Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See GTX's competitors and their performance on the NASDAQ and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for GTX and its NASDAQ peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTX | $29.60 | -6.08% | 5.8B | 18.01 | $1.71 | +0.98% |
| APTV-PA | $108.66 | +0.15% | 29.4B | 92.08 | $1.18 | N/A |
| MGA | $69.28 | +5.51% | 18.3B | 10.61 | $6.33 | +2.93% |
| BWA | $63.07 | -2.06% | 13.1B | 12.63 | $5.04 | +1.07% |
| APTV | $58.93 | +4.20% | 12.2B | 7.31 | $7.86 | N/A |
| ALSN | $121.26 | -0.89% | 10.1B | 18.96 | $6.43 | +0.93% |
| ALV | $123.17 | +4.83% | 8.8B | 12.25 | $9.77 | +2.90% |
| LEA | $149.28 | +3.96% | 7.3B | 10.70 | $13.54 | +2.13% |
| LKQ | $26.75 | +3.58% | 6.7B | 8.84 | $2.97 | +4.57% |
| MBLY | $8.43 | +4.72% | 6.5B | 20.02 | $0.40 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
Aptiv PLC (NYSE: APTV-PA)
GTX vs APTV-PA Comparison July 2026
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTX stands at 5.8B. In comparison, APTV-PA has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GTX is priced at $29.60 on the NASDAQ, while APTV-PA trades at $108.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.01, whereas APTV-PA's P/E ratio is 92.08. In terms of profitability, GTX's ROE is -0.43%, compared to APTV-PA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GTX is more volatile compared to APTV-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTX.Check APTV-PA's competition here
Magna International Inc. (NYSE: MGA)
GTX vs MGA Comparison July 2026
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTX stands at 5.8B. In comparison, MGA has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GTX is priced at $29.60 on the NASDAQ, while MGA trades at $69.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.01, whereas MGA's P/E ratio is 10.61. In terms of profitability, GTX's ROE is -0.43%, compared to MGA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GTX is more volatile compared to MGA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTX.Check MGA's competition here
BorgWarner Inc. (NYSE: BWA)
GTX vs BWA Comparison July 2026
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTX stands at 5.8B. In comparison, BWA has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GTX is priced at $29.60 on the NASDAQ, while BWA trades at $63.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.01, whereas BWA's P/E ratio is 12.63. In terms of profitability, GTX's ROE is -0.43%, compared to BWA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GTX is more volatile compared to BWA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTX.Check BWA's competition here
Aptiv PLC (NYSE: APTV)
GTX vs APTV Comparison July 2026
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTX stands at 5.8B. In comparison, APTV has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GTX is priced at $29.60 on the NASDAQ, while APTV trades at $58.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.01, whereas APTV's P/E ratio is 7.31. In terms of profitability, GTX's ROE is -0.43%, compared to APTV's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GTX is more volatile compared to APTV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTX.Check APTV's competition here
Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ALSN)
GTX vs ALSN Comparison July 2026
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTX stands at 5.8B. In comparison, ALSN has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GTX is priced at $29.60 on the NASDAQ, while ALSN trades at $121.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.01, whereas ALSN's P/E ratio is 18.96. In terms of profitability, GTX's ROE is -0.43%, compared to ALSN's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GTX is more volatile compared to ALSN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTX.Check ALSN's competition here
Autoliv, Inc. (NYSE: ALV)
GTX vs ALV Comparison July 2026
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTX stands at 5.8B. In comparison, ALV has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GTX is priced at $29.60 on the NASDAQ, while ALV trades at $123.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.01, whereas ALV's P/E ratio is 12.25. In terms of profitability, GTX's ROE is -0.43%, compared to ALV's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GTX is more volatile compared to ALV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTX.Check ALV's competition here
Lear Corporation (NYSE: LEA)
GTX vs LEA Comparison July 2026
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTX stands at 5.8B. In comparison, LEA has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GTX is priced at $29.60 on the NASDAQ, while LEA trades at $149.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.01, whereas LEA's P/E ratio is 10.70. In terms of profitability, GTX's ROE is -0.43%, compared to LEA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GTX is more volatile compared to LEA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTX.Check LEA's competition here
LKQ Corporation (NASDAQ: LKQ)
GTX vs LKQ Comparison July 2026
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTX stands at 5.8B. In comparison, LKQ has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GTX is priced at $29.60 on the NASDAQ, while LKQ trades at $26.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.01, whereas LKQ's P/E ratio is 8.84. In terms of profitability, GTX's ROE is -0.43%, compared to LKQ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GTX is more volatile compared to LKQ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTX.Check LKQ's competition here
Mobileye Global Inc. (NASDAQ: MBLY)
GTX vs MBLY Comparison July 2026
