Trinity Capital Inc. - 7.00% No (NASDAQ: TRINL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See TRINL's competitors and their performance on the NASDAQ and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Investment - Banking & Investment Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for TRINL and its NASDAQ peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRINL | $25.07 | -0.24% | 1B | N/A | N/A | +11.19% |
| FUSVX | $95.27 | -0.63% | 157B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| IBKR | $88.63 | +1.00% | 153.2B | 35.31 | $2.51 | +0.37% |
| BNY | $156.82 | +0.40% | 107.6B | 33.36 | $4.70 | +1.41% |
| BK | $141.91 | -0.48% | 97.4B | 17.61 | $8.06 | +1.56% |
| SF | $84.05 | +0.57% | 12.7B | 12.26 | $6.86 | +1.71% |
| VOYA | $100.68 | +0.61% | 9.1B | 11.14 | $9.05 | +1.85% |
| HLI | $128.25 | +2.21% | 9B | 17.00 | $7.55 | +1.94% |
| VOYA-PB | $23.66 | -0.38% | 7.2B | 3.01 | $7.87 | +1.85% |
| MGR | $20.21 | -0.30% | 6B | 0.89 | $22.72 | +7.26% |
Stock Comparison
Fidelity 500 Index Premium (NASDAQ: FUSVX)
TRINL vs FUSVX Comparison August 2026
Trinity Capital Inc. - 7.00% No (NASDAQ: TRINL) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRINL stands at 1B. In comparison, FUSVX has a market cap of 157B. Regarding current trading prices, TRINL is priced at $25.07 on the NASDAQ, while FUSVX trades at $95.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRINL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FUSVX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRINL's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FUSVX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRINL is not fully comparable compared to FUSVX. This indicates unavailable risk data in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRINL.Check FUSVX's competition here
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: IBKR)
TRINL vs IBKR Comparison August 2026
Trinity Capital Inc. - 7.00% No (NASDAQ: TRINL) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRINL stands at 1B. In comparison, IBKR has a market cap of 153.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRINL is priced at $25.07 on the NASDAQ, while IBKR trades at $88.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRINL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBKR's P/E ratio is 35.31. In terms of profitability, TRINL's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IBKR's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TRINL is less volatile compared to IBKR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRINL.Check IBKR's competition here
Bank of New York Mellon Corp (NYSE: BNY)
TRINL vs BNY Comparison August 2026
Trinity Capital Inc. - 7.00% No (NASDAQ: TRINL) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRINL stands at 1B. In comparison, BNY has a market cap of 107.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRINL is priced at $25.07 on the NASDAQ, while BNY trades at $156.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRINL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNY's P/E ratio is 33.36. In terms of profitability, TRINL's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BNY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TRINL is more volatile compared to BNY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRINL.Check BNY's competition here
The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (NYSE: BK)
TRINL vs BK Comparison August 2026
Trinity Capital Inc. - 7.00% No (NASDAQ: TRINL) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRINL stands at 1B. In comparison, BK has a market cap of 97.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRINL is priced at $25.07 on the NASDAQ, while BK trades at $141.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRINL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BK's P/E ratio is 17.61. In terms of profitability, TRINL's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TRINL is less volatile compared to BK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRINL.Check BK's competition here
Stifel Financial Corp (NYSE: SF)
TRINL vs SF Comparison August 2026
Trinity Capital Inc. - 7.00% No (NASDAQ: TRINL) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRINL stands at 1B. In comparison, SF has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRINL is priced at $25.07 on the NASDAQ, while SF trades at $84.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRINL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SF's P/E ratio is 12.26. In terms of profitability, TRINL's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TRINL is more volatile compared to SF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRINL.Check SF's competition here
Voya Financial, Inc. (NYSE: VOYA)
TRINL vs VOYA Comparison August 2026
Trinity Capital Inc. - 7.00% No (NASDAQ: TRINL) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRINL stands at 1B. In comparison, VOYA has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRINL is priced at $25.07 on the NASDAQ, while VOYA trades at $100.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRINL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VOYA's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, TRINL's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VOYA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TRINL is more volatile compared to VOYA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRINL.Check VOYA's competition here
Houlihan Lokey, Inc. (NYSE: HLI)
TRINL vs HLI Comparison August 2026
Trinity Capital Inc. - 7.00% No (NASDAQ: TRINL) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRINL stands at 1B. In comparison, HLI has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRINL is priced at $25.07 on the NASDAQ, while HLI trades at $128.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRINL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLI's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, TRINL's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HLI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TRINL is less volatile compared to HLI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRINL.Check HLI's competition here
