China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See CAAS's competitors and their performance on the NASDAQ and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for CAAS and its NASDAQ peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAAS | $5.04 | -0.20% | 152.1M | 3.55 | $1.42 | N/A |
| APTV-PA | $108.66 | +0.15% | 29.4B | 92.08 | $1.18 | N/A |
| GPC | $128.08 | -2.14% | 17.7B | 17.31 | $7.40 | +3.30% |
| MGA | $63.15 | -2.58% | 17.2B | 9.98 | $6.33 | +3.13% |
| BWA | $63.32 | -0.69% | 13B | 12.06 | $5.25 | +1.08% |
| ALSN | $117.10 | -1.30% | 9.9B | 18.96 | $6.32 | +0.97% |
| APTV | $43.59 | -0.07% | 9.2B | 5.92 | $7.37 | N/A |
| ALV | $116.98 | +0.96% | 8.6B | 12.03 | $9.77 | +2.99% |
| MBLY | $8.02 | -0.25% | 6.5B | 20.05 | $0.40 | N/A |
| LEA | $120.64 | -1.69% | 6B | 8.91 | $13.54 | +2.56% |
Stock Comparison
Aptiv PLC (NYSE: APTV-PA)
CAAS vs APTV-PA Comparison September 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, APTV-PA has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while APTV-PA trades at $108.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.55, whereas APTV-PA's P/E ratio is 92.08. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to APTV-PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is more volatile compared to APTV-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check APTV-PA's competition here
Genuine Parts Company (NYSE: GPC)
CAAS vs GPC Comparison September 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, GPC has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while GPC trades at $128.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.55, whereas GPC's P/E ratio is 17.31. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GPC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is more volatile compared to GPC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check GPC's competition here
Magna International Inc. (NYSE: MGA)
CAAS vs MGA Comparison September 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, MGA has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while MGA trades at $63.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.55, whereas MGA's P/E ratio is 9.98. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MGA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is more volatile compared to MGA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check MGA's competition here
BorgWarner Inc. (NYSE: BWA)
CAAS vs BWA Comparison September 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, BWA has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while BWA trades at $63.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.55, whereas BWA's P/E ratio is 12.06. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BWA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is more volatile compared to BWA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check BWA's competition here
Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ALSN)
CAAS vs ALSN Comparison September 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, ALSN has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while ALSN trades at $117.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.55, whereas ALSN's P/E ratio is 18.96. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ALSN's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is more volatile compared to ALSN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check ALSN's competition here
Aptiv PLC (NYSE: APTV)
CAAS vs APTV Comparison September 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, APTV has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while APTV trades at $43.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.55, whereas APTV's P/E ratio is 5.92. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to APTV's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is more volatile compared to APTV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check APTV's competition here
Autoliv, Inc. (NYSE: ALV)
CAAS vs ALV Comparison September 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, ALV has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while ALV trades at $116.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.55, whereas ALV's P/E ratio is 12.03. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ALV's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is more volatile compared to ALV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check ALV's competition here
Mobileye Global Inc. (NASDAQ: MBLY)
CAAS vs MBLY Comparison September 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, MBLY has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while MBLY trades at $8.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.55, whereas MBLY's P/E ratio is 20.05. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MBLY's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to MBLY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check MBLY's competition here
Lear Corporation (NYSE: LEA)
CAAS vs LEA Comparison September 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, LEA has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while LEA trades at $120.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.55, whereas LEA's P/E ratio is 8.91. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LEA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is more volatile compared to LEA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check LEA's competition here
LKQ Corporation (NASDAQ: LKQ)
CAAS vs LKQ Comparison September 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, LKQ has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while LKQ trades at $23.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.55, whereas LKQ's P/E ratio is 7.85. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LKQ's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is more volatile compared to LKQ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check LKQ's competition here
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX)
CAAS vs GTX Comparison September 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, GTX has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while GTX trades at $26.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.55, whereas GTX's P/E ratio is 14.43. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GTX's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is more volatile compared to GTX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check GTX's competition here
Brunswick Corporation 6.500% Se (NYSE: BC-PA)
CAAS vs BC-PA Comparison September 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, BC-PA has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while BC-PA trades at $74.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.55, whereas BC-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BC-PA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is more volatile compared to BC-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check BC-PA's competition here
Gentex Corporation (NASDAQ: GNTX)
CAAS vs GNTX Comparison September 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, GNTX has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while GNTX trades at $22.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.55, whereas GNTX's P/E ratio is 11.41. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GNTX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is more volatile compared to GNTX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check GNTX's competition here
Brunswick Corporation 6.625% Se (NYSE: BC-PB)
CAAS vs BC-PB Comparison September 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, BC-PB has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while BC-PB trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.55, whereas BC-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BC-PB's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is more volatile compared to BC-PB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check BC-PB's competition here
Dana Incorporated (NYSE: DAN)
