Icon Energy Corp. (ICON) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ICON) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Marine Shipping Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICON | $1.13 | +0.00% | 449.5K | -0.06 | -$18.04 | N/A |
| KEX | $141.05 | -1.18% | 7.5B | 21.74 | $6.49 | N/A |
| MATX | $187.32 | +0.02% | 5.7B | 13.91 | $13.49 | +0.76% |
| HAFN | $7.28 | +0.28% | 3.6B | 8.09 | $0.90 | +10.09% |
| CMBT | $14.78 | +2.35% | 3.4B | 8.49 | $1.74 | +6.12% |
| BWLP | $20.50 | +0.84% | 3.1B | 8.60 | $2.38 | +7.18% |
| SBLK | $27.32 | +0.63% | 3B | 21.86 | $1.25 | +2.14% |
| ZIM | $25.24 | -0.83% | 3B | 30.77 | $0.82 | +7.94% |
| CMRE-PC | $26.82 | -0.11% | 3B | 7.22 | $3.72 | +2.89% |
| SB-PC | $26.15 | +0.00% | 2.7B | 17.34 | $1.51 | +3.07% |
Stock Comparison
ICON vs KEX Comparison June 2026
ICON plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON stands at 449.5K. In comparison, KEX has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ICON is priced at $1.13, while KEX trades at $141.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas KEX's P/E ratio is 21.74. In terms of profitability, ICON's ROE is -0.20%, compared to KEX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON is more volatile compared to KEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.Check KEX's competition here
ICON vs MATX Comparison June 2026
ICON plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON stands at 449.5K. In comparison, MATX has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ICON is priced at $1.13, while MATX trades at $187.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas MATX's P/E ratio is 13.91. In terms of profitability, ICON's ROE is -0.20%, compared to MATX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON is more volatile compared to MATX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.Check MATX's competition here
ICON vs HAFN Comparison June 2026
ICON plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON stands at 449.5K. In comparison, HAFN has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ICON is priced at $1.13, while HAFN trades at $7.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas HAFN's P/E ratio is 8.09. In terms of profitability, ICON's ROE is -0.20%, compared to HAFN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON is more volatile compared to HAFN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.Check HAFN's competition here
ICON vs CMBT Comparison June 2026
ICON plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON stands at 449.5K. In comparison, CMBT has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ICON is priced at $1.13, while CMBT trades at $14.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas CMBT's P/E ratio is 8.49. In terms of profitability, ICON's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CMBT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON is more volatile compared to CMBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.Check CMBT's competition here
ICON vs BWLP Comparison June 2026
ICON plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON stands at 449.5K. In comparison, BWLP has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ICON is priced at $1.13, while BWLP trades at $20.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas BWLP's P/E ratio is 8.60. In terms of profitability, ICON's ROE is -0.20%, compared to BWLP's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON is more volatile compared to BWLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.Check BWLP's competition here
ICON vs SBLK Comparison June 2026
ICON plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON stands at 449.5K. In comparison, SBLK has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ICON is priced at $1.13, while SBLK trades at $27.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas SBLK's P/E ratio is 21.86. In terms of profitability, ICON's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SBLK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON is more volatile compared to SBLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.Check SBLK's competition here
ICON vs ZIM Comparison June 2026
ICON plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON stands at 449.5K. In comparison, ZIM has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ICON is priced at $1.13, while ZIM trades at $25.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas ZIM's P/E ratio is 30.77. In terms of profitability, ICON's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ZIM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON is more volatile compared to ZIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.Check ZIM's competition here
ICON vs CMRE-PC Comparison June 2026
ICON plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON stands at 449.5K. In comparison, CMRE-PC has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ICON is priced at $1.13, while CMRE-PC trades at $26.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas CMRE-PC's P/E ratio is 7.22. In terms of profitability, ICON's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CMRE-PC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON is more volatile compared to CMRE-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.Check CMRE-PC's competition here
ICON vs SB-PC Comparison June 2026
ICON plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON stands at 449.5K. In comparison, SB-PC has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ICON is priced at $1.13, while SB-PC trades at $26.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas SB-PC's P/E ratio is 17.34. In terms of profitability, ICON's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SB-PC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON is more volatile compared to SB-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.Check SB-PC's competition here
ICON vs SB-PD Comparison June 2026
ICON plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON stands at 449.5K. In comparison, SB-PD has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ICON is priced at $1.13, while SB-PD trades at $26.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas SB-PD's P/E ratio is 17.24. In terms of profitability, ICON's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SB-PD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON is more volatile compared to SB-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.Check SB-PD's competition here
ICON vs TNK Comparison June 2026
ICON plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON stands at 449.5K. In comparison, TNK has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ICON is priced at $1.13, while TNK trades at $72.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas TNK's P/E ratio is 5.87. In terms of profitability, ICON's ROE is -0.20%, compared to TNK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON is more volatile compared to TNK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.Check TNK's competition here
ICON vs DAC Comparison June 2026
