Ellomay Capital Ltd. (AMEX: ELLO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Ellomay Capital Ltd. (AMEX: ELLO) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELLO stands at 295M. In comparison, AXIA has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ELLO is priced at $21.40 on the AMEX, while AXIA trades at $10.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELLO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas AXIA's P/E ratio is 12.59. In terms of profitability, ELLO's ROE is +0.38%, compared to AXIA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ELLO is less volatile compared to AXIA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELLO.Check AXIA's competition here

Ellomay Capital Ltd. (AMEX: ELLO) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELLO stands at 295M. In comparison, AQNU has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ELLO is priced at $21.40 on the AMEX, while AQNU trades at $19.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELLO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas AQNU's P/E ratio is 37.48. In terms of profitability, ELLO's ROE is +0.38%, compared to AQNU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ELLO is less volatile compared to AQNU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELLO.Check AQNU's competition here

Ellomay Capital Ltd. (AMEX: ELLO) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELLO stands at 295M. In comparison, ENLT has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ELLO is priced at $21.40 on the AMEX, while ENLT trades at $75.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELLO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas ENLT's P/E ratio is 139.54. In terms of profitability, ELLO's ROE is +0.38%, compared to ENLT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ELLO is less volatile compared to ENLT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELLO.Check ENLT's competition here

Ellomay Capital Ltd. (AMEX: ELLO) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELLO stands at 295M. In comparison, BEPI has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, ELLO is priced at $21.40 on the AMEX, while BEPI trades at $15.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELLO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas BEPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ELLO's ROE is +0.38%, compared to BEPI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ELLO is less volatile compared to BEPI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELLO.Check BEPI's competition here

Ellomay Capital Ltd. (AMEX: ELLO) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELLO stands at 295M. In comparison, BEPH has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ELLO is priced at $21.40 on the AMEX, while BEPH trades at $14.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELLO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas BEPH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ELLO's ROE is +0.38%, compared to BEPH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ELLO is less volatile compared to BEPH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELLO.Check BEPH's competition here

Ellomay Capital Ltd. (AMEX: ELLO) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELLO stands at 295M. In comparison, BEP has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ELLO is priced at $21.40 on the AMEX, while BEP trades at $29.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELLO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas BEP's P/E ratio is -64.63. In terms of profitability, ELLO's ROE is +0.38%, compared to BEP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ELLO is less volatile compared to BEP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELLO.Check BEP's competition here

Ellomay Capital Ltd. (AMEX: ELLO) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELLO stands at 295M. In comparison, CWEN-A has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ELLO is priced at $21.40 on the AMEX, while CWEN-A trades at $40.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELLO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas CWEN-A's P/E ratio is 28.27. In terms of profitability, ELLO's ROE is +0.38%, compared to CWEN-A's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ELLO is similarly volatile compared to CWEN-A. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELLO.Check CWEN-A's competition here

Ellomay Capital Ltd. (AMEX: ELLO) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELLO stands at 295M. In comparison, CWEN has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ELLO is priced at $21.40 on the AMEX, while CWEN trades at $30.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELLO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas CWEN's P/E ratio is 40.64. In terms of profitability, ELLO's ROE is +0.38%, compared to CWEN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ELLO is less volatile compared to CWEN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELLO.Check CWEN's competition here

Ellomay Capital Ltd. (AMEX: ELLO) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELLO stands at 295M. In comparison, BEP-PA has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, ELLO is priced at $21.40 on the AMEX, while BEP-PA trades at $16.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELLO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas BEP-PA's P/E ratio is -38.56. In terms of profitability, ELLO's ROE is +0.38%, compared to BEP-PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ELLO is less volatile compared to BEP-PA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELLO.Check BEP-PA's competition here

Ellomay Capital Ltd. (AMEX: ELLO) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELLO stands at 295M. In comparison, ORA has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ELLO is priced at $21.40 on the AMEX, while ORA trades at $96.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELLO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas ORA's P/E ratio is 33.50. In terms of profitability, ELLO's ROE is +0.38%, compared to ORA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ELLO is less volatile compared to ORA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELLO.Check ORA's competition here

Ellomay Capital Ltd. (AMEX: ELLO) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELLO stands at 295M. In comparison, FRVO has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ELLO is priced at $21.40 on the AMEX, while FRVO trades at $16.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELLO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas FRVO's P/E ratio is -37.40. In terms of profitability, ELLO's ROE is +0.38%, compared to FRVO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ELLO is less volatile compared to FRVO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELLO.Check FRVO's competition here

