ZF Commercial Vehicle Control Systems India Limited (ZFCVINDIA.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ZFCVINDIA.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZFCVINDIA.NS | ₹2,609.00 | -1.92% | 296.9B | 9.62 | ₹271.30 | +0.73% |
| MOTHERSON.NS | ₹151.85 | +5.03% | 1.6T | 41.17 | ₹3.69 | +0.38% |
| MOTHERSON.BO | ₹151.70 | +4.95% | 1.6T | 41.56 | ₹3.65 | +0.38% |
| BOSCHLTD.BO | ₹40,705.00 | +0.74% | 1.2T | 43.32 | ₹939.62 | +1.26% |
| BOSCHLTD.NS | ₹40,600.00 | +0.58% | 1.2T | 43.06 | ₹942.92 | +1.26% |
| BHARATFORG.NS | ₹2,145.00 | +1.05% | 1T | 82.22 | ₹26.09 | +0.37% |
| BHARATFORG.BO | ₹2,145.05 | +1.02% | 1T | 82.53 | ₹25.99 | +0.37% |
| UNOMINDA.BO | ₹1,138.35 | +3.29% | 658.2B | 53.75 | ₹21.18 | +0.23% |
| UNOMINDA.NS | ₹1,137.00 | +3.04% | 656.6B | 53.63 | ₹21.20 | +0.23% |
| SCHAEFFLER.NS | ₹4,151.00 | -0.84% | 648.8B | 57.55 | ₹72.13 | +0.84% |
Stock Comparison
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs MOTHERSON.NS Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, MOTHERSON.NS has a market cap of 1.6T. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while MOTHERSON.NS trades at ₹151.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas MOTHERSON.NS's P/E ratio is 41.17. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MOTHERSON.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to MOTHERSON.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check MOTHERSON.NS's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs MOTHERSON.BO Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, MOTHERSON.BO has a market cap of 1.6T. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while MOTHERSON.BO trades at ₹151.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas MOTHERSON.BO's P/E ratio is 41.56. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MOTHERSON.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to MOTHERSON.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check MOTHERSON.BO's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs BOSCHLTD.BO Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, BOSCHLTD.BO has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while BOSCHLTD.BO trades at ₹40,705.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas BOSCHLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 43.32. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BOSCHLTD.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to BOSCHLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check BOSCHLTD.BO's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs BOSCHLTD.NS Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, BOSCHLTD.NS has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while BOSCHLTD.NS trades at ₹40,600.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas BOSCHLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 43.06. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BOSCHLTD.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to BOSCHLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check BOSCHLTD.NS's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs BHARATFORG.NS Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, BHARATFORG.NS has a market cap of 1T. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while BHARATFORG.NS trades at ₹2,145.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas BHARATFORG.NS's P/E ratio is 82.22. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BHARATFORG.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is more volatile compared to BHARATFORG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check BHARATFORG.NS's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs BHARATFORG.BO Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, BHARATFORG.BO has a market cap of 1T. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while BHARATFORG.BO trades at ₹2,145.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas BHARATFORG.BO's P/E ratio is 82.53. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BHARATFORG.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is more volatile compared to BHARATFORG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check BHARATFORG.BO's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs UNOMINDA.BO Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, UNOMINDA.BO has a market cap of 658.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while UNOMINDA.BO trades at ₹1,138.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas UNOMINDA.BO's P/E ratio is 53.75. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to UNOMINDA.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to UNOMINDA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check UNOMINDA.BO's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs UNOMINDA.NS Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, UNOMINDA.NS has a market cap of 656.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while UNOMINDA.NS trades at ₹1,137.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas UNOMINDA.NS's P/E ratio is 53.63. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to UNOMINDA.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to UNOMINDA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check UNOMINDA.NS's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs SCHAEFFLER.NS Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, SCHAEFFLER.NS has a market cap of 648.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while SCHAEFFLER.NS trades at ₹4,151.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas SCHAEFFLER.NS's P/E ratio is 57.55. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SCHAEFFLER.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is more volatile compared to SCHAEFFLER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check SCHAEFFLER.NS's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs SCHAEFFLER.BO Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, SCHAEFFLER.BO has a market cap of 648.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while SCHAEFFLER.BO trades at ₹4,144.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas SCHAEFFLER.BO's P/E ratio is 54.81. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SCHAEFFLER.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is more volatile compared to SCHAEFFLER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check SCHAEFFLER.BO's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs MRF.NS Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, MRF.NS has a market cap of 550.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while MRF.NS trades at ₹129,885.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas MRF.NS's P/E ratio is 22.77. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MRF.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is more volatile compared to MRF.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check MRF.NS's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs MRF.BO Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, MRF.BO has a market cap of 550.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while MRF.BO trades at ₹129,415.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas MRF.BO's P/E ratio is 22.40. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MRF.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is more volatile compared to MRF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check MRF.BO's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs BALKRISIND.NS Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, BALKRISIND.NS has a market cap of 432.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while BALKRISIND.NS trades at ₹2,235.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas BALKRISIND.NS's P/E ratio is 32.75. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BALKRISIND.