The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (BK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Investment - Banking & Investment Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BK | $141.91 | -0.48% | 97.4B | 17.61 | $8.06 | +1.49% |
| IBKR | $95.99 | +5.10% | 165.1B | 41.20 | $2.33 | +0.34% |
| FUSVX | $95.27 | -0.63% | 157B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| BNY | $149.96 | +2.28% | 102.9B | 35.11 | $4.27 | +1.42% |
| ICSFX | $34.13 | +0.68% | 14.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| SF | $75.09 | +2.62% | 11.5B | 10.94 | $6.86 | +1.93% |
| VOYA | $96.28 | +2.02% | 8.7B | 10.64 | $9.05 | +1.94% |
| GLXY | $25.40 | +3.29% | 8.4B | -68.65 | -$0.37 | N/A |
| VOYA-PB | $23.59 | +0.34% | 7.2B | 3.00 | $7.87 | +1.94% |
| MGR | $20.03 | +0.75% | 5.9B | 0.88 | $22.72 | +7.39% |
Stock Comparison
BK vs IBKR Comparison July 2026
BK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BK stands at 97.4B. In comparison, IBKR has a market cap of 165.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BK is priced at $141.91, while IBKR trades at $95.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.61, whereas IBKR's P/E ratio is 41.20. In terms of profitability, BK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IBKR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BK is less volatile compared to IBKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BK.Check IBKR's competition here
BK vs FUSVX Comparison July 2026
BK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BK stands at 97.4B. In comparison, FUSVX has a market cap of 157B. Regarding current trading prices, BK is priced at $141.91, while FUSVX trades at $95.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.61, whereas FUSVX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FUSVX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. BK has daily volatility of 2.61 and FUSVX has daily volatility of N/A.Check FUSVX's competition here
BK vs BNY Comparison July 2026
BK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BK stands at 97.4B. In comparison, BNY has a market cap of 102.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BK is priced at $141.91, while BNY trades at $149.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.61, whereas BNY's P/E ratio is 35.11. In terms of profitability, BK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BNY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BK is more volatile compared to BNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BK.Check BNY's competition here
BK vs ICSFX Comparison July 2026
BK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BK stands at 97.4B. In comparison, ICSFX has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BK is priced at $141.91, while ICSFX trades at $34.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.61, whereas ICSFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ICSFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BK is more volatile compared to ICSFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BK.Check ICSFX's competition here
BK vs SF Comparison July 2026
BK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BK stands at 97.4B. In comparison, SF has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BK is priced at $141.91, while SF trades at $75.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.61, whereas SF's P/E ratio is 10.94. In terms of profitability, BK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BK is more volatile compared to SF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BK.Check SF's competition here
BK vs VOYA Comparison July 2026
BK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BK stands at 97.4B. In comparison, VOYA has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BK is priced at $141.91, while VOYA trades at $96.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.61, whereas VOYA's P/E ratio is 10.64. In terms of profitability, BK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VOYA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BK is more volatile compared to VOYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BK.Check VOYA's competition here
BK vs GLXY Comparison July 2026
BK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BK stands at 97.4B. In comparison, GLXY has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BK is priced at $141.91, while GLXY trades at $25.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.61, whereas GLXY's P/E ratio is -68.65. In terms of profitability, BK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GLXY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BK is less volatile compared to GLXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BK.Check GLXY's competition here
BK vs VOYA-PB Comparison July 2026
BK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BK stands at 97.4B. In comparison, VOYA-PB has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BK is priced at $141.91, while VOYA-PB trades at $23.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.61, whereas VOYA-PB's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, BK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VOYA-PB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BK is more volatile compared to VOYA-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BK.Check VOYA-PB's competition here
BK vs MGR Comparison July 2026
BK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BK stands at 97.4B. In comparison, MGR has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BK is priced at $141.91, while MGR trades at $20.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.61, whereas MGR's P/E ratio is 0.88. In terms of profitability, BK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MGR's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BK is more volatile compared to MGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BK.Check MGR's competition here
BK vs CELFX Comparison July 2026
BK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BK stands at 97.4B. In comparison, CELFX has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BK is priced at $141.91, while CELFX trades at $10.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.61, whereas CELFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CELFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BK is more volatile compared to CELFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BK.Check CELFX's competition here
BK vs PIPR Comparison July 2026