Ellomay Capital Ltd. (AMEX: ELLO) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELLO stands at 295M. In comparison, BEPC has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ELLO is priced at $21.40 on the AMEX, while BEPC trades at $29.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELLO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas BEPC's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, ELLO's ROE is +0.38%, compared to BEPC's ROE of +2.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ELLO is less volatile compared to BEPC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELLO.Check BEPC's competition here

Ellomay Capital Ltd. (AMEX: ELLO) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELLO stands at 295M. In comparison, MWH has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ELLO is priced at $21.40 on the AMEX, while MWH trades at $26.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELLO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas MWH's P/E ratio is 672.25. In terms of profitability, ELLO's ROE is +0.38%, compared to MWH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ELLO is less volatile compared to MWH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELLO.Check MWH's competition here

Ellomay Capital Ltd. (AMEX: ELLO) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELLO stands at 295M. In comparison, AY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ELLO is priced at $21.40 on the AMEX, while AY trades at $21.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELLO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas AY's P/E ratio is 87.96. In terms of profitability, ELLO's ROE is +0.38%, compared to AY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ELLO is less volatile compared to AY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELLO.Check AY's competition here

Ellomay Capital Ltd. (AMEX: ELLO) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELLO stands at 295M. In comparison, SMR-WT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ELLO is priced at $21.40 on the AMEX, while SMR-WT trades at $0.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELLO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas SMR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ELLO's ROE is +0.38%, compared to SMR-WT's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ELLO is less volatile compared to SMR-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELLO.Check SMR-WT's competition here

Ellomay Capital Ltd. (AMEX: ELLO) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELLO stands at 295M. In comparison, RNW has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ELLO is priced at $21.40 on the AMEX, while RNW trades at $6.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELLO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas RNW's P/E ratio is 22.15. In terms of profitability, ELLO's ROE is +0.38%, compared to RNW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ELLO is less volatile compared to RNW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELLO.Check RNW's competition here

Ellomay Capital Ltd. (AMEX: ELLO) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELLO stands at 295M. In comparison, FLNC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ELLO is priced at $21.40 on the AMEX, while FLNC trades at $7.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELLO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas FLNC's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, ELLO's ROE is +0.38%, compared to FLNC's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ELLO is less volatile compared to FLNC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELLO.Check FLNC's competition here

Ellomay Capital Ltd. (AMEX: ELLO) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELLO stands at 295M. In comparison, XIFR has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ELLO is priced at $21.40 on the AMEX, while XIFR trades at $10.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELLO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas XIFR's P/E ratio is 15.94. In terms of profitability, ELLO's ROE is +0.38%, compared to XIFR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ELLO is less volatile compared to XIFR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELLO.Check XIFR's competition here

Ellomay Capital Ltd. (AMEX: ELLO) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELLO stands at 295M. In comparison, NEP has a market cap of 985.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ELLO is priced at $21.40 on the AMEX, while NEP trades at $10.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELLO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas NEP's P/E ratio is -105.40. In terms of profitability, ELLO's ROE is +0.38%, compared to NEP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ELLO is less volatile compared to NEP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELLO.Check NEP's competition here

Ellomay Capital Ltd. (AMEX: ELLO) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELLO stands at 295M. In comparison, AMPS has a market cap of 800.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ELLO is priced at $21.40 on the AMEX, while AMPS trades at $4.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELLO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas AMPS's P/E ratio is 499.00. In terms of profitability, ELLO's ROE is +0.38%, compared to AMPS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ELLO is less volatile compared to AMPS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELLO.Check AMPS's competition here

Ellomay Capital Ltd. (AMEX: ELLO) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELLO stands at 295M. In comparison, GFUZ has a market cap of 644.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ELLO is priced at $21.40 on the AMEX, while GFUZ trades at $7.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELLO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas GFUZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ELLO's ROE is +0.38%, compared to GFUZ's ROE of -2.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ELLO is less volatile compared to GFUZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELLO.Check GFUZ's competition here

