MRF Limited
MRF Limited (MRF.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MRF.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRF.NS | ₹127,040.00 | -1.26% | 539.3B | 22.24 | ₹5,718.00 | +0.18% |
| MOTHERSON.NS | ₹142.41 | +4.78% | 1.4T | 37.11 | ₹3.66 | +0.43% |
| MOTHERSON.BO | ₹142.25 | +4.63% | 1.4T | 37.19 | ₹3.65 | +0.43% |
| BOSCHLTD.BO | ₹36,025.20 | -0.82% | 1.1T | 39.40 | ₹910.02 | +1.43% |
| BOSCHLTD.NS | ₹36,035.00 | -0.76% | 1.1T | 38.07 | ₹941.30 | +1.43% |
| BHARATFORG.BO | ₹1,938.70 | +1.16% | 924.3B | 85.51 | ₹22.61 | +0.41% |
| BHARATFORG.NS | ₹1,938.60 | +1.06% | 922.9B | 85.49 | ₹22.58 | +0.41% |
| SCHAEFFLER.NS | ₹4,157.70 | +1.34% | 655.9B | 54.12 | ₹77.54 | +0.83% |
| SCHAEFFLER.BO | ₹4,154.25 | +1.34% | 655B | 53.80 | ₹77.89 | +0.83% |
| UNOMINDA.NS | ₹1,130.80 | +1.10% | 643.8B | 53.86 | ₹20.70 | +0.22% |
Stock Comparison
MRF.NS vs MOTHERSON.NS Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, MOTHERSON.NS has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while MOTHERSON.NS trades at ₹142.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas MOTHERSON.NS's P/E ratio is 37.11. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MOTHERSON.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to MOTHERSON.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check MOTHERSON.NS's competition here
MRF.NS vs MOTHERSON.BO Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, MOTHERSON.BO has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while MOTHERSON.BO trades at ₹142.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas MOTHERSON.BO's P/E ratio is 37.19. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MOTHERSON.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to MOTHERSON.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check MOTHERSON.BO's competition here
MRF.NS vs BOSCHLTD.BO Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, BOSCHLTD.BO has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while BOSCHLTD.BO trades at ₹36,025.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas BOSCHLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 39.40. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BOSCHLTD.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to BOSCHLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check BOSCHLTD.BO's competition here
MRF.NS vs BOSCHLTD.NS Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, BOSCHLTD.NS has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while BOSCHLTD.NS trades at ₹36,035.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas BOSCHLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 38.07. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BOSCHLTD.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to BOSCHLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check BOSCHLTD.NS's competition here
MRF.NS vs BHARATFORG.BO Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, BHARATFORG.BO has a market cap of 924.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while BHARATFORG.BO trades at ₹1,938.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas BHARATFORG.BO's P/E ratio is 85.51. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BHARATFORG.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to BHARATFORG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check BHARATFORG.BO's competition here
MRF.NS vs BHARATFORG.NS Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, BHARATFORG.NS has a market cap of 922.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while BHARATFORG.NS trades at ₹1,938.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas BHARATFORG.NS's P/E ratio is 85.49. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BHARATFORG.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to BHARATFORG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check BHARATFORG.NS's competition here
MRF.NS vs SCHAEFFLER.NS Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, SCHAEFFLER.NS has a market cap of 655.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while SCHAEFFLER.NS trades at ₹4,157.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas SCHAEFFLER.NS's P/E ratio is 54.12. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SCHAEFFLER.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to SCHAEFFLER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check SCHAEFFLER.NS's competition here
MRF.NS vs SCHAEFFLER.BO Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, SCHAEFFLER.BO has a market cap of 655B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while SCHAEFFLER.BO trades at ₹4,154.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas SCHAEFFLER.BO's P/E ratio is 53.80. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SCHAEFFLER.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to SCHAEFFLER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check SCHAEFFLER.BO's competition here
MRF.NS vs UNOMINDA.NS Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, UNOMINDA.NS has a market cap of 643.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while UNOMINDA.NS trades at ₹1,130.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas UNOMINDA.NS's P/E ratio is 53.86. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to UNOMINDA.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to UNOMINDA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check UNOMINDA.NS's competition here
MRF.NS vs UNOMINDA.BO Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, UNOMINDA.BO has a market cap of 643.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while UNOMINDA.BO trades at ₹1,130.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas UNOMINDA.BO's P/E ratio is 53.57. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to UNOMINDA.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to UNOMINDA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check UNOMINDA.BO's competition here
MRF.NS vs MRF.BO Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, MRF.BO has a market cap of 539.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while MRF.BO trades at ₹127,031.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas MRF.BO's P/E ratio is 29.12. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MRF.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to MRF.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check MRF.BO's competition here
MRF.NS vs BALKRISIND.NS Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, BALKRISIND.NS has a market cap of 425.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while BALKRISIND.NS trades at ₹2,194.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas BALKRISIND.NS's P/E ratio is 34.28. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BALKRISIND.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to BALKRISIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check BALKRISIND.NS's competition here
MRF.NS vs BALKRISIND.BO Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, BALKRISIND.BO has a market cap of 425.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while BALKRISIND.BO trades at ₹2,194.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas BALKRISIND.BO's P/E ratio is 32.46. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BALKRISIND.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to BALKRISIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check BALKRISIND.BO's competition here