CAAS vs DAN Comparison September 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, DAN has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while DAN trades at $29.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.55, whereas DAN's P/E ratio is 34.87. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DAN's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to DAN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check DAN's competition here
Dorman Products, Inc. (NASDAQ: DORM)
CAAS vs DORM Comparison September 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, DORM has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while DORM trades at $122.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.55, whereas DORM's P/E ratio is 12.97. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DORM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to DORM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check DORM's competition here
Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. (NYSE: ATMU)
CAAS vs ATMU Comparison September 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, ATMU has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while ATMU trades at $43.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.55, whereas ATMU's P/E ratio is 15.74. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ATMU's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is more volatile compared to ATMU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check ATMU's competition here
QuantumScape Corporation (NASDAQ: QS)
CAAS vs QS Comparison September 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, QS has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while QS trades at $5.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.55, whereas QS's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to QS's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to QS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check QS's competition here
Visteon Corporation (NASDAQ: VC)
CAAS vs VC Comparison September 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, VC has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while VC trades at $94.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.55, whereas VC's P/E ratio is 10.34. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to VC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check VC's competition here
Hesai Group (NASDAQ: HSAI)
CAAS vs HSAI Comparison September 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, HSAI has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while HSAI trades at $16.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.55, whereas HSAI's P/E ratio is 37.55. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HSAI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to HSAI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check HSAI's competition here
PHINIA Inc. (NYSE: PHIN)
CAAS vs PHIN Comparison September 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, PHIN has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while PHIN trades at $61.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.55, whereas PHIN's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PHIN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is more volatile compared to PHIN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check PHIN's competition here
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ: GT)
CAAS vs GT Comparison September 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, GT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while GT trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.55, whereas GT's P/E ratio is -15.30. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GT's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is more volatile compared to GT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check GT's competition here
Adient plc (NYSE: ADNT)
CAAS vs ADNT Comparison September 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, ADNT has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while ADNT trades at $17.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.55, whereas ADNT's P/E ratio is 9.89. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ADNT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to ADNT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check ADNT's competition here
Dauch Corp. (NYSE: DCH)
CAAS vs DCH Comparison September 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, DCH has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while DCH trades at $5.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.55, whereas DCH's P/E ratio is 7.55. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DCH's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to DCH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check DCH's competition here
China Yuchai International Limited (NYSE: CYD)
CAAS vs CYD Comparison September 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, CYD has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while CYD trades at $35.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.55, whereas CYD's P/E ratio is 12.49. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CYD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to CYD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check CYD's competition here
XPEL, Inc. (NASDAQ: XPEL)
CAAS vs XPEL Comparison September 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, XPEL has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while XPEL trades at $44.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.55, whereas XPEL's P/E ratio is 22.38. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to XPEL's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is more volatile compared to XPEL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check XPEL's competition here
Gentherm Incorporated (NASDAQ: THRM)
CAAS vs THRM Comparison September 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, THRM has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while THRM trades at $36.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.55, whereas THRM's P/E ratio is 13.98. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to THRM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to THRM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check THRM's competition here
American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: AXL)
CAAS vs AXL Comparison September 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, AXL has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while AXL trades at $8.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.55, whereas AXL's P/E ratio is 23.30. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AXL's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to AXL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check AXL's competition here
Standard Motor Products, Inc. (NYSE: SMP)
CAAS vs SMP Comparison September 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, SMP has a market cap of 818.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while SMP trades at $36.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.55, whereas SMP's P/E ratio is 8.88. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SMP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to SMP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check SMP's competition here
Fox Factory Holding Corp. (NASDAQ: FOXF)
CAAS vs FOXF Comparison September 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, FOXF has a market cap of 787.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while FOXF trades at $18.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.55, whereas FOXF's P/E ratio is 18.58. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FOXF's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to FOXF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check FOXF's competition here
Hyliion Holdings Corp. (AMEX: HYLN)
CAAS vs HYLN Comparison September 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, HYLN has a market cap of 750.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while HYLN trades at $4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.55, whereas HYLN's P/E ratio is -14.03. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HYLN's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to HYLN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check HYLN's competition here
