Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizers & Chemicals Limited
Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizers & Chemicals Limited (GNFC.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (GNFC.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GNFC.BO | ₹530.75 | +2.32% | 80.3B | 12.61 | ₹43.33 | +6.32% |
| NAVINFLUOR.NS | ₹7,074.00 | +2.45% | 362.8B | 54.33 | ₹130.22 | +0.19% |
| NAVINFLUOR.BO | ₹7,083.00 | +2.53% | 362.8B | 54.34 | ₹130.21 | +0.19% |
| DEEPAKNI.BO | ₹2,436.10 | +0.33% | 332.3B | 57.46 | ₹42.40 | N/A |
| DEEPAKNTR.NS | ₹1,811.80 | +3.62% | 246.3B | 46.21 | ₹39.08 | +0.42% |
| DEEPAKNTR.BO | ₹1,809.50 | +3.52% | 246.1B | 46.15 | ₹39.10 | +0.42% |
| TATACHEM.BO | ₹730.20 | +0.03% | 187.7B | 115.28 | ₹6.39 | +1.49% |
| TATACHEM.NS | ₹729.00 | -0.18% | 187.6B | -9.89 | -₹74.44 | +1.49% |
| DEEPAKFERT.BO | ₹1,318.60 | +3.61% | 167.2B | 19.12 | ₹69.28 | +0.76% |
| DEEPAKFERT.NS | ₹1,317.60 | +3.55% | 167.2B | 19.10 | ₹69.35 | +0.76% |
Stock Comparison
GNFC.BO vs NAVINFLUOR.NS Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, NAVINFLUOR.NS has a market cap of 362.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while NAVINFLUOR.NS trades at ₹7,074.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas NAVINFLUOR.NS's P/E ratio is 54.33. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NAVINFLUOR.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to NAVINFLUOR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check NAVINFLUOR.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs NAVINFLUOR.BO Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, NAVINFLUOR.BO has a market cap of 362.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while NAVINFLUOR.BO trades at ₹7,083.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas NAVINFLUOR.BO's P/E ratio is 54.34. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NAVINFLUOR.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to NAVINFLUOR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check NAVINFLUOR.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs DEEPAKNI.BO Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, DEEPAKNI.BO has a market cap of 332.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while DEEPAKNI.BO trades at ₹2,436.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas DEEPAKNI.BO's P/E ratio is 57.46. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DEEPAKNI.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to DEEPAKNI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check DEEPAKNI.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs DEEPAKNTR.NS Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, DEEPAKNTR.NS has a market cap of 246.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while DEEPAKNTR.NS trades at ₹1,811.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas DEEPAKNTR.NS's P/E ratio is 46.21. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DEEPAKNTR.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to DEEPAKNTR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check DEEPAKNTR.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs DEEPAKNTR.BO Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, DEEPAKNTR.BO has a market cap of 246.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while DEEPAKNTR.BO trades at ₹1,809.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas DEEPAKNTR.BO's P/E ratio is 46.15. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DEEPAKNTR.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to DEEPAKNTR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check DEEPAKNTR.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs TATACHEM.BO Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, TATACHEM.BO has a market cap of 187.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while TATACHEM.BO trades at ₹730.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas TATACHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 115.28. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TATACHEM.BO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to TATACHEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check TATACHEM.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs TATACHEM.NS Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, TATACHEM.NS has a market cap of 187.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while TATACHEM.NS trades at ₹729.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas TATACHEM.NS's P/E ratio is -9.89. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TATACHEM.NS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to TATACHEM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check TATACHEM.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs DEEPAKFERT.BO Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, DEEPAKFERT.BO has a market cap of 167.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while DEEPAKFERT.BO trades at ₹1,318.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas DEEPAKFERT.BO's P/E ratio is 19.12. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DEEPAKFERT.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to DEEPAKFERT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check DEEPAKFERT.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs DEEPAKFERT.NS Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, DEEPAKFERT.NS has a market cap of 167.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while DEEPAKFERT.NS trades at ₹1,317.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas DEEPAKFERT.NS's P/E ratio is 19.10. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DEEPAKFERT.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to DEEPAKFERT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check DEEPAKFERT.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs SPLPETRO.BO Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, SPLPETRO.BO has a market cap of 133B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while SPLPETRO.BO trades at ₹695.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas SPLPETRO.BO's P/E ratio is 40.35. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SPLPETRO.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to SPLPETRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check SPLPETRO.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs SPLPETRO.NS Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, SPLPETRO.NS has a market cap of 132.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while SPLPETRO.NS trades at ₹693.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas SPLPETRO.NS's P/E ratio is 40.32. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SPLPETRO.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to SPLPETRO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check SPLPETRO.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs GNFC.NS Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, GNFC.NS has a market cap of 80.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while GNFC.NS trades at ₹531.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas GNFC.NS's P/E ratio is 9.93. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GNFC.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to GNFC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check GNFC.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs INDIAGLYCO.BO Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, INDIAGLYCO.BO has a market cap of 66.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while INDIAGLYCO.BO trades at ₹995.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas INDIAGLYCO.BO's P/E ratio is 23.85. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to INDIAGLYCO.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to INDIAGLYCO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check INDIAGLYCO.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs INDIAGLYCO.NS Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, INDIAGLYCO.NS has a market cap of 66.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while INDIAGLYCO.NS trades at ₹998.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas INDIAGLYCO.NS's P/E ratio is 23.10. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to INDIAGLYCO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check INDIAGLYCO.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs ACI.BO Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, ACI.BO has a market cap of 66.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while ACI.BO trades at ₹530.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas ACI.BO's P/E ratio is 62.30. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ACI.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to ACI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check ACI.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs ACI.NS Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, ACI.NS has a market cap of 66.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while ACI.NS trades at ₹530.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas ACI.NS's P/E ratio is 62.29. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ACI.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to ACI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check ACI.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs EPIGRAL.NS Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, EPIGRAL.NS has a market cap of 53.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while EPIGRAL.NS trades at ₹1,236.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas EPIGRAL.NS's P/E ratio is 16.10. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EPIGRAL.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to EPIGRAL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check EPIGRAL.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs EPIGRAL.BO Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, EPIGRAL.BO has a market cap of 53.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while EPIGRAL.BO trades at ₹1,234.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas EPIGRAL.BO's P/E ratio is 16.09. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EPIGRAL.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to EPIGRAL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check EPIGRAL.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs RAIN.NS Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, RAIN.NS has a market cap of 51.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while RAIN.NS trades at ₹152.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas RAIN.NS's P/E ratio is 17.13. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RAIN.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to RAIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check RAIN.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs RAIN.BO Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, RAIN.BO has a market cap of 51.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while RAIN.BO trades at ₹152.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas RAIN.BO's P/E ratio is 17.13. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RAIN.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to RAIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check RAIN.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs GUJALKALI.BO Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, GUJALKALI.BO has a market cap of 51.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while GUJALKALI.BO trades at ₹685.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas GUJALKALI.BO's P/E ratio is -601.77. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GUJALKALI.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to GUJALKALI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check GUJALKALI.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs GUJALKALI.NS Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, GUJALKALI.NS has a market cap of 51.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while GUJALKALI.NS trades at ₹686.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas GUJALKALI.NS's P/E ratio is -601.64. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GUJALKALI.NS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to GUJALKALI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check GUJALKALI.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs MFL.NS Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, MFL.NS has a market cap of 44.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while MFL.NS trades at ₹1,062.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas MFL.NS's P/E ratio is 15.94. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MFL.NS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to MFL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check MFL.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs RPEL.NS Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, RPEL.NS has a market cap of 42.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while RPEL.NS trades at ₹906.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas RPEL.NS's P/E ratio is 76.61. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RPEL.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to RPEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check RPEL.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs RPEL.BO Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, RPEL.BO has a market cap of 42.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while RPEL.BO trades at ₹903.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas RPEL.BO's P/E ratio is 76.52. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RPEL.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to RPEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check RPEL.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs GHCL.BO Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, GHCL.BO has a market cap of 41.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while GHCL.BO trades at ₹447.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas GHCL.BO's P/E ratio is 8.58. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GHCL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to GHCL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check GHCL.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs GHCL.NS Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, GHCL.NS has a market cap of 41.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while GHCL.NS trades at ₹446.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas GHCL.NS's P/E ratio is 9.08. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GHCL.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to GHCL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check GHCL.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs STYRENIX.NS Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, STYRENIX.NS has a market cap of 39.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while STYRENIX.NS trades at ₹2,223.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas STYRENIX.NS's P/E ratio is 24.10. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to STYRENIX.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to STYRENIX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check STYRENIX.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs STYRENIX.BO Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, STYRENIX.BO has a market cap of 39.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while STYRENIX.BO trades at ₹2,214.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas STYRENIX.BO's P/E ratio is 24.04. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to STYRENIX.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to STYRENIX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check STYRENIX.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs ELLEN.NS Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, ELLEN.NS has a market cap of 39.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while ELLEN.NS trades at ₹277.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas ELLEN.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ELLEN.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to ELLEN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check ELLEN.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs CHEMPLASTS.BO Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, CHEMPLASTS.BO has a market cap of 36.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while CHEMPLASTS.BO trades at ₹227.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas CHEMPLASTS.BO's P/E ratio is -12.76. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CHEMPLASTS.BO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to CHEMPLASTS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check CHEMPLASTS.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs CHEMPLASTS.NS Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, CHEMPLASTS.NS has a market cap of 36.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while CHEMPLASTS.NS trades at ₹226.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas CHEMPLASTS.NS's P/E ratio is -12.75. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CHEMPLASTS.NS's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to CHEMPLASTS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check CHEMPLASTS.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs MEGH.NS Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, MEGH.NS has a market cap of 35.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while MEGH.NS trades at ₹139.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas MEGH.NS's P/E ratio is 15.63. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MEGH.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to MEGH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check MEGH.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs FOSECOIND.NS Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, FOSECOIND.NS has a market cap of 31.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while FOSECOIND.NS trades at ₹4,892.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas FOSECOIND.NS's P/E ratio is 44.26. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FOSECOIND.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to FOSECOIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check FOSECOIND.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs FOSECOIND.BO Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, FOSECOIND.BO has a market cap of 31.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while FOSECOIND.BO trades at ₹4,935.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas FOSECOIND.BO's P/E ratio is 39.36. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FOSECOIND.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to FOSECOIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check FOSECOIND.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs DDEVPLASTIK.BO Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, DDEVPLASTIK.BO has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while DDEVPLASTIK.BO trades at ₹262.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas DDEVPLASTIK.BO's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DDEVPLASTIK.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to DDEVPLASTIK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check DDEVPLASTIK.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs BEPL.NS Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, BEPL.NS has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while BEPL.NS trades at ₹93.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas BEPL.NS's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BEPL.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to BEPL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check BEPL.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs BEPL.BO Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, BEPL.BO has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while BEPL.BO trades at ₹93.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas BEPL.BO's P/E ratio is 14.06. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BEPL.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to BEPL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check BEPL.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs SANSTAR.NS Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, SANSTAR.NS has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while SANSTAR.NS trades at ₹111.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas SANSTAR.NS's P/E ratio is 107.69. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SANSTAR.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to SANSTAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check SANSTAR.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs GODAVARIB.NS Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, GODAVARIB.NS has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while GODAVARIB.NS trades at ₹311.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas GODAVARIB.NS's P/E ratio is 45.59. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GODAVARIB.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to GODAVARIB.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check GODAVARIB.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs INEOSSTYRO.NS Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, INEOSSTYRO.NS has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while INEOSSTYRO.NS trades at ₹807.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas INEOSSTYRO.NS's P/E ratio is 11.53. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to INEOSSTYRO.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to INEOSSTYRO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check INEOSSTYRO.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs DCW.BO Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, DCW.BO has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while DCW.BO trades at ₹45.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas DCW.BO's P/E ratio is 27.35. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DCW.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to DCW.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check DCW.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs DCW.NS Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, DCW.NS has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while DCW.NS trades at ₹45.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas DCW.NS's P/E ratio is 28.32. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DCW.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to DCW.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check DCW.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs PUNJABCHEM.BO Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, PUNJABCHEM.BO has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while PUNJABCHEM.BO trades at ₹1,010.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas PUNJABCHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 19.45. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PUNJABCHEM.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to PUNJABCHEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check PUNJABCHEM.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs PUNJABCHEM.NS Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, PUNJABCHEM.NS has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while PUNJABCHEM.NS trades at ₹1,010.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas PUNJABCHEM.NS's P/E ratio is 19.40. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PUNJABCHEM.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to PUNJABCHEM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check PUNJABCHEM.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs ANDHRSUGAR.NS Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, ANDHRSUGAR.NS has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while ANDHRSUGAR.NS trades at ₹90.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas ANDHRSUGAR.NS's P/E ratio is 14.74. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ANDHRSUGAR.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to ANDHRSUGAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check ANDHRSUGAR.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs ANDHRSUGAR.BO Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, ANDHRSUGAR.BO has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while ANDHRSUGAR.BO trades at ₹90.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas ANDHRSUGAR.BO's P/E ratio is 14.71. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ANDHRSUGAR.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to ANDHRSUGAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check ANDHRSUGAR.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs GULPOLY.NS Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, GULPOLY.NS has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while GULPOLY.NS trades at ₹192.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas GULPOLY.NS's P/E ratio is 15.45. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GULPOLY.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to GULPOLY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check GULPOLY.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs GULPOLY.BO Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, GULPOLY.BO has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while GULPOLY.BO trades at ₹192.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas GULPOLY.BO's P/E ratio is 15.43. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GULPOLY.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to GULPOLY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check GULPOLY.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs AMNPLST.BO Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, AMNPLST.BO has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while AMNPLST.BO trades at ₹197.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas AMNPLST.BO's P/E ratio is 31.91. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AMNPLST.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to AMNPLST.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check AMNPLST.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs AMNPLST.NS Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, AMNPLST.NS has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while AMNPLST.NS trades at ₹197.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas AMNPLST.NS's P/E ratio is 31.98. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AMNPLST.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to AMNPLST.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check AMNPLST.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs INDOAMIN.BO Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, INDOAMIN.BO has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while INDOAMIN.BO trades at ₹128.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas INDOAMIN.BO's P/E ratio is 12.82. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to INDOAMIN.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to INDOAMIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check INDOAMIN.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs INDOAMIN.NS Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, INDOAMIN.NS has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while INDOAMIN.NS trades at ₹128.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas INDOAMIN.NS's P/E ratio is 12.78. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to INDOAMIN.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to INDOAMIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check INDOAMIN.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs INDOBORAX.NS Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, INDOBORAX.NS has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while INDOBORAX.NS trades at ₹275.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas INDOBORAX.NS's P/E ratio is 19.33. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to INDOBORAX.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to INDOBORAX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check INDOBORAX.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs INDOBORAX.BO Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, INDOBORAX.BO has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while INDOBORAX.BO trades at ₹276.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas INDOBORAX.BO's P/E ratio is 19.32. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to INDOBORAX.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to INDOBORAX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check INDOBORAX.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs SRHHYPOLTD.NS Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, SRHHYPOLTD.NS has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while SRHHYPOLTD.NS trades at ₹507.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas SRHHYPOLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 9.26. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SRHHYPOLTD.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to SRHHYPOLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check SRHHYPOLTD.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs SRHHYPOLTD.BO Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, SRHHYPOLTD.BO has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while SRHHYPOLTD.BO trades at ₹502.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas SRHHYPOLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 9.24. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SRHHYPOLTD.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to SRHHYPOLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check SRHHYPOLTD.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs VALIANTORG.NS Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, VALIANTORG.NS has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while VALIANTORG.NS trades at ₹294.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas VALIANTORG.NS's P/E ratio is 35.15. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VALIANTORG.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to VALIANTORG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check VALIANTORG.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs VALIANTORG.BO Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, VALIANTORG.BO has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while VALIANTORG.BO trades at ₹294.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas VALIANTORG.BO's P/E ratio is 35.09. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VALIANTORG.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to VALIANTORG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check VALIANTORG.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs GEMAROMA.NS Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, GEMAROMA.NS has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while GEMAROMA.NS trades at ₹157.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas GEMAROMA.NS's P/E ratio is 29.07. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GEMAROMA.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to GEMAROMA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check GEMAROMA.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs ORIENTCQ.BO Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, ORIENTCQ.BO has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while ORIENTCQ.BO trades at ₹810.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas ORIENTCQ.BO's P/E ratio is 15.88. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ORIENTCQ.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to ORIENTCQ.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check ORIENTCQ.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs DMCC.BO Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, DMCC.BO has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while DMCC.BO trades at ₹286.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas DMCC.BO's P/E ratio is 28.25. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DMCC.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to DMCC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check DMCC.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs DMCC.NS Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, DMCC.NS has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while DMCC.NS trades at ₹283.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas DMCC.NS's P/E ratio is 28.24. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DMCC.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to DMCC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check DMCC.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs UNIENTER.NS Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, UNIENTER.NS has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while UNIENTER.NS trades at ₹108.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas UNIENTER.NS's P/E ratio is 36.78. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UNIENTER.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to UNIENTER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check UNIENTER.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs SUNSHIEL.BO Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, SUNSHIEL.BO has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while SUNSHIEL.BO trades at ₹851.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas SUNSHIEL.BO's P/E ratio is 26.43. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SUNSHIEL.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to SUNSHIEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check SUNSHIEL.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs NATPEROX.BO Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, NATPEROX.BO has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while NATPEROX.BO trades at ₹1,040.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas NATPEROX.BO's P/E ratio is 399.75. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NATPEROX.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to NATPEROX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check NATPEROX.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs PRIMO.NS Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, PRIMO.NS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while PRIMO.NS trades at ₹22.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas PRIMO.NS's P/E ratio is 36.40. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PRIMO.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to PRIMO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check PRIMO.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs OCCLLTD.NS Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, OCCLLTD.NS has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while OCCLLTD.NS trades at ₹93.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas OCCLLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 12.75. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OCCLLTD.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to OCCLLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check OCCLLTD.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs A1L.BO Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, A1L.BO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while A1L.BO trades at ₹9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas A1L.BO's P/E ratio is 121.25. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to A1L.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to A1L.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check A1L.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs KANORICHEM.BO Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, KANORICHEM.BO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while KANORICHEM.BO trades at ₹91.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas KANORICHEM.BO's P/E ratio is -5.64. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KANORICHEM.BO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to KANORICHEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check KANORICHEM.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs LORDSCHLO.BO Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, LORDSCHLO.BO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while LORDSCHLO.BO trades at ₹137.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas LORDSCHLO.BO's P/E ratio is 13.85. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LORDSCHLO.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to LORDSCHLO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check LORDSCHLO.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs LORDSCHLO.NS Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, LORDSCHLO.NS has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while LORDSCHLO.NS trades at ₹137.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas LORDSCHLO.NS's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LORDSCHLO.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to LORDSCHLO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check LORDSCHLO.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs KANORICHEM.NS Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, KANORICHEM.NS has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while KANORICHEM.NS trades at ₹88.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas KANORICHEM.NS's P/E ratio is -5.31. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KANORICHEM.NS's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to KANORICHEM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check KANORICHEM.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs NAPEROL.BO Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, NAPEROL.BO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while NAPEROL.BO trades at ₹609.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas NAPEROL.BO's P/E ratio is 31.98. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NAPEROL.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO and NAPEROL.BO have similar daily volatility (2.46).Check NAPEROL.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs DCMSRMIND.BO Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, DCMSRMIND.BO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while DCMSRMIND.BO trades at ₹175.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas DCMSRMIND.BO's P/E ratio is 3.63. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DCMSRMIND.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to DCMSRMIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check DCMSRMIND.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs INDGELA.BO Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, INDGELA.BO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while INDGELA.BO trades at ₹396.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas INDGELA.BO's P/E ratio is 10.47. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to INDGELA.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to INDGELA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check INDGELA.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs DIAMINESQ.NS Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, DIAMINESQ.NS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while DIAMINESQ.NS trades at ₹264.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas DIAMINESQ.NS's P/E ratio is -27.81. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DIAMINESQ.NS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to DIAMINESQ.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check DIAMINESQ.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs DIAMINESQ.BO Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, DIAMINESQ.BO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while DIAMINESQ.BO trades at ₹266.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas DIAMINESQ.BO's P/E ratio is -27.77. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DIAMINESQ.BO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to DIAMINESQ.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check DIAMINESQ.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs OCCL.NS Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, OCCL.NS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while OCCL.NS trades at ₹233.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas OCCL.NS's P/E ratio is 77.52. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OCCL.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to OCCL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check OCCL.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs ISHANCH.NS Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, ISHANCH.NS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while ISHANCH.NS trades at ₹61.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas ISHANCH.NS's P/E ratio is -14.39. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ISHANCH.NS's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to ISHANCH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check ISHANCH.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs JAYSYNTH.BO Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, JAYSYNTH.BO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while JAYSYNTH.BO trades at ₹12.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas JAYSYNTH.BO's P/E ratio is 13.32. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JAYSYNTH.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to JAYSYNTH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check JAYSYNTH.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs PAUSHAKLTD.BO Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, PAUSHAKLTD.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while PAUSHAKLTD.BO trades at ₹450.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas PAUSHAKLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 28.54. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PAUSHAKLTD.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to PAUSHAKLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check PAUSHAKLTD.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs CHEMCRUX.BO Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, CHEMCRUX.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while CHEMCRUX.BO trades at ₹87.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas CHEMCRUX.BO's P/E ratio is 62.64. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CHEMCRUX.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to CHEMCRUX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check CHEMCRUX.