Ellomay Capital Ltd. (AMEX: ELLO) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELLO stands at 295M. In comparison, AZRE has a market cap of 108.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ELLO is priced at $21.40 on the AMEX, while AZRE trades at $1.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELLO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas AZRE's P/E ratio is -2.14. In terms of profitability, ELLO's ROE is +0.38%, compared to AZRE's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ELLO is less volatile compared to AZRE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELLO.Check AZRE's competition here

Ellomay Capital Ltd. (AMEX: ELLO) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELLO stands at 295M. In comparison, VGAS has a market cap of 59.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ELLO is priced at $21.40 on the AMEX, while VGAS trades at $1.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELLO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas VGAS's P/E ratio is -4.19. In terms of profitability, ELLO's ROE is +0.38%, compared to VGAS's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ELLO is less volatile compared to VGAS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELLO.Check VGAS's competition here

Ellomay Capital Ltd. (AMEX: ELLO) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELLO stands at 295M. In comparison, STEM has a market cap of 39.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ELLO is priced at $21.40 on the AMEX, while STEM trades at $4.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELLO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas STEM's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, ELLO's ROE is +0.38%, compared to STEM's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ELLO is less volatile compared to STEM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELLO.Check STEM's competition here

Ellomay Capital Ltd. (AMEX: ELLO) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELLO stands at 295M. In comparison, WAVE has a market cap of 35.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ELLO is priced at $21.40 on the AMEX, while WAVE trades at $6.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELLO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas WAVE's P/E ratio is -10.04. In terms of profitability, ELLO's ROE is +0.38%, compared to WAVE's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, ELLO is less volatile compared to WAVE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELLO.Check WAVE's competition here

Ellomay Capital Ltd. (AMEX: ELLO) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELLO stands at 295M. In comparison, GFUZW has a market cap of 32M. Regarding current trading prices, ELLO is priced at $21.40 on the AMEX, while GFUZW trades at $1.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELLO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas GFUZW's P/E ratio is -2.66. In terms of profitability, ELLO's ROE is +0.38%, compared to GFUZW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ELLO is less volatile compared to GFUZW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELLO.Check GFUZW's competition here

Ellomay Capital Ltd. (AMEX: ELLO) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELLO stands at 295M. In comparison, BESS has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ELLO is priced at $21.40 on the AMEX, while BESS trades at $2.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELLO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas BESS's P/E ratio is -2.26. In terms of profitability, ELLO's ROE is +0.38%, compared to BESS's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ELLO is less volatile compared to BESS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELLO.Check BESS's competition here

Ellomay Capital Ltd. (AMEX: ELLO) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELLO stands at 295M. In comparison, PBK has a market cap of 15.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ELLO is priced at $21.40 on the AMEX, while PBK trades at $0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELLO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas PBK's P/E ratio is -3.37. In terms of profitability, ELLO's ROE is +0.38%, compared to PBK's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ELLO is less volatile compared to PBK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELLO.Check PBK's competition here

Ellomay Capital Ltd. (AMEX: ELLO) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELLO stands at 295M. In comparison, NXXT has a market cap of 14.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ELLO is priced at $21.40 on the AMEX, while NXXT trades at $0.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELLO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas NXXT's P/E ratio is -2.05. In terms of profitability, ELLO's ROE is +0.38%, compared to NXXT's ROE of +3.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ELLO is less volatile compared to NXXT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELLO.Check NXXT's competition here

Ellomay Capital Ltd. (AMEX: ELLO) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELLO stands at 295M. In comparison, HTOO has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, ELLO is priced at $21.40 on the AMEX, while HTOO trades at $1.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELLO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas HTOO's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, ELLO's ROE is +0.38%, compared to HTOO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ELLO is less volatile compared to HTOO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELLO.Check HTOO's competition here

Ellomay Capital Ltd. (AMEX: ELLO) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELLO stands at 295M. In comparison, HLGN-WT has a market cap of 11.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ELLO is priced at $21.40 on the AMEX, while HLGN-WT trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELLO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas HLGN-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ELLO's ROE is +0.38%, compared to HLGN-WT's ROE of +3.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ELLO is less volatile compared to HLGN-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELLO.Check HLGN-WT's competition here

Ellomay Capital Ltd. (AMEX: ELLO) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELLO stands at 295M. In comparison, CREG has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ELLO is priced at $21.40 on the AMEX, while CREG trades at $0.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELLO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas CREG's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, ELLO's ROE is +0.38%, compared to CREG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ELLO is similarly volatile compared to CREG. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELLO.Check CREG's competition here

