Superior Industries International, Inc.
Superior Industries International, Inc. (SUP) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SUP) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUP | $0.32 | +6.14% | 9.6M | -0.08 | -$4.25 | N/A |
| ORLY | $92.37 | -0.93% | 78.1B | 31.36 | $2.97 | N/A |
| AZO | $3,582.93 | -0.40% | 59B | 25.08 | $142.80 | N/A |
| APTV-PA | $108.66 | +0.15% | 29.4B | 92.08 | $1.18 | N/A |
| MGA | $62.65 | +0.72% | 17.6B | 21.49 | $2.93 | +3.10% |
| MOD | $246.07 | -1.80% | 13.3B | 137.46 | $1.83 | N/A |
| APTV | $60.03 | -0.64% | 12.8B | 80.11 | $0.75 | N/A |
| BWA | $55.43 | -1.26% | 11.7B | 43.98 | $1.28 | +1.11% |
| ALSN | $135.15 | -0.62% | 11.3B | 18.48 | $7.33 | +0.81% |
| ALV | $116.19 | -0.10% | 8.8B | 12.68 | $9.29 | +2.80% |
Stock Comparison
SUP vs ORLY Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, ORLY has a market cap of 78.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while ORLY trades at $92.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas ORLY's P/E ratio is 31.36. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to ORLY's ROE of -2.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to ORLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check ORLY's competition here
SUP vs AZO Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, AZO has a market cap of 59B. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while AZO trades at $3,582.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas AZO's P/E ratio is 25.08. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to AZO's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to AZO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check AZO's competition here
SUP vs APTV-PA Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, APTV-PA has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while APTV-PA trades at $108.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas APTV-PA's P/E ratio is 92.08. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to APTV-PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to APTV-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check APTV-PA's competition here
SUP vs MGA Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, MGA has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while MGA trades at $62.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas MGA's P/E ratio is 21.49. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to MGA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to MGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check MGA's competition here
SUP vs MOD Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, MOD has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while MOD trades at $246.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas MOD's P/E ratio is 137.46. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to MOD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to MOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check MOD's competition here
SUP vs APTV Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, APTV has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while APTV trades at $60.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas APTV's P/E ratio is 80.11. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to APTV's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to APTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check APTV's competition here
SUP vs BWA Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, BWA has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while BWA trades at $55.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas BWA's P/E ratio is 43.98. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to BWA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to BWA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check BWA's competition here
SUP vs ALSN Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, ALSN has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while ALSN trades at $135.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas ALSN's P/E ratio is 18.48. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to ALSN's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to ALSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check ALSN's competition here
SUP vs ALV Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, ALV has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while ALV trades at $116.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas ALV's P/E ratio is 12.68. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to ALV's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to ALV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check ALV's competition here
SUP vs LKQ Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, LKQ has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while LKQ trades at $31.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas LKQ's P/E ratio is 13.68. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to LKQ's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to LKQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check LKQ's competition here
SUP vs MBLY Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, MBLY has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while MBLY trades at $9.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas MBLY's P/E ratio is -1.83. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to MBLY's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to MBLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check MBLY's competition here
SUP vs LEA Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, LEA has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while LEA trades at $125.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas LEA's P/E ratio is 15.77. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to LEA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to LEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check LEA's competition here
SUP vs DAN Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, DAN has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while DAN trades at $38.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas DAN's P/E ratio is -74.88. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to DAN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to DAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check DAN's competition here
SUP vs GNTX Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, GNTX has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while GNTX trades at $24.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas GNTX's P/E ratio is 13.72. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to GNTX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to GNTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check GNTX's competition here
SUP vs BC-PA Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, BC-PA has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while BC-PA trades at $74.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas BC-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to BC-PA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to BC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check BC-PA's competition here
SUP vs QS Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, QS has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while QS trades at $7.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas QS's P/E ratio is -10.17. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to QS's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is less volatile compared to QS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check QS's competition here
SUP vs GTX Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, GTX has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while GTX trades at $21.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas GTX's P/E ratio is 13.82. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to GTX's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to GTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check GTX's competition here
SUP vs TMH Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, TMH has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while TMH trades at $52.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas TMH's P/E ratio is 10.94. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to TMH's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to TMH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check TMH's competition here
SUP vs BC-PB Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, BC-PB has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while BC-PB trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas BC-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to BC-PB's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to BC-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check BC-PB's competition here
SUP vs DORM Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, DORM has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while DORM trades at $110.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas DORM's P/E ratio is 16.75. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to DORM's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to DORM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check DORM's competition here
SUP vs VC Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, VC has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while VC trades at $114.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas VC's P/E ratio is 19.01. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to VC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to VC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check VC's competition here
SUP vs HSAI Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, HSAI has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while HSAI trades at $23.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas HSAI's P/E ratio is 50.77. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to HSAI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to HSAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check HSAI's competition here
SUP vs PHIN Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, PHIN has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while PHIN trades at $72.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas PHIN's P/E ratio is 22.73. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to PHIN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to PHIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check PHIN's competition here
SUP vs VGNT Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, VGNT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while VGNT trades at $34.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas VGNT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to VGNT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to VGNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check VGNT's competition here
SUP vs GT Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, GT has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while GT trades at $7.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas GT's P/E ratio is -1.18. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to GT's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to GT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check GT's competition here
SUP vs ADNT Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, ADNT has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while ADNT trades at $21.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas ADNT's P/E ratio is -6.03. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to ADNT's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to ADNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check ADNT's competition here
SUP vs XPEL Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, XPEL has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while XPEL trades at $46.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas XPEL's P/E ratio is 25.21. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to XPEL's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to XPEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check XPEL's competition here
