Xilam Animation
Xilam Animation (XIL.PA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (XIL.PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Entertainment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XIL.PA | €3.00 | +0.00% | 17.4M | -0.69 | -€4.37 | N/A |
| UMG.AS | €20.58 | +0.68% | 37.7B | 24.80 | €0.83 | +2.50% |
| BOL.PA | €5.47 | +1.77% | 15.3B | 45.54 | €0.12 | +1.48% |
| FLE.AS | €9.45 | +0.53% | 4B | 55.59 | €0.17 | N/A |
| VIV.PA | €2.32 | -1.11% | 2.3B | 116.20 | €0.02 | +1.69% |
| KIN.BR | €29.70 | +1.37% | 794.4M | 20.92 | €1.42 | +1.53% |
| GAM.PA | €108.00 | +0.00% | 336.4M | -17.28 | -€6.25 | N/A |
| SCP.LS | €0.99 | +0.00% | 200M | 5.50 | €0.18 | N/A |
| SLBEN.LS | €7.30 | +0.27% | 167.9M | 4.80 | €1.52 | N/A |
| MCP.LS | €1.90 | +0.00% | 160.6M | 13.57 | €0.14 | +6.58% |
Stock Comparison
XIL.PA vs UMG.AS Comparison May 2026
XIL.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIL.PA stands at 17.4M. In comparison, UMG.AS has a market cap of 37.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XIL.PA is priced at €3.00, while UMG.AS trades at €20.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIL.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas UMG.AS's P/E ratio is 24.80. In terms of profitability, XIL.PA's ROE is -0.58%, compared to UMG.AS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, XIL.PA is more volatile compared to UMG.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIL.PA.Check UMG.AS's competition here
XIL.PA vs BOL.PA Comparison May 2026
XIL.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIL.PA stands at 17.4M. In comparison, BOL.PA has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XIL.PA is priced at €3.00, while BOL.PA trades at €5.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIL.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas BOL.PA's P/E ratio is 45.54. In terms of profitability, XIL.PA's ROE is -0.58%, compared to BOL.PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, XIL.PA is more volatile compared to BOL.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIL.PA.Check BOL.PA's competition here
XIL.PA vs FLE.AS Comparison May 2026
XIL.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIL.PA stands at 17.4M. In comparison, FLE.AS has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, XIL.PA is priced at €3.00, while FLE.AS trades at €9.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIL.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas FLE.AS's P/E ratio is 55.59. In terms of profitability, XIL.PA's ROE is -0.58%, compared to FLE.AS's ROE of +2.72%. Regarding short-term risk, XIL.PA is more volatile compared to FLE.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIL.PA.Check FLE.AS's competition here
XIL.PA vs VIV.PA Comparison May 2026
XIL.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIL.PA stands at 17.4M. In comparison, VIV.PA has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XIL.PA is priced at €3.00, while VIV.PA trades at €2.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIL.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas VIV.PA's P/E ratio is 116.20. In terms of profitability, XIL.PA's ROE is -0.58%, compared to VIV.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XIL.PA is more volatile compared to VIV.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIL.PA.Check VIV.PA's competition here
XIL.PA vs KIN.BR Comparison May 2026
XIL.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIL.PA stands at 17.4M. In comparison, KIN.BR has a market cap of 794.4M. Regarding current trading prices, XIL.PA is priced at €3.00, while KIN.BR trades at €29.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIL.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas KIN.BR's P/E ratio is 20.92. In terms of profitability, XIL.PA's ROE is -0.58%, compared to KIN.BR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, XIL.PA is more volatile compared to KIN.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIL.PA.Check KIN.BR's competition here
XIL.PA vs GAM.PA Comparison May 2026
XIL.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIL.PA stands at 17.4M. In comparison, GAM.PA has a market cap of 336.4M. Regarding current trading prices, XIL.PA is priced at €3.00, while GAM.PA trades at €108.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIL.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas GAM.PA's P/E ratio is -17.28. In terms of profitability, XIL.PA's ROE is -0.58%, compared to GAM.PA's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, XIL.PA is more volatile compared to GAM.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIL.PA.Check GAM.PA's competition here
XIL.PA vs SCP.LS Comparison May 2026
XIL.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIL.PA stands at 17.4M. In comparison, SCP.LS has a market cap of 200M. Regarding current trading prices, XIL.PA is priced at €3.00, while SCP.LS trades at €0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIL.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas SCP.LS's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, XIL.PA's ROE is -0.58%, compared to SCP.LS's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, XIL.PA is more volatile compared to SCP.LS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIL.PA.Check SCP.LS's competition here
XIL.PA vs SLBEN.LS Comparison May 2026
XIL.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIL.PA stands at 17.4M. In comparison, SLBEN.LS has a market cap of 167.9M. Regarding current trading prices, XIL.PA is priced at €3.00, while SLBEN.LS trades at €7.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIL.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas SLBEN.LS's P/E ratio is 4.80. In terms of profitability, XIL.PA's ROE is -0.58%, compared to SLBEN.LS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, XIL.PA is less volatile compared to SLBEN.LS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIL.PA.Check SLBEN.LS's competition here
