Archean Chemical Industries Limited
Archean Chemical Industries Limited (ACI.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ACI.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACI.NS | ₹521.85 | -3.15% | 64.4B | 60.29 | ₹8.65 | +0.77% |
| NAVINFLUOR.NS | ₹7,118.50 | +0.61% | 361.3B | 54.00 | ₹130.50 | +0.19% |
| NAVINFLUOR.BO | ₹7,123.90 | +0.68% | 360.8B | 53.89 | ₹130.57 | +0.19% |
| DEEPAKNI.BO | ₹2,436.10 | +0.33% | 332.3B | 57.46 | ₹42.40 | N/A |
| DEEPAKNTR.BO | ₹1,784.00 | -1.13% | 248.8B | 45.13 | ₹40.42 | +0.41% |
| DEEPAKNTR.NS | ₹1,785.30 | -1.14% | 248.8B | 45.09 | ₹40.45 | +0.41% |
| TATACHEM.BO | ₹756.00 | +2.63% | 186B | 114.24 | ₹6.39 | +1.51% |
| TATACHEM.NS | ₹755.10 | +2.57% | 186B | -9.81 | -₹74.44 | +1.51% |
| DEEPAKFERT.NS | ₹1,383.70 | +4.47% | 166.4B | 19.00 | ₹69.35 | +0.76% |
| DEEPAKFERT.BO | ₹1,384.15 | +4.50% | 166.3B | 19.02 | ₹69.28 | +0.76% |
Stock Comparison
ACI.NS vs NAVINFLUOR.NS Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, NAVINFLUOR.NS has a market cap of 361.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while NAVINFLUOR.NS trades at ₹7,118.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas NAVINFLUOR.NS's P/E ratio is 54.00. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NAVINFLUOR.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is more volatile compared to NAVINFLUOR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check NAVINFLUOR.NS's competition here
ACI.NS vs NAVINFLUOR.BO Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, NAVINFLUOR.BO has a market cap of 360.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while NAVINFLUOR.BO trades at ₹7,123.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas NAVINFLUOR.BO's P/E ratio is 53.89. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NAVINFLUOR.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is more volatile compared to NAVINFLUOR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check NAVINFLUOR.BO's competition here
ACI.NS vs DEEPAKNI.BO Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, DEEPAKNI.BO has a market cap of 332.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while DEEPAKNI.BO trades at ₹2,436.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas DEEPAKNI.BO's P/E ratio is 57.46. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DEEPAKNI.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is more volatile compared to DEEPAKNI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check DEEPAKNI.BO's competition here
ACI.NS vs DEEPAKNTR.BO Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, DEEPAKNTR.BO has a market cap of 248.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while DEEPAKNTR.BO trades at ₹1,784.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas DEEPAKNTR.BO's P/E ratio is 45.13. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DEEPAKNTR.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is less volatile compared to DEEPAKNTR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check DEEPAKNTR.BO's competition here
ACI.NS vs DEEPAKNTR.NS Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, DEEPAKNTR.NS has a market cap of 248.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while DEEPAKNTR.NS trades at ₹1,785.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas DEEPAKNTR.NS's P/E ratio is 45.09. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DEEPAKNTR.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is less volatile compared to DEEPAKNTR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check DEEPAKNTR.NS's competition here
ACI.NS vs TATACHEM.BO Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, TATACHEM.BO has a market cap of 186B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while TATACHEM.BO trades at ₹756.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas TATACHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 114.24. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TATACHEM.BO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is less volatile compared to TATACHEM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check TATACHEM.BO's competition here
ACI.NS vs TATACHEM.NS Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, TATACHEM.NS has a market cap of 186B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while TATACHEM.NS trades at ₹755.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas TATACHEM.NS's P/E ratio is -9.81. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TATACHEM.NS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is less volatile compared to TATACHEM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check TATACHEM.NS's competition here
ACI.NS vs DEEPAKFERT.NS Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, DEEPAKFERT.NS has a market cap of 166.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while DEEPAKFERT.NS trades at ₹1,383.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas DEEPAKFERT.NS's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DEEPAKFERT.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is less volatile compared to DEEPAKFERT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check DEEPAKFERT.NS's competition here
ACI.NS vs DEEPAKFERT.BO Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, DEEPAKFERT.BO has a market cap of 166.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while DEEPAKFERT.BO trades at ₹1,384.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas DEEPAKFERT.BO's P/E ratio is 19.02. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DEEPAKFERT.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is less volatile compared to DEEPAKFERT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check DEEPAKFERT.BO's competition here
ACI.NS vs SPLPETRO.NS Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, SPLPETRO.NS has a market cap of 129.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while SPLPETRO.NS trades at ₹689.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas SPLPETRO.NS's P/E ratio is 38.49. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SPLPETRO.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is more volatile compared to SPLPETRO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check SPLPETRO.NS's competition here