BK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BK stands at 97.4B. In comparison, PIPR has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BK is priced at $141.91, while PIPR trades at $72.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.61, whereas PIPR's P/E ratio is 7.68. In terms of profitability, BK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PIPR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BK is less volatile compared to PIPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BK.Check PIPR's competition here
BK vs PJT Comparison July 2026
BK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BK stands at 97.4B. In comparison, PJT has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BK is priced at $141.91, while PJT trades at $172.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.61, whereas PJT's P/E ratio is 22.99. In terms of profitability, BK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PJT's ROE of +0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, BK is less volatile compared to PJT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BK.Check PJT's competition here
BK vs BULLW Comparison July 2026
BK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BK stands at 97.4B. In comparison, BULLW has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, BK is priced at $141.91, while BULLW trades at $2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.61, whereas BULLW's P/E ratio is 51.26. In terms of profitability, BK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BULLW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BK is less volatile compared to BULLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BK.Check BULLW's competition here
BK vs OAK-PA Comparison July 2026
BK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BK stands at 97.4B. In comparison, OAK-PA has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BK is priced at $141.91, while OAK-PA trades at $21.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.61, whereas OAK-PA's P/E ratio is 9.21. In terms of profitability, BK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OAK-PA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BK is more volatile compared to OAK-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BK.Check OAK-PA's competition here
BK vs OAK-PB Comparison July 2026
BK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BK stands at 97.4B. In comparison, OAK-PB has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BK is priced at $141.91, while OAK-PB trades at $21.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.61, whereas OAK-PB's P/E ratio is 9.14. In terms of profitability, BK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OAK-PB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BK is more volatile compared to OAK-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BK.Check OAK-PB's competition here
BK vs ABXL Comparison July 2026
BK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BK stands at 97.4B. In comparison, ABXL has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BK is priced at $141.91, while ABXL trades at $25.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.61, whereas ABXL's P/E ratio is 325.22. In terms of profitability, BK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ABXL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BK is more volatile compared to ABXL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BK.Check ABXL's competition here
BK vs SFB Comparison July 2026
BK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BK stands at 97.4B. In comparison, SFB has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BK is priced at $141.91, while SFB trades at $19.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.61, whereas SFB's P/E ratio is 3.55. In terms of profitability, BK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SFB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BK is more volatile compared to SFB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BK.Check SFB's competition here
BK vs XPMSX Comparison July 2026
BK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BK stands at 97.4B. In comparison, XPMSX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BK is priced at $141.91, while XPMSX trades at $62.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.61, whereas XPMSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to XPMSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BK is more volatile compared to XPMSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BK.Check XPMSX's competition here
BK vs TRINL Comparison July 2026
BK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BK stands at 97.4B. In comparison, TRINL has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, BK is priced at $141.91, while TRINL trades at $25.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.61, whereas TRINL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TRINL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BK is more volatile compared to TRINL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BK.Check TRINL's competition here
BK vs CGBDL Comparison July 2026
BK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BK stands at 97.4B. In comparison, CGBDL has a market cap of 990.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BK is priced at $141.91, while CGBDL trades at $25.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.61, whereas CGBDL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CGBDL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BK is more volatile compared to CGBDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BK.Check CGBDL's competition here
BK vs PX Comparison July 2026
BK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BK stands at 97.4B. In comparison, PX has a market cap of 829.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BK is priced at $141.91, while PX trades at $7.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.61, whereas PX's P/E ratio is 58.08. In terms of profitability, BK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BK is less volatile compared to PX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BK.Check PX's competition here
BK vs GEGGL Comparison July 2026
BK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BK stands at 97.4B. In comparison, GEGGL has a market cap of 722M. Regarding current trading prices, BK is priced at $141.91, while GEGGL trades at $24.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.61, whereas GEGGL's P/E ratio is -29.75. In terms of profitability, BK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GEGGL's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BK is more volatile compared to GEGGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BK.Check GEGGL's competition here
BK vs RPC Comparison July 2026
