ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. ZIM Peers
See (ZIM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Marine Shipping Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZIM | $16.09 | -2.66% | 1.9B | 0.88 | $18.21 | +52.78% |
| KEX | $113.41 | -1.37% | 6.4B | 22.45 | $5.05 | N/A |
| MATX | $111.35 | -0.56% | 3.6B | 7.39 | $15.07 | +1.23% |
| SB-PC | $25.70 | +0.00% | 2.6B | 17.04 | $1.51 | +5.51% |
| SB-PD | $25.50 | +0.64% | 2.6B | 16.91 | $1.51 | +5.51% |
| HAFN | $4.99 | -1.77% | 2.5B | 4.16 | $1.20 | +18.35% |
| SBLK | $17.25 | +0.76% | 2B | 9.03 | $1.91 | +8.37% |
| BWLP | $11.83 | -1.50% | 1.8B | 6.33 | $1.87 | +14.29% |
| CMBT | $9.02 | -2.06% | 1.7B | 4.08 | $2.21 | +12.64% |
| CDLR | $19.87 | -2.17% | 1.7B | 16.56 | $1.20 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ZIM vs KEX Comparison
ZIM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM stands at 1.9B. In comparison, KEX has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM is priced at $16.09, while KEX trades at $113.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.88, whereas KEX's P/E ratio is 22.45. In terms of profitability, ZIM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to KEX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM is more volatile compared to KEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.
ZIM vs MATX Comparison
ZIM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MATX has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM is priced at $16.09, while MATX trades at $111.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.88, whereas MATX's P/E ratio is 7.39. In terms of profitability, ZIM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to MATX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM is more volatile compared to MATX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.
ZIM vs SB-PC Comparison
ZIM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SB-PC has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM is priced at $16.09, while SB-PC trades at $25.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.88, whereas SB-PC's P/E ratio is 17.04. In terms of profitability, ZIM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to SB-PC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM is more volatile compared to SB-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.
ZIM vs SB-PD Comparison
ZIM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SB-PD has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM is priced at $16.09, while SB-PD trades at $25.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.88, whereas SB-PD's P/E ratio is 16.91. In terms of profitability, ZIM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to SB-PD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM is more volatile compared to SB-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.
ZIM vs HAFN Comparison
ZIM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM stands at 1.9B. In comparison, HAFN has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM is priced at $16.09, while HAFN trades at $4.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.88, whereas HAFN's P/E ratio is 4.16. In terms of profitability, ZIM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to HAFN's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM is more volatile compared to HAFN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.
ZIM vs SBLK Comparison
ZIM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SBLK has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM is priced at $16.09, while SBLK trades at $17.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.88, whereas SBLK's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, ZIM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to SBLK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM is more volatile compared to SBLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.
ZIM vs BWLP Comparison
ZIM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BWLP has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM is priced at $16.09, while BWLP trades at $11.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.88, whereas BWLP's P/E ratio is 6.33. In terms of profitability, ZIM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to BWLP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM is more volatile compared to BWLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.
ZIM vs CMBT Comparison
ZIM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CMBT has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM is priced at $16.09, while CMBT trades at $9.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.88, whereas CMBT's P/E ratio is 4.08. In terms of profitability, ZIM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to CMBT's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM is more volatile compared to CMBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.
ZIM vs CDLR Comparison
ZIM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CDLR has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM is priced at $16.09, while CDLR trades at $19.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.88, whereas CDLR's P/E ratio is 16.56. In terms of profitability, ZIM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to CDLR's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM is more volatile compared to CDLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.
ZIM vs DAC Comparison
ZIM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM stands at 1.9B. In comparison, DAC has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM is priced at $16.09, while DAC trades at $86.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.88, whereas DAC's P/E ratio is 3.52. In terms of profitability, ZIM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to DAC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM is more volatile compared to DAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.
ZIM vs GOGL Comparison
ZIM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GOGL has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM is priced at $16.09, while GOGL trades at $7.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.88, whereas GOGL's P/E ratio is 12.84. In terms of profitability, ZIM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to GOGL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM is more volatile compared to GOGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.
