EuropaCorp
EuropaCorp (ECP.PA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ECP.PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Entertainment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ECP.PA | €0.68 | +0.00% | 0 | 0.53 | €1.28 | N/A |
| UMG.AS | €20.58 | +0.64% | 37.5B | 24.63 | €0.83 | +2.50% |
| BOL.PA | €5.47 | +2.15% | 15B | 44.79 | €0.12 | +1.48% |
| FLE.AS | €9.45 | +0.53% | 4B | 55.59 | €0.17 | N/A |
| VIV.PA | €2.32 | +0.61% | 2.3B | 117.30 | €0.02 | +1.69% |
| KIN.BR | €29.70 | -0.50% | 783.7M | 20.63 | €1.42 | +1.53% |
| GAM.PA | €108.00 | -0.92% | 336.4M | -17.28 | -€6.25 | N/A |
| SCP.LS | €0.99 | +0.00% | 200M | 5.50 | €0.18 | N/A |
| SLBEN.LS | €7.30 | +1.67% | 167.4M | 4.79 | €1.52 | N/A |
| MCP.LS | €1.90 | +0.00% | 160.6M | 13.57 | €0.14 | +6.58% |
Stock Comparison
ECP.PA vs UMG.AS Comparison May 2026
ECP.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECP.PA stands at 0. In comparison, UMG.AS has a market cap of 37.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ECP.PA is priced at €0.68, while UMG.AS trades at €20.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.53, whereas UMG.AS's P/E ratio is 24.63. In terms of profitability, ECP.PA's ROE is -21.48%, compared to UMG.AS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ECP.PA is more volatile compared to UMG.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECP.PA.Check UMG.AS's competition here
ECP.PA vs BOL.PA Comparison May 2026
ECP.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECP.PA stands at 0. In comparison, BOL.PA has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, ECP.PA is priced at €0.68, while BOL.PA trades at €5.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.53, whereas BOL.PA's P/E ratio is 44.79. In terms of profitability, ECP.PA's ROE is -21.48%, compared to BOL.PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ECP.PA is more volatile compared to BOL.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECP.PA.Check BOL.PA's competition here
ECP.PA vs FLE.AS Comparison May 2026
ECP.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECP.PA stands at 0. In comparison, FLE.AS has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, ECP.PA is priced at €0.68, while FLE.AS trades at €9.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.53, whereas FLE.AS's P/E ratio is 55.59. In terms of profitability, ECP.PA's ROE is -21.48%, compared to FLE.AS's ROE of +2.72%. Regarding short-term risk, ECP.PA is more volatile compared to FLE.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECP.PA.Check FLE.AS's competition here
ECP.PA vs VIV.PA Comparison May 2026
ECP.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECP.PA stands at 0. In comparison, VIV.PA has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ECP.PA is priced at €0.68, while VIV.PA trades at €2.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.53, whereas VIV.PA's P/E ratio is 117.30. In terms of profitability, ECP.PA's ROE is -21.48%, compared to VIV.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ECP.PA is more volatile compared to VIV.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECP.PA.Check VIV.PA's competition here
ECP.PA vs KIN.BR Comparison May 2026
ECP.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECP.PA stands at 0. In comparison, KIN.BR has a market cap of 783.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ECP.PA is priced at €0.68, while KIN.BR trades at €29.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.53, whereas KIN.BR's P/E ratio is 20.63. In terms of profitability, ECP.PA's ROE is -21.48%, compared to KIN.BR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ECP.PA is more volatile compared to KIN.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECP.PA.Check KIN.BR's competition here
ECP.PA vs GAM.PA Comparison May 2026
ECP.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECP.PA stands at 0. In comparison, GAM.PA has a market cap of 336.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ECP.PA is priced at €0.68, while GAM.PA trades at €108.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.53, whereas GAM.PA's P/E ratio is -17.28. In terms of profitability, ECP.PA's ROE is -21.48%, compared to GAM.PA's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ECP.PA is more volatile compared to GAM.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECP.PA.Check GAM.PA's competition here
ECP.PA vs SCP.LS Comparison May 2026
ECP.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECP.PA stands at 0. In comparison, SCP.LS has a market cap of 200M. Regarding current trading prices, ECP.PA is priced at €0.68, while SCP.LS trades at €0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.53, whereas SCP.LS's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, ECP.PA's ROE is -21.48%, compared to SCP.LS's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, ECP.PA is more volatile compared to SCP.LS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECP.PA.Check SCP.LS's competition here
ECP.PA vs SLBEN.LS Comparison May 2026
ECP.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECP.PA stands at 0. In comparison, SLBEN.LS has a market cap of 167.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ECP.PA is priced at €0.68, while SLBEN.LS trades at €7.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.53, whereas SLBEN.LS's P/E ratio is 4.79. In terms of profitability, ECP.PA's ROE is -21.48%, compared to SLBEN.LS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ECP.PA is less volatile compared to SLBEN.LS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECP.PA.Check SLBEN.LS's competition here
