Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizers & Chemicals Limited (GNFC.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (GNFC.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GNFC.BO | ₹529.05 | -1.17% | 77.6B | 9.62 | ₹54.97 | +6.52% |
| DEEPAKNI.BO | ₹2,436.10 | +0.33% | 332.3B | 57.46 | ₹42.40 | N/A |
| DEEPAKNTR.BO | ₹1,560.20 | -0.74% | 212.9B | 29.11 | ₹53.60 | +0.48% |
| DEEPAKNTR.NS | ₹1,558.10 | -0.91% | 212.5B | 33.30 | ₹46.79 | +0.48% |
| DEEPAKFERT.NS | ₹1,649.30 | -0.90% | 208.2B | 25.74 | ₹64.08 | +0.61% |
| DEEPAKFERT.BO | ₹1,650.95 | -0.58% | 208B | 28.29 | ₹58.35 | +0.61% |
| TATACHEM.NS | ₹693.10 | +0.63% | 176.6B | 158.97 | ₹4.36 | +1.59% |
| TATACHEM.BO | ₹693.15 | +0.63% | 176.6B | 158.98 | ₹4.36 | +1.59% |
| SPLPETRO.BO | ₹726.50 | +2.19% | 137B | 41.47 | ₹17.52 | +1.38% |
| SPLPETRO.NS | ₹725.00 | +1.96% | 136.3B | 41.38 | ₹17.52 | +1.38% |
Stock Comparison
GNFC.BO vs DEEPAKNI.BO Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, DEEPAKNI.BO has a market cap of 332.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while DEEPAKNI.BO trades at ₹2,436.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas DEEPAKNI.BO's P/E ratio is 57.46. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DEEPAKNI.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to DEEPAKNI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check DEEPAKNI.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs DEEPAKNTR.BO Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, DEEPAKNTR.BO has a market cap of 212.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while DEEPAKNTR.BO trades at ₹1,560.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas DEEPAKNTR.BO's P/E ratio is 29.11. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DEEPAKNTR.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to DEEPAKNTR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check DEEPAKNTR.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs DEEPAKNTR.NS Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, DEEPAKNTR.NS has a market cap of 212.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while DEEPAKNTR.NS trades at ₹1,558.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas DEEPAKNTR.NS's P/E ratio is 33.30. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DEEPAKNTR.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to DEEPAKNTR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check DEEPAKNTR.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs DEEPAKFERT.NS Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, DEEPAKFERT.NS has a market cap of 208.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while DEEPAKFERT.NS trades at ₹1,649.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas DEEPAKFERT.NS's P/E ratio is 25.74. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DEEPAKFERT.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to DEEPAKFERT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check DEEPAKFERT.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs DEEPAKFERT.BO Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, DEEPAKFERT.BO has a market cap of 208B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while DEEPAKFERT.BO trades at ₹1,650.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas DEEPAKFERT.BO's P/E ratio is 28.29. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DEEPAKFERT.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to DEEPAKFERT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check DEEPAKFERT.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs TATACHEM.NS Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, TATACHEM.NS has a market cap of 176.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while TATACHEM.NS trades at ₹693.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas TATACHEM.NS's P/E ratio is 158.97. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TATACHEM.NS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to TATACHEM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check TATACHEM.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs TATACHEM.BO Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, TATACHEM.BO has a market cap of 176.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while TATACHEM.BO trades at ₹693.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas TATACHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 158.98. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TATACHEM.BO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to TATACHEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check TATACHEM.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs SPLPETRO.BO Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, SPLPETRO.BO has a market cap of 137B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while SPLPETRO.BO trades at ₹726.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas SPLPETRO.BO's P/E ratio is 41.47. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SPLPETRO.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to SPLPETRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check SPLPETRO.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs SPLPETRO.NS Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, SPLPETRO.NS has a market cap of 136.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while SPLPETRO.NS trades at ₹725.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas SPLPETRO.NS's P/E ratio is 41.38. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SPLPETRO.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to SPLPETRO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check SPLPETRO.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs GNFC.NS Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, GNFC.NS has a market cap of 77.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while GNFC.NS trades at ₹529.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas GNFC.NS's P/E ratio is 8.46. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GNFC.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to GNFC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check GNFC.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs INDIAGLYCO.BO Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, INDIAGLYCO.BO has a market cap of 71.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while INDIAGLYCO.BO trades at ₹1,073.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas INDIAGLYCO.BO's P/E ratio is 23.66. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to INDIAGLYCO.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to INDIAGLYCO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check INDIAGLYCO.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs ACI.NS Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, ACI.NS has a market cap of 66.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while ACI.NS trades at ₹539.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas ACI.NS's P/E ratio is 50.91. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ACI.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to ACI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check ACI.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs ACI.BO Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, ACI.BO has a market cap of 66.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while ACI.BO trades at ₹539.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas ACI.BO's P/E ratio is 53.21. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ACI.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to ACI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check ACI.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs RPEL.BO Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, RPEL.BO has a market cap of 58B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while RPEL.BO trades at ₹1,262.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas RPEL.BO's P/E ratio is 118.91. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RPEL.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to RPEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check RPEL.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs RPEL.NS Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, RPEL.NS has a market cap of 57.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while RPEL.NS trades at ₹1,261.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas RPEL.NS's P/E ratio is 105.30. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RPEL.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to RPEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check RPEL.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs GUJALKALI.BO Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, GUJALKALI.BO has a market cap of 44.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while GUJALKALI.BO trades at ₹609.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas GUJALKALI.BO's P/E ratio is -1846.36. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GUJALKALI.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to GUJALKALI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check GUJALKALI.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs GUJALKALI.NS Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, GUJALKALI.NS has a market cap of 44.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while GUJALKALI.NS trades at ₹609.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas GUJALKALI.NS's P/E ratio is -1845.45. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GUJALKALI.NS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to GUJALKALI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check GUJALKALI.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs MFL.NS Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, MFL.NS has a market cap of 44.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while MFL.NS trades at ₹1,062.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas MFL.NS's P/E ratio is 15.94. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MFL.NS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to MFL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check MFL.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs EPIGRAL.NS Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, EPIGRAL.NS has a market cap of 44.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while EPIGRAL.NS trades at ₹1,021.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas EPIGRAL.NS's P/E ratio is 13.23. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EPIGRAL.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to EPIGRAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check EPIGRAL.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs EPIGRAL.BO Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, EPIGRAL.BO has a market cap of 44B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while EPIGRAL.BO trades at ₹1,022.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas EPIGRAL.BO's P/E ratio is 13.24. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EPIGRAL.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to EPIGRAL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check EPIGRAL.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs STYRENIX.BO Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, STYRENIX.BO has a market cap of 40.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while STYRENIX.BO trades at ₹2,297.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas STYRENIX.BO's P/E ratio is 20.41. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to STYRENIX.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to STYRENIX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check STYRENIX.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs STYRENIX.NS Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, STYRENIX.NS has a market cap of 40.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while STYRENIX.NS trades at ₹2,295.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas STYRENIX.NS's P/E ratio is 44.94. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to STYRENIX.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to STYRENIX.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check STYRENIX.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs GHCL.BO Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, GHCL.BO has a market cap of 39.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while GHCL.BO trades at ₹430.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas GHCL.BO's P/E ratio is 9.01. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GHCL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to GHCL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check GHCL.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs GHCL.NS Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, GHCL.NS has a market cap of 39.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while GHCL.NS trades at ₹430.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas GHCL.NS's P/E ratio is 7.93. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GHCL.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to GHCL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check GHCL.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs ELLEN.NS Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, ELLEN.NS has a market cap of 36.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while ELLEN.NS trades at ₹261.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas ELLEN.NS's P/E ratio is 42.76. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ELLEN.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to ELLEN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check ELLEN.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs MEGH.NS Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, MEGH.NS has a market cap of 35.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while MEGH.NS trades at ₹139.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas MEGH.NS's P/E ratio is 15.63. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MEGH.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to MEGH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check MEGH.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs FOSECOIND.BO Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, FOSECOIND.BO has a market cap of 33.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while FOSECOIND.BO trades at ₹5,239.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas FOSECOIND.BO's P/E ratio is 42.82. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FOSECOIND.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to FOSECOIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check FOSECOIND.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs FOSECOIND.NS Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, FOSECOIND.NS has a market cap of 33.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while FOSECOIND.NS trades at ₹5,209.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas FOSECOIND.NS's P/E ratio is 42.58. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FOSECOIND.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to FOSECOIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check FOSECOIND.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs CHEMPLASTS.BO Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, CHEMPLASTS.BO has a market cap of 32.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while CHEMPLASTS.BO trades at ₹207.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas CHEMPLASTS.BO's P/E ratio is -11.78. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CHEMPLASTS.BO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to CHEMPLASTS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check CHEMPLASTS.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs CHEMPLASTS.NS Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, CHEMPLASTS.NS has a market cap of 32.