The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ: GT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See GT's competitors and their performance on the NASDAQ and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for GT and its NASDAQ peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GT | $7.21 | +2.56% | 2.1B | 65.55 | $0.11 | N/A |
| APTV-PA | $108.66 | +0.15% | 29.4B | 92.08 | $1.18 | N/A |
| MGA | $65.66 | -0.15% | 17.9B | 10.37 | $6.33 | +2.99% |
| BWA | $64.39 | +0.09% | 13.2B | 12.78 | $5.04 | +1.06% |
| APTV | $56.55 | +0.80% | 12B | 7.20 | $7.86 | N/A |
| ALSN | $122.34 | +2.26% | 10.1B | 19.03 | $6.43 | +0.92% |
| ALV | $117.49 | +1.98% | 8.6B | 12.02 | $9.77 | +2.95% |
| LEA | $143.60 | +0.82% | 7.2B | 10.61 | $13.54 | +2.14% |
| LKQ | $25.82 | +4.03% | 6.6B | 8.69 | $2.97 | +4.65% |
| MBLY | $8.05 | +7.76% | 6.6B | 20.13 | $0.40 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
Aptiv PLC (NYSE: APTV-PA)
GT vs APTV-PA Comparison July 2026
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ: GT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GT stands at 2.1B. In comparison, APTV-PA has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GT is priced at $7.21 on the NASDAQ, while APTV-PA trades at $108.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GT currently has a P/E ratio of 65.55, whereas APTV-PA's P/E ratio is 92.08. In terms of profitability, GT's ROE is -0.58%, compared to APTV-PA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GT is more volatile compared to APTV-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GT.Check APTV-PA's competition here
Magna International Inc. (NYSE: MGA)
GT vs MGA Comparison July 2026
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ: GT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GT stands at 2.1B. In comparison, MGA has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GT is priced at $7.21 on the NASDAQ, while MGA trades at $65.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GT currently has a P/E ratio of 65.55, whereas MGA's P/E ratio is 10.37. In terms of profitability, GT's ROE is -0.58%, compared to MGA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GT is more volatile compared to MGA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GT.Check MGA's competition here
BorgWarner Inc. (NYSE: BWA)
GT vs BWA Comparison July 2026
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ: GT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GT stands at 2.1B. In comparison, BWA has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GT is priced at $7.21 on the NASDAQ, while BWA trades at $64.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GT currently has a P/E ratio of 65.55, whereas BWA's P/E ratio is 12.78. In terms of profitability, GT's ROE is -0.58%, compared to BWA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GT is more volatile compared to BWA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GT.Check BWA's competition here
Aptiv PLC (NYSE: APTV)
GT vs APTV Comparison July 2026
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ: GT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GT stands at 2.1B. In comparison, APTV has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, GT is priced at $7.21 on the NASDAQ, while APTV trades at $56.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GT currently has a P/E ratio of 65.55, whereas APTV's P/E ratio is 7.20. In terms of profitability, GT's ROE is -0.58%, compared to APTV's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GT is more volatile compared to APTV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GT.Check APTV's competition here
Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ALSN)
GT vs ALSN Comparison July 2026
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ: GT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GT stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ALSN has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GT is priced at $7.21 on the NASDAQ, while ALSN trades at $122.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GT currently has a P/E ratio of 65.55, whereas ALSN's P/E ratio is 19.03. In terms of profitability, GT's ROE is -0.58%, compared to ALSN's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GT is more volatile compared to ALSN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GT.Check ALSN's competition here
Autoliv, Inc. (NYSE: ALV)
GT vs ALV Comparison July 2026
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ: GT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GT stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ALV has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GT is priced at $7.21 on the NASDAQ, while ALV trades at $117.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GT currently has a P/E ratio of 65.55, whereas ALV's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, GT's ROE is -0.58%, compared to ALV's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GT is more volatile compared to ALV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GT.Check ALV's competition here
Lear Corporation (NYSE: LEA)
GT vs LEA Comparison July 2026
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ: GT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GT stands at 2.1B. In comparison, LEA has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GT is priced at $7.21 on the NASDAQ, while LEA trades at $143.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GT currently has a P/E ratio of 65.55, whereas LEA's P/E ratio is 10.61. In terms of profitability, GT's ROE is -0.58%, compared to LEA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GT is more volatile compared to LEA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GT.Check LEA's competition here
LKQ Corporation (NASDAQ: LKQ)
GT vs LKQ Comparison July 2026
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ: GT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GT stands at 2.1B. In comparison, LKQ has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GT is priced at $7.21 on the NASDAQ, while LKQ trades at $25.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GT currently has a P/E ratio of 65.55, whereas LKQ's P/E ratio is 8.69. In terms of profitability, GT's ROE is -0.58%, compared to LKQ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GT is less volatile compared to LKQ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GT.Check LKQ's competition here
Mobileye Global Inc. (NASDAQ: MBLY)
GT vs MBLY Comparison July 2026
