ZR2 Bioenergy Limited

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, UPL.BO has a market cap of 634.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while UPL.BO trades at ₹764.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas UPL.BO's P/E ratio is 35.93. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to UPL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to UPL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check UPL.BO's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, FLUOROCHEM.NS has a market cap of 376.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while FLUOROCHEM.NS trades at ₹3,411.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas FLUOROCHEM.NS's P/E ratio is 57.34. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FLUOROCHEM.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to FLUOROCHEM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check FLUOROCHEM.NS's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, NAVINFLUOR.NS has a market cap of 334.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while NAVINFLUOR.NS trades at ₹6,388.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas NAVINFLUOR.NS's P/E ratio is 60.44. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NAVINFLUOR.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to NAVINFLUOR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check NAVINFLUOR.NS's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, NAVINFLUOR.BO has a market cap of 334.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while NAVINFLUOR.BO trades at ₹6,387.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas NAVINFLUOR.BO's P/E ratio is 60.42. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NAVINFLUOR.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to NAVINFLUOR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check NAVINFLUOR.BO's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, DEEPAKNI.BO has a market cap of 332.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while DEEPAKNI.BO trades at ₹2,436.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas DEEPAKNI.BO's P/E ratio is 57.46. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DEEPAKNI.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to DEEPAKNI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check DEEPAKNI.BO's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, DEEPAKNTR.NS has a market cap of 218.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while DEEPAKNTR.NS trades at ₹1,639.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas DEEPAKNTR.NS's P/E ratio is 41.10. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DEEPAKNTR.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to DEEPAKNTR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check DEEPAKNTR.NS's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, DEEPAKNTR.BO has a market cap of 218.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while DEEPAKNTR.BO trades at ₹1,640.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas DEEPAKNTR.BO's P/E ratio is 40.99. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DEEPAKNTR.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to DEEPAKNTR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check DEEPAKNTR.BO's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, BAYERCROP.BO has a market cap of 215.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while BAYERCROP.BO trades at ₹4,767.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas BAYERCROP.BO's P/E ratio is 32.14. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BAYERCROP.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to BAYERCROP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check BAYERCROP.BO's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, TATACHEM.NS has a market cap of 182.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while TATACHEM.NS trades at ₹705.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas TATACHEM.NS's P/E ratio is 112.77. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TATACHEM.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to TATACHEM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check TATACHEM.NS's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, TATACHEM.BO has a market cap of 182.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while TATACHEM.BO trades at ₹705.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas TATACHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 111.94. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TATACHEM.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to TATACHEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check TATACHEM.BO's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, DEEPAKFERT.NS has a market cap of 126.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while DEEPAKFERT.NS trades at ₹1,003.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas DEEPAKFERT.NS's P/E ratio is 14.44. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DEEPAKFERT.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to DEEPAKFERT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check DEEPAKFERT.NS's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, DEEPAKFERT.BO has a market cap of 126.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while DEEPAKFERT.BO trades at ₹1,004.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas DEEPAKFERT.BO's P/E ratio is 14.44. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DEEPAKFERT.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to DEEPAKFERT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check DEEPAKFERT.BO's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, SPLPETRO.NS has a market cap of 124.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while SPLPETRO.NS trades at ₹650.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas SPLPETRO.NS's P/E ratio is 45.62. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SPLPETRO.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to SPLPETRO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check SPLPETRO.NS's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, ACI.BO has a market cap of 69.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while ACI.BO trades at ₹566.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas ACI.BO's P/E ratio is 47.43. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ACI.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to ACI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check ACI.BO's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, ACI.NS has a market cap of 69.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while ACI.NS trades at ₹566.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas ACI.NS's P/E ratio is 47.04. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ACI.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to ACI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check ACI.NS's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, GNFC.NS has a market cap of 68.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while GNFC.NS trades at ₹461.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas GNFC.NS's P/E ratio is 10.94. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GNFC.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to GNFC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check GNFC.NS's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, GNFC.BO has a market cap of 68.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while GNFC.BO trades at ₹460.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas GNFC.BO's P/E ratio is 10.71. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GNFC.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to GNFC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check GNFC.BO's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, INDIAGLYCO.BO has a market cap of 63.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while INDIAGLYCO.BO trades at ₹945.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas INDIAGLYCO.BO's P/E ratio is 22.62. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to INDIAGLYCO.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to INDIAGLYCO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check INDIAGLYCO.BO's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, INDIAGLYCO.NS has a market cap of 63.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while INDIAGLYCO.NS trades at ₹941.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas INDIAGLYCO.NS's P/E ratio is 21.92. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to INDIAGLYCO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check INDIAGLYCO.NS's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, RAIN.BO has a market cap of 49B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while RAIN.BO trades at ₹147.