Sporting Clube de Braga - Futebol, SAD
Sporting Clube de Braga - Futebol, SAD (SCB.LS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SCB.LS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Entertainment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCB.LS | €15.30 | +0.00% | 18.4M | -1.67 | -€9.16 | N/A |
| UMG.AS | €20.60 | +0.73% | 37.5B | 24.63 | €0.83 | +2.50% |
| BOL.PA | €5.46 | +1.96% | 15B | 44.79 | €0.12 | +1.48% |
| FLE.AS | €9.45 | +0.53% | 4B | 55.59 | €0.17 | N/A |
| VIV.PA | €2.35 | +1.99% | 2.3B | 117.30 | €0.02 | +1.69% |
| KIN.BR | €29.75 | -0.34% | 783.7M | 20.63 | €1.42 | +1.53% |
| GAM.PA | €105.00 | -3.67% | 336.4M | -17.28 | -€6.25 | N/A |
| SCP.LS | €0.99 | +0.00% | 200M | 5.50 | €0.18 | N/A |
| SLBEN.LS | €7.24 | +0.84% | 167.4M | 4.79 | €1.52 | N/A |
| MCP.LS | €1.90 | +0.00% | 160.6M | 13.57 | €0.14 | +6.58% |
Stock Comparison
SCB.LS vs UMG.AS Comparison May 2026
SCB.LS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCB.LS stands at 18.4M. In comparison, UMG.AS has a market cap of 37.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SCB.LS is priced at €15.30, while UMG.AS trades at €20.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCB.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas UMG.AS's P/E ratio is 24.63. In terms of profitability, SCB.LS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to UMG.AS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SCB.LS is less volatile compared to UMG.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCB.LS.Check UMG.AS's competition here
SCB.LS vs BOL.PA Comparison May 2026
SCB.LS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCB.LS stands at 18.4M. In comparison, BOL.PA has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, SCB.LS is priced at €15.30, while BOL.PA trades at €5.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCB.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas BOL.PA's P/E ratio is 44.79. In terms of profitability, SCB.LS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BOL.PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SCB.LS is less volatile compared to BOL.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCB.LS.Check BOL.PA's competition here
SCB.LS vs FLE.AS Comparison May 2026
SCB.LS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCB.LS stands at 18.4M. In comparison, FLE.AS has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, SCB.LS is priced at €15.30, while FLE.AS trades at €9.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCB.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas FLE.AS's P/E ratio is 55.59. In terms of profitability, SCB.LS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FLE.AS's ROE of +2.72%. Regarding short-term risk, SCB.LS is less volatile compared to FLE.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCB.LS.Check FLE.AS's competition here
SCB.LS vs VIV.PA Comparison May 2026
SCB.LS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCB.LS stands at 18.4M. In comparison, VIV.PA has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SCB.LS is priced at €15.30, while VIV.PA trades at €2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCB.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas VIV.PA's P/E ratio is 117.30. In terms of profitability, SCB.LS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to VIV.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SCB.LS is less volatile compared to VIV.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCB.LS.Check VIV.PA's competition here
SCB.LS vs KIN.BR Comparison May 2026
SCB.LS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCB.LS stands at 18.4M. In comparison, KIN.BR has a market cap of 783.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SCB.LS is priced at €15.30, while KIN.BR trades at €29.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCB.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas KIN.BR's P/E ratio is 20.63. In terms of profitability, SCB.LS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KIN.BR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SCB.LS is less volatile compared to KIN.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCB.LS.Check KIN.BR's competition here
SCB.LS vs GAM.PA Comparison May 2026
SCB.LS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCB.LS stands at 18.4M. In comparison, GAM.PA has a market cap of 336.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SCB.LS is priced at €15.30, while GAM.PA trades at €105.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCB.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas GAM.PA's P/E ratio is -17.28. In terms of profitability, SCB.LS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GAM.PA's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SCB.LS is less volatile compared to GAM.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCB.LS.Check GAM.PA's competition here
SCB.LS vs SCP.LS Comparison May 2026
SCB.LS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCB.LS stands at 18.4M. In comparison, SCP.LS has a market cap of 200M. Regarding current trading prices, SCB.LS is priced at €15.30, while SCP.LS trades at €0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCB.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas SCP.LS's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, SCB.LS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SCP.LS's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, SCB.LS and SCP.LS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SCP.LS's competition here
SCB.LS vs SLBEN.LS Comparison May 2026
SCB.LS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCB.LS stands at 18.4M. In comparison, SLBEN.LS has a market cap of 167.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SCB.LS is priced at €15.30, while SLBEN.LS trades at €7.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCB.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas SLBEN.LS's P/E ratio is 4.79. In terms of profitability, SCB.LS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SLBEN.LS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SCB.LS is less volatile compared to SLBEN.LS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCB.LS.Check SLBEN.LS's competition here
