XL Fleet Corp.
XL Fleet Corp. XL Peers
See (XL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XL | $1.14 | +30.91% | 164.4M | -3.21 | -$0.36 | N/A |
| APTV-PA | $108.66 | +0.15% | 29.4B | 92.08 | $1.18 | N/A |
| APTV | $67.59 | -2.31% | 14.7B | 11.04 | $6.12 | N/A |
| MBLY | $14.98 | -2.92% | 12.2B | -4.07 | -$3.68 | N/A |
| MGA | $37.28 | -1.56% | 10.5B | 9.30 | $4.01 | +5.18% |
| LKQ | $37.15 | -2.34% | 9.6B | 13.91 | $2.67 | +3.23% |
| ALV | $110.07 | -1.15% | 8.5B | 12.71 | $8.66 | +2.52% |
| ALSN | $93.36 | -2.15% | 7.9B | 10.81 | $8.64 | +1.11% |
| BWA | $32.83 | -1.59% | 7.2B | 23.12 | $1.42 | +1.34% |
| MOD | $94.05 | -1.88% | 4.9B | 26.49 | $3.55 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
XL vs APTV-PA Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.4M. In comparison, APTV-PA has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while APTV-PA trades at $108.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas APTV-PA's P/E ratio is 92.08. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to APTV-PA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to APTV-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs APTV Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.4M. In comparison, APTV has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while APTV trades at $67.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas APTV's P/E ratio is 11.04. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to APTV's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to APTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs MBLY Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.4M. In comparison, MBLY has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while MBLY trades at $14.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas MBLY's P/E ratio is -4.07. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to MBLY's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to MBLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs MGA Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.4M. In comparison, MGA has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while MGA trades at $37.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas MGA's P/E ratio is 9.30. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to MGA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to MGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs LKQ Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.4M. In comparison, LKQ has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while LKQ trades at $37.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas LKQ's P/E ratio is 13.91. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to LKQ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to LKQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs ALV Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.4M. In comparison, ALV has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while ALV trades at $110.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas ALV's P/E ratio is 12.71. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to ALV's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to ALV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs ALSN Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.4M. In comparison, ALSN has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while ALSN trades at $93.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas ALSN's P/E ratio is 10.81. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to ALSN's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to ALSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs BWA Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.4M. In comparison, BWA has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while BWA trades at $32.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas BWA's P/E ratio is 23.12. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to BWA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to BWA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs MOD Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.4M. In comparison, MOD has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while MOD trades at $94.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas MOD's P/E ratio is 26.49. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to MOD's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to MOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs LEA Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.4M. In comparison, LEA has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while LEA trades at $90.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas LEA's P/E ratio is 10.59. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to LEA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to LEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs GNTX Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.4M. In comparison, GNTX has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while GNTX trades at $21.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas GNTX's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to GNTX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to GNTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs BC-PB Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.4M. In comparison, BC-PB has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while BC-PB trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas BC-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to BC-PB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to BC-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs DORM Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.4M. In comparison, DORM has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while DORM trades at $121.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas DORM's P/E ratio is 17.42. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to DORM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to DORM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs BC-PA Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.4M. In comparison, BC-PA has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while BC-PA trades at $23.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas BC-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to BC-PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to BC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs GT Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.4M. In comparison, GT has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while GT trades at $10.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas GT's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to GT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to GT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs DAN Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.4M. In comparison, DAN has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while DAN trades at $17.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas DAN's P/E ratio is -73.12. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to DAN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to DAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs VC Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.4M. In comparison, VC has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while VC trades at $90.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas VC's P/E ratio is 7.92. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to VC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to VC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs QS Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.4M. In comparison, QS has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while QS trades at $4.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas QS's P/E ratio is -4.65. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to QS's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to QS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs HSAI Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.4M. In comparison, HSAI has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while HSAI trades at $17.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas HSAI's P/E ratio is -1784.00. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to HSAI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to HSAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs GTX Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.4M. In comparison, GTX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while GTX trades at $10.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas GTX's P/E ratio is 7.98. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to GTX's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to GTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs PHIN Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.4M. In comparison, PHIN has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while PHIN trades at $42.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas PHIN's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to PHIN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to PHIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs ADNT Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.4M. In comparison, ADNT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while ADNT trades at $18.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas ADNT's P/E ratio is -5.86. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to ADNT's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to ADNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs AEVA Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.4M. In comparison, AEVA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while AEVA trades at $25.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas AEVA's P/E ratio is -9.03. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to AEVA's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to AEVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs FOXF Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.4M. In comparison, FOXF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while FOXF trades at $25.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas FOXF's P/E ratio is -4.19. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to FOXF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to FOXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs XPEL Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.4M. In comparison, XPEL has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while XPEL trades at $36.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas XPEL's P/E ratio is 21.11. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to XPEL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to XPEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs THRM Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.4M. In comparison, THRM has a market cap of 847.7M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while THRM trades at $27.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas THRM's P/E ratio is 17.61. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to THRM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to THRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs PLOW Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.4M. In comparison, PLOW has a market cap of 668M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while PLOW trades at $28.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas PLOW's P/E ratio is 10.54. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to PLOW's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to PLOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs SMP Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.4M. In comparison, SMP has a market cap of 661.6M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while SMP trades at $30.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas SMP's P/E ratio is 11.67. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to SMP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to SMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs ECX Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.4M. In comparison, ECX has a market cap of 617.1M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while ECX trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas ECX's P/E ratio is -5.43. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to ECX's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to ECX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs GTXAP Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.4M. In comparison, GTXAP has a market cap of 557.9M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while GTXAP trades at $8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas GTXAP's P/E ratio is 4.44. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to GTXAP's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to GTXAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs AXL Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.4M. In comparison, AXL has a market cap of 501.3M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while AXL trades at $4.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas AXL's P/E ratio is 23.47. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to AXL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to AXL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs MLR Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.4M. In comparison, MLR has a market cap of 497M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while MLR trades at $43.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas MLR's P/E ratio is 9.25. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to MLR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to MLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs ALLG Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.4M. In comparison, ALLG has a market cap of 496.9M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while ALLG trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas ALLG's P/E ratio is -3.96. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to ALLG's ROE of +4.17%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is less volatile compared to ALLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs MNRO Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.4M. In comparison, MNRO has a market cap of 431.6M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while MNRO trades at $14.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas MNRO's P/E ratio is -65.45. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to MNRO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to MNRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs CPS Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.4M. In comparison, CPS has a market cap of 377.5M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while CPS trades at $21.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas CPS's P/E ratio is -8.34. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to CPS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to CPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs SES Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.4M. In comparison, SES has a market cap of 338.8M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while SES trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas SES's P/E ratio is -3.18. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to SES's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to SES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs HLLY-WT Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.4M. In comparison, HLLY-WT has a market cap of 256M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while HLLY-WT trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas HLLY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to HLLY-WT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to HLLY-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs HYLN Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.4M. In comparison, HYLN has a market cap of 250.6M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while HYLN trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas HYLN's P/E ratio is -4.61. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to HYLN's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to HYLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs STRT Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.4M. In comparison, STRT has a market cap of 247.3M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while STRT trades at $59.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas STRT's P/E ratio is 11.96. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to STRT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to STRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs HLLY Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.4M. In comparison, HLLY has a market cap of 246.5M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while HLLY trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas HLLY's P/E ratio is -9.86. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to HLLY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to HLLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs INVZ Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.4M. In comparison, INVZ has a market cap of 218.9M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while INVZ trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas INVZ's P/E ratio is -2.39. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to INVZ's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is less volatile compared to INVZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs MPAA Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.4M. In comparison, MPAA has a market cap of 197.5M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while MPAA trades at $10.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas MPAA's P/E ratio is -9.86. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to MPAA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to MPAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs INVZW Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.4M. In comparison, INVZW has a market cap of 182.9M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while INVZW trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas INVZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to INVZW's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is less volatile compared to INVZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs SRI Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.4M. In comparison, SRI has a market cap of 170.1M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while SRI trades at $6.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas SRI's P/E ratio is -9.54. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to SRI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to SRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs LAZR Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.4M. In comparison, LAZR has a market cap of 143.2M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while LAZR trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas LAZR's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to LAZR's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to LAZR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs CAAS Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.4M. In comparison, CAAS has a market cap of 130.9M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while CAAS trades at $4.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas CAAS's P/E ratio is 4.52. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to CAAS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to CAAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs KNDI Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.4M. In comparison, KNDI has a market cap of 91.1M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while KNDI trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas KNDI's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to KNDI's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to KNDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs GGR Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.4M. In comparison, GGR has a market cap of 73.8M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while GGR trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas GGR's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to GGR's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to GGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs WPRT Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.4M. In comparison, WPRT has a market cap of 50.5M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while WPRT trades at $2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas WPRT's P/E ratio is -4.70. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to WPRT's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to WPRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs SYPR Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.4M. In comparison, SYPR has a market cap of 47.1M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while SYPR trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas SYPR's P/E ratio is -102.50. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to SYPR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to SYPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs CVGI Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.4M. In comparison, CVGI has a market cap of 46.1M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while CVGI trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas CVGI's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to CVGI's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to CVGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs MKDW Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.4M. In comparison, MKDW has a market cap of 39.2M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while MKDW trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas MKDW's P/E ratio is -1.82. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to MKDW's ROE of +1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to MKDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs MKDWW Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.4M. In comparison, MKDWW has a market cap of 38.9M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while MKDWW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas MKDWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to MKDWW's ROE of +1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to MKDWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs NCNC Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.4M. In comparison, NCNC has a market cap of 20.2M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while NCNC trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas NCNC's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to NCNC's ROE of +3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to NCNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs NCNCW Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.4M. In comparison, NCNCW has a market cap of 20.2M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while NCNCW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas NCNCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to NCNCW's ROE of +3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to NCNCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs ECXWW Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.4M. In comparison, ECXWW has a market cap of 19.5M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while ECXWW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas ECXWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to ECXWW's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to ECXWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs AMV Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.4M. In comparison, AMV has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while AMV trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas AMV's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to AMV's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to AMV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs INEO Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.4M. In comparison, INEO has a market cap of 16M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while INEO trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas INEO's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to INEO's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is less volatile compared to INEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs WKSP Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.4M. In comparison, WKSP has a market cap of 15.9M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while WKSP trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas WKSP's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to WKSP's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to WKSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs LIDR Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.4M. In comparison, LIDR has a market cap of 15.4M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while LIDR trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas LIDR's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to LIDR's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to LIDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs LIDRW Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.4M. In comparison, LIDRW has a market cap of 14.2M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while LIDRW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas LIDRW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to LIDRW's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to LIDRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs SAG Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.4M. In comparison, SAG has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while SAG trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas SAG's P/E ratio is 6.73. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to SAG's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to SAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs SUP Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.4M. In comparison, SUP has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while SUP trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas SUP's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to SUP's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to SUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs FRSX Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.4M. In comparison, FRSX has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while FRSX trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas FRSX's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to FRSX's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to FRSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs CREV Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.4M. In comparison, CREV has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while CREV trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas CREV's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to CREV's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to CREV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs GGROW Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.4M. In comparison, GGROW has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while GGROW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas GGROW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to GGROW's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to GGROW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs UFAB Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.4M. In comparison, UFAB has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while UFAB trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas UFAB's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to UFAB's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to UFAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs WKSPW Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.4M. In comparison, WKSPW has a market cap of 575.3K. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while WKSPW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas WKSPW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to WKSPW's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to WKSPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs CREVW Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.4M. In comparison, CREVW has a market cap of 108.2K. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while CREVW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas CREVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to CREVW's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to CREVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs HYZNW Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.4M. In comparison, HYZNW has a market cap of 15.5K. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while HYZNW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas HYZNW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to HYZNW's ROE of -2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is less volatile compared to HYZNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs VNE Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.4M. In comparison, VNE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while VNE trades at $36.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas VNE's P/E ratio is -10.74. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to VNE's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to VNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs RMO Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.4M. In comparison, RMO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while RMO trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas RMO's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to RMO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to RMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs HZN Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.4M. In comparison, HZN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while HZN trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas HZN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to HZN's ROE of +1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to HZN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs MTOR Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.4M. In comparison, MTOR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while MTOR trades at $36.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas MTOR's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to MTOR's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to MTOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.