Conversus StepStone Private Markets Class S (NASDAQ: XPMSX) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See XPMSX's competitors and their performance on the NASDAQ and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Investment - Banking & Investment Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for XPMSX and its NASDAQ peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XPMSX | $62.48 | +0.45% | 1.3B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| FUSVX | $95.27 | -0.63% | 157B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| IBKR | $87.99 | -2.75% | 152B | 35.06 | $2.51 | +0.37% |
| BNY | $156.33 | +0.16% | 107.3B | 33.27 | $4.70 | +1.42% |
| BK | $141.91 | -0.48% | 97.4B | 17.61 | $8.06 | +1.56% |
| SF | $82.91 | +0.34% | 12.6B | 12.09 | $6.86 | +1.74% |
| VOYA | $99.43 | -0.84% | 9B | 10.99 | $9.05 | +1.87% |
| HLI | $125.49 | -2.22% | 8.8B | 16.62 | $7.55 | +2.00% |
| VOYA-PB | $23.71 | +0.25% | 7.2B | 3.02 | $7.87 | +1.87% |
| MGR | $20.17 | -0.44% | 5.9B | 0.89 | $22.72 | +7.26% |
Stock Comparison
Fidelity 500 Index Premium (NASDAQ: FUSVX)
XPMSX vs FUSVX Comparison August 2026
Conversus StepStone Private Markets Class S (NASDAQ: XPMSX) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XPMSX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FUSVX has a market cap of 157B. Regarding current trading prices, XPMSX is priced at $62.48 on the NASDAQ, while FUSVX trades at $95.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XPMSX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FUSVX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XPMSX's ROE is N/A, compared to FUSVX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XPMSX is not fully comparable compared to FUSVX. This indicates unavailable risk data in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPMSX.Check FUSVX's competition here
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: IBKR)
XPMSX vs IBKR Comparison August 2026
Conversus StepStone Private Markets Class S (NASDAQ: XPMSX) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XPMSX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, IBKR has a market cap of 152B. Regarding current trading prices, XPMSX is priced at $62.48 on the NASDAQ, while IBKR trades at $87.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XPMSX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBKR's P/E ratio is 35.06. In terms of profitability, XPMSX's ROE is N/A, compared to IBKR's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, XPMSX is less volatile compared to IBKR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPMSX.Check IBKR's competition here
Bank of New York Mellon Corp (NYSE: BNY)
XPMSX vs BNY Comparison August 2026
Conversus StepStone Private Markets Class S (NASDAQ: XPMSX) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XPMSX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BNY has a market cap of 107.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XPMSX is priced at $62.48 on the NASDAQ, while BNY trades at $156.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XPMSX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNY's P/E ratio is 33.27. In terms of profitability, XPMSX's ROE is N/A, compared to BNY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, XPMSX is less volatile compared to BNY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPMSX.Check BNY's competition here
The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (NYSE: BK)
XPMSX vs BK Comparison August 2026
Conversus StepStone Private Markets Class S (NASDAQ: XPMSX) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XPMSX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BK has a market cap of 97.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XPMSX is priced at $62.48 on the NASDAQ, while BK trades at $141.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XPMSX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BK's P/E ratio is 17.61. In terms of profitability, XPMSX's ROE is N/A, compared to BK's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, XPMSX is less volatile compared to BK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPMSX.Check BK's competition here
Stifel Financial Corp (NYSE: SF)
XPMSX vs SF Comparison August 2026
Conversus StepStone Private Markets Class S (NASDAQ: XPMSX) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XPMSX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SF has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XPMSX is priced at $62.48 on the NASDAQ, while SF trades at $82.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XPMSX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SF's P/E ratio is 12.09. In terms of profitability, XPMSX's ROE is N/A, compared to SF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, XPMSX is less volatile compared to SF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPMSX.Check SF's competition here
Voya Financial, Inc. (NYSE: VOYA)
XPMSX vs VOYA Comparison August 2026
Conversus StepStone Private Markets Class S (NASDAQ: XPMSX) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XPMSX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, VOYA has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, XPMSX is priced at $62.48 on the NASDAQ, while VOYA trades at $99.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XPMSX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VOYA's P/E ratio is 10.99. In terms of profitability, XPMSX's ROE is N/A, compared to VOYA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, XPMSX is less volatile compared to VOYA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPMSX.Check VOYA's competition here
Houlihan Lokey, Inc. (NYSE: HLI)
XPMSX vs HLI Comparison August 2026
Conversus StepStone Private Markets Class S (NASDAQ: XPMSX) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XPMSX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HLI has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XPMSX is priced at $62.48 on the NASDAQ, while HLI trades at $125.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XPMSX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLI's P/E ratio is 16.62. In terms of profitability, XPMSX's ROE is N/A, compared to HLI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, XPMSX is less volatile compared to HLI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPMSX.Check HLI's competition here