ACI.NS vs SPLPETRO.BO Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, SPLPETRO.BO has a market cap of 129.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while SPLPETRO.BO trades at ₹689.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas SPLPETRO.BO's P/E ratio is 38.29. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SPLPETRO.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is more volatile compared to SPLPETRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check SPLPETRO.BO's competition here
ACI.NS vs GNFC.BO Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, GNFC.BO has a market cap of 76.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while GNFC.BO trades at ₹522.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas GNFC.BO's P/E ratio is 12.01. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GNFC.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is less volatile compared to GNFC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check GNFC.BO's competition here
ACI.NS vs GNFC.NS Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, GNFC.NS has a market cap of 76.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while GNFC.NS trades at ₹522.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas GNFC.NS's P/E ratio is 9.47. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GNFC.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is less volatile compared to GNFC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check GNFC.NS's competition here
ACI.NS vs INDIAGLYCO.BO Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, INDIAGLYCO.BO has a market cap of 66.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while INDIAGLYCO.BO trades at ₹997.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas INDIAGLYCO.BO's P/E ratio is 23.73. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to INDIAGLYCO.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is less volatile compared to INDIAGLYCO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check INDIAGLYCO.BO's competition here
ACI.NS vs INDIAGLYCO.NS Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, INDIAGLYCO.NS has a market cap of 66.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while INDIAGLYCO.NS trades at ₹997.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas INDIAGLYCO.NS's P/E ratio is 21.59. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is less volatile compared to INDIAGLYCO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check INDIAGLYCO.NS's competition here
ACI.NS vs ACI.BO Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, ACI.BO has a market cap of 64.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while ACI.BO trades at ₹521.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas ACI.BO's P/E ratio is 60.15. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ACI.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is more volatile compared to ACI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check ACI.BO's competition here
ACI.NS vs EPIGRAL.BO Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, EPIGRAL.BO has a market cap of 53.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while EPIGRAL.BO trades at ₹1,270.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas EPIGRAL.BO's P/E ratio is 16.13. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EPIGRAL.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is less volatile compared to EPIGRAL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check EPIGRAL.BO's competition here
ACI.NS vs EPIGRAL.NS Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, EPIGRAL.NS has a market cap of 53.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while EPIGRAL.NS trades at ₹1,270.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas EPIGRAL.NS's P/E ratio is 16.12. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EPIGRAL.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is less volatile compared to EPIGRAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check EPIGRAL.NS's competition here
ACI.NS vs GUJALKALI.NS Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, GUJALKALI.NS has a market cap of 52.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while GUJALKALI.NS trades at ₹708.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas GUJALKALI.NS's P/E ratio is -618.32. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GUJALKALI.NS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is less volatile compared to GUJALKALI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check GUJALKALI.NS's competition here
ACI.NS vs GUJALKALI.BO Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, GUJALKALI.BO has a market cap of 52.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while GUJALKALI.BO trades at ₹713.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas GUJALKALI.BO's P/E ratio is -618.28. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GUJALKALI.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is less volatile compared to GUJALKALI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check GUJALKALI.BO's competition here
ACI.NS vs RAIN.NS Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, RAIN.NS has a market cap of 51.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while RAIN.NS trades at ₹153.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas RAIN.NS's P/E ratio is 17.06. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RAIN.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is less volatile compared to RAIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check RAIN.NS's competition here
ACI.NS vs RAIN.BO Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, RAIN.BO has a market cap of 51.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while RAIN.BO trades at ₹153.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas RAIN.BO's P/E ratio is 17.04. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RAIN.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is less volatile compared to RAIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check RAIN.BO's competition here
ACI.NS vs MFL.NS Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, MFL.NS has a market cap of 44.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while MFL.NS trades at ₹1,062.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas MFL.NS's P/E ratio is 15.94. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MFL.NS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is less volatile compared to MFL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check MFL.NS's competition here
