Danaos Corporation
Danaos Corporation (DAC) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (DAC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Marine Shipping Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DAC | $120.22 | +2.29% | 2.1B | 4.38 | $26.76 | +2.98% |
| KEX | $152.36 | +1.00% | 8.1B | 23.82 | $6.32 | N/A |
| MATX | $175.28 | +2.89% | 5.4B | 12.48 | $13.81 | +0.82% |
| HAFN | $8.55 | +0.83% | 4.2B | 12.60 | $0.67 | +6.41% |
| ZIM | $26.07 | -0.04% | 3.1B | 6.52 | $3.98 | +7.65% |
| CMRE-PC | $26.43 | -1.09% | 2.9B | 7.12 | $3.72 | +2.79% |
| CMBT | $12.97 | +0.74% | 2.9B | 18.35 | $0.70 | +2.04% |
| BWLP | $18.52 | +0.46% | 2.8B | 11.60 | $1.60 | +7.89% |
| SBLK | $24.44 | +1.12% | 2.8B | 33.19 | $0.73 | +2.38% |
| SB-PD | $26.17 | -0.15% | 2.7B | 17.39 | $1.51 | +3.07% |
Stock Comparison
DAC vs KEX Comparison April 2026
DAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, KEX has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, DAC is priced at $120.22, while KEX trades at $152.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.38, whereas KEX's P/E ratio is 23.82. In terms of profitability, DAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KEX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, DAC is more volatile compared to KEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAC.Check KEX's competition here
DAC vs MATX Comparison April 2026
DAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, MATX has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, DAC is priced at $120.22, while MATX trades at $175.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.38, whereas MATX's P/E ratio is 12.48. In terms of profitability, DAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MATX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, DAC is less volatile compared to MATX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAC.Check MATX's competition here
DAC vs HAFN Comparison April 2026
DAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, HAFN has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, DAC is priced at $120.22, while HAFN trades at $8.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.38, whereas HAFN's P/E ratio is 12.60. In terms of profitability, DAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HAFN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, DAC is less volatile compared to HAFN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAC.Check HAFN's competition here
DAC vs ZIM Comparison April 2026
DAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ZIM has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, DAC is priced at $120.22, while ZIM trades at $26.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.38, whereas ZIM's P/E ratio is 6.52. In terms of profitability, DAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ZIM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, DAC is more volatile compared to ZIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAC.Check ZIM's competition here
DAC vs CMRE-PC Comparison April 2026
DAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CMRE-PC has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, DAC is priced at $120.22, while CMRE-PC trades at $26.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.38, whereas CMRE-PC's P/E ratio is 7.12. In terms of profitability, DAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CMRE-PC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, DAC is more volatile compared to CMRE-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAC.Check CMRE-PC's competition here
DAC vs CMBT Comparison April 2026
DAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CMBT has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, DAC is priced at $120.22, while CMBT trades at $12.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.38, whereas CMBT's P/E ratio is 18.35. In terms of profitability, DAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CMBT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DAC is more volatile compared to CMBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAC.Check CMBT's competition here
DAC vs BWLP Comparison April 2026
DAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, BWLP has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, DAC is priced at $120.22, while BWLP trades at $18.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.38, whereas BWLP's P/E ratio is 11.60. In terms of profitability, DAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BWLP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, DAC is less volatile compared to BWLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAC.Check BWLP's competition here
DAC vs SBLK Comparison April 2026
DAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SBLK has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, DAC is priced at $120.22, while SBLK trades at $24.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.38, whereas SBLK's P/E ratio is 33.19. In terms of profitability, DAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SBLK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, DAC is less volatile compared to SBLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAC.Check SBLK's competition here
DAC vs SB-PD Comparison April 2026
DAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SB-PD has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, DAC is priced at $120.22, while SB-PD trades at $26.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.38, whereas SB-PD's P/E ratio is 17.39. In terms of profitability, DAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SB-PD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, DAC is more volatile compared to SB-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAC.Check SB-PD's competition here
DAC vs SB-PC Comparison April 2026
DAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SB-PC has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, DAC is priced at $120.22, while SB-PC trades at $26.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.38, whereas SB-PC's P/E ratio is 17.32. In terms of profitability, DAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SB-PC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, DAC is more volatile compared to SB-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAC.Check SB-PC's competition here
DAC vs CDLR Comparison April 2026
DAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CDLR has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DAC is priced at $120.22, while CDLR trades at $26.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.38, whereas CDLR's P/E ratio is 7.08. In terms of profitability, DAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CDLR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, DAC is more volatile compared to CDLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAC.Check CDLR's competition here