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while CHEMPLASTS.NS trades at ₹207.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas CHEMPLASTS.NS's P/E ratio is -11.64. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CHEMPLASTS.NS's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to CHEMPLASTS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check CHEMPLASTS.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs DDEVPLASTIK.BO Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, DDEVPLASTIK.BO has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while DDEVPLASTIK.BO trades at ₹262.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas DDEVPLASTIK.BO's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DDEVPLASTIK.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to DDEVPLASTIK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check DDEVPLASTIK.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs BEPL.NS Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, BEPL.NS has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while BEPL.NS trades at ₹102.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas BEPL.NS's P/E ratio is 14.21. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BEPL.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to BEPL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check BEPL.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs SANSTAR.NS Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, SANSTAR.NS has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while SANSTAR.NS trades at ₹118.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas SANSTAR.NS's P/E ratio is 62.80. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SANSTAR.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to SANSTAR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check SANSTAR.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs DCW.BO Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, DCW.BO has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while DCW.BO trades at ₹50.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas DCW.BO's P/E ratio is 30.76. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DCW.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to DCW.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check DCW.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs DCW.NS Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, DCW.NS has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while DCW.NS trades at ₹50.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas DCW.NS's P/E ratio is 30.74. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DCW.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to DCW.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check DCW.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs INEOSSTYRO.NS Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, INEOSSTYRO.NS has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while INEOSSTYRO.NS trades at ₹807.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas INEOSSTYRO.NS's P/E ratio is 11.53. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to INEOSSTYRO.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to INEOSSTYRO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check INEOSSTYRO.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs GODAVARIB.NS Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, GODAVARIB.NS has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while GODAVARIB.NS trades at ₹272.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas GODAVARIB.NS's P/E ratio is 400.15. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GODAVARIB.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to GODAVARIB.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check GODAVARIB.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs INDOBORAX.BO Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, INDOBORAX.BO has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while INDOBORAX.BO trades at ₹393.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas INDOBORAX.BO's P/E ratio is 25.08. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to INDOBORAX.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to INDOBORAX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check INDOBORAX.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs INDOBORAX.NS Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, INDOBORAX.NS has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while INDOBORAX.NS trades at ₹392.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas INDOBORAX.NS's P/E ratio is 25.02. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to INDOBORAX.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to INDOBORAX.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check INDOBORAX.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs GULPOLY.NS Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, GULPOLY.NS has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while GULPOLY.NS trades at ₹191.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas GULPOLY.NS's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GULPOLY.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to GULPOLY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check GULPOLY.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs GULPOLY.BO Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, GULPOLY.BO has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while GULPOLY.BO trades at ₹191.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas GULPOLY.BO's P/E ratio is 11.13. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GULPOLY.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to GULPOLY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check GULPOLY.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs ANDHRSUGAR.NS Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, ANDHRSUGAR.NS has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while ANDHRSUGAR.NS trades at ₹83.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas ANDHRSUGAR.NS's P/E ratio is 17.27. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ANDHRSUGAR.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to ANDHRSUGAR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check ANDHRSUGAR.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs AMNPLST.BO Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, AMNPLST.BO has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while AMNPLST.BO trades at ₹192.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas AMNPLST.BO's P/E ratio is 29.00. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AMNPLST.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to AMNPLST.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check AMNPLST.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs GEMAROMA.NS Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, GEMAROMA.NS has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while GEMAROMA.NS trades at ₹186.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas GEMAROMA.NS's P/E ratio is 666.82. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GEMAROMA.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to GEMAROMA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check GEMAROMA.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs INDOAMIN.BO Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, INDOAMIN.BO has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while INDOAMIN.BO trades at ₹131.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas INDOAMIN.BO's P/E ratio is 12.21. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to INDOAMIN.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to INDOAMIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check INDOAMIN.