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas RAIN.BO's P/E ratio is -37.06. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RAIN.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to RAIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check RAIN.BO's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, RAIN.NS has a market cap of 48.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while RAIN.NS trades at ₹147.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas RAIN.NS's P/E ratio is -36.94. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RAIN.NS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to RAIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check RAIN.NS's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, GHCL.BO has a market cap of 45.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while GHCL.BO trades at ₹498.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas GHCL.BO's P/E ratio is 9.35. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GHCL.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to GHCL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check GHCL.BO's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, GHCL.NS has a market cap of 45.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while GHCL.NS trades at ₹499.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas GHCL.NS's P/E ratio is 9.34. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GHCL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to GHCL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check GHCL.NS's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, CHEMPLASTS.NS has a market cap of 45.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while CHEMPLASTS.NS trades at ₹289.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas CHEMPLASTS.NS's P/E ratio is -15.96. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CHEMPLASTS.NS's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to CHEMPLASTS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check CHEMPLASTS.NS's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, CHEMPLASTS.BO has a market cap of 45.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while CHEMPLASTS.BO trades at ₹289.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas CHEMPLASTS.BO's P/E ratio is -15.98. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CHEMPLASTS.BO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to CHEMPLASTS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check CHEMPLASTS.BO's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, MFL.NS has a market cap of 44.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while MFL.NS trades at ₹1,062.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas MFL.NS's P/E ratio is 15.94. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MFL.NS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to MFL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check MFL.NS's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, EPIGRAL.NS has a market cap of 40.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while EPIGRAL.NS trades at ₹979.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas EPIGRAL.NS's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EPIGRAL.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to EPIGRAL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check EPIGRAL.NS's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, EPIGRAL.BO has a market cap of 40.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while EPIGRAL.BO trades at ₹981.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas EPIGRAL.BO's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EPIGRAL.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to EPIGRAL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check EPIGRAL.BO's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, MEGH.NS has a market cap of 35.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while MEGH.NS trades at ₹139.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas MEGH.NS's P/E ratio is 15.63. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MEGH.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to MEGH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check MEGH.NS's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, STYRENIX.NS has a market cap of 34.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while STYRENIX.NS trades at ₹1,972.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas STYRENIX.NS's P/E ratio is 20.69. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to STYRENIX.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to STYRENIX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check STYRENIX.NS's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, STYRENIX.BO has a market cap of 34.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while STYRENIX.BO trades at ₹1,972.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas STYRENIX.BO's P/E ratio is 20.69. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to STYRENIX.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to STYRENIX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check STYRENIX.BO's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, GUJALKALI.BO has a market cap of 34.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while GUJALKALI.BO trades at ₹468.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas GUJALKALI.BO's P/E ratio is -404.09. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GUJALKALI.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to GUJALKALI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check GUJALKALI.BO's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, GUJALKALI.NS has a market cap of 34.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while GUJALKALI.NS trades at ₹467.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas GUJALKALI.NS's P/E ratio is -403.91. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GUJALKALI.NS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to GUJALKALI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check GUJALKALI.NS's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, ELLEN.NS has a market cap of 34.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while ELLEN.NS trades at ₹245.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas ELLEN.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ELLEN.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to ELLEN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check ELLEN.NS's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, RPEL.BO has a market cap of 31.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while RPEL.BO trades at ₹699.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas RPEL.BO's P/E ratio is 63.48. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RPEL.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to RPEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check RPEL.BO's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, RPEL.NS has a market cap of 31.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while RPEL.NS trades at ₹699.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas RPEL.NS's P/E ratio is 64.88. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RPEL.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to RPEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check RPEL.NS's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, FOSECOIND.BO has a market cap of 30.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while FOSECOIND.BO trades at ₹4,601.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas FOSECOIND.BO's P/E ratio is 38.39. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FOSECOIND.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to FOSECOIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check FOSECOIND.BO's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, FOSECOIND.NS has a market cap of 30.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while FOSECOIND.NS trades at ₹4,601.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas FOSECOIND.NS's P/E ratio is 38.07. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FOSECOIND.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to FOSECOIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check FOSECOIND.NS's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, DDEVPLASTIK.BO has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while DDEVPLASTIK.BO trades at ₹262.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas DDEVPLASTIK.BO's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DDEVPLASTIK.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to DDEVPLASTIK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check DDEVPLASTIK.BO's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, BEPL.NS has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while BEPL.NS trades at ₹84.