MRF.NS vs ENDURANCE.BO Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, ENDURANCE.BO has a market cap of 384.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while ENDURANCE.BO trades at ₹2,748.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas ENDURANCE.BO's P/E ratio is 40.47. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ENDURANCE.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to ENDURANCE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check ENDURANCE.BO's competition here
MRF.NS vs ENDURANCE.NS Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, ENDURANCE.NS has a market cap of 384.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while ENDURANCE.NS trades at ₹2,749.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas ENDURANCE.NS's P/E ratio is 40.33. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ENDURANCE.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to ENDURANCE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check ENDURANCE.NS's competition here
MRF.NS vs SONACOMS.BO Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, SONACOMS.BO has a market cap of 378.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while SONACOMS.BO trades at ₹618.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas SONACOMS.BO's P/E ratio is 58.87. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SONACOMS.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to SONACOMS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check SONACOMS.BO's competition here
MRF.NS vs SONACOMS.NS Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, SONACOMS.NS has a market cap of 378.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while SONACOMS.NS trades at ₹618.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas SONACOMS.NS's P/E ratio is 59.20. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SONACOMS.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to SONACOMS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check SONACOMS.NS's competition here
MRF.NS vs EXIDEIND.BO Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, EXIDEIND.BO has a market cap of 311.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while EXIDEIND.BO trades at ₹394.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas EXIDEIND.BO's P/E ratio is 37.60. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EXIDEIND.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to EXIDEIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check EXIDEIND.BO's competition here
MRF.NS vs EXIDEIND.NS Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, EXIDEIND.NS has a market cap of 311.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while EXIDEIND.NS trades at ₹394.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas EXIDEIND.NS's P/E ratio is 36.41. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EXIDEIND.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to EXIDEIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check EXIDEIND.NS's competition here
MRF.NS vs ZFCVINDIA.NS Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, ZFCVINDIA.NS has a market cap of 282.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while ZFCVINDIA.NS trades at ₹14,868.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas ZFCVINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 54.64. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to ZFCVINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check ZFCVINDIA.NS's competition here
MRF.NS vs ZFCVINDIA.BO Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, ZFCVINDIA.BO has a market cap of 281.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while ZFCVINDIA.BO trades at ₹14,854.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas ZFCVINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 54.60. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ZFCVINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to ZFCVINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check ZFCVINDIA.BO's competition here
MRF.NS vs TVSHLTD.BO Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, TVSHLTD.BO has a market cap of 274.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while TVSHLTD.BO trades at ₹13,491.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas TVSHLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 16.22. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TVSHLTD.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to TVSHLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check TVSHLTD.BO's competition here
MRF.NS vs TVSHLTD.NS Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, TVSHLTD.NS has a market cap of 274.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while TVSHLTD.NS trades at ₹13,483.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas TVSHLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 16.17. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TVSHLTD.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to TVSHLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check TVSHLTD.NS's competition here
MRF.NS vs MSUMI.BO Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, MSUMI.BO has a market cap of 260.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while MSUMI.BO trades at ₹39.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas MSUMI.BO's P/E ratio is 41.78. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MSUMI.BO's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to MSUMI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check MSUMI.BO's competition here
MRF.NS vs MSUMI.NS Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, MSUMI.NS has a market cap of 260.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while MSUMI.NS trades at ₹39.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas MSUMI.NS's P/E ratio is 41.73. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MSUMI.NS's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to MSUMI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check MSUMI.NS's competition here
MRF.NS vs APOLLOTYRE.BO Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, APOLLOTYRE.BO has a market cap of 249.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while APOLLOTYRE.BO trades at ₹399.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas APOLLOTYRE.BO's P/E ratio is 26.95. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to APOLLOTYRE.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to APOLLOTYRE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check APOLLOTYRE.BO's competition here
MRF.NS vs APOLLOTYRE.NS Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, APOLLOTYRE.NS has a market cap of 249.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while APOLLOTYRE.NS trades at ₹399.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas APOLLOTYRE.NS's P/E ratio is 18.17. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to APOLLOTYRE.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to APOLLOTYRE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check APOLLOTYRE.NS's competition here