BK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BK stands at 97.4B. In comparison, RPC has a market cap of 614M. Regarding current trading prices, BK is priced at $141.91, while RPC trades at $7.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.61, whereas RPC's P/E ratio is 16.35. In terms of profitability, BK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RPC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BK is less volatile compared to RPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BK.Check RPC's competition here
BK vs GLADZ Comparison July 2026
BK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BK stands at 97.4B. In comparison, GLADZ has a market cap of 563.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BK is priced at $141.91, while GLADZ trades at $25.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.61, whereas GLADZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GLADZ's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BK is more volatile compared to GLADZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BK.Check GLADZ's competition here
BK vs RJF-PB Comparison July 2026
BK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BK stands at 97.4B. In comparison, RJF-PB has a market cap of 463.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BK is priced at $141.91, while RJF-PB trades at $2.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.61, whereas RJF-PB's P/E ratio is 0.33. In terms of profitability, BK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RJF-PB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BK is more volatile compared to RJF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BK.Check RJF-PB's competition here
BK vs PMPEX Comparison July 2026
BK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BK stands at 97.4B. In comparison, PMPEX has a market cap of 413.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BK is priced at $141.91, while PMPEX trades at $17.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.61, whereas PMPEX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PMPEX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BK is more volatile compared to PMPEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BK.Check PMPEX's competition here
BK vs KCHVU Comparison July 2026
BK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BK stands at 97.4B. In comparison, KCHVU has a market cap of 370.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BK is priced at $141.91, while KCHVU trades at $10.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.61, whereas KCHVU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KCHVU's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BK is more volatile compared to KCHVU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BK.Check KCHVU's competition here
BK vs SAJ Comparison July 2026
BK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BK stands at 97.4B. In comparison, SAJ has a market cap of 358.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BK is priced at $141.91, while SAJ trades at $25.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.61, whereas SAJ's P/E ratio is 9.66. In terms of profitability, BK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SAJ's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BK is more volatile compared to SAJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BK.Check SAJ's competition here
BK vs KCHV Comparison July 2026
BK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BK stands at 97.4B. In comparison, KCHV has a market cap of 355.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BK is priced at $141.91, while KCHV trades at $10.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.61, whereas KCHV's P/E ratio is 35.76. In terms of profitability, BK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KCHV's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BK is more volatile compared to KCHV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BK.Check KCHV's competition here
BK vs SAZ Comparison July 2026
BK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BK stands at 97.4B. In comparison, SAZ has a market cap of 354.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BK is priced at $141.91, while SAZ trades at $25.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.61, whereas SAZ's P/E ratio is 9.62. In terms of profitability, BK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SAZ's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BK is more volatile compared to SAZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BK.Check SAZ's competition here
BK vs RILYZ Comparison July 2026
BK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BK stands at 97.4B. In comparison, RILYZ has a market cap of 324.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BK is priced at $141.91, while RILYZ trades at $18.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.61, whereas RILYZ's P/E ratio is 2.54. In terms of profitability, BK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RILYZ's ROE of -2.63%. Regarding short-term risk, BK is more volatile compared to RILYZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BK.Check RILYZ's competition here
BK vs OPPE Comparison July 2026
BK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BK stands at 97.4B. In comparison, OPPE has a market cap of 162.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BK is priced at $141.91, while OPPE trades at $57.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.61, whereas OPPE's P/E ratio is 15.93. In terms of profitability, BK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OPPE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BK is more volatile compared to OPPE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BK.Check OPPE's competition here
BK vs WHFCL Comparison July 2026
BK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BK stands at 97.4B. In comparison, WHFCL has a market cap of 143.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BK is priced at $141.91, while WHFCL trades at $25.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.61, whereas WHFCL's P/E ratio is 61.40. In terms of profitability, BK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WHFCL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BK is more volatile compared to WHFCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BK.Check WHFCL's competition here
BK vs GECCZ Comparison July 2026
BK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BK stands at 97.4B. In comparison, GECCZ has a market cap of 125.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BK is priced at $141.91, while GECCZ trades at $25.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.61, whereas GECCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GECCZ's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BK is more volatile compared to GECCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BK.Check GECCZ's competition here