DAC vs NMM Comparison April 2026
DAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, NMM has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, DAC is priced at $120.22, while NMM trades at $71.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.38, whereas NMM's P/E ratio is 7.34. In terms of profitability, DAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NMM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DAC is more volatile compared to NMM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAC.Check NMM's competition here
DAC vs CMRE Comparison April 2026
DAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CMRE has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, DAC is priced at $120.22, while CMRE trades at $16.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.38, whereas CMRE's P/E ratio is 5.34. In terms of profitability, DAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CMRE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, DAC is more volatile compared to CMRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAC.Check CMRE's competition here
DAC vs ECO Comparison April 2026
DAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ECO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, DAC is priced at $120.22, while ECO trades at $53.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.38, whereas ECO's P/E ratio is 14.05. In terms of profitability, DAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ECO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, DAC is less volatile compared to ECO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAC.Check ECO's competition here
DAC vs GOGL Comparison April 2026
DAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, GOGL has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, DAC is priced at $120.22, while GOGL trades at $7.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.38, whereas GOGL's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, DAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GOGL's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DAC is more volatile compared to GOGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAC.Check GOGL's competition here
DAC vs SFL Comparison April 2026
DAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SFL has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, DAC is priced at $120.22, while SFL trades at $11.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.38, whereas SFL's P/E ratio is -54.60. In terms of profitability, DAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SFL's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, DAC is more volatile compared to SFL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAC.Check SFL's competition here
DAC vs CMRE-PD Comparison April 2026
DAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CMRE-PD has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, DAC is priced at $120.22, while CMRE-PD trades at $27.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.38, whereas CMRE-PD's P/E ratio is 7.52. In terms of profitability, DAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CMRE-PD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, DAC is more volatile compared to CMRE-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAC.Check CMRE-PD's competition here
DAC vs GSL Comparison April 2026
DAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, GSL has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, DAC is priced at $120.22, while GSL trades at $38.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.38, whereas GSL's P/E ratio is 3.40. In terms of profitability, DAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GSL's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, DAC is more volatile compared to GSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAC.Check GSL's competition here
DAC vs CMRE-PB Comparison April 2026
DAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CMRE-PB has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, DAC is priced at $120.22, while CMRE-PB trades at $26.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.38, whereas CMRE-PB's P/E ratio is 7.01. In terms of profitability, DAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CMRE-PB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, DAC is more volatile compared to CMRE-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAC.Check CMRE-PB's competition here
DAC vs SBBA Comparison April 2026
DAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SBBA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DAC is priced at $120.22, while SBBA trades at $25.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.38, whereas SBBA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SBBA's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, DAC is more volatile compared to SBBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAC.Check SBBA's competition here
DAC vs NAT Comparison April 2026
DAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, NAT has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, DAC is priced at $120.22, while NAT trades at $5.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.38, whereas NAT's P/E ratio is 92.33. In terms of profitability, DAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NAT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, DAC is less volatile compared to NAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAC.Check NAT's competition here
DAC vs CCEC Comparison April 2026
DAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CCEC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, DAC is priced at $120.22, while CCEC trades at $20.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.38, whereas CCEC's P/E ratio is 10.29. In terms of profitability, DAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CCEC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, DAC is less volatile compared to CCEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAC.Check CCEC's competition here
DAC vs GNK Comparison April 2026
DAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, GNK has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, DAC is priced at $120.22, while GNK trades at $23.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.38, whereas GNK's P/E ratio is -235.00. In terms of profitability, DAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GNK's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DAC is more volatile compared to GNK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAC.Check GNK's competition here
DAC vs CMRE-PE Comparison April 2026
DAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CMRE-PE has a market cap of 983.1M. Regarding current trading prices, DAC is priced at $120.22, while CMRE-PE trades at $42.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.38, whereas CMRE-PE's P/E ratio is 11.47. In terms of profitability, DAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CMRE-PE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, DAC is more volatile compared to CMRE-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAC.Check CMRE-PE's competition here