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs INDOAMIN.NS Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, INDOAMIN.NS has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while INDOAMIN.NS trades at ₹130.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas INDOAMIN.NS's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to INDOAMIN.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to INDOAMIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check INDOAMIN.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs SUNSHIEL.BO Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, SUNSHIEL.BO has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while SUNSHIEL.BO trades at ₹1,203.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas SUNSHIEL.BO's P/E ratio is 56.49. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SUNSHIEL.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to SUNSHIEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check SUNSHIEL.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs SRHHYPOLTD.BO Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, SRHHYPOLTD.BO has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while SRHHYPOLTD.BO trades at ₹494.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas SRHHYPOLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 9.45. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SRHHYPOLTD.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to SRHHYPOLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check SRHHYPOLTD.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs SRHHYPOLTD.NS Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, SRHHYPOLTD.NS has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while SRHHYPOLTD.NS trades at ₹492.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas SRHHYPOLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 9.46. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SRHHYPOLTD.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to SRHHYPOLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check SRHHYPOLTD.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs ORIENTCQ.BO Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, ORIENTCQ.BO has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while ORIENTCQ.BO trades at ₹810.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas ORIENTCQ.BO's P/E ratio is 15.88. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ORIENTCQ.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to ORIENTCQ.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check ORIENTCQ.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs VALIANTORG.NS Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, VALIANTORG.NS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while VALIANTORG.NS trades at ₹278.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas VALIANTORG.NS's P/E ratio is 26.63. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VALIANTORG.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to VALIANTORG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check VALIANTORG.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs UNIENTER.NS Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, UNIENTER.NS has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while UNIENTER.NS trades at ₹107.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas UNIENTER.NS's P/E ratio is 37.72. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UNIENTER.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to UNIENTER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check UNIENTER.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs VALIANTORG.BO Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, VALIANTORG.BO has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while VALIANTORG.BO trades at ₹272.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas VALIANTORG.BO's P/E ratio is 22.99. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VALIANTORG.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to VALIANTORG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check VALIANTORG.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs DMCC.NS Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, DMCC.NS has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while DMCC.NS trades at ₹253.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas DMCC.NS's P/E ratio is 23.16. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DMCC.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to DMCC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check DMCC.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs DMCC.BO Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, DMCC.BO has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while DMCC.BO trades at ₹254.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas DMCC.BO's P/E ratio is 23.19. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DMCC.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to DMCC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check DMCC.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs OCCLLTD.NS Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, OCCLLTD.NS has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while OCCLLTD.NS trades at ₹125.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas OCCLLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 18.20. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OCCLLTD.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to OCCLLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check OCCLLTD.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs NATPEROX.BO Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, NATPEROX.BO has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while NATPEROX.BO trades at ₹1,040.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas NATPEROX.BO's P/E ratio is 399.75. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NATPEROX.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to NATPEROX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check NATPEROX.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs KANORICHEM.NS Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, KANORICHEM.NS has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while KANORICHEM.NS trades at ₹135.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas KANORICHEM.NS's P/E ratio is 25.68. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KANORICHEM.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to KANORICHEM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check KANORICHEM.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs PRIMO.NS Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, PRIMO.NS has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while PRIMO.NS trades at ₹24.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas PRIMO.NS's P/E ratio is 38.81. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PRIMO.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to PRIMO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check PRIMO.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs KANORICHEM.BO Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, KANORICHEM.BO has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while KANORICHEM.BO trades at ₹132.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas KANORICHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 25.09. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KANORICHEM.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to KANORICHEM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check KANORICHEM.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs LORDSCHLO.NS Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, LORDSCHLO.NS has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while LORDSCHLO.NS trades at ₹134.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas LORDSCHLO.NS's P/E ratio is 17.37. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LORDSCHLO.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to LORDSCHLO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check LORDSCHLO.