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTX stands at 5.8B. In comparison, MBLY has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GTX is priced at $29.60 on the NASDAQ, while MBLY trades at $8.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.01, whereas MBLY's P/E ratio is 20.02. In terms of profitability, GTX's ROE is -0.43%, compared to MBLY's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GTX is less volatile compared to MBLY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTX.Check MBLY's competition here
Gentex Corporation (NASDAQ: GNTX)
GTX vs GNTX Comparison July 2026
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTX stands at 5.8B. In comparison, GNTX has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GTX is priced at $29.60 on the NASDAQ, while GNTX trades at $23.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.01, whereas GNTX's P/E ratio is 12.46. In terms of profitability, GTX's ROE is -0.43%, compared to GNTX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GTX is more volatile compared to GNTX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTX.Check GNTX's competition here
Brunswick Corporation 6.500% Se (NYSE: BC-PA)
GTX vs BC-PA Comparison July 2026
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTX stands at 5.8B. In comparison, BC-PA has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GTX is priced at $29.60 on the NASDAQ, while BC-PA trades at $74.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.01, whereas BC-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTX's ROE is -0.43%, compared to BC-PA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GTX is more volatile compared to BC-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTX.Check BC-PA's competition here
Dorman Products, Inc. (NASDAQ: DORM)
GTX vs DORM Comparison July 2026
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTX stands at 5.8B. In comparison, DORM has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GTX is priced at $29.60 on the NASDAQ, while DORM trades at $141.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.01, whereas DORM's P/E ratio is 16.20. In terms of profitability, GTX's ROE is -0.43%, compared to DORM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GTX is more volatile compared to DORM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTX.Check DORM's competition here
Brunswick Corporation 6.625% Se (NYSE: BC-PB)
GTX vs BC-PB Comparison July 2026
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTX stands at 5.8B. In comparison, BC-PB has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GTX is priced at $29.60 on the NASDAQ, while BC-PB trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.01, whereas BC-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTX's ROE is -0.43%, compared to BC-PB's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GTX is more volatile compared to BC-PB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTX.Check BC-PB's competition here
Dana Incorporated (NYSE: DAN)
GTX vs DAN Comparison July 2026
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTX stands at 5.8B. In comparison, DAN has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GTX is priced at $29.60 on the NASDAQ, while DAN trades at $27.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.01, whereas DAN's P/E ratio is 31.84. In terms of profitability, GTX's ROE is -0.43%, compared to DAN's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GTX is more volatile compared to DAN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTX.Check DAN's competition here
QuantumScape Corporation (NASDAQ: QS)
GTX vs QS Comparison July 2026
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTX stands at 5.8B. In comparison, QS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GTX is priced at $29.60 on the NASDAQ, while QS trades at $5.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.01, whereas QS's P/E ratio is -7.30. In terms of profitability, GTX's ROE is -0.43%, compared to QS's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, GTX is less volatile compared to QS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTX.Check QS's competition here
Boyd Group Services Inc. (NYSE: BGSI)
GTX vs BGSI Comparison July 2026
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTX stands at 5.8B. In comparison, BGSI has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, GTX is priced at $29.60 on the NASDAQ, while BGSI trades at $114.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.01, whereas BGSI's P/E ratio is 51.32. In terms of profitability, GTX's ROE is -0.43%, compared to BGSI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GTX is more volatile compared to BGSI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTX.Check BGSI's competition here
PHINIA Inc. (NYSE: PHIN)
GTX vs PHIN Comparison July 2026
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTX stands at 5.8B. In comparison, PHIN has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GTX is priced at $29.60 on the NASDAQ, while PHIN trades at $80.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.01, whereas PHIN's P/E ratio is 14.73. In terms of profitability, GTX's ROE is -0.43%, compared to PHIN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GTX is more volatile compared to PHIN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTX.Check PHIN's competition here
Visteon Corporation (NASDAQ: VC)
GTX vs VC Comparison July 2026
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTX stands at 5.8B. In comparison, VC has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GTX is priced at $29.60 on the NASDAQ, while VC trades at $107.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.01, whereas VC's P/E ratio is 11.53. In terms of profitability, GTX's ROE is -0.43%, compared to VC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GTX is more volatile compared to VC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTX.Check VC's competition here
Hesai Group (NASDAQ: HSAI)
GTX vs HSAI Comparison July 2026