SUP vs PLOW Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, PLOW has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while PLOW trades at $45.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas PLOW's P/E ratio is 23.67. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to PLOW's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is less volatile compared to PLOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check PLOW's competition here
SUP vs AXL Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, AXL has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while AXL trades at $8.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas AXL's P/E ratio is 23.30. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to AXL's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is less volatile compared to AXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check AXL's competition here
SUP vs AEVA Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, AEVA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while AEVA trades at $16.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas AEVA's P/E ratio is -6.34. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to AEVA's ROE of +198.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is less volatile compared to AEVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check AEVA's competition here
SUP vs THRM Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, THRM has a market cap of 933.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while THRM trades at $30.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas THRM's P/E ratio is 41.73. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to THRM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to THRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check THRM's competition here
SUP vs SMP Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, SMP has a market cap of 854.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while SMP trades at $38.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas SMP's P/E ratio is 10.96. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to SMP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to SMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check SMP's competition here
SUP vs FOXF Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, FOXF has a market cap of 742.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while FOXF trades at $16.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas FOXF's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to FOXF's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to FOXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check FOXF's competition here
SUP vs CPS Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, CPS has a market cap of 571.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while CPS trades at $31.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas CPS's P/E ratio is -139.96. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to CPS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to CPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check CPS's competition here
SUP vs GTXAP Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, GTXAP has a market cap of 557.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while GTXAP trades at $8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas GTXAP's P/E ratio is 4.44. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to GTXAP's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to GTXAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check GTXAP's competition here
SUP vs MLR Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, MLR has a market cap of 542.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while MLR trades at $47.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas MLR's P/E ratio is 24.09. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to MLR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to MLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check MLR's competition here
SUP vs MNRO Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, MNRO has a market cap of 513.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while MNRO trades at $17.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas MNRO's P/E ratio is -35.67. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to MNRO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to MNRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check MNRO's competition here
SUP vs ALLG Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, ALLG has a market cap of 496.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while ALLG trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas ALLG's P/E ratio is -3.96. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to ALLG's ROE of +4.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is less volatile compared to ALLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check ALLG's competition here
SUP vs SES Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, SES has a market cap of 413.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while SES trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas SES's P/E ratio is -5.20. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to SES's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is less volatile compared to SES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check SES's competition here
SUP vs HLLY Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, HLLY has a market cap of 408.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while HLLY trades at $3.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas HLLY's P/E ratio is 21.31. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to HLLY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to HLLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check HLLY's competition here
SUP vs ECX Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, ECX has a market cap of 380.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while ECX trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas ECX's P/E ratio is -5.67. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to ECX's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to ECX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check ECX's competition here
SUP vs HYLN Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, HYLN has a market cap of 340.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while HYLN trades at $1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas HYLN's P/E ratio is -5.80. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to HYLN's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to HYLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check HYLN's competition here
SUP vs STRT Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, STRT has a market cap of 319.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while STRT trades at $75.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas STRT's P/E ratio is 11.58. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to STRT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to STRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check STRT's competition here
SUP vs AEVA-WT Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, AEVA-WT has a market cap of 227.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while AEVA-WT trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas AEVA-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to AEVA-WT's ROE of +198.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to AEVA-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check AEVA-WT's competition here
SUP vs MPAA Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, MPAA has a market cap of 221.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while MPAA trades at $11.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas MPAA's P/E ratio is 127.89. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to MPAA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to MPAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check MPAA's competition here
SUP vs SRI Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, SRI has a market cap of 183M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while SRI trades at $6.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas SRI's P/E ratio is -1.76. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to SRI's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to SRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check SRI's competition here
SUP vs XL Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, XL has a market cap of 164.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while XL trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas XL's P/E ratio is -3.21. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to XL's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is less volatile compared to XL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check XL's competition here
SUP vs CVGI Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, CVGI has a market cap of 155.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while CVGI trades at $4.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas CVGI's P/E ratio is -6.97. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to CVGI's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to CVGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check CVGI's competition here
SUP vs INVZ Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, INVZ has a market cap of 147.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while INVZ trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas INVZ's P/E ratio is -2.03. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to INVZ's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is less volatile compared to INVZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check INVZ's competition here
SUP vs CAAS Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, CAAS has a market cap of 134.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while CAAS trades at $4.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas CAAS's P/E ratio is 3.13. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to CAAS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to CAAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check CAAS's competition here
SUP vs LIDR Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, LIDR has a market cap of 99.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while LIDR trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas LIDR's P/E ratio is -1.49. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to LIDR's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is less volatile compared to LIDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check LIDR's competition here
SUP vs SYPR Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, SYPR has a market cap of 86.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while SYPR trades at $3.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas SYPR's P/E ratio is -13.36. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to SYPR's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to SYPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check SYPR's competition here
SUP vs KNDI Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, KNDI has a market cap of 63.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while KNDI trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas KNDI's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to KNDI's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is less volatile compared to KNDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check KNDI's competition here
SUP vs GGR Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, GGR has a market cap of 61M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while GGR trades at $4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas GGR's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to GGR's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to GGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check GGR's competition here