ICON plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON stands at 449.5K. In comparison, DAC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ICON is priced at $1.13, while DAC trades at $129.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas DAC's P/E ratio is 4.55. In terms of profitability, ICON's ROE is -0.20%, compared to DAC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON is more volatile compared to DAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.Check DAC's competition here
ICON vs CDLR Comparison June 2026
ICON plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON stands at 449.5K. In comparison, CDLR has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ICON is priced at $1.13, while CDLR trades at $23.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas CDLR's P/E ratio is 6.75. In terms of profitability, ICON's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CDLR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON is more volatile compared to CDLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.Check CDLR's competition here
ICON vs NMM Comparison June 2026
ICON plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON stands at 449.5K. In comparison, NMM has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ICON is priced at $1.13, while NMM trades at $71.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas NMM's P/E ratio is 6.04. In terms of profitability, ICON's ROE is -0.20%, compared to NMM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON is more volatile compared to NMM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.Check NMM's competition here
ICON vs CMRE Comparison June 2026
ICON plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON stands at 449.5K. In comparison, CMRE has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ICON is priced at $1.13, while CMRE trades at $15.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas CMRE's P/E ratio is 5.65. In terms of profitability, ICON's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CMRE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON is more volatile compared to CMRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.Check CMRE's competition here
ICON vs GOGL Comparison June 2026
ICON plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON stands at 449.5K. In comparison, GOGL has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ICON is priced at $1.13, while GOGL trades at $7.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas GOGL's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, ICON's ROE is -0.20%, compared to GOGL's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON is more volatile compared to GOGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.Check GOGL's competition here
ICON vs ECO Comparison June 2026
ICON plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON stands at 449.5K. In comparison, ECO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ICON is priced at $1.13, while ECO trades at $47.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas ECO's P/E ratio is 8.39. In terms of profitability, ICON's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ECO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON is more volatile compared to ECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.Check ECO's competition here
ICON vs SFL Comparison June 2026
ICON plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON stands at 449.5K. In comparison, SFL has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ICON is priced at $1.13, while SFL trades at $10.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas SFL's P/E ratio is 45.67. In terms of profitability, ICON's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SFL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON is more volatile compared to SFL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.Check SFL's competition here
ICON vs CMRE-PD Comparison June 2026
ICON plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON stands at 449.5K. In comparison, CMRE-PD has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ICON is priced at $1.13, while CMRE-PD trades at $27.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas CMRE-PD's P/E ratio is 7.53. In terms of profitability, ICON's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CMRE-PD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON is more volatile compared to CMRE-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.Check CMRE-PD's competition here
ICON vs GSL Comparison June 2026
ICON plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON stands at 449.5K. In comparison, GSL has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ICON is priced at $1.13, while GSL trades at $38.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas GSL's P/E ratio is 3.65. In terms of profitability, ICON's ROE is -0.20%, compared to GSL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON is more volatile compared to GSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.Check GSL's competition here
ICON vs CMRE-PB Comparison June 2026
ICON plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON stands at 449.5K. In comparison, CMRE-PB has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ICON is priced at $1.13, while CMRE-PB trades at $26.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas CMRE-PB's P/E ratio is 7.01. In terms of profitability, ICON's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CMRE-PB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON is more volatile compared to CMRE-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.Check CMRE-PB's competition here
ICON vs CCEC Comparison June 2026
ICON plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON stands at 449.5K. In comparison, CCEC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ICON is priced at $1.13, while CCEC trades at $22.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas CCEC's P/E ratio is 13.30. In terms of profitability, ICON's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CCEC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON is more volatile compared to CCEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.Check CCEC's competition here
ICON vs SBBA Comparison June 2026
ICON plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON stands at 449.5K. In comparison, SBBA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ICON is priced at $1.13, while SBBA trades at $25.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas SBBA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICON's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SBBA's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON is more volatile compared to SBBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.Check SBBA's competition here
ICON vs NAT Comparison June 2026
ICON plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON stands at 449.5K. In comparison, NAT has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ICON is priced at $1.13, while NAT trades at $5.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas NAT's P/E ratio is 20.75. In terms of profitability, ICON's ROE is -0.20%, compared to NAT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON is more volatile compared to NAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.Check NAT's competition here
ICON vs GNK Comparison June 2026
