Federal-Mogul Goetze (India) Limited

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, MOTHERSON.BO has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while MOTHERSON.BO trades at ₹132.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas MOTHERSON.BO's P/E ratio is 40.96. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MOTHERSON.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to MOTHERSON.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check MOTHERSON.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, MOTHERSON.NS has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while MOTHERSON.NS trades at ₹135.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas MOTHERSON.NS's P/E ratio is 40.92. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MOTHERSON.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is more volatile compared to MOTHERSON.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check MOTHERSON.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, BOSCHLTD.NS has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while BOSCHLTD.NS trades at ₹37,250.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas BOSCHLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 39.36. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BOSCHLTD.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is more volatile compared to BOSCHLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check BOSCHLTD.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, BOSCHLTD.BO has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while BOSCHLTD.BO trades at ₹36,820.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas BOSCHLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 40.46. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BOSCHLTD.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to BOSCHLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check BOSCHLTD.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, BHARATFORG.BO has a market cap of 902.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while BHARATFORG.BO trades at ₹1,888.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas BHARATFORG.BO's P/E ratio is 83.52. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BHARATFORG.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to BHARATFORG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check BHARATFORG.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, BHARATFORG.NS has a market cap of 902.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while BHARATFORG.NS trades at ₹1,908.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas BHARATFORG.NS's P/E ratio is 84.03. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BHARATFORG.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is more volatile compared to BHARATFORG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check BHARATFORG.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, SCHAEFFLER.NS has a market cap of 627.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while SCHAEFFLER.NS trades at ₹4,109.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas SCHAEFFLER.NS's P/E ratio is 51.63. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SCHAEFFLER.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is more volatile compared to SCHAEFFLER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check SCHAEFFLER.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, SCHAEFFLER.BO has a market cap of 625.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while SCHAEFFLER.BO trades at ₹4,002.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas SCHAEFFLER.BO's P/E ratio is 51.41. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SCHAEFFLER.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to SCHAEFFLER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check SCHAEFFLER.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, UNOMINDA.BO has a market cap of 610B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while UNOMINDA.BO trades at ₹1,056.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas UNOMINDA.BO's P/E ratio is 53.49. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to UNOMINDA.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to UNOMINDA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check UNOMINDA.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, UNOMINDA.NS has a market cap of 610B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while UNOMINDA.NS trades at ₹1,064.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas UNOMINDA.NS's P/E ratio is 50.98. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to UNOMINDA.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is more volatile compared to UNOMINDA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check UNOMINDA.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, MRF.NS has a market cap of 539.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while MRF.NS trades at ₹127,655.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas MRF.NS's P/E ratio is 22.24. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MRF.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is more volatile compared to MRF.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check MRF.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, MRF.BO has a market cap of 539B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while MRF.BO trades at ₹127,080.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas MRF.BO's P/E ratio is 29.11. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MRF.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to MRF.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check MRF.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, BALKRISIND.NS has a market cap of 416.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while BALKRISIND.NS trades at ₹2,178.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas BALKRISIND.NS's P/E ratio is 33.48. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BALKRISIND.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is more volatile compared to BALKRISIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check BALKRISIND.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, BALKRISIND.BO has a market cap of 416.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while BALKRISIND.BO trades at ₹2,153.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas BALKRISIND.BO's P/E ratio is 31.76. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BALKRISIND.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to BALKRISIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check BALKRISIND.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, SONACOMS.NS has a market cap of 366B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while SONACOMS.NS trades at ₹590.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas SONACOMS.NS's P/E ratio is 59.64. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SONACOMS.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is more volatile compared to SONACOMS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check SONACOMS.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, SONACOMS.BO has a market cap of 365.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while SONACOMS.BO trades at ₹588.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas SONACOMS.BO's P/E ratio is 59.57. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SONACOMS.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to SONACOMS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check SONACOMS.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, ENDURANCE.NS has a market cap of 359B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while ENDURANCE.NS trades at ₹2,580.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas ENDURANCE.NS's P/E ratio is 37.69. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ENDURANCE.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is more volatile compared to ENDURANCE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check ENDURANCE.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, ENDURANCE.BO has a market cap of 358.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while ENDURANCE.BO trades at ₹2,550.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas ENDURANCE.BO's P/E ratio is 37.67. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ENDURANCE.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is more volatile compared to ENDURANCE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check ENDURANCE.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, EXIDEIND.NS has a market cap of 288.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while EXIDEIND.NS trades at ₹343.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas EXIDEIND.NS's P/E ratio is 33.79. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EXIDEIND.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is more volatile compared to EXIDEIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check EXIDEIND.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, EXIDEIND.BO has a market cap of 288.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while EXIDEIND.BO trades at ₹339.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas EXIDEIND.BO's P/E ratio is 34.86. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EXIDEIND.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is more volatile compared to EXIDEIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check EXIDEIND.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, TVSHLTD.BO has a market cap of 274.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while TVSHLTD.BO trades at ₹13,584.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas TVSHLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 16.21. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TVSHLTD.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to TVSHLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check TVSHLTD.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, TVSHLTD.NS has a market cap of 274.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while TVSHLTD.NS trades at ₹13,441.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas TVSHLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 16.18. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TVSHLTD.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is more volatile compared to TVSHLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check TVSHLTD.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, ZFCVINDIA.NS has a market cap of 273.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while ZFCVINDIA.NS trades at ₹14,356.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas ZFCVINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 52.94. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is more volatile compared to ZFCVINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check ZFCVINDIA.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, ZFCVINDIA.BO has a market cap of 273.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while ZFCVINDIA.BO trades at ₹14,400.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas ZFCVINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 52.91. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ZFCVINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is more volatile compared to ZFCVINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check ZFCVINDIA.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, MSUMI.BO has a market cap of 263.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while MSUMI.BO trades at ₹39.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas MSUMI.BO's P/E ratio is 42.28. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MSUMI.BO's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to MSUMI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check MSUMI.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, MSUMI.NS has a market cap of 263.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while MSUMI.NS trades at ₹40.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas MSUMI.NS's P/E ratio is 42.26. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MSUMI.NS's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is more volatile compared to MSUMI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check MSUMI.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, APOLLOTYRE.BO has a market cap of 238.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while APOLLOTYRE.BO trades at ₹376.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas APOLLOTYRE.BO's P/E ratio is 25.75. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to APOLLOTYRE.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to APOLLOTYRE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check APOLLOTYRE.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, APOLLOTYRE.NS has a market cap of 238.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while APOLLOTYRE.NS trades at ₹377.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas APOLLOTYRE.NS's P/E ratio is 17.36. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to APOLLOTYRE.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is more volatile compared to APOLLOTYRE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check APOLLOTYRE.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, ASAHIINDIA.NS has a market cap of 211.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while ASAHIINDIA.NS trades at ₹840.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas ASAHIINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 68.23. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ASAHIINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is more volatile compared to ASAHIINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check ASAHIINDIA.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, ASAHIINDIA.BO has a market cap of 210.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while ASAHIINDIA.BO trades at ₹827.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas ASAHIINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 68.08. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ASAHIINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is more volatile compared to ASAHIINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check ASAHIINDIA.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, CRAFTSMAN.NS has a market cap of 204.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while CRAFTSMAN.NS trades at ₹8,580.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas CRAFTSMAN.NS's P/E ratio is 53.15. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CRAFTSMAN.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is more volatile compared to CRAFTSMAN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check CRAFTSMAN.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, CRAFTSMAN.BO has a market cap of 204.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while CRAFTSMAN.BO trades at ₹8,566.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas CRAFTSMAN.BO's P/E ratio is 53.14. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CRAFTSMAN.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to CRAFTSMAN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check CRAFTSMAN.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, MAHINDCIE.NS has a market cap of 194.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while MAHINDCIE.NS trades at ₹512.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas MAHINDCIE.NS's P/E ratio is 30.59. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MAHINDCIE.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to MAHINDCIE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check MAHINDCIE.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, BELRISE.NS has a market cap of 186.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while BELRISE.NS trades at ₹213.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas BELRISE.NS's P/E ratio is 39.18. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BELRISE.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is more volatile compared to BELRISE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check BELRISE.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, BELRISE.BO has a market cap of 186.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while BELRISE.BO trades at ₹209.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas BELRISE.BO's P/E ratio is 39.08. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BELRISE.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to BELRISE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check BELRISE.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, SUNDRMFAST.BO has a market cap of 175.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while SUNDRMFAST.BO trades at ₹835.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas SUNDRMFAST.BO's P/E ratio is 31.68. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SUNDRMFAST.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to SUNDRMFAST.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check SUNDRMFAST.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, CIEINDIA.NS has a market cap of 175.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while CIEINDIA.NS trades at ₹464.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas CIEINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 20.28. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CIEINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is more volatile compared to CIEINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check CIEINDIA.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, CIEINDIA.BO has a market cap of 175.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while CIEINDIA.BO trades at ₹462.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas CIEINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 20.27. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CIEINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to CIEINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check CIEINDIA.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, SUNDRMFAST.NS has a market cap of 175.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while SUNDRMFAST.NS trades at ₹839.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas SUNDRMFAST.NS's P/E ratio is 29.70. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SUNDRMFAST.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is more volatile compared to SUNDRMFAST.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check SUNDRMFAST.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, GABRIEL.NS has a market cap of 156.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while GABRIEL.NS trades at ₹1,104.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas GABRIEL.NS's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GABRIEL.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is more volatile compared to GABRIEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check GABRIEL.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, GABRIEL.BO has a market cap of 156.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while GABRIEL.BO trades at ₹1,088.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas GABRIEL.BO's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GABRIEL.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to GABRIEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check GABRIEL.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, JBMA.BO has a market cap of 152.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while JBMA.BO trades at ₹643.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas JBMA.BO's P/E ratio is 198.72. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JBMA.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to JBMA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check JBMA.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, JBMA.NS has a market cap of 152.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while JBMA.NS trades at ₹644.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas JBMA.NS's P/E ratio is 69.80. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JBMA.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is more volatile compared to JBMA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check JBMA.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, SHRIPISTON.NS has a market cap of 144.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while SHRIPISTON.NS trades at ₹3,310.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas SHRIPISTON.NS's P/E ratio is 26.16. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SHRIPISTON.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is more volatile compared to SHRIPISTON.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check SHRIPISTON.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, MAHSCOOTER.BO has a market cap of 131.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while MAHSCOOTER.BO trades at ₹11,510.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas MAHSCOOTER.BO's P/E ratio is 36.80. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MAHSCOOTER.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to MAHSCOOTER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check MAHSCOOTER.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, MAHSCOOTER.NS has a market cap of 131.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while MAHSCOOTER.NS trades at ₹11,530.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas MAHSCOOTER.NS's P/E ratio is 42.38. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MAHSCOOTER.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is more volatile compared to MAHSCOOTER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check MAHSCOOTER.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, CEATLTD.NS has a market cap of 128.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while CEATLTD.NS trades at ₹3,217.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas CEATLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 18.33. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CEATLTD.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is more volatile compared to CEATLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check CEATLTD.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, CEATLTD.BO has a market cap of 128.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while CEATLTD.BO trades at ₹3,165.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas CEATLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 23.10. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CEATLTD.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to CEATLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check CEATLTD.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, MINDACORP.BO has a market cap of 121.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while MINDACORP.BO trades at ₹517.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas MINDACORP.BO's P/E ratio is 42.95. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MINDACORP.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to MINDACORP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check MINDACORP.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, MINDACORP.NS has a market cap of 121.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while MINDACORP.NS trades at ₹518.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas MINDACORP.NS's P/E ratio is 43.01. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MINDACORP.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is more volatile compared to MINDACORP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check MINDACORP.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, LUMAXTECH.NS has a market cap of 112.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while LUMAXTECH.NS trades at ₹1,652.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas LUMAXTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 45.21. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LUMAXTECH.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is more volatile compared to LUMAXTECH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check LUMAXTECH.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, LUMAXTECH.BO has a market cap of 112.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while LUMAXTECH.BO trades at ₹1,646.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas LUMAXTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 52.96. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LUMAXTECH.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to LUMAXTECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check LUMAXTECH.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, SUNCLAYLTD.NS has a market cap of 109.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while SUNCLAYLTD.NS trades at ₹5,426.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas SUNCLAYLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 16.90. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SUNCLAYLTD.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to SUNCLAYLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check SUNCLAYLTD.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, JKTYRE.NS has a market cap of 104.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while JKTYRE.NS trades at ₹367.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas JKTYRE.NS's P/E ratio is 14.64. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JKTYRE.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is more volatile compared to JKTYRE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check JKTYRE.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, JKTYRE.BO has a market cap of 104B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while JKTYRE.BO trades at ₹360.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas JKTYRE.BO's P/E ratio is 18.45. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JKTYRE.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to JKTYRE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check JKTYRE.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, ASKAUTOLTD.BO has a market cap of 87.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while ASKAUTOLTD.BO trades at ₹445.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas ASKAUTOLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 29.53. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ASKAUTOLTD.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to ASKAUTOLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check ASKAUTOLTD.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, ASKAUTOLTD.NS has a market cap of 87.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while ASKAUTOLTD.NS trades at ₹447.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas ASKAUTOLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 29.46. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ASKAUTOLTD.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is more volatile compared to ASKAUTOLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check ASKAUTOLTD.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, VARROC.NS has a market cap of 85.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while VARROC.NS trades at ₹561.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas VARROC.NS's P/E ratio is 48.34. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VARROC.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is more volatile compared to VARROC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check VARROC.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, VARROC.BO has a market cap of 84.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while VARROC.BO trades at ₹555.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas VARROC.BO's P/E ratio is 48.09. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VARROC.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is more volatile compared to VARROC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check VARROC.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, BANCOINDIA.BO has a market cap of 84.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while BANCOINDIA.BO trades at ₹591.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas BANCOINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 37.44. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BANCOINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to BANCOINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check BANCOINDIA.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, BANCOINDIA.NS has a market cap of 84.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while BANCOINDIA.NS trades at ₹597.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas BANCOINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 17.34. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BANCOINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is more volatile compared to BANCOINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check BANCOINDIA.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, DYNAMATECH.BO has a market cap of 71B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while DYNAMATECH.BO trades at ₹10,447.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas DYNAMATECH.BO's P/E ratio is 196.90. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DYNAMATECH.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to DYNAMATECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check DYNAMATECH.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, DYNAMATECH.NS has a market cap of 70.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while DYNAMATECH.NS trades at ₹10,633.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas DYNAMATECH.NS's P/E ratio is 196.74. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DYNAMATECH.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is more volatile compared to DYNAMATECH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check DYNAMATECH.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, BENGALASM.BO has a market cap of 70.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while BENGALASM.BO trades at ₹6,200.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas BENGALASM.BO's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BENGALASM.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is more volatile compared to BENGALASM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check BENGALASM.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, PRICOLLTD.NS has a market cap of 65.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while PRICOLLTD.NS trades at ₹544.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas PRICOLLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 26.14. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PRICOLLTD.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is more volatile compared to PRICOLLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check PRICOLLTD.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, PRICOLLTD.BO has a market cap of 65.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while PRICOLLTD.BO trades at ₹538.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas PRICOLLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 26.18. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PRICOLLTD.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to PRICOLLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check PRICOLLTD.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, SJS.BO has a market cap of 63.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while SJS.BO trades at ₹1,973.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas SJS.BO's P/E ratio is 38.70. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SJS.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to SJS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check SJS.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, SJS.NS has a market cap of 62.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while SJS.NS trades at ₹1,967.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas SJS.NS's P/E ratio is 38.56. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SJS.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is more volatile compared to SJS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check SJS.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, SUPRAJIT.BO has a market cap of 57.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while SUPRAJIT.BO trades at ₹419.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas SUPRAJIT.BO's P/E ratio is 36.14. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SUPRAJIT.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to SUPRAJIT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check SUPRAJIT.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, SUPRAJIT.NS has a market cap of 57.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while SUPRAJIT.NS trades at ₹425.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas SUPRAJIT.NS's P/E ratio is 41.43. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SUPRAJIT.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is more volatile compared to SUPRAJIT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check SUPRAJIT.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, FIEMIND.NS has a market cap of 56.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while FIEMIND.NS trades at ₹2,168.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas FIEMIND.NS's P/E ratio is 23.24. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FIEMIND.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is more volatile compared to FIEMIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check FIEMIND.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, FIEMIND.BO has a market cap of 56.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while FIEMIND.BO trades at ₹2,146.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas FIEMIND.BO's P/E ratio is 24.89. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FIEMIND.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to FIEMIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check FIEMIND.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, SHARDAMOTR.BO has a market cap of 50.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while SHARDAMOTR.BO trades at ₹885.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas SHARDAMOTR.BO's P/E ratio is 15.08. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SHARDAMOTR.BO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to SHARDAMOTR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check SHARDAMOTR.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, SHARDAMOTR.NS has a market cap of 50.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while SHARDAMOTR.NS trades at ₹912.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas SHARDAMOTR.NS's P/E ratio is 15.05. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SHARDAMOTR.NS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is more volatile compared to SHARDAMOTR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check SHARDAMOTR.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, LUMAXIND.NS has a market cap of 50.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while LUMAXIND.NS trades at ₹5,554.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas LUMAXIND.NS's P/E ratio is 30.92. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LUMAXIND.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to LUMAXIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check LUMAXIND.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, LUMAXIND.BO has a market cap of 50.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while LUMAXIND.BO trades at ₹5,358.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas LUMAXIND.BO's P/E ratio is 30.87. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LUMAXIND.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to LUMAXIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check LUMAXIND.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, LGBBROSLTD.BO has a market cap of 49.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while LGBBROSLTD.BO trades at ₹1,546.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas LGBBROSLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 15.31. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LGBBROSLTD.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to LGBBROSLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check LGBBROSLTD.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, LGBBROSLTD.NS has a market cap of 49.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while LGBBROSLTD.NS trades at ₹1,554.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas LGBBROSLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 15.46. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LGBBROSLTD.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is more volatile compared to LGBBROSLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check LGBBROSLTD.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, SUBROS.BO has a market cap of 46.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while SUBROS.BO trades at ₹714.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas SUBROS.BO's P/E ratio is 28.68. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SUBROS.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to SUBROS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check SUBROS.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, SUBROS.NS has a market cap of 46.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while SUBROS.NS trades at ₹720.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas SUBROS.NS's P/E ratio is 28.68. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SUBROS.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is more volatile compared to SUBROS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check SUBROS.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, SWARAJENG.BO has a market cap of 44.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while SWARAJENG.BO trades at ₹3,698.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas SWARAJENG.BO's P/E ratio is 23.98. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SWARAJENG.BO's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is more volatile compared to SWARAJENG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check SWARAJENG.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, SWARAJENG.NS has a market cap of 44.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while SWARAJENG.NS trades at ₹3,735.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas SWARAJENG.NS's P/E ratio is 22.84. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SWARAJENG.NS's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is more volatile compared to SWARAJENG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check SWARAJENG.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, JAMNAAUTO.NS has a market cap of 44.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while JAMNAAUTO.NS trades at ₹113.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas JAMNAAUTO.NS's P/E ratio is 23.01. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JAMNAAUTO.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is more volatile compared to JAMNAAUTO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check JAMNAAUTO.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, JAMNAAUTO.BO has a market cap of 44.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while JAMNAAUTO.BO trades at ₹111.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas JAMNAAUTO.BO's P/E ratio is 23.01. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JAMNAAUTO.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to JAMNAAUTO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check JAMNAAUTO.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, WHEELS.NS has a market cap of 38.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while WHEELS.NS trades at ₹1,661.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas WHEELS.NS's P/E ratio is 28.27. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WHEELS.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to WHEELS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check WHEELS.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, WHEELS.BO has a market cap of 38.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while WHEELS.BO trades at ₹1,562.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas WHEELS.BO's P/E ratio is 28.23. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WHEELS.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to WHEELS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check WHEELS.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, JTEKTINDIA.NS has a market cap of 34.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while JTEKTINDIA.NS trades at ₹128.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas JTEKTINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 45.24. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JTEKTINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to JTEKTINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check JTEKTINDIA.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, JTEKTINDIA.BO has a market cap of 34.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while JTEKTINDIA.BO trades at ₹125.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas JTEKTINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 45.22. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JTEKTINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to JTEKTINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check JTEKTINDIA.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, NRBBEARING.BO has a market cap of 34.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while NRBBEARING.BO trades at ₹358.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas NRBBEARING.BO's P/E ratio is 37.73. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NRBBEARING.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to NRBBEARING.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check NRBBEARING.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, NRBBEARING.NS has a market cap of 34.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while NRBBEARING.NS trades at ₹359.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas NRBBEARING.NS's P/E ratio is 24.32. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NRBBEARING.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is more volatile compared to NRBBEARING.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check NRBBEARING.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, SSWL.NS has a market cap of 32.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while SSWL.NS trades at ₹210.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas SSWL.NS's P/E ratio is 17.26. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SSWL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is more volatile compared to SSWL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check SSWL.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, SSWL.BO has a market cap of 32.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while SSWL.BO trades at ₹207.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas SSWL.BO's P/E ratio is 17.28. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SSWL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is more volatile compared to SSWL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check SSWL.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, CARRARO.NS has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while CARRARO.NS trades at ₹573.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas CARRARO.NS's P/E ratio is 28.50. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CARRARO.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is more volatile compared to CARRARO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check CARRARO.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, SANDHAR.BO has a market cap of 32B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while SANDHAR.BO trades at ₹531.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas SANDHAR.BO's P/E ratio is 18.02. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SANDHAR.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to SANDHAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check SANDHAR.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, SANDHAR.NS has a market cap of 31.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while SANDHAR.NS trades at ₹533.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas SANDHAR.NS's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SANDHAR.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is more volatile compared to SANDHAR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check SANDHAR.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, TVSSRICHAK.NS has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while TVSSRICHAK.NS trades at ₹3,629.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas TVSSRICHAK.NS's P/E ratio is 61.42. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TVSSRICHAK.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is more volatile compared to TVSSRICHAK.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check TVSSRICHAK.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, TVSSRICHAK.BO has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while TVSSRICHAK.BO trades at ₹3,585.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas TVSSRICHAK.BO's P/E ratio is 61.48. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TVSSRICHAK.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to TVSSRICHAK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check TVSSRICHAK.BO's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, AUTOAXLES.NS has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while AUTOAXLES.NS trades at ₹1,781.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas AUTOAXLES.NS's P/E ratio is 16.95. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AUTOAXLES.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is more volatile compared to AUTOAXLES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check AUTOAXLES.NS's competition here

FMGOETZE.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FMGOETZE.BO stands at 25.2B. In comparison, AUTOAXLES.BO has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FMGOETZE.BO is priced at ₹453.00, while AUTOAXLES.BO trades at ₹1,750.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FMGOETZE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.93, whereas AUTOAXLES.BO's P/E ratio is 16.93. In terms of profitability, FMGOETZE.BO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AUTOAXLES.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FMGOETZE.BO is less volatile compared to AUTOAXLES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMGOETZE.BO.Check AUTOAXLES.BO's competition here