ACI.NS vs GHCL.NS Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, GHCL.NS has a market cap of 41.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while GHCL.NS trades at ₹454.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas GHCL.NS's P/E ratio is 9.08. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GHCL.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is more volatile compared to GHCL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check GHCL.NS's competition here
ACI.NS vs GHCL.BO Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, GHCL.BO has a market cap of 41.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while GHCL.BO trades at ₹453.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas GHCL.BO's P/E ratio is 8.56. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GHCL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is more volatile compared to GHCL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check GHCL.BO's competition here
ACI.NS vs RPEL.NS Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, RPEL.NS has a market cap of 41.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while RPEL.NS trades at ₹920.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas RPEL.NS's P/E ratio is 76.40. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RPEL.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is less volatile compared to RPEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check RPEL.NS's competition here
ACI.NS vs RPEL.BO Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, RPEL.BO has a market cap of 41.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while RPEL.BO trades at ₹917.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas RPEL.BO's P/E ratio is 76.12. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RPEL.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is less volatile compared to RPEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check RPEL.BO's competition here
ACI.NS vs ELLEN.NS Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, ELLEN.NS has a market cap of 39.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while ELLEN.NS trades at ₹287.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas ELLEN.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ELLEN.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is less volatile compared to ELLEN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check ELLEN.NS's competition here
ACI.NS vs STYRENIX.NS Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, STYRENIX.NS has a market cap of 38.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while STYRENIX.NS trades at ₹2,198.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas STYRENIX.NS's P/E ratio is 23.46. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to STYRENIX.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is more volatile compared to STYRENIX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check STYRENIX.NS's competition here
ACI.NS vs STYRENIX.BO Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, STYRENIX.BO has a market cap of 38.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while STYRENIX.BO trades at ₹2,198.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas STYRENIX.BO's P/E ratio is 23.45. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to STYRENIX.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is more volatile compared to STYRENIX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check STYRENIX.BO's competition here
ACI.NS vs CHEMPLASTS.NS Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, CHEMPLASTS.NS has a market cap of 35.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while CHEMPLASTS.NS trades at ₹226.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas CHEMPLASTS.NS's P/E ratio is -12.49. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CHEMPLASTS.NS's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is less volatile compared to CHEMPLASTS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check CHEMPLASTS.NS's competition here
ACI.NS vs CHEMPLASTS.BO Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, CHEMPLASTS.BO has a market cap of 35.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while CHEMPLASTS.BO trades at ₹227.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas CHEMPLASTS.BO's P/E ratio is -12.49. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CHEMPLASTS.BO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is less volatile compared to CHEMPLASTS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check CHEMPLASTS.BO's competition here
ACI.NS vs MEGH.NS Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, MEGH.NS has a market cap of 35.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while MEGH.NS trades at ₹139.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas MEGH.NS's P/E ratio is 15.63. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MEGH.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is less volatile compared to MEGH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check MEGH.NS's competition here
ACI.NS vs FOSECOIND.NS Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, FOSECOIND.NS has a market cap of 33.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while FOSECOIND.NS trades at ₹5,188.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas FOSECOIND.NS's P/E ratio is 47.85. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FOSECOIND.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is less volatile compared to FOSECOIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check FOSECOIND.NS's competition here
ACI.NS vs FOSECOIND.BO Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, FOSECOIND.BO has a market cap of 33.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while FOSECOIND.BO trades at ₹5,190.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas FOSECOIND.BO's P/E ratio is 42.52. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FOSECOIND.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is less volatile compared to FOSECOIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check FOSECOIND.BO's competition here
ACI.NS vs DDEVPLASTIK.BO Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, DDEVPLASTIK.BO has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while DDEVPLASTIK.BO trades at ₹262.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas DDEVPLASTIK.BO's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DDEVPLASTIK.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is less volatile compared to DDEVPLASTIK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check DDEVPLASTIK.BO's competition here