Voya Financial, Inc. (NYSE: VOYA-PB)
XPMSX vs VOYA-PB Comparison August 2026
Conversus StepStone Private Markets Class S (NASDAQ: XPMSX) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XPMSX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, VOYA-PB has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XPMSX is priced at $62.48 on the NASDAQ, while VOYA-PB trades at $23.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XPMSX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VOYA-PB's P/E ratio is 3.02. In terms of profitability, XPMSX's ROE is N/A, compared to VOYA-PB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, XPMSX is less volatile compared to VOYA-PB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPMSX.Check VOYA-PB's competition here
Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. (NYSE: MGR)
XPMSX vs MGR Comparison August 2026
Conversus StepStone Private Markets Class S (NASDAQ: XPMSX) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XPMSX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MGR has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XPMSX is priced at $62.48 on the NASDAQ, while MGR trades at $20.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XPMSX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGR's P/E ratio is 0.89. In terms of profitability, XPMSX's ROE is N/A, compared to MGR's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, XPMSX is less volatile compared to MGR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPMSX.Check MGR's competition here
Cliffwater Enhanced Lending Fund (NASDAQ: CELFX)
XPMSX vs CELFX Comparison August 2026
Conversus StepStone Private Markets Class S (NASDAQ: XPMSX) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XPMSX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CELFX has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XPMSX is priced at $62.48 on the NASDAQ, while CELFX trades at $10.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XPMSX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CELFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XPMSX's ROE is N/A, compared to CELFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XPMSX is similarly volatile compared to CELFX. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPMSX.Check CELFX's competition here
Piper Sandler Companies (NYSE: PIPR)
XPMSX vs PIPR Comparison August 2026
Conversus StepStone Private Markets Class S (NASDAQ: XPMSX) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XPMSX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PIPR has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XPMSX is priced at $62.48 on the NASDAQ, while PIPR trades at $75.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XPMSX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PIPR's P/E ratio is 7.99. In terms of profitability, XPMSX's ROE is N/A, compared to PIPR's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, XPMSX is less volatile compared to PIPR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPMSX.Check PIPR's competition here
PJT Partners Inc. (NYSE: PJT)
XPMSX vs PJT Comparison August 2026
Conversus StepStone Private Markets Class S (NASDAQ: XPMSX) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XPMSX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PJT has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XPMSX is priced at $62.48 on the NASDAQ, while PJT trades at $168.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XPMSX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PJT's P/E ratio is 22.52. In terms of profitability, XPMSX's ROE is N/A, compared to PJT's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, XPMSX is less volatile compared to PJT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPMSX.Check PJT's competition here
Webull Corporation Warrants (NASDAQ: BULLW)
XPMSX vs BULLW Comparison August 2026
Conversus StepStone Private Markets Class S (NASDAQ: XPMSX) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XPMSX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BULLW has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XPMSX is priced at $62.48 on the NASDAQ, while BULLW trades at $2.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XPMSX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BULLW's P/E ratio is 50.36. In terms of profitability, XPMSX's ROE is N/A, compared to BULLW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, XPMSX is less volatile compared to BULLW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPMSX.Check BULLW's competition here
Abacus Global Management, Inc. - 9.875% Fixed Rate Senior Notes due 2028 (NYSE: ABXL)
XPMSX vs ABXL Comparison August 2026
Conversus StepStone Private Markets Class S (NASDAQ: XPMSX) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XPMSX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ABXL has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XPMSX is priced at $62.48 on the NASDAQ, while ABXL trades at $25.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XPMSX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABXL's P/E ratio is 325.22. In terms of profitability, XPMSX's ROE is N/A, compared to ABXL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, XPMSX is less volatile compared to ABXL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPMSX.Check ABXL's competition here
Brookfield Oaktree Holdings, LLC 6.625 % Non-Cum Red Perp Pfd Units Series A (NYSE: OAK-PA)
XPMSX vs OAK-PA Comparison August 2026