SCB.LS vs MCP.LS Comparison May 2026
SCB.LS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCB.LS stands at 18.4M. In comparison, MCP.LS has a market cap of 160.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SCB.LS is priced at €15.30, while MCP.LS trades at €1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCB.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas MCP.LS's P/E ratio is 13.57. In terms of profitability, SCB.LS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MCP.LS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SCB.LS and MCP.LS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MCP.LS's competition here
SCB.LS vs AJAX.AS Comparison May 2026
SCB.LS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCB.LS stands at 18.4M. In comparison, AJAX.AS has a market cap of 157.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SCB.LS is priced at €15.30, while AJAX.AS trades at €8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCB.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas AJAX.AS's P/E ratio is -4.21. In terms of profitability, SCB.LS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AJAX.AS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SCB.LS is less volatile compared to AJAX.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCB.LS.Check AJAX.AS's competition here
SCB.LS vs DEEZR.PA Comparison May 2026
SCB.LS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCB.LS stands at 18.4M. In comparison, DEEZR.PA has a market cap of 138M. Regarding current trading prices, SCB.LS is priced at €15.30, while DEEZR.PA trades at €1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCB.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas DEEZR.PA's P/E ratio is 22.30. In terms of profitability, SCB.LS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DEEZR.PA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SCB.LS is less volatile compared to DEEZR.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCB.LS.Check DEEZR.PA's competition here
SCB.LS vs FCP.LS Comparison May 2026
SCB.LS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCB.LS stands at 18.4M. In comparison, FCP.LS has a market cap of 69.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SCB.LS is priced at €15.30, while FCP.LS trades at €3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCB.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas FCP.LS's P/E ratio is -3.26. In terms of profitability, SCB.LS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FCP.LS's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SCB.LS and FCP.LS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FCP.LS's competition here
SCB.LS vs ALECP.PA Comparison May 2026
SCB.LS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCB.LS stands at 18.4M. In comparison, ALECP.PA has a market cap of 45M. Regarding current trading prices, SCB.LS is priced at €15.30, while ALECP.PA trades at €0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCB.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas ALECP.PA's P/E ratio is -17.95. In terms of profitability, SCB.LS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ALECP.PA's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, SCB.LS is less volatile compared to ALECP.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCB.LS.Check ALECP.PA's competition here
SCB.LS vs TCHCS.PA Comparison May 2026
SCB.LS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCB.LS stands at 18.4M. In comparison, TCHCS.PA has a market cap of 41.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SCB.LS is priced at €15.30, while TCHCS.PA trades at €1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCB.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas TCHCS.PA's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, SCB.LS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TCHCS.PA's ROE of +3.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SCB.LS is less volatile compared to TCHCS.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCB.LS.Check TCHCS.PA's competition here
SCB.LS vs XIL.PA Comparison May 2026
SCB.LS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCB.LS stands at 18.4M. In comparison, XIL.PA has a market cap of 17.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SCB.LS is priced at €15.30, while XIL.PA trades at €3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCB.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas XIL.PA's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, SCB.LS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to XIL.PA's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, SCB.LS is less volatile compared to XIL.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCB.LS.Check XIL.PA's competition here
SCB.LS vs TCH.PA Comparison May 2026
SCB.LS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCB.LS stands at 18.4M. In comparison, TCH.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SCB.LS is priced at €15.30, while TCH.PA trades at €2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCB.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas TCH.PA's P/E ratio is -5.90. In terms of profitability, SCB.LS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TCH.PA's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, SCB.LS is less volatile compared to TCH.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCB.LS.Check TCH.PA's competition here
SCB.LS vs ECP.PA Comparison May 2026
SCB.LS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCB.LS stands at 18.4M. In comparison, ECP.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SCB.LS is priced at €15.30, while ECP.PA trades at €0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCB.LS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.67, whereas ECP.PA's P/E ratio is 0.53. In terms of profitability, SCB.LS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ECP.PA's ROE of -21.48%. Regarding short-term risk, SCB.LS is less volatile compared to ECP.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCB.LS.Check ECP.PA's competition here