ACI.NS vs BEPL.BO Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, BEPL.BO has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while BEPL.BO trades at ₹93.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas BEPL.BO's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BEPL.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is less volatile compared to BEPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check BEPL.BO's competition here
ACI.NS vs BEPL.NS Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, BEPL.NS has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while BEPL.NS trades at ₹93.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas BEPL.NS's P/E ratio is 13.16. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BEPL.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is less volatile compared to BEPL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check BEPL.NS's competition here
ACI.NS vs SANSTAR.NS Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, SANSTAR.NS has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while SANSTAR.NS trades at ₹118.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas SANSTAR.NS's P/E ratio is 107.64. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SANSTAR.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is less volatile compared to SANSTAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check SANSTAR.NS's competition here
ACI.NS vs GODAVARIB.NS Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, GODAVARIB.NS has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while GODAVARIB.NS trades at ₹325.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas GODAVARIB.NS's P/E ratio is 47.57. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GODAVARIB.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is less volatile compared to GODAVARIB.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check GODAVARIB.NS's competition here
ACI.NS vs INEOSSTYRO.NS Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, INEOSSTYRO.NS has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while INEOSSTYRO.NS trades at ₹807.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas INEOSSTYRO.NS's P/E ratio is 11.53. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to INEOSSTYRO.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is more volatile compared to INEOSSTYRO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check INEOSSTYRO.NS's competition here
ACI.NS vs DCW.BO Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, DCW.BO has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while DCW.BO trades at ₹46.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas DCW.BO's P/E ratio is 27.64. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DCW.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is less volatile compared to DCW.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check DCW.BO's competition here
ACI.NS vs DCW.NS Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, DCW.NS has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while DCW.NS trades at ₹46.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas DCW.NS's P/E ratio is 28.63. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DCW.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is more volatile compared to DCW.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check DCW.NS's competition here
ACI.NS vs PUNJABCHEM.BO Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, PUNJABCHEM.BO has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while PUNJABCHEM.BO trades at ₹1,016.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas PUNJABCHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 19.54. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PUNJABCHEM.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is more volatile compared to PUNJABCHEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check PUNJABCHEM.BO's competition here
ACI.NS vs PUNJABCHEM.NS Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, PUNJABCHEM.NS has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while PUNJABCHEM.NS trades at ₹1,021.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas PUNJABCHEM.NS's P/E ratio is 19.51. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PUNJABCHEM.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is more volatile compared to PUNJABCHEM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check PUNJABCHEM.NS's competition here
ACI.NS vs GULPOLY.NS Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, GULPOLY.NS has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while GULPOLY.NS trades at ₹203.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas GULPOLY.NS's P/E ratio is 16.12. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GULPOLY.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is less volatile compared to GULPOLY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check GULPOLY.NS's competition here
ACI.NS vs ANDHRSUGAR.NS Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, ANDHRSUGAR.NS has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while ANDHRSUGAR.NS trades at ₹89.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas ANDHRSUGAR.NS's P/E ratio is 14.73. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ANDHRSUGAR.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is less volatile compared to ANDHRSUGAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check ANDHRSUGAR.NS's competition here
ACI.NS vs ANDHRSUGAR.BO Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, ANDHRSUGAR.BO has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while ANDHRSUGAR.BO trades at ₹89.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas ANDHRSUGAR.BO's P/E ratio is 14.72. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ANDHRSUGAR.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is less volatile compared to ANDHRSUGAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check ANDHRSUGAR.BO's competition here
ACI.NS vs GULPOLY.BO Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, GULPOLY.BO has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while GULPOLY.BO trades at ₹203.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas GULPOLY.BO's P/E ratio is 16.08. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GULPOLY.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is less volatile compared to GULPOLY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check GULPOLY.BO's competition here