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas BEPL.NS's P/E ratio is 12.51. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BEPL.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to BEPL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check BEPL.NS's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, BEPL.BO has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while BEPL.BO trades at ₹84.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas BEPL.BO's P/E ratio is 12.47. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BEPL.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to BEPL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check BEPL.BO's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, SANSTAR.NS has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while SANSTAR.NS trades at ₹88.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas SANSTAR.NS's P/E ratio is 82.12. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SANSTAR.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to SANSTAR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check SANSTAR.NS's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, DCW.BO has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while DCW.BO trades at ₹50.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas DCW.BO's P/E ratio is 29.82. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DCW.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to DCW.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check DCW.BO's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, DCW.NS has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while DCW.NS trades at ₹50.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas DCW.NS's P/E ratio is 35.73. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DCW.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to DCW.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check DCW.NS's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, GODAVARIB.NS has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while GODAVARIB.NS trades at ₹277.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas GODAVARIB.NS's P/E ratio is 73.59. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GODAVARIB.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to GODAVARIB.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check GODAVARIB.NS's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, INEOSSTYRO.NS has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while INEOSSTYRO.NS trades at ₹807.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas INEOSSTYRO.NS's P/E ratio is 11.53. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to INEOSSTYRO.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to INEOSSTYRO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check INEOSSTYRO.NS's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, PUNJABCHEM.NS has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while PUNJABCHEM.NS trades at ₹1,022.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas PUNJABCHEM.NS's P/E ratio is 20.90. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PUNJABCHEM.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to PUNJABCHEM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check PUNJABCHEM.NS's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, PUNJABCHEM.BO has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while PUNJABCHEM.BO trades at ₹1,017.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas PUNJABCHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 20.86. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PUNJABCHEM.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to PUNJABCHEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check PUNJABCHEM.BO's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, IGPL.BO has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while IGPL.BO trades at ₹364.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas IGPL.BO's P/E ratio is 34.98. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IGPL.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to IGPL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check IGPL.BO's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, A1L.BO has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while A1L.BO trades at ₹25.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas A1L.BO's P/E ratio is 302.38. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to A1L.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to A1L.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check A1L.BO's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, GEMAROMA.NS has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while GEMAROMA.NS trades at ₹193.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas GEMAROMA.NS's P/E ratio is 36.33. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GEMAROMA.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to GEMAROMA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check GEMAROMA.NS's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, ANDHRSUGAR.NS has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while ANDHRSUGAR.NS trades at ₹72.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas ANDHRSUGAR.NS's P/E ratio is 11.69. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ANDHRSUGAR.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to ANDHRSUGAR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check ANDHRSUGAR.NS's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, ZUARI.BO has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while ZUARI.BO trades at ₹232.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas ZUARI.BO's P/E ratio is 1.01. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ZUARI.BO's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to ZUARI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check ZUARI.BO's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, ANDHRSUGAR.BO has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while ANDHRSUGAR.BO trades at ₹72.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas ANDHRSUGAR.BO's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ANDHRSUGAR.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to ANDHRSUGAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check ANDHRSUGAR.BO's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, GULPOLY.NS has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while GULPOLY.NS trades at ₹154.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas GULPOLY.NS's P/E ratio is 12.49. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GULPOLY.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to GULPOLY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check GULPOLY.NS's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, GULPOLY.BO has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while GULPOLY.BO trades at ₹154.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas GULPOLY.BO's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GULPOLY.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to GULPOLY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check GULPOLY.BO's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, AMNPLST.BO has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while AMNPLST.BO trades at ₹165.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas AMNPLST.BO's P/E ratio is 25.16. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AMNPLST.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to AMNPLST.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check AMNPLST.BO's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, AMNPLST.NS has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while AMNPLST.NS trades at ₹163.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas AMNPLST.NS's P/E ratio is 25.04. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AMNPLST.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to AMNPLST.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check AMNPLST.NS's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, SRHHYPOLTD.BO has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while SRHHYPOLTD.BO trades at ₹489.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas SRHHYPOLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SRHHYPOLTD.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to SRHHYPOLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check SRHHYPOLTD.BO's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, SRHHYPOLTD.NS has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while SRHHYPOLTD.NS trades at ₹490.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas SRHHYPOLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 8.94. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SRHHYPOLTD.