Voya Financial, Inc. (NYSE: VOYA-PB)
TRINL vs VOYA-PB Comparison August 2026
Trinity Capital Inc. - 7.00% No (NASDAQ: TRINL) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRINL stands at 1B. In comparison, VOYA-PB has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRINL is priced at $25.07 on the NASDAQ, while VOYA-PB trades at $23.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRINL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VOYA-PB's P/E ratio is 3.01. In terms of profitability, TRINL's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VOYA-PB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TRINL is more volatile compared to VOYA-PB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRINL.Check VOYA-PB's competition here
Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. (NYSE: MGR)
TRINL vs MGR Comparison August 2026
Trinity Capital Inc. - 7.00% No (NASDAQ: TRINL) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRINL stands at 1B. In comparison, MGR has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRINL is priced at $25.07 on the NASDAQ, while MGR trades at $20.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRINL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGR's P/E ratio is 0.89. In terms of profitability, TRINL's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MGR's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TRINL is more volatile compared to MGR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRINL.Check MGR's competition here
Cliffwater Enhanced Lending Fund (NASDAQ: CELFX)
TRINL vs CELFX Comparison August 2026
Trinity Capital Inc. - 7.00% No (NASDAQ: TRINL) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRINL stands at 1B. In comparison, CELFX has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRINL is priced at $25.07 on the NASDAQ, while CELFX trades at $10.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRINL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CELFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRINL's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CELFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRINL is more volatile compared to CELFX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRINL.Check CELFX's competition here
Piper Sandler Companies (NYSE: PIPR)
TRINL vs PIPR Comparison August 2026
Trinity Capital Inc. - 7.00% No (NASDAQ: TRINL) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRINL stands at 1B. In comparison, PIPR has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRINL is priced at $25.07 on the NASDAQ, while PIPR trades at $76.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRINL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PIPR's P/E ratio is 8.02. In terms of profitability, TRINL's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PIPR's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TRINL is more volatile compared to PIPR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRINL.Check PIPR's competition here
PJT Partners Inc. (NYSE: PJT)
TRINL vs PJT Comparison August 2026
Trinity Capital Inc. - 7.00% No (NASDAQ: TRINL) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRINL stands at 1B. In comparison, PJT has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRINL is priced at $25.07 on the NASDAQ, while PJT trades at $171.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRINL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PJT's P/E ratio is 22.88. In terms of profitability, TRINL's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PJT's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, TRINL is more volatile compared to PJT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRINL.Check PJT's competition here
Webull Corporation Warrants (NASDAQ: BULLW)
TRINL vs BULLW Comparison August 2026
Trinity Capital Inc. - 7.00% No (NASDAQ: TRINL) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRINL stands at 1B. In comparison, BULLW has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRINL is priced at $25.07 on the NASDAQ, while BULLW trades at $2.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRINL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BULLW's P/E ratio is 57.55. In terms of profitability, TRINL's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BULLW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRINL is less volatile compared to BULLW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRINL.Check BULLW's competition here
Abacus Global Management, Inc. - 9.875% Fixed Rate Senior Notes due 2028 (NYSE: ABXL)
TRINL vs ABXL Comparison August 2026
Trinity Capital Inc. - 7.00% No (NASDAQ: TRINL) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRINL stands at 1B. In comparison, ABXL has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRINL is priced at $25.07 on the NASDAQ, while ABXL trades at $25.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRINL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABXL's P/E ratio is 325.22. In terms of profitability, TRINL's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ABXL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRINL is more volatile compared to ABXL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRINL.Check ABXL's competition here
Brookfield Oaktree Holdings, LLC 6.625 % Non-Cum Red Perp Pfd Units Series A (NYSE: OAK-PA)
TRINL vs OAK-PA Comparison August 2026
Trinity Capital Inc. - 7.00% No (NASDAQ: TRINL) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRINL stands at 1B. In comparison, OAK-PA has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRINL is priced at $25.07 on the NASDAQ, while OAK-PA trades at $21.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRINL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OAK-PA's P/E ratio is 9.18. In terms of profitability, TRINL's ROE is +0.15%, compared to OAK-PA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TRINL is more volatile compared to OAK-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRINL.Check OAK-PA's competition here