ACI.NS vs AMNPLST.NS Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, AMNPLST.NS has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while AMNPLST.NS trades at ₹196.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas AMNPLST.NS's P/E ratio is 31.57. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AMNPLST.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is less volatile compared to AMNPLST.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check AMNPLST.NS's competition here
ACI.NS vs AMNPLST.BO Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, AMNPLST.BO has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while AMNPLST.BO trades at ₹197.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas AMNPLST.BO's P/E ratio is 31.29. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AMNPLST.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is less volatile compared to AMNPLST.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check AMNPLST.BO's competition here
ACI.NS vs INDOAMIN.NS Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, INDOAMIN.NS has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while INDOAMIN.NS trades at ₹125.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas INDOAMIN.NS's P/E ratio is 12.89. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to INDOAMIN.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is less volatile compared to INDOAMIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check INDOAMIN.NS's competition here
ACI.NS vs INDOAMIN.BO Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, INDOAMIN.BO has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while INDOAMIN.BO trades at ₹126.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas INDOAMIN.BO's P/E ratio is 12.87. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to INDOAMIN.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is less volatile compared to INDOAMIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check INDOAMIN.BO's competition here
ACI.NS vs INDOBORAX.NS Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, INDOBORAX.NS has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while INDOBORAX.NS trades at ₹324.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas INDOBORAX.NS's P/E ratio is 19.16. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to INDOBORAX.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is less volatile compared to INDOBORAX.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check INDOBORAX.NS's competition here
ACI.NS vs SRHHYPOLTD.BO Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, SRHHYPOLTD.BO has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while SRHHYPOLTD.BO trades at ₹532.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas SRHHYPOLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 9.43. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SRHHYPOLTD.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is less volatile compared to SRHHYPOLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check SRHHYPOLTD.BO's competition here
ACI.NS vs SRHHYPOLTD.NS Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, SRHHYPOLTD.NS has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while SRHHYPOLTD.NS trades at ₹528.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas SRHHYPOLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 9.40. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SRHHYPOLTD.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is less volatile compared to SRHHYPOLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check SRHHYPOLTD.NS's competition here
ACI.NS vs INDOBORAX.BO Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, INDOBORAX.BO has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while INDOBORAX.BO trades at ₹324.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas INDOBORAX.BO's P/E ratio is 19.07. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to INDOBORAX.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is less volatile compared to INDOBORAX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check INDOBORAX.BO's competition here
ACI.NS vs GEMAROMA.NS Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, GEMAROMA.NS has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while GEMAROMA.NS trades at ₹159.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas GEMAROMA.NS's P/E ratio is 29.51. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GEMAROMA.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is less volatile compared to GEMAROMA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check GEMAROMA.NS's competition here
ACI.NS vs VALIANTORG.BO Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, VALIANTORG.BO has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while VALIANTORG.BO trades at ₹292.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas VALIANTORG.BO's P/E ratio is 33.89. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VALIANTORG.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is less volatile compared to VALIANTORG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check VALIANTORG.BO's competition here
ACI.NS vs VALIANTORG.NS Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, VALIANTORG.NS has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while VALIANTORG.NS trades at ₹292.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas VALIANTORG.NS's P/E ratio is 33.91. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VALIANTORG.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is less volatile compared to VALIANTORG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check VALIANTORG.NS's competition here
ACI.NS vs ORIENTCQ.BO Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, ORIENTCQ.BO has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while ORIENTCQ.BO trades at ₹810.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas ORIENTCQ.BO's P/E ratio is 15.88. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ORIENTCQ.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is less volatile compared to ORIENTCQ.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check ORIENTCQ.BO's competition here