DAC vs CPLP Comparison April 2026
DAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CPLP has a market cap of 979.2M. Regarding current trading prices, DAC is priced at $120.22, while CPLP trades at $16.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.38, whereas CPLP's P/E ratio is 6.63. In terms of profitability, DAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CPLP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, DAC is less volatile compared to CPLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAC.Check CPLP's competition here
DAC vs GSL-PB Comparison April 2026
DAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, GSL-PB has a market cap of 974.7M. Regarding current trading prices, DAC is priced at $120.22, while GSL-PB trades at $26.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.38, whereas GSL-PB's P/E ratio is 4.36. In terms of profitability, DAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GSL-PB's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, DAC is more volatile compared to GSL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAC.Check GSL-PB's competition here
DAC vs ASC Comparison April 2026
DAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ASC has a market cap of 684.1M. Regarding current trading prices, DAC is priced at $120.22, while ASC trades at $16.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.38, whereas ASC's P/E ratio is 19.05. In terms of profitability, DAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ASC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, DAC is less volatile compared to ASC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAC.Check ASC's competition here
DAC vs SB Comparison April 2026
DAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SB has a market cap of 667.2M. Regarding current trading prices, DAC is priced at $120.22, while SB trades at $6.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.38, whereas SB's P/E ratio is 21.73. In terms of profitability, DAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, DAC is more volatile compared to SB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAC.Check SB's competition here
DAC vs HSHP Comparison April 2026
DAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, HSHP has a market cap of 632.7M. Regarding current trading prices, DAC is priced at $120.22, while HSHP trades at $13.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.38, whereas HSHP's P/E ratio is 35.45. In terms of profitability, DAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HSHP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, DAC is less volatile compared to HSHP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAC.Check HSHP's competition here
DAC vs CLCO Comparison April 2026
DAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CLCO has a market cap of 511.2M. Regarding current trading prices, DAC is priced at $120.22, while CLCO trades at $9.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.38, whereas CLCO's P/E ratio is 9.21. In terms of profitability, DAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CLCO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DAC is more volatile compared to CLCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAC.Check CLCO's competition here
DAC vs ESEA Comparison April 2026
DAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ESEA has a market cap of 480M. Regarding current trading prices, DAC is priced at $120.22, while ESEA trades at $69.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.38, whereas ESEA's P/E ratio is 3.45. In terms of profitability, DAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ESEA's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, DAC is less volatile compared to ESEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAC.Check ESEA's competition here
DAC vs PANL Comparison April 2026
DAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, PANL has a market cap of 468.3M. Regarding current trading prices, DAC is priced at $120.22, while PANL trades at $7.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.38, whereas PANL's P/E ratio is 23.90. In terms of profitability, DAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PANL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, DAC is less volatile compared to PANL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAC.Check PANL's competition here
DAC vs NETI Comparison April 2026
DAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, NETI has a market cap of 437.9M. Regarding current trading prices, DAC is priced at $120.22, while NETI trades at $11.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.38, whereas NETI's P/E ratio is -11.44. In terms of profitability, DAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NETI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, DAC is more volatile compared to NETI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAC.Check NETI's competition here
DAC vs CMDB Comparison April 2026
DAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CMDB has a market cap of 402.1M. Regarding current trading prices, DAC is priced at $120.22, while CMDB trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.38, whereas CMDB's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, DAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CMDB's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, DAC is less volatile compared to CMDB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAC.Check CMDB's competition here
DAC vs KNOP Comparison April 2026
DAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, KNOP has a market cap of 354.1M. Regarding current trading prices, DAC is priced at $120.22, while KNOP trades at $10.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.38, whereas KNOP's P/E ratio is 21.92. In terms of profitability, DAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KNOP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, DAC is more volatile compared to KNOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAC.Check KNOP's competition here
DAC vs GASS Comparison April 2026
DAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, GASS has a market cap of 348.2M. Regarding current trading prices, DAC is priced at $120.22, while GASS trades at $9.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.38, whereas GASS's P/E ratio is 5.71. In terms of profitability, DAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GASS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DAC is less volatile compared to GASS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAC.Check GASS's competition here
DAC vs DSX Comparison April 2026
DAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, DSX has a market cap of 302.1M. Regarding current trading prices, DAC is priced at $120.22, while DSX trades at $2.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.38, whereas DSX's P/E ratio is 22.23. In terms of profitability, DAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DSX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, DAC is less volatile compared to DSX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAC.Check DSX's competition here
DAC vs SHIP Comparison April 2026
DAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SHIP has a market cap of 295.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DAC is priced at $120.22, while SHIP trades at $14.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.38, whereas SHIP's P/E ratio is 13.85. In terms of profitability, DAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SHIP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DAC is less volatile compared to SHIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAC.Check SHIP's competition here
DAC vs OP Comparison April 2026
DAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, OP has a market cap of 280.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DAC is priced at $120.22, while OP trades at $8.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.38, whereas OP's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, DAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OP's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, DAC is less volatile compared to OP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAC.Check OP's competition here
DAC vs ESEAV Comparison April 2026
DAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ESEAV has a market cap of 194.8M. Regarding current trading prices, DAC is priced at $120.22, while ESEAV trades at $27.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.38, whereas ESEAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ESEAV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DAC is more volatile compared to ESEAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAC.Check ESEAV's competition here
DAC vs DSX-PB Comparison April 2026
DAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, DSX-PB has a market cap of 188.9M. Regarding current trading prices, DAC is priced at $120.22, while DSX-PB trades at $27.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.38, whereas DSX-PB's P/E ratio is 28.78. In terms of profitability, DAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DSX-PB's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, DAC is more volatile compared to DSX-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAC.Check DSX-PB's competition here
DAC vs SMHI Comparison April 2026
DAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SMHI has a market cap of 186.2M. Regarding current trading prices, DAC is priced at $120.22, while SMHI trades at $7.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.38, whereas SMHI's P/E ratio is -6.52. In terms of profitability, DAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SMHI's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DAC is less volatile compared to SMHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAC.Check SMHI's competition here
DAC vs TORO Comparison April 2026
DAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, TORO has a market cap of 123.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DAC is priced at $120.22, while TORO trades at $7.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.38, whereas TORO's P/E ratio is 115.00. In terms of profitability, DAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TORO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DAC is less volatile compared to TORO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAC.Check TORO's competition here
DAC vs HTCO Comparison April 2026
DAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, HTCO has a market cap of 61.5M. Regarding current trading prices, DAC is priced at $120.22, while HTCO trades at $23.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.38, whereas HTCO's P/E ratio is -2.69. In terms of profitability, DAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HTCO's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, DAC is less volatile compared to HTCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAC.Check HTCO's competition here
DAC vs EDRY Comparison April 2026
DAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, EDRY has a market cap of 58.8M. Regarding current trading prices, DAC is priced at $120.22, while EDRY trades at $20.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.38, whereas EDRY's P/E ratio is -13.43. In terms of profitability, DAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EDRY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, DAC is less volatile compared to EDRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAC.Check EDRY's competition here
DAC vs NM Comparison April 2026
DAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, NM has a market cap of 51.8M. Regarding current trading prices, DAC is priced at $120.22, while NM trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.38, whereas NM's P/E ratio is -3.39. In terms of profitability, DAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NM's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, DAC is more volatile compared to NM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAC.Check NM's competition here
DAC vs NM-PH Comparison April 2026
DAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, NM-PH has a market cap of 51.8M. Regarding current trading prices, DAC is priced at $120.22, while NM-PH trades at $3.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.38, whereas NM-PH's P/E ratio is 0.58. In terms of profitability, DAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NM-PH's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, DAC is more volatile compared to NM-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAC.Check NM-PH's competition here
DAC vs HMR Comparison April 2026
DAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, HMR has a market cap of 47.9M. Regarding current trading prices, DAC is priced at $120.22, while HMR trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.38, whereas HMR's P/E ratio is -5.46. In terms of profitability, DAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HMR's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, DAC is less volatile compared to HMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAC.Check HMR's competition here
DAC vs PXSAP Comparison April 2026
DAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, PXSAP has a market cap of 46.9M. Regarding current trading prices, DAC is priced at $120.22, while PXSAP trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.38, whereas PXSAP's P/E ratio is -16.95. In terms of profitability, DAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PXSAP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DAC is more volatile compared to PXSAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAC.Check PXSAP's competition here