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to SRHHYPOLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check SRHHYPOLTD.NS's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, INDOAMIN.NS has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while INDOAMIN.NS trades at ₹113.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas INDOAMIN.NS's P/E ratio is 11.53. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to INDOAMIN.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to INDOAMIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check INDOAMIN.NS's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, INDOAMIN.BO has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while INDOAMIN.BO trades at ₹113.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas INDOAMIN.BO's P/E ratio is 11.44. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to INDOAMIN.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to INDOAMIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check INDOAMIN.BO's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, ORIENTCQ.BO has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while ORIENTCQ.BO trades at ₹810.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas ORIENTCQ.BO's P/E ratio is 15.88. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ORIENTCQ.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to ORIENTCQ.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check ORIENTCQ.BO's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, INDOBORAX.NS has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while INDOBORAX.NS trades at ₹247.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas INDOBORAX.NS's P/E ratio is 17.10. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to INDOBORAX.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to INDOBORAX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check INDOBORAX.NS's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, INDOBORAX.BO has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while INDOBORAX.BO trades at ₹248.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas INDOBORAX.BO's P/E ratio is 17.10. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to INDOBORAX.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to INDOBORAX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check INDOBORAX.BO's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, UNIENTER.NS has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while UNIENTER.NS trades at ₹109.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas UNIENTER.NS's P/E ratio is 38.03. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to UNIENTER.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to UNIENTER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check UNIENTER.NS's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, VALIANTORG.NS has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while VALIANTORG.NS trades at ₹242.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas VALIANTORG.NS's P/E ratio is 29.53. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VALIANTORG.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to VALIANTORG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check VALIANTORG.NS's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, VALIANTORG.BO has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while VALIANTORG.BO trades at ₹242.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas VALIANTORG.BO's P/E ratio is 29.39. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VALIANTORG.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to VALIANTORG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check VALIANTORG.BO's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, SUNSHIEL.BO has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while SUNSHIEL.BO trades at ₹855.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas SUNSHIEL.BO's P/E ratio is 25.79. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SUNSHIEL.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to SUNSHIEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check SUNSHIEL.BO's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, DMCC.BO has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while DMCC.BO trades at ₹239.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas DMCC.BO's P/E ratio is 23.16. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DMCC.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to DMCC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check DMCC.BO's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, DMCC.NS has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while DMCC.NS trades at ₹241.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas DMCC.NS's P/E ratio is 23.06. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DMCC.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to DMCC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check DMCC.NS's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, NATPEROX.BO has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while NATPEROX.BO trades at ₹1,040.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas NATPEROX.BO's P/E ratio is 399.75. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NATPEROX.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to NATPEROX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check NATPEROX.BO's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, PRIMO.NS has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while PRIMO.NS trades at ₹20.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas PRIMO.NS's P/E ratio is 64.91. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PRIMO.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to PRIMO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check PRIMO.NS's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, SHIVALIK.BO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while SHIVALIK.BO trades at ₹297.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas SHIVALIK.BO's P/E ratio is 33.81. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SHIVALIK.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to SHIVALIK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check SHIVALIK.BO's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, OCCLLTD.NS has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while OCCLLTD.NS trades at ₹90.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas OCCLLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OCCLLTD.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to OCCLLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check OCCLLTD.NS's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, ARIES.BO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while ARIES.BO trades at ₹346.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas ARIES.BO's P/E ratio is 11.76. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ARIES.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to ARIES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check ARIES.BO's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, NAPEROL.BO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while NAPEROL.BO trades at ₹629.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas NAPEROL.BO's P/E ratio is 39.54. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NAPEROL.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to NAPEROL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check NAPEROL.BO's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, KANORICHEM.BO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while KANORICHEM.BO trades at ₹77.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas KANORICHEM.BO's P/E ratio is -4.98. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KANORICHEM.BO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to KANORICHEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check KANORICHEM.BO's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, KANORICHEM.NS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while KANORICHEM.NS trades at ₹75.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas KANORICHEM.NS's P/E ratio is -4.82. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KANORICHEM.NS's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to KANORICHEM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check KANORICHEM.NS's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, LORDSCHLO.NS has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while LORDSCHLO.NS trades at ₹126.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas LORDSCHLO.NS's P/E ratio is 12.21. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LORDSCHLO.