MRF.NS vs ASAHIINDIA.BO Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, ASAHIINDIA.BO has a market cap of 227.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while ASAHIINDIA.BO trades at ₹914.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas ASAHIINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 73.57. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ASAHIINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to ASAHIINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check ASAHIINDIA.BO's competition here
MRF.NS vs ASAHIINDIA.NS Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, ASAHIINDIA.NS has a market cap of 227.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while ASAHIINDIA.NS trades at ₹918.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas ASAHIINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 73.63. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ASAHIINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to ASAHIINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check ASAHIINDIA.NS's competition here
MRF.NS vs CRAFTSMAN.NS Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, CRAFTSMAN.NS has a market cap of 207.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while CRAFTSMAN.NS trades at ₹8,688.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas CRAFTSMAN.NS's P/E ratio is 54.04. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CRAFTSMAN.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to CRAFTSMAN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check CRAFTSMAN.NS's competition here
MRF.NS vs CRAFTSMAN.BO Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, CRAFTSMAN.BO has a market cap of 206.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while CRAFTSMAN.BO trades at ₹8,686.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas CRAFTSMAN.BO's P/E ratio is 53.67. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CRAFTSMAN.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to CRAFTSMAN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check CRAFTSMAN.BO's competition here
MRF.NS vs MAHINDCIE.NS Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, MAHINDCIE.NS has a market cap of 194.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while MAHINDCIE.NS trades at ₹512.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas MAHINDCIE.NS's P/E ratio is 30.59. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MAHINDCIE.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to MAHINDCIE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check MAHINDCIE.NS's competition here
MRF.NS vs BELRISE.BO Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, BELRISE.BO has a market cap of 193.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while BELRISE.BO trades at ₹218.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas BELRISE.BO's P/E ratio is 37.43. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BELRISE.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to BELRISE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check BELRISE.BO's competition here
MRF.NS vs BELRISE.NS Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, BELRISE.NS has a market cap of 193.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while BELRISE.NS trades at ₹218.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas BELRISE.NS's P/E ratio is 37.40. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BELRISE.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to BELRISE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check BELRISE.NS's competition here
MRF.NS vs SUNDRMFAST.BO Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, SUNDRMFAST.BO has a market cap of 182.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while SUNDRMFAST.BO trades at ₹871.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas SUNDRMFAST.BO's P/E ratio is 32.93. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SUNDRMFAST.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to SUNDRMFAST.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check SUNDRMFAST.BO's competition here
MRF.NS vs SUNDRMFAST.NS Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, SUNDRMFAST.NS has a market cap of 182.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while SUNDRMFAST.NS trades at ₹870.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas SUNDRMFAST.NS's P/E ratio is 30.87. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SUNDRMFAST.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to SUNDRMFAST.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check SUNDRMFAST.NS's competition here
MRF.NS vs CIEINDIA.BO Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, CIEINDIA.BO has a market cap of 173.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while CIEINDIA.BO trades at ₹457.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas CIEINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 20.05. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CIEINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to CIEINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check CIEINDIA.BO's competition here
MRF.NS vs CIEINDIA.NS Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, CIEINDIA.NS has a market cap of 173.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while CIEINDIA.NS trades at ₹457.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas CIEINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 20.07. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CIEINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to CIEINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check CIEINDIA.NS's competition here
MRF.NS vs GABRIEL.NS Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, GABRIEL.NS has a market cap of 157.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while GABRIEL.NS trades at ₹1,129.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas GABRIEL.NS's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GABRIEL.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to GABRIEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check GABRIEL.NS's competition here
MRF.NS vs GABRIEL.BO Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, GABRIEL.BO has a market cap of 157.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while GABRIEL.BO trades at ₹1,129.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas GABRIEL.BO's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GABRIEL.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to GABRIEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check GABRIEL.BO's competition here
MRF.NS vs MAHSCOOTER.NS Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, MAHSCOOTER.NS has a market cap of 151.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while MAHSCOOTER.NS trades at ₹13,084.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas MAHSCOOTER.NS's P/E ratio is 48.91. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MAHSCOOTER.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to MAHSCOOTER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check MAHSCOOTER.NS's competition here
MRF.NS vs MAHSCOOTER.BO Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, MAHSCOOTER.BO has a market cap of 151.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while MAHSCOOTER.BO trades at ₹13,033.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas MAHSCOOTER.BO's P/E ratio is 42.40. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MAHSCOOTER.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to MAHSCOOTER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check MAHSCOOTER.BO's competition here