Conversus StepStone Private Markets Class S (NASDAQ: XPMSX) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XPMSX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, OAK-PA has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XPMSX is priced at $62.48 on the NASDAQ, while OAK-PA trades at $20.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XPMSX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OAK-PA's P/E ratio is 9.15. In terms of profitability, XPMSX's ROE is N/A, compared to OAK-PA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, XPMSX is less volatile compared to OAK-PA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPMSX.Check OAK-PA's competition here
Oaktree Capital Group, LLC (NYSE: OAK-PB)
XPMSX vs OAK-PB Comparison August 2026
Conversus StepStone Private Markets Class S (NASDAQ: XPMSX) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XPMSX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, OAK-PB has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XPMSX is priced at $62.48 on the NASDAQ, while OAK-PB trades at $20.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XPMSX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OAK-PB's P/E ratio is 9.04. In terms of profitability, XPMSX's ROE is N/A, compared to OAK-PB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, XPMSX is less volatile compared to OAK-PB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPMSX.Check OAK-PB's competition here
Stifel Financial Corporation 5.20% Senior Notes due 2047 (NYSE: SFB)
XPMSX vs SFB Comparison August 2026
Conversus StepStone Private Markets Class S (NASDAQ: XPMSX) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XPMSX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SFB has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, XPMSX is priced at $62.48 on the NASDAQ, while SFB trades at $19.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XPMSX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFB's P/E ratio is 2.96. In terms of profitability, XPMSX's ROE is N/A, compared to SFB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, XPMSX is less volatile compared to SFB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPMSX.Check SFB's competition here
Trinity Capital Inc. - 7.00% No (NASDAQ: TRINL)
XPMSX vs TRINL Comparison August 2026
Conversus StepStone Private Markets Class S (NASDAQ: XPMSX) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XPMSX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TRINL has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, XPMSX is priced at $62.48 on the NASDAQ, while TRINL trades at $25.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XPMSX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRINL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XPMSX's ROE is N/A, compared to TRINL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, XPMSX is less volatile compared to TRINL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPMSX.Check TRINL's competition here
Carlyle Secured Lending, Inc. 8.20% Notes due 2028 (NASDAQ: CGBDL)
XPMSX vs CGBDL Comparison August 2026
Conversus StepStone Private Markets Class S (NASDAQ: XPMSX) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XPMSX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CGBDL has a market cap of 990.1M. Regarding current trading prices, XPMSX is priced at $62.48 on the NASDAQ, while CGBDL trades at $25.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XPMSX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGBDL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XPMSX's ROE is N/A, compared to CGBDL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, XPMSX is similarly volatile compared to CGBDL. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPMSX.Check CGBDL's competition here
Ridgepost Capital Inc (NYSE: PX)
XPMSX vs PX Comparison August 2026
Conversus StepStone Private Markets Class S (NASDAQ: XPMSX) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XPMSX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PX has a market cap of 829.7M. Regarding current trading prices, XPMSX is priced at $62.48 on the NASDAQ, while PX trades at $7.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XPMSX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PX's P/E ratio is 58.08. In terms of profitability, XPMSX's ROE is N/A, compared to PX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XPMSX is less volatile compared to PX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPMSX.Check PX's competition here
Great Elm Group, Inc. 7.25% Notes due 2027 (NASDAQ: GEGGL)
XPMSX vs GEGGL Comparison August 2026
Conversus StepStone Private Markets Class S (NASDAQ: XPMSX) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XPMSX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GEGGL has a market cap of 718.3M. Regarding current trading prices, XPMSX is priced at $62.48 on the NASDAQ, while GEGGL trades at $24.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XPMSX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEGGL's P/E ratio is -29.59. In terms of profitability, XPMSX's ROE is N/A, compared to GEGGL's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, XPMSX is less volatile compared to GEGGL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPMSX.Check GEGGL's competition here
Compass Diversified (NYSE: CODI-PB)
XPMSX vs CODI-PB Comparison August 2026
Conversus StepStone Private Markets Class S (NASDAQ: XPMSX) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XPMSX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CODI-PB has a market cap of 647.5M. Regarding current trading prices, XPMSX is priced at $62.48 on the NASDAQ, while CODI-PB trades at $22.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XPMSX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CODI-PB's P/E ratio is -226.30. In terms of profitability, XPMSX's ROE is N/A, compared to CODI-PB's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, XPMSX is less volatile compared to CODI-PB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPMSX.Check CODI-PB's competition here
Gladstone Capital Corporation 7.75% Notes due 2028 (NASDAQ: GLADZ)
XPMSX vs GLADZ Comparison August 2026
