is more volatile compared to NEE-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check NEE-PN's competition here
AEPPZ vs EXC Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, EXC has a market cap of 48.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while EXC trades at $47.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas EXC's P/E ratio is 17.51. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EXC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is more volatile compared to EXC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check EXC's competition here
AEPPZ vs XEL Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, XEL has a market cap of 48.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while XEL trades at $80.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas XEL's P/E ratio is 23.85. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to XEL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is more volatile compared to XEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check XEL's competition here
AEPPZ vs ETR Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, ETR has a market cap of 46.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while ETR trades at $103.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas ETR's P/E ratio is 26.60. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ETR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is more volatile compared to ETR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check ETR's competition here
AEPPZ vs PEG Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, PEG has a market cap of 42.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while PEG trades at $85.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas PEG's P/E ratio is 20.57. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PEG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is more volatile compared to PEG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check PEG's competition here
AEPPZ vs EXCVV Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, EXCVV has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while EXCVV trades at $41.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas EXCVV's P/E ratio is 15.66. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EXCVV's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is less volatile compared to EXCVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check EXCVV's competition here
AEPPZ vs PCG Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, PCG has a market cap of 40.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while PCG trades at $18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas PCG's P/E ratio is 15.55. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PCG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is less volatile compared to PCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check PCG's competition here
AEPPZ vs ELC Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, ELC has a market cap of 39.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while ELC trades at $21.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas ELC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ELC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is more volatile compared to ELC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check ELC's competition here
AEPPZ vs ED Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, ED has a market cap of 39.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while ED trades at $111.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas ED's P/E ratio is 19.20. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ED's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is more volatile compared to ED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check ED's competition here
AEPPZ vs WEC Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, WEC has a market cap of 37.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while WEC trades at $114.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas WEC's P/E ratio is 23.77. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WEC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is more volatile compared to WEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check WEC's competition here
AEPPZ vs AEE Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, AEE has a market cap of 30.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while AEE trades at $109.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas AEE's P/E ratio is 21.17. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AEE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is more volatile compared to AEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check AEE's competition here
AEPPZ vs DTE Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, DTE has a market cap of 30.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while DTE trades at $145.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas DTE's P/E ratio is 21.75. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DTE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is less volatile compared to DTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check DTE's competition here
AEPPZ vs FE Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, FE has a market cap of 29B. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while FE trades at $49.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas FE's P/E ratio is 21.55. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is more volatile compared to FE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check FE's competition here
AEPPZ vs KEP Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, KEP has a market cap of 28.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while KEP trades at $21.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas KEP's P/E ratio is 5.05. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KEP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is more volatile compared to KEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check KEP's competition here
AEPPZ vs FTS Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, FTS has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while FTS trades at $56.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas FTS's P/E ratio is 22.51. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FTS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is more volatile compared to FTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check FTS's competition here
AEPPZ vs EIX Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, EIX has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while EIX trades at $72.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas EIX's P/E ratio is 9.67. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EIX's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is less volatile compared to EIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check EIX's competition here
AEPPZ vs PPL Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, PPL has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while PPL trades at $36.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas PPL's P/E ratio is 25.48. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PPL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is more volatile compared to PPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check PPL's competition here
AEPPZ vs ES Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, ES has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while ES trades at $73.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas ES's P/E ratio is 16.13. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ES's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is less volatile compared to ES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check ES's competition here
AEPPZ vs EBR-B Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, EBR-B has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while EBR-B trades at $11.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas EBR-B's P/E ratio is 21.63. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EBR-B's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is less volatile compared to EBR-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check EBR-B's competition here
AEPPZ vs CMS Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, CMS has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while CMS trades at $75.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas CMS's P/E ratio is 21.49. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CMS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is more volatile compared to CMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check CMS's competition here
AEPPZ vs SOJD Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, SOJD has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while SOJD trades at $20.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas SOJD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SOJD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is more volatile compared to SOJD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check SOJD's competition here