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ: GT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GT stands at 2.1B. In comparison, MBLY has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GT is priced at $7.21 on the NASDAQ, while MBLY trades at $8.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GT currently has a P/E ratio of 65.55, whereas MBLY's P/E ratio is 20.13. In terms of profitability, GT's ROE is -0.58%, compared to MBLY's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GT is less volatile compared to MBLY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GT.Check MBLY's competition here
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX)
GT vs GTX Comparison July 2026
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ: GT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GT stands at 2.1B. In comparison, GTX has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GT is priced at $7.21 on the NASDAQ, while GTX trades at $31.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GT currently has a P/E ratio of 65.55, whereas GTX's P/E ratio is 18.43. In terms of profitability, GT's ROE is -0.58%, compared to GTX's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, GT is more volatile compared to GTX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GT.Check GTX's competition here
Gentex Corporation (NASDAQ: GNTX)
GT vs GNTX Comparison July 2026
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ: GT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GT stands at 2.1B. In comparison, GNTX has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GT is priced at $7.21 on the NASDAQ, while GNTX trades at $22.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GT currently has a P/E ratio of 65.55, whereas GNTX's P/E ratio is 12.45. In terms of profitability, GT's ROE is -0.58%, compared to GNTX's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GT is less volatile compared to GNTX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GT.Check GNTX's competition here
Brunswick Corporation 6.500% Se (NYSE: BC-PA)
GT vs BC-PA Comparison July 2026
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ: GT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GT stands at 2.1B. In comparison, BC-PA has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GT is priced at $7.21 on the NASDAQ, while BC-PA trades at $74.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GT currently has a P/E ratio of 65.55, whereas BC-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GT's ROE is -0.58%, compared to BC-PA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GT is more volatile compared to BC-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GT.Check BC-PA's competition here
Dorman Products, Inc. (NASDAQ: DORM)
GT vs DORM Comparison July 2026
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ: GT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GT stands at 2.1B. In comparison, DORM has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, GT is priced at $7.21 on the NASDAQ, while DORM trades at $134.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GT currently has a P/E ratio of 65.55, whereas DORM's P/E ratio is 15.72. In terms of profitability, GT's ROE is -0.58%, compared to DORM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GT is more volatile compared to DORM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GT.Check DORM's competition here
Brunswick Corporation 6.625% Se (NYSE: BC-PB)
GT vs BC-PB Comparison July 2026
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ: GT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GT stands at 2.1B. In comparison, BC-PB has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GT is priced at $7.21 on the NASDAQ, while BC-PB trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GT currently has a P/E ratio of 65.55, whereas BC-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GT's ROE is -0.58%, compared to BC-PB's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GT is more volatile compared to BC-PB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GT.Check BC-PB's competition here
Dana Incorporated (NYSE: DAN)
GT vs DAN Comparison July 2026
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ: GT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GT stands at 2.1B. In comparison, DAN has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GT is priced at $7.21 on the NASDAQ, while DAN trades at $27.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GT currently has a P/E ratio of 65.55, whereas DAN's P/E ratio is 31.62. In terms of profitability, GT's ROE is -0.58%, compared to DAN's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GT is less volatile compared to DAN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GT.Check DAN's competition here
QuantumScape Corporation (NASDAQ: QS)
GT vs QS Comparison July 2026
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ: GT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GT stands at 2.1B. In comparison, QS has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, GT is priced at $7.21 on the NASDAQ, while QS trades at $4.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GT currently has a P/E ratio of 65.55, whereas QS's P/E ratio is -6.88. In terms of profitability, GT's ROE is -0.58%, compared to QS's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, GT is less volatile compared to QS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GT.Check QS's competition here
PHINIA Inc. (NYSE: PHIN)
GT vs PHIN Comparison July 2026
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ: GT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GT stands at 2.1B. In comparison, PHIN has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GT is priced at $7.21 on the NASDAQ, while PHIN trades at $78.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GT currently has a P/E ratio of 65.55, whereas PHIN's P/E ratio is 14.70. In terms of profitability, GT's ROE is -0.58%, compared to PHIN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GT is more volatile compared to PHIN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GT.Check PHIN's competition here
Visteon Corporation (NASDAQ: VC)
GT vs VC Comparison July 2026
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ: GT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GT stands at 2.1B. In comparison, VC has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GT is priced at $7.21 on the NASDAQ, while VC trades at $103.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GT currently has a P/E ratio of 65.55, whereas VC's P/E ratio is 11.34. In terms of profitability, GT's ROE is -0.58%, compared to VC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GT is less volatile compared to VC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GT.Check VC's competition here
Boyd Group Services Inc. (NYSE: BGSI)
GT vs BGSI Comparison July 2026