SUP vs MKDW Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, MKDW has a market cap of 35M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while MKDW trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas MKDW's P/E ratio is -2.76. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to MKDW's ROE of +1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to MKDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check MKDW's competition here
SUP vs WPRT Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, WPRT has a market cap of 34.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while WPRT trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas WPRT's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to WPRT's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to WPRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check WPRT's competition here
SUP vs NCNCW Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, NCNCW has a market cap of 20.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while NCNCW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas NCNCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to NCNCW's ROE of +3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to NCNCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check NCNCW's competition here
SUP vs NCNC Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, NCNC has a market cap of 20.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while NCNC trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas NCNC's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to NCNC's ROE of +3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to NCNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check NCNC's competition here
SUP vs AMV Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, AMV has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while AMV trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas AMV's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to AMV's ROE of +2.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to AMV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check AMV's competition here
SUP vs ECXWW Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, ECXWW has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while ECXWW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas ECXWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to ECXWW's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is less volatile compared to ECXWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check ECXWW's competition here
SUP vs SAG Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, SAG has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while SAG trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas SAG's P/E ratio is 6.73. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to SAG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is less volatile compared to SAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check SAG's competition here
SUP vs AIIO Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, AIIO has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while AIIO trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas AIIO's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to AIIO's ROE of -160.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is less volatile compared to AIIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check AIIO's competition here
SUP vs FRSX Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, FRSX has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while FRSX trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas FRSX's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to FRSX's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is less volatile compared to FRSX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check FRSX's competition here
SUP vs INEO Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, INEO has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while INEO trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas INEO's P/E ratio is -8.31. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to INEO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is less volatile compared to INEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check INEO's competition here
SUP vs WKSP Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, WKSP has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while WKSP trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas WKSP's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to WKSP's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is less volatile compared to WKSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check WKSP's competition here
SUP vs HLLY-WT Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, HLLY-WT has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while HLLY-WT trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas HLLY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to HLLY-WT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is less volatile compared to HLLY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check HLLY-WT's competition here
SUP vs LIDRW Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, LIDRW has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while LIDRW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas LIDRW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to LIDRW's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is less volatile compared to LIDRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check LIDRW's competition here
SUP vs UFAB Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, UFAB has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while UFAB trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas UFAB's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to UFAB's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is less volatile compared to UFAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check UFAB's competition here
SUP vs INVZW Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, INVZW has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while INVZW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas INVZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to INVZW's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to INVZW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check INVZW's competition here
SUP vs MKDWW Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, MKDWW has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while MKDWW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas MKDWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to MKDWW's ROE of +1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to MKDWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check MKDWW's competition here
SUP vs CREV Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, CREV has a market cap of 775.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while CREV trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas CREV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to CREV's ROE of +2.58%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to CREV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check CREV's competition here
SUP vs WKSPW Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, WKSPW has a market cap of 575.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while WKSPW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas WKSPW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to WKSPW's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is less volatile compared to WKSPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check WKSPW's competition here
SUP vs GGROW Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, GGROW has a market cap of 100.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while GGROW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas GGROW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to GGROW's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is less volatile compared to GGROW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check GGROW's competition here
SUP vs HYZNW Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, HYZNW has a market cap of 16.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while HYZNW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas HYZNW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to HYZNW's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is less volatile compared to HYZNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check HYZNW's competition here
SUP vs CREVW Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, CREVW has a market cap of 6.6K. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while CREVW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas CREVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to CREVW's ROE of +2.58%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to CREVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check CREVW's competition here
SUP vs RMO Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, RMO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while RMO trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas RMO's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to RMO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is less volatile compared to RMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check RMO's competition here
SUP vs QTWW Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, QTWW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while QTWW trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas QTWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to QTWW's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is less volatile compared to QTWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check QTWW's competition here
SUP vs ACW Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, ACW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while ACW trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas ACW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to ACW's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to ACW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check ACW's competition here
SUP vs GTPPP Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, GTPPP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while GTPPP trades at $75.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas GTPPP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to GTPPP's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to GTPPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check GTPPP's competition here
SUP vs VNE Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, VNE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while VNE trades at $36.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas VNE's P/E ratio is -10.74. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to VNE's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to VNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check VNE's competition here
SUP vs HZN Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, HZN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while HZN trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas HZN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to HZN's ROE of +1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to HZN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check HZN's competition here
SUP vs MTOR Comparison April 2026
SUP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUP stands at 9.6M. In comparison, MTOR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SUP is priced at $0.32, while MTOR trades at $36.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas MTOR's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, SUP's ROE is +1.78%, compared to MTOR's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SUP is more volatile compared to MTOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUP.Check MTOR's competition here