Oaktree Capital Group, LLC (NYSE: OAK-PB)
TRINL vs OAK-PB Comparison August 2026
Trinity Capital Inc. - 7.00% No (NASDAQ: TRINL) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRINL stands at 1B. In comparison, OAK-PB has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRINL is priced at $25.07 on the NASDAQ, while OAK-PB trades at $20.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRINL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OAK-PB's P/E ratio is 9.02. In terms of profitability, TRINL's ROE is +0.15%, compared to OAK-PB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TRINL is more volatile compared to OAK-PB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRINL.Check OAK-PB's competition here
Stifel Financial Corporation 5.20% Senior Notes due 2047 (NYSE: SFB)
TRINL vs SFB Comparison August 2026
Trinity Capital Inc. - 7.00% No (NASDAQ: TRINL) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRINL stands at 1B. In comparison, SFB has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRINL is priced at $25.07 on the NASDAQ, while SFB trades at $19.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRINL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFB's P/E ratio is 2.98. In terms of profitability, TRINL's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SFB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TRINL is more volatile compared to SFB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRINL.Check SFB's competition here
Conversus StepStone Private Markets Class S (NASDAQ: XPMSX)
TRINL vs XPMSX Comparison August 2026
Trinity Capital Inc. - 7.00% No (NASDAQ: TRINL) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRINL stands at 1B. In comparison, XPMSX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRINL is priced at $25.07 on the NASDAQ, while XPMSX trades at $62.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRINL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XPMSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRINL's ROE is +0.15%, compared to XPMSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRINL is more volatile compared to XPMSX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRINL.Check XPMSX's competition here
Carlyle Secured Lending, Inc. 8.20% Notes due 2028 (NASDAQ: CGBDL)
TRINL vs CGBDL Comparison August 2026
Trinity Capital Inc. - 7.00% No (NASDAQ: TRINL) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRINL stands at 1B. In comparison, CGBDL has a market cap of 990.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TRINL is priced at $25.07 on the NASDAQ, while CGBDL trades at $25.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRINL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGBDL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRINL's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CGBDL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRINL is more volatile compared to CGBDL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRINL.Check CGBDL's competition here
Ridgepost Capital Inc (NYSE: PX)
TRINL vs PX Comparison August 2026
Trinity Capital Inc. - 7.00% No (NASDAQ: TRINL) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRINL stands at 1B. In comparison, PX has a market cap of 829.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRINL is priced at $25.07 on the NASDAQ, while PX trades at $7.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRINL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PX's P/E ratio is 58.08. In terms of profitability, TRINL's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TRINL is less volatile compared to PX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRINL.Check PX's competition here
Great Elm Group, Inc. 7.25% Notes due 2027 (NASDAQ: GEGGL)
TRINL vs GEGGL Comparison August 2026
Trinity Capital Inc. - 7.00% No (NASDAQ: TRINL) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRINL stands at 1B. In comparison, GEGGL has a market cap of 720.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TRINL is priced at $25.07 on the NASDAQ, while GEGGL trades at $24.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRINL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEGGL's P/E ratio is -29.68. In terms of profitability, TRINL's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GEGGL's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TRINL is more volatile compared to GEGGL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRINL.Check GEGGL's competition here
Compass Diversified (NYSE: CODI-PB)
TRINL vs CODI-PB Comparison August 2026
Trinity Capital Inc. - 7.00% No (NASDAQ: TRINL) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRINL stands at 1B. In comparison, CODI-PB has a market cap of 648M. Regarding current trading prices, TRINL is priced at $25.07 on the NASDAQ, while CODI-PB trades at $22.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRINL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CODI-PB's P/E ratio is -226.50. In terms of profitability, TRINL's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CODI-PB's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, TRINL is more volatile compared to CODI-PB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRINL.Check CODI-PB's competition here
Gladstone Capital Corporation 7.75% Notes due 2028 (NASDAQ: GLADZ)
TRINL vs GLADZ Comparison August 2026