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTX stands at 5.8B. In comparison, HSAI has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GTX is priced at $29.60 on the NASDAQ, while HSAI trades at $16.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.01, whereas HSAI's P/E ratio is 35.07. In terms of profitability, GTX's ROE is -0.43%, compared to HSAI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GTX is more volatile compared to HSAI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTX.Check HSAI's competition here
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ: GT)
GTX vs GT Comparison July 2026
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTX stands at 5.8B. In comparison, GT has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, GTX is priced at $29.60 on the NASDAQ, while GT trades at $7.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.01, whereas GT's P/E ratio is 64.64. In terms of profitability, GTX's ROE is -0.43%, compared to GT's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, GTX is more volatile compared to GT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTX.Check GT's competition here
Adient plc (NYSE: ADNT)
GTX vs ADNT Comparison July 2026
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTX stands at 5.8B. In comparison, ADNT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GTX is priced at $29.60 on the NASDAQ, while ADNT trades at $21.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.01, whereas ADNT's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, GTX's ROE is -0.43%, compared to ADNT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GTX is more volatile compared to ADNT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTX.Check ADNT's competition here
Gentherm Incorporated (NASDAQ: THRM)
GTX vs THRM Comparison July 2026
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTX stands at 5.8B. In comparison, THRM has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GTX is priced at $29.60 on the NASDAQ, while THRM trades at $41.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.01, whereas THRM's P/E ratio is 16.18. In terms of profitability, GTX's ROE is -0.43%, compared to THRM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GTX is more volatile compared to THRM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTX.Check THRM's competition here
XPEL, Inc. (NASDAQ: XPEL)
GTX vs XPEL Comparison July 2026
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTX stands at 5.8B. In comparison, XPEL has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GTX is priced at $29.60 on the NASDAQ, while XPEL trades at $43.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.01, whereas XPEL's P/E ratio is 22.50. In terms of profitability, GTX's ROE is -0.43%, compared to XPEL's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GTX is more volatile compared to XPEL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTX.Check XPEL's competition here
American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: AXL)
GTX vs AXL Comparison July 2026
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTX stands at 5.8B. In comparison, AXL has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, GTX is priced at $29.60 on the NASDAQ, while AXL trades at $8.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.01, whereas AXL's P/E ratio is 23.30. In terms of profitability, GTX's ROE is -0.43%, compared to AXL's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GTX is less volatile compared to AXL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTX.Check AXL's competition here
Standard Motor Products, Inc. (NYSE: SMP)
GTX vs SMP Comparison July 2026
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTX stands at 5.8B. In comparison, SMP has a market cap of 867.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GTX is priced at $29.60 on the NASDAQ, while SMP trades at $40.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.01, whereas SMP's P/E ratio is 9.67. In terms of profitability, GTX's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SMP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GTX is more volatile compared to SMP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTX.Check SMP's competition here
Fox Factory Holding Corp. (NASDAQ: FOXF)
GTX vs FOXF Comparison July 2026
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTX stands at 5.8B. In comparison, FOXF has a market cap of 778.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GTX is priced at $29.60 on the NASDAQ, while FOXF trades at $19.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.01, whereas FOXF's P/E ratio is 18.39. In terms of profitability, GTX's ROE is -0.43%, compared to FOXF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, GTX is more volatile compared to FOXF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTX.Check FOXF's competition here
Hyliion Holdings Corp. (AMEX: HYLN)
GTX vs HYLN Comparison July 2026
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTX stands at 5.8B. In comparison, HYLN has a market cap of 680.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GTX is priced at $29.60 on the NASDAQ, while HYLN trades at $3.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.01, whereas HYLN's P/E ratio is -12.72. In terms of profitability, GTX's ROE is -0.43%, compared to HYLN's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GTX is less volatile compared to HYLN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTX.Check HYLN's competition here
Dauch Corp. (NYSE: DCH)
GTX vs DCH Comparison July 2026
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTX stands at 5.8B. In comparison, DCH has a market cap of 660.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GTX is priced at $29.60 on the NASDAQ, while DCH trades at $5.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.01, whereas DCH's P/E ratio is 7.15. In terms of profitability, GTX's ROE is -0.43%, compared to DCH's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GTX is more volatile compared to DCH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTX.Check DCH's competition here
Miller Industries, Inc. (NYSE: MLR)
GTX vs MLR Comparison July 2026