DAC vs GLBS Comparison April 2026
DAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, GLBS has a market cap of 45.8M. Regarding current trading prices, DAC is priced at $120.22, while GLBS trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.38, whereas GLBS's P/E ratio is -26.50. In terms of profitability, DAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GLBS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, DAC is less volatile compared to GLBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAC.Check GLBS's competition here
DAC vs PXS Comparison April 2026
DAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, PXS has a market cap of 45M. Regarding current trading prices, DAC is priced at $120.22, while PXS trades at $4.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.38, whereas PXS's P/E ratio is 24.33. In terms of profitability, DAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PXS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DAC is less volatile compared to PXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAC.Check PXS's competition here
DAC vs EHLDV Comparison April 2026
DAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, EHLDV has a market cap of 44.3M. Regarding current trading prices, DAC is priced at $120.22, while EHLDV trades at $15.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.38, whereas EHLDV's P/E ratio is 224.29. In terms of profitability, DAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EHLDV's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, DAC is less volatile compared to EHLDV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAC.Check EHLDV's competition here
DAC vs NM-PG Comparison April 2026
DAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, NM-PG has a market cap of 31.7M. Regarding current trading prices, DAC is priced at $120.22, while NM-PG trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.38, whereas NM-PG's P/E ratio is 0.89. In terms of profitability, DAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NM-PG's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, DAC is less volatile compared to NM-PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAC.Check NM-PG's competition here
DAC vs TOROV Comparison April 2026
DAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, TOROV has a market cap of 31.5M. Regarding current trading prices, DAC is priced at $120.22, while TOROV trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.38, whereas TOROV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TOROV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DAC is less volatile compared to TOROV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAC.Check TOROV's competition here
DAC vs UFG Comparison April 2026
DAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, UFG has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, DAC is priced at $120.22, while UFG trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.38, whereas UFG's P/E ratio is -12.12. In terms of profitability, DAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to UFG's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, DAC is less volatile compared to UFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAC.Check UFG's competition here
DAC vs VNTG Comparison April 2026
DAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, VNTG has a market cap of 24.9M. Regarding current trading prices, DAC is priced at $120.22, while VNTG trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.38, whereas VNTG's P/E ratio is 39.29. In terms of profitability, DAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VNTG's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, DAC is less volatile compared to VNTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAC.Check VNTG's competition here
DAC vs CACO Comparison April 2026
DAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CACO has a market cap of 24.7M. Regarding current trading prices, DAC is priced at $120.22, while CACO trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.38, whereas CACO's P/E ratio is -2.44. In terms of profitability, DAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CACO's ROE of +21.38%. Regarding short-term risk, DAC is less volatile compared to CACO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAC.Check CACO's competition here
DAC vs EHLD Comparison April 2026
DAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, EHLD has a market cap of 22.9M. Regarding current trading prices, DAC is priced at $120.22, while EHLD trades at $8.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.38, whereas EHLD's P/E ratio is 1.55. In terms of profitability, DAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EHLD's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, DAC is less volatile compared to EHLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAC.Check EHLD's competition here
DAC vs PSHG Comparison April 2026
DAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, PSHG has a market cap of 22.5M. Regarding current trading prices, DAC is priced at $120.22, while PSHG trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.38, whereas PSHG's P/E ratio is 1.41. In terms of profitability, DAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PSHG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, DAC is more volatile compared to PSHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAC.Check PSHG's competition here
DAC vs USEA Comparison April 2026
DAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, USEA has a market cap of 19.6M. Regarding current trading prices, DAC is priced at $120.22, while USEA trades at $2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.38, whereas USEA's P/E ratio is -2.93. In terms of profitability, DAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to USEA's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, DAC is more volatile compared to USEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAC.Check USEA's competition here
DAC vs CTRM Comparison April 2026
DAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CTRM has a market cap of 18.6M. Regarding current trading prices, DAC is priced at $120.22, while CTRM trades at $2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.38, whereas CTRM's P/E ratio is 5.36. In terms of profitability, DAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CTRM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, DAC is less volatile compared to CTRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAC.Check CTRM's competition here
DAC vs SVRN Comparison April 2026
DAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SVRN has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, DAC is priced at $120.22, while SVRN trades at $8.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.38, whereas SVRN's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, DAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SVRN's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, DAC is more volatile compared to SVRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAC.Check SVRN's competition here
DAC vs TOPS Comparison April 2026
DAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, TOPS has a market cap of 11.6M. Regarding current trading prices, DAC is priced at $120.22, while TOPS trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.38, whereas TOPS's P/E ratio is 3.76. In terms of profitability, DAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TOPS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, DAC is less volatile compared to TOPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAC.Check TOPS's competition here
DAC vs NCT Comparison April 2026
DAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, NCT has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, DAC is priced at $120.22, while NCT trades at $2.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.38, whereas NCT's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, DAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NCT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, DAC is less volatile compared to NCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAC.Check NCT's competition here
DAC vs CISS Comparison April 2026
DAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CISS has a market cap of 521.4K. Regarding current trading prices, DAC is priced at $120.22, while CISS trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.38, whereas CISS's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, DAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CISS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, DAC is less volatile compared to CISS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAC.Check CISS's competition here
DAC vs ICON Comparison April 2026
DAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ICON has a market cap of 417.7K. Regarding current trading prices, DAC is priced at $120.22, while ICON trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.38, whereas ICON's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, DAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ICON's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, DAC is less volatile compared to ICON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAC.Check ICON's competition here
DAC vs PXSAW Comparison April 2026
DAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, PXSAW has a market cap of 217.1K. Regarding current trading prices, DAC is priced at $120.22, while PXSAW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.38, whereas PXSAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PXSAW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DAC is less volatile compared to PXSAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAC.Check PXSAW's competition here
DAC vs SHIPW Comparison April 2026
DAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SHIPW has a market cap of 75.6K. Regarding current trading prices, DAC is priced at $120.22, while SHIPW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.38, whereas SHIPW's P/E ratio is 0.21. In terms of profitability, DAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SHIPW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DAC is less volatile compared to SHIPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAC.Check SHIPW's competition here
DAC vs RUBI Comparison April 2026
DAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, RUBI has a market cap of 17.3K. Regarding current trading prices, DAC is priced at $120.22, while RUBI trades at $3.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.38, whereas RUBI's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, DAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RUBI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, DAC is less volatile compared to RUBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAC.Check RUBI's competition here
DAC vs SHIPZ Comparison April 2026
DAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SHIPZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, DAC is priced at $120.22, while SHIPZ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.38, whereas SHIPZ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, DAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SHIPZ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DAC is less volatile compared to SHIPZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAC.Check SHIPZ's competition here
DAC vs RLOG Comparison April 2026
DAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, RLOG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, DAC is priced at $120.22, while RLOG trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.38, whereas RLOG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RLOG's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, DAC is less volatile compared to RLOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAC.Check RLOG's competition here
DAC vs SBLKZ Comparison April 2026
DAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SBLKZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, DAC is priced at $120.22, while SBLKZ trades at $25.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.38, whereas SBLKZ's P/E ratio is 104.92. In terms of profitability, DAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SBLKZ's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, DAC is more volatile compared to SBLKZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAC.Check SBLKZ's competition here
DAC vs GSLD Comparison April 2026
DAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, GSLD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, DAC is priced at $120.22, while GSLD trades at $25.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.38, whereas GSLD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GSLD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DAC is more volatile compared to GSLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAC.Check GSLD's competition here
DAC vs GNRT Comparison April 2026
DAC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAC stands at 2.1B. In comparison, GNRT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, DAC is priced at $120.22, while GNRT trades at $6.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAC currently has a P/E ratio of 4.38, whereas GNRT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DAC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GNRT's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, DAC is less volatile compared to GNRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAC.Check GNRT's competition here