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ: GT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GT stands at 2.1B. In comparison, BGSI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GT is priced at $7.21 on the NASDAQ, while BGSI trades at $102.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GT currently has a P/E ratio of 65.55, whereas BGSI's P/E ratio is 48.24. In terms of profitability, GT's ROE is -0.58%, compared to BGSI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GT is more volatile compared to BGSI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GT.Check BGSI's competition here
Hesai Group (NASDAQ: HSAI)
GT vs HSAI Comparison July 2026
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ: GT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GT stands at 2.1B. In comparison, HSAI has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GT is priced at $7.21 on the NASDAQ, while HSAI trades at $14.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GT currently has a P/E ratio of 65.55, whereas HSAI's P/E ratio is 33.18. In terms of profitability, GT's ROE is -0.58%, compared to HSAI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GT is less volatile compared to HSAI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GT.Check HSAI's competition here
Adient plc (NYSE: ADNT)
GT vs ADNT Comparison July 2026
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ: GT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GT stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ADNT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GT is priced at $7.21 on the NASDAQ, while ADNT trades at $20.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GT currently has a P/E ratio of 65.55, whereas ADNT's P/E ratio is 11.09. In terms of profitability, GT's ROE is -0.58%, compared to ADNT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GT is more volatile compared to ADNT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GT.Check ADNT's competition here
Gentherm Incorporated (NASDAQ: THRM)
GT vs THRM Comparison July 2026
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ: GT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GT stands at 2.1B. In comparison, THRM has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GT is priced at $7.21 on the NASDAQ, while THRM trades at $42.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GT currently has a P/E ratio of 65.55, whereas THRM's P/E ratio is 16.42. In terms of profitability, GT's ROE is -0.58%, compared to THRM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GT is less volatile compared to THRM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GT.Check THRM's competition here
XPEL, Inc. (NASDAQ: XPEL)
GT vs XPEL Comparison July 2026
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ: GT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GT stands at 2.1B. In comparison, XPEL has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GT is priced at $7.21 on the NASDAQ, while XPEL trades at $42.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GT currently has a P/E ratio of 65.55, whereas XPEL's P/E ratio is 22.37. In terms of profitability, GT's ROE is -0.58%, compared to XPEL's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GT is less volatile compared to XPEL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GT.Check XPEL's competition here
American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: AXL)
GT vs AXL Comparison July 2026
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ: GT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GT stands at 2.1B. In comparison, AXL has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, GT is priced at $7.21 on the NASDAQ, while AXL trades at $8.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GT currently has a P/E ratio of 65.55, whereas AXL's P/E ratio is 23.30. In terms of profitability, GT's ROE is -0.58%, compared to AXL's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GT is less volatile compared to AXL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GT.Check AXL's competition here
Standard Motor Products, Inc. (NYSE: SMP)
GT vs SMP Comparison July 2026
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ: GT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GT stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SMP has a market cap of 860.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GT is priced at $7.21 on the NASDAQ, while SMP trades at $38.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GT currently has a P/E ratio of 65.55, whereas SMP's P/E ratio is 9.59. In terms of profitability, GT's ROE is -0.58%, compared to SMP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GT is more volatile compared to SMP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GT.Check SMP's competition here
Fox Factory Holding Corp. (NASDAQ: FOXF)
GT vs FOXF Comparison July 2026
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ: GT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GT stands at 2.1B. In comparison, FOXF has a market cap of 776.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GT is priced at $7.21 on the NASDAQ, while FOXF trades at $18.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GT currently has a P/E ratio of 65.55, whereas FOXF's P/E ratio is 18.33. In terms of profitability, GT's ROE is -0.58%, compared to FOXF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, GT is less volatile compared to FOXF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GT.Check FOXF's competition here
Hyliion Holdings Corp. (AMEX: HYLN)
GT vs HYLN Comparison July 2026
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ: GT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GT stands at 2.1B. In comparison, HYLN has a market cap of 661.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GT is priced at $7.21 on the NASDAQ, while HYLN trades at $3.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GT currently has a P/E ratio of 65.55, whereas HYLN's P/E ratio is -12.37. In terms of profitability, GT's ROE is -0.58%, compared to HYLN's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GT is less volatile compared to HYLN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GT.Check HYLN's competition here
Dauch Corp. (NYSE: DCH)
GT vs DCH Comparison July 2026
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ: GT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GT stands at 2.1B. In comparison, DCH has a market cap of 649.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GT is priced at $7.21 on the NASDAQ, while DCH trades at $5.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GT currently has a P/E ratio of 65.55, whereas DCH's P/E ratio is 7.03. In terms of profitability, GT's ROE is -0.58%, compared to DCH's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GT is less volatile compared to DCH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GT.Check DCH's competition here
Miller Industries, Inc. (NYSE: MLR)
GT vs MLR Comparison July 2026