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to BALKRISIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check BALKRISIND.NS's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs BALKRISIND.BO Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, BALKRISIND.BO has a market cap of 432.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while BALKRISIND.BO trades at ₹2,234.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas BALKRISIND.BO's P/E ratio is 35.06. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BALKRISIND.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is more volatile compared to BALKRISIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check BALKRISIND.BO's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs SONACOMS.BO Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, SONACOMS.BO has a market cap of 387.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while SONACOMS.BO trades at ₹620.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas SONACOMS.BO's P/E ratio is 57.47. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SONACOMS.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is more volatile compared to SONACOMS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check SONACOMS.BO's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs SONACOMS.NS Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, SONACOMS.NS has a market cap of 385.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while SONACOMS.NS trades at ₹619.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas SONACOMS.NS's P/E ratio is 56.83. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SONACOMS.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is more volatile compared to SONACOMS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check SONACOMS.NS's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs ENDURANCE.BO Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, ENDURANCE.BO has a market cap of 380.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while ENDURANCE.BO trades at ₹2,703.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas ENDURANCE.BO's P/E ratio is 39.26. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ENDURANCE.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to ENDURANCE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check ENDURANCE.BO's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs ENDURANCE.NS Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, ENDURANCE.NS has a market cap of 380.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while ENDURANCE.NS trades at ₹2,702.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas ENDURANCE.NS's P/E ratio is 38.53. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ENDURANCE.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to ENDURANCE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check ENDURANCE.NS's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs EXIDEIND.BO Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, EXIDEIND.BO has a market cap of 332B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while EXIDEIND.BO trades at ₹389.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas EXIDEIND.BO's P/E ratio is 32.41. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EXIDEIND.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to EXIDEIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check EXIDEIND.BO's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs EXIDEIND.NS Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, EXIDEIND.NS has a market cap of 331.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while EXIDEIND.NS trades at ₹390.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas EXIDEIND.NS's P/E ratio is 30.95. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EXIDEIND.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to EXIDEIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check EXIDEIND.NS's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs ZFCVINDIA.BO Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, ZFCVINDIA.BO has a market cap of 296.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while ZFCVINDIA.BO trades at ₹2,608.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas ZFCVINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 9.61. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ZFCVINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to ZFCVINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check ZFCVINDIA.BO's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs TVSHLTD.BO Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, TVSHLTD.BO has a market cap of 274.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while TVSHLTD.BO trades at ₹13,553.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas TVSHLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 16.17. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TVSHLTD.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to TVSHLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check TVSHLTD.BO's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs APOLLOTYRE.NS Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, APOLLOTYRE.NS has a market cap of 273.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while APOLLOTYRE.NS trades at ₹430.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas APOLLOTYRE.NS's P/E ratio is 13.55. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to APOLLOTYRE.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to APOLLOTYRE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check APOLLOTYRE.NS's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs TVSHLTD.NS Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, TVSHLTD.NS has a market cap of 273.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while TVSHLTD.NS trades at ₹13,501.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas TVSHLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 16.11. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TVSHLTD.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is more volatile compared to TVSHLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check TVSHLTD.NS's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs APOLLOTYRE.BO Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, APOLLOTYRE.BO has a market cap of 273B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while APOLLOTYRE.BO trades at ₹430.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas APOLLOTYRE.BO's P/E ratio is 14.74. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to APOLLOTYRE.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to APOLLOTYRE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check APOLLOTYRE.BO's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs MSUMI.BO Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, MSUMI.BO has a market cap of 272.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while MSUMI.BO trades at ₹41.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas MSUMI.BO's P/E ratio is 42.77. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MSUMI.BO's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to MSUMI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check MSUMI.BO's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs MSUMI.NS Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, MSUMI.NS has a market cap of 272.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while MSUMI.NS trades at ₹41.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas MSUMI.NS's P/E ratio is 42.51. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MSUMI.NS's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to MSUMI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check MSUMI.NS's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs CRAFTSMAN.NS Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, CRAFTSMAN.NS has a market cap of 242B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while CRAFTSMAN.NS trades at ₹9,252.