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs A1L.BO Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, A1L.BO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while A1L.BO trades at ₹6.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas A1L.BO's P/E ratio is 38.81. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to A1L.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to A1L.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check A1L.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs DCMSRMIND.BO Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, DCMSRMIND.BO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while DCMSRMIND.BO trades at ₹175.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas DCMSRMIND.BO's P/E ratio is 3.63. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DCMSRMIND.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to DCMSRMIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check DCMSRMIND.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs DIAMINESQ.NS Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, DIAMINESQ.NS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while DIAMINESQ.NS trades at ₹267.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas DIAMINESQ.NS's P/E ratio is -20.61. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DIAMINESQ.NS's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to DIAMINESQ.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check DIAMINESQ.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs DIAMINESQ.BO Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, DIAMINESQ.BO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while DIAMINESQ.BO trades at ₹266.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas DIAMINESQ.BO's P/E ratio is -20.53. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DIAMINESQ.BO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to DIAMINESQ.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check DIAMINESQ.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs INDGELA.BO Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, INDGELA.BO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while INDGELA.BO trades at ₹367.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas INDGELA.BO's P/E ratio is 16.46. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to INDGELA.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to INDGELA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check INDGELA.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs OCCL.NS Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, OCCL.NS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while OCCL.NS trades at ₹233.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas OCCL.NS's P/E ratio is 77.52. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OCCL.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to OCCL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check OCCL.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs PAUSHAKLTD.BO Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, PAUSHAKLTD.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while PAUSHAKLTD.BO trades at ₹545.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas PAUSHAKLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 5.52. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PAUSHAKLTD.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to PAUSHAKLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check PAUSHAKLTD.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs ISHANCH.NS Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, ISHANCH.NS has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while ISHANCH.NS trades at ₹57.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas ISHANCH.NS's P/E ratio is -19.13. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ISHANCH.NS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to ISHANCH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check ISHANCH.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs CHEMCRUX.BO Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, CHEMCRUX.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while CHEMCRUX.BO trades at ₹89.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas CHEMCRUX.BO's P/E ratio is 22.69. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CHEMCRUX.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to CHEMCRUX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check CHEMCRUX.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs SANGINITA.NS Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, SANGINITA.NS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while SANGINITA.NS trades at ₹45.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas SANGINITA.NS's P/E ratio is -35.02. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SANGINITA.NS's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to SANGINITA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check SANGINITA.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs RESGEN.BO Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, RESGEN.BO has a market cap of 998.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while RESGEN.BO trades at ₹47.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas RESGEN.BO's P/E ratio is 9.80. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RESGEN.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to RESGEN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check RESGEN.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs PARAGON.NS Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, PARAGON.NS has a market cap of 963.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while PARAGON.NS trades at ₹49.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas PARAGON.NS's P/E ratio is 10.66. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PARAGON.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to PARAGON.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check PARAGON.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs DEEPAKCHEM.BO Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, DEEPAKCHEM.BO has a market cap of 869M. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while DEEPAKCHEM.BO trades at ₹79.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas DEEPAKCHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 10.26. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DEEPAKCHEM.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to DEEPAKCHEM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check DEEPAKCHEM.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs POLYCHEM.BO Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, POLYCHEM.BO has a market cap of 797.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while POLYCHEM.BO trades at ₹1,974.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas POLYCHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 11.91. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to POLYCHEM.BO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to POLYCHEM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check POLYCHEM.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs IEML.NS Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, IEML.NS has a market cap of 594.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while IEML.NS trades at ₹42.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas IEML.NS's P/E ratio is 3.58. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IEML.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to IEML.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check IEML.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs ASHOKALC.BO Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, ASHOKALC.BO has a market cap of 551.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while ASHOKALC.BO trades at ₹119.