ACI.NS vs UNIENTER.NS Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, UNIENTER.NS has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while UNIENTER.NS trades at ₹106.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas UNIENTER.NS's P/E ratio is 38.09. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UNIENTER.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is less volatile compared to UNIENTER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check UNIENTER.NS's competition here
ACI.NS vs DMCC.BO Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, DMCC.BO has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while DMCC.BO trades at ₹275.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas DMCC.BO's P/E ratio is 27.03. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DMCC.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is less volatile compared to DMCC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check DMCC.BO's competition here
ACI.NS vs DMCC.NS Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, DMCC.NS has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while DMCC.NS trades at ₹274.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas DMCC.NS's P/E ratio is 27.02. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DMCC.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is less volatile compared to DMCC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check DMCC.NS's competition here
ACI.NS vs SUNSHIEL.BO Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, SUNSHIEL.BO has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while SUNSHIEL.BO trades at ₹866.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas SUNSHIEL.BO's P/E ratio is 26.31. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SUNSHIEL.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is less volatile compared to SUNSHIEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check SUNSHIEL.BO's competition here
ACI.NS vs NATPEROX.BO Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, NATPEROX.BO has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while NATPEROX.BO trades at ₹1,040.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas NATPEROX.BO's P/E ratio is 399.75. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NATPEROX.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is less volatile compared to NATPEROX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check NATPEROX.BO's competition here
ACI.NS vs PRIMO.NS Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, PRIMO.NS has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while PRIMO.NS trades at ₹22.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas PRIMO.NS's P/E ratio is 35.83. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PRIMO.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is less volatile compared to PRIMO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check PRIMO.NS's competition here
ACI.NS vs OCCLLTD.NS Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, OCCLLTD.NS has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while OCCLLTD.NS trades at ₹96.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas OCCLLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 12.73. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OCCLLTD.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is less volatile compared to OCCLLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check OCCLLTD.NS's competition here
ACI.NS vs A1L.BO Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, A1L.BO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while A1L.BO trades at ₹9.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas A1L.BO's P/E ratio is 115.25. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to A1L.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is less volatile compared to A1L.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check A1L.BO's competition here
ACI.NS vs KANORICHEM.BO Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, KANORICHEM.BO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while KANORICHEM.BO trades at ₹90.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas KANORICHEM.BO's P/E ratio is -5.37. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KANORICHEM.BO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is less volatile compared to KANORICHEM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check KANORICHEM.BO's competition here
ACI.NS vs KANORICHEM.NS Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, KANORICHEM.NS has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while KANORICHEM.NS trades at ₹90.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas KANORICHEM.NS's P/E ratio is -5.36. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KANORICHEM.NS's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is less volatile compared to KANORICHEM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check KANORICHEM.NS's competition here
ACI.NS vs LORDSCHLO.NS Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, LORDSCHLO.NS has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while LORDSCHLO.NS trades at ₹134.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas LORDSCHLO.NS's P/E ratio is 13.72. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LORDSCHLO.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is less volatile compared to LORDSCHLO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check LORDSCHLO.NS's competition here
ACI.NS vs LORDSCHLO.BO Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, LORDSCHLO.BO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while LORDSCHLO.BO trades at ₹134.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas LORDSCHLO.BO's P/E ratio is 13.70. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LORDSCHLO.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is less volatile compared to LORDSCHLO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check LORDSCHLO.BO's competition here
ACI.NS vs NAPEROL.BO Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, NAPEROL.BO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while NAPEROL.BO trades at ₹599.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas NAPEROL.BO's P/E ratio is 32.37. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NAPEROL.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is less volatile compared to NAPEROL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check NAPEROL.BO's competition here
