Nordic American Tankers Limited (NAT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NAT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Marine Shipping Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NAT | $5.91 | +6.29% | 1.2B | 26.90 | $0.22 | +10.67% |
| FRO | $37.11 | +6.95% | 8.2B | 8.99 | $4.09 | +8.52% |
| KEX | $130.88 | -0.07% | 6.9B | 19.98 | $6.50 | N/A |
| MATX | $202.03 | -0.93% | 6.2B | 14.95 | $13.61 | +0.71% |
| STNG | $74.13 | +6.61% | 3.6B | 9.68 | $7.54 | +2.36% |
| HAFN | $7.15 | +8.92% | 3.5B | 7.71 | $0.91 | +10.43% |
| CMBT | $15.23 | +8.40% | 3.3B | 8.62 | $1.69 | +5.84% |
| ZIM | $23.91 | -5.23% | 3.1B | -284.11 | -$0.09 | +7.78% |
| SBLK | $26.19 | +5.55% | 2.8B | 15.72 | $1.60 | +4.10% |
| BWLP | $19.05 | +8.83% | 2.8B | 7.72 | $2.38 | +10.09% |
Stock Comparison
NAT vs FRO Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FRO has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while FRO trades at $37.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas FRO's P/E ratio is 8.99. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FRO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to FRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check FRO's competition here
NAT vs KEX Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KEX has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while KEX trades at $130.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas KEX's P/E ratio is 19.98. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KEX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to KEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check KEX's competition here
NAT vs MATX Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MATX has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while MATX trades at $202.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas MATX's P/E ratio is 14.95. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MATX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to MATX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check MATX's competition here
NAT vs STNG Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, STNG has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while STNG trades at $74.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas STNG's P/E ratio is 9.68. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to STNG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to STNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check STNG's competition here
NAT vs HAFN Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, HAFN has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while HAFN trades at $7.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas HAFN's P/E ratio is 7.71. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HAFN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to HAFN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check HAFN's competition here
NAT vs CMBT Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CMBT has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while CMBT trades at $15.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas CMBT's P/E ratio is 8.62. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CMBT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to CMBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check CMBT's competition here
NAT vs ZIM Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ZIM has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while ZIM trades at $23.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas ZIM's P/E ratio is -284.11. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZIM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to ZIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check ZIM's competition here
NAT vs SBLK Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SBLK has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while SBLK trades at $26.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas SBLK's P/E ratio is 15.72. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SBLK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to SBLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check SBLK's competition here
NAT vs BWLP Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BWLP has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while BWLP trades at $19.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas BWLP's P/E ratio is 7.72. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BWLP's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to BWLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check BWLP's competition here
NAT vs DHT Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DHT has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while DHT trades at $17.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas DHT's P/E ratio is 8.86. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DHT's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to DHT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check DHT's competition here
NAT vs SB-PC Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SB-PC has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while SB-PC trades at $26.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas SB-PC's P/E ratio is 52.04. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SB-PC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to SB-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check SB-PC's competition here
NAT vs SB-PD Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SB-PD has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while SB-PD trades at $26.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas SB-PD's P/E ratio is 51.46. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SB-PD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to SB-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check SB-PD's competition here
NAT vs TNK Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TNK has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while TNK trades at $69.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas TNK's P/E ratio is 7.16. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TNK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to TNK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check TNK's competition here
NAT vs DAC Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DAC has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while DAC trades at $125.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas DAC's P/E ratio is 4.54. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DAC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to DAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check DAC's competition here
NAT vs CDLR Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CDLR has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while CDLR trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas CDLR's P/E ratio is 6.39. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CDLR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to CDLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check CDLR's competition here
NAT vs NMM Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NMM has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while NMM trades at $74.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas NMM's P/E ratio is 6.18. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NMM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to NMM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check NMM's competition here
NAT vs CMRE-PC Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CMRE-PC has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while CMRE-PC trades at $26.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas CMRE-PC's P/E ratio is 9.80. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CMRE-PC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to CMRE-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check CMRE-PC's competition here
NAT vs ECO Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ECO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while ECO trades at $54.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas ECO's P/E ratio is 9.30. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ECO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to ECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check ECO's competition here
NAT vs CMRE Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CMRE has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while CMRE trades at $14.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas CMRE's P/E ratio is 5.07. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CMRE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to CMRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check CMRE's competition here
NAT vs GOGL Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GOGL has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while GOGL trades at $7.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas GOGL's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GOGL's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to GOGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check GOGL's competition here