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ: GT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GT stands at 2.1B. In comparison, MLR has a market cap of 585.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GT is priced at $7.21 on the NASDAQ, while MLR trades at $51.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GT currently has a P/E ratio of 65.55, whereas MLR's P/E ratio is 38.35. In terms of profitability, GT's ROE is -0.58%, compared to MLR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GT is more volatile compared to MLR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GT.Check MLR's competition here
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTXAP)
GT vs GTXAP Comparison July 2026
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ: GT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GT stands at 2.1B. In comparison, GTXAP has a market cap of 557.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GT is priced at $7.21 on the NASDAQ, while GTXAP trades at $8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GT currently has a P/E ratio of 65.55, whereas GTXAP's P/E ratio is 4.44. In terms of profitability, GT's ROE is -0.58%, compared to GTXAP's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, GT is more volatile compared to GTXAP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GT.Check GTXAP's competition here
Monro Inc. (NASDAQ: MNRO)
GT vs MNRO Comparison July 2026
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ: GT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GT stands at 2.1B. In comparison, MNRO has a market cap of 524.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GT is priced at $7.21 on the NASDAQ, while MNRO trades at $16.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GT currently has a P/E ratio of 65.55, whereas MNRO's P/E ratio is 39.05. In terms of profitability, GT's ROE is -0.58%, compared to MNRO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GT is less volatile compared to MNRO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GT.Check MNRO's competition here
Cooper-Standard Holdings Inc. (NYSE: CPS)
GT vs CPS Comparison July 2026
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ: GT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GT stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CPS has a market cap of 503.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GT is priced at $7.21 on the NASDAQ, while CPS trades at $28.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GT currently has a P/E ratio of 65.55, whereas CPS's P/E ratio is -12.90. In terms of profitability, GT's ROE is -0.58%, compared to CPS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, GT is less volatile compared to CPS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GT.Check CPS's competition here
Allego N.V. (NYSE: ALLG)
GT vs ALLG Comparison July 2026
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ: GT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GT stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ALLG has a market cap of 496.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GT is priced at $7.21 on the NASDAQ, while ALLG trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GT currently has a P/E ratio of 65.55, whereas ALLG's P/E ratio is -3.96. In terms of profitability, GT's ROE is -0.58%, compared to ALLG's ROE of +4.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GT is less volatile compared to ALLG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GT.Check ALLG's competition here
ECARX Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: ECXWW)
GT vs ECXWW Comparison July 2026
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ: GT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GT stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ECXWW has a market cap of 477.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GT is priced at $7.21 on the NASDAQ, while ECXWW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GT currently has a P/E ratio of 65.55, whereas ECXWW's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, GT's ROE is -0.58%, compared to ECXWW's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GT is less volatile compared to ECXWW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GT.Check ECXWW's competition here
Solid Power, Inc. (NASDAQ: SLDP)
GT vs SLDP Comparison July 2026
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ: GT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GT stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SLDP has a market cap of 384.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GT is priced at $7.21 on the NASDAQ, while SLDP trades at $2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GT currently has a P/E ratio of 65.55, whereas SLDP's P/E ratio is -4.33. In terms of profitability, GT's ROE is -0.58%, compared to SLDP's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GT is less volatile compared to SLDP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GT.Check SLDP's competition here
Holley Inc. WT (NYSE: HLLY-WT)
GT vs HLLY-WT Comparison July 2026
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ: GT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GT stands at 2.1B. In comparison, HLLY-WT has a market cap of 381.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GT is priced at $7.21 on the NASDAQ, while HLLY-WT trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GT currently has a P/E ratio of 65.55, whereas HLLY-WT's P/E ratio is 0.18. In terms of profitability, GT's ROE is -0.58%, compared to HLLY-WT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GT is less volatile compared to HLLY-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GT.Check HLLY-WT's competition here
Strattec Security Corporation (NASDAQ: STRT)
GT vs STRT Comparison July 2026
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ: GT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GT stands at 2.1B. In comparison, STRT has a market cap of 358.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GT is priced at $7.21 on the NASDAQ, while STRT trades at $85.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GT currently has a P/E ratio of 65.55, whereas STRT's P/E ratio is 12.45. In terms of profitability, GT's ROE is -0.58%, compared to STRT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GT is more volatile compared to STRT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GT.Check STRT's competition here
ECARX Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: ECX)
GT vs ECX Comparison July 2026