Miller Industries, Inc. (NYSE: MLR)
CAAS vs MLR Comparison September 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, MLR has a market cap of 615.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while MLR trades at $53.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.55, whereas MLR's P/E ratio is 43.53. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MLR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to MLR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check MLR's competition here
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTXAP)
CAAS vs GTXAP Comparison September 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, GTXAP has a market cap of 557.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while GTXAP trades at $8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.55, whereas GTXAP's P/E ratio is 4.44. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GTXAP's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is more volatile compared to GTXAP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check GTXAP's competition here
Solid Power, Inc. (NASDAQ: SLDP)
CAAS vs SLDP Comparison September 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, SLDP has a market cap of 555.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while SLDP trades at $2.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.55, whereas SLDP's P/E ratio is -5.49. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SLDP's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to SLDP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check SLDP's competition here
Allego N.V. (NYSE: ALLG)
CAAS vs ALLG Comparison September 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, ALLG has a market cap of 496.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while ALLG trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.55, whereas ALLG's P/E ratio is -3.96. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ALLG's ROE of +4.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to ALLG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check ALLG's competition here
Cooper-Standard Holdings Inc. (NYSE: CPS)
CAAS vs CPS Comparison September 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, CPS has a market cap of 405.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while CPS trades at $22.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.55, whereas CPS's P/E ratio is -9.56. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CPS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is more volatile compared to CPS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check CPS's competition here
Monro Inc. (NASDAQ: MNRO)
CAAS vs MNRO Comparison September 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, MNRO has a market cap of 378.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while MNRO trades at $12.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.55, whereas MNRO's P/E ratio is 28.14. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MNRO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to MNRO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check MNRO's competition here
ECARX Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: ECX)
CAAS vs ECX Comparison September 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, ECX has a market cap of 360.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while ECX trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.55, whereas ECX's P/E ratio is -3.59. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ECX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to ECX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check ECX's competition here
Holley Inc. WT (NYSE: HLLY-WT)
CAAS vs HLLY-WT Comparison September 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, HLLY-WT has a market cap of 337.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while HLLY-WT trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.55, whereas HLLY-WT's P/E ratio is 0.15. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HLLY-WT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is more volatile compared to HLLY-WT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check HLLY-WT's competition here
Solid Power, Inc. (NASDAQ: SLDPW)
CAAS vs SLDPW Comparison September 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, SLDPW has a market cap of 333.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while SLDPW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.55, whereas SLDPW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SLDPW's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to SLDPW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check SLDPW's competition here
Holley Inc. (NYSE: HLLY)
CAAS vs HLLY Comparison September 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, HLLY has a market cap of 305.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while HLLY trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.55, whereas HLLY's P/E ratio is 7.94. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HLLY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to HLLY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check HLLY's competition here
Strattec Security Corporation (NASDAQ: STRT)
CAAS vs STRT Comparison September 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, STRT has a market cap of 282.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while STRT trades at $67.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.55, whereas STRT's P/E ratio is 9.81. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to STRT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is more volatile compared to STRT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check STRT's competition here
Aeva Technologies, Inc. Redeema (NYSE: AEVA-WT)
CAAS vs AEVA-WT Comparison September 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, AEVA-WT has a market cap of 227.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while AEVA-WT trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.55, whereas AEVA-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AEVA-WT's ROE of -2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is more volatile compared to AEVA-WT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check AEVA-WT's competition here
Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. (NASDAQ: MPAA)
CAAS vs MPAA Comparison September 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, MPAA has a market cap of 201.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while MPAA trades at $10.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.55, whereas MPAA's P/E ratio is 11.20. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MPAA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is more volatile compared to MPAA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check MPAA's competition here
SES AI Corporation (NYSE: SES)
CAAS vs SES Comparison September 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, SES has a market cap of 199.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while SES trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.55, whereas SES's P/E ratio is -3.22. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SES's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to SES. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check SES's competition here
Stoneridge, Inc. (NYSE: SRI)
CAAS vs SRI Comparison September 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, SRI has a market cap of 197.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while SRI trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.55, whereas SRI's P/E ratio is -4.27. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SRI's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to SRI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check SRI's competition here
ECARX Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: ECXWW)