AEPPZ vs DTY Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, DTY has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while DTY trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas DTY's P/E ratio is 5.53. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DTY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is more volatile compared to DTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check DTY's competition here
AEPPZ vs SOJC Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, SOJC has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while SOJC trades at $22.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas SOJC's P/E ratio is 26.79. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SOJC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is more volatile compared to SOJC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check SOJC's competition here
AEPPZ vs EBR Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, EBR has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while EBR trades at $9.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas EBR's P/E ratio is 17.04. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EBR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is less volatile compared to EBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check EBR's competition here
AEPPZ vs SOJE Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, SOJE has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while SOJE trades at $18.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas SOJE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SOJE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is more volatile compared to SOJE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check SOJE's competition here
AEPPZ vs DUKB Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, DUKB has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while DUKB trades at $24.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas DUKB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DUKB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is more volatile compared to DUKB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check DUKB's competition here
AEPPZ vs AQNB Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, AQNB has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while AQNB trades at $25.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas AQNB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AQNB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is more volatile compared to AQNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check AQNB's competition here
AEPPZ vs EVRG Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, EVRG has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while EVRG trades at $79.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas EVRG's P/E ratio is 21.99. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EVRG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is less volatile compared to EVRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check EVRG's competition here
AEPPZ vs LNT Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, LNT has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while LNT trades at $70.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas LNT's P/E ratio is 22.33. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LNT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is more volatile compared to LNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check LNT's competition here
AEPPZ vs EMA Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, EMA has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while EMA trades at $51.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas EMA's P/E ratio is 19.13. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EMA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is more volatile compared to EMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check EMA's competition here
AEPPZ vs SREA Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, SREA has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while SREA trades at $22.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas SREA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SREA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is more volatile compared to SREA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check SREA's competition here
AEPPZ vs AGR Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, AGR has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while AGR trades at $36.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas AGR's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AGR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is more volatile compared to AGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check AGR's competition here
AEPPZ vs NEE-PR Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, NEE-PR has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while NEE-PR trades at $6.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas NEE-PR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NEE-PR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is more volatile compared to NEE-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check NEE-PR's competition here
AEPPZ vs PNW Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, PNW has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while PNW trades at $98.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas PNW's P/E ratio is 20.28. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PNW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is less volatile compared to PNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check PNW's competition here
AEPPZ vs OKLO Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, OKLO has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while OKLO trades at $67.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas OKLO's P/E ratio is -114.00. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OKLO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is less volatile compared to OKLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check OKLO's competition here
AEPPZ vs OGE Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, OGE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while OGE trades at $46.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas OGE's P/E ratio is 19.02. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OGE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is more volatile compared to OGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check OGE's competition here
AEPPZ vs IDA Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, IDA has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while IDA trades at $138.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas IDA's P/E ratio is 24.08. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IDA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is less volatile compared to IDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check IDA's competition here
AEPPZ vs CMSC Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, CMSC has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while CMSC trades at $23.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas CMSC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CMSC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is more volatile compared to CMSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check CMSC's competition here
AEPPZ vs CMSD Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, CMSD has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while CMSD trades at $23.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas CMSD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CMSD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is more volatile compared to CMSD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check CMSD's competition here
AEPPZ vs CMSA Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, CMSA has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while CMSA trades at $23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas CMSA's P/E ratio is 12.94. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CMSA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is more volatile compared to CMSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check CMSA's competition here
AEPPZ vs CMS-PB Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, CMS-PB has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while CMS-PB trades at $84.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas CMS-PB's P/E ratio is 7.74. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CMS-PB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is less volatile compared to CMS-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check CMS-PB's competition here
AEPPZ vs TXNM Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, TXNM has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while TXNM trades at $58.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas TXNM's P/E ratio is 32.81. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TXNM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is more volatile compared to TXNM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check TXNM's competition here