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTX stands at 5.8B. In comparison, MLR has a market cap of 584.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GTX is priced at $29.60 on the NASDAQ, while MLR trades at $51.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.01, whereas MLR's P/E ratio is 38.31. In terms of profitability, GTX's ROE is -0.43%, compared to MLR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GTX is more volatile compared to MLR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTX.Check MLR's competition here
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTXAP)
GTX vs GTXAP Comparison July 2026
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTX stands at 5.8B. In comparison, GTXAP has a market cap of 557.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GTX is priced at $29.60 on the NASDAQ, while GTXAP trades at $8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.01, whereas GTXAP's P/E ratio is 4.44. In terms of profitability, GTX's ROE is -0.43%, compared to GTXAP's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, GTX is more volatile compared to GTXAP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTX.Check GTXAP's competition here
Monro Inc. (NASDAQ: MNRO)
GTX vs MNRO Comparison July 2026
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTX stands at 5.8B. In comparison, MNRO has a market cap of 529.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GTX is priced at $29.60 on the NASDAQ, while MNRO trades at $17.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.01, whereas MNRO's P/E ratio is 39.40. In terms of profitability, GTX's ROE is -0.43%, compared to MNRO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GTX is more volatile compared to MNRO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTX.Check MNRO's competition here
Cooper-Standard Holdings Inc. (NYSE: CPS)
GTX vs CPS Comparison July 2026
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTX stands at 5.8B. In comparison, CPS has a market cap of 507.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GTX is priced at $29.60 on the NASDAQ, while CPS trades at $29.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.01, whereas CPS's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, GTX's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CPS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, GTX is more volatile compared to CPS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTX.Check CPS's competition here
Allego N.V. (NYSE: ALLG)
GTX vs ALLG Comparison July 2026
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTX stands at 5.8B. In comparison, ALLG has a market cap of 496.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GTX is priced at $29.60 on the NASDAQ, while ALLG trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.01, whereas ALLG's P/E ratio is -3.96. In terms of profitability, GTX's ROE is -0.43%, compared to ALLG's ROE of +4.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GTX is less volatile compared to ALLG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTX.Check ALLG's competition here
Solid Power, Inc. (NASDAQ: SLDP)
GTX vs SLDP Comparison July 2026
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTX stands at 5.8B. In comparison, SLDP has a market cap of 481.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GTX is priced at $29.60 on the NASDAQ, while SLDP trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.01, whereas SLDP's P/E ratio is -4.46. In terms of profitability, GTX's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SLDP's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GTX is less volatile compared to SLDP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTX.Check SLDP's competition here
ECARX Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: ECX)
GTX vs ECX Comparison July 2026
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTX stands at 5.8B. In comparison, ECX has a market cap of 374.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GTX is priced at $29.60 on the NASDAQ, while ECX trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.01, whereas ECX's P/E ratio is -3.72. In terms of profitability, GTX's ROE is -0.43%, compared to ECX's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GTX is more volatile compared to ECX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTX.Check ECX's competition here
Strattec Security Corporation (NASDAQ: STRT)
GTX vs STRT Comparison July 2026
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTX stands at 5.8B. In comparison, STRT has a market cap of 365.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GTX is priced at $29.60 on the NASDAQ, while STRT trades at $89.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.01, whereas STRT's P/E ratio is 12.71. In terms of profitability, GTX's ROE is -0.43%, compared to STRT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GTX is more volatile compared to STRT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTX.Check STRT's competition here
ECARX Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: ECXWW)
GTX vs ECXWW Comparison July 2026
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTX stands at 5.8B. In comparison, ECXWW has a market cap of 347M. Regarding current trading prices, GTX is priced at $29.60 on the NASDAQ, while ECXWW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.01, whereas ECXWW's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, GTX's ROE is -0.43%, compared to ECXWW's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GTX is less volatile compared to ECXWW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTX.Check ECXWW's competition here
Holley Inc. WT (NYSE: HLLY-WT)
GTX vs HLLY-WT Comparison July 2026