NAT vs FLNG Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FLNG has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while FLNG trades at $30.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas FLNG's P/E ratio is 17.97. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FLNG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to FLNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check FLNG's competition here
NAT vs CMRE-PD Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CMRE-PD has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while CMRE-PD trades at $28.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas CMRE-PD's P/E ratio is 10.09. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CMRE-PD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to CMRE-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check CMRE-PD's competition here
NAT vs SFL Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SFL has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while SFL trades at $10.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas SFL's P/E ratio is 504.53. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SFL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to SFL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check SFL's competition here
NAT vs GSL Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GSL has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while GSL trades at $39.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas GSL's P/E ratio is 3.75. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GSL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to GSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check GSL's competition here
NAT vs CMRE-PB Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CMRE-PB has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while CMRE-PB trades at $26.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas CMRE-PB's P/E ratio is 9.34. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CMRE-PB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to CMRE-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check CMRE-PB's competition here
NAT vs GSL-PB Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GSL-PB has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while GSL-PB trades at $26.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas GSL-PB's P/E ratio is 2.61. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GSL-PB's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to GSL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check GSL-PB's competition here
NAT vs CCEC Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CCEC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while CCEC trades at $22.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas CCEC's P/E ratio is 36.00. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CCEC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to CCEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check CCEC's competition here
NAT vs SBBA Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SBBA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while SBBA trades at $25.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas SBBA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SBBA's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to SBBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check SBBA's competition here
NAT vs NVGS Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NVGS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while NVGS trades at $19.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas NVGS's P/E ratio is 14.48. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NVGS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to NVGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check NVGS's competition here
NAT vs GNK Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GNK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while GNK trades at $24.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas GNK's P/E ratio is 49.00. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GNK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to GNK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check GNK's competition here
NAT vs CMRE-PE Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CMRE-PE has a market cap of 983.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while CMRE-PE trades at $42.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas CMRE-PE's P/E ratio is 11.47. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CMRE-PE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to CMRE-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check CMRE-PE's competition here
NAT vs CPLP Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CPLP has a market cap of 979.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while CPLP trades at $16.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas CPLP's P/E ratio is 6.63. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CPLP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to CPLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check CPLP's competition here
NAT vs HSHP Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, HSHP has a market cap of 666.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while HSHP trades at $14.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas HSHP's P/E ratio is 22.44. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HSHP's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to HSHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check HSHP's competition here
NAT vs SB Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SB has a market cap of 651.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while SB trades at $6.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas SB's P/E ratio is 14.22. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to SB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check SB's competition here
NAT vs ASC Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ASC has a market cap of 606.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while ASC trades at $15.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas ASC's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ASC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to ASC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check ASC's competition here
NAT vs CLCO Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CLCO has a market cap of 511.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while CLCO trades at $9.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas CLCO's P/E ratio is 9.21. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CLCO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to CLCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check CLCO's competition here
NAT vs ESEA Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ESEA has a market cap of 468.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while ESEA trades at $68.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas ESEA's P/E ratio is 3.87. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ESEA's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to ESEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check ESEA's competition here
NAT vs CMDB Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CMDB has a market cap of 440.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while CMDB trades at $18.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas CMDB's P/E ratio is 27.55. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CMDB's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to CMDB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check CMDB's competition here
NAT vs NETI Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NETI has a market cap of 437.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while NETI trades at $11.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas NETI's P/E ratio is -11.44. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NETI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to NETI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check NETI's competition here
NAT vs PANL Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PANL has a market cap of 431.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while PANL trades at $6.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas PANL's P/E ratio is 15.71. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PANL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to PANL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check PANL's competition here
NAT vs GLOP-PB Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GLOP-PB has a market cap of 415.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while GLOP-PB trades at $26.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas GLOP-PB's P/E ratio is 14.49. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GLOP-PB's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to GLOP-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check GLOP-PB's competition here
NAT vs KNOP Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KNOP has a market cap of 336.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while KNOP trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas KNOP's P/E ratio is 9.89. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KNOP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to KNOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check KNOP's competition here
NAT vs GASS Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GASS has a market cap of 305.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while GASS trades at $8.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas GASS's P/E ratio is 4.72. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GASS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to GASS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check GASS's competition here
NAT vs SHIP Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SHIP has a market cap of 283.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while SHIP trades at $14.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas SHIP's P/E ratio is 6.22. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SHIP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to SHIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check SHIP's competition here
NAT vs DSX Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DSX has a market cap of 259.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while DSX trades at $2.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas DSX's P/E ratio is 14.29. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DSX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to DSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check DSX's competition here
NAT vs SMHI Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SMHI has a market cap of 205.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while SMHI trades at $7.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas SMHI's P/E ratio is -5.98. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SMHI's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to SMHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check SMHI's competition here
NAT vs ESEAV Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ESEAV has a market cap of 194.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while ESEAV trades at $27.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas ESEAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ESEAV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to ESEAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check ESEAV's competition here
NAT vs DSX-PB Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DSX-PB has a market cap of 190M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while DSX-PB trades at $27.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas DSX-PB's P/E ratio is 77.86. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DSX-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to DSX-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check DSX-PB's competition here
NAT vs DLNG-PA Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DLNG-PA has a market cap of 130.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while DLNG-PA trades at $26.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas DLNG-PA's P/E ratio is 17.70. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DLNG-PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to DLNG-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check DLNG-PA's competition here
NAT vs DLNG Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DLNG has a market cap of 129.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while DLNG trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas DLNG's P/E ratio is 2.88. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DLNG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to DLNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check DLNG's competition here
NAT vs TORO Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TORO has a market cap of 98M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while TORO trades at $4.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas TORO's P/E ratio is 110.11. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TORO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to TORO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check TORO's competition here
NAT vs HMR Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, HMR has a market cap of 70.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while HMR trades at $1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas HMR's P/E ratio is 30.00. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HMR's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is less volatile compared to HMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check HMR's competition here
NAT vs GLBS Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GLBS has a market cap of 66.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while GLBS trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas GLBS's P/E ratio is 61.80. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GLBS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to GLBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check GLBS's competition here
NAT vs EDRY Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EDRY has a market cap of 63.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while EDRY trades at $22.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas EDRY's P/E ratio is -64.97. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EDRY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to EDRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check EDRY's competition here
NAT vs NM Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NM has a market cap of 51.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while NM trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas NM's P/E ratio is -3.39. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NM's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to NM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check NM's competition here
NAT vs NM-PH Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NM-PH has a market cap of 51.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while NM-PH trades at $3.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas NM-PH's P/E ratio is 0.58. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NM-PH's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to NM-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check NM-PH's competition here
NAT vs PXSAP Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PXSAP has a market cap of 46.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while PXSAP trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas PXSAP's P/E ratio is -16.95. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PXSAP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to PXSAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check PXSAP's competition here
NAT vs EHLDV Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EHLDV has a market cap of 44.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while EHLDV trades at $15.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas EHLDV's P/E ratio is 224.29. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EHLDV's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is less volatile compared to EHLDV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check EHLDV's competition here
NAT vs PXS Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PXS has a market cap of 43M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while PXS trades at $4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas PXS's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PXS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to PXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check PXS's competition here
NAT vs NM-PG Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NM-PG has a market cap of 31.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while NM-PG trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas NM-PG's P/E ratio is 0.89. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NM-PG's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to NM-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check NM-PG's competition here
NAT vs TOROV Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TOROV has a market cap of 31.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while TOROV trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas TOROV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TOROV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is less volatile compared to TOROV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check TOROV's competition here
NAT vs USEA Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, USEA has a market cap of 25.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while USEA trades at $2.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas USEA's P/E ratio is 53.20. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USEA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to USEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check USEA's competition here