ACI.NS vs DCMSRMIND.BO Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, DCMSRMIND.BO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while DCMSRMIND.BO trades at ₹175.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas DCMSRMIND.BO's P/E ratio is 3.63. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DCMSRMIND.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is less volatile compared to DCMSRMIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check DCMSRMIND.BO's competition here
ACI.NS vs INDGELA.BO Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, INDGELA.BO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while INDGELA.BO trades at ₹402.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas INDGELA.BO's P/E ratio is 10.91. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to INDGELA.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is less volatile compared to INDGELA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check INDGELA.BO's competition here
ACI.NS vs DIAMINESQ.NS Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, DIAMINESQ.NS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while DIAMINESQ.NS trades at ₹245.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas DIAMINESQ.NS's P/E ratio is -27.31. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DIAMINESQ.NS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is less volatile compared to DIAMINESQ.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check DIAMINESQ.NS's competition here
ACI.NS vs DIAMINESQ.BO Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, DIAMINESQ.BO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while DIAMINESQ.BO trades at ₹247.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas DIAMINESQ.BO's P/E ratio is -27.00. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DIAMINESQ.BO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is less volatile compared to DIAMINESQ.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check DIAMINESQ.BO's competition here
ACI.NS vs OCCL.NS Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, OCCL.NS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while OCCL.NS trades at ₹233.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas OCCL.NS's P/E ratio is 77.52. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OCCL.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is more volatile compared to OCCL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check OCCL.NS's competition here
ACI.NS vs ISHANCH.NS Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, ISHANCH.NS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while ISHANCH.NS trades at ₹61.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas ISHANCH.NS's P/E ratio is -14.48. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ISHANCH.NS's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is less volatile compared to ISHANCH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check ISHANCH.NS's competition here
ACI.NS vs JAYSYNTH.BO Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, JAYSYNTH.BO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while JAYSYNTH.BO trades at ₹11.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas JAYSYNTH.BO's P/E ratio is 13.23. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JAYSYNTH.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is less volatile compared to JAYSYNTH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check JAYSYNTH.BO's competition here
ACI.NS vs PAUSHAKLTD.BO Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, PAUSHAKLTD.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while PAUSHAKLTD.BO trades at ₹454.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas PAUSHAKLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 28.32. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PAUSHAKLTD.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is less volatile compared to PAUSHAKLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check PAUSHAKLTD.BO's competition here
ACI.NS vs CHEMCRUX.BO Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, CHEMCRUX.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while CHEMCRUX.BO trades at ₹91.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas CHEMCRUX.BO's P/E ratio is 63.94. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CHEMCRUX.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is less volatile compared to CHEMCRUX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check CHEMCRUX.BO's competition here
ACI.NS vs RESGEN.BO Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, RESGEN.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while RESGEN.BO trades at ₹61.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas RESGEN.BO's P/E ratio is 15.94. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RESGEN.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is less volatile compared to RESGEN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check RESGEN.BO's competition here
ACI.NS vs DEEPAKCHEM.BO Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, DEEPAKCHEM.BO has a market cap of 966.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while DEEPAKCHEM.BO trades at ₹88.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas DEEPAKCHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 8.63. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DEEPAKCHEM.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is more volatile compared to DEEPAKCHEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check DEEPAKCHEM.BO's competition here
ACI.NS vs PARAGON.NS Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, PARAGON.NS has a market cap of 925.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while PARAGON.NS trades at ₹47.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas PARAGON.NS's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PARAGON.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is more volatile compared to PARAGON.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check PARAGON.NS's competition here
ACI.NS vs POLYCHEM.BO Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, POLYCHEM.BO has a market cap of 838.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while POLYCHEM.BO trades at ₹2,105.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas POLYCHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 4.49. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to POLYCHEM.BO's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is less volatile compared to POLYCHEM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check POLYCHEM.BO's competition here
