XL Fleet Corp.
XL Fleet Corp. XL Peers
See (XL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XL | $1.14 | +30.91% | 164.38M | -3.21 | -$0.36 | N/A |
| APTV-PA | $108.66 | +0.15% | 29.42B | 92.08 | $1.18 | N/A |
| APTV | $66.93 | -0.04% | 14.57B | 10.94 | $6.12 | N/A |
| MBLY | $15.99 | +1.33% | 12.98B | -4.35 | -$3.68 | N/A |
| LKQ | $40.51 | +0.32% | 10.46B | 15.06 | $2.69 | +2.96% |
| MGA | $35.67 | +0.17% | 10.05B | 8.90 | $4.01 | +5.37% |
| ALSN | $103.51 | -0.32% | 8.72B | 11.98 | $8.64 | +1.00% |
| ALV | $100.60 | +0.06% | 7.78B | 11.62 | $8.66 | +2.75% |
| BWA | $32.95 | +0.73% | 7.24B | 23.20 | $1.42 | +1.33% |
| GNTX | $21.96 | -0.90% | 4.94B | 12.84 | $1.71 | +2.18% |
Stock Comparison
XL vs APTV-PA Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.38M. In comparison, APTV-PA has a market cap of 29.42B. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while APTV-PA trades at $108.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas APTV-PA's P/E ratio is 92.08. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to APTV-PA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to APTV-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs APTV Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.38M. In comparison, APTV has a market cap of 14.57B. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while APTV trades at $66.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas APTV's P/E ratio is 10.94. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to APTV's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to APTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs MBLY Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.38M. In comparison, MBLY has a market cap of 12.98B. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while MBLY trades at $15.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas MBLY's P/E ratio is -4.35. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to MBLY's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to MBLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs LKQ Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.38M. In comparison, LKQ has a market cap of 10.46B. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while LKQ trades at $40.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas LKQ's P/E ratio is 15.06. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to LKQ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to LKQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs MGA Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.38M. In comparison, MGA has a market cap of 10.05B. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while MGA trades at $35.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas MGA's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to MGA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to MGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs ALSN Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.38M. In comparison, ALSN has a market cap of 8.72B. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while ALSN trades at $103.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas ALSN's P/E ratio is 11.98. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to ALSN's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to ALSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs ALV Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.38M. In comparison, ALV has a market cap of 7.78B. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while ALV trades at $100.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas ALV's P/E ratio is 11.62. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to ALV's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to ALV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs BWA Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.38M. In comparison, BWA has a market cap of 7.24B. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while BWA trades at $32.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas BWA's P/E ratio is 23.20. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to BWA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to BWA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs GNTX Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.38M. In comparison, GNTX has a market cap of 4.94B. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while GNTX trades at $21.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas GNTX's P/E ratio is 12.84. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to GNTX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to GNTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs LEA Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.38M. In comparison, LEA has a market cap of 4.84B. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while LEA trades at $90.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas LEA's P/E ratio is 10.57. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to LEA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to LEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs MOD Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.38M. In comparison, MOD has a market cap of 4.75B. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while MOD trades at $90.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas MOD's P/E ratio is 26.40. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to MOD's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to MOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs DORM Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.38M. In comparison, DORM has a market cap of 3.85B. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while DORM trades at $126.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas DORM's P/E ratio is 18.10. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to DORM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to DORM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs BC-PB Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.38M. In comparison, BC-PB has a market cap of 3.73B. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while BC-PB trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas BC-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to BC-PB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to BC-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs BC-PA Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.38M. In comparison, BC-PA has a market cap of 3.32B. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while BC-PA trades at $23.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas BC-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to BC-PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to BC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs GT Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.38M. In comparison, GT has a market cap of 3.18B. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while GT trades at $11.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas GT's P/E ratio is 13.25. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to GT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to GT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs HSAI Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.38M. In comparison, HSAI has a market cap of 2.87B. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while HSAI trades at $21.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas HSAI's P/E ratio is -196.64. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to HSAI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to HSAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs DAN Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.38M. In comparison, DAN has a market cap of 2.36B. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while DAN trades at $16.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas DAN's P/E ratio is -67.33. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to DAN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to DAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs VC Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.38M. In comparison, VC has a market cap of 2.29B. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while VC trades at $84.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas VC's P/E ratio is 7.87. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to VC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to VC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs GTX Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.38M. In comparison, GTX has a market cap of 2.27B. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while GTX trades at $11.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas GTX's P/E ratio is 8.73. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to GTX's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to GTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs QS Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.38M. In comparison, QS has a market cap of 2.22B. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while QS trades at $3.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas QS's P/E ratio is -4.36. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to QS's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to QS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs PHIN Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.38M. In comparison, PHIN has a market cap of 1.70B. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while PHIN trades at $42.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas PHIN's P/E ratio is 24.19. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to PHIN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to PHIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs ADNT Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.38M. In comparison, ADNT has a market cap of 1.26B. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while ADNT trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas ADNT's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to ADNT's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to ADNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs FOXF Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.38M. In comparison, FOXF has a market cap of 1.02B. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while FOXF trades at $24.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas FOXF's P/E ratio is -4.08. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to FOXF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to FOXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs XPEL Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.38M. In comparison, XPEL has a market cap of 985.14M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while XPEL trades at $35.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas XPEL's P/E ratio is 20.70. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to XPEL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to XPEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs AEVA Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.38M. In comparison, AEVA has a market cap of 885.86M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while AEVA trades at $16.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas AEVA's P/E ratio is -5.71. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to AEVA's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to AEVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs THRM Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.38M. In comparison, THRM has a market cap of 841.24M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while THRM trades at $27.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas THRM's P/E ratio is 17.14. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to THRM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to THRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs SMP Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.38M. In comparison, SMP has a market cap of 633.71M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while SMP trades at $28.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas SMP's P/E ratio is 11.17. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to SMP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to SMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs PLOW Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.38M. In comparison, PLOW has a market cap of 630.60M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while PLOW trades at $27.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas PLOW's P/E ratio is 9.95. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to PLOW's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to PLOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs GTXAP Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.38M. In comparison, GTXAP has a market cap of 557.94M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while GTXAP trades at $8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas GTXAP's P/E ratio is 4.44. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to GTXAP's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to GTXAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs AXL Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.38M. In comparison, AXL has a market cap of 519.74M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while AXL trades at $4.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas AXL's P/E ratio is 24.33. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to AXL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to AXL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs ECX Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.38M. In comparison, ECX has a market cap of 516.38M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while ECX trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas ECX's P/E ratio is -4.54. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to ECX's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to ECX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs MLR Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.38M. In comparison, MLR has a market cap of 511.54M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while MLR trades at $44.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas MLR's P/E ratio is 9.52. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to MLR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to MLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs ALLG Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.38M. In comparison, ALLG has a market cap of 496.92M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while ALLG trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas ALLG's P/E ratio is -3.96. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to ALLG's ROE of +2.07%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is less volatile compared to ALLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs CPS Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.38M. In comparison, CPS has a market cap of 388.69M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while CPS trades at $22.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas CPS's P/E ratio is -8.59. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to CPS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to CPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs MNRO Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.38M. In comparison, MNRO has a market cap of 383.35M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while MNRO trades at $12.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas MNRO's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to MNRO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to MNRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs SES Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.38M. In comparison, SES has a market cap of 352.66M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while SES trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas SES's P/E ratio is -3.20. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to SES's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to SES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs HLLY-WT Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.38M. In comparison, HLLY-WT has a market cap of 258.42M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while HLLY-WT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas HLLY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to HLLY-WT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to HLLY-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs HLLY Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.38M. In comparison, HLLY has a market cap of 240.56M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while HLLY trades at $2.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas HLLY's P/E ratio is -9.62. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to HLLY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to HLLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs MPAA Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.38M. In comparison, MPAA has a market cap of 224.04M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while MPAA trades at $11.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas MPAA's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to MPAA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to MPAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs STRT Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.38M. In comparison, STRT has a market cap of 215.91M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while STRT trades at $51.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas STRT's P/E ratio is 10.44. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to STRT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to STRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs HYLN Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.38M. In comparison, HYLN has a market cap of 199.94M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while HYLN trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas HYLN's P/E ratio is -4.39. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to HYLN's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to HYLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs INVZW Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.38M. In comparison, INVZW has a market cap of 198.91M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while INVZW trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas INVZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to INVZW's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to INVZW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs INVZ Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.38M. In comparison, INVZ has a market cap of 178.73M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while INVZ trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas INVZ's P/E ratio is -1.95. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to INVZ's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to INVZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs LAZR Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.38M. In comparison, LAZR has a market cap of 177.01M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while LAZR trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas LAZR's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to LAZR's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to LAZR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs SRI Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.38M. In comparison, SRI has a market cap of 133.66M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while SRI trades at $4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas SRI's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to SRI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to SRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs CAAS Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.38M. In comparison, CAAS has a market cap of 124.60M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while CAAS trades at $4.