Universal Music Group N.V.
Universal Music Group N.V. (UMG.AS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (UMG.AS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Entertainment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UMG.AS | €20.34 | -0.49% | 37.7B | 24.80 | €0.83 | +2.53% |
| BOL.PA | €5.43 | +1.02% | 15.3B | 45.54 | €0.12 | +1.46% |
| FLE.AS | €9.45 | +0.53% | 4B | 55.59 | €0.17 | N/A |
| VIV.PA | €2.31 | -1.45% | 2.3B | 116.20 | €0.02 | +1.72% |
| KIN.BR | €29.65 | +1.19% | 794.4M | 20.92 | €1.42 | +1.53% |
| GAM.PA | €104.00 | -3.70% | 336.4M | -17.28 | -€6.25 | N/A |
| SCP.LS | €1.00 | +1.01% | 200M | 5.50 | €0.18 | N/A |
| SLBEN.LS | €7.28 | +0.00% | 167.9M | 4.80 | €1.52 | N/A |
| MCP.LS | €1.90 | +0.00% | 160.6M | 13.57 | €0.14 | +6.58% |
| AJAX.AS | €8.46 | -1.40% | 156.9M | -4.20 | -€2.04 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
UMG.AS vs BOL.PA Comparison May 2026
UMG.AS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMG.AS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, BOL.PA has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UMG.AS is priced at €20.34, while BOL.PA trades at €5.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.80, whereas BOL.PA's P/E ratio is 45.54. In terms of profitability, UMG.AS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to BOL.PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UMG.AS is more volatile compared to BOL.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMG.AS.Check BOL.PA's competition here
UMG.AS vs FLE.AS Comparison May 2026
UMG.AS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMG.AS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, FLE.AS has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, UMG.AS is priced at €20.34, while FLE.AS trades at €9.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.80, whereas FLE.AS's P/E ratio is 55.59. In terms of profitability, UMG.AS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to FLE.AS's ROE of +2.72%. Regarding short-term risk, UMG.AS is more volatile compared to FLE.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMG.AS.Check FLE.AS's competition here
UMG.AS vs VIV.PA Comparison May 2026
UMG.AS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMG.AS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, VIV.PA has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UMG.AS is priced at €20.34, while VIV.PA trades at €2.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.80, whereas VIV.PA's P/E ratio is 116.20. In terms of profitability, UMG.AS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to VIV.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMG.AS is less volatile compared to VIV.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMG.AS.Check VIV.PA's competition here
UMG.AS vs KIN.BR Comparison May 2026
UMG.AS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMG.AS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, KIN.BR has a market cap of 794.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UMG.AS is priced at €20.34, while KIN.BR trades at €29.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.80, whereas KIN.BR's P/E ratio is 20.92. In terms of profitability, UMG.AS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to KIN.BR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UMG.AS is less volatile compared to KIN.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMG.AS.Check KIN.BR's competition here
UMG.AS vs GAM.PA Comparison May 2026
UMG.AS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMG.AS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, GAM.PA has a market cap of 336.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UMG.AS is priced at €20.34, while GAM.PA trades at €104.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.80, whereas GAM.PA's P/E ratio is -17.28. In terms of profitability, UMG.AS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to GAM.PA's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UMG.AS is less volatile compared to GAM.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMG.AS.Check GAM.PA's competition here
UMG.AS vs SCP.LS Comparison May 2026
UMG.AS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMG.AS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, SCP.LS has a market cap of 200M. Regarding current trading prices, UMG.AS is priced at €20.34, while SCP.LS trades at €1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.80, whereas SCP.LS's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, UMG.AS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to SCP.LS's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, UMG.AS is more volatile compared to SCP.LS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMG.AS.Check SCP.LS's competition here
UMG.AS vs SLBEN.LS Comparison May 2026
UMG.AS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMG.AS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, SLBEN.LS has a market cap of 167.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UMG.AS is priced at €20.34, while SLBEN.LS trades at €7.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.80, whereas SLBEN.LS's P/E ratio is 4.80. In terms of profitability, UMG.AS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to SLBEN.LS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, UMG.AS is less volatile compared to SLBEN.LS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMG.AS.Check SLBEN.LS's competition here
UMG.AS vs MCP.LS Comparison May 2026
UMG.AS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMG.AS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, MCP.LS has a market cap of 160.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UMG.AS is priced at €20.34, while MCP.LS trades at €1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.80, whereas MCP.LS's P/E ratio is 13.57. In terms of profitability, UMG.AS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to MCP.LS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UMG.AS is more volatile compared to MCP.LS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMG.AS.Check MCP.LS's competition here