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to LORDSCHLO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check LORDSCHLO.NS's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, DCMSRMIND.BO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while DCMSRMIND.BO trades at ₹175.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas DCMSRMIND.BO's P/E ratio is 3.63. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DCMSRMIND.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to DCMSRMIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check DCMSRMIND.BO's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, LORDSCHLO.BO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while LORDSCHLO.BO trades at ₹126.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas LORDSCHLO.BO's P/E ratio is 12.15. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LORDSCHLO.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to LORDSCHLO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check LORDSCHLO.BO's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, INDGELA.BO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while INDGELA.BO trades at ₹345.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas INDGELA.BO's P/E ratio is 9.40. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to INDGELA.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to INDGELA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check INDGELA.BO's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, OCCL.NS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while OCCL.NS trades at ₹233.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas OCCL.NS's P/E ratio is 77.52. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OCCL.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to OCCL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check OCCL.NS's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, DIAMINESQ.NS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while DIAMINESQ.NS trades at ₹238.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas DIAMINESQ.NS's P/E ratio is -46.23. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DIAMINESQ.NS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to DIAMINESQ.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check DIAMINESQ.NS's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, DIAMINESQ.BO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while DIAMINESQ.BO trades at ₹238.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas DIAMINESQ.BO's P/E ratio is -45.77. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DIAMINESQ.BO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to DIAMINESQ.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check DIAMINESQ.BO's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, JAYSYNTH.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while JAYSYNTH.BO trades at ₹12.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas JAYSYNTH.BO's P/E ratio is 14.18. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to JAYSYNTH.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to JAYSYNTH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check JAYSYNTH.BO's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, ISHANCH.NS has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while ISHANCH.NS trades at ₹60.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas ISHANCH.NS's P/E ratio is -29.82. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ISHANCH.NS's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to ISHANCH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check ISHANCH.NS's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, PAUSHAKLTD.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while PAUSHAKLTD.BO trades at ₹517.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas PAUSHAKLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 33.98. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PAUSHAKLTD.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to PAUSHAKLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check PAUSHAKLTD.BO's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, CHEMCRUX.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while CHEMCRUX.BO trades at ₹101.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas CHEMCRUX.BO's P/E ratio is 70.41. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CHEMCRUX.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to CHEMCRUX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check CHEMCRUX.BO's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, RESGEN.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while RESGEN.BO trades at ₹60.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas RESGEN.BO's P/E ratio is 15.45. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RESGEN.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to RESGEN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check RESGEN.BO's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, DEEPAKCHEM.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while DEEPAKCHEM.BO trades at ₹101.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas DEEPAKCHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 10.18. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DEEPAKCHEM.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to DEEPAKCHEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check DEEPAKCHEM.BO's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, POLYCHEM.BO has a market cap of 796M. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while POLYCHEM.BO trades at ₹1,979.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas POLYCHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 4.26. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to POLYCHEM.BO's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to POLYCHEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check POLYCHEM.BO's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, ASHOKALC.BO has a market cap of 551.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while ASHOKALC.BO trades at ₹119.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas ASHOKALC.BO's P/E ratio is -10.04. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ASHOKALC.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to ASHOKALC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check ASHOKALC.BO's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, GARODCH.BO has a market cap of 482.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while GARODCH.BO trades at ₹138.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas GARODCH.BO's P/E ratio is 2.03. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GARODCH.BO's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to GARODCH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check GARODCH.BO's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, SANGINITA.NS has a market cap of 379.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while SANGINITA.NS trades at ₹14.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas SANGINITA.NS's P/E ratio is -11.18. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SANGINITA.NS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to SANGINITA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check SANGINITA.NS's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, SHIVAAGRO.BO has a market cap of 352.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while SHIVAAGRO.BO trades at ₹30.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas SHIVAAGRO.BO's P/E ratio is 160.32. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SHIVAAGRO.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is less volatile compared to SHIVAAGRO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check SHIVAAGRO.BO's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, CAPRO.BO has a market cap of 318.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while CAPRO.BO trades at ₹69.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas CAPRO.BO's P/E ratio is 6916.00. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CAPRO.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to CAPRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check CAPRO.BO's competition here

ZR2.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZR2.BO stands at 528.9M. In comparison, VINEETLAB.NS has a market cap of 296.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ZR2.BO is priced at ₹140.05, while VINEETLAB.NS trades at ₹31.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZR2.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 988.00, whereas VINEETLAB.NS's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, ZR2.BO's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VINEETLAB.NS's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ZR2.BO is more volatile compared to VINEETLAB.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZR2.BO.Check VINEETLAB.NS's competition here