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ: GT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GT stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ECX has a market cap of 347M. Regarding current trading prices, GT is priced at $7.21 on the NASDAQ, while ECX trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GT currently has a P/E ratio of 65.55, whereas ECX's P/E ratio is -3.45. In terms of profitability, GT's ROE is -0.58%, compared to ECX's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GT is less volatile compared to ECX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GT.Check ECX's competition here
Holley Inc. (NYSE: HLLY)
GT vs HLLY Comparison July 2026
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ: GT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GT stands at 2.1B. In comparison, HLLY has a market cap of 314.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GT is priced at $7.21 on the NASDAQ, while HLLY trades at $2.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GT currently has a P/E ratio of 65.55, whereas HLLY's P/E ratio is 12.45. In terms of profitability, GT's ROE is -0.58%, compared to HLLY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GT is less volatile compared to HLLY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GT.Check HLLY's competition here
Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. (NASDAQ: MPAA)
GT vs MPAA Comparison July 2026
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ: GT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GT stands at 2.1B. In comparison, MPAA has a market cap of 261M. Regarding current trading prices, GT is priced at $7.21 on the NASDAQ, while MPAA trades at $13.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GT currently has a P/E ratio of 65.55, whereas MPAA's P/E ratio is 14.52. In terms of profitability, GT's ROE is -0.58%, compared to MPAA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GT is more volatile compared to MPAA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GT.Check MPAA's competition here
Aeva Technologies, Inc. Redeema (NYSE: AEVA-WT)
GT vs AEVA-WT Comparison July 2026
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ: GT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GT stands at 2.1B. In comparison, AEVA-WT has a market cap of 227.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GT is priced at $7.21 on the NASDAQ, while AEVA-WT trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GT currently has a P/E ratio of 65.55, whereas AEVA-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GT's ROE is -0.58%, compared to AEVA-WT's ROE of +6.92%. Regarding short-term risk, GT is more volatile compared to AEVA-WT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GT.Check AEVA-WT's competition here
Stoneridge, Inc. (NYSE: SRI)
GT vs SRI Comparison July 2026
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ: GT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GT stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SRI has a market cap of 209.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GT is priced at $7.21 on the NASDAQ, while SRI trades at $7.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GT currently has a P/E ratio of 65.55, whereas SRI's P/E ratio is -4.33. In terms of profitability, GT's ROE is -0.58%, compared to SRI's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, GT is less volatile compared to SRI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GT.Check SRI's competition here
SES AI Corporation (NYSE: SES)
GT vs SES Comparison July 2026
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ: GT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GT stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SES has a market cap of 183.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GT is priced at $7.21 on the NASDAQ, while SES trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GT currently has a P/E ratio of 65.55, whereas SES's P/E ratio is -2.52. In terms of profitability, GT's ROE is -0.58%, compared to SES's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GT is less volatile compared to SES. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GT.Check SES's competition here
Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: CVGI)
GT vs CVGI Comparison July 2026
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ: GT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GT stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CVGI has a market cap of 180.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GT is priced at $7.21 on the NASDAQ, while CVGI trades at $4.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GT currently has a P/E ratio of 65.55, whereas CVGI's P/E ratio is -9.06. In terms of profitability, GT's ROE is -0.58%, compared to CVGI's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GT is less volatile compared to CVGI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GT.Check CVGI's competition here
XL Fleet Corp. (NYSE: XL)
GT vs XL Comparison July 2026
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ: GT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GT stands at 2.1B. In comparison, XL has a market cap of 164.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GT is priced at $7.21 on the NASDAQ, while XL trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GT currently has a P/E ratio of 65.55, whereas XL's P/E ratio is -3.21. In terms of profitability, GT's ROE is -0.58%, compared to XL's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GT is less volatile compared to XL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GT.Check XL's competition here
Innoviz Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: INVZ)
GT vs INVZ Comparison July 2026
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ: GT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GT stands at 2.1B. In comparison, INVZ has a market cap of 135.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GT is priced at $7.21 on the NASDAQ, while INVZ trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GT currently has a P/E ratio of 65.55, whereas INVZ's P/E ratio is -1.85. In terms of profitability, GT's ROE is -0.58%, compared to INVZ's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GT is more volatile compared to INVZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GT.Check INVZ's competition here
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS)
GT vs CAAS Comparison July 2026
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ: GT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GT stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CAAS has a market cap of 131.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GT is priced at $7.21 on the NASDAQ, while CAAS trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GT currently has a P/E ratio of 65.55, whereas CAAS's P/E ratio is 3.07. In terms of profitability, GT's ROE is -0.58%, compared to CAAS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GT is more volatile compared to CAAS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GT.Check CAAS's competition here