UMG.AS vs AJAX.AS Comparison May 2026
UMG.AS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMG.AS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, AJAX.AS has a market cap of 156.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UMG.AS is priced at €20.34, while AJAX.AS trades at €8.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.80, whereas AJAX.AS's P/E ratio is -4.20. In terms of profitability, UMG.AS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to AJAX.AS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UMG.AS is less volatile compared to AJAX.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMG.AS.Check AJAX.AS's competition here
UMG.AS vs DEEZR.PA Comparison May 2026
UMG.AS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMG.AS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, DEEZR.PA has a market cap of 139.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UMG.AS is priced at €20.34, while DEEZR.PA trades at €1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.80, whereas DEEZR.PA's P/E ratio is 22.50. In terms of profitability, UMG.AS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to DEEZR.PA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UMG.AS is more volatile compared to DEEZR.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMG.AS.Check DEEZR.PA's competition here
UMG.AS vs FCP.LS Comparison May 2026
UMG.AS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMG.AS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, FCP.LS has a market cap of 74.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UMG.AS is priced at €20.34, while FCP.LS trades at €3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.80, whereas FCP.LS's P/E ratio is -3.47. In terms of profitability, UMG.AS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to FCP.LS's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, UMG.AS is more volatile compared to FCP.LS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMG.AS.Check FCP.LS's competition here
UMG.AS vs ALECP.PA Comparison May 2026
UMG.AS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMG.AS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, ALECP.PA has a market cap of 45.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UMG.AS is priced at €20.34, while ALECP.PA trades at €0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.80, whereas ALECP.PA's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, UMG.AS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ALECP.PA's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, UMG.AS is more volatile compared to ALECP.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMG.AS.Check ALECP.PA's competition here
UMG.AS vs TCHCS.PA Comparison May 2026
UMG.AS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMG.AS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, TCHCS.PA has a market cap of 41.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UMG.AS is priced at €20.34, while TCHCS.PA trades at €1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.80, whereas TCHCS.PA's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, UMG.AS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to TCHCS.PA's ROE of +3.25%. Regarding short-term risk, UMG.AS is more volatile compared to TCHCS.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMG.AS.Check TCHCS.PA's competition here
UMG.AS vs SCB.LS Comparison May 2026
UMG.AS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMG.AS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, SCB.LS has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UMG.AS is priced at €20.34, while SCB.LS trades at €15.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.80, whereas SCB.LS's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, UMG.AS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to SCB.LS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, UMG.AS is more volatile compared to SCB.LS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMG.AS.Check SCB.LS's competition here
UMG.AS vs XIL.PA Comparison May 2026
UMG.AS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMG.AS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, XIL.PA has a market cap of 17.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UMG.AS is priced at €20.34, while XIL.PA trades at €3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.80, whereas XIL.PA's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, UMG.AS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to XIL.PA's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, UMG.AS is less volatile compared to XIL.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMG.AS.Check XIL.PA's competition here
UMG.AS vs ECP.PA Comparison May 2026
UMG.AS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMG.AS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, ECP.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UMG.AS is priced at €20.34, while ECP.PA trades at €0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.80, whereas ECP.PA's P/E ratio is 0.53. In terms of profitability, UMG.AS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ECP.PA's ROE of -21.48%. Regarding short-term risk, UMG.AS is less volatile compared to ECP.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMG.AS.Check ECP.PA's competition here
UMG.AS vs TCH.PA Comparison May 2026
UMG.AS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMG.AS stands at 37.7B. In comparison, TCH.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UMG.AS is priced at €20.34, while TCH.PA trades at €2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMG.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.80, whereas TCH.PA's P/E ratio is -5.90. In terms of profitability, UMG.AS's ROE is +0.33%, compared to TCH.PA's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, UMG.AS is less volatile compared to TCH.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMG.AS.Check TCH.PA's competition here