Fluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLNT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Fluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLNT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 77.5M. In comparison, OMC has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $4.04 on the NASDAQ, while OMC trades at $85.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -5.29, whereas OMC's P/E ratio is 9.71. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to OMC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to OMC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check OMC's competition here

Fluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLNT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 77.5M. In comparison, IPG has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $4.04 on the NASDAQ, while IPG trades at $24.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -5.29, whereas IPG's P/E ratio is 16.83. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to IPG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to IPG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check IPG's competition here

Fluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLNT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 77.5M. In comparison, WPP has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $4.04 on the NASDAQ, while WPP trades at $27.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -5.29, whereas WPP's P/E ratio is 8.68. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to WPP's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to WPP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check WPP's competition here

Fluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLNT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 77.5M. In comparison, QMMM has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $4.04 on the NASDAQ, while QMMM trades at $119.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -5.29, whereas QMMM's P/E ratio is -702.35. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to QMMM's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to QMMM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check QMMM's competition here

Fluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLNT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 77.5M. In comparison, VSNT has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $4.04 on the NASDAQ, while VSNT trades at $38.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -5.29, whereas VSNT's P/E ratio is 7.96. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to VSNT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to VSNT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check VSNT's competition here

Fluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLNT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 77.5M. In comparison, MGNI has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $4.04 on the NASDAQ, while MGNI trades at $24.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -5.29, whereas MGNI's P/E ratio is 26.58. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to MGNI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to MGNI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check MGNI's competition here

Fluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLNT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 77.5M. In comparison, MDCA has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $4.04 on the NASDAQ, while MDCA trades at $5.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -5.29, whereas MDCA's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to MDCA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to MDCA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check MDCA's competition here

Fluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLNT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 77.5M. In comparison, STGW has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $4.04 on the NASDAQ, while STGW trades at $9.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -5.29, whereas STGW's P/E ratio is 10.41. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to STGW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to STGW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check STGW's competition here

Fluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLNT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 77.5M. In comparison, ZD has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $4.04 on the NASDAQ, while ZD trades at $53.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -5.29, whereas ZD's P/E ratio is 8.56. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to ZD's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to ZD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check ZD's competition here

Fluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLNT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 77.5M. In comparison, IAS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $4.04 on the NASDAQ, while IAS trades at $10.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -5.29, whereas IAS's P/E ratio is 36.93. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to IAS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to IAS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check IAS's competition here

Fluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLNT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 77.5M. In comparison, CCO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $4.04 on the NASDAQ, while CCO trades at $2.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -5.29, whereas CCO's P/E ratio is -13.44. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to CCO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to CCO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check CCO's competition here

Fluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLNT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 77.5M. In comparison, QNST has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $4.04 on the NASDAQ, while QNST trades at $21.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -5.29, whereas QNST's P/E ratio is 20.67. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to QNST's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to QNST. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check QNST's competition here

Fluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLNT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 77.5M. In comparison, DLX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $4.04 on the NASDAQ, while DLX trades at $25.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -5.29, whereas DLX's P/E ratio is 6.30. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to DLX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to DLX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check DLX's competition here

Fluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLNT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 77.5M. In comparison, EEX has a market cap of 997.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $4.04 on the NASDAQ, while EEX trades at $5.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -5.29, whereas EEX's P/E ratio is -26.53. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to EEX's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to EEX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check EEX's competition here

Fluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLNT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 77.5M. In comparison, CRTO has a market cap of 923.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $4.04 on the NASDAQ, while CRTO trades at $18.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -5.29, whereas CRTO's P/E ratio is 4.44. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to CRTO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to CRTO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check CRTO's competition here

Fluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLNT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 77.5M. In comparison, BOMN has a market cap of 765M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $4.04 on the NASDAQ, while BOMN trades at $25.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -5.29, whereas BOMN's P/E ratio is 8.65. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to BOMN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to BOMN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check BOMN's competition here

Fluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLNT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 77.5M. In comparison, NEXN has a market cap of 607.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $4.04 on the NASDAQ, while NEXN trades at $10.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -5.29, whereas NEXN's P/E ratio is 12.39. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to NEXN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to NEXN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check NEXN's competition here

Fluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLNT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 77.5M. In comparison, CTV has a market cap of 473.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $4.04 on the NASDAQ, while CTV trades at $3.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -5.29, whereas CTV's P/E ratio is -34.89. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to CTV's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to CTV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check CTV's competition here

Fluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLNT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 77.5M. In comparison, CTV-WT has a market cap of 473.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $4.04 on the NASDAQ, while CTV-WT trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -5.29, whereas CTV-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to CTV-WT's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to CTV-WT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check CTV-WT's competition here

Fluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLNT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 77.5M. In comparison, BOC has a market cap of 436.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $4.04 on the NASDAQ, while BOC trades at $14.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -5.29, whereas BOC's P/E ratio is -32.84. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to BOC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to BOC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check BOC's competition here

Fluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLNT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 77.5M. In comparison, QUOT has a market cap of 398.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $4.04 on the NASDAQ, while QUOT trades at $4.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -5.29, whereas QUOT's P/E ratio is -9.74. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to QUOT's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to QUOT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check QUOT's competition here

Fluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLNT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 77.5M. In comparison, NCMI has a market cap of 377.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $4.04 on the NASDAQ, while NCMI trades at $4.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -5.29, whereas NCMI's P/E ratio is -93.66. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to NCMI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to NCMI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check NCMI's competition here

Fluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLNT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 77.5M. In comparison, ADV has a market cap of 374.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $4.04 on the NASDAQ, while ADV trades at $28.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -5.29, whereas ADV's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to ADV's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is less volatile compared to ADV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check ADV's competition here

Fluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLNT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 77.5M. In comparison, ADTH has a market cap of 294.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $4.04 on the NASDAQ, while ADTH trades at $3.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -5.29, whereas ADTH's P/E ratio is -64.10. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to ADTH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to ADTH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check ADTH's competition here

Fluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLNT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 77.5M. In comparison, TRMR has a market cap of 182.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $4.04 on the NASDAQ, while TRMR trades at $5.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -5.29, whereas TRMR's P/E ratio is -17.93. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to TRMR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to TRMR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check TRMR's competition here

Fluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLNT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 77.5M. In comparison, ATY has a market cap of 90.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $4.04 on the NASDAQ, while ATY trades at $1.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -5.29, whereas ATY's P/E ratio is -160.00. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to ATY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to ATY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check ATY's competition here

Fluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLNT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 77.5M. In comparison, ICLK has a market cap of 82M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $4.04 on the NASDAQ, while ICLK trades at $9.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -5.29, whereas ICLK's P/E ratio is -3.23. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to ICLK's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to ICLK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check ICLK's competition here

Fluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLNT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 77.5M. In comparison, MNTN-WT has a market cap of 80.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $4.04 on the NASDAQ, while MNTN-WT trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -5.29, whereas MNTN-WT's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to MNTN-WT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is less volatile compared to MNTN-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check MNTN-WT's competition here

Fluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLNT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 77.5M. In comparison, MCHX has a market cap of 80M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $4.04 on the NASDAQ, while MCHX trades at $1.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -5.29, whereas MCHX's P/E ratio is -25.79. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to MCHX's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to MCHX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check MCHX's competition here

Fluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLNT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 77.5M. In comparison, STCN has a market cap of 77.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $4.04 on the NASDAQ, while STCN trades at $12.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -5.29, whereas STCN's P/E ratio is 4.02. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to STCN's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to STCN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check STCN's competition here

Fluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLNT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 77.5M. In comparison, GRSD has a market cap of 66.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $4.04 on the NASDAQ, while GRSD trades at $1.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -5.29, whereas GRSD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to GRSD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to GRSD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check GRSD's competition here

Fluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLNT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 77.5M. In comparison, XNET has a market cap of 64.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $4.04 on the NASDAQ, while XNET trades at $5.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -5.29, whereas XNET's P/E ratio is 14.22. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to XNET's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to XNET. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check XNET's competition here

Fluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLNT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 77.5M. In comparison, IZEA has a market cap of 60.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $4.04 on the NASDAQ, while IZEA trades at $3.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -5.29, whereas IZEA's P/E ratio is -116.00. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to IZEA's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to IZEA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check IZEA's competition here

Fluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLNT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 77.5M. In comparison, CHR has a market cap of 54.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $4.04 on the NASDAQ, while CHR trades at $1.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -5.29, whereas CHR's P/E ratio is 0.51. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to CHR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to CHR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check CHR's competition here

Fluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLNT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 77.5M. In comparison, SDM has a market cap of 49.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $4.04 on the NASDAQ, while SDM trades at $1.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -5.29, whereas SDM's P/E ratio is 26.43. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to SDM's ROE of -4.93%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to SDM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check SDM's competition here

Fluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLNT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 77.5M. In comparison, ADTHW has a market cap of 43.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $4.04 on the NASDAQ, while ADTHW trades at $0.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -5.29, whereas ADTHW's P/E ratio is -23.41. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to ADTHW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to ADTHW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check ADTHW's competition here

Fluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLNT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 77.5M. In comparison, TZUP has a market cap of 42.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $4.04 on the NASDAQ, while TZUP trades at $4.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -5.29, whereas TZUP's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to TZUP's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to TZUP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check TZUP's competition here

Fluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLNT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 77.5M. In comparison, ABLVW has a market cap of 40.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $4.04 on the NASDAQ, while ABLVW trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -5.29, whereas ABLVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to ABLVW's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to ABLVW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check ABLVW's competition here

Fluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLNT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 77.5M. In comparison, GSMG has a market cap of 40.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $4.04 on the NASDAQ, while GSMG trades at $0.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -5.29, whereas GSMG's P/E ratio is 1.16. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to GSMG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is less volatile compared to GSMG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check GSMG's competition here

Fluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLNT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 77.5M. In comparison, SWAG has a market cap of 36.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $4.04 on the NASDAQ, while SWAG trades at $1.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -5.29, whereas SWAG's P/E ratio is -98.00. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to SWAG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to SWAG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check SWAG's competition here

Fluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLNT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 77.5M. In comparison, MOXC has a market cap of 35.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $4.04 on the NASDAQ, while MOXC trades at $1.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -5.29, whereas MOXC's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to MOXC's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to MOXC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check MOXC's competition here

Fluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLNT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 77.5M. In comparison, SWAGW has a market cap of 30.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $4.04 on the NASDAQ, while SWAGW trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -5.29, whereas SWAGW's P/E ratio is 0.35. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to SWAGW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to SWAGW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check SWAGW's competition here

Fluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLNT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 77.5M. In comparison, ACCS has a market cap of 26.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $4.04 on the NASDAQ, while ACCS trades at $6.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -5.29, whereas ACCS's P/E ratio is 10.91. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to ACCS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to ACCS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check ACCS's competition here

Fluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLNT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 77.5M. In comparison, CDLX has a market cap of 21.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $4.04 on the NASDAQ, while CDLX trades at $3.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -5.29, whereas CDLX's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to CDLX's ROE of +12.85%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to CDLX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check CDLX's competition here

Fluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLNT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 77.5M. In comparison, TJGC has a market cap of 18.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $4.04 on the NASDAQ, while TJGC trades at $3.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -5.29, whereas TJGC's P/E ratio is -3.41. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to TJGC's ROE of -1.92%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to TJGC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check TJGC's competition here

Fluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLNT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 77.5M. In comparison, HHS has a market cap of 16.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $4.04 on the NASDAQ, while HHS trades at $2.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -5.29, whereas HHS's P/E ratio is -16.29. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to HHS's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to HHS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check HHS's competition here

Fluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLNT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 77.5M. In comparison, MCTR has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $4.04 on the NASDAQ, while MCTR trades at $0.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -5.29, whereas MCTR's P/E ratio is -3.76. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to MCTR's ROE of -1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to MCTR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check MCTR's competition here

Fluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLNT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 77.5M. In comparison, DLPN has a market cap of 14.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $4.04 on the NASDAQ, while DLPN trades at $1.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -5.29, whereas DLPN's P/E ratio is -3.79. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to DLPN's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to DLPN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check DLPN's competition here

Fluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLNT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 77.5M. In comparison, ISIG has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $4.04 on the NASDAQ, while ISIG trades at $7.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -5.29, whereas ISIG's P/E ratio is 1.19. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to ISIG's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to ISIG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check ISIG's competition here

Fluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLNT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 77.5M. In comparison, DMS has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $4.04 on the NASDAQ, while DMS trades at $2.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -5.29, whereas DMS's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to DMS's ROE of +2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is less volatile compared to DMS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check DMS's competition here

Fluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLNT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 77.5M. In comparison, LDWY has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $4.04 on the NASDAQ, while LDWY trades at $3.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -5.29, whereas LDWY's P/E ratio is -2.70. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to LDWY's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to LDWY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check LDWY's competition here

Fluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLNT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 77.5M. In comparison, EDHL has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $4.04 on the NASDAQ, while EDHL trades at $4.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -5.29, whereas EDHL's P/E ratio is -2.97. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to EDHL's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to EDHL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check EDHL's competition here

Fluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLNT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 77.5M. In comparison, DRCTW has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $4.04 on the NASDAQ, while DRCTW trades at $0.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -5.29, whereas DRCTW's P/E ratio is 0.16. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to DRCTW's ROE of +4.79%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to DRCTW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check DRCTW's competition here

Fluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLNT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 77.5M. In comparison, FTRK has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $4.04 on the NASDAQ, while FTRK trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -5.29, whereas FTRK's P/E ratio is -3.77. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to FTRK's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to FTRK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check FTRK's competition here

Fluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLNT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 77.5M. In comparison, TULP has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $4.04 on the NASDAQ, while TULP trades at $3.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -5.29, whereas TULP's P/E ratio is -1.98. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to TULP's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to TULP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check TULP's competition here

Fluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLNT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 77.5M. In comparison, YDKG has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $4.04 on the NASDAQ, while YDKG trades at $1.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -5.29, whereas YDKG's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to YDKG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to YDKG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check YDKG's competition here

Fluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLNT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 77.5M. In comparison, KRKR has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $4.04 on the NASDAQ, while KRKR trades at $3.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -5.29, whereas KRKR's P/E ratio is -1.28. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to KRKR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to KRKR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check KRKR's competition here

Fluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLNT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 77.5M. In comparison, CNET has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $4.04 on the NASDAQ, while CNET trades at $1.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -5.29, whereas CNET's P/E ratio is -3.31. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to CNET's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to CNET. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check CNET's competition here

Fluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLNT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 77.5M. In comparison, UBXG has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $4.04 on the NASDAQ, while UBXG trades at $5.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -5.29, whereas UBXG's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to UBXG's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to UBXG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check UBXG's competition here

Fluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLNT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 77.5M. In comparison, MGOL has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $4.04 on the NASDAQ, while MGOL trades at $0.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -5.29, whereas MGOL's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to MGOL's ROE of -21.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is less volatile compared to MGOL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check MGOL's competition here

Fluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLNT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 77.5M. In comparison, VSME has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $4.04 on the NASDAQ, while VSME trades at $1.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -5.29, whereas VSME's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to VSME's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to VSME. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check VSME's competition here

Fluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLNT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 77.5M. In comparison, STRNW has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $4.04 on the NASDAQ, while STRNW trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -5.29, whereas STRNW's P/E ratio is -39.93. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to STRNW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is less volatile compared to STRNW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check STRNW's competition here

Fluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLNT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 77.5M. In comparison, DRCT has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $4.04 on the NASDAQ, while DRCT trades at $2.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -5.29, whereas DRCT's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to DRCT's ROE of +4.79%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to DRCT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check DRCT's competition here

Fluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLNT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 77.5M. In comparison, ADVWW has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $4.04 on the NASDAQ, while ADVWW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -5.29, whereas ADVWW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to ADVWW's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is less volatile compared to ADVWW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check ADVWW's competition here

Fluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLNT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 77.5M. In comparison, KUST has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $4.04 on the NASDAQ, while KUST trades at $1.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -5.29, whereas KUST's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to KUST's ROE of -2.54%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to KUST. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check KUST's competition here

Fluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLNT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 77.5M. In comparison, STFS has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $4.04 on the NASDAQ, while STFS trades at $3.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -5.29, whereas STFS's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to STFS's ROE of -1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to STFS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check STFS's competition here

Fluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLNT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 77.5M. In comparison, BAOS has a market cap of 999.4K. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $4.04 on the NASDAQ, while BAOS trades at $0.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -5.29, whereas BAOS's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to BAOS's ROE of -1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is less volatile compared to BAOS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check BAOS's competition here

Fluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLNT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 77.5M. In comparison, TRKAW has a market cap of 529.8K. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $4.04 on the NASDAQ, while TRKAW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -5.29, whereas TRKAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to TRKAW's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is less volatile compared to TRKAW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check TRKAW's competition here

Fluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLNT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 77.5M. In comparison, TBLAW has a market cap of 109.3K. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $4.04 on the NASDAQ, while TBLAW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -5.29, whereas TBLAW's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to TBLAW's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is less volatile compared to TBLAW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check TBLAW's competition here

Fluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLNT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 77.5M. In comparison, MOBQW has a market cap of 44.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $4.04 on the NASDAQ, while MOBQW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -5.29, whereas MOBQW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to MOBQW's ROE of -7.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to MOBQW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check MOBQW's competition here

Fluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLNT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 77.5M. In comparison, GSMGW has a market cap of 9.3K. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $4.04 on the NASDAQ, while GSMGW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -5.29, whereas GSMGW's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to GSMGW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is less volatile compared to GSMGW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check GSMGW's competition here

Fluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLNT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 77.5M. In comparison, HAO has a market cap of 9.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $4.04 on the NASDAQ, while HAO trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -5.29, whereas HAO's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to HAO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to HAO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check HAO's competition here

Fluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLNT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 77.5M. In comparison, SZMK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $4.04 on the NASDAQ, while SZMK trades at $3.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -5.29, whereas SZMK's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to SZMK's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to SZMK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check SZMK's competition here

Fluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLNT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 77.5M. In comparison, DMS-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $4.04 on the NASDAQ, while DMS-WT trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -5.29, whereas DMS-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to DMS-WT's ROE of +2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to DMS-WT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check DMS-WT's competition here

Fluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLNT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 77.5M. In comparison, TRKA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $4.04 on the NASDAQ, while TRKA trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -5.29, whereas TRKA's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to TRKA's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is less volatile compared to TRKA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check TRKA's competition here

Fluent, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLNT) plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLNT stands at 77.5M. In comparison, ZDVSV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLNT is priced at $4.04 on the NASDAQ, while ZDVSV trades at $123.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLNT currently has a P/E ratio of -5.29, whereas ZDVSV's P/E ratio is 27.03. In terms of profitability, FLNT's ROE is -1.34%, compared to ZDVSV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLNT is more volatile compared to ZDVSV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLNT.Check ZDVSV's competition here