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTX stands at 5.8B. In comparison, HLLY-WT has a market cap of 344.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GTX is priced at $29.60 on the NASDAQ, while HLLY-WT trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.01, whereas HLLY-WT's P/E ratio is 0.16. In terms of profitability, GTX's ROE is -0.43%, compared to HLLY-WT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GTX is less volatile compared to HLLY-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTX.Check HLLY-WT's competition here
Holley Inc. (NYSE: HLLY)
GTX vs HLLY Comparison July 2026
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTX stands at 5.8B. In comparison, HLLY has a market cap of 320.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GTX is priced at $29.60 on the NASDAQ, while HLLY trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.01, whereas HLLY's P/E ratio is 12.67. In terms of profitability, GTX's ROE is -0.43%, compared to HLLY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GTX is more volatile compared to HLLY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTX.Check HLLY's competition here
Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. (NASDAQ: MPAA)
GTX vs MPAA Comparison July 2026
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTX stands at 5.8B. In comparison, MPAA has a market cap of 263.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GTX is priced at $29.60 on the NASDAQ, while MPAA trades at $14.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.01, whereas MPAA's P/E ratio is 14.66. In terms of profitability, GTX's ROE is -0.43%, compared to MPAA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GTX is more volatile compared to MPAA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTX.Check MPAA's competition here
Aeva Technologies, Inc. Redeema (NYSE: AEVA-WT)
GTX vs AEVA-WT Comparison July 2026
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTX stands at 5.8B. In comparison, AEVA-WT has a market cap of 227.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GTX is priced at $29.60 on the NASDAQ, while AEVA-WT trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.01, whereas AEVA-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTX's ROE is -0.43%, compared to AEVA-WT's ROE of +6.92%. Regarding short-term risk, GTX is more volatile compared to AEVA-WT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTX.Check AEVA-WT's competition here
Stoneridge, Inc. (NYSE: SRI)
GTX vs SRI Comparison July 2026
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTX stands at 5.8B. In comparison, SRI has a market cap of 210.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GTX is priced at $29.60 on the NASDAQ, while SRI trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.01, whereas SRI's P/E ratio is -4.36. In terms of profitability, GTX's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SRI's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, GTX is more volatile compared to SRI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTX.Check SRI's competition here
SES AI Corporation (NYSE: SES)
GTX vs SES Comparison July 2026
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTX stands at 5.8B. In comparison, SES has a market cap of 202M. Regarding current trading prices, GTX is priced at $29.60 on the NASDAQ, while SES trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.01, whereas SES's P/E ratio is -2.77. In terms of profitability, GTX's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SES's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GTX is less volatile compared to SES. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTX.Check SES's competition here
Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: CVGI)
GTX vs CVGI Comparison July 2026
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTX stands at 5.8B. In comparison, CVGI has a market cap of 177.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GTX is priced at $29.60 on the NASDAQ, while CVGI trades at $4.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.01, whereas CVGI's P/E ratio is -8.90. In terms of profitability, GTX's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CVGI's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GTX is less volatile compared to CVGI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTX.Check CVGI's competition here
XL Fleet Corp. (NYSE: XL)
GTX vs XL Comparison July 2026
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTX stands at 5.8B. In comparison, XL has a market cap of 164.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GTX is priced at $29.60 on the NASDAQ, while XL trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.01, whereas XL's P/E ratio is -3.21. In terms of profitability, GTX's ROE is -0.43%, compared to XL's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GTX is less volatile compared to XL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTX.Check XL's competition here
Innoviz Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: INVZ)
GTX vs INVZ Comparison July 2026
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTX stands at 5.8B. In comparison, INVZ has a market cap of 139.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GTX is priced at $29.60 on the NASDAQ, while INVZ trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.01, whereas INVZ's P/E ratio is -1.91. In terms of profitability, GTX's ROE is -0.43%, compared to INVZ's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GTX is less volatile compared to INVZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTX.Check INVZ's competition here
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS)
GTX vs CAAS Comparison July 2026
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTX stands at 5.8B. In comparison, CAAS has a market cap of 131.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GTX is priced at $29.60 on the NASDAQ, while CAAS trades at $4.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.01, whereas CAAS's P/E ratio is 3.08. In terms of profitability, GTX's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CAAS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GTX is more volatile compared to CAAS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTX.Check CAAS's competition here
Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: KNDI)
GTX vs KNDI Comparison July 2026
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTX stands at 5.8B. In comparison, KNDI has a market cap of 54.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GTX is priced at $29.60 on the NASDAQ, while KNDI trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.01, whereas KNDI's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, GTX's ROE is -0.43%, compared to KNDI's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GTX is more volatile compared to KNDI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTX.Check KNDI's competition here
Gogoro Inc. (NASDAQ: GGROW)
GTX vs GGROW Comparison July 2026
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTX stands at 5.8B. In comparison, GGROW has a market cap of 52.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GTX is priced at $29.60 on the NASDAQ, while GGROW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.01, whereas GGROW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTX's ROE is -0.43%, compared to GGROW's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, GTX is less volatile compared to GGROW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTX.Check GGROW's competition here
AEye, Inc. (NASDAQ: LIDRW)
GTX vs LIDRW Comparison July 2026
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTX stands at 5.8B. In comparison, LIDRW has a market cap of 52.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GTX is priced at $29.60 on the NASDAQ, while LIDRW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.01, whereas LIDRW's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, GTX's ROE is -0.43%, compared to LIDRW's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, GTX is less volatile compared to LIDRW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTX.Check LIDRW's competition here
MKDWELL Tech Inc. (NASDAQ: MKDW)
GTX vs MKDW Comparison July 2026
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTX stands at 5.8B. In comparison, MKDW has a market cap of 48.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GTX is priced at $29.60 on the NASDAQ, while MKDW trades at $11.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.01, whereas MKDW's P/E ratio is -17.77. In terms of profitability, GTX's ROE is -0.43%, compared to MKDW's ROE of -3.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GTX is less volatile compared to MKDW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTX.Check MKDW's competition here
Westport Fuel Systems Inc. (NASDAQ: WPRT)
GTX vs WPRT Comparison July 2026
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTX stands at 5.8B. In comparison, WPRT has a market cap of 33.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GTX is priced at $29.60 on the NASDAQ, while WPRT trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.01, whereas WPRT's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, GTX's ROE is -0.43%, compared to WPRT's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, GTX is more volatile compared to WPRT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTX.Check WPRT's competition here
noco-noco Inc. (NASDAQ: NCNCW)
GTX vs NCNCW Comparison July 2026
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTX stands at 5.8B. In comparison, NCNCW has a market cap of 20.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GTX is priced at $29.60 on the NASDAQ, while NCNCW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.01, whereas NCNCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTX's ROE is -0.43%, compared to NCNCW's ROE of +3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GTX is more volatile compared to NCNCW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTX.Check NCNCW's competition here
noco-noco Inc. (NASDAQ: NCNC)
GTX vs NCNC Comparison July 2026
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTX stands at 5.8B. In comparison, NCNC has a market cap of 20.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GTX is priced at $29.60 on the NASDAQ, while NCNC trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.01, whereas NCNC's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, GTX's ROE is -0.43%, compared to NCNC's ROE of +3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GTX is more volatile compared to NCNC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTX.Check NCNC's competition here
Atlis Motor Vehicles, Inc. (NASDAQ: AMV)
GTX vs AMV Comparison July 2026
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTX stands at 5.8B. In comparison, AMV has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GTX is priced at $29.60 on the NASDAQ, while AMV trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.01, whereas AMV's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, GTX's ROE is -0.43%, compared to AMV's ROE of +15.75%. Regarding short-term risk, GTX is less volatile compared to AMV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTX.Check AMV's competition here
SAG Holdings Ltd (NASDAQ: SAG)
GTX vs SAG Comparison July 2026
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTX stands at 5.8B. In comparison, SAG has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GTX is priced at $29.60 on the NASDAQ, while SAG trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.01, whereas SAG's P/E ratio is 6.73. In terms of profitability, GTX's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SAG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GTX is less volatile compared to SAG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTX.Check SAG's competition here
Superior Industries International, Inc. (NYSE: SUP)
GTX vs SUP Comparison July 2026