Conversus StepStone Private Markets Class S (NASDAQ: XPMSX) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XPMSX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GLADZ has a market cap of 563.3M. Regarding current trading prices, XPMSX is priced at $62.48 on the NASDAQ, while GLADZ trades at $25.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XPMSX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLADZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XPMSX's ROE is N/A, compared to GLADZ's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, XPMSX is less volatile compared to GLADZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPMSX.Check GLADZ's competition here
Raymond James Financial Inc (NYSE: RJF-PB)
XPMSX vs RJF-PB Comparison August 2026
Conversus StepStone Private Markets Class S (NASDAQ: XPMSX) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XPMSX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, RJF-PB has a market cap of 459.5M. Regarding current trading prices, XPMSX is priced at $62.48 on the NASDAQ, while RJF-PB trades at $2.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XPMSX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RJF-PB's P/E ratio is 0.33. In terms of profitability, XPMSX's ROE is N/A, compared to RJF-PB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, XPMSX is less volatile compared to RJF-PB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPMSX.Check RJF-PB's competition here
Primark Private Equity Investments Fund (NASDAQ: PMPEX)
XPMSX vs PMPEX Comparison August 2026
Conversus StepStone Private Markets Class S (NASDAQ: XPMSX) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XPMSX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PMPEX has a market cap of 418M. Regarding current trading prices, XPMSX is priced at $62.48 on the NASDAQ, while PMPEX trades at $17.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XPMSX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMPEX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XPMSX's ROE is N/A, compared to PMPEX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XPMSX is similarly volatile compared to PMPEX. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPMSX.Check PMPEX's competition here
Saratoga Investment Corp 8.50% (NYSE: SAZ)
XPMSX vs SAZ Comparison August 2026
Conversus StepStone Private Markets Class S (NASDAQ: XPMSX) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XPMSX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SAZ has a market cap of 307.7M. Regarding current trading prices, XPMSX is priced at $62.48 on the NASDAQ, while SAZ trades at $25.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XPMSX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAZ's P/E ratio is 19.10. In terms of profitability, XPMSX's ROE is N/A, compared to SAZ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, XPMSX is less volatile compared to SAZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPMSX.Check SAZ's competition here
Saratoga Investment Corp 8.00% (NYSE: SAJ)
XPMSX vs SAJ Comparison August 2026
Conversus StepStone Private Markets Class S (NASDAQ: XPMSX) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XPMSX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SAJ has a market cap of 307.6M. Regarding current trading prices, XPMSX is priced at $62.48 on the NASDAQ, while SAJ trades at $25.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XPMSX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAJ's P/E ratio is 19.25. In terms of profitability, XPMSX's ROE is N/A, compared to SAJ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, XPMSX is less volatile compared to SAJ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPMSX.Check SAJ's competition here
BRC Group Holdings Inc. 5.25% Sr. Notes due 2028 (NASDAQ: RILYZ)
XPMSX vs RILYZ Comparison August 2026
Conversus StepStone Private Markets Class S (NASDAQ: XPMSX) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XPMSX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, RILYZ has a market cap of 284.8M. Regarding current trading prices, XPMSX is priced at $62.48 on the NASDAQ, while RILYZ trades at $19.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XPMSX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RILYZ's P/E ratio is 2.65. In terms of profitability, XPMSX's ROE is N/A, compared to RILYZ's ROE of -2.63%. Regarding short-term risk, XPMSX is less volatile compared to RILYZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPMSX.Check RILYZ's competition here
Chaince Digital Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: CD)
XPMSX vs CD Comparison August 2026
Conversus StepStone Private Markets Class S (NASDAQ: XPMSX) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XPMSX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CD has a market cap of 221.6M. Regarding current trading prices, XPMSX is priced at $62.48 on the NASDAQ, while CD trades at $2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XPMSX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CD's P/E ratio is 4.04. In terms of profitability, XPMSX's ROE is N/A, compared to CD's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, XPMSX is less volatile compared to CD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPMSX.Check CD's competition here
WisdomTree European Opportunities Fund (AMEX: OPPE)
XPMSX vs OPPE Comparison August 2026
Conversus StepStone Private Markets Class S (NASDAQ: XPMSX) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XPMSX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, OPPE has a market cap of 168.9M. Regarding current trading prices, XPMSX is priced at $62.48 on the NASDAQ, while OPPE trades at $59.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XPMSX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OPPE's P/E ratio is 16.53. In terms of profitability, XPMSX's ROE is N/A, compared to OPPE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XPMSX is less volatile compared to OPPE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPMSX.Check OPPE's competition here
WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. 7.875% Notes due 2028 (NASDAQ: WHFCL)
XPMSX vs WHFCL Comparison August 2026