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs RESGEN.BO Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, RESGEN.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while RESGEN.BO trades at ₹60.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas RESGEN.BO's P/E ratio is 15.81. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RESGEN.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to RESGEN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check RESGEN.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs DEEPAKCHEM.BO Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, DEEPAKCHEM.BO has a market cap of 966.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while DEEPAKCHEM.BO trades at ₹89.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas DEEPAKCHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 8.63. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DEEPAKCHEM.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to DEEPAKCHEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check DEEPAKCHEM.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs PARAGON.NS Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, PARAGON.NS has a market cap of 836.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while PARAGON.NS trades at ₹42.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas PARAGON.NS's P/E ratio is 9.76. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PARAGON.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to PARAGON.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check PARAGON.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs POLYCHEM.BO Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, POLYCHEM.BO has a market cap of 804.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while POLYCHEM.BO trades at ₹1,991.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas POLYCHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 4.31. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to POLYCHEM.BO's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to POLYCHEM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check POLYCHEM.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs IEML.NS Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, IEML.NS has a market cap of 716.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while IEML.NS trades at ₹52.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas IEML.NS's P/E ratio is 4.32. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IEML.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to IEML.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check IEML.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs SANGINITA.NS Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, SANGINITA.NS has a market cap of 646.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while SANGINITA.NS trades at ₹25.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas SANGINITA.NS's P/E ratio is -19.05. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SANGINITA.NS's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to SANGINITA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check SANGINITA.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs ASHOKALC.BO Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, ASHOKALC.BO has a market cap of 551.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while ASHOKALC.BO trades at ₹119.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas ASHOKALC.BO's P/E ratio is -10.04. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ASHOKALC.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to ASHOKALC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check ASHOKALC.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs ZR2.BO Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, ZR2.BO has a market cap of 521.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while ZR2.BO trades at ₹144.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas ZR2.BO's P/E ratio is 561.54. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ZR2.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to ZR2.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check ZR2.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs GARODCH.BO Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, GARODCH.BO has a market cap of 482.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while GARODCH.BO trades at ₹138.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas GARODCH.BO's P/E ratio is 76.21. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GARODCH.BO's ROE of -1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to GARODCH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check GARODCH.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs SHIVAAGRO.BO Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, SHIVAAGRO.BO has a market cap of 395.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while SHIVAAGRO.BO trades at ₹39.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas SHIVAAGRO.BO's P/E ratio is 180.09. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SHIVAAGRO.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to SHIVAAGRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check SHIVAAGRO.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs TRELCHE-B.BO Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, TRELCHE-B.BO has a market cap of 392.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while TRELCHE-B.BO trades at ₹20.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas TRELCHE-B.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TRELCHE-B.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to TRELCHE-B.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check TRELCHE-B.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs HARLETH.BO Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, HARLETH.BO has a market cap of 338.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while HARLETH.BO trades at ₹69.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas HARLETH.BO's P/E ratio is 13.61. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HARLETH.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to HARLETH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check HARLETH.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs VINEETLAB.BO Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, VINEETLAB.BO has a market cap of 319.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while VINEETLAB.BO trades at ₹34.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas VINEETLAB.BO's P/E ratio is -4.61. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VINEETLAB.BO's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to VINEETLAB.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check VINEETLAB.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs VINEETLAB.NS Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, VINEETLAB.NS has a market cap of 317.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while VINEETLAB.NS trades at ₹35.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas VINEETLAB.NS's P/E ratio is -4.58. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VINEETLAB.NS's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to VINEETLAB.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check VINEETLAB.NS's competition here
GNFC.BO vs CAPRO.BO Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, CAPRO.BO has a market cap of 218M. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while CAPRO.BO trades at ₹47.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas CAPRO.BO's P/E ratio is 46.01. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CAPRO.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is more volatile compared to CAPRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check CAPRO.BO's competition here
GNFC.BO vs GUJRAFFIA.NS Comparison May 2026
GNFC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNFC.BO stands at 80.3B. In comparison, GUJRAFFIA.NS has a market cap of 205.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GNFC.BO is priced at ₹530.75, while GUJRAFFIA.NS trades at ₹37.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNFC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas GUJRAFFIA.NS's P/E ratio is 18.34. In terms of profitability, GNFC.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GUJRAFFIA.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GNFC.BO is less volatile compared to GUJRAFFIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNFC.BO.Check GUJRAFFIA.NS's competition here