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTX stands at 5.8B. In comparison, SUP has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GTX is priced at $29.60 on the NASDAQ, while SUP trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.01, whereas SUP's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, GTX's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SUP's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GTX is less volatile compared to SUP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTX.Check SUP's competition here
INNEOVA Holdings Ltd (NASDAQ: INEO)
GTX vs INEO Comparison July 2026
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTX stands at 5.8B. In comparison, INEO has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GTX is priced at $29.60 on the NASDAQ, while INEO trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.01, whereas INEO's P/E ratio is -17.53. In terms of profitability, GTX's ROE is -0.43%, compared to INEO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GTX is less volatile compared to INEO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTX.Check INEO's competition here
Foresight Autonomous Holdings Ltd. (NASDAQ: FRSX)
GTX vs FRSX Comparison July 2026
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTX stands at 5.8B. In comparison, FRSX has a market cap of 5.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GTX is priced at $29.60 on the NASDAQ, while FRSX trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.01, whereas FRSX's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, GTX's ROE is -0.43%, compared to FRSX's ROE of -1.89%. Regarding short-term risk, GTX is less volatile compared to FRSX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTX.Check FRSX's competition here
Worksport Ltd. (NASDAQ: WKSP)
GTX vs WKSP Comparison July 2026
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTX stands at 5.8B. In comparison, WKSP has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GTX is priced at $29.60 on the NASDAQ, while WKSP trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.01, whereas WKSP's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, GTX's ROE is -0.43%, compared to WKSP's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GTX is less volatile compared to WKSP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTX.Check WKSP's competition here
REE Automotive Ltd. (NASDAQ: REE)
GTX vs REE Comparison July 2026
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTX stands at 5.8B. In comparison, REE has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GTX is priced at $29.60 on the NASDAQ, while REE trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.01, whereas REE's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, GTX's ROE is -0.43%, compared to REE's ROE of -2.61%. Regarding short-term risk, GTX is more volatile compared to REE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTX.Check REE's competition here
Unique Fabricating, Inc. (AMEX: UFAB)
GTX vs UFAB Comparison July 2026
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTX stands at 5.8B. In comparison, UFAB has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, GTX is priced at $29.60 on the NASDAQ, while UFAB trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.01, whereas UFAB's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, GTX's ROE is -0.43%, compared to UFAB's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GTX is less volatile compared to UFAB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTX.Check UFAB's competition here
MKDWELL Tech Inc. (NASDAQ: MKDWW)
GTX vs MKDWW Comparison July 2026
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTX stands at 5.8B. In comparison, MKDWW has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GTX is priced at $29.60 on the NASDAQ, while MKDWW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.01, whereas MKDWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTX's ROE is -0.43%, compared to MKDWW's ROE of -3.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GTX is less volatile compared to MKDWW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTX.Check MKDWW's competition here
Innoviz Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: INVZW)
GTX vs INVZW Comparison July 2026
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTX stands at 5.8B. In comparison, INVZW has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GTX is priced at $29.60 on the NASDAQ, while INVZW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.01, whereas INVZW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, GTX's ROE is -0.43%, compared to INVZW's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GTX is more volatile compared to INVZW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTX.Check INVZW's competition here
Carbon Revolution Public Limited Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: CREV)
GTX vs CREV Comparison July 2026
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTX stands at 5.8B. In comparison, CREV has a market cap of 775.2K. Regarding current trading prices, GTX is priced at $29.60 on the NASDAQ, while CREV trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.01, whereas CREV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GTX's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CREV's ROE of +2.58%. Regarding short-term risk, GTX is more volatile compared to CREV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTX.Check CREV's competition here
Tema Photonics & Optical ETF (AMEX: LAZR)
GTX vs LAZR Comparison July 2026
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTX stands at 5.8B. In comparison, LAZR has a market cap of 759K. Regarding current trading prices, GTX is priced at $29.60 on the NASDAQ, while LAZR trades at $34.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.01, whereas LAZR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTX's ROE is -0.43%, compared to LAZR's ROE of +1.84%. Regarding short-term risk, GTX is less volatile compared to LAZR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTX.Check LAZR's competition here
Worksport Ltd. (NASDAQ: WKSPW)
GTX vs WKSPW Comparison July 2026