BK vs AUC Comparison July 2026
BK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BK stands at 97.4B. In comparison, AUC has a market cap of 80.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BK is priced at $141.91, while AUC trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.61, whereas AUC's P/E ratio is -3.47. In terms of profitability, BK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AUC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BK is less volatile compared to AUC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BK.Check AUC's competition here
BK vs STSB Comparison July 2026
BK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BK stands at 97.4B. In comparison, STSB has a market cap of 15.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BK is priced at $141.91, while STSB trades at $21.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.61, whereas STSB's P/E ratio is 24.06. In terms of profitability, BK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to STSB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BK is more volatile compared to STSB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BK.Check STSB's competition here
BK vs ZBAI Comparison July 2026
BK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BK stands at 97.4B. In comparison, ZBAI has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BK is priced at $141.91, while ZBAI trades at $8.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.61, whereas ZBAI's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, BK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ZBAI's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, BK is less volatile compared to ZBAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BK.Check ZBAI's competition here
BK vs BTMWW Comparison July 2026
BK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BK stands at 97.4B. In comparison, BTMWW has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BK is priced at $141.91, while BTMWW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.61, whereas BTMWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BTMWW's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, BK is more volatile compared to BTMWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BK.Check BTMWW's competition here
BK vs SOFL Comparison July 2026
BK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BK stands at 97.4B. In comparison, SOFL has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BK is priced at $141.91, while SOFL trades at $22.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.61, whereas SOFL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SOFL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BK is more volatile compared to SOFL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BK.Check SOFL's competition here
BK vs AURE Comparison July 2026
BK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BK stands at 97.4B. In comparison, AURE has a market cap of 598K. Regarding current trading prices, BK is priced at $141.91, while AURE trades at $1.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.61, whereas AURE's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, BK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AURE's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BK is less volatile compared to AURE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BK.Check AURE's competition here
BK vs COWNL Comparison July 2026
BK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BK stands at 97.4B. In comparison, COWNL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BK is priced at $141.91, while COWNL trades at $25.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.61, whereas COWNL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to COWNL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BK is more volatile compared to COWNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BK.Check COWNL's competition here
BK vs BGFLX Comparison July 2026
BK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BK stands at 97.4B. In comparison, BGFLX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BK is priced at $141.91, while BGFLX trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.61, whereas BGFLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BGFLX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BK is more volatile compared to BGFLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BK.Check BGFLX's competition here
BK vs GJH Comparison July 2026
BK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BK stands at 97.4B. In comparison, GJH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BK is priced at $141.91, while GJH trades at $9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.61, whereas GJH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GJH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BK is more volatile compared to GJH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BK.Check GJH's competition here
BK vs NSAM Comparison July 2026
BK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BK stands at 97.4B. In comparison, NSAM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BK is priced at $141.91, while NSAM trades at $15.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.61, whereas NSAM's P/E ratio is 41.05. In terms of profitability, BK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NSAM's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, BK is less volatile compared to NSAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BK.Check NSAM's competition here
BK vs FMIXX Comparison July 2026
BK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BK stands at 97.4B. In comparison, FMIXX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BK is priced at $141.91, while FMIXX trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.61, whereas FMIXX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FMIXX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BK is more volatile compared to FMIXX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BK.Check FMIXX's competition here
BK vs SNDS Comparison July 2026
BK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BK stands at 97.4B. In comparison, SNDS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BK is priced at $141.91, while SNDS trades at $21.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BK currently has a P/E ratio of 17.61, whereas SNDS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BK's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SNDS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BK is less volatile compared to SNDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BK.Check SNDS's competition here