Trinity Capital Inc. - 7.00% No (NASDAQ: TRINL) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRINL stands at 1B. In comparison, GLADZ has a market cap of 563.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TRINL is priced at $25.07 on the NASDAQ, while GLADZ trades at $25.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRINL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLADZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRINL's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GLADZ's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRINL is more volatile compared to GLADZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRINL.Check GLADZ's competition here
Raymond James Financial Inc (NYSE: RJF-PB)
TRINL vs RJF-PB Comparison August 2026
Trinity Capital Inc. - 7.00% No (NASDAQ: TRINL) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRINL stands at 1B. In comparison, RJF-PB has a market cap of 459.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TRINL is priced at $25.07 on the NASDAQ, while RJF-PB trades at $2.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRINL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RJF-PB's P/E ratio is 0.33. In terms of profitability, TRINL's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RJF-PB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TRINL is more volatile compared to RJF-PB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRINL.Check RJF-PB's competition here
Primark Private Equity Investments Fund (NASDAQ: PMPEX)
TRINL vs PMPEX Comparison August 2026
Trinity Capital Inc. - 7.00% No (NASDAQ: TRINL) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRINL stands at 1B. In comparison, PMPEX has a market cap of 417.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TRINL is priced at $25.07 on the NASDAQ, while PMPEX trades at $17.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRINL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMPEX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRINL's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PMPEX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRINL is more volatile compared to PMPEX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRINL.Check PMPEX's competition here
Saratoga Investment Corp 8.50% (NYSE: SAZ)
TRINL vs SAZ Comparison August 2026
Trinity Capital Inc. - 7.00% No (NASDAQ: TRINL) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRINL stands at 1B. In comparison, SAZ has a market cap of 318.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRINL is priced at $25.07 on the NASDAQ, while SAZ trades at $25.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRINL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAZ's P/E ratio is 19.17. In terms of profitability, TRINL's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SAZ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TRINL is more volatile compared to SAZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRINL.Check SAZ's competition here
Saratoga Investment Corp 8.00% (NYSE: SAJ)
TRINL vs SAJ Comparison August 2026
Trinity Capital Inc. - 7.00% No (NASDAQ: TRINL) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRINL stands at 1B. In comparison, SAJ has a market cap of 317.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TRINL is priced at $25.07 on the NASDAQ, while SAJ trades at $25.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRINL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAJ's P/E ratio is 19.29. In terms of profitability, TRINL's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SAJ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TRINL is more volatile compared to SAJ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRINL.Check SAJ's competition here
BRC Group Holdings Inc. 5.25% Sr. Notes due 2028 (NASDAQ: RILYZ)
TRINL vs RILYZ Comparison August 2026
Trinity Capital Inc. - 7.00% No (NASDAQ: TRINL) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRINL stands at 1B. In comparison, RILYZ has a market cap of 283.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TRINL is priced at $25.07 on the NASDAQ, while RILYZ trades at $19.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRINL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RILYZ's P/E ratio is 2.62. In terms of profitability, TRINL's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RILYZ's ROE of -2.63%. Regarding short-term risk, TRINL is less volatile compared to RILYZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRINL.Check RILYZ's competition here
Chaince Digital Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: CD)
TRINL vs CD Comparison August 2026
Trinity Capital Inc. - 7.00% No (NASDAQ: TRINL) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRINL stands at 1B. In comparison, CD has a market cap of 246.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TRINL is priced at $25.07 on the NASDAQ, while CD trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRINL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CD's P/E ratio is 4.49. In terms of profitability, TRINL's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CD's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TRINL is less volatile compared to CD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRINL.Check CD's competition here
WisdomTree European Opportunities Fund (AMEX: OPPE)
TRINL vs OPPE Comparison August 2026
Trinity Capital Inc. - 7.00% No (NASDAQ: TRINL) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRINL stands at 1B. In comparison, OPPE has a market cap of 170.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TRINL is priced at $25.07 on the NASDAQ, while OPPE trades at $60.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRINL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OPPE's P/E ratio is 16.72. In terms of profitability, TRINL's ROE is +0.15%, compared to OPPE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TRINL is more volatile compared to OPPE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRINL.Check OPPE's competition here
WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. 7.875% Notes due 2028 (NASDAQ: WHFCL)
TRINL vs WHFCL Comparison August 2026