AEPPZ vs PCG-PA Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, PCG-PA has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while PCG-PA trades at $22.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas PCG-PA's P/E ratio is 12.39. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PCG-PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is more volatile compared to PCG-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check PCG-PA's competition here
AEPPZ vs POR Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, POR has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while POR trades at $52.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas POR's P/E ratio is 19.07. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to POR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is less volatile compared to POR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check POR's competition here
AEPPZ vs ENIC Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, ENIC has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while ENIC trades at $4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas ENIC's P/E ratio is 104.25. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ENIC's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is less volatile compared to ENIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check ENIC's competition here
AEPPZ vs FRMI Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, FRMI has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while FRMI trades at $9.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas FRMI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FRMI's ROE of -3.52%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is less volatile compared to FRMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check FRMI's competition here
AEPPZ vs PCG-PB Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, PCG-PB has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while PCG-PB trades at $20.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas PCG-PB's P/E ratio is 11.54. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PCG-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is more volatile compared to PCG-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check PCG-PB's competition here
AEPPZ vs CMS-PC Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, CMS-PC has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while CMS-PC trades at $17.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas CMS-PC's P/E ratio is 3.88. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CMS-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is more volatile compared to CMS-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check CMS-PC's competition here
AEPPZ vs PCG-PG Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, PCG-PG has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while PCG-PG trades at $19.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas PCG-PG's P/E ratio is 10.64. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PCG-PG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is less volatile compared to PCG-PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check PCG-PG's competition here
AEPPZ vs PCG-PC Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, PCG-PC has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while PCG-PC trades at $19.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas PCG-PC's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PCG-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is more volatile compared to PCG-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check PCG-PC's competition here
AEPPZ vs PCG-PD Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, PCG-PD has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while PCG-PD trades at $18.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas PCG-PD's P/E ratio is 10.50. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PCG-PD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is more volatile compared to PCG-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check PCG-PD's competition here
AEPPZ vs PCG-PE Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, PCG-PE has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while PCG-PE trades at $18.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas PCG-PE's P/E ratio is 10.48. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PCG-PE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is more volatile compared to PCG-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check PCG-PE's competition here
AEPPZ vs PCG-PH Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, PCG-PH has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while PCG-PH trades at $17.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas PCG-PH's P/E ratio is 9.95. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PCG-PH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is more volatile compared to PCG-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check PCG-PH's competition here
AEPPZ vs DTJ Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, DTJ has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while DTJ trades at $25.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas DTJ's P/E ratio is 4.12. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DTJ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is more volatile compared to DTJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check DTJ's competition here
AEPPZ vs DTW Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, DTW has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while DTW trades at $22.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas DTW's P/E ratio is 3.67. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DTW's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is more volatile compared to DTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check DTW's competition here
AEPPZ vs PNM Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, PNM has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while PNM trades at $41.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas PNM's P/E ratio is 46.41. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PNM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is less volatile compared to PNM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check PNM's competition here
AEPPZ vs DTB Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, DTB has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while DTB trades at $17.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas DTB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DTB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is more volatile compared to DTB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check DTB's competition here
AEPPZ vs DTG Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, DTG has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while DTG trades at $17.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas DTG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DTG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is more volatile compared to DTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check DTG's competition here
AEPPZ vs CEPU Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, CEPU has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while CEPU trades at $16.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas CEPU's P/E ratio is 12.62. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CEPU's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is less volatile compared to CEPU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check CEPU's competition here
AEPPZ vs EDN Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, EDN has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while EDN trades at $28.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas EDN's P/E ratio is 16.99. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EDN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is less volatile compared to EDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check EDN's competition here
AEPPZ vs ETI-P Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, ETI-P has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while ETI-P trades at $23.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas ETI-P's P/E ratio is 6.07. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ETI-P's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is more volatile compared to ETI-P. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check ETI-P's competition here
AEPPZ vs EAI Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, EAI has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while EAI trades at $21.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas EAI's P/E ratio is 6.26. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EAI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is more volatile compared to EAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check EAI's competition here