ZIM vs CCEC Comparison
ZIM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CCEC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM is priced at $16.09, while CCEC trades at $23.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.88, whereas CCEC's P/E ratio is 39.63. In terms of profitability, ZIM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to CCEC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM is more volatile compared to CCEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.
ZIM vs SBBA Comparison
ZIM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SBBA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM is priced at $16.09, while SBBA trades at $25.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.88, whereas SBBA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZIM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to SBBA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM is more volatile compared to SBBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.
ZIM vs SFL Comparison
ZIM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SFL has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM is priced at $16.09, while SFL trades at $8.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.88, whereas SFL's P/E ratio is 20.33. In terms of profitability, ZIM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to SFL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM is more volatile compared to SFL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.
ZIM vs CMRE-PC Comparison
ZIM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CMRE-PC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM is priced at $16.09, while CMRE-PC trades at $26.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.88, whereas CMRE-PC's P/E ratio is 7.10. In terms of profitability, ZIM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to CMRE-PC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM is more volatile compared to CMRE-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.
ZIM vs CMRE-PD Comparison
ZIM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CMRE-PD has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM is priced at $16.09, while CMRE-PD trades at $26.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.88, whereas CMRE-PD's P/E ratio is 7.13. In terms of profitability, ZIM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to CMRE-PD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM is more volatile compared to CMRE-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.
ZIM vs CMRE-PB Comparison
ZIM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CMRE-PB has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM is priced at $16.09, while CMRE-PB trades at $25.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.88, whereas CMRE-PB's P/E ratio is 6.73. In terms of profitability, ZIM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to CMRE-PB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM is more volatile compared to CMRE-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.
ZIM vs NMM Comparison
ZIM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NMM has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM is priced at $16.09, while NMM trades at $37.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.88, whereas NMM's P/E ratio is 3.42. In terms of profitability, ZIM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to NMM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM is less volatile compared to NMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.
ZIM vs CMRE Comparison
ZIM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CMRE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM is priced at $16.09, while CMRE trades at $9.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.88, whereas CMRE's P/E ratio is 3.74. In terms of profitability, ZIM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to CMRE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM is more volatile compared to CMRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.
ZIM vs CMRE-PE Comparison
ZIM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CMRE-PE has a market cap of 983.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM is priced at $16.09, while CMRE-PE trades at $42.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.88, whereas CMRE-PE's P/E ratio is 11.47. In terms of profitability, ZIM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to CMRE-PE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM is more volatile compared to CMRE-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.
ZIM vs CPLP Comparison
ZIM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CPLP has a market cap of 979.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM is priced at $16.09, while CPLP trades at $16.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.88, whereas CPLP's P/E ratio is 6.63. In terms of profitability, ZIM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to CPLP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM is less volatile compared to CPLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.
ZIM vs GSL Comparison
ZIM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GSL has a market cap of 936.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM is priced at $16.09, while GSL trades at $26.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.88, whereas GSL's P/E ratio is 2.56. In terms of profitability, ZIM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to GSL's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM is more volatile compared to GSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.
ZIM vs GSL-PB Comparison
ZIM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GSL-PB has a market cap of 915.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM is priced at $16.09, while GSL-PB trades at $25.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.88, whereas GSL-PB's P/E ratio is 4.11. In terms of profitability, ZIM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to GSL-PB's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM is more volatile compared to GSL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.
ZIM vs ECO Comparison
ZIM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ECO has a market cap of 698.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM is priced at $16.09, while ECO trades at $21.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.88, whereas ECO's P/E ratio is 8.75. In terms of profitability, ZIM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to ECO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM is more volatile compared to ECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.
ZIM vs GNK Comparison
ZIM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GNK has a market cap of 561.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM is priced at $16.09, while GNK trades at $13.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.88, whereas GNK's P/E ratio is 12.57. In terms of profitability, ZIM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to GNK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM is more volatile compared to GNK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.
ZIM vs NAT Comparison
ZIM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NAT has a market cap of 558M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM is priced at $16.09, while NAT trades at $2.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.88, whereas NAT's P/E ratio is 15.50. In terms of profitability, ZIM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to NAT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM is less volatile compared to NAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.