MRF.NS vs JBMA.NS Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, JBMA.NS has a market cap of 151.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while JBMA.NS trades at ₹640.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas JBMA.NS's P/E ratio is 69.12. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JBMA.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to JBMA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check JBMA.NS's competition here
MRF.NS vs JBMA.BO Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, JBMA.BO has a market cap of 151.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while JBMA.BO trades at ₹641.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas JBMA.BO's P/E ratio is 197.22. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JBMA.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to JBMA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check JBMA.BO's competition here
MRF.NS vs SHRIPISTON.NS Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, SHRIPISTON.NS has a market cap of 145.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while SHRIPISTON.NS trades at ₹3,323.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas SHRIPISTON.NS's P/E ratio is 26.25. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SHRIPISTON.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to SHRIPISTON.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check SHRIPISTON.NS's competition here
MRF.NS vs MINDACORP.BO Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, MINDACORP.BO has a market cap of 140.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while MINDACORP.BO trades at ₹623.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas MINDACORP.BO's P/E ratio is 39.44. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MINDACORP.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to MINDACORP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check MINDACORP.BO's competition here
MRF.NS vs MINDACORP.NS Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, MINDACORP.NS has a market cap of 140B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while MINDACORP.NS trades at ₹623.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas MINDACORP.NS's P/E ratio is 39.51. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MINDACORP.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to MINDACORP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check MINDACORP.NS's competition here
MRF.NS vs CEATLTD.BO Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, CEATLTD.BO has a market cap of 133.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while CEATLTD.BO trades at ₹3,295.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas CEATLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 24.07. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CEATLTD.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to CEATLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check CEATLTD.BO's competition here
MRF.NS vs CEATLTD.NS Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, CEATLTD.NS has a market cap of 133.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while CEATLTD.NS trades at ₹3,295.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas CEATLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 19.07. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CEATLTD.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to CEATLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check CEATLTD.NS's competition here
MRF.NS vs JKTYRE.NS Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, JKTYRE.NS has a market cap of 113.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while JKTYRE.NS trades at ₹413.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas JKTYRE.NS's P/E ratio is 15.98. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JKTYRE.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to JKTYRE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check JKTYRE.NS's competition here
MRF.NS vs JKTYRE.BO Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, JKTYRE.BO has a market cap of 113.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while JKTYRE.BO trades at ₹412.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas JKTYRE.BO's P/E ratio is 20.15. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JKTYRE.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to JKTYRE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check JKTYRE.BO's competition here
MRF.NS vs LUMAXTECH.NS Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, LUMAXTECH.NS has a market cap of 110.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while LUMAXTECH.NS trades at ₹1,668.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas LUMAXTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 45.23. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LUMAXTECH.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to LUMAXTECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check LUMAXTECH.NS's competition here
MRF.NS vs LUMAXTECH.BO Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, LUMAXTECH.BO has a market cap of 110.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while LUMAXTECH.BO trades at ₹1,667.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas LUMAXTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 52.06. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LUMAXTECH.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to LUMAXTECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check LUMAXTECH.BO's competition here
MRF.NS vs SUNCLAYLTD.NS Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, SUNCLAYLTD.NS has a market cap of 109.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while SUNCLAYLTD.NS trades at ₹5,426.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas SUNCLAYLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 16.90. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SUNCLAYLTD.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to SUNCLAYLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check SUNCLAYLTD.NS's competition here
MRF.NS vs BANCOINDIA.NS Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, BANCOINDIA.NS has a market cap of 89.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while BANCOINDIA.NS trades at ₹625.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas BANCOINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 18.25. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BANCOINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to BANCOINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check BANCOINDIA.NS's competition here
MRF.NS vs BANCOINDIA.BO Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, BANCOINDIA.BO has a market cap of 89B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while BANCOINDIA.BO trades at ₹627.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas BANCOINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 39.42. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BANCOINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to BANCOINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check BANCOINDIA.BO's competition here