Ellomay Capital Ltd. (AMEX: ELLO) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELLO stands at 295M. In comparison, BNRG has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ELLO is priced at $21.40 on the AMEX, while BNRG trades at $3.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELLO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas BNRG's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, ELLO's ROE is +0.38%, compared to BNRG's ROE of -5.93%. Regarding short-term risk, ELLO is less volatile compared to BNRG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELLO.Check BNRG's competition here

Ellomay Capital Ltd. (AMEX: ELLO) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELLO stands at 295M. In comparison, ADN has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ELLO is priced at $21.40 on the AMEX, while ADN trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELLO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas ADN's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, ELLO's ROE is +0.38%, compared to ADN's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ELLO is less volatile compared to ADN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELLO.Check ADN's competition here

Ellomay Capital Ltd. (AMEX: ELLO) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELLO stands at 295M. In comparison, ELIQ has a market cap of 709.5K. Regarding current trading prices, ELLO is priced at $21.40 on the AMEX, while ELIQ trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELLO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas ELIQ's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, ELLO's ROE is +0.38%, compared to ELIQ's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, ELLO is less volatile compared to ELIQ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELLO.Check ELIQ's competition here

Ellomay Capital Ltd. (AMEX: ELLO) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELLO stands at 295M. In comparison, RNWWW has a market cap of 181.8K. Regarding current trading prices, ELLO is priced at $21.40 on the AMEX, while RNWWW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELLO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas RNWWW's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, ELLO's ROE is +0.38%, compared to RNWWW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ELLO is less volatile compared to RNWWW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELLO.Check RNWWW's competition here

Ellomay Capital Ltd. (AMEX: ELLO) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELLO stands at 295M. In comparison, ARMM has a market cap of 106.2K. Regarding current trading prices, ELLO is priced at $21.40 on the AMEX, while ARMM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELLO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas ARMM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ELLO's ROE is +0.38%, compared to ARMM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ELLO is similarly volatile compared to ARMM. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELLO.Check ARMM's competition here

Ellomay Capital Ltd. (AMEX: ELLO) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELLO stands at 295M. In comparison, HTOOW has a market cap of 3.6K. Regarding current trading prices, ELLO is priced at $21.40 on the AMEX, while HTOOW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELLO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas HTOOW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ELLO's ROE is +0.38%, compared to HTOOW's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ELLO is less volatile compared to HTOOW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELLO.Check HTOOW's competition here

Ellomay Capital Ltd. (AMEX: ELLO) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELLO stands at 295M. In comparison, ADNWW has a market cap of 544. Regarding current trading prices, ELLO is priced at $21.40 on the AMEX, while ADNWW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELLO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas ADNWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ELLO's ROE is +0.38%, compared to ADNWW's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ELLO is less volatile compared to ADNWW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELLO.Check ADNWW's competition here

Ellomay Capital Ltd. (AMEX: ELLO) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELLO stands at 295M. In comparison, LFG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ELLO is priced at $21.40 on the AMEX, while LFG trades at $26.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELLO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas LFG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ELLO's ROE is +0.38%, compared to LFG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ELLO is less volatile compared to LFG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELLO.Check LFG's competition here

Ellomay Capital Ltd. (AMEX: ELLO) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELLO stands at 295M. In comparison, GXP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ELLO is priced at $21.40 on the AMEX, while GXP trades at $31.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELLO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas GXP's P/E ratio is 17.77. In terms of profitability, ELLO's ROE is +0.38%, compared to GXP's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ELLO is less volatile compared to GXP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELLO.Check GXP's competition here

Ellomay Capital Ltd. (AMEX: ELLO) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELLO stands at 295M. In comparison, AMPS-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ELLO is priced at $21.40 on the AMEX, while AMPS-WT trades at $2.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELLO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas AMPS-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ELLO's ROE is +0.38%, compared to AMPS-WT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ELLO is less volatile compared to AMPS-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELLO.Check AMPS-WT's competition here

Ellomay Capital Ltd. (AMEX: ELLO) plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ELLO stands at 295M. In comparison, JNS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ELLO is priced at $21.40 on the AMEX, while JNS trades at $14.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ELLO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.33, whereas JNS's P/E ratio is 17.94. In terms of profitability, ELLO's ROE is +0.38%, compared to JNS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ELLO is less volatile compared to JNS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELLO.Check JNS's competition here