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas CRAFTSMAN.NS's P/E ratio is 55.34. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CRAFTSMAN.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is more volatile compared to CRAFTSMAN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check CRAFTSMAN.NS's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs ASAHIINDIA.BO Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, ASAHIINDIA.BO has a market cap of 230.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while ASAHIINDIA.BO trades at ₹901.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas ASAHIINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 66.10. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ASAHIINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to ASAHIINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check ASAHIINDIA.BO's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs CRAFTSMAN.BO Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, CRAFTSMAN.BO has a market cap of 219.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while CRAFTSMAN.BO trades at ₹9,216.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas CRAFTSMAN.BO's P/E ratio is 55.67. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CRAFTSMAN.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is more volatile compared to CRAFTSMAN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check CRAFTSMAN.BO's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs BELRISE.NS Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, BELRISE.NS has a market cap of 218.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while BELRISE.NS trades at ₹245.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas BELRISE.NS's P/E ratio is 55.91. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BELRISE.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to BELRISE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check BELRISE.NS's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs BELRISE.BO Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, BELRISE.BO has a market cap of 218.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while BELRISE.BO trades at ₹245.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas BELRISE.BO's P/E ratio is 55.75. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BELRISE.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to BELRISE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check BELRISE.BO's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs SUNDRMFAST.BO Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, SUNDRMFAST.BO has a market cap of 196B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while SUNDRMFAST.BO trades at ₹930.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas SUNDRMFAST.BO's P/E ratio is 33.01. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SUNDRMFAST.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is more volatile compared to SUNDRMFAST.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check SUNDRMFAST.BO's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs SUNDRMFAST.NS Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, SUNDRMFAST.NS has a market cap of 194.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while SUNDRMFAST.NS trades at ₹927.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas SUNDRMFAST.NS's P/E ratio is 33.49. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SUNDRMFAST.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to SUNDRMFAST.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check SUNDRMFAST.NS's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs MAHINDCIE.NS Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, MAHINDCIE.NS has a market cap of 194.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while MAHINDCIE.NS trades at ₹512.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas MAHINDCIE.NS's P/E ratio is 30.59. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MAHINDCIE.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to MAHINDCIE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check MAHINDCIE.NS's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs CIEINDIA.NS Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, CIEINDIA.NS has a market cap of 179.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while CIEINDIA.NS trades at ₹473.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas CIEINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 20.71. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CIEINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is more volatile compared to CIEINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check CIEINDIA.NS's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs CIEINDIA.BO Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, CIEINDIA.BO has a market cap of 178.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while CIEINDIA.BO trades at ₹470.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas CIEINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 21.27. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CIEINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is more volatile compared to CIEINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check CIEINDIA.BO's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs SHRIPISTON.NS Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, SHRIPISTON.NS has a market cap of 177.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while SHRIPISTON.NS trades at ₹4,032.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas SHRIPISTON.NS's P/E ratio is 31.01. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SHRIPISTON.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to SHRIPISTON.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check SHRIPISTON.NS's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs GABRIEL.NS Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, GABRIEL.NS has a market cap of 175.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while GABRIEL.NS trades at ₹1,222.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas GABRIEL.NS's P/E ratio is 69.83. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GABRIEL.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to GABRIEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check GABRIEL.NS's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs GABRIEL.BO Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, GABRIEL.BO has a market cap of 175.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while GABRIEL.BO trades at ₹1,222.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas GABRIEL.BO's P/E ratio is 68.16. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GABRIEL.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to GABRIEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check GABRIEL.BO's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs JBMA.NS Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, JBMA.NS has a market cap of 164.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while JBMA.NS trades at ₹694.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas JBMA.NS's P/E ratio is 77.82. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JBMA.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to JBMA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check JBMA.NS's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs JBMA.BO Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, JBMA.BO has a market cap of 164.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while JBMA.BO trades at ₹692.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas JBMA.BO's P/E ratio is 77.54. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JBMA.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is more volatile compared to JBMA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check JBMA.BO's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs MINDACORP.BO Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, MINDACORP.BO has a market cap of 158B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while MINDACORP.BO trades at ₹672.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas MINDACORP.BO's P/E ratio is 45.03. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MINDACORP.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to MINDACORP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check MINDACORP.BO's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs MINDACORP.NS Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, MINDACORP.NS has a market cap of 157.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while MINDACORP.NS trades at ₹670.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas MINDACORP.NS's P/E ratio is 44.84. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MINDACORP.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to MINDACORP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check MINDACORP.NS's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs MAHSCOOTER.NS Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, MAHSCOOTER.NS has a market cap of 142.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while MAHSCOOTER.NS trades at ₹12,500.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas MAHSCOOTER.NS's P/E ratio is 43.71. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MAHSCOOTER.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is more volatile compared to MAHSCOOTER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check MAHSCOOTER.NS's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs MAHSCOOTER.BO Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, MAHSCOOTER.BO has a market cap of 142.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while MAHSCOOTER.BO trades at ₹12,485.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas MAHSCOOTER.BO's P/E ratio is 45.95. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MAHSCOOTER.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is more volatile compared to MAHSCOOTER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check MAHSCOOTER.BO's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs CEATLTD.BO Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, CEATLTD.BO has a market cap of 141.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while CEATLTD.BO trades at ₹3,488.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas CEATLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 18.44. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CEATLTD.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is more volatile compared to CEATLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check CEATLTD.BO's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs CEATLTD.NS Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, CEATLTD.NS has a market cap of 140.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while CEATLTD.NS trades at ₹3,480.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas CEATLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 19.94. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CEATLTD.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is more volatile compared to CEATLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check CEATLTD.NS's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs JKTYRE.NS Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, JKTYRE.NS has a market cap of 114.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while JKTYRE.NS trades at ₹397.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas JKTYRE.NS's P/E ratio is 13.86. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JKTYRE.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to JKTYRE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check JKTYRE.NS's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs JKTYRE.BO Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, JKTYRE.BO has a market cap of 114.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while JKTYRE.BO trades at ₹397.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas JKTYRE.BO's P/E ratio is 11.98. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JKTYRE.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to JKTYRE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check JKTYRE.BO's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs SUNCLAYLTD.NS Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, SUNCLAYLTD.NS has a market cap of 109.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while SUNCLAYLTD.NS trades at ₹5,426.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas SUNCLAYLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 16.90. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SUNCLAYLTD.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to SUNCLAYLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check SUNCLAYLTD.NS's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs LUMAXTECH.NS Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, LUMAXTECH.NS has a market cap of 105.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while LUMAXTECH.NS trades at ₹1,548.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas LUMAXTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 35.42. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LUMAXTECH.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to LUMAXTECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check LUMAXTECH.NS's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs LUMAXTECH.BO Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, LUMAXTECH.BO has a market cap of 105.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while LUMAXTECH.BO trades at ₹1,546.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas LUMAXTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 37.83. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LUMAXTECH.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to LUMAXTECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check LUMAXTECH.BO's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs BANCOINDIA.NS Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, BANCOINDIA.NS has a market cap of 94.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while BANCOINDIA.NS trades at ₹658.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas BANCOINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 19.70. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BANCOINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to BANCOINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check BANCOINDIA.NS's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs BANCOINDIA.BO Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, BANCOINDIA.BO has a market cap of 94.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while BANCOINDIA.BO trades at ₹660.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas BANCOINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 19.75. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BANCOINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to BANCOINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check BANCOINDIA.BO's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs VARROC.NS Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, VARROC.NS has a market cap of 93.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while VARROC.NS trades at ₹611.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas VARROC.NS's P/E ratio is 37.42. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VARROC.