ZIM vs GRIN Comparison
ZIM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GRIN has a market cap of 507.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM is priced at $16.09, while GRIN trades at $25.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.88, whereas GRIN's P/E ratio is -52.63. In terms of profitability, ZIM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to GRIN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM is more volatile compared to GRIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.
ZIM vs NETI Comparison
ZIM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NETI has a market cap of 437.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM is priced at $16.09, while NETI trades at $11.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.88, whereas NETI's P/E ratio is -11.44. In terms of profitability, ZIM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to NETI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM is more volatile compared to NETI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.
ZIM vs ASC Comparison
ZIM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ASC has a market cap of 390.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM is priced at $16.09, while ASC trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.88, whereas ASC's P/E ratio is 2.99. In terms of profitability, ZIM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to ASC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM is more volatile compared to ASC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.
ZIM vs SB Comparison
ZIM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SB has a market cap of 369.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM is priced at $16.09, while SB trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.88, whereas SB's P/E ratio is 5.39. In terms of profitability, ZIM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to SB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM is less volatile compared to SB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.
ZIM vs CLCO Comparison
ZIM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CLCO has a market cap of 360.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM is priced at $16.09, while CLCO trades at $6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.88, whereas CLCO's P/E ratio is 5.09. In terms of profitability, ZIM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to CLCO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM is less volatile compared to CLCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.
ZIM vs ESEA Comparison
ZIM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ESEA has a market cap of 313.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM is priced at $16.09, while ESEA trades at $44.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.88, whereas ESEA's P/E ratio is 2.82. In terms of profitability, ZIM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to ESEA's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM is less volatile compared to ESEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.
ZIM vs PANL Comparison
ZIM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PANL has a market cap of 308.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM is priced at $16.09, while PANL trades at $4.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.88, whereas PANL's P/E ratio is 13.43. In terms of profitability, ZIM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to PANL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM is less volatile compared to PANL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.
ZIM vs HSHP Comparison
ZIM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM stands at 1.9B. In comparison, HSHP has a market cap of 268.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM is priced at $16.09, while HSHP trades at $5.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.88, whereas HSHP's P/E ratio is 20.63. In terms of profitability, ZIM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to HSHP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM is more volatile compared to HSHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.
ZIM vs GASS Comparison
ZIM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GASS has a market cap of 237M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM is priced at $16.09, while GASS trades at $6.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.88, whereas GASS's P/E ratio is 3.58. In terms of profitability, ZIM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to GASS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM is less volatile compared to GASS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.
ZIM vs KNOP Comparison
ZIM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM stands at 1.9B. In comparison, KNOP has a market cap of 214.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM is priced at $16.09, while KNOP trades at $6.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.88, whereas KNOP's P/E ratio is 30.05. In terms of profitability, ZIM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to KNOP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM is less volatile compared to KNOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.
ZIM vs CMDB Comparison
ZIM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CMDB has a market cap of 210.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM is priced at $16.09, while CMDB trades at $8.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.88, whereas CMDB's P/E ratio is -2.14. In terms of profitability, ZIM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to CMDB's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM is less volatile compared to CMDB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.
ZIM vs ESEAV Comparison
ZIM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ESEAV has a market cap of 194.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM is priced at $16.09, while ESEAV trades at $27.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.88, whereas ESEAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZIM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to ESEAV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM is more volatile compared to ESEAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.
ZIM vs DSX-PB Comparison
ZIM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM stands at 1.9B. In comparison, DSX-PB has a market cap of 179.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM is priced at $16.09, while DSX-PB trades at $26.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.88, whereas DSX-PB's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, ZIM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to DSX-PB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM is more volatile compared to DSX-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.
ZIM vs DSX Comparison
ZIM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM stands at 1.9B. In comparison, DSX has a market cap of 169M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM is priced at $16.09, while DSX trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.88, whereas DSX's P/E ratio is 29.20. In terms of profitability, ZIM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to DSX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM is less volatile compared to DSX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.
