Ziff Davis, Inc.

ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.8B. In comparison, OMC has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $47.21, while OMC trades at $76.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 41.05, whereas OMC's P/E ratio is -284.81. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OMC's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is more volatile compared to OMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.Check OMC's competition here

ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.8B. In comparison, IPG has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $47.21, while IPG trades at $24.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 41.05, whereas IPG's P/E ratio is 16.83. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IPG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is more volatile compared to IPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.Check IPG's competition here

ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.8B. In comparison, QMMM has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $47.21, while QMMM trades at $119.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 41.05, whereas QMMM's P/E ratio is -702.35. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to QMMM's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is more volatile compared to QMMM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.Check QMMM's competition here

ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.8B. In comparison, WPP has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $47.21, while WPP trades at $17.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 41.05, whereas WPP's P/E ratio is -13.04. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WPP's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is more volatile compared to WPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.Check WPP's competition here

ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MDCA has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $47.21, while MDCA trades at $5.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 41.05, whereas MDCA's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MDCA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is less volatile compared to MDCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.Check MDCA's competition here

ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CMPR has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $47.21, while CMPR trades at $82.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 41.05, whereas CMPR's P/E ratio is 84.37. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CMPR's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is more volatile compared to CMPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.Check CMPR's competition here

ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MGNI has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $47.21, while MGNI trades at $12.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 41.05, whereas MGNI's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MGNI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is more volatile compared to MGNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.Check MGNI's competition here

ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.8B. In comparison, IAS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $47.21, while IAS trades at $10.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 41.05, whereas IAS's P/E ratio is 36.93. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IAS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is more volatile compared to IAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.Check IAS's competition here

ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.8B. In comparison, STGW has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $47.21, while STGW trades at $6.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 41.05, whereas STGW's P/E ratio is 84.00. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to STGW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is more volatile compared to STGW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.Check STGW's competition here

ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.8B. In comparison, DLX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $47.21, while DLX trades at $30.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 41.05, whereas DLX's P/E ratio is 16.75. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DLX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is more volatile compared to DLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.Check DLX's competition here

ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CCO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $47.21, while CCO trades at $2.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 41.05, whereas CCO's P/E ratio is -10.82. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CCO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is more volatile compared to CCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.Check CCO's competition here

ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.8B. In comparison, EEX has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $47.21, while EEX trades at $5.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 41.05, whereas EEX's P/E ratio is -33.93. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EEX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is less volatile compared to EEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.Check EEX's competition here

ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CRTO has a market cap of 989.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $47.21, while CRTO trades at $19.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 41.05, whereas CRTO's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CRTO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is more volatile compared to CRTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.Check CRTO's competition here

ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BOMN has a market cap of 765M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $47.21, while BOMN trades at $25.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 41.05, whereas BOMN's P/E ratio is 8.65. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BOMN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is less volatile compared to BOMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.Check BOMN's competition here

ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.8B. In comparison, QNST has a market cap of 755.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $47.21, while QNST trades at $13.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 41.05, whereas QNST's P/E ratio is 12.39. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to QNST's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is more volatile compared to QNST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.Check QNST's competition here

ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MNTN has a market cap of 738M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $47.21, while MNTN trades at $10.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 41.05, whereas MNTN's P/E ratio is -76.85. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MNTN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is more volatile compared to MNTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.Check MNTN's competition here

ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ADV has a market cap of 475.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $47.21, while ADV trades at $36.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 41.05, whereas ADV's P/E ratio is -2.08. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ADV's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is less volatile compared to ADV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.Check ADV's competition here

ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CTV-WT has a market cap of 473.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $47.21, while CTV-WT trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 41.05, whereas CTV-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CTV-WT's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is more volatile compared to CTV-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.Check CTV-WT's competition here

ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CTV has a market cap of 473.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $47.21, while CTV trades at $3.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 41.05, whereas CTV's P/E ratio is -34.89. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CTV's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is more volatile compared to CTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.Check CTV's competition here

ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.8B. In comparison, NEXN has a market cap of 409M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $47.21, while NEXN trades at $7.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 41.05, whereas NEXN's P/E ratio is 17.90. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NEXN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is less volatile compared to NEXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.Check NEXN's competition here

ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.8B. In comparison, QUOT has a market cap of 398.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $47.21, while QUOT trades at $4.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 41.05, whereas QUOT's P/E ratio is -9.74. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to QUOT's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is more volatile compared to QUOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.Check QUOT's competition here

ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BOC has a market cap of 374M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $47.21, while BOC trades at $12.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 41.05, whereas BOC's P/E ratio is -30.49. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BOC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is more volatile compared to BOC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.Check BOC's competition here

ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.8B. In comparison, NCMI has a market cap of 334.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $47.21, while NCMI trades at $3.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 41.05, whereas NCMI's P/E ratio is -32.64. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NCMI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is more volatile compared to NCMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.Check NCMI's competition here

ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ADTH has a market cap of 294.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $47.21, while ADTH trades at $3.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 41.05, whereas ADTH's P/E ratio is -64.10. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ADTH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is more volatile compared to ADTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.Check ADTH's competition here

ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.8B. In comparison, TRMR has a market cap of 182.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $47.21, while TRMR trades at $5.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 41.05, whereas TRMR's P/E ratio is -17.93. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TRMR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is more volatile compared to TRMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.Check TRMR's competition here

ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.8B. In comparison, TZOO has a market cap of 114.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $47.21, while TZOO trades at $10.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 41.05, whereas TZOO's P/E ratio is 25.54. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TZOO's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is less volatile compared to TZOO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.Check TZOO's competition here

ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.8B. In comparison, TSQ has a market cap of 108.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $47.21, while TSQ trades at $6.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 41.05, whereas TSQ's P/E ratio is -8.92. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TSQ's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is less volatile compared to TSQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.Check TSQ's competition here

ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ATY has a market cap of 90.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $47.21, while ATY trades at $1.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 41.05, whereas ATY's P/E ratio is -160.00. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ATY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is more volatile compared to ATY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.Check ATY's competition here

ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.8B. In comparison, WIMI has a market cap of 84M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $47.21, while WIMI trades at $1.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 41.05, whereas WIMI's P/E ratio is 0.73. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WIMI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is less volatile compared to WIMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.Check WIMI's competition here

ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ICLK has a market cap of 82M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $47.21, while ICLK trades at $9.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 41.05, whereas ICLK's P/E ratio is -3.23. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ICLK's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is less volatile compared to ICLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.Check ICLK's competition here

ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MNTN-WT has a market cap of 80.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $47.21, while MNTN-WT trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 41.05, whereas MNTN-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MNTN-WT's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is less volatile compared to MNTN-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.Check MNTN-WT's competition here

ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.8B. In comparison, XNET has a market cap of 79.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $47.21, while XNET trades at $6.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 41.05, whereas XNET's P/E ratio is 0.38. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to XNET's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is more volatile compared to XNET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.Check XNET's competition here

ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MCHX has a market cap of 77.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $47.21, while MCHX trades at $1.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 41.05, whereas MCHX's P/E ratio is -14.58. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MCHX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is more volatile compared to MCHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.Check MCHX's competition here

ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.8B. In comparison, STCN has a market cap of 77.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $47.21, while STCN trades at $12.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 41.05, whereas STCN's P/E ratio is 4.02. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to STCN's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is less volatile compared to STCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.Check STCN's competition here

ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.8B. In comparison, FLNT has a market cap of 60.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $47.21, while FLNT trades at $3.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 41.05, whereas FLNT's P/E ratio is -2.93. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FLNT's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is more volatile compared to FLNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.Check FLNT's competition here

ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CDLX has a market cap of 49.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $47.21, while CDLX trades at $0.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 41.05, whereas CDLX's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CDLX's ROE of -3.71%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is less volatile compared to CDLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.Check CDLX's competition here

ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SDM has a market cap of 49.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $47.21, while SDM trades at $1.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 41.05, whereas SDM's P/E ratio is 26.43. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SDM's ROE of -4.93%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is more volatile compared to SDM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.Check SDM's competition here

ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CHR has a market cap of 48.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $47.21, while CHR trades at $1.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 41.05, whereas CHR's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CHR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is less volatile compared to CHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.Check CHR's competition here

ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ADTHW has a market cap of 43.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $47.21, while ADTHW trades at $0.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 41.05, whereas ADTHW's P/E ratio is 1.51. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ADTHW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is less volatile compared to ADTHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.Check ADTHW's competition here

ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.8B. In comparison, TZUP has a market cap of 42.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $47.21, while TZUP trades at $4.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 41.05, whereas TZUP's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TZUP's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is less volatile compared to TZUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.Check TZUP's competition here

ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.8B. In comparison, GSMG has a market cap of 40.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $47.21, while GSMG trades at $0.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 41.05, whereas GSMG's P/E ratio is 1.16. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GSMG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is less volatile compared to GSMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.Check GSMG's competition here

ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ABLV has a market cap of 39.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $47.21, while ABLV trades at $0.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 41.05, whereas ABLV's P/E ratio is -3.99. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ABLV's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is less volatile compared to ABLV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.Check ABLV's competition here

ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MOXC has a market cap of 35.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $47.21, while MOXC trades at $1.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 41.05, whereas MOXC's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MOXC's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is less volatile compared to MOXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.Check MOXC's competition here

ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MOBQ has a market cap of 32.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $47.21, while MOBQ trades at $1.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 41.05, whereas MOBQ's P/E ratio is -2.63. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MOBQ's ROE of -4.74%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is less volatile compared to MOBQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.Check MOBQ's competition here

ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ACCS has a market cap of 30.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $47.21, while ACCS trades at $7.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 41.05, whereas ACCS's P/E ratio is -19.86. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ACCS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is less volatile compared to ACCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.Check ACCS's competition here

ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SWAG has a market cap of 28.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $47.21, while SWAG trades at $1.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 41.05, whereas SWAG's P/E ratio is -38.00. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SWAG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is less volatile compared to SWAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.Check SWAG's competition here

ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.8B. In comparison, INUV has a market cap of 27.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $47.21, while INUV trades at $1.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 41.05, whereas INUV's P/E ratio is -5.37. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to INUV's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is more volatile compared to INUV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.Check INUV's competition here

ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.8B. In comparison, HHS has a market cap of 20.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $47.21, while HHS trades at $2.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 41.05, whereas HHS's P/E ratio is -25.09. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HHS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is less volatile compared to HHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.Check HHS's competition here

ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.8B. In comparison, TJGC has a market cap of 19.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $47.21, while TJGC trades at $1.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 41.05, whereas TJGC's P/E ratio is -3.61. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TJGC's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is less volatile compared to TJGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.Check TJGC's competition here

ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MCTR has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $47.21, while MCTR trades at $0.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 41.05, whereas MCTR's P/E ratio is -3.76. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MCTR's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is more volatile compared to MCTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.Check MCTR's competition here

ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ISIG has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $47.21, while ISIG trades at $7.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 41.05, whereas ISIG's P/E ratio is 1.19. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ISIG's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is less volatile compared to ISIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.Check ISIG's competition here

ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.8B. In comparison, FTRK has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $47.21, while FTRK trades at $0.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 41.05, whereas FTRK's P/E ratio is -4.67. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FTRK's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is less volatile compared to FTRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.Check FTRK's competition here

ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.8B. In comparison, HAO has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $47.21, while HAO trades at $1.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 41.05, whereas HAO's P/E ratio is 0.35. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HAO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is less volatile compared to HAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.Check HAO's competition here

ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.8B. In comparison, DMS has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $47.21, while DMS trades at $2.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 41.05, whereas DMS's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DMS's ROE of +2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is less volatile compared to DMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.Check DMS's competition here

ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.8B. In comparison, LDWY has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $47.21, while LDWY trades at $3.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 41.05, whereas LDWY's P/E ratio is -2.70. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LDWY's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is more volatile compared to LDWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.Check LDWY's competition here

ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.8B. In comparison, DRCTW has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $47.21, while DRCTW trades at $0.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 41.05, whereas DRCTW's P/E ratio is 0.16. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DRCTW's ROE of +3.61%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is more volatile compared to DRCTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.Check DRCTW's competition here

ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.8B. In comparison, YDKG has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $47.21, while YDKG trades at $0.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 41.05, whereas YDKG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to YDKG's ROE of -2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is less volatile compared to YDKG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.Check YDKG's competition here

ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.8B. In comparison, KUST has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $47.21, while KUST trades at $3.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 41.05, whereas KUST's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KUST's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is less volatile compared to KUST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.Check KUST's competition here

ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.8B. In comparison, EDHL has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $47.21, while EDHL trades at $2.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 41.05, whereas EDHL's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EDHL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is less volatile compared to EDHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.Check EDHL's competition here

ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BAOS has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $47.21, while BAOS trades at $2.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 41.05, whereas BAOS's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BAOS's ROE of -2.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is more volatile compared to BAOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.Check BAOS's competition here

ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MGOL has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $47.21, while MGOL trades at $0.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 41.05, whereas MGOL's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MGOL's ROE of -21.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is less volatile compared to MGOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.Check MGOL's competition here

ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.8B. In comparison, VSME has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $47.21, while VSME trades at $0.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 41.05, whereas VSME's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VSME's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is more volatile compared to VSME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.Check VSME's competition here

ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.8B. In comparison, STRNW has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $47.21, while STRNW trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 41.05, whereas STRNW's P/E ratio is -39.93. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to STRNW's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is less volatile compared to STRNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.Check STRNW's competition here

ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CNET has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $47.21, while CNET trades at $0.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 41.05, whereas CNET's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CNET's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is less volatile compared to CNET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.Check CNET's competition here

ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ADVWW has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $47.21, while ADVWW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 41.05, whereas ADVWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ADVWW's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is less volatile compared to ADVWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.Check ADVWW's competition here

ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.8B. In comparison, STFS has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $47.21, while STFS trades at $4.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 41.05, whereas STFS's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to STFS's ROE of -2.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is less volatile compared to STFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.Check STFS's competition here

ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ABLVW has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $47.21, while ABLVW trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 41.05, whereas ABLVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ABLVW's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is less volatile compared to ABLVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.Check ABLVW's competition here

ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SWAGW has a market cap of 601.7K. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $47.21, while SWAGW trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 41.05, whereas SWAGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SWAGW's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is more volatile compared to SWAGW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.Check SWAGW's competition here

ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.8B. In comparison, TRKAW has a market cap of 529.8K. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $47.21, while TRKAW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 41.05, whereas TRKAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TRKAW's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is less volatile compared to TRKAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.Check TRKAW's competition here

ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.8B. In comparison, DRCT has a market cap of 413.4K. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $47.21, while DRCT trades at $2.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 41.05, whereas DRCT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DRCT's ROE of +3.61%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is less volatile compared to DRCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.Check DRCT's competition here

ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SRAX has a market cap of 294.4K. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $47.21, while SRAX trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 41.05, whereas SRAX's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SRAX's ROE of -5.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is less volatile compared to SRAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.Check SRAX's competition here

ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MOBQW has a market cap of 44.2K. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $47.21, while MOBQW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 41.05, whereas MOBQW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MOBQW's ROE of -4.74%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is more volatile compared to MOBQW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.Check MOBQW's competition here

ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.8B. In comparison, GSMGW has a market cap of 9.3K. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $47.21, while GSMGW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 41.05, whereas GSMGW's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GSMGW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is less volatile compared to GSMGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.Check GSMGW's competition here

ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.8B. In comparison, DMS-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $47.21, while DMS-WT trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 41.05, whereas DMS-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DMS-WT's ROE of +2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is more volatile compared to DMS-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.Check DMS-WT's competition here

ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SZMK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $47.21, while SZMK trades at $3.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 41.05, whereas SZMK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SZMK's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is more volatile compared to SZMK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.Check SZMK's competition here

ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ZDVSV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $47.21, while ZDVSV trades at $123.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 41.05, whereas ZDVSV's P/E ratio is 27.03. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ZDVSV's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is more volatile compared to ZDVSV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.Check ZDVSV's competition here

ZD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZD stands at 1.8B. In comparison, TRKA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ZD is priced at $47.21, while TRKA trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZD currently has a P/E ratio of 41.05, whereas TRKA's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ZD's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TRKA's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, ZD is less volatile compared to TRKA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZD.Check TRKA's competition here