ICON plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON stands at 449.5K. In comparison, GNK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ICON is priced at $1.13, while GNK trades at $24.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas GNK's P/E ratio is 63.31. In terms of profitability, ICON's ROE is -0.20%, compared to GNK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON is more volatile compared to GNK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.Check GNK's competition here
ICON vs CMRE-PE Comparison June 2026
ICON plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON stands at 449.5K. In comparison, CMRE-PE has a market cap of 983.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ICON is priced at $1.13, while CMRE-PE trades at $42.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas CMRE-PE's P/E ratio is 11.47. In terms of profitability, ICON's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CMRE-PE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON is more volatile compared to CMRE-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.Check CMRE-PE's competition here
ICON vs CPLP Comparison June 2026
ICON plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON stands at 449.5K. In comparison, CPLP has a market cap of 979.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ICON is priced at $1.13, while CPLP trades at $16.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas CPLP's P/E ratio is 6.63. In terms of profitability, ICON's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CPLP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON is more volatile compared to CPLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.Check CPLP's competition here
ICON vs GSL-PB Comparison June 2026
ICON plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON stands at 449.5K. In comparison, GSL-PB has a market cap of 965.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ICON is priced at $1.13, while GSL-PB trades at $26.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas GSL-PB's P/E ratio is 4.30. In terms of profitability, ICON's ROE is -0.20%, compared to GSL-PB's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON is more volatile compared to GSL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.Check GSL-PB's competition here
ICON vs HSHP Comparison June 2026
ICON plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON stands at 449.5K. In comparison, HSHP has a market cap of 689.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ICON is priced at $1.13, while HSHP trades at $14.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas HSHP's P/E ratio is 23.21. In terms of profitability, ICON's ROE is -0.20%, compared to HSHP's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON is more volatile compared to HSHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.Check HSHP's competition here
ICON vs ASC Comparison June 2026
ICON plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON stands at 449.5K. In comparison, ASC has a market cap of 671.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ICON is priced at $1.13, while ASC trades at $16.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas ASC's P/E ratio is 12.47. In terms of profitability, ICON's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ASC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON is more volatile compared to ASC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.Check ASC's competition here
ICON vs SB Comparison June 2026
ICON plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON stands at 449.5K. In comparison, SB has a market cap of 665.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ICON is priced at $1.13, while SB trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas SB's P/E ratio is 21.70. In terms of profitability, ICON's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON is more volatile compared to SB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.Check SB's competition here
ICON vs CLCO Comparison June 2026
ICON plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON stands at 449.5K. In comparison, CLCO has a market cap of 511.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ICON is priced at $1.13, while CLCO trades at $9.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas CLCO's P/E ratio is 9.21. In terms of profitability, ICON's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CLCO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON is more volatile compared to CLCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.Check CLCO's competition here
ICON vs PANL Comparison June 2026
ICON plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON stands at 449.5K. In comparison, PANL has a market cap of 471.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ICON is priced at $1.13, while PANL trades at $7.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas PANL's P/E ratio is 13.35. In terms of profitability, ICON's ROE is -0.20%, compared to PANL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON is more volatile compared to PANL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.Check PANL's competition here
ICON vs ESEA Comparison June 2026
ICON plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON stands at 449.5K. In comparison, ESEA has a market cap of 468.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ICON is priced at $1.13, while ESEA trades at $66.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas ESEA's P/E ratio is 3.48. In terms of profitability, ICON's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ESEA's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON is more volatile compared to ESEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.Check ESEA's competition here
ICON vs NETI Comparison June 2026
ICON plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON stands at 449.5K. In comparison, NETI has a market cap of 437.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ICON is priced at $1.13, while NETI trades at $11.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas NETI's P/E ratio is -11.44. In terms of profitability, ICON's ROE is -0.20%, compared to NETI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON is more volatile compared to NETI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.Check NETI's competition here
ICON vs CMDB Comparison June 2026
ICON plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON stands at 449.5K. In comparison, CMDB has a market cap of 406.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ICON is priced at $1.13, while CMDB trades at $16.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas CMDB's P/E ratio is -14.83. In terms of profitability, ICON's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CMDB's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON is more volatile compared to CMDB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.Check CMDB's competition here
ICON vs KNOP Comparison June 2026
ICON plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON stands at 449.5K. In comparison, KNOP has a market cap of 361.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ICON is priced at $1.13, while KNOP trades at $10.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas KNOP's P/E ratio is 31.59. In terms of profitability, ICON's ROE is -0.20%, compared to KNOP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON is more volatile compared to KNOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.Check KNOP's competition here