Trinity Capital Inc. - 7.00% No (NASDAQ: TRINL) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRINL stands at 1B. In comparison, WHFCL has a market cap of 140.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TRINL is priced at $25.07 on the NASDAQ, while WHFCL trades at $25.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRINL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WHFCL's P/E ratio is 61.40. In terms of profitability, TRINL's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WHFCL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TRINL is more volatile compared to WHFCL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRINL.Check WHFCL's competition here
Great Elm Capital Corp. 8.75% Notes due 2028 (NASDAQ: GECCZ)
TRINL vs GECCZ Comparison August 2026
Trinity Capital Inc. - 7.00% No (NASDAQ: TRINL) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRINL stands at 1B. In comparison, GECCZ has a market cap of 125.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TRINL is priced at $25.07 on the NASDAQ, while GECCZ trades at $25.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRINL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GECCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRINL's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GECCZ's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TRINL is more volatile compared to GECCZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRINL.Check GECCZ's competition here
ATIF Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: AUC)
TRINL vs AUC Comparison August 2026
Trinity Capital Inc. - 7.00% No (NASDAQ: TRINL) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRINL stands at 1B. In comparison, AUC has a market cap of 67M. Regarding current trading prices, TRINL is priced at $25.07 on the NASDAQ, while AUC trades at $6.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRINL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUC's P/E ratio is -2.89. In terms of profitability, TRINL's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AUC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRINL is less volatile compared to AUC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRINL.Check AUC's competition here
iShares Factors US Small Blend Style ETF (NASDAQ: STSB)
TRINL vs STSB Comparison August 2026
Trinity Capital Inc. - 7.00% No (NASDAQ: TRINL) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRINL stands at 1B. In comparison, STSB has a market cap of 15.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TRINL is priced at $25.07 on the NASDAQ, while STSB trades at $21.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRINL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STSB's P/E ratio is 24.06. In terms of profitability, TRINL's ROE is +0.15%, compared to STSB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TRINL is more volatile compared to STSB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRINL.Check STSB's competition here
Magic Empire Global Limited (NASDAQ: MEGL)
TRINL vs MEGL Comparison August 2026
Trinity Capital Inc. - 7.00% No (NASDAQ: TRINL) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRINL stands at 1B. In comparison, MEGL has a market cap of 9.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TRINL is priced at $25.07 on the NASDAQ, while MEGL trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRINL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MEGL's P/E ratio is -12.73. In terms of profitability, TRINL's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MEGL's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRINL is less volatile compared to MEGL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRINL.Check MEGL's competition here
ATIF Holdings Ltd. (NASDAQ: ZBAI)
TRINL vs ZBAI Comparison August 2026
Trinity Capital Inc. - 7.00% No (NASDAQ: TRINL) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRINL stands at 1B. In comparison, ZBAI has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TRINL is priced at $25.07 on the NASDAQ, while ZBAI trades at $8.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRINL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZBAI's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, TRINL's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ZBAI's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, TRINL is less volatile compared to ZBAI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRINL.Check ZBAI's competition here
AMTD IDEA Group (NYSE: AMTD)
TRINL vs AMTD Comparison August 2026
Trinity Capital Inc. - 7.00% No (NASDAQ: TRINL) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRINL stands at 1B. In comparison, AMTD has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRINL is priced at $25.07 on the NASDAQ, while AMTD trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRINL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMTD's P/E ratio is 0.20. In terms of profitability, TRINL's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AMTD's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRINL is less volatile compared to AMTD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRINL.Check AMTD's competition here
Bitcoin Depot Inc. (NASDAQ: BTMWW)
TRINL vs BTMWW Comparison August 2026
Trinity Capital Inc. - 7.00% No (NASDAQ: TRINL) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRINL stands at 1B. In comparison, BTMWW has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRINL is priced at $25.07 on the NASDAQ, while BTMWW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRINL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTMWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRINL's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BTMWW's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, TRINL is more volatile compared to BTMWW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRINL.Check BTMWW's competition here
2x Daily Software Platform ETF (AMEX: SOFL)