CAAS vs ECXWW Comparison September 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, ECXWW has a market cap of 174.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while ECXWW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.55, whereas ECXWW's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ECXWW's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to ECXWW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check ECXWW's competition here
XL Fleet Corp. (NYSE: XL)
CAAS vs XL Comparison September 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, XL has a market cap of 164.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while XL trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.55, whereas XL's P/E ratio is -3.21. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to XL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to XL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check XL's competition here
SES AI Corporation (NYSE: SES-WT)
CAAS vs SES-WT Comparison September 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, SES-WT has a market cap of 123.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while SES-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.55, whereas SES-WT's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SES-WT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to SES-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check SES-WT's competition here
Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: CVGI)
CAAS vs CVGI Comparison September 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, CVGI has a market cap of 99.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while CVGI trades at $2.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.55, whereas CVGI's P/E ratio is -5.33. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CVGI's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is more volatile compared to CVGI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check CVGI's competition here
Innoviz Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: INVZ)
CAAS vs INVZ Comparison September 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, INVZ has a market cap of 95.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while INVZ trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.55, whereas INVZ's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to INVZ's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to INVZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check INVZ's competition here
Sypris Solutions, Inc. (NASDAQ: SYPR)
CAAS vs SYPR Comparison September 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, SYPR has a market cap of 39.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while SYPR trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.55, whereas SYPR's P/E ratio is -3.68. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SYPR's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to SYPR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check SYPR's competition here
Westport Fuel Systems Inc. (NASDAQ: WPRT)
CAAS vs WPRT Comparison September 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, WPRT has a market cap of 36.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while WPRT trades at $1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.55, whereas WPRT's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WPRT's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to WPRT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check WPRT's competition here
Kodiak AI, Inc. Warrants (NASDAQ: KDKRW)
CAAS vs KDKRW Comparison September 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, KDKRW has a market cap of 30.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while KDKRW trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.55, whereas KDKRW's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KDKRW's ROE of +27.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to KDKRW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check KDKRW's competition here
noco-noco Inc. (NASDAQ: NCNCW)
CAAS vs NCNCW Comparison September 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, NCNCW has a market cap of 20.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while NCNCW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.55, whereas NCNCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NCNCW's ROE of +3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is more volatile compared to NCNCW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check NCNCW's competition here
noco-noco Inc. (NASDAQ: NCNC)
CAAS vs NCNC Comparison September 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, NCNC has a market cap of 20.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while NCNC trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.55, whereas NCNC's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NCNC's ROE of +3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is more volatile compared to NCNC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check NCNC's competition here
Atlis Motor Vehicles, Inc. (NASDAQ: AMV)
CAAS vs AMV Comparison September 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, AMV has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while AMV trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.55, whereas AMV's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AMV's ROE of +15.75%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to AMV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check AMV's competition here
MKDWELL Tech Inc. (NASDAQ: MKDW)
CAAS vs MKDW Comparison September 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, MKDW has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while MKDW trades at $2.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.55, whereas MKDW's P/E ratio is -4.05. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MKDW's ROE of -3.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to MKDW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check MKDW's competition here
SAG Holdings Ltd (NASDAQ: SAG)
CAAS vs SAG Comparison September 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, SAG has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while SAG trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.55, whereas SAG's P/E ratio is 6.73. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SAG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to SAG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check SAG's competition here
Superior Industries International, Inc. (NYSE: SUP)
CAAS vs SUP Comparison September 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, SUP has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while SUP trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.55, whereas SUP's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SUP's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to SUP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check SUP's competition here
Worksport Ltd. (NASDAQ: WKSP)
CAAS vs WKSP Comparison September 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, WKSP has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while WKSP trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.55, whereas WKSP's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WKSP's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to WKSP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check WKSP's competition here
INNEOVA Holdings Ltd (NASDAQ: INEO)
CAAS vs INEO Comparison September 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, INEO has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while INEO trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.55, whereas INEO's P/E ratio is -13.57. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to INEO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to INEO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check INEO's competition here
REE Automotive Ltd. (NASDAQ: REE)
CAAS vs REE Comparison September 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, REE has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while REE trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.55, whereas REE's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to REE's ROE of -4.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to REE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check REE's competition here