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTX stands at 5.8B. In comparison, WKSPW has a market cap of 575.3K. Regarding current trading prices, GTX is priced at $29.60 on the NASDAQ, while WKSPW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.01, whereas WKSPW's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, GTX's ROE is -0.43%, compared to WKSPW's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GTX is less volatile compared to WKSPW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTX.Check WKSPW's competition here
HYZON Motors Inc (NASDAQ: HYZNW)
GTX vs HYZNW Comparison July 2026
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTX stands at 5.8B. In comparison, HYZNW has a market cap of 16.3K. Regarding current trading prices, GTX is priced at $29.60 on the NASDAQ, while HYZNW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.01, whereas HYZNW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GTX's ROE is -0.43%, compared to HYZNW's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, GTX is less volatile compared to HYZNW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTX.Check HYZNW's competition here
Carbon Revolution Public Limited Company Warrant (NASDAQ: CREVW)
GTX vs CREVW Comparison July 2026
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTX stands at 5.8B. In comparison, CREVW has a market cap of 6.6K. Regarding current trading prices, GTX is priced at $29.60 on the NASDAQ, while CREVW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.01, whereas CREVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTX's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CREVW's ROE of +2.58%. Regarding short-term risk, GTX is more volatile compared to CREVW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTX.Check CREVW's competition here
Accuride Corporation (NYSE: ACW)
GTX vs ACW Comparison July 2026
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTX stands at 5.8B. In comparison, ACW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GTX is priced at $29.60 on the NASDAQ, while ACW trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.01, whereas ACW's P/E ratio is -9.29. In terms of profitability, GTX's ROE is -0.43%, compared to ACW's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GTX is more volatile compared to ACW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTX.Check ACW's competition here
Veoneer, Inc. (NYSE: VNE)
GTX vs VNE Comparison July 2026
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTX stands at 5.8B. In comparison, VNE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GTX is priced at $29.60 on the NASDAQ, while VNE trades at $36.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.01, whereas VNE's P/E ratio is -10.74. In terms of profitability, GTX's ROE is -0.43%, compared to VNE's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, GTX is more volatile compared to VNE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTX.Check VNE's competition here
Romeo Power, Inc. (NYSE: RMO)
GTX vs RMO Comparison July 2026
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTX stands at 5.8B. In comparison, RMO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GTX is priced at $29.60 on the NASDAQ, while RMO trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.01, whereas RMO's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, GTX's ROE is -0.43%, compared to RMO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GTX is less volatile compared to RMO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTX.Check RMO's competition here
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. (NASDAQ: GTPPP)
GTX vs GTPPP Comparison July 2026
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTX stands at 5.8B. In comparison, GTPPP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GTX is priced at $29.60 on the NASDAQ, while GTPPP trades at $75.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.01, whereas GTPPP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTX's ROE is -0.43%, compared to GTPPP's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, GTX is more volatile compared to GTPPP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTX.Check GTPPP's competition here
Horizon Global Corporation (NYSE: HZN)
GTX vs HZN Comparison July 2026
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTX stands at 5.8B. In comparison, HZN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GTX is priced at $29.60 on the NASDAQ, while HZN trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.01, whereas HZN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTX's ROE is -0.43%, compared to HZN's ROE of +1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GTX is more volatile compared to HZN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTX.Check HZN's competition here
Quantum Fuel Systems Technologies Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: QTWW)
GTX vs QTWW Comparison July 2026
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTX stands at 5.8B. In comparison, QTWW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GTX is priced at $29.60 on the NASDAQ, while QTWW trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.01, whereas QTWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTX's ROE is -0.43%, compared to QTWW's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, GTX is less volatile compared to QTWW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTX.Check QTWW's competition here
Meritor, Inc. (NYSE: MTOR)
GTX vs MTOR Comparison July 2026
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTX stands at 5.8B. In comparison, MTOR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GTX is priced at $29.60 on the NASDAQ, while MTOR trades at $36.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.01, whereas MTOR's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, GTX's ROE is -0.43%, compared to MTOR's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, GTX is more volatile compared to MTOR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTX.Check MTOR's competition here