AEye, Inc. (NASDAQ: LIDRW)
GT vs LIDRW Comparison July 2026
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ: GT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GT stands at 2.1B. In comparison, LIDRW has a market cap of 60.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GT is priced at $7.21 on the NASDAQ, while LIDRW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GT currently has a P/E ratio of 65.55, whereas LIDRW's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, GT's ROE is -0.58%, compared to LIDRW's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, GT is less volatile compared to LIDRW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GT.Check LIDRW's competition here
Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: KNDI)
GT vs KNDI Comparison July 2026
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ: GT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GT stands at 2.1B. In comparison, KNDI has a market cap of 54.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GT is priced at $7.21 on the NASDAQ, while KNDI trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GT currently has a P/E ratio of 65.55, whereas KNDI's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, GT's ROE is -0.58%, compared to KNDI's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GT is less volatile compared to KNDI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GT.Check KNDI's competition here
Gogoro Inc. (NASDAQ: GGROW)
GT vs GGROW Comparison July 2026
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ: GT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GT stands at 2.1B. In comparison, GGROW has a market cap of 52.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GT is priced at $7.21 on the NASDAQ, while GGROW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GT currently has a P/E ratio of 65.55, whereas GGROW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GT's ROE is -0.58%, compared to GGROW's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, GT is less volatile compared to GGROW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GT.Check GGROW's competition here
MKDWELL Tech Inc. (NASDAQ: MKDW)
GT vs MKDW Comparison July 2026
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ: GT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GT stands at 2.1B. In comparison, MKDW has a market cap of 49.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GT is priced at $7.21 on the NASDAQ, while MKDW trades at $11.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GT currently has a P/E ratio of 65.55, whereas MKDW's P/E ratio is -18.12. In terms of profitability, GT's ROE is -0.58%, compared to MKDW's ROE of -3.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GT is more volatile compared to MKDW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GT.Check MKDW's competition here
Westport Fuel Systems Inc. (NASDAQ: WPRT)
GT vs WPRT Comparison July 2026
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ: GT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GT stands at 2.1B. In comparison, WPRT has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GT is priced at $7.21 on the NASDAQ, while WPRT trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GT currently has a P/E ratio of 65.55, whereas WPRT's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, GT's ROE is -0.58%, compared to WPRT's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, GT is more volatile compared to WPRT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GT.Check WPRT's competition here
noco-noco Inc. (NASDAQ: NCNCW)
GT vs NCNCW Comparison July 2026
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ: GT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GT stands at 2.1B. In comparison, NCNCW has a market cap of 20.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GT is priced at $7.21 on the NASDAQ, while NCNCW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GT currently has a P/E ratio of 65.55, whereas NCNCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GT's ROE is -0.58%, compared to NCNCW's ROE of +3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GT is more volatile compared to NCNCW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GT.Check NCNCW's competition here
noco-noco Inc. (NASDAQ: NCNC)
GT vs NCNC Comparison July 2026
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ: GT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GT stands at 2.1B. In comparison, NCNC has a market cap of 20.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GT is priced at $7.21 on the NASDAQ, while NCNC trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GT currently has a P/E ratio of 65.55, whereas NCNC's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, GT's ROE is -0.58%, compared to NCNC's ROE of +3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GT is more volatile compared to NCNC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GT.Check NCNC's competition here
Atlis Motor Vehicles, Inc. (NASDAQ: AMV)
GT vs AMV Comparison July 2026
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ: GT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GT stands at 2.1B. In comparison, AMV has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GT is priced at $7.21 on the NASDAQ, while AMV trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GT currently has a P/E ratio of 65.55, whereas AMV's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, GT's ROE is -0.58%, compared to AMV's ROE of +15.75%. Regarding short-term risk, GT is less volatile compared to AMV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GT.Check AMV's competition here
SAG Holdings Ltd (NASDAQ: SAG)
GT vs SAG Comparison July 2026
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ: GT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GT stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SAG has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GT is priced at $7.21 on the NASDAQ, while SAG trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GT currently has a P/E ratio of 65.55, whereas SAG's P/E ratio is 6.73. In terms of profitability, GT's ROE is -0.58%, compared to SAG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GT is less volatile compared to SAG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GT.Check SAG's competition here
Superior Industries International, Inc. (NYSE: SUP)
GT vs SUP Comparison July 2026
