China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See CAAS's competitors and their performance on the NASDAQ and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for CAAS and its NASDAQ peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAAS | $4.39 | +0.92% | 131.8M | 3.08 | $1.42 | N/A |
| APTV-PA | $108.66 | +0.15% | 29.4B | 92.08 | $1.18 | N/A |
| MGA | $69.28 | +5.51% | 18.3B | 10.61 | $6.33 | +2.93% |
| BWA | $63.07 | -2.06% | 13.1B | 12.63 | $5.04 | +1.07% |
| APTV | $58.93 | +4.20% | 12.2B | 7.31 | $7.86 | N/A |
| ALSN | $121.26 | -0.89% | 10.1B | 18.96 | $6.43 | +0.93% |
| ALV | $123.17 | +4.83% | 8.8B | 12.25 | $9.77 | +2.90% |
| LEA | $149.28 | +3.96% | 7.3B | 10.70 | $13.54 | +2.13% |
| LKQ | $26.75 | +3.58% | 6.7B | 8.84 | $2.97 | +4.57% |
| MBLY | $8.43 | +4.72% | 6.5B | 20.02 | $0.40 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
Aptiv PLC (NYSE: APTV-PA)
CAAS vs APTV-PA Comparison July 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 131.8M. In comparison, APTV-PA has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $4.39 on the NASDAQ, while APTV-PA trades at $108.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.08, whereas APTV-PA's P/E ratio is 92.08. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to APTV-PA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is more volatile compared to APTV-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check APTV-PA's competition here
Magna International Inc. (NYSE: MGA)
CAAS vs MGA Comparison July 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 131.8M. In comparison, MGA has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $4.39 on the NASDAQ, while MGA trades at $69.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.08, whereas MGA's P/E ratio is 10.61. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MGA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to MGA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check MGA's competition here
BorgWarner Inc. (NYSE: BWA)
CAAS vs BWA Comparison July 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 131.8M. In comparison, BWA has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $4.39 on the NASDAQ, while BWA trades at $63.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.08, whereas BWA's P/E ratio is 12.63. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BWA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to BWA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check BWA's competition here
Aptiv PLC (NYSE: APTV)
CAAS vs APTV Comparison July 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 131.8M. In comparison, APTV has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $4.39 on the NASDAQ, while APTV trades at $58.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.08, whereas APTV's P/E ratio is 7.31. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to APTV's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is more volatile compared to APTV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check APTV's competition here
Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ALSN)
CAAS vs ALSN Comparison July 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 131.8M. In comparison, ALSN has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $4.39 on the NASDAQ, while ALSN trades at $121.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.08, whereas ALSN's P/E ratio is 18.96. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ALSN's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is more volatile compared to ALSN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check ALSN's competition here
Autoliv, Inc. (NYSE: ALV)
CAAS vs ALV Comparison July 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 131.8M. In comparison, ALV has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $4.39 on the NASDAQ, while ALV trades at $123.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.08, whereas ALV's P/E ratio is 12.25. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ALV's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is more volatile compared to ALV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check ALV's competition here
Lear Corporation (NYSE: LEA)
CAAS vs LEA Comparison July 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 131.8M. In comparison, LEA has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $4.39 on the NASDAQ, while LEA trades at $149.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.08, whereas LEA's P/E ratio is 10.70. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LEA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is more volatile compared to LEA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check LEA's competition here
LKQ Corporation (NASDAQ: LKQ)
CAAS vs LKQ Comparison July 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 131.8M. In comparison, LKQ has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $4.39 on the NASDAQ, while LKQ trades at $26.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.08, whereas LKQ's P/E ratio is 8.84. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LKQ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is more volatile compared to LKQ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check LKQ's competition here
Mobileye Global Inc. (NASDAQ: MBLY)
CAAS vs MBLY Comparison July 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 131.8M. In comparison, MBLY has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $4.39 on the NASDAQ, while MBLY trades at $8.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.08, whereas MBLY's P/E ratio is 20.02. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MBLY's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to MBLY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check MBLY's competition here
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX)
CAAS vs GTX Comparison July 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 131.8M. In comparison, GTX has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $4.39 on the NASDAQ, while GTX trades at $29.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.08, whereas GTX's P/E ratio is 18.01. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GTX's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to GTX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check GTX's competition here
Gentex Corporation (NASDAQ: GNTX)
CAAS vs GNTX Comparison July 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 131.8M. In comparison, GNTX has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $4.39 on the NASDAQ, while GNTX trades at $23.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.08, whereas GNTX's P/E ratio is 12.46. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GNTX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is more volatile compared to GNTX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check GNTX's competition here
Brunswick Corporation 6.500% Se (NYSE: BC-PA)
CAAS vs BC-PA Comparison July 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 131.8M. In comparison, BC-PA has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $4.39 on the NASDAQ, while BC-PA trades at $74.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.08, whereas BC-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BC-PA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is more volatile compared to BC-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check BC-PA's competition here
Dorman Products, Inc. (NASDAQ: DORM)
CAAS vs DORM Comparison July 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 131.8M. In comparison, DORM has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $4.39 on the NASDAQ, while DORM trades at $141.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.08, whereas DORM's P/E ratio is 16.20. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DORM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is more volatile compared to DORM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check DORM's competition here
Brunswick Corporation 6.625% Se (NYSE: BC-PB)
CAAS vs BC-PB Comparison July 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 131.8M. In comparison, BC-PB has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $4.39 on the NASDAQ, while BC-PB trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.08, whereas BC-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BC-PB's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is more volatile compared to BC-PB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check BC-PB's competition here
Dana Incorporated (NYSE: DAN)
CAAS vs DAN Comparison July 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 131.8M. In comparison, DAN has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $4.39 on the NASDAQ, while DAN trades at $27.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.08, whereas DAN's P/E ratio is 31.84. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DAN's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is more volatile compared to DAN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check DAN's competition here
QuantumScape Corporation (NASDAQ: QS)
CAAS vs QS Comparison July 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 131.8M. In comparison, QS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $4.39 on the NASDAQ, while QS trades at $5.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.08, whereas QS's P/E ratio is -7.30. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to QS's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to QS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check QS's competition here
Boyd Group Services Inc. (NYSE: BGSI)
CAAS vs BGSI Comparison July 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 131.8M. In comparison, BGSI has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $4.39 on the NASDAQ, while BGSI trades at $114.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.08, whereas BGSI's P/E ratio is 51.32. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BGSI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to BGSI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check BGSI's competition here
PHINIA Inc. (NYSE: PHIN)
CAAS vs PHIN Comparison July 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 131.8M. In comparison, PHIN has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $4.39 on the NASDAQ, while PHIN trades at $80.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.08, whereas PHIN's P/E ratio is 14.73. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PHIN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is more volatile compared to PHIN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check PHIN's competition here
Visteon Corporation (NASDAQ: VC)
CAAS vs VC Comparison July 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 131.8M. In comparison, VC has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $4.39 on the NASDAQ, while VC trades at $107.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.08, whereas VC's P/E ratio is 11.53. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to VC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check VC's competition here
Hesai Group (NASDAQ: HSAI)
CAAS vs HSAI Comparison July 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 131.8M. In comparison, HSAI has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $4.39 on the NASDAQ, while HSAI trades at $16.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.08, whereas HSAI's P/E ratio is 35.07. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HSAI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to HSAI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check HSAI's competition here
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (NASDAQ: GT)
CAAS vs GT Comparison July 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 131.8M. In comparison, GT has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $4.39 on the NASDAQ, while GT trades at $7.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.08, whereas GT's P/E ratio is 64.64. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GT's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to GT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check GT's competition here
Adient plc (NYSE: ADNT)
CAAS vs ADNT Comparison July 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 131.8M. In comparison, ADNT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $4.39 on the NASDAQ, while ADNT trades at $21.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.08, whereas ADNT's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ADNT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to ADNT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check ADNT's competition here
Gentherm Incorporated (NASDAQ: THRM)
CAAS vs THRM Comparison July 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 131.8M. In comparison, THRM has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $4.39 on the NASDAQ, while THRM trades at $41.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.08, whereas THRM's P/E ratio is 16.18. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to THRM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is more volatile compared to THRM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check THRM's competition here
XPEL, Inc. (NASDAQ: XPEL)
CAAS vs XPEL Comparison July 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 131.8M. In comparison, XPEL has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $4.39 on the NASDAQ, while XPEL trades at $43.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.08, whereas XPEL's P/E ratio is 22.50. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to XPEL's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is more volatile compared to XPEL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check XPEL's competition here
American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: AXL)
CAAS vs AXL Comparison July 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 131.8M. In comparison, AXL has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $4.39 on the NASDAQ, while AXL trades at $8.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.08, whereas AXL's P/E ratio is 23.30. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AXL's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to AXL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check AXL's competition here
Standard Motor Products, Inc. (NYSE: SMP)
CAAS vs SMP Comparison July 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 131.8M. In comparison, SMP has a market cap of 867.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $4.39 on the NASDAQ, while SMP trades at $40.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.08, whereas SMP's P/E ratio is 9.67. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SMP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is more volatile compared to SMP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check SMP's competition here
Fox Factory Holding Corp. (NASDAQ: FOXF)
CAAS vs FOXF Comparison July 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 131.8M. In comparison, FOXF has a market cap of 778.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $4.39 on the NASDAQ, while FOXF trades at $19.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.08, whereas FOXF's P/E ratio is 18.39. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FOXF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to FOXF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check FOXF's competition here
Hyliion Holdings Corp. (AMEX: HYLN)
CAAS vs HYLN Comparison July 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 131.8M. In comparison, HYLN has a market cap of 680.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $4.39 on the NASDAQ, while HYLN trades at $3.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.08, whereas HYLN's P/E ratio is -12.72. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HYLN's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to HYLN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check HYLN's competition here
Dauch Corp. (NYSE: DCH)
CAAS vs DCH Comparison July 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 131.8M. In comparison, DCH has a market cap of 660.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $4.39 on the NASDAQ, while DCH trades at $5.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.08, whereas DCH's P/E ratio is 7.15. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DCH's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is more volatile compared to DCH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check DCH's competition here
Miller Industries, Inc. (NYSE: MLR)
CAAS vs MLR Comparison July 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 131.8M. In comparison, MLR has a market cap of 584.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $4.39 on the NASDAQ, while MLR trades at $51.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.08, whereas MLR's P/E ratio is 38.31. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MLR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is more volatile compared to MLR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check MLR's competition here
Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTXAP)
CAAS vs GTXAP Comparison July 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 131.8M. In comparison, GTXAP has a market cap of 557.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $4.39 on the NASDAQ, while GTXAP trades at $8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.08, whereas GTXAP's P/E ratio is 4.44. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GTXAP's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is more volatile compared to GTXAP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check GTXAP's competition here
Monro Inc. (NASDAQ: MNRO)
CAAS vs MNRO Comparison July 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 131.8M. In comparison, MNRO has a market cap of 529.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $4.39 on the NASDAQ, while MNRO trades at $17.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.08, whereas MNRO's P/E ratio is 39.40. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MNRO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is more volatile compared to MNRO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check MNRO's competition here
Cooper-Standard Holdings Inc. (NYSE: CPS)
CAAS vs CPS Comparison July 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 131.8M. In comparison, CPS has a market cap of 507.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $4.39 on the NASDAQ, while CPS trades at $29.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.08, whereas CPS's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CPS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is more volatile compared to CPS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check CPS's competition here
Allego N.V. (NYSE: ALLG)
CAAS vs ALLG Comparison July 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 131.8M. In comparison, ALLG has a market cap of 496.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $4.39 on the NASDAQ, while ALLG trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.08, whereas ALLG's P/E ratio is -3.96. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ALLG's ROE of +4.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to ALLG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check ALLG's competition here
Solid Power, Inc. (NASDAQ: SLDP)
CAAS vs SLDP Comparison July 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 131.8M. In comparison, SLDP has a market cap of 481.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $4.39 on the NASDAQ, while SLDP trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.08, whereas SLDP's P/E ratio is -4.46. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SLDP's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to SLDP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check SLDP's competition here
ECARX Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: ECX)
CAAS vs ECX Comparison July 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 131.8M. In comparison, ECX has a market cap of 374.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $4.39 on the NASDAQ, while ECX trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.08, whereas ECX's P/E ratio is -3.72. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ECX's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to ECX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check ECX's competition here
Strattec Security Corporation (NASDAQ: STRT)
CAAS vs STRT Comparison July 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 131.8M. In comparison, STRT has a market cap of 365.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $4.39 on the NASDAQ, while STRT trades at $89.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.08, whereas STRT's P/E ratio is 12.71. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to STRT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is more volatile compared to STRT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check STRT's competition here
ECARX Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: ECXWW)
CAAS vs ECXWW Comparison July 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 131.8M. In comparison, ECXWW has a market cap of 347M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $4.39 on the NASDAQ, while ECXWW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.08, whereas ECXWW's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ECXWW's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to ECXWW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check ECXWW's competition here
Holley Inc. WT (NYSE: HLLY-WT)
CAAS vs HLLY-WT Comparison July 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 131.8M. In comparison, HLLY-WT has a market cap of 344.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $4.39 on the NASDAQ, while HLLY-WT trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.08, whereas HLLY-WT's P/E ratio is 0.16. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HLLY-WT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to HLLY-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check HLLY-WT's competition here
Holley Inc. (NYSE: HLLY)
CAAS vs HLLY Comparison July 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 131.8M. In comparison, HLLY has a market cap of 320.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $4.39 on the NASDAQ, while HLLY trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.08, whereas HLLY's P/E ratio is 12.67. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HLLY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to HLLY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check HLLY's competition here
Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. (NASDAQ: MPAA)
CAAS vs MPAA Comparison July 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 131.8M. In comparison, MPAA has a market cap of 263.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $4.39 on the NASDAQ, while MPAA trades at $14.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.08, whereas MPAA's P/E ratio is 14.66. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MPAA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is more volatile compared to MPAA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check MPAA's competition here
Aeva Technologies, Inc. Redeema (NYSE: AEVA-WT)
CAAS vs AEVA-WT Comparison July 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 131.8M. In comparison, AEVA-WT has a market cap of 227.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $4.39 on the NASDAQ, while AEVA-WT trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.08, whereas AEVA-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AEVA-WT's ROE of +6.92%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is more volatile compared to AEVA-WT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check AEVA-WT's competition here
Stoneridge, Inc. (NYSE: SRI)
CAAS vs SRI Comparison July 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 131.8M. In comparison, SRI has a market cap of 210.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $4.39 on the NASDAQ, while SRI trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.08, whereas SRI's P/E ratio is -4.36. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SRI's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is more volatile compared to SRI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check SRI's competition here
SES AI Corporation (NYSE: SES)
CAAS vs SES Comparison July 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 131.8M. In comparison, SES has a market cap of 202M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $4.39 on the NASDAQ, while SES trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.08, whereas SES's P/E ratio is -2.77. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SES's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to SES. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check SES's competition here
Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: CVGI)
CAAS vs CVGI Comparison July 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 131.8M. In comparison, CVGI has a market cap of 177.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $4.39 on the NASDAQ, while CVGI trades at $4.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.08, whereas CVGI's P/E ratio is -8.90. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CVGI's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to CVGI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check CVGI's competition here
XL Fleet Corp. (NYSE: XL)
CAAS vs XL Comparison July 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 131.8M. In comparison, XL has a market cap of 164.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $4.39 on the NASDAQ, while XL trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.08, whereas XL's P/E ratio is -3.21. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to XL's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to XL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check XL's competition here
Innoviz Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: INVZ)
CAAS vs INVZ Comparison July 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 131.8M. In comparison, INVZ has a market cap of 139.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $4.39 on the NASDAQ, while INVZ trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.08, whereas INVZ's P/E ratio is -1.91. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to INVZ's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to INVZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check INVZ's competition here
Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: KNDI)
CAAS vs KNDI Comparison July 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 131.8M. In comparison, KNDI has a market cap of 54.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $4.39 on the NASDAQ, while KNDI trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.08, whereas KNDI's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KNDI's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to KNDI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check KNDI's competition here
Gogoro Inc. (NASDAQ: GGROW)
CAAS vs GGROW Comparison July 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 131.8M. In comparison, GGROW has a market cap of 52.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $4.39 on the NASDAQ, while GGROW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.08, whereas GGROW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GGROW's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to GGROW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check GGROW's competition here
AEye, Inc. (NASDAQ: LIDRW)
CAAS vs LIDRW Comparison July 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 131.8M. In comparison, LIDRW has a market cap of 52.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $4.39 on the NASDAQ, while LIDRW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.08, whereas LIDRW's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LIDRW's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to LIDRW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check LIDRW's competition here
MKDWELL Tech Inc. (NASDAQ: MKDW)
CAAS vs MKDW Comparison July 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 131.8M. In comparison, MKDW has a market cap of 48.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $4.39 on the NASDAQ, while MKDW trades at $11.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.08, whereas MKDW's P/E ratio is -17.77. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MKDW's ROE of -3.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to MKDW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check MKDW's competition here
Westport Fuel Systems Inc. (NASDAQ: WPRT)
CAAS vs WPRT Comparison July 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 131.8M. In comparison, WPRT has a market cap of 33.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $4.39 on the NASDAQ, while WPRT trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.08, whereas WPRT's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WPRT's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is more volatile compared to WPRT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check WPRT's competition here
noco-noco Inc. (NASDAQ: NCNC)
CAAS vs NCNC Comparison July 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 131.8M. In comparison, NCNC has a market cap of 20.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $4.39 on the NASDAQ, while NCNC trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.08, whereas NCNC's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NCNC's ROE of +3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is more volatile compared to NCNC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check NCNC's competition here
noco-noco Inc. (NASDAQ: NCNCW)
CAAS vs NCNCW Comparison July 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 131.8M. In comparison, NCNCW has a market cap of 20.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $4.39 on the NASDAQ, while NCNCW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.08, whereas NCNCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NCNCW's ROE of +3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is more volatile compared to NCNCW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check NCNCW's competition here
Atlis Motor Vehicles, Inc. (NASDAQ: AMV)
CAAS vs AMV Comparison July 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 131.8M. In comparison, AMV has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $4.39 on the NASDAQ, while AMV trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.08, whereas AMV's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AMV's ROE of +15.75%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to AMV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check AMV's competition here
SAG Holdings Ltd (NASDAQ: SAG)
CAAS vs SAG Comparison July 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 131.8M. In comparison, SAG has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $4.39 on the NASDAQ, while SAG trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.08, whereas SAG's P/E ratio is 6.73. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SAG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to SAG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check SAG's competition here
Superior Industries International, Inc. (NYSE: SUP)
CAAS vs SUP Comparison July 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 131.8M. In comparison, SUP has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $4.39 on the NASDAQ, while SUP trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.08, whereas SUP's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SUP's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to SUP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check SUP's competition here
INNEOVA Holdings Ltd (NASDAQ: INEO)
CAAS vs INEO Comparison July 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 131.8M. In comparison, INEO has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $4.39 on the NASDAQ, while INEO trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.08, whereas INEO's P/E ratio is -17.53. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to INEO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to INEO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check INEO's competition here
Foresight Autonomous Holdings Ltd. (NASDAQ: FRSX)
CAAS vs FRSX Comparison July 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 131.8M. In comparison, FRSX has a market cap of 5.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $4.39 on the NASDAQ, while FRSX trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.08, whereas FRSX's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FRSX's ROE of -1.89%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to FRSX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check FRSX's competition here
Worksport Ltd. (NASDAQ: WKSP)
CAAS vs WKSP Comparison July 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 131.8M. In comparison, WKSP has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $4.39 on the NASDAQ, while WKSP trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.08, whereas WKSP's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WKSP's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to WKSP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check WKSP's competition here
REE Automotive Ltd. (NASDAQ: REE)
CAAS vs REE Comparison July 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 131.8M. In comparison, REE has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $4.39 on the NASDAQ, while REE trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.08, whereas REE's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to REE's ROE of -2.61%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to REE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check REE's competition here
Unique Fabricating, Inc. (AMEX: UFAB)
CAAS vs UFAB Comparison July 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 131.8M. In comparison, UFAB has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $4.39 on the NASDAQ, while UFAB trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.08, whereas UFAB's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UFAB's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to UFAB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check UFAB's competition here
MKDWELL Tech Inc. (NASDAQ: MKDWW)
CAAS vs MKDWW Comparison July 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 131.8M. In comparison, MKDWW has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $4.39 on the NASDAQ, while MKDWW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.08, whereas MKDWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MKDWW's ROE of -3.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to MKDWW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check MKDWW's competition here
Innoviz Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: INVZW)
CAAS vs INVZW Comparison July 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 131.8M. In comparison, INVZW has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $4.39 on the NASDAQ, while INVZW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.08, whereas INVZW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to INVZW's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is more volatile compared to INVZW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check INVZW's competition here
Carbon Revolution Public Limited Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: CREV)
CAAS vs CREV Comparison July 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 131.8M. In comparison, CREV has a market cap of 775.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $4.39 on the NASDAQ, while CREV trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.08, whereas CREV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CREV's ROE of +2.58%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is more volatile compared to CREV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check CREV's competition here
Tema Photonics & Optical ETF (AMEX: LAZR)
CAAS vs LAZR Comparison July 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 131.8M. In comparison, LAZR has a market cap of 759K. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $4.39 on the NASDAQ, while LAZR trades at $34.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.08, whereas LAZR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LAZR's ROE of +1.84%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to LAZR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check LAZR's competition here
Worksport Ltd. (NASDAQ: WKSPW)
CAAS vs WKSPW Comparison July 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 131.8M. In comparison, WKSPW has a market cap of 575.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $4.39 on the NASDAQ, while WKSPW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.08, whereas WKSPW's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WKSPW's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to WKSPW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check WKSPW's competition here
HYZON Motors Inc (NASDAQ: HYZNW)
CAAS vs HYZNW Comparison July 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 131.8M. In comparison, HYZNW has a market cap of 16.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $4.39 on the NASDAQ, while HYZNW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.08, whereas HYZNW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HYZNW's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to HYZNW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check HYZNW's competition here
Carbon Revolution Public Limited Company Warrant (NASDAQ: CREVW)
CAAS vs CREVW Comparison July 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 131.8M. In comparison, CREVW has a market cap of 6.6K. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $4.39 on the NASDAQ, while CREVW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.08, whereas CREVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CREVW's ROE of +2.58%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is more volatile compared to CREVW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check CREVW's competition here
Accuride Corporation (NYSE: ACW)
CAAS vs ACW Comparison July 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 131.8M. In comparison, ACW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $4.39 on the NASDAQ, while ACW trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.08, whereas ACW's P/E ratio is -9.29. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ACW's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is more volatile compared to ACW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check ACW's competition here
Veoneer, Inc. (NYSE: VNE)
CAAS vs VNE Comparison July 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 131.8M. In comparison, VNE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $4.39 on the NASDAQ, while VNE trades at $36.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.08, whereas VNE's P/E ratio is -10.74. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VNE's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is more volatile compared to VNE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check VNE's competition here
Romeo Power, Inc. (NYSE: RMO)
CAAS vs RMO Comparison July 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 131.8M. In comparison, RMO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $4.39 on the NASDAQ, while RMO trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.08, whereas RMO's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RMO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to RMO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check RMO's competition here
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. (NASDAQ: GTPPP)
CAAS vs GTPPP Comparison July 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 131.8M. In comparison, GTPPP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $4.39 on the NASDAQ, while GTPPP trades at $75.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.08, whereas GTPPP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GTPPP's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to GTPPP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check GTPPP's competition here
Horizon Global Corporation (NYSE: HZN)
CAAS vs HZN Comparison July 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 131.8M. In comparison, HZN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $4.39 on the NASDAQ, while HZN trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.08, whereas HZN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HZN's ROE of +1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is more volatile compared to HZN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check HZN's competition here
Quantum Fuel Systems Technologies Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: QTWW)
CAAS vs QTWW Comparison July 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 131.8M. In comparison, QTWW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $4.39 on the NASDAQ, while QTWW trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.08, whereas QTWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to QTWW's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is less volatile compared to QTWW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check QTWW's competition here
Meritor, Inc. (NYSE: MTOR)
CAAS vs MTOR Comparison July 2026
China Automotive Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAAS) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CAAS stands at 131.8M. In comparison, MTOR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CAAS is priced at $4.39 on the NASDAQ, while MTOR trades at $36.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CAAS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.08, whereas MTOR's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, CAAS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MTOR's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CAAS is more volatile compared to MTOR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CAAS.Check MTOR's competition here