XPLR Infrastructure, LP

XIFR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XIFR stands at 1.1B. In comparison, VST has a market cap of 48.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XIFR is priced at $11.43, while VST trades at $147.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XIFR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.25, whereas VST's P/E ratio is 24.09. In terms of profitability, XIFR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VST's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, XIFR is more volatile compared to VST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIFR.Check VST's competition here

XIFR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XIFR stands at 1.1B. In comparison, NRG has a market cap of 28.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XIFR is priced at $11.43, while NRG trades at $135.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XIFR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.25, whereas NRG's P/E ratio is 145.62. In terms of profitability, XIFR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NRG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, XIFR is less volatile compared to NRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIFR.Check NRG's competition here

XIFR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XIFR stands at 1.1B. In comparison, TLN has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XIFR is priced at $11.43, while TLN trades at $351.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XIFR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.25, whereas TLN's P/E ratio is -662.42. In terms of profitability, XIFR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TLN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, XIFR is less volatile compared to TLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIFR.Check TLN's competition here

XIFR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XIFR stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AESC has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XIFR is priced at $11.43, while AESC trades at $62.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XIFR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.25, whereas AESC's P/E ratio is -280.76. In terms of profitability, XIFR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AESC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, XIFR is more volatile compared to AESC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIFR.Check AESC's competition here

XIFR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XIFR stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AES has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XIFR is priced at $11.43, while AES trades at $14.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XIFR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.25, whereas AES's P/E ratio is 7.67. In terms of profitability, XIFR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AES's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, XIFR is more volatile compared to AES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIFR.Check AES's competition here

XIFR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XIFR stands at 1.1B. In comparison, KEN has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XIFR is priced at $11.43, while KEN trades at $86.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XIFR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.25, whereas KEN's P/E ratio is 67.54. In terms of profitability, XIFR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KEN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, XIFR is less volatile compared to KEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIFR.Check KEN's competition here

XIFR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XIFR stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PAM has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XIFR is priced at $11.43, while PAM trades at $81.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XIFR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.25, whereas PAM's P/E ratio is 9.63. In terms of profitability, XIFR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PAM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, XIFR is less volatile compared to PAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIFR.Check PAM's competition here

XIFR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XIFR stands at 1.1B. In comparison, TAC has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XIFR is priced at $11.43, while TAC trades at $13.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XIFR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.25, whereas TAC's P/E ratio is -23.60. In terms of profitability, XIFR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TAC's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, XIFR is less volatile compared to TAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIFR.Check TAC's competition here

XIFR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XIFR stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SKYS has a market cap of 150.4M. Regarding current trading prices, XIFR is priced at $11.43, while SKYS trades at $7.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XIFR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.25, whereas SKYS's P/E ratio is -3.58. In terms of profitability, XIFR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SKYS's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, XIFR is less volatile compared to SKYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIFR.Check SKYS's competition here

XIFR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XIFR stands at 1.1B. In comparison, JE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, XIFR is priced at $11.43, while JE trades at $1.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XIFR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.25, whereas JE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XIFR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to JE's ROE of -4.91%. Regarding short-term risk, XIFR is less volatile compared to JE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIFR.Check JE's competition here

XIFR plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XIFR stands at 1.1B. In comparison, HNP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, XIFR is priced at $11.43, while HNP trades at $21.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XIFR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.25, whereas HNP's P/E ratio is -2.99. In terms of profitability, XIFR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HNP's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, XIFR is more volatile compared to HNP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIFR.Check HNP's competition here