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas ASHOKALC.BO's P/E ratio is -10.04. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ASHOKALC.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to ASHOKALC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check ASHOKALC.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs GARODCH.BO Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, GARODCH.BO has a market cap of 482.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while GARODCH.BO trades at ₹138.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas GARODCH.BO's P/E ratio is -2436.07. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GARODCH.BO's ROE of -2.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to GARODCH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check GARODCH.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs SHIVAAGRO.BO Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, SHIVAAGRO.BO has a market cap of 405M. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while SHIVAAGRO.BO trades at ₹40.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas SHIVAAGRO.BO's P/E ratio is -6.22. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SHIVAAGRO.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to SHIVAAGRO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check SHIVAAGRO.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs TRELCHE-B.BO Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, TRELCHE-B.BO has a market cap of 392.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while TRELCHE-B.BO trades at ₹20.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas TRELCHE-B.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TRELCHE-B.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to TRELCHE-B.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check TRELCHE-B.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs VINEETLAB.BO Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, VINEETLAB.BO has a market cap of 317.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while VINEETLAB.BO trades at ₹34.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas VINEETLAB.BO's P/E ratio is -15.17. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VINEETLAB.BO's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to VINEETLAB.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check VINEETLAB.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs HARLETH.BO Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, HARLETH.BO has a market cap of 314.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while HARLETH.BO trades at ₹64.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas HARLETH.BO's P/E ratio is 31.22. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HARLETH.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to HARLETH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check HARLETH.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs GUJRAFFIA.NS Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, GUJRAFFIA.NS has a market cap of 221.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while GUJRAFFIA.NS trades at ₹40.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas GUJRAFFIA.NS's P/E ratio is 19.79. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GUJRAFFIA.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to GUJRAFFIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check GUJRAFFIA.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs CAPRO.BO Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, CAPRO.BO has a market cap of 215.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while CAPRO.BO trades at ₹46.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas CAPRO.BO's P/E ratio is 45.56. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CAPRO.BO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to CAPRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check CAPRO.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs UNIPHOS.BO Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, UNIPHOS.BO has a market cap of 137.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while UNIPHOS.BO trades at ₹158.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas UNIPHOS.BO's P/E ratio is 52.49. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UNIPHOS.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to UNIPHOS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check UNIPHOS.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs RITEZONE.NS Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, RITEZONE.NS has a market cap of 96M. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while RITEZONE.NS trades at ₹22.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas RITEZONE.NS's P/E ratio is 10.76. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RITEZONE.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to RITEZONE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check RITEZONE.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs CHDCHEM.BO Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, CHDCHEM.BO has a market cap of 55.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while CHDCHEM.BO trades at ₹5.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas CHDCHEM.BO's P/E ratio is -17.81. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CHDCHEM.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to CHDCHEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check CHDCHEM.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs REVAORG.BO Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, REVAORG.BO has a market cap of 22.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while REVAORG.BO trades at ₹7.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas REVAORG.BO's P/E ratio is -8.46. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to REVAORG.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to REVAORG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check REVAORG.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs SUPPETRO.NS Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, SUPPETRO.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while SUPPETRO.NS trades at ₹925.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas SUPPETRO.NS's P/E ratio is 13.11. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SUPPETRO.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to SUPPETRO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check SUPPETRO.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs ARISTO-SM.NS Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, ARISTO-SM.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while ARISTO-SM.NS trades at ₹91.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas ARISTO-SM.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ARISTO-SM.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to ARISTO-SM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check ARISTO-SM.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs CHEMFABALKA.BO Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, CHEMFABALKA.BO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while CHEMFABALKA.BO trades at ₹411.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas CHEMFABALKA.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CHEMFABALKA.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to CHEMFABALKA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check CHEMFABALKA.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs DHARAMSI.NS Comparison July 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 77.6B. In comparison, DHARAMSI.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹529.05, while DHARAMSI.NS trades at ₹363.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas DHARAMSI.NS's P/E ratio is 45.16. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DHARAMSI.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to DHARAMSI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check DHARAMSI.NS's competition here