ICON vs GASS Comparison June 2026
ICON plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON stands at 449.5K. In comparison, GASS has a market cap of 357.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ICON is priced at $1.13, while GASS trades at $9.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas GASS's P/E ratio is 5.87. In terms of profitability, ICON's ROE is -0.20%, compared to GASS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON is more volatile compared to GASS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.Check GASS's competition here
ICON vs SHIP Comparison June 2026
ICON plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON stands at 449.5K. In comparison, SHIP has a market cap of 326.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ICON is priced at $1.13, while SHIP trades at $15.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas SHIP's P/E ratio is 8.58. In terms of profitability, ICON's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SHIP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON is more volatile compared to SHIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.Check SHIP's competition here
ICON vs DSX Comparison June 2026
ICON plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON stands at 449.5K. In comparison, DSX has a market cap of 289.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ICON is priced at $1.13, while DSX trades at $2.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas DSX's P/E ratio is 6.70. In terms of profitability, ICON's ROE is -0.20%, compared to DSX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON is more volatile compared to DSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.Check DSX's competition here
ICON vs OP Comparison June 2026
ICON plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON stands at 449.5K. In comparison, OP has a market cap of 279.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ICON is priced at $1.13, while OP trades at $8.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas OP's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, ICON's ROE is -0.20%, compared to OP's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON is less volatile compared to OP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.Check OP's competition here
ICON vs SMHI Comparison June 2026
ICON plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON stands at 449.5K. In comparison, SMHI has a market cap of 198.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ICON is priced at $1.13, while SMHI trades at $7.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas SMHI's P/E ratio is -6.61. In terms of profitability, ICON's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SMHI's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON is more volatile compared to SMHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.Check SMHI's competition here
ICON vs ESEAV Comparison June 2026
ICON plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON stands at 449.5K. In comparison, ESEAV has a market cap of 194.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ICON is priced at $1.13, while ESEAV trades at $27.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas ESEAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICON's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ESEAV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ICON is more volatile compared to ESEAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.Check ESEAV's competition here
ICON vs DSX-PB Comparison June 2026
ICON plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON stands at 449.5K. In comparison, DSX-PB has a market cap of 188.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ICON is priced at $1.13, while DSX-PB trades at $26.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas DSX-PB's P/E ratio is 28.67. In terms of profitability, ICON's ROE is -0.20%, compared to DSX-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON is more volatile compared to DSX-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.Check DSX-PB's competition here
ICON vs TORO Comparison June 2026
ICON plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON stands at 449.5K. In comparison, TORO has a market cap of 98.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ICON is priced at $1.13, while TORO trades at $5.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas TORO's P/E ratio is 251.00. In terms of profitability, ICON's ROE is -0.20%, compared to TORO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON is more volatile compared to TORO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.Check TORO's competition here
ICON vs HMR Comparison June 2026
ICON plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON stands at 449.5K. In comparison, HMR has a market cap of 92.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ICON is priced at $1.13, while HMR trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas HMR's P/E ratio is -11.21. In terms of profitability, ICON's ROE is -0.20%, compared to HMR's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON is less volatile compared to HMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.Check HMR's competition here
ICON vs EDRY Comparison June 2026
ICON plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON stands at 449.5K. In comparison, EDRY has a market cap of 62.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ICON is priced at $1.13, while EDRY trades at $22.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas EDRY's P/E ratio is -203.73. In terms of profitability, ICON's ROE is -0.20%, compared to EDRY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON is more volatile compared to EDRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.Check EDRY's competition here
ICON vs NM Comparison June 2026
ICON plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON stands at 449.5K. In comparison, NM has a market cap of 51.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ICON is priced at $1.13, while NM trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas NM's P/E ratio is -3.39. In terms of profitability, ICON's ROE is -0.20%, compared to NM's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON is more volatile compared to NM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.Check NM's competition here
ICON vs NM-PH Comparison June 2026
ICON plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON stands at 449.5K. In comparison, NM-PH has a market cap of 51.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ICON is priced at $1.13, while NM-PH trades at $3.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas NM-PH's P/E ratio is 0.58. In terms of profitability, ICON's ROE is -0.20%, compared to NM-PH's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON is more volatile compared to NM-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.Check NM-PH's competition here
ICON vs PXS Comparison June 2026