Conversus StepStone Private Markets Class S (NASDAQ: XPMSX) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XPMSX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, WHFCL has a market cap of 136.9M. Regarding current trading prices, XPMSX is priced at $62.48 on the NASDAQ, while WHFCL trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XPMSX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WHFCL's P/E ratio is 61.28. In terms of profitability, XPMSX's ROE is N/A, compared to WHFCL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, XPMSX is less volatile compared to WHFCL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPMSX.Check WHFCL's competition here
Great Elm Capital Corp. 8.75% Notes due 2028 (NASDAQ: GECCZ)
XPMSX vs GECCZ Comparison August 2026
Conversus StepStone Private Markets Class S (NASDAQ: XPMSX) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XPMSX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GECCZ has a market cap of 125.4M. Regarding current trading prices, XPMSX is priced at $62.48 on the NASDAQ, while GECCZ trades at $25.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XPMSX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GECCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XPMSX's ROE is N/A, compared to GECCZ's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, XPMSX is less volatile compared to GECCZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPMSX.Check GECCZ's competition here
ATIF Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: AUC)
XPMSX vs AUC Comparison August 2026
Conversus StepStone Private Markets Class S (NASDAQ: XPMSX) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XPMSX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AUC has a market cap of 70.1M. Regarding current trading prices, XPMSX is priced at $62.48 on the NASDAQ, while AUC trades at $7.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XPMSX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUC's P/E ratio is -3.02. In terms of profitability, XPMSX's ROE is N/A, compared to AUC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XPMSX is less volatile compared to AUC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPMSX.Check AUC's competition here
iShares Factors US Small Blend Style ETF (NASDAQ: STSB)
XPMSX vs STSB Comparison August 2026
Conversus StepStone Private Markets Class S (NASDAQ: XPMSX) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XPMSX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, STSB has a market cap of 15.1M. Regarding current trading prices, XPMSX is priced at $62.48 on the NASDAQ, while STSB trades at $21.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XPMSX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STSB's P/E ratio is 24.06. In terms of profitability, XPMSX's ROE is N/A, compared to STSB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XPMSX is similarly volatile compared to STSB. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPMSX.Check STSB's competition here
Magic Empire Global Limited (NASDAQ: MEGL)
XPMSX vs MEGL Comparison August 2026
Conversus StepStone Private Markets Class S (NASDAQ: XPMSX) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XPMSX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MEGL has a market cap of 9.8M. Regarding current trading prices, XPMSX is priced at $62.48 on the NASDAQ, while MEGL trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XPMSX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MEGL's P/E ratio is -12.73. In terms of profitability, XPMSX's ROE is N/A, compared to MEGL's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, XPMSX is less volatile compared to MEGL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPMSX.Check MEGL's competition here
ATIF Holdings Ltd. (NASDAQ: ZBAI)
XPMSX vs ZBAI Comparison August 2026
Conversus StepStone Private Markets Class S (NASDAQ: XPMSX) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XPMSX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ZBAI has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, XPMSX is priced at $62.48 on the NASDAQ, while ZBAI trades at $8.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XPMSX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZBAI's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, XPMSX's ROE is N/A, compared to ZBAI's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, XPMSX is less volatile compared to ZBAI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPMSX.Check ZBAI's competition here
AMTD IDEA Group (NYSE: AMTD)
XPMSX vs AMTD Comparison August 2026
Conversus StepStone Private Markets Class S (NASDAQ: XPMSX) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XPMSX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AMTD has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, XPMSX is priced at $62.48 on the NASDAQ, while AMTD trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XPMSX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMTD's P/E ratio is 0.19. In terms of profitability, XPMSX's ROE is N/A, compared to AMTD's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, XPMSX is less volatile compared to AMTD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPMSX.Check AMTD's competition here
Bitcoin Depot Inc. (NASDAQ: BTMWW)
XPMSX vs BTMWW Comparison August 2026
Conversus StepStone Private Markets Class S (NASDAQ: XPMSX) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XPMSX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BTMWW has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, XPMSX is priced at $62.48 on the NASDAQ, while BTMWW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XPMSX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTMWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XPMSX's ROE is N/A, compared to BTMWW's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, XPMSX is similarly volatile compared to BTMWW. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPMSX.Check BTMWW's competition here
2x Daily Software Platform ETF (AMEX: SOFL)
XPMSX vs SOFL Comparison August 2026