ZIM vs SMHI Comparison
ZIM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SMHI has a market cap of 137.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM is priced at $16.09, while SMHI trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.88, whereas SMHI's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, ZIM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to SMHI's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM is less volatile compared to SMHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.
ZIM vs SHIP Comparison
ZIM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SHIP has a market cap of 131.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM is priced at $16.09, while SHIP trades at $6.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.88, whereas SHIP's P/E ratio is 4.97. In terms of profitability, ZIM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to SHIP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM is less volatile compared to SHIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.
ZIM vs HMR Comparison
ZIM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM stands at 1.9B. In comparison, HMR has a market cap of 99.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM is priced at $16.09, while HMR trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.88, whereas HMR's P/E ratio is -17.10. In terms of profitability, ZIM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to HMR's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM is less volatile compared to HMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.
ZIM vs NCT Comparison
ZIM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NCT has a market cap of 89.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM is priced at $16.09, while NCT trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.88, whereas NCT's P/E ratio is 33.00. In terms of profitability, ZIM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to NCT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM is less volatile compared to NCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.
ZIM vs UFG Comparison
ZIM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM stands at 1.9B. In comparison, UFG has a market cap of 72.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM is priced at $16.09, while UFG trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.88, whereas UFG's P/E ratio is 225.00. In terms of profitability, ZIM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to UFG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM is less volatile compared to UFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.
ZIM vs NM Comparison
ZIM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NM has a market cap of 51.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM is priced at $16.09, while NM trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.88, whereas NM's P/E ratio is -3.39. In terms of profitability, ZIM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to NM's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM is more volatile compared to NM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.
ZIM vs PXSAP Comparison
ZIM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PXSAP has a market cap of 46.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM is priced at $16.09, while PXSAP trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.88, whereas PXSAP's P/E ratio is -16.95. In terms of profitability, ZIM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to PXSAP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM is more volatile compared to PXSAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.
ZIM vs EHLDV Comparison
ZIM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM stands at 1.9B. In comparison, EHLDV has a market cap of 44.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM is priced at $16.09, while EHLDV trades at $15.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.88, whereas EHLDV's P/E ratio is 224.29. In terms of profitability, ZIM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to EHLDV's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM is less volatile compared to EHLDV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.
ZIM vs TORO Comparison
ZIM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TORO has a market cap of 41.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM is priced at $16.09, while TORO trades at $2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.88, whereas TORO's P/E ratio is -54.50. In terms of profitability, ZIM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to TORO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM is less volatile compared to TORO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.
ZIM vs NM-PG Comparison
ZIM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NM-PG has a market cap of 31.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM is priced at $16.09, while NM-PG trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.88, whereas NM-PG's P/E ratio is 0.89. In terms of profitability, ZIM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to NM-PG's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM is less volatile compared to NM-PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.
ZIM vs PXS Comparison
ZIM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PXS has a market cap of 29.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM is priced at $16.09, while PXS trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.88, whereas PXS's P/E ratio is 4.31. In terms of profitability, ZIM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to PXS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM is less volatile compared to PXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.
ZIM vs EDRY Comparison
ZIM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM stands at 1.9B. In comparison, EDRY has a market cap of 27.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM is priced at $16.09, while EDRY trades at $9.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.88, whereas EDRY's P/E ratio is -1.84. In terms of profitability, ZIM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to EDRY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM is less volatile compared to EDRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.
ZIM vs CACO Comparison
ZIM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CACO has a market cap of 24.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM is priced at $16.09, while CACO trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.88, whereas CACO's P/E ratio is -2.44. In terms of profitability, ZIM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to CACO's ROE of +21.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM is less volatile compared to CACO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.
ZIM vs TOPS Comparison
ZIM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TOPS has a market cap of 24.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM is priced at $16.09, while TOPS trades at $5.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.88, whereas TOPS's P/E ratio is 4.82. In terms of profitability, ZIM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to TOPS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM is less volatile compared to TOPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.
ZIM vs GLBS Comparison
ZIM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GLBS has a market cap of 23.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM is priced at $16.09, while GLBS trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.88, whereas GLBS's P/E ratio is -29.00. In terms of profitability, ZIM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to GLBS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM is less volatile compared to GLBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.