NAT vs CACO Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CACO has a market cap of 24.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while CACO trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas CACO's P/E ratio is -2.44. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CACO's ROE of +21.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is less volatile compared to CACO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check CACO's competition here
NAT vs EHLD Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EHLD has a market cap of 22.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while EHLD trades at $8.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas EHLD's P/E ratio is 3.03. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EHLD's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to EHLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check EHLD's competition here
NAT vs UFG Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, UFG has a market cap of 22.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while UFG trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas UFG's P/E ratio is -12.12. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UFG's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is less volatile compared to UFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check UFG's competition here
NAT vs CTRM Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CTRM has a market cap of 21.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while CTRM trades at $2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas CTRM's P/E ratio is 1.67. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CTRM's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is less volatile compared to CTRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check CTRM's competition here
NAT vs VNTG Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, VNTG has a market cap of 20.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while VNTG trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas VNTG's P/E ratio is 33.00. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VNTG's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is less volatile compared to VNTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check VNTG's competition here
NAT vs HTCO Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, HTCO has a market cap of 20.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while HTCO trades at $3.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas HTCO's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HTCO's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is less volatile compared to HTCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check HTCO's competition here
NAT vs PSHG Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PSHG has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while PSHG trades at $1.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas PSHG's P/E ratio is 2.10. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PSHG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to PSHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check PSHG's competition here
NAT vs RUBI Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, RUBI has a market cap of 16.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while RUBI trades at $5.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas RUBI's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RUBI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to RUBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check RUBI's competition here
NAT vs SVRN Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SVRN has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while SVRN trades at $8.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas SVRN's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SVRN's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is less volatile compared to SVRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check SVRN's competition here
NAT vs TOPS Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TOPS has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while TOPS trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas TOPS's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TOPS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to TOPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check TOPS's competition here
NAT vs NCT Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NCT has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while NCT trades at $3.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas NCT's P/E ratio is -1.31. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NCT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is less volatile compared to NCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check NCT's competition here
NAT vs ICON Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ICON has a market cap of 413.7K. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while ICON trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas ICON's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ICON's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is less volatile compared to ICON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check ICON's competition here
NAT vs CISS Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CISS has a market cap of 315.8K. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while CISS trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas CISS's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CISS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to CISS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check CISS's competition here
NAT vs PXSAW Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PXSAW has a market cap of 217.1K. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while PXSAW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas PXSAW's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PXSAW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is less volatile compared to PXSAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check PXSAW's competition here
NAT vs SHIPW Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SHIPW has a market cap of 75.6K. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while SHIPW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas SHIPW's P/E ratio is 0.21. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SHIPW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is less volatile compared to SHIPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check SHIPW's competition here
NAT vs SHIPZ Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SHIPZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while SHIPZ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas SHIPZ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SHIPZ's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is less volatile compared to SHIPZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check SHIPZ's competition here
NAT vs RLOG Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, RLOG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while RLOG trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas RLOG's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RLOG's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is less volatile compared to RLOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check RLOG's competition here
NAT vs GNRT Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GNRT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while GNRT trades at $6.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas GNRT's P/E ratio is -2.38. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GNRT's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to GNRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check GNRT's competition here
NAT vs GSLD Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GSLD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while GSLD trades at $25.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas GSLD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GSLD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to GSLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check GSLD's competition here
NAT vs SBLKZ Comparison July 2026
NAT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAT stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SBLKZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NAT is priced at $5.91, while SBLKZ trades at $25.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAT currently has a P/E ratio of 26.90, whereas SBLKZ's P/E ratio is 104.92. In terms of profitability, NAT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SBLKZ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NAT is more volatile compared to SBLKZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAT.Check SBLKZ's competition here