Conversus StepStone Private Markets Class S (NASDAQ: XPMSX) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XPMSX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SOFL has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, XPMSX is priced at $62.48 on the NASDAQ, while SOFL trades at $22.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XPMSX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOFL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XPMSX's ROE is N/A, compared to SOFL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XPMSX is less volatile compared to SOFL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPMSX.Check SOFL's competition here
Aurelion Inc. (NASDAQ: AURE)
XPMSX vs AURE Comparison August 2026
Conversus StepStone Private Markets Class S (NASDAQ: XPMSX) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XPMSX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AURE has a market cap of 541.1K. Regarding current trading prices, XPMSX is priced at $62.48 on the NASDAQ, while AURE trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XPMSX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AURE's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, XPMSX's ROE is N/A, compared to AURE's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, XPMSX is less volatile compared to AURE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPMSX.Check AURE's competition here
Cowen Inc. - 7.75% Senior Notes (NASDAQ: COWNL)
XPMSX vs COWNL Comparison August 2026
Conversus StepStone Private Markets Class S (NASDAQ: XPMSX) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XPMSX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, COWNL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, XPMSX is priced at $62.48 on the NASDAQ, while COWNL trades at $25.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XPMSX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COWNL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XPMSX's ROE is N/A, compared to COWNL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, XPMSX is less volatile compared to COWNL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPMSX.Check COWNL's competition here
Blackstone / GSO Floating Rate Enhanced Income Fund (NASDAQ: BGFLX)
XPMSX vs BGFLX Comparison August 2026
Conversus StepStone Private Markets Class S (NASDAQ: XPMSX) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XPMSX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BGFLX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, XPMSX is priced at $62.48 on the NASDAQ, while BGFLX trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XPMSX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BGFLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XPMSX's ROE is N/A, compared to BGFLX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XPMSX is similarly volatile compared to BGFLX. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPMSX.Check BGFLX's competition here
Fidelity Municipal Trust II - Fidelity Michigan Municipal Money Market Fund (NASDAQ: FMIXX)
XPMSX vs FMIXX Comparison August 2026
Conversus StepStone Private Markets Class S (NASDAQ: XPMSX) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XPMSX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FMIXX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, XPMSX is priced at $62.48 on the NASDAQ, while FMIXX trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XPMSX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMIXX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XPMSX's ROE is N/A, compared to FMIXX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XPMSX is similarly volatile compared to FMIXX. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPMSX.Check FMIXX's competition here
NorthStar Asset Management Group (NYSE: NSAM)
XPMSX vs NSAM Comparison August 2026
Conversus StepStone Private Markets Class S (NASDAQ: XPMSX) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XPMSX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NSAM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, XPMSX is priced at $62.48 on the NASDAQ, while NSAM trades at $15.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XPMSX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSAM's P/E ratio is 40.06. In terms of profitability, XPMSX's ROE is N/A, compared to NSAM's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, XPMSX is less volatile compared to NSAM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPMSX.Check NSAM's competition here
STRATS Trust for United States Cellular Corp. Securities, Series 2004-6 STRATS 6.375 (NYSE: GJH)
XPMSX vs GJH Comparison August 2026
Conversus StepStone Private Markets Class S (NASDAQ: XPMSX) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XPMSX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GJH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, XPMSX is priced at $62.48 on the NASDAQ, while GJH trades at $9.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XPMSX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GJH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XPMSX's ROE is N/A, compared to GJH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XPMSX is similarly volatile compared to GJH. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPMSX.Check GJH's competition here
YieldShares High Income ETF (AMEX: SNDS)
XPMSX vs SNDS Comparison August 2026
Conversus StepStone Private Markets Class S (NASDAQ: XPMSX) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XPMSX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SNDS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, XPMSX is priced at $62.48 on the NASDAQ, while SNDS trades at $21.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XPMSX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNDS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XPMSX's ROE is N/A, compared to SNDS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XPMSX is less volatile compared to SNDS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPMSX.Check SNDS's competition here