ZIM vs HTCO Comparison
ZIM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM stands at 1.9B. In comparison, HTCO has a market cap of 22.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM is priced at $16.09, while HTCO trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.88, whereas HTCO's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, ZIM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to HTCO's ROE of +1067.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM is less volatile compared to HTCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.
ZIM vs NM-PH Comparison
ZIM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NM-PH has a market cap of 22.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM is priced at $16.09, while NM-PH trades at $3.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.88, whereas NM-PH's P/E ratio is 0.58. In terms of profitability, ZIM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to NM-PH's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM is more volatile compared to NM-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.
ZIM vs EHLD Comparison
ZIM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM stands at 1.9B. In comparison, EHLD has a market cap of 21.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM is priced at $16.09, while EHLD trades at $7.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.88, whereas EHLD's P/E ratio is 5.77. In terms of profitability, ZIM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to EHLD's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM is less volatile compared to EHLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.
ZIM vs PSHG Comparison
ZIM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PSHG has a market cap of 21.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM is priced at $16.09, while PSHG trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.88, whereas PSHG's P/E ratio is 1.11. In terms of profitability, ZIM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to PSHG's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM is less volatile compared to PSHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.
ZIM vs CTRM Comparison
ZIM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CTRM has a market cap of 20.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM is priced at $16.09, while CTRM trades at $2.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.88, whereas CTRM's P/E ratio is 5.61. In terms of profitability, ZIM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to CTRM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM is less volatile compared to CTRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.
ZIM vs OP Comparison
ZIM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM stands at 1.9B. In comparison, OP has a market cap of 13.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM is priced at $16.09, while OP trades at $1.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.88, whereas OP's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, ZIM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to OP's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM is less volatile compared to OP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.
ZIM vs USEA Comparison
ZIM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM stands at 1.9B. In comparison, USEA has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM is priced at $16.09, while USEA trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.88, whereas USEA's P/E ratio is -1.93. In terms of profitability, ZIM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to USEA's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM is less volatile compared to USEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.
ZIM vs ICON Comparison
ZIM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ICON has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM is priced at $16.09, while ICON trades at $2.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.88, whereas ICON's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, ZIM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to ICON's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM is less volatile compared to ICON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.
ZIM vs EGLE Comparison
ZIM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM stands at 1.9B. In comparison, EGLE has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM is priced at $16.09, while EGLE trades at $27.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.88, whereas EGLE's P/E ratio is 24.32. In terms of profitability, ZIM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to EGLE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM is more volatile compared to EGLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.
ZIM vs CISS Comparison
ZIM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CISS has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM is priced at $16.09, while CISS trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.88, whereas CISS's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, ZIM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to CISS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM is less volatile compared to CISS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.
ZIM vs PXSAW Comparison
ZIM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PXSAW has a market cap of 240.1K. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM is priced at $16.09, while PXSAW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.88, whereas PXSAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZIM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to PXSAW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM is more volatile compared to PXSAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.
ZIM vs SHIPW Comparison
ZIM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SHIPW has a market cap of 75.6K. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM is priced at $16.09, while SHIPW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.88, whereas SHIPW's P/E ratio is 0.21. In terms of profitability, ZIM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to SHIPW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM is less volatile compared to SHIPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.
ZIM vs SBLKZ Comparison
ZIM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SBLKZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM is priced at $16.09, while SBLKZ trades at $25.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.88, whereas SBLKZ's P/E ratio is 104.92. In terms of profitability, ZIM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to SBLKZ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM is more volatile compared to SBLKZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.
ZIM vs TOROV Comparison
ZIM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TOROV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM is priced at $16.09, while TOROV trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.88, whereas TOROV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZIM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to TOROV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM is less volatile compared to TOROV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.
ZIM vs SHIPZ Comparison
ZIM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZIM stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SHIPZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ZIM is priced at $16.09, while SHIPZ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZIM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.88, whereas SHIPZ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ZIM's ROE is +0.64%, compared to SHIPZ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ZIM is less volatile compared to SHIPZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZIM.