Carraro India Ltd.
Carraro India Ltd. (CARRARO.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CARRARO.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CARRARO.NS | ₹587.00 | +1.40% | 32.9B | 29.24 | ₹19.80 | +0.79% |
| MOTHERSON.NS | ₹129.88 | +8.02% | 1.3T | 39.45 | ₹3.23 | +0.46% |
| MOTHERSON.BO | ₹128.55 | +6.95% | 1.3T | 39.32 | ₹3.23 | +0.46% |
| BOSCHLTD.BO | ₹38,175.00 | +6.38% | 1.1T | 40.29 | ₹910.02 | +1.40% |
| BOSCHLTD.NS | ₹38,280.00 | +6.72% | 1.1T | 39.16 | ₹935.87 | +1.40% |
| BHARATFORG.BO | ₹1,879.75 | +0.77% | 896.1B | 82.89 | ₹22.61 | +0.43% |
| BHARATFORG.NS | ₹1,968.40 | +5.45% | 895.8B | 79.03 | ₹23.71 | +0.43% |
| SCHAEFFLER.BO | ₹4,248.40 | +2.55% | 655.5B | 54.00 | ₹77.66 | +0.83% |
| SCHAEFFLER.NS | ₹4,254.00 | +2.72% | 655.5B | 54.01 | ₹77.64 | +0.83% |
| UNOMINDA.NS | ₹1,137.70 | +4.65% | 651.3B | 57.28 | ₹19.69 | +0.21% |
Stock Comparison
CARRARO.NS vs MOTHERSON.NS Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, MOTHERSON.NS has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while MOTHERSON.NS trades at ₹129.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas MOTHERSON.NS's P/E ratio is 39.45. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MOTHERSON.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is less volatile compared to MOTHERSON.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check MOTHERSON.NS's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs MOTHERSON.BO Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, MOTHERSON.BO has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while MOTHERSON.BO trades at ₹128.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas MOTHERSON.BO's P/E ratio is 39.32. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MOTHERSON.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is more volatile compared to MOTHERSON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check MOTHERSON.BO's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs BOSCHLTD.BO Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, BOSCHLTD.BO has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while BOSCHLTD.BO trades at ₹38,175.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas BOSCHLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 40.29. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BOSCHLTD.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is less volatile compared to BOSCHLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check BOSCHLTD.BO's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs BOSCHLTD.NS Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, BOSCHLTD.NS has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while BOSCHLTD.NS trades at ₹38,280.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas BOSCHLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 39.16. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BOSCHLTD.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is less volatile compared to BOSCHLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check BOSCHLTD.NS's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs BHARATFORG.BO Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, BHARATFORG.BO has a market cap of 896.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while BHARATFORG.BO trades at ₹1,879.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas BHARATFORG.BO's P/E ratio is 82.89. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BHARATFORG.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is less volatile compared to BHARATFORG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check BHARATFORG.BO's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs BHARATFORG.NS Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, BHARATFORG.NS has a market cap of 895.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while BHARATFORG.NS trades at ₹1,968.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas BHARATFORG.NS's P/E ratio is 79.03. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BHARATFORG.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is less volatile compared to BHARATFORG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check BHARATFORG.NS's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs SCHAEFFLER.BO Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, SCHAEFFLER.BO has a market cap of 655.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while SCHAEFFLER.BO trades at ₹4,248.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas SCHAEFFLER.BO's P/E ratio is 54.00. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SCHAEFFLER.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is less volatile compared to SCHAEFFLER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check SCHAEFFLER.BO's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs SCHAEFFLER.NS Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, SCHAEFFLER.NS has a market cap of 655.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while SCHAEFFLER.NS trades at ₹4,254.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas SCHAEFFLER.NS's P/E ratio is 54.01. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SCHAEFFLER.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is less volatile compared to SCHAEFFLER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check SCHAEFFLER.NS's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs UNOMINDA.NS Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, UNOMINDA.NS has a market cap of 651.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while UNOMINDA.NS trades at ₹1,137.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas UNOMINDA.NS's P/E ratio is 57.28. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to UNOMINDA.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is more volatile compared to UNOMINDA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check UNOMINDA.NS's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs UNOMINDA.BO Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, UNOMINDA.BO has a market cap of 651.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while UNOMINDA.BO trades at ₹1,133.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas UNOMINDA.BO's P/E ratio is 57.24. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to UNOMINDA.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is less volatile compared to UNOMINDA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check UNOMINDA.BO's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs TIINDIA.NS Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, TIINDIA.NS has a market cap of 564.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while TIINDIA.NS trades at ₹2,980.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas TIINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 94.71. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TIINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is less volatile compared to TIINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check TIINDIA.NS's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs MRF.BO Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, MRF.BO has a market cap of 552.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while MRF.BO trades at ₹131,530.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas MRF.BO's P/E ratio is 29.87. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MRF.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is less volatile compared to MRF.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check MRF.BO's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs MRF.NS Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, MRF.NS has a market cap of 552.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while MRF.NS trades at ₹131,375.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas MRF.NS's P/E ratio is 24.78. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MRF.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is less volatile compared to MRF.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check MRF.NS's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs BALKRISIND.NS Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, BALKRISIND.NS has a market cap of 431.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while BALKRISIND.NS trades at ₹2,265.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas BALKRISIND.NS's P/E ratio is 32.84. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BALKRISIND.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is less volatile compared to BALKRISIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check BALKRISIND.NS's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs BALKRISIND.BO Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, BALKRISIND.BO has a market cap of 430.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while BALKRISIND.BO trades at ₹2,257.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas BALKRISIND.BO's P/E ratio is 32.87. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BALKRISIND.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is less volatile compared to BALKRISIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check BALKRISIND.BO's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs SONACOMS.BO Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, SONACOMS.BO has a market cap of 362.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while SONACOMS.BO trades at ₹580.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas SONACOMS.BO's P/E ratio is 59.03. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SONACOMS.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is less volatile compared to SONACOMS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check SONACOMS.BO's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs SONACOMS.NS Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, SONACOMS.NS has a market cap of 362.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while SONACOMS.NS trades at ₹582.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas SONACOMS.NS's P/E ratio is 59.21. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SONACOMS.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is less volatile compared to SONACOMS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check SONACOMS.NS's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs ENDURANCE.NS Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, ENDURANCE.NS has a market cap of 331.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while ENDURANCE.NS trades at ₹2,552.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas ENDURANCE.NS's P/E ratio is 35.92. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ENDURANCE.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is less volatile compared to ENDURANCE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check ENDURANCE.NS's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs ENDURANCE.BO Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, ENDURANCE.BO has a market cap of 331.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while ENDURANCE.BO trades at ₹2,521.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas ENDURANCE.BO's P/E ratio is 35.95. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ENDURANCE.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is less volatile compared to ENDURANCE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check ENDURANCE.BO's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs EXIDEIND.BO Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, EXIDEIND.BO has a market cap of 298.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while EXIDEIND.BO trades at ₹359.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas EXIDEIND.BO's P/E ratio is 36.11. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to EXIDEIND.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is less volatile compared to EXIDEIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check EXIDEIND.BO's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs EXIDEIND.NS Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, EXIDEIND.NS has a market cap of 298.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while EXIDEIND.NS trades at ₹362.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas EXIDEIND.NS's P/E ratio is 35.03. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to EXIDEIND.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is less volatile compared to EXIDEIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check EXIDEIND.NS's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs TVSHLTD.NS Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, TVSHLTD.NS has a market cap of 291.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while TVSHLTD.NS trades at ₹14,710.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas TVSHLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 18.90. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TVSHLTD.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is less volatile compared to TVSHLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check TVSHLTD.NS's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs TVSHLTD.BO Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, TVSHLTD.BO has a market cap of 291.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while TVSHLTD.BO trades at ₹14,760.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas TVSHLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 18.88. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TVSHLTD.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is less volatile compared to TVSHLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check TVSHLTD.BO's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs MSUMI.BO Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, MSUMI.BO has a market cap of 278.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while MSUMI.BO trades at ₹42.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas MSUMI.BO's P/E ratio is 44.73. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MSUMI.BO's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is less volatile compared to MSUMI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check MSUMI.BO's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs ZFCVINDIA.NS Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, ZFCVINDIA.NS has a market cap of 278.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while ZFCVINDIA.NS trades at ₹14,684.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas ZFCVINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 55.98. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is more volatile compared to ZFCVINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check ZFCVINDIA.NS's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs ZFCVINDIA.BO Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, ZFCVINDIA.BO has a market cap of 278.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while ZFCVINDIA.BO trades at ₹14,688.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas ZFCVINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 55.80. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ZFCVINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is more volatile compared to ZFCVINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check ZFCVINDIA.BO's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs MSUMI.NS Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, MSUMI.NS has a market cap of 278.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while MSUMI.NS trades at ₹42.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas MSUMI.NS's P/E ratio is 44.62. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MSUMI.NS's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is less volatile compared to MSUMI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check MSUMI.NS's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs APOLLOTYRE.BO Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, APOLLOTYRE.BO has a market cap of 262.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while APOLLOTYRE.BO trades at ₹413.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas APOLLOTYRE.BO's P/E ratio is 28.27. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to APOLLOTYRE.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is less volatile compared to APOLLOTYRE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check APOLLOTYRE.BO's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs APOLLOTYRE.NS Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, APOLLOTYRE.NS has a market cap of 262.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while APOLLOTYRE.NS trades at ₹413.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas APOLLOTYRE.NS's P/E ratio is 28.23. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to APOLLOTYRE.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is less volatile compared to APOLLOTYRE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check APOLLOTYRE.NS's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs ASAHIINDIA.BO Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, ASAHIINDIA.BO has a market cap of 214.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while ASAHIINDIA.BO trades at ₹846.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas ASAHIINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 69.34. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ASAHIINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is more volatile compared to ASAHIINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check ASAHIINDIA.BO's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs ASAHIINDIA.NS Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, ASAHIINDIA.NS has a market cap of 214.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while ASAHIINDIA.NS trades at ₹848.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas ASAHIINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 69.42. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ASAHIINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is more volatile compared to ASAHIINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check ASAHIINDIA.NS's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs BELRISE.BO Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, BELRISE.BO has a market cap of 197.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while BELRISE.BO trades at ₹224.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas BELRISE.BO's P/E ratio is 41.55. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BELRISE.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is more volatile compared to BELRISE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check BELRISE.BO's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs BELRISE.NS Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, BELRISE.NS has a market cap of 197.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while BELRISE.NS trades at ₹224.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas BELRISE.NS's P/E ratio is 41.44. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BELRISE.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is more volatile compared to BELRISE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check BELRISE.NS's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs MAHINDCIE.NS Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, MAHINDCIE.NS has a market cap of 194.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while MAHINDCIE.NS trades at ₹512.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas MAHINDCIE.NS's P/E ratio is 30.59. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MAHINDCIE.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is less volatile compared to MAHINDCIE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check MAHINDCIE.NS's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs CRAFTSMAN.BO Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, CRAFTSMAN.BO has a market cap of 185.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while CRAFTSMAN.BO trades at ₹8,680.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas CRAFTSMAN.BO's P/E ratio is 55.26. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CRAFTSMAN.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is less volatile compared to CRAFTSMAN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check CRAFTSMAN.BO's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs CRAFTSMAN.NS Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, CRAFTSMAN.NS has a market cap of 185.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while CRAFTSMAN.NS trades at ₹8,363.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas CRAFTSMAN.NS's P/E ratio is 55.48. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CRAFTSMAN.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is less volatile compared to CRAFTSMAN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check CRAFTSMAN.NS's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs SUNDRMFAST.NS Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, SUNDRMFAST.NS has a market cap of 182.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while SUNDRMFAST.NS trades at ₹869.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas SUNDRMFAST.NS's P/E ratio is 30.86. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SUNDRMFAST.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is more volatile compared to SUNDRMFAST.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check SUNDRMFAST.NS's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs SUNDRMFAST.BO Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, SUNDRMFAST.BO has a market cap of 182.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while SUNDRMFAST.BO trades at ₹870.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas SUNDRMFAST.BO's P/E ratio is 32.85. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SUNDRMFAST.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is more volatile compared to SUNDRMFAST.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check SUNDRMFAST.BO's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs CIEINDIA.BO Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, CIEINDIA.BO has a market cap of 181.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while CIEINDIA.BO trades at ₹485.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas CIEINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 20.94. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CIEINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is more volatile compared to CIEINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check CIEINDIA.BO's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs CIEINDIA.NS Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, CIEINDIA.NS has a market cap of 181.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while CIEINDIA.NS trades at ₹486.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas CIEINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 20.96. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CIEINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is more volatile compared to CIEINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check CIEINDIA.NS's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs SHRIPISTON.NS Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, SHRIPISTON.NS has a market cap of 156.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while SHRIPISTON.NS trades at ₹3,635.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas SHRIPISTON.NS's P/E ratio is 28.92. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SHRIPISTON.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is more volatile compared to SHRIPISTON.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check SHRIPISTON.NS's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs GABRIEL.BO Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, GABRIEL.BO has a market cap of 155.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while GABRIEL.BO trades at ₹1,103.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas GABRIEL.BO's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GABRIEL.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is less volatile compared to GABRIEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check GABRIEL.BO's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs GABRIEL.NS Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, GABRIEL.NS has a market cap of 155.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while GABRIEL.NS trades at ₹1,113.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas GABRIEL.NS's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GABRIEL.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is less volatile compared to GABRIEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check GABRIEL.NS's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs MAHSCOOTER.NS Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, MAHSCOOTER.NS has a market cap of 147.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while MAHSCOOTER.NS trades at ₹13,180.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas MAHSCOOTER.NS's P/E ratio is 47.40. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MAHSCOOTER.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is less volatile compared to MAHSCOOTER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check MAHSCOOTER.NS's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs MAHSCOOTER.BO Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, MAHSCOOTER.BO has a market cap of 146.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while MAHSCOOTER.BO trades at ₹13,155.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas MAHSCOOTER.BO's P/E ratio is 41.02. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MAHSCOOTER.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is less volatile compared to MAHSCOOTER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check MAHSCOOTER.BO's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs JBMA.NS Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, JBMA.NS has a market cap of 146.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while JBMA.NS trades at ₹622.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas JBMA.NS's P/E ratio is 192.05. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to JBMA.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is more volatile compared to JBMA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check JBMA.NS's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs JBMA.BO Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, JBMA.BO has a market cap of 146B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while JBMA.BO trades at ₹621.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas JBMA.BO's P/E ratio is 190.48. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to JBMA.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is more volatile compared to JBMA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check JBMA.BO's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs CEATLTD.BO Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, CEATLTD.BO has a market cap of 135.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while CEATLTD.BO trades at ₹3,377.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas CEATLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 24.50. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CEATLTD.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is more volatile compared to CEATLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check CEATLTD.BO's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs CEATLTD.NS Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, CEATLTD.NS has a market cap of 135.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while CEATLTD.NS trades at ₹3,389.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas CEATLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 19.41. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CEATLTD.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is more volatile compared to CEATLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check CEATLTD.NS's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs MINDACORP.NS Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, MINDACORP.NS has a market cap of 124B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while MINDACORP.NS trades at ₹538.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas MINDACORP.NS's P/E ratio is 43.85. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MINDACORP.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is less volatile compared to MINDACORP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check MINDACORP.NS's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs MINDACORP.BO Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, MINDACORP.BO has a market cap of 123.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while MINDACORP.BO trades at ₹538.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas MINDACORP.BO's P/E ratio is 43.76. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MINDACORP.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is more volatile compared to MINDACORP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check MINDACORP.BO's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs JKTYRE.NS Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, JKTYRE.NS has a market cap of 119.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while JKTYRE.NS trades at ₹414.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas JKTYRE.NS's P/E ratio is 16.85. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to JKTYRE.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is less volatile compared to JKTYRE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check JKTYRE.NS's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs JKTYRE.BO Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, JKTYRE.BO has a market cap of 119.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while JKTYRE.BO trades at ₹413.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas JKTYRE.BO's P/E ratio is 21.22. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to JKTYRE.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS and JKTYRE.BO have similar daily volatility (2.13).Check JKTYRE.BO's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs LUMAXTECH.BO Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, LUMAXTECH.BO has a market cap of 112.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while LUMAXTECH.BO trades at ₹1,688.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas LUMAXTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 52.93. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LUMAXTECH.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is less volatile compared to LUMAXTECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check LUMAXTECH.BO's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs LUMAXTECH.NS Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, LUMAXTECH.NS has a market cap of 112.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while LUMAXTECH.NS trades at ₹1,693.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas LUMAXTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 45.07. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LUMAXTECH.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is less volatile compared to LUMAXTECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check LUMAXTECH.NS's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs SUNCLAYLTD.NS Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, SUNCLAYLTD.NS has a market cap of 109.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while SUNCLAYLTD.NS trades at ₹5,426.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas SUNCLAYLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 16.90. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SUNCLAYLTD.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is less volatile compared to SUNCLAYLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check SUNCLAYLTD.NS's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs OLECTRA.NS Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, OLECTRA.NS has a market cap of 104.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while OLECTRA.NS trades at ₹1,268.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas OLECTRA.NS's P/E ratio is 73.04. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to OLECTRA.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is more volatile compared to OLECTRA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check OLECTRA.NS's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs ASKAUTOLTD.BO Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, ASKAUTOLTD.BO has a market cap of 91.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while ASKAUTOLTD.BO trades at ₹457.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas ASKAUTOLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 32.17. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ASKAUTOLTD.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is more volatile compared to ASKAUTOLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check ASKAUTOLTD.BO's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs BANCOINDIA.NS Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, BANCOINDIA.NS has a market cap of 90.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while BANCOINDIA.NS trades at ₹640.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas BANCOINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 18.63. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BANCOINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is less volatile compared to BANCOINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check BANCOINDIA.NS's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs BANCOINDIA.BO Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, BANCOINDIA.BO has a market cap of 90.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while BANCOINDIA.BO trades at ₹640.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas BANCOINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 40.24. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BANCOINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is less volatile compared to BANCOINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check BANCOINDIA.BO's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs ASKAUTOLTD.NS Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, ASKAUTOLTD.NS has a market cap of 90.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while ASKAUTOLTD.NS trades at ₹457.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas ASKAUTOLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 31.99. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ASKAUTOLTD.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is more volatile compared to ASKAUTOLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check ASKAUTOLTD.NS's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs DYNAMATECH.NS Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, DYNAMATECH.NS has a market cap of 84.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while DYNAMATECH.NS trades at ₹12,306.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas DYNAMATECH.NS's P/E ratio is 232.72. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DYNAMATECH.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is less volatile compared to DYNAMATECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check DYNAMATECH.NS's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs DYNAMATECH.BO Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, DYNAMATECH.BO has a market cap of 84.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while DYNAMATECH.BO trades at ₹12,339.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas DYNAMATECH.BO's P/E ratio is 232.57. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DYNAMATECH.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is less volatile compared to DYNAMATECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check DYNAMATECH.BO's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs VARROC.BO Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, VARROC.BO has a market cap of 83.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while VARROC.BO trades at ₹565.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas VARROC.BO's P/E ratio is 47.25. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to VARROC.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is less volatile compared to VARROC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check VARROC.BO's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs VARROC.NS Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, VARROC.NS has a market cap of 83.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while VARROC.NS trades at ₹565.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas VARROC.NS's P/E ratio is 47.16. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to VARROC.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is less volatile compared to VARROC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check VARROC.NS's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs BENGALASM.BO Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, BENGALASM.BO has a market cap of 76.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while BENGALASM.BO trades at ₹6,799.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas BENGALASM.BO's P/E ratio is 10.11. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BENGALASM.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is more volatile compared to BENGALASM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check BENGALASM.BO's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs PRICOLLTD.BO Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, PRICOLLTD.BO has a market cap of 71.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while PRICOLLTD.BO trades at ₹615.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas PRICOLLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 33.66. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PRICOLLTD.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is less volatile compared to PRICOLLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check PRICOLLTD.BO's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs PRICOLLTD.NS Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, PRICOLLTD.NS has a market cap of 71.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while PRICOLLTD.NS trades at ₹617.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas PRICOLLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 33.65. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PRICOLLTD.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is less volatile compared to PRICOLLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check PRICOLLTD.NS's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs SJS.BO Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, SJS.BO has a market cap of 62.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while SJS.BO trades at ₹2,009.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas SJS.BO's P/E ratio is 40.34. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SJS.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is less volatile compared to SJS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check SJS.BO's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs SJS.NS Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, SJS.NS has a market cap of 62.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while SJS.NS trades at ₹2,008.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas SJS.NS's P/E ratio is 40.21. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SJS.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is less volatile compared to SJS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check SJS.NS's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs FIEMIND.BO Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, FIEMIND.BO has a market cap of 59.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while FIEMIND.BO trades at ₹2,269.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas FIEMIND.BO's P/E ratio is 26.17. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FIEMIND.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is more volatile compared to FIEMIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check FIEMIND.BO's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs FIEMIND.NS Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, FIEMIND.NS has a market cap of 59.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while FIEMIND.NS trades at ₹2,269.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas FIEMIND.NS's P/E ratio is 24.38. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FIEMIND.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is more volatile compared to FIEMIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check FIEMIND.NS's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs SUPRAJIT.NS Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, SUPRAJIT.NS has a market cap of 57.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while SUPRAJIT.NS trades at ₹432.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas SUPRAJIT.NS's P/E ratio is 41.37. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SUPRAJIT.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is less volatile compared to SUPRAJIT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check SUPRAJIT.NS's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs SUPRAJIT.BO Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, SUPRAJIT.BO has a market cap of 57.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while SUPRAJIT.BO trades at ₹430.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas SUPRAJIT.BO's P/E ratio is 36.08. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SUPRAJIT.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is less volatile compared to SUPRAJIT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check SUPRAJIT.BO's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs LGBBROSLTD.NS Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, LGBBROSLTD.NS has a market cap of 54.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while LGBBROSLTD.NS trades at ₹1,740.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas LGBBROSLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 16.38. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LGBBROSLTD.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is more volatile compared to LGBBROSLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check LGBBROSLTD.NS's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs LGBBROSLTD.BO Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, LGBBROSLTD.BO has a market cap of 54.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while LGBBROSLTD.BO trades at ₹1,734.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas LGBBROSLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 17.03. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LGBBROSLTD.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is more volatile compared to LGBBROSLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check LGBBROSLTD.BO's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs SHARDAMOTR.BO Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, SHARDAMOTR.BO has a market cap of 52B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while SHARDAMOTR.BO trades at ₹910.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas SHARDAMOTR.BO's P/E ratio is 15.43. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SHARDAMOTR.BO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is less volatile compared to SHARDAMOTR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check SHARDAMOTR.BO's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs SHARDAMOTR.NS Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, SHARDAMOTR.NS has a market cap of 51.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while SHARDAMOTR.NS trades at ₹913.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas SHARDAMOTR.NS's P/E ratio is 15.03. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SHARDAMOTR.NS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is less volatile compared to SHARDAMOTR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check SHARDAMOTR.NS's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs SUBROS.NS Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, SUBROS.NS has a market cap of 51.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while SUBROS.NS trades at ₹809.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas SUBROS.NS's P/E ratio is 31.47. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SUBROS.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is less volatile compared to SUBROS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check SUBROS.NS's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs SUBROS.BO Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, SUBROS.BO has a market cap of 51.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while SUBROS.BO trades at ₹803.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas SUBROS.BO's P/E ratio is 31.42. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SUBROS.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is less volatile compared to SUBROS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check SUBROS.BO's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs JAMNAAUTO.NS Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, JAMNAAUTO.NS has a market cap of 49.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while JAMNAAUTO.NS trades at ₹130.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas JAMNAAUTO.NS's P/E ratio is 25.74. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to JAMNAAUTO.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is less volatile compared to JAMNAAUTO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check JAMNAAUTO.NS's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs JAMNAAUTO.BO Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, JAMNAAUTO.BO has a market cap of 49.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while JAMNAAUTO.BO trades at ₹130.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas JAMNAAUTO.BO's P/E ratio is 25.71. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to JAMNAAUTO.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is less volatile compared to JAMNAAUTO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check JAMNAAUTO.BO's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs LUMAXIND.NS Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, LUMAXIND.NS has a market cap of 49.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while LUMAXIND.NS trades at ₹5,323.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas LUMAXIND.NS's P/E ratio is 30.28. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LUMAXIND.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is more volatile compared to LUMAXIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check LUMAXIND.NS's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs LUMAXIND.BO Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, LUMAXIND.BO has a market cap of 49.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while LUMAXIND.BO trades at ₹5,333.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas LUMAXIND.BO's P/E ratio is 30.29. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LUMAXIND.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is less volatile compared to LUMAXIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check LUMAXIND.BO's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs SWARAJENG.NS Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, SWARAJENG.NS has a market cap of 48.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while SWARAJENG.NS trades at ₹4,004.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas SWARAJENG.NS's P/E ratio is 24.65. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SWARAJENG.NS's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is more volatile compared to SWARAJENG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check SWARAJENG.NS's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs SWARAJENG.BO Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, SWARAJENG.BO has a market cap of 48.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while SWARAJENG.BO trades at ₹4,022.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas SWARAJENG.BO's P/E ratio is 25.79. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SWARAJENG.BO's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is more volatile compared to SWARAJENG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check SWARAJENG.BO's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs JTEKTINDIA.NS Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, JTEKTINDIA.NS has a market cap of 39.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while JTEKTINDIA.NS trades at ₹142.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas JTEKTINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 50.84. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to JTEKTINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is less volatile compared to JTEKTINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check JTEKTINDIA.NS's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs JTEKTINDIA.BO Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, JTEKTINDIA.BO has a market cap of 39.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while JTEKTINDIA.BO trades at ₹142.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas JTEKTINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 50.73. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to JTEKTINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is less volatile compared to JTEKTINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check JTEKTINDIA.BO's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs SSWL.BO Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, SSWL.BO has a market cap of 33.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while SSWL.BO trades at ₹214.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas SSWL.BO's P/E ratio is 17.88. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SSWL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is more volatile compared to SSWL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check SSWL.BO's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs SSWL.NS Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, SSWL.NS has a market cap of 33.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while SSWL.NS trades at ₹213.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas SSWL.NS's P/E ratio is 17.82. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SSWL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is more volatile compared to SSWL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check SSWL.NS's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs TVSSRICHAK.BO Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, TVSSRICHAK.BO has a market cap of 30.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while TVSSRICHAK.BO trades at ₹3,960.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas TVSSRICHAK.BO's P/E ratio is 68.80. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TVSSRICHAK.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is less volatile compared to TVSSRICHAK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check TVSSRICHAK.BO's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs WHEELS.BO Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, WHEELS.BO has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while WHEELS.BO trades at ₹1,303.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas WHEELS.BO's P/E ratio is 22.71. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to WHEELS.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is less volatile compared to WHEELS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check WHEELS.BO's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs WHEELS.NS Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, WHEELS.NS has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while WHEELS.NS trades at ₹1,310.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas WHEELS.NS's P/E ratio is 22.72. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to WHEELS.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is less volatile compared to WHEELS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check WHEELS.NS's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs SANDHAR.NS Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, SANDHAR.NS has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while SANDHAR.NS trades at ₹528.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas SANDHAR.NS's P/E ratio is 17.27. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SANDHAR.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is less volatile compared to SANDHAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check SANDHAR.NS's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs SANDHAR.BO Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, SANDHAR.BO has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while SANDHAR.BO trades at ₹529.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas SANDHAR.BO's P/E ratio is 17.25. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SANDHAR.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is less volatile compared to SANDHAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check SANDHAR.BO's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs TVSSRICHAK.NS Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, TVSSRICHAK.NS has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while TVSSRICHAK.NS trades at ₹3,956.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas TVSSRICHAK.NS's P/E ratio is 68.24. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TVSSRICHAK.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is less volatile compared to TVSSRICHAK.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check TVSSRICHAK.NS's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs NRBBEARING.BO Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, NRBBEARING.BO has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while NRBBEARING.BO trades at ₹300.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas NRBBEARING.BO's P/E ratio is 30.86. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NRBBEARING.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is less volatile compared to NRBBEARING.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check NRBBEARING.BO's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs NRBBEARING.NS Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, NRBBEARING.NS has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while NRBBEARING.NS trades at ₹301.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas NRBBEARING.NS's P/E ratio is 28.54. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NRBBEARING.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is less volatile compared to NRBBEARING.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check NRBBEARING.NS's competition here
CARRARO.NS vs AUTOAXLES.BO Comparison May 2026
CARRARO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CARRARO.NS stands at 32.9B. In comparison, AUTOAXLES.BO has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CARRARO.NS is priced at ₹587.00, while AUTOAXLES.BO trades at ₹1,839.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CARRARO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.24, whereas AUTOAXLES.BO's P/E ratio is 17.74. In terms of profitability, CARRARO.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AUTOAXLES.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CARRARO.NS is more volatile compared to AUTOAXLES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CARRARO.NS.Check AUTOAXLES.BO's competition here