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas CAAS's P/E ratio is 4.30. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to CAAS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to CAAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs KNDI Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.38M. In comparison, KNDI has a market cap of 97.16M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while KNDI trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas KNDI's P/E ratio is -1.92. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to KNDI's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to KNDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs GGR Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.38M. In comparison, GGR has a market cap of 73.25M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while GGR trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas GGR's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to GGR's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to GGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs WPRT Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.38M. In comparison, WPRT has a market cap of 50.94M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while WPRT trades at $2.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas WPRT's P/E ratio is -4.74. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to WPRT's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to WPRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs MKDW Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.38M. In comparison, MKDW has a market cap of 47.21M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while MKDW trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas MKDW's P/E ratio is -2.19. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to MKDW's ROE of +1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to MKDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs CVGI Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.38M. In comparison, CVGI has a market cap of 45.72M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while CVGI trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas CVGI's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to CVGI's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to CVGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs SYPR Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.38M. In comparison, SYPR has a market cap of 36.77M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while SYPR trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas SYPR's P/E ratio is -80.00. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to SYPR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to SYPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs ECXWW Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.38M. In comparison, ECXWW has a market cap of 22.93M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while ECXWW trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas ECXWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to ECXWW's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to ECXWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs NCNC Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.38M. In comparison, NCNC has a market cap of 20.16M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while NCNC trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas NCNC's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to NCNC's ROE of +3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to NCNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs NCNCW Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.38M. In comparison, NCNCW has a market cap of 20.16M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while NCNCW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas NCNCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to NCNCW's ROE of +3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to NCNCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs LIDRW Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.38M. In comparison, LIDRW has a market cap of 18.35M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while LIDRW trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas LIDRW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to LIDRW's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is less volatile compared to LIDRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs AMV Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.38M. In comparison, AMV has a market cap of 17.83M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while AMV trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas AMV's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to AMV's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to AMV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs SUP Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.38M. In comparison, SUP has a market cap of 15.41M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while SUP trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas SUP's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to SUP's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to SUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs LIDR Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.38M. In comparison, LIDR has a market cap of 14.55M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while LIDR trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas LIDR's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to LIDR's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to LIDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs WKSP Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.38M. In comparison, WKSP has a market cap of 13.68M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while WKSP trades at $2.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas WKSP's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to WKSP's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to WKSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs SAG Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.38M. In comparison, SAG has a market cap of 10.35M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while SAG trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas SAG's P/E ratio is 6.73. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to SAG's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to SAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs INEO Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.38M. In comparison, INEO has a market cap of 8.84M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while INEO trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas INEO's P/E ratio is 5.97. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to INEO's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to INEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs CREV Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.38M. In comparison, CREV has a market cap of 6.35M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while CREV trades at $3.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas CREV's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to CREV's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to CREV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs GGROW Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.38M. In comparison, GGROW has a market cap of 4.87M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while GGROW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas GGROW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to GGROW's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to GGROW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs UFAB Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.38M. In comparison, UFAB has a market cap of 1.97M. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while UFAB trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas UFAB's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to UFAB's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to UFAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs WKSPW Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.38M. In comparison, WKSPW has a market cap of 575286.00. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while WKSPW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas WKSPW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to WKSPW's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to WKSPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs FRSX Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.38M. In comparison, FRSX has a market cap of 369067.00. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while FRSX trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas FRSX's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to FRSX's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is more volatile compared to FRSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs CREVW Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.38M. In comparison, CREVW has a market cap of 127007.00. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while CREVW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas CREVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to CREVW's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is less volatile compared to CREVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.
XL vs HYZNW Comparison
XL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XL stands at 164.38M. In comparison, HYZNW has a market cap of 15529.00. Regarding current trading prices, XL is priced at $1.14, while HYZNW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XL currently has a P/E ratio of -3.21, whereas HYZNW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, XL's ROE is N/A, compared to HYZNW's ROE of -2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, XL is less volatile compared to HYZNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XL.