ICON plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON stands at 449.5K. In comparison, PXS has a market cap of 47.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ICON is priced at $1.13, while PXS trades at $4.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas PXS's P/E ratio is 13.20. In terms of profitability, ICON's ROE is -0.20%, compared to PXS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON is less volatile compared to PXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.Check PXS's competition here
ICON vs PXSAP Comparison June 2026
ICON plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON stands at 449.5K. In comparison, PXSAP has a market cap of 46.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ICON is priced at $1.13, while PXSAP trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas PXSAP's P/E ratio is -16.95. In terms of profitability, ICON's ROE is -0.20%, compared to PXSAP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON is more volatile compared to PXSAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.Check PXSAP's competition here
ICON vs GLBS Comparison June 2026
ICON plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON stands at 449.5K. In comparison, GLBS has a market cap of 45.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ICON is priced at $1.13, while GLBS trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas GLBS's P/E ratio is -26.12. In terms of profitability, ICON's ROE is -0.20%, compared to GLBS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON is more volatile compared to GLBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.Check GLBS's competition here
ICON vs EHLDV Comparison June 2026
ICON plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON stands at 449.5K. In comparison, EHLDV has a market cap of 44.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ICON is priced at $1.13, while EHLDV trades at $15.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas EHLDV's P/E ratio is 224.29. In terms of profitability, ICON's ROE is -0.20%, compared to EHLDV's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON is less volatile compared to EHLDV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.Check EHLDV's competition here
ICON vs NM-PG Comparison June 2026
ICON plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON stands at 449.5K. In comparison, NM-PG has a market cap of 31.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ICON is priced at $1.13, while NM-PG trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas NM-PG's P/E ratio is 0.89. In terms of profitability, ICON's ROE is -0.20%, compared to NM-PG's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON is more volatile compared to NM-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.Check NM-PG's competition here
ICON vs TOROV Comparison June 2026
ICON plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON stands at 449.5K. In comparison, TOROV has a market cap of 31.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ICON is priced at $1.13, while TOROV trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas TOROV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICON's ROE is -0.20%, compared to TOROV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ICON is less volatile compared to TOROV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.Check TOROV's competition here
ICON vs EHLD Comparison June 2026
ICON plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON stands at 449.5K. In comparison, EHLD has a market cap of 24.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ICON is priced at $1.13, while EHLD trades at $8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas EHLD's P/E ratio is 4.19. In terms of profitability, ICON's ROE is -0.20%, compared to EHLD's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON is more volatile compared to EHLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.Check EHLD's competition here
ICON vs CACO Comparison June 2026
ICON plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON stands at 449.5K. In comparison, CACO has a market cap of 24.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ICON is priced at $1.13, while CACO trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas CACO's P/E ratio is -2.44. In terms of profitability, ICON's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CACO's ROE of +21.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON is less volatile compared to CACO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.Check CACO's competition here
ICON vs USEA Comparison June 2026
ICON plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON stands at 449.5K. In comparison, USEA has a market cap of 23.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ICON is priced at $1.13, while USEA trades at $2.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas USEA's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, ICON's ROE is -0.20%, compared to USEA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON is more volatile compared to USEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.Check USEA's competition here
ICON vs VNTG Comparison June 2026
ICON plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON stands at 449.5K. In comparison, VNTG has a market cap of 22.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ICON is priced at $1.13, while VNTG trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas VNTG's P/E ratio is 36.00. In terms of profitability, ICON's ROE is -0.20%, compared to VNTG's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON is less volatile compared to VNTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.Check VNTG's competition here
ICON vs PSHG Comparison June 2026
ICON plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON stands at 449.5K. In comparison, PSHG has a market cap of 22.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ICON is priced at $1.13, while PSHG trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas PSHG's P/E ratio is 2.31. In terms of profitability, ICON's ROE is -0.20%, compared to PSHG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON is more volatile compared to PSHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.Check PSHG's competition here
ICON vs UFG Comparison June 2026
ICON plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON stands at 449.5K. In comparison, UFG has a market cap of 21.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ICON is priced at $1.13, while UFG trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas UFG's P/E ratio is -8.36. In terms of profitability, ICON's ROE is -0.20%, compared to UFG's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON is more volatile compared to UFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.Check UFG's competition here
ICON vs CTRM Comparison June 2026
ICON plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON stands at 449.5K. In comparison, CTRM has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ICON is priced at $1.13, while CTRM trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas CTRM's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, ICON's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CTRM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON is more volatile compared to CTRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.Check CTRM's competition here
ICON vs SVRN Comparison June 2026