ACI.NS vs IEML.NS Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, IEML.NS has a market cap of 732.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while IEML.NS trades at ₹52.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas IEML.NS's P/E ratio is 4.41. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IEML.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is less volatile compared to IEML.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check IEML.NS's competition here
ACI.NS vs SANGINITA.NS Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, SANGINITA.NS has a market cap of 659.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while SANGINITA.NS trades at ₹25.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas SANGINITA.NS's P/E ratio is -19.43. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SANGINITA.NS's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is more volatile compared to SANGINITA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check SANGINITA.NS's competition here
ACI.NS vs ASHOKALC.BO Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, ASHOKALC.BO has a market cap of 551.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while ASHOKALC.BO trades at ₹119.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas ASHOKALC.BO's P/E ratio is -10.04. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ASHOKALC.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is less volatile compared to ASHOKALC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check ASHOKALC.BO's competition here
ACI.NS vs ZR2.BO Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, ZR2.BO has a market cap of 513.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while ZR2.BO trades at ₹148.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas ZR2.BO's P/E ratio is 553.85. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ZR2.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is more volatile compared to ZR2.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check ZR2.BO's competition here
ACI.NS vs GARODCH.BO Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, GARODCH.BO has a market cap of 482.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while GARODCH.BO trades at ₹138.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas GARODCH.BO's P/E ratio is 76.21. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GARODCH.BO's ROE of -1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is more volatile compared to GARODCH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check GARODCH.BO's competition here
ACI.NS vs SHIVAAGRO.BO Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, SHIVAAGRO.BO has a market cap of 404.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while SHIVAAGRO.BO trades at ₹41.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas SHIVAAGRO.BO's P/E ratio is 184.14. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SHIVAAGRO.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is less volatile compared to SHIVAAGRO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check SHIVAAGRO.BO's competition here
ACI.NS vs TRELCHE-B.BO Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, TRELCHE-B.BO has a market cap of 392.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while TRELCHE-B.BO trades at ₹20.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas TRELCHE-B.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TRELCHE-B.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is more volatile compared to TRELCHE-B.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check TRELCHE-B.BO's competition here
ACI.NS vs HARLETH.BO Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, HARLETH.BO has a market cap of 332.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while HARLETH.BO trades at ₹68.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas HARLETH.BO's P/E ratio is 13.35. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HARLETH.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is less volatile compared to HARLETH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check HARLETH.BO's competition here
ACI.NS vs VINEETLAB.BO Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, VINEETLAB.BO has a market cap of 323.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while VINEETLAB.BO trades at ₹35.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas VINEETLAB.BO's P/E ratio is -4.67. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VINEETLAB.BO's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is less volatile compared to VINEETLAB.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check VINEETLAB.BO's competition here
ACI.NS vs VINEETLAB.NS Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, VINEETLAB.NS has a market cap of 320.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while VINEETLAB.NS trades at ₹36.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas VINEETLAB.NS's P/E ratio is -4.63. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VINEETLAB.NS's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is less volatile compared to VINEETLAB.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check VINEETLAB.NS's competition here
ACI.NS vs CAPRO.BO Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, CAPRO.BO has a market cap of 207.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while CAPRO.BO trades at ₹45.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas CAPRO.BO's P/E ratio is 43.73. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CAPRO.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is more volatile compared to CAPRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check CAPRO.BO's competition here
ACI.NS vs GUJRAFFIA.NS Comparison May 2026
ACI.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACI.NS stands at 64.4B. In comparison, GUJRAFFIA.NS has a market cap of 201.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ACI.NS is priced at ₹521.85, while GUJRAFFIA.NS trades at ₹37.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.29, whereas GUJRAFFIA.NS's P/E ratio is 18.01. In terms of profitability, ACI.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GUJRAFFIA.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ACI.NS is less volatile compared to GUJRAFFIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACI.NS.Check GUJRAFFIA.NS's competition here