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ: GT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GT stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SUP has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GT is priced at $7.21 on the NASDAQ, while SUP trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GT currently has a P/E ratio of 65.55, whereas SUP's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, GT's ROE is -0.58%, compared to SUP's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GT is less volatile compared to SUP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GT.Check SUP's competition here
INNEOVA Holdings Ltd (NASDAQ: INEO)
GT vs INEO Comparison July 2026
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ: GT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GT stands at 2.1B. In comparison, INEO has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GT is priced at $7.21 on the NASDAQ, while INEO trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GT currently has a P/E ratio of 65.55, whereas INEO's P/E ratio is -19.32. In terms of profitability, GT's ROE is -0.58%, compared to INEO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GT is less volatile compared to INEO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GT.Check INEO's competition here
Foresight Autonomous Holdings Ltd. (NASDAQ: FRSX)
GT vs FRSX Comparison July 2026
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ: GT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GT stands at 2.1B. In comparison, FRSX has a market cap of 5.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GT is priced at $7.21 on the NASDAQ, while FRSX trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GT currently has a P/E ratio of 65.55, whereas FRSX's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, GT's ROE is -0.58%, compared to FRSX's ROE of -1.89%. Regarding short-term risk, GT is more volatile compared to FRSX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GT.Check FRSX's competition here
Worksport Ltd. (NASDAQ: WKSP)
GT vs WKSP Comparison July 2026
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ: GT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GT stands at 2.1B. In comparison, WKSP has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GT is priced at $7.21 on the NASDAQ, while WKSP trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GT currently has a P/E ratio of 65.55, whereas WKSP's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, GT's ROE is -0.58%, compared to WKSP's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GT is less volatile compared to WKSP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GT.Check WKSP's competition here
REE Automotive Ltd. (NASDAQ: REE)
GT vs REE Comparison July 2026
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ: GT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GT stands at 2.1B. In comparison, REE has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GT is priced at $7.21 on the NASDAQ, while REE trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GT currently has a P/E ratio of 65.55, whereas REE's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, GT's ROE is -0.58%, compared to REE's ROE of -2.61%. Regarding short-term risk, GT is less volatile compared to REE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GT.Check REE's competition here
Unique Fabricating, Inc. (AMEX: UFAB)
GT vs UFAB Comparison July 2026
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ: GT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GT stands at 2.1B. In comparison, UFAB has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, GT is priced at $7.21 on the NASDAQ, while UFAB trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GT currently has a P/E ratio of 65.55, whereas UFAB's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, GT's ROE is -0.58%, compared to UFAB's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GT is less volatile compared to UFAB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GT.Check UFAB's competition here
Innoviz Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: INVZW)
GT vs INVZW Comparison July 2026
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ: GT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GT stands at 2.1B. In comparison, INVZW has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GT is priced at $7.21 on the NASDAQ, while INVZW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GT currently has a P/E ratio of 65.55, whereas INVZW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, GT's ROE is -0.58%, compared to INVZW's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GT is more volatile compared to INVZW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GT.Check INVZW's competition here
MKDWELL Tech Inc. (NASDAQ: MKDWW)
GT vs MKDWW Comparison July 2026
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ: GT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GT stands at 2.1B. In comparison, MKDWW has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GT is priced at $7.21 on the NASDAQ, while MKDWW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GT currently has a P/E ratio of 65.55, whereas MKDWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GT's ROE is -0.58%, compared to MKDWW's ROE of -3.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GT is less volatile compared to MKDWW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GT.Check MKDWW's competition here
Tema Photonics & Optical ETF (AMEX: LAZR)
GT vs LAZR Comparison July 2026
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ: GT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GT stands at 2.1B. In comparison, LAZR has a market cap of 775.2K. Regarding current trading prices, GT is priced at $7.21 on the NASDAQ, while LAZR trades at $38.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GT currently has a P/E ratio of 65.55, whereas LAZR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GT's ROE is -0.58%, compared to LAZR's ROE of +1.84%. Regarding short-term risk, GT is less volatile compared to LAZR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GT.Check LAZR's competition here
Carbon Revolution Public Limited Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: CREV)
GT vs CREV Comparison July 2026
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ: GT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GT stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CREV has a market cap of 775.2K. Regarding current trading prices, GT is priced at $7.21 on the NASDAQ, while CREV trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GT currently has a P/E ratio of 65.55, whereas CREV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GT's ROE is -0.58%, compared to CREV's ROE of +2.58%. Regarding short-term risk, GT is more volatile compared to CREV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GT.Check CREV's competition here
Worksport Ltd. (NASDAQ: WKSPW)
GT vs WKSPW Comparison July 2026