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is more volatile compared to VARROC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check VARROC.NS's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs VARROC.BO Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, VARROC.BO has a market cap of 92.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while VARROC.BO trades at ₹609.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas VARROC.BO's P/E ratio is 33.52. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VARROC.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is more volatile compared to VARROC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check VARROC.BO's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs ASKAUTOLTD.NS Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, ASKAUTOLTD.NS has a market cap of 91.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while ASKAUTOLTD.NS trades at ₹465.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas ASKAUTOLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 33.31. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ASKAUTOLTD.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is more volatile compared to ASKAUTOLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check ASKAUTOLTD.NS's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs ASKAUTOLTD.BO Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, ASKAUTOLTD.BO has a market cap of 91.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while ASKAUTOLTD.BO trades at ₹465.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas ASKAUTOLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 33.32. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ASKAUTOLTD.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is more volatile compared to ASKAUTOLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check ASKAUTOLTD.BO's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs BENGALASM.BO Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, BENGALASM.BO has a market cap of 73.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while BENGALASM.BO trades at ₹6,448.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas BENGALASM.BO's P/E ratio is 2.35. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BENGALASM.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is more volatile compared to BENGALASM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check BENGALASM.BO's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs PRICOLLTD.NS Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, PRICOLLTD.NS has a market cap of 71.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while PRICOLLTD.NS trades at ₹583.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas PRICOLLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 28.65. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PRICOLLTD.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to PRICOLLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check PRICOLLTD.NS's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs PRICOLLTD.BO Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, PRICOLLTD.BO has a market cap of 71B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while PRICOLLTD.BO trades at ₹583.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas PRICOLLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 28.63. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PRICOLLTD.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to PRICOLLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check PRICOLLTD.BO's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs DYNAMATECH.BO Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, DYNAMATECH.BO has a market cap of 69.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while DYNAMATECH.BO trades at ₹10,200.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas DYNAMATECH.BO's P/E ratio is 213.70. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DYNAMATECH.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to DYNAMATECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check DYNAMATECH.BO's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs DYNAMATECH.NS Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, DYNAMATECH.NS has a market cap of 69.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while DYNAMATECH.NS trades at ₹10,193.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas DYNAMATECH.NS's P/E ratio is 213.56. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DYNAMATECH.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to DYNAMATECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check DYNAMATECH.NS's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs SJS.NS Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, SJS.NS has a market cap of 68.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while SJS.NS trades at ₹2,138.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas SJS.NS's P/E ratio is 39.53. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SJS.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is more volatile compared to SJS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check SJS.NS's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs SJS.BO Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, SJS.BO has a market cap of 68.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while SJS.BO trades at ₹2,142.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas SJS.BO's P/E ratio is 40.15. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SJS.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is more volatile compared to SJS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check SJS.BO's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs SUPRAJIT.NS Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, SUPRAJIT.NS has a market cap of 64.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while SUPRAJIT.NS trades at ₹468.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas SUPRAJIT.NS's P/E ratio is 36.59. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SUPRAJIT.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is more volatile compared to SUPRAJIT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check SUPRAJIT.NS's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs SUPRAJIT.BO Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, SUPRAJIT.BO has a market cap of 64.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while SUPRAJIT.BO trades at ₹467.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas SUPRAJIT.BO's P/E ratio is 33.62. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SUPRAJIT.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is more volatile compared to SUPRAJIT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check SUPRAJIT.BO's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs FIEMIND.NS Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, FIEMIND.NS has a market cap of 58.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while FIEMIND.NS trades at ₹2,232.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas FIEMIND.NS's P/E ratio is 23.52. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FIEMIND.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is more volatile compared to FIEMIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check FIEMIND.NS's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs FIEMIND.BO Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, FIEMIND.BO has a market cap of 58.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while FIEMIND.BO trades at ₹2,221.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas FIEMIND.BO's P/E ratio is 22.91. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FIEMIND.