ICON plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON stands at 449.5K. In comparison, SVRN has a market cap of 16.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ICON is priced at $1.13, while SVRN trades at $8.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas SVRN's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, ICON's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SVRN's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON is less volatile compared to SVRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.Check SVRN's competition here
ICON vs HTCO Comparison June 2026
ICON plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON stands at 449.5K. In comparison, HTCO has a market cap of 15.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ICON is priced at $1.13, while HTCO trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas HTCO's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, ICON's ROE is -0.20%, compared to HTCO's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON is less volatile compared to HTCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.Check HTCO's competition here
ICON vs TOPS Comparison June 2026
ICON plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON stands at 449.5K. In comparison, TOPS has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ICON is priced at $1.13, while TOPS trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas TOPS's P/E ratio is 1.38. In terms of profitability, ICON's ROE is -0.20%, compared to TOPS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON is less volatile compared to TOPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.Check TOPS's competition here
ICON vs NCT Comparison June 2026
ICON plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON stands at 449.5K. In comparison, NCT has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ICON is priced at $1.13, while NCT trades at $3.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas NCT's P/E ratio is -4.73. In terms of profitability, ICON's ROE is -0.20%, compared to NCT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON is less volatile compared to NCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.Check NCT's competition here
ICON vs CISS Comparison June 2026
ICON plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON stands at 449.5K. In comparison, CISS has a market cap of 377.6K. Regarding current trading prices, ICON is priced at $1.13, while CISS trades at $2.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas CISS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICON's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CISS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON is less volatile compared to CISS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.Check CISS's competition here
ICON vs PXSAW Comparison June 2026
ICON plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON stands at 449.5K. In comparison, PXSAW has a market cap of 217.1K. Regarding current trading prices, ICON is priced at $1.13, while PXSAW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas PXSAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICON's ROE is -0.20%, compared to PXSAW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON is less volatile compared to PXSAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.Check PXSAW's competition here
ICON vs SHIPW Comparison June 2026
ICON plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON stands at 449.5K. In comparison, SHIPW has a market cap of 75.6K. Regarding current trading prices, ICON is priced at $1.13, while SHIPW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas SHIPW's P/E ratio is 0.21. In terms of profitability, ICON's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SHIPW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON is less volatile compared to SHIPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.Check SHIPW's competition here
ICON vs RUBI Comparison June 2026
ICON plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON stands at 449.5K. In comparison, RUBI has a market cap of 2.7K. Regarding current trading prices, ICON is priced at $1.13, while RUBI trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas RUBI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICON's ROE is -0.20%, compared to RUBI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON is less volatile compared to RUBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.Check RUBI's competition here
ICON vs SHIPZ Comparison June 2026
ICON plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON stands at 449.5K. In comparison, SHIPZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ICON is priced at $1.13, while SHIPZ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas SHIPZ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ICON's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SHIPZ's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON is less volatile compared to SHIPZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.Check SHIPZ's competition here
ICON vs SBLKZ Comparison June 2026
ICON plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON stands at 449.5K. In comparison, SBLKZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ICON is priced at $1.13, while SBLKZ trades at $25.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas SBLKZ's P/E ratio is 104.92. In terms of profitability, ICON's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SBLKZ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON is more volatile compared to SBLKZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.Check SBLKZ's competition here
ICON vs GNRT Comparison June 2026
ICON plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON stands at 449.5K. In comparison, GNRT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ICON is priced at $1.13, while GNRT trades at $6.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas GNRT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICON's ROE is -0.20%, compared to GNRT's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON is more volatile compared to GNRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.Check GNRT's competition here
ICON vs RLOG Comparison June 2026
ICON plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON stands at 449.5K. In comparison, RLOG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ICON is priced at $1.13, while RLOG trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas RLOG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICON's ROE is -0.20%, compared to RLOG's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, ICON is less volatile compared to RLOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.Check RLOG's competition here
ICON vs GSLD Comparison June 2026
ICON plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICON stands at 449.5K. In comparison, GSLD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ICON is priced at $1.13, while GSLD trades at $25.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICON currently has a P/E ratio of -0.06, whereas GSLD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICON's ROE is -0.20%, compared to GSLD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ICON is more volatile compared to GSLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICON.Check GSLD's competition here