XIL.PA vs MCP.LS Comparison May 2026
XIL.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIL.PA stands at 17.4M. In comparison, MCP.LS has a market cap of 160.6M. Regarding current trading prices, XIL.PA is priced at €3.00, while MCP.LS trades at €1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIL.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas MCP.LS's P/E ratio is 13.57. In terms of profitability, XIL.PA's ROE is -0.58%, compared to MCP.LS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, XIL.PA is more volatile compared to MCP.LS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIL.PA.Check MCP.LS's competition here
XIL.PA vs AJAX.AS Comparison May 2026
XIL.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIL.PA stands at 17.4M. In comparison, AJAX.AS has a market cap of 156.9M. Regarding current trading prices, XIL.PA is priced at €3.00, while AJAX.AS trades at €8.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIL.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas AJAX.AS's P/E ratio is -4.20. In terms of profitability, XIL.PA's ROE is -0.58%, compared to AJAX.AS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, XIL.PA is less volatile compared to AJAX.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIL.PA.Check AJAX.AS's competition here
XIL.PA vs DEEZR.PA Comparison May 2026
XIL.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIL.PA stands at 17.4M. In comparison, DEEZR.PA has a market cap of 139.4M. Regarding current trading prices, XIL.PA is priced at €3.00, while DEEZR.PA trades at €1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIL.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas DEEZR.PA's P/E ratio is 22.50. In terms of profitability, XIL.PA's ROE is -0.58%, compared to DEEZR.PA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, XIL.PA is more volatile compared to DEEZR.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIL.PA.Check DEEZR.PA's competition here
XIL.PA vs FCP.LS Comparison May 2026
XIL.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIL.PA stands at 17.4M. In comparison, FCP.LS has a market cap of 74.2M. Regarding current trading prices, XIL.PA is priced at €3.00, while FCP.LS trades at €3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIL.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas FCP.LS's P/E ratio is -3.47. In terms of profitability, XIL.PA's ROE is -0.58%, compared to FCP.LS's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, XIL.PA is more volatile compared to FCP.LS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIL.PA.Check FCP.LS's competition here
XIL.PA vs ALECP.PA Comparison May 2026
XIL.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIL.PA stands at 17.4M. In comparison, ALECP.PA has a market cap of 45.1M. Regarding current trading prices, XIL.PA is priced at €3.00, while ALECP.PA trades at €0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIL.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas ALECP.PA's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, XIL.PA's ROE is -0.58%, compared to ALECP.PA's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, XIL.PA is more volatile compared to ALECP.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIL.PA.Check ALECP.PA's competition here
XIL.PA vs TCHCS.PA Comparison May 2026
XIL.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIL.PA stands at 17.4M. In comparison, TCHCS.PA has a market cap of 41.6M. Regarding current trading prices, XIL.PA is priced at €3.00, while TCHCS.PA trades at €1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIL.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas TCHCS.PA's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, XIL.PA's ROE is -0.58%, compared to TCHCS.PA's ROE of +3.25%. Regarding short-term risk, XIL.PA is more volatile compared to TCHCS.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIL.PA.Check TCHCS.PA's competition here
XIL.PA vs SCB.LS Comparison May 2026
XIL.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIL.PA stands at 17.4M. In comparison, SCB.LS has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, XIL.PA is priced at €3.00, while SCB.LS trades at €15.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIL.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas SCB.LS's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, XIL.PA's ROE is -0.58%, compared to SCB.LS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, XIL.PA is more volatile compared to SCB.LS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIL.PA.Check SCB.LS's competition here
XIL.PA vs TCH.PA Comparison May 2026
XIL.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIL.PA stands at 17.4M. In comparison, TCH.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, XIL.PA is priced at €3.00, while TCH.PA trades at €2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIL.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas TCH.PA's P/E ratio is -5.90. In terms of profitability, XIL.PA's ROE is -0.58%, compared to TCH.PA's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, XIL.PA is less volatile compared to TCH.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIL.PA.Check TCH.PA's competition here
XIL.PA vs ECP.PA Comparison May 2026
XIL.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIL.PA stands at 17.4M. In comparison, ECP.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, XIL.PA is priced at €3.00, while ECP.PA trades at €0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIL.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas ECP.PA's P/E ratio is 0.53. In terms of profitability, XIL.PA's ROE is -0.58%, compared to ECP.PA's ROE of -21.48%. Regarding short-term risk, XIL.PA is less volatile compared to ECP.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIL.PA.Check ECP.PA's competition here