ECP.PA vs MCP.LS Comparison May 2026
ECP.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECP.PA stands at 0. In comparison, MCP.LS has a market cap of 160.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ECP.PA is priced at €0.68, while MCP.LS trades at €1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.53, whereas MCP.LS's P/E ratio is 13.57. In terms of profitability, ECP.PA's ROE is -21.48%, compared to MCP.LS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ECP.PA is more volatile compared to MCP.LS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECP.PA.Check MCP.LS's competition here
ECP.PA vs AJAX.AS Comparison May 2026
ECP.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECP.PA stands at 0. In comparison, AJAX.AS has a market cap of 157.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ECP.PA is priced at €0.68, while AJAX.AS trades at €8.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.53, whereas AJAX.AS's P/E ratio is -4.21. In terms of profitability, ECP.PA's ROE is -21.48%, compared to AJAX.AS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ECP.PA is more volatile compared to AJAX.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECP.PA.Check AJAX.AS's competition here
ECP.PA vs DEEZR.PA Comparison May 2026
ECP.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECP.PA stands at 0. In comparison, DEEZR.PA has a market cap of 138M. Regarding current trading prices, ECP.PA is priced at €0.68, while DEEZR.PA trades at €1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.53, whereas DEEZR.PA's P/E ratio is 22.30. In terms of profitability, ECP.PA's ROE is -21.48%, compared to DEEZR.PA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ECP.PA is more volatile compared to DEEZR.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECP.PA.Check DEEZR.PA's competition here
ECP.PA vs FCP.LS Comparison May 2026
ECP.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECP.PA stands at 0. In comparison, FCP.LS has a market cap of 69.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ECP.PA is priced at €0.68, while FCP.LS trades at €3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.53, whereas FCP.LS's P/E ratio is -3.26. In terms of profitability, ECP.PA's ROE is -21.48%, compared to FCP.LS's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ECP.PA is more volatile compared to FCP.LS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECP.PA.Check FCP.LS's competition here
ECP.PA vs ALECP.PA Comparison May 2026
ECP.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECP.PA stands at 0. In comparison, ALECP.PA has a market cap of 45M. Regarding current trading prices, ECP.PA is priced at €0.68, while ALECP.PA trades at €0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.53, whereas ALECP.PA's P/E ratio is -17.95. In terms of profitability, ECP.PA's ROE is -21.48%, compared to ALECP.PA's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ECP.PA is more volatile compared to ALECP.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECP.PA.Check ALECP.PA's competition here
ECP.PA vs TCHCS.PA Comparison May 2026
ECP.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECP.PA stands at 0. In comparison, TCHCS.PA has a market cap of 41.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ECP.PA is priced at €0.68, while TCHCS.PA trades at €1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.53, whereas TCHCS.PA's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, ECP.PA's ROE is -21.48%, compared to TCHCS.PA's ROE of +3.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ECP.PA is more volatile compared to TCHCS.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECP.PA.Check TCHCS.PA's competition here
ECP.PA vs SCB.LS Comparison May 2026
ECP.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECP.PA stands at 0. In comparison, SCB.LS has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ECP.PA is priced at €0.68, while SCB.LS trades at €15.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.53, whereas SCB.LS's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, ECP.PA's ROE is -21.48%, compared to SCB.LS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ECP.PA is more volatile compared to SCB.LS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECP.PA.Check SCB.LS's competition here
ECP.PA vs XIL.PA Comparison May 2026
ECP.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECP.PA stands at 0. In comparison, XIL.PA has a market cap of 17.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ECP.PA is priced at €0.68, while XIL.PA trades at €3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.53, whereas XIL.PA's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, ECP.PA's ROE is -21.48%, compared to XIL.PA's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, ECP.PA is more volatile compared to XIL.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECP.PA.Check XIL.PA's competition here
ECP.PA vs TCH.PA Comparison May 2026
ECP.PA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ECP.PA stands at 0. In comparison, TCH.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ECP.PA is priced at €0.68, while TCH.PA trades at €2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ECP.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 0.53, whereas TCH.PA's P/E ratio is -5.90. In terms of profitability, ECP.PA's ROE is -21.48%, compared to TCH.PA's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, ECP.PA is more volatile compared to TCH.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ECP.PA.Check TCH.PA's competition here