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is more volatile compared to FIEMIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check FIEMIND.BO's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs SUBROS.NS Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, SUBROS.NS has a market cap of 54.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while SUBROS.NS trades at ₹834.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas SUBROS.NS's P/E ratio is 30.30. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SUBROS.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to SUBROS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check SUBROS.NS's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs SUBROS.BO Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, SUBROS.BO has a market cap of 54.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while SUBROS.BO trades at ₹836.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas SUBROS.BO's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SUBROS.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to SUBROS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check SUBROS.BO's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs JAMNAAUTO.NS Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, JAMNAAUTO.NS has a market cap of 52.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while JAMNAAUTO.NS trades at ₹130.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas JAMNAAUTO.NS's P/E ratio is 21.81. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JAMNAAUTO.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is more volatile compared to JAMNAAUTO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check JAMNAAUTO.NS's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs JAMNAAUTO.BO Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, JAMNAAUTO.BO has a market cap of 52.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while JAMNAAUTO.BO trades at ₹130.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas JAMNAAUTO.BO's P/E ratio is 22.35. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JAMNAAUTO.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is more volatile compared to JAMNAAUTO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check JAMNAAUTO.BO's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs LGBBROSLTD.NS Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, LGBBROSLTD.NS has a market cap of 51.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while LGBBROSLTD.NS trades at ₹1,602.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas LGBBROSLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 16.12. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LGBBROSLTD.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is more volatile compared to LGBBROSLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check LGBBROSLTD.NS's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs LGBBROSLTD.BO Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, LGBBROSLTD.BO has a market cap of 50.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while LGBBROSLTD.BO trades at ₹1,575.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas LGBBROSLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 15.40. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LGBBROSLTD.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to LGBBROSLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check LGBBROSLTD.BO's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs LUMAXIND.BO Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, LUMAXIND.BO has a market cap of 50B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while LUMAXIND.BO trades at ₹5,327.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas LUMAXIND.BO's P/E ratio is 26.30. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LUMAXIND.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to LUMAXIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check LUMAXIND.BO's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs LUMAXIND.NS Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, LUMAXIND.NS has a market cap of 49.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while LUMAXIND.NS trades at ₹5,290.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas LUMAXIND.NS's P/E ratio is 25.09. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LUMAXIND.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to LUMAXIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check LUMAXIND.NS's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs SWARAJENG.NS Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, SWARAJENG.NS has a market cap of 48.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while SWARAJENG.NS trades at ₹3,957.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas SWARAJENG.NS's P/E ratio is 27.62. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SWARAJENG.NS's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is more volatile compared to SWARAJENG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check SWARAJENG.NS's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs SWARAJENG.BO Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, SWARAJENG.BO has a market cap of 47.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while SWARAJENG.BO trades at ₹3,940.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas SWARAJENG.BO's P/E ratio is 24.38. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SWARAJENG.BO's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is more volatile compared to SWARAJENG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check SWARAJENG.BO's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs SHARDAMOTR.NS Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, SHARDAMOTR.NS has a market cap of 47.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while SHARDAMOTR.NS trades at ₹829.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas SHARDAMOTR.NS's P/E ratio is 11.34. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SHARDAMOTR.NS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to SHARDAMOTR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check SHARDAMOTR.NS's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs SHARDAMOTR.BO Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, SHARDAMOTR.BO has a market cap of 47.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while SHARDAMOTR.BO trades at ₹828.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas SHARDAMOTR.BO's P/E ratio is 9.01. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SHARDAMOTR.BO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to SHARDAMOTR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check SHARDAMOTR.BO's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs NRBBEARING.BO Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, NRBBEARING.BO has a market cap of 41.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while NRBBEARING.BO trades at ₹431.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas NRBBEARING.BO's P/E ratio is 30.14. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NRBBEARING.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is more volatile compared to NRBBEARING.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check NRBBEARING.BO's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs NRBBEARING.NS Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, NRBBEARING.NS has a market cap of 41.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while NRBBEARING.NS trades at ₹431.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas NRBBEARING.NS's P/E ratio is 30.20. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NRBBEARING.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is more volatile compared to NRBBEARING.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check NRBBEARING.NS's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs SANDHAR.NS Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, SANDHAR.NS has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while SANDHAR.NS trades at ₹682.