Unique Fabricating, Inc. (AMEX: UFAB)
CAAS vs UFAB Comparison September 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, UFAB has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while UFAB trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.55, whereas UFAB's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to UFAB's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to UFAB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check UFAB's competition here
Foresight Autonomous Holdings Ltd. (NASDAQ: FRSX)
CAAS vs FRSX Comparison September 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, FRSX has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while FRSX trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.55, whereas FRSX's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FRSX's ROE of -3.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to FRSX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check FRSX's competition here
StableX Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: SBLX)
CAAS vs SBLX Comparison September 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, SBLX has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while SBLX trades at $2.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.55, whereas SBLX's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SBLX's ROE of -1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to SBLX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check SBLX's competition here
Innoviz Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: INVZW)
CAAS vs INVZW Comparison September 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, INVZW has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while INVZW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.55, whereas INVZW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to INVZW's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is more volatile compared to INVZW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check INVZW's competition here
MKDWELL Tech Inc. (NASDAQ: MKDWW)
CAAS vs MKDWW Comparison September 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, MKDWW has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while MKDWW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.55, whereas MKDWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MKDWW's ROE of -3.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is more volatile compared to MKDWW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check MKDWW's competition here
Carbon Revolution Public Limited Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: CREV)
CAAS vs CREV Comparison September 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, CREV has a market cap of 775.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while CREV trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.55, whereas CREV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CREV's ROE of +2.58%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is more volatile compared to CREV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check CREV's competition here
Worksport Ltd. (NASDAQ: WKSPW)
CAAS vs WKSPW Comparison September 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, WKSPW has a market cap of 575.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while WKSPW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.55, whereas WKSPW's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WKSPW's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to WKSPW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check WKSPW's competition here
HYZON Motors Inc (NASDAQ: HYZNW)
CAAS vs HYZNW Comparison September 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, HYZNW has a market cap of 16.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while HYZNW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.55, whereas HYZNW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HYZNW's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to HYZNW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check HYZNW's competition here
Carbon Revolution Public Limited Company Warrant (NASDAQ: CREVW)
CAAS vs CREVW Comparison September 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, CREVW has a market cap of 6.6K. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while CREVW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.55, whereas CREVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CREVW's ROE of +2.58%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is more volatile compared to CREVW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check CREVW's competition here
Accuride Corporation (NYSE: ACW)
CAAS vs ACW Comparison September 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, ACW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while ACW trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.55, whereas ACW's P/E ratio is -9.29. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ACW's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is more volatile compared to ACW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check ACW's competition here
Quantum Fuel Systems Technologies Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: QTWW)
CAAS vs QTWW Comparison September 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, QTWW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while QTWW trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.55, whereas QTWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to QTWW's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to QTWW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check QTWW's competition here
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. (NASDAQ: GTPPP)
CAAS vs GTPPP Comparison September 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, GTPPP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while GTPPP trades at $75.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.55, whereas GTPPP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GTPPP's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to GTPPP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check GTPPP's competition here
Veoneer, Inc. (NYSE: VNE)
CAAS vs VNE Comparison September 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, VNE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while VNE trades at $36.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.55, whereas VNE's P/E ratio is -10.74. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VNE's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is more volatile compared to VNE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check VNE's competition here
Horizon Global Corporation (NYSE: HZN)
CAAS vs HZN Comparison September 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, HZN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while HZN trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.55, whereas HZN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HZN's ROE of +1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is more volatile compared to HZN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check HZN's competition here
Romeo Power, Inc. (NYSE: RMO)
CAAS vs RMO Comparison September 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, RMO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while RMO trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.55, whereas RMO's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RMO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to RMO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check RMO's competition here
Meritor, Inc. (NYSE: MTOR)
CAAS vs MTOR Comparison September 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 152.1M. In comparison, MTOR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $5.04 on the NASDAQ, while MTOR trades at $36.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.55, whereas MTOR's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MTOR's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is more volatile compared to MTOR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check MTOR's competition here