AEPPZ vs SPKE Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, SPKE has a market cap of 431.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while SPKE trades at $11.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas SPKE's P/E ratio is 19.47. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SPKE's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is less volatile compared to SPKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check SPKE's competition here
AEPPZ vs SPKEP Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, SPKEP has a market cap of 409.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while SPKEP trades at $25.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas SPKEP's P/E ratio is 44.46. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SPKEP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is more volatile compared to SPKEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check SPKEP's competition here
AEPPZ vs GNE Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, GNE has a market cap of 378.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while GNE trades at $14.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas GNE's P/E ratio is 48.90. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GNE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is more volatile compared to GNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check GNE's competition here
AEPPZ vs GNE-PA Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, GNE-PA has a market cap of 291.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while GNE-PA trades at $8.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas GNE-PA's P/E ratio is 4.68. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GNE-PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is more volatile compared to GNE-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check GNE-PA's competition here
AEPPZ vs GPJA Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, GPJA has a market cap of 217.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while GPJA trades at $23.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas GPJA's P/E ratio is 0.14. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GPJA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is more volatile compared to GPJA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check GPJA's competition here
AEPPZ vs ENO Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, ENO has a market cap of 194.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while ENO trades at $22.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas ENO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ENO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is more volatile compared to ENO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check ENO's competition here
AEPPZ vs EMP Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, EMP has a market cap of 183.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while EMP trades at $21.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas EMP's P/E ratio is 1.60. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EMP's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is more volatile compared to EMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check EMP's competition here
AEPPZ vs ENJ Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, ENJ has a market cap of 179M. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while ENJ trades at $21.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas ENJ's P/E ratio is 3.53. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ENJ's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is more volatile compared to ENJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check ENJ's competition here
AEPPZ vs VIASP Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, VIASP has a market cap of 97.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while VIASP trades at $25.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas VIASP's P/E ratio is 21.93. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VIASP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is more volatile compared to VIASP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check VIASP's competition here
AEPPZ vs ETI Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, ETI has a market cap of 57.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while ETI trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas ETI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ETI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is more volatile compared to ETI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check ETI's competition here
AEPPZ vs IPLDP Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, IPLDP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while IPLDP trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas IPLDP's P/E ratio is 0.94. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IPLDP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is more volatile compared to IPLDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check IPLDP's competition here
AEPPZ vs NMK Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, NMK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while NMK trades at $18.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas NMK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NMK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is more volatile compared to NMK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check NMK's competition here
AEPPZ vs NEE-PQ Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, NEE-PQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while NEE-PQ trades at $45.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas NEE-PQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NEE-PQ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is more volatile compared to NEE-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check NEE-PQ's competition here
AEPPZ vs DCUE Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, DCUE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while DCUE trades at $101.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas DCUE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DCUE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is more volatile compared to DCUE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check DCUE's competition here
AEPPZ vs PCGU Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, PCGU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while PCGU trades at $145.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas PCGU's P/E ratio is 1188.52. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PCGU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is more volatile compared to PCGU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check PCGU's competition here
AEPPZ vs NEE-PP Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, NEE-PP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while NEE-PP trades at $47.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas NEE-PP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NEE-PP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is more volatile compared to NEE-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check NEE-PP's competition here
AEPPZ vs CNP-PB Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, CNP-PB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while CNP-PB trades at $46.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas CNP-PB's P/E ratio is 42.64. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CNP-PB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is more volatile compared to CNP-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check CNP-PB's competition here
AEPPZ vs ALP-PQ Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, ALP-PQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while ALP-PQ trades at $25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas ALP-PQ's P/E ratio is 0.62. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALP-PQ's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is more volatile compared to ALP-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check ALP-PQ's competition here
AEPPZ vs DTP Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, DTP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while DTP trades at $51.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas DTP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DTP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is less volatile compared to DTP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check DTP's competition here
AEPPZ vs ENIA Comparison February 2026
AEPPZ plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEPPZ stands at 0. In comparison, ENIA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AEPPZ is priced at $47.12, while ENIA trades at $4.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEPPZ currently has a P/E ratio of 9.03, whereas ENIA's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, AEPPZ's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ENIA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AEPPZ is less volatile compared to ENIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEPPZ.Check ENIA's competition here