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas SANDHAR.NS's P/E ratio is 20.39. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SANDHAR.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to SANDHAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check SANDHAR.NS's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs SANDHAR.BO Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, SANDHAR.BO has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while SANDHAR.BO trades at ₹680.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas SANDHAR.BO's P/E ratio is 20.33. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SANDHAR.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to SANDHAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check SANDHAR.BO's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs WHEELS.NS Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, WHEELS.NS has a market cap of 41B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while WHEELS.NS trades at ₹1,680.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas WHEELS.NS's P/E ratio is 25.08. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WHEELS.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to WHEELS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check WHEELS.NS's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs WHEELS.BO Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, WHEELS.BO has a market cap of 40.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while WHEELS.BO trades at ₹1,675.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas WHEELS.BO's P/E ratio is 26.40. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WHEELS.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to WHEELS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check WHEELS.BO's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs JTEKTINDIA.BO Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, JTEKTINDIA.BO has a market cap of 37.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while JTEKTINDIA.BO trades at ₹135.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas JTEKTINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 43.67. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JTEKTINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to JTEKTINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check JTEKTINDIA.BO's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs JTEKTINDIA.NS Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, JTEKTINDIA.NS has a market cap of 37.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while JTEKTINDIA.NS trades at ₹135.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas JTEKTINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 41.32. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JTEKTINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to JTEKTINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check JTEKTINDIA.NS's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs SSWL.NS Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, SSWL.NS has a market cap of 36.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while SSWL.NS trades at ₹230.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas SSWL.NS's P/E ratio is 16.66. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SSWL.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to SSWL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check SSWL.NS's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs SSWL.BO Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, SSWL.BO has a market cap of 36.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while SSWL.BO trades at ₹230.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas SSWL.BO's P/E ratio is 18.68. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SSWL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to SSWL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check SSWL.BO's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs TVSSRICHAK.NS Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, TVSSRICHAK.NS has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while TVSSRICHAK.NS trades at ₹4,155.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas TVSSRICHAK.NS's P/E ratio is 39.92. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TVSSRICHAK.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is more volatile compared to TVSSRICHAK.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check TVSSRICHAK.NS's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs TVSSRICHAK.BO Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, TVSSRICHAK.BO has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while TVSSRICHAK.BO trades at ₹4,143.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas TVSSRICHAK.BO's P/E ratio is 37.42. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TVSSRICHAK.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to TVSSRICHAK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check TVSSRICHAK.BO's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs CARRARO.NS Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, CARRARO.NS has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while CARRARO.NS trades at ₹558.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas CARRARO.NS's P/E ratio is 24.32. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CARRARO.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to CARRARO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check CARRARO.NS's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs RML.NS Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, RML.NS has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while RML.NS trades at ₹1,040.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas RML.NS's P/E ratio is 28.63. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RML.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to RML.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check RML.NS's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs RML.BO Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, RML.BO has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while RML.BO trades at ₹1,040.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas RML.BO's P/E ratio is 26.75. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RML.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to RML.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check RML.BO's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs AUTOAXLES.NS Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, AUTOAXLES.NS has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while AUTOAXLES.NS trades at ₹1,788.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas AUTOAXLES.NS's P/E ratio is 15.32. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AUTOAXLES.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to AUTOAXLES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check AUTOAXLES.NS's competition here
ZFCVINDIA.NS vs AUTOAXLES.BO Comparison July 2026
ZFCVINDIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZFCVINDIA.NS stands at 296.9B. In comparison, AUTOAXLES.BO has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, ZFCVINDIA.NS is priced at ₹2,609.00, while AUTOAXLES.BO trades at ₹1,771.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZFCVINDIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.62, whereas AUTOAXLES.BO's P/E ratio is 15.17. In terms of profitability, ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AUTOAXLES.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ZFCVINDIA.NS is less volatile compared to AUTOAXLES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZFCVINDIA.NS.Check AUTOAXLES.BO's competition here