TRINL vs SOFL Comparison August 2026
Trinity Capital Inc. - 7.00% No (NASDAQ: TRINL) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRINL stands at 1B. In comparison, SOFL has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TRINL is priced at $25.07 on the NASDAQ, while SOFL trades at $22.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRINL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOFL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRINL's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SOFL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TRINL is more volatile compared to SOFL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRINL.Check SOFL's competition here
Aurelion Inc. (NASDAQ: AURE)
TRINL vs AURE Comparison August 2026
Trinity Capital Inc. - 7.00% No (NASDAQ: TRINL) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRINL stands at 1B. In comparison, AURE has a market cap of 566.4K. Regarding current trading prices, TRINL is priced at $25.07 on the NASDAQ, while AURE trades at $1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRINL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AURE's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, TRINL's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AURE's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TRINL is less volatile compared to AURE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRINL.Check AURE's competition here
Fidelity Municipal Trust II - Fidelity Michigan Municipal Money Market Fund (NASDAQ: FMIXX)
TRINL vs FMIXX Comparison August 2026
Trinity Capital Inc. - 7.00% No (NASDAQ: TRINL) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRINL stands at 1B. In comparison, FMIXX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRINL is priced at $25.07 on the NASDAQ, while FMIXX trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRINL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMIXX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRINL's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FMIXX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRINL is more volatile compared to FMIXX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRINL.Check FMIXX's competition here
Blackstone / GSO Floating Rate Enhanced Income Fund (NASDAQ: BGFLX)
TRINL vs BGFLX Comparison August 2026
Trinity Capital Inc. - 7.00% No (NASDAQ: TRINL) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRINL stands at 1B. In comparison, BGFLX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRINL is priced at $25.07 on the NASDAQ, while BGFLX trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRINL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BGFLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRINL's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BGFLX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRINL is more volatile compared to BGFLX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRINL.Check BGFLX's competition here
NorthStar Asset Management Group (NYSE: NSAM)
TRINL vs NSAM Comparison August 2026
Trinity Capital Inc. - 7.00% No (NASDAQ: TRINL) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRINL stands at 1B. In comparison, NSAM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRINL is priced at $25.07 on the NASDAQ, while NSAM trades at $15.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRINL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSAM's P/E ratio is 40.06. In terms of profitability, TRINL's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NSAM's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, TRINL is less volatile compared to NSAM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRINL.Check NSAM's competition here
Cowen Inc. - 7.75% Senior Notes (NASDAQ: COWNL)
TRINL vs COWNL Comparison August 2026
Trinity Capital Inc. - 7.00% No (NASDAQ: TRINL) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRINL stands at 1B. In comparison, COWNL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRINL is priced at $25.07 on the NASDAQ, while COWNL trades at $25.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRINL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COWNL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRINL's ROE is +0.15%, compared to COWNL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TRINL is more volatile compared to COWNL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRINL.Check COWNL's competition here
STRATS Trust for United States Cellular Corp. Securities, Series 2004-6 STRATS 6.375 (NYSE: GJH)
TRINL vs GJH Comparison August 2026
Trinity Capital Inc. - 7.00% No (NASDAQ: TRINL) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRINL stands at 1B. In comparison, GJH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRINL is priced at $25.07 on the NASDAQ, while GJH trades at $9.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRINL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GJH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRINL's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GJH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRINL is more volatile compared to GJH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRINL.Check GJH's competition here
YieldShares High Income ETF (AMEX: SNDS)
TRINL vs SNDS Comparison August 2026
Trinity Capital Inc. - 7.00% No (NASDAQ: TRINL) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRINL stands at 1B. In comparison, SNDS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRINL is priced at $25.07 on the NASDAQ, while SNDS trades at $21.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRINL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNDS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRINL's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SNDS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TRINL is less volatile compared to SNDS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRINL.Check SNDS's competition here