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ: GT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GT stands at 2.1B. In comparison, WKSPW has a market cap of 575.3K. Regarding current trading prices, GT is priced at $7.21 on the NASDAQ, while WKSPW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GT currently has a P/E ratio of 65.55, whereas WKSPW's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, GT's ROE is -0.58%, compared to WKSPW's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GT is less volatile compared to WKSPW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GT.Check WKSPW's competition here
HYZON Motors Inc (NASDAQ: HYZNW)
GT vs HYZNW Comparison July 2026
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ: GT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GT stands at 2.1B. In comparison, HYZNW has a market cap of 16.3K. Regarding current trading prices, GT is priced at $7.21 on the NASDAQ, while HYZNW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GT currently has a P/E ratio of 65.55, whereas HYZNW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GT's ROE is -0.58%, compared to HYZNW's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, GT is less volatile compared to HYZNW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GT.Check HYZNW's competition here
Carbon Revolution Public Limited Company Warrant (NASDAQ: CREVW)
GT vs CREVW Comparison July 2026
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ: GT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GT stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CREVW has a market cap of 6.6K. Regarding current trading prices, GT is priced at $7.21 on the NASDAQ, while CREVW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GT currently has a P/E ratio of 65.55, whereas CREVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GT's ROE is -0.58%, compared to CREVW's ROE of +2.58%. Regarding short-term risk, GT is more volatile compared to CREVW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GT.Check CREVW's competition here
Accuride Corporation (NYSE: ACW)
GT vs ACW Comparison July 2026
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ: GT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GT stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ACW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GT is priced at $7.21 on the NASDAQ, while ACW trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GT currently has a P/E ratio of 65.55, whereas ACW's P/E ratio is -9.29. In terms of profitability, GT's ROE is -0.58%, compared to ACW's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GT is more volatile compared to ACW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GT.Check ACW's competition here
Veoneer, Inc. (NYSE: VNE)
GT vs VNE Comparison July 2026
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ: GT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GT stands at 2.1B. In comparison, VNE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GT is priced at $7.21 on the NASDAQ, while VNE trades at $36.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GT currently has a P/E ratio of 65.55, whereas VNE's P/E ratio is -10.74. In terms of profitability, GT's ROE is -0.58%, compared to VNE's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, GT is more volatile compared to VNE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GT.Check VNE's competition here
Romeo Power, Inc. (NYSE: RMO)
GT vs RMO Comparison July 2026
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ: GT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GT stands at 2.1B. In comparison, RMO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GT is priced at $7.21 on the NASDAQ, while RMO trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GT currently has a P/E ratio of 65.55, whereas RMO's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, GT's ROE is -0.58%, compared to RMO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GT is less volatile compared to RMO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GT.Check RMO's competition here
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. (NASDAQ: GTPPP)
GT vs GTPPP Comparison July 2026
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ: GT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GT stands at 2.1B. In comparison, GTPPP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GT is priced at $7.21 on the NASDAQ, while GTPPP trades at $75.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GT currently has a P/E ratio of 65.55, whereas GTPPP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GT's ROE is -0.58%, compared to GTPPP's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, GT is more volatile compared to GTPPP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GT.Check GTPPP's competition here
Horizon Global Corporation (NYSE: HZN)
GT vs HZN Comparison July 2026
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ: GT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GT stands at 2.1B. In comparison, HZN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GT is priced at $7.21 on the NASDAQ, while HZN trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GT currently has a P/E ratio of 65.55, whereas HZN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GT's ROE is -0.58%, compared to HZN's ROE of +1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GT is more volatile compared to HZN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GT.Check HZN's competition here
Quantum Fuel Systems Technologies Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: QTWW)
GT vs QTWW Comparison July 2026
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ: GT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GT stands at 2.1B. In comparison, QTWW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GT is priced at $7.21 on the NASDAQ, while QTWW trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GT currently has a P/E ratio of 65.55, whereas QTWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GT's ROE is -0.58%, compared to QTWW's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, GT is less volatile compared to QTWW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GT.Check QTWW's competition here
Meritor, Inc. (NYSE: MTOR)
GT vs MTOR Comparison July 2026
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ: GT) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GT stands at 2.1B. In comparison, MTOR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GT is priced at $7.21 on the NASDAQ, while MTOR trades at $36.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GT currently has a P/E ratio of 65.55, whereas MTOR's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, GT's ROE is -0.58%, compared to MTOR's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, GT is more volatile compared to MTOR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GT.Check MTOR's competition here