MRF.NS vs ASKAUTOLTD.NS Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, ASKAUTOLTD.NS has a market cap of 87.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while ASKAUTOLTD.NS trades at ₹459.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas ASKAUTOLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 29.62. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ASKAUTOLTD.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to ASKAUTOLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check ASKAUTOLTD.NS's competition here
MRF.NS vs ASKAUTOLTD.BO Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, ASKAUTOLTD.BO has a market cap of 87.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while ASKAUTOLTD.BO trades at ₹460.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas ASKAUTOLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 29.60. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ASKAUTOLTD.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to ASKAUTOLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check ASKAUTOLTD.BO's competition here
MRF.NS vs VARROC.NS Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, VARROC.NS has a market cap of 87.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while VARROC.NS trades at ₹587.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas VARROC.NS's P/E ratio is 49.89. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VARROC.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to VARROC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check VARROC.NS's competition here
MRF.NS vs VARROC.BO Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, VARROC.BO has a market cap of 87.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while VARROC.BO trades at ₹587.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas VARROC.BO's P/E ratio is 49.66. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VARROC.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to VARROC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check VARROC.BO's competition here
MRF.NS vs DYNAMATECH.BO Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, DYNAMATECH.BO has a market cap of 74.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while DYNAMATECH.BO trades at ₹10,664.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas DYNAMATECH.BO's P/E ratio is 231.86. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DYNAMATECH.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to DYNAMATECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check DYNAMATECH.BO's competition here
MRF.NS vs DYNAMATECH.NS Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, DYNAMATECH.NS has a market cap of 74.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while DYNAMATECH.NS trades at ₹10,668.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas DYNAMATECH.NS's P/E ratio is 231.99. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DYNAMATECH.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to DYNAMATECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check DYNAMATECH.NS's competition here
MRF.NS vs BENGALASM.BO Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, BENGALASM.BO has a market cap of 73.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while BENGALASM.BO trades at ₹6,729.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas BENGALASM.BO's P/E ratio is 9.73. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BENGALASM.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to BENGALASM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check BENGALASM.BO's competition here
MRF.NS vs PRICOLLTD.NS Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, PRICOLLTD.NS has a market cap of 68.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while PRICOLLTD.NS trades at ₹558.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas PRICOLLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 27.29. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PRICOLLTD.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to PRICOLLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check PRICOLLTD.NS's competition here
MRF.NS vs PRICOLLTD.BO Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, PRICOLLTD.BO has a market cap of 68.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while PRICOLLTD.BO trades at ₹558.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas PRICOLLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 27.28. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PRICOLLTD.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to PRICOLLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check PRICOLLTD.BO's competition here
MRF.NS vs SJS.BO Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, SJS.BO has a market cap of 65.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while SJS.BO trades at ₹2,038.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas SJS.BO's P/E ratio is 39.88. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SJS.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to SJS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check SJS.BO's competition here
MRF.NS vs SJS.NS Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, SJS.NS has a market cap of 65.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while SJS.NS trades at ₹2,038.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas SJS.NS's P/E ratio is 39.90. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SJS.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to SJS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check SJS.NS's competition here
MRF.NS vs SUPRAJIT.NS Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, SUPRAJIT.NS has a market cap of 65B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while SUPRAJIT.NS trades at ₹474.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas SUPRAJIT.NS's P/E ratio is 46.89. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SUPRAJIT.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to SUPRAJIT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check SUPRAJIT.NS's competition here
MRF.NS vs SUPRAJIT.BO Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, SUPRAJIT.BO has a market cap of 64.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while SUPRAJIT.BO trades at ₹474.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas SUPRAJIT.BO's P/E ratio is 40.72. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SUPRAJIT.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to SUPRAJIT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check SUPRAJIT.BO's competition here
MRF.NS vs FIEMIND.BO Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, FIEMIND.BO has a market cap of 59.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while FIEMIND.BO trades at ₹2,315.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas FIEMIND.BO's P/E ratio is 26.11. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FIEMIND.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to FIEMIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check FIEMIND.BO's competition here
MRF.NS vs FIEMIND.NS Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, FIEMIND.NS has a market cap of 59.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while FIEMIND.NS trades at ₹2,315.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas FIEMIND.NS's P/E ratio is 24.35. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FIEMIND.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to FIEMIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check FIEMIND.NS's competition here
MRF.NS vs LUMAXIND.NS Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, LUMAXIND.NS has a market cap of 54.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while LUMAXIND.NS trades at ₹5,978.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas LUMAXIND.NS's P/E ratio is 33.66. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LUMAXIND.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to LUMAXIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check LUMAXIND.NS's competition here
MRF.NS vs LUMAXIND.BO Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, LUMAXIND.BO has a market cap of 54.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while LUMAXIND.BO trades at ₹5,975.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas LUMAXIND.BO's P/E ratio is 33.68. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LUMAXIND.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to LUMAXIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check LUMAXIND.BO's competition here
MRF.NS vs JAMNAAUTO.BO Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, JAMNAAUTO.BO has a market cap of 49.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while JAMNAAUTO.BO trades at ₹123.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas JAMNAAUTO.BO's P/E ratio is 25.53. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JAMNAAUTO.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to JAMNAAUTO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check JAMNAAUTO.BO's competition here
MRF.NS vs JAMNAAUTO.NS Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, JAMNAAUTO.NS has a market cap of 49.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while JAMNAAUTO.NS trades at ₹123.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas JAMNAAUTO.NS's P/E ratio is 25.49. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JAMNAAUTO.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to JAMNAAUTO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check JAMNAAUTO.NS's competition here
MRF.NS vs LGBBROSLTD.NS Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, LGBBROSLTD.NS has a market cap of 49.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while LGBBROSLTD.NS trades at ₹1,545.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas LGBBROSLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 15.48. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LGBBROSLTD.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to LGBBROSLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check LGBBROSLTD.NS's competition here
MRF.NS vs LGBBROSLTD.BO Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, LGBBROSLTD.BO has a market cap of 49.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while LGBBROSLTD.BO trades at ₹1,543.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas LGBBROSLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 15.30. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LGBBROSLTD.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to LGBBROSLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check LGBBROSLTD.BO's competition here
MRF.NS vs SHARDAMOTR.NS Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, SHARDAMOTR.NS has a market cap of 48.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while SHARDAMOTR.NS trades at ₹844.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas SHARDAMOTR.NS's P/E ratio is 14.45. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SHARDAMOTR.NS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to SHARDAMOTR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check SHARDAMOTR.NS's competition here
MRF.NS vs SHARDAMOTR.BO Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, SHARDAMOTR.BO has a market cap of 48.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while SHARDAMOTR.BO trades at ₹846.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas SHARDAMOTR.BO's P/E ratio is 14.42. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SHARDAMOTR.BO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to SHARDAMOTR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check SHARDAMOTR.BO's competition here
MRF.NS vs SUBROS.BO Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, SUBROS.BO has a market cap of 47.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while SUBROS.BO trades at ₹737.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas SUBROS.BO's P/E ratio is 28.56. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SUBROS.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to SUBROS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check SUBROS.BO's competition here
MRF.NS vs SUBROS.NS Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, SUBROS.NS has a market cap of 47.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while SUBROS.NS trades at ₹736.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas SUBROS.NS's P/E ratio is 28.48. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SUBROS.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to SUBROS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check SUBROS.NS's competition here
MRF.NS vs SWARAJENG.BO Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, SWARAJENG.BO has a market cap of 45.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while SWARAJENG.BO trades at ₹3,777.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas SWARAJENG.BO's P/E ratio is 24.43. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SWARAJENG.BO's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to SWARAJENG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check SWARAJENG.BO's competition here
MRF.NS vs SWARAJENG.NS Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, SWARAJENG.NS has a market cap of 45.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while SWARAJENG.NS trades at ₹3,773.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas SWARAJENG.NS's P/E ratio is 23.28. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SWARAJENG.NS's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to SWARAJENG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check SWARAJENG.NS's competition here
MRF.NS vs SANDHAR.BO Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, SANDHAR.BO has a market cap of 41.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while SANDHAR.BO trades at ₹710.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas SANDHAR.BO's P/E ratio is 23.44. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SANDHAR.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to SANDHAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check SANDHAR.BO's competition here
MRF.NS vs SANDHAR.NS Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, SANDHAR.NS has a market cap of 41.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while SANDHAR.NS trades at ₹710.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas SANDHAR.NS's P/E ratio is 23.44. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SANDHAR.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to SANDHAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check SANDHAR.NS's competition here
MRF.NS vs WHEELS.BO Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, WHEELS.BO has a market cap of 39.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while WHEELS.BO trades at ₹1,655.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas WHEELS.BO's P/E ratio is 25.37. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WHEELS.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to WHEELS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check WHEELS.BO's competition here
MRF.NS vs WHEELS.NS Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, WHEELS.NS has a market cap of 39.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while WHEELS.NS trades at ₹1,654.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas WHEELS.NS's P/E ratio is 25.24. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WHEELS.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to WHEELS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check WHEELS.NS's competition here
MRF.NS vs NRBBEARING.BO Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, NRBBEARING.BO has a market cap of 37.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while NRBBEARING.BO trades at ₹382.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas NRBBEARING.BO's P/E ratio is 40.53. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NRBBEARING.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to NRBBEARING.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check NRBBEARING.BO's competition here
MRF.NS vs NRBBEARING.NS Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, NRBBEARING.NS has a market cap of 37.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while NRBBEARING.NS trades at ₹381.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas NRBBEARING.NS's P/E ratio is 26.11. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NRBBEARING.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to NRBBEARING.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check NRBBEARING.NS's competition here
MRF.NS vs JTEKTINDIA.BO Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, JTEKTINDIA.BO has a market cap of 35B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while JTEKTINDIA.BO trades at ₹131.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas JTEKTINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 44.37. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JTEKTINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to JTEKTINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check JTEKTINDIA.BO's competition here
MRF.NS vs JTEKTINDIA.NS Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, JTEKTINDIA.NS has a market cap of 34.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while JTEKTINDIA.NS trades at ₹132.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas JTEKTINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 44.34. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JTEKTINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to JTEKTINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check JTEKTINDIA.NS's competition here
MRF.NS vs CARRARO.NS Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, CARRARO.NS has a market cap of 34.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while CARRARO.NS trades at ₹555.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas CARRARO.NS's P/E ratio is 30.76. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CARRARO.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to CARRARO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check CARRARO.NS's competition here
MRF.NS vs SSWL.BO Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, SSWL.BO has a market cap of 33.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while SSWL.BO trades at ₹209.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas SSWL.BO's P/E ratio is 17.58. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SSWL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to SSWL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check SSWL.BO's competition here
MRF.NS vs SSWL.NS Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, SSWL.NS has a market cap of 33.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while SSWL.NS trades at ₹209.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas SSWL.NS's P/E ratio is 17.58. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SSWL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to SSWL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check SSWL.NS's competition here
MRF.NS vs TVSSRICHAK.BO Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, TVSSRICHAK.BO has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while TVSSRICHAK.BO trades at ₹4,028.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas TVSSRICHAK.BO's P/E ratio is 61.81. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TVSSRICHAK.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to TVSSRICHAK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check TVSSRICHAK.BO's competition here
MRF.NS vs TVSSRICHAK.NS Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, TVSSRICHAK.NS has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while TVSSRICHAK.NS trades at ₹4,030.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas TVSSRICHAK.NS's P/E ratio is 61.42. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TVSSRICHAK.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to TVSSRICHAK.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check TVSSRICHAK.NS's competition here
MRF.NS vs AUTOAXLES.BO Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, AUTOAXLES.BO has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while AUTOAXLES.BO trades at ₹1,772.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas AUTOAXLES.BO's P/E ratio is 16.53. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AUTOAXLES.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to AUTOAXLES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check AUTOAXLES.BO's competition here
MRF.NS vs AUTOAXLES.NS Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, AUTOAXLES.NS has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while AUTOAXLES.NS trades at ₹1,772.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas AUTOAXLES.NS's P/E ratio is 16.50. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AUTOAXLES.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to AUTOAXLES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check AUTOAXLES.NS's competition here
MRF.NS vs RML.BO Comparison May 2026
MRF.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRF.NS stands at 539.3B. In comparison, RML.BO has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MRF.NS is priced at ₹127,040.00, while RML.BO trades at ₹929.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.24, whereas RML.BO's P/E ratio is 33.16. In terms of profitability, MRF.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RML